Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: funk51 on September 14, 2014, 08:49:36 AM

Title: on and off.
Post by: funk51 on September 14, 2014, 08:49:36 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: Archer77 on September 14, 2014, 08:51:06 AM
The Rock made the right choice.  He doesn't have leading man good looks and he will never win an academy aware.  He needs to be the charismatic muscle bound action hero hes meant to be.
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: DroppingPlates on September 14, 2014, 09:32:17 AM
Yes, a good tan is like the icing on the cake.
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: Complex Carbs on September 14, 2014, 09:39:56 AM
The people with best genetics also have the best response to drugs.

The people who respond poorly to drugs never look good while natural, whilst the gifted ones become obvious very early on.

A bad structure is impossible to overcome.


Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: local hero on September 14, 2014, 09:45:39 AM
Im sure I read an article about untrained measurements of forearms and somthing else in 12 to 14yr old boys and it having a huge link in athletic ability in power sports and drug response, was an eastern bloc thing
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: BIG ACH on September 14, 2014, 11:27:37 AM

He slimmed down when he had that 4 movie deal with Disney - thats what they wanted.  But now that he's done with that contract, no holding back!!! :-D
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: The True Adonis on September 14, 2014, 11:32:29 AM
Im sure I read an article about untrained measurements of forearms and somthing else in 12 to 14yr old boys and it having a huge link in athletic ability in power sports and drug response, was an eastern bloc thing
Sounds stupid given that the fact that midgets have the largest forearms, yet the worst athletic performance in sports- they can`t run, jump, run long distances, sprint or do much of anything other than lift weights (some of them).
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: Alucard on September 14, 2014, 11:33:32 AM
His physique to me always looked not that good... Tall, decent structure (nothing exceptional), mediocre muscle bellies...
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: local hero on September 14, 2014, 11:53:32 AM
Sounds stupid given that the fact that midgets have the largest forearms, yet the worst athletic performance in sports- they can`t run, jump, run long distances, sprint or do much of anything other than lift weights (some of them).

I'm sure those eastern bloc coaches knew a little more than your self and had the sence not to look at midgets, which would be rather silly... Just as silly claiming 200 cals worth of sugar is the same as 200 cals worth of chicken breast and how its used by the body
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: jude2 on September 14, 2014, 12:51:33 PM
He slimmed down when he had that 4 movie deal with Disney - thats what they wanted.  But now that he's done with that contract, no holding back!!! :-D
They don't understand that. Actors lose and gain weight all the time for the money.
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: BodyConnoisseur on September 14, 2014, 02:21:17 PM
The people with best genetics also have the best response to drugs.

The people who respond poorly to drugs never look good while natural, whilst the gifted ones become obvious very early on.

A bad structure is impossible to overcome.


Exactly. With my genetics everyone assumed I was juicing after 1 year of training, none of my friends progressed like me naturally.
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: anabolichalo on September 14, 2014, 02:23:51 PM
a lot of people on getbig who attribute it to genetic drug response are also people who have shit discipline and or use shit drug protocol


interesting

Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: Montague on September 14, 2014, 02:31:58 PM
Just as silly claiming 200 cals worth of sugar is the same as 200 cals worth of chicken breast and how its used by the body


Careful... you may cause another amendment to "the principles."
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: HTexan on September 14, 2014, 02:33:47 PM
Exactly. With my genetics everyone assumed I was juicing after 1 year of training, none of my friends progressed like me naturally.

how long have you been juicing for?
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: funk51 on September 14, 2014, 02:37:07 PM
the rock was never in the shape his old man attained.
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: WOOO on September 14, 2014, 03:43:54 PM
allcgi
Title: Re: on and off.
Post by: funk51 on September 15, 2014, 06:40:34 AM
allcgi
??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???