Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Irongrip400 on September 22, 2014, 11:02:23 AM

Title: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Irongrip400 on September 22, 2014, 11:02:23 AM
Face it, bodybuilding is a niche sport/pageant, and it will never make any real money unless you get the fringe viewer involved.  Much like NASCAR or the NFL, the hardcore fans will watch no matter what, as they are passionate about it and will continue to watch their oiled up hero men in glittery thongs.  

That said, it can not go mainstream until it is cleaned up a bit.  I figured that with the death of the Weiders, that this would be a good time to get someone in there that will clean house, and throw the drug pushers and abusers out of the sport.  Also, the g4p and the grapefruit fucking has to go as well.  You can never really capture the attention of the mainstream public, while you continue to have this sport cater to more fetish seekers and muscle worshipping closet cases.  With more viewers comes more money for the sport, that will then be passed to the competitors, so the shady side of bodybuilding need not be catered to anymore.  

Get a hard nosed commissioner in there who has a clean background and can talk partnerships with main stream media companies, and pay the man what he is worth instead of having some idiot in a shark skinned suit taking the industry for a ride for a few more minutes of fame in a magazine.  There is a parasitic element to this sport and over inflated sense of importance on the part of the industry insiders which holds the whole thing back from gaining notoriety.  Just my two cents.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 22, 2014, 11:31:15 AM
Roger goodell wouldn't let Phil heath step forward a foot, or move 2 feet into Kai's spot.

Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: the trainer on September 22, 2014, 11:54:08 AM
Face it, bodybuilding is a niche sport/pageant, and it will never make any real money unless you get the fringe viewer involved.  Much like NASCAR or the NFL, the hardcore fans will watch no matter what, as they are passionate about it and will continue to watch their oiled up hero men in glittery thongs.  That said, it can not go mainstream until it is cleaned up a bit.  I figured that with the death of the Weiders, that this would be a good time to get someone in there that will clean house, and throw the drug pushers and abusers out of the sport.  Also, the g4p and the grapefruit fucking has to go as well.  You can never really capture the attention of the mainstream public, while you continue to have this sport cater to more fetish seekers and muscle worshipping closet cases.  With more viewers comes more money for the sport, that will then be passed to the competitors, so the shady side of bodybuilding need not be catered to anymore.  Get a hard nosed commissioner in there who has a clean background and can talk partnerships with main stream media companies, and pay the man what he is worth instead of having some idiot in a shark skinned suit taking the industry for a ride for a few more minutes of fame in a magazine.  There is a parasitic element to this sport and over inflated sense of importance on the part of the industry insiders which holds the whole thing back from gaining notoriety.  Just my two cents.

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/362/718/a9c.png)
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Parker on September 22, 2014, 12:21:53 PM
Yes, he'll they need a Vince McMahon, if anything.
WWE already has a Night of Champions (this past Sunday?)
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Irongrip400 on September 22, 2014, 01:55:10 PM
(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/362/718/a9c.png)

Happy now you fucking homo?
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: bradistani on September 22, 2014, 02:06:03 PM
Face it, bodybuilding is a niche sport/pageant, and it will never make any real money unless you get the fringe viewer involved.  Much like NASCAR or the NFL, the hardcore fans will watch no matter what, as they are passionate about it and will continue to watch their oiled up hero men in glittery thongs.  

That said, it can not go mainstream until it is cleaned up a bit.  I figured that with the death of the Weiders, that this would be a good time to get someone in there that will clean house, and throw the drug pushers and abusers out of the sport.  Also, the g4p and the grapefruit fucking has to go as well.  You can never really capture the attention of the mainstream public, while you continue to have this sport cater to more fetish seekers and muscle worshipping closet cases.  With more viewers comes more money for the sport, that will then be passed to the competitors, so the shady side of bodybuilding need not be catered to anymore.  

Get a hard nosed commissioner in there who has a clean background and can talk partnerships with main stream media companies, and pay the man what he is worth instead of having some idiot in a shark skinned suit taking the industry for a ride for a few more minutes of fame in a magazine.  There is a parasitic element to this sport and over inflated sense of importance on the part of the industry insiders which holds the whole thing back from gaining notoriety.  Just my two cents.

it can't go mainstream because as a spectator sport, its boring as fucking fuck. 'point simple, point blank!'
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Nick Danger on September 22, 2014, 02:09:13 PM
As sports go, bodybuilding is somewhere below bowling.
They don't need a commissioner...if they want to be a legit sport, they need year around drug testing.
If the mainstream knew what these guys put in their bodies, it would be even more frowned upon...
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: SF1900 on September 22, 2014, 02:12:44 PM
Face it, bodybuilding is a niche sport/pageant, and it will never make any real money unless you get the fringe viewer involved.  Much like NASCAR or the NFL, the hardcore fans will watch no matter what, as they are passionate about it and will continue to watch their oiled up hero men in glittery thongs.  

That said, it can not go mainstream until it is cleaned up a bit.  I figured that with the death of the Weiders, that this would be a good time to get someone in there that will clean house, and throw the drug pushers and abusers out of the sport.  Also, the g4p and the grapefruit fucking has to go as well.  You can never really capture the attention of the mainstream public, while you continue to have this sport cater to more fetish seekers and muscle worshipping closet cases.  With more viewers comes more money for the sport, that will then be passed to the competitors, so the shady side of bodybuilding need not be catered to anymore.  

Get a hard nosed commissioner in there who has a clean background and can talk partnerships with main stream media companies, and pay the man what he is worth instead of having some idiot in a shark skinned suit taking the industry for a ride for a few more minutes of fame in a magazine.  There is a parasitic element to this sport and over inflated sense of importance on the part of the industry insiders which holds the whole thing back from gaining notoriety.  Just my two cents.

I don't want it to go mainstream. If it went mainstream and was cleaned up, it would be boring.

I enjoy gossiping about g4p, failed organs, heart replacements followed by more drug use, shady pasts involving fruits, obsessive drug use, failed marriages due to the bodybuilding lifestyle, arrests, roid rage, narcissism, half-reps on the smith machine, etc.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Irongrip400 on September 23, 2014, 05:51:35 AM
I don't want it to go mainstream. If it went mainstream and was cleaned up, it would be boring.

I enjoy gossiping about g4p, failed organs, heart replacements followed by more drug use, shady pasts involving fruits, obsessive drug use, failed marriages due to the bodybuilding lifestyle, arrests, roid rage, narcissism, half-reps on the smith machine, etc.

Exactly my point, the hardcore fans are always more conservative and resist change.  But, they will always be there.  Much like the NASCAR revolt by fans when they changed from Winston Cup, and started restrictor plate racing.  All those rednecks said they wouldn't watch.  What happened? More people watched.  It is the same with NFL.  People said softening up the game would be bad, but look, it is as popular as ever.  You need more viewers to make it more profitable, and thus more lucrative for the competitors.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: DroppingPlates on September 23, 2014, 06:02:08 AM
Why does it need to become mainstream? Someone who only wants to compete for big bucks has the wrong mindset.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: Irongrip400 on September 23, 2014, 06:09:02 AM
Why does it need to become mainstream? Someone who only wants to compete for big bucks has the wrong mindset.

The top level guys do it as a source of income, why not try and get the most you can out of it.  After all, as we have seen, you are taking years off of your life fro it, why not get a few more bucks? ???
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: DroppingPlates on September 23, 2014, 06:34:41 AM
The top level guys do it as a source of income, why not try and get the most you can out of it.  After all, as we have seen, you are taking years off of your life fro it, why not get a few more bucks? ???

As a source of income ok, but trying to get the most out of it? Again, I believe this is the wrong mindset. That spoiled Gucci diva (Phil) is a prime example, a horrible rolemodel, and not just because of his physique.

All competitors (the delusional ones excluded) understand that you can't make a living from price money alone and no one forces them to make certain decisions.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: residue on September 23, 2014, 06:37:32 AM
Face it, bodybuilding is a niche sport/pageant, and it will never make any real money unless you get the fringe viewer involved.  Much like NASCAR or the NFL, the hardcore fans will watch no matter what, as they are passionate about it and will continue to watch their oiled up hero men in glittery thongs.  

That said, it can not go mainstream until it is cleaned up a bit.  I figured that with the death of the Weiders, that this would be a good time to get someone in there that will clean house, and throw the drug pushers and abusers out of the sport.  Also, the g4p and the grapefruit fucking has to go as well.  You can never really capture the attention of the mainstream public, while you continue to have this sport cater to more fetish seekers and muscle worshipping closet cases.  With more viewers comes more money for the sport, that will then be passed to the competitors, so the shady side of bodybuilding need not be catered to anymore.  

Get a hard nosed commissioner in there who has a clean background and can talk partnerships with main stream media companies, and pay the man what he is worth instead of having some idiot in a shark skinned suit taking the industry for a ride for a few more minutes of fame in a magazine.  There is a parasitic element to this sport and over inflated sense of importance on the part of the industry insiders which holds the whole thing back from gaining notoriety.  Just my two cents.

it can go mainstream when the entire pageant is built against breaking the law(steroids)
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: SuperTed on September 23, 2014, 06:50:17 AM
BB is never something that will attract major media interest because at the end of the day, it's just a sort of beauty pageant that's built on drug use.

However, BB generally is quite popular around the world.
Look at how many followers and fans the top pro's have on FB, Twitter, Instagram etc. Often, it's more then the top performing athletes of more mainsteam sports.
Title: Re: Does bodybuilding need a "Goodell-like" figure?
Post by: BB on September 23, 2014, 07:08:12 AM
BB is never something that will attract major media interest because at the end of the day, it's just a sort of beauty pageant that's built on drug use.


This. It's just too boring to attract major mainstream interest. There really isn't any heavy physical competition to it, the posing is long and drawn out, etc.... That coupled with the pervasive drug use and gay4pay, dooms it. It will always be a niche sport. 

Also it would require a ton of money to reform it, and it probably isn't worth it to the supplement companies, they'd make more money in the anti-aging, and fitness (not bodybuilding, but cross training) fields.