Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:40:58 PM

Title: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:40:58 PM: lets compare em real quick in a section of pictures with jay narrarating.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:42:20 PM: ..
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:43:18 PM: ...
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:44:09 PM: note: the first posts pictures are reversed..read the bottom one first!!.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: IFBBwannaB on February 13, 2006, 10:21:13 PM: Dont quit your day job.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: Dnizneer on February 13, 2006, 11:34:58 PM: Wheres the plot, and whos playing the tree?
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: GigantorX on February 14, 2006, 01:28:59 AM: And really, from those pics or whatever...I cant tell the fucking difference. Lets be honest, and neither can the judges.....sitting oh so far back. BB is a joke.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: Harry R. M. Pitts on February 14, 2006, 06:56:33 AM: Dayum Ronnie's midsection looks better than Jay's in those pics :o
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: BM OUT on February 14, 2006, 08:28:23 AM: Yes,Gunter looks awesome compared to Ronnie,especially when they turn around to the back.Its clear Gunter has a much thicker and more detailed back then Coleman and his hamstrings blow Ronnies away.By the way,exactly how do these judges get air brushed pictures when they determine the winner?Gunter over Ronnie at the Olympia,now Ive heard it all.By the way how did Gunter stack up in 2003,2004 and 2005?
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: Big Worm on February 14, 2006, 09:44:23 AM: Quote from: candidate2025 on February 13, 2006, 09:40:58 PM
lets compare em real quick in a section of pictures with jay narrarating.
SWEET JESUS !!! NOT AGAIN???? RONNIE WON ALREADY !! GET OVER IT !!
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: paul84 on February 14, 2006, 10:06:13 AM: One of the least funny threads ever.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on February 14, 2006, 10:08:44 AM: F+ for this thread
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: kiwiol on February 14, 2006, 10:22:03 AM: Quote from: joshberry2000 on February 14, 2006, 07:12:23 AM
anyone who has seen jay cutller or ron coleman in person or on video knows that cutler looks better.
coleman's abs are alway's bloated and look horrible but with the miracle
of air brushing his photos he looks great ron coleman wins the olympia
because of politics not because he's the best anyone remember when
he was booed by the whole crowd in attendance after his 2002 olympia
win and everyone chanted guenter schierkamp's name!

Have you seen the video of the 2005 Mr. Olympia mate? Coz the pics above or others posted elsewhere don't do Ronnie any justice. Sure he relaxed his abs here and there briefly, but on the whole, he looked incredible. Not sure if he filled out a little more for the night show, but he looked way better (& much bigger) in the video - he was the clear cut winner.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: Jr. Yates on February 14, 2006, 12:18:37 PM: Quote from: 8 INCH not biceps on February 14, 2006, 10:08:44 AM
F+ for this thread
hahahaha
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: ANAL DISCHARGE on February 14, 2006, 01:00:36 PM: GAYLORD DEATH.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: Hulkster on February 14, 2006, 06:42:22 PM: apparently Ronnie has won 8 Olympias due to airbrushing.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: alexxx on February 14, 2006, 06:45:13 PM: Jay is a rich homo!
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: bailey on February 16, 2006, 01:42:01 PM: picture 3. Ronnies legs destroy Jays. And jay has good legs.
Title: Re: jay vs. ronnie
Post by: candidate2025 on February 16, 2006, 01:47:14 PM: other than the fact that ronnie does look better than jay here...soemone can delete this for me.

i forgot i posted this when i was blown....yeah it was funny then. not funny now. at all.