Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: jephrius on September 23, 2014, 07:44:14 PM
-
(http://i37.tinypic.com/1zgwzua.jpg)
Greater than 1993 Dorian
Heath couldn't carry his gym bag.
-
I think ronnie looked better in 98,99 and possibly 2000
-
I think ronnie looked better in 98,99 and possibly 2000
I agree, he kinda looks better from the years before. It's that damn gut that kept growing.
-
He was bigger in 2003. nobody has come close.
-
(http://i37.tinypic.com/1zgwzua.jpg)
Greater than 1993 Dorian
Heath couldn't carry his gym bag.
as great as ronnie's biceps were they were relatively small and not full here.. not as when he was younger..
2003 was his freakiest shape but not his best..
-
as great as ronnie's biceps were they were relatively small and not full here.. not as when he was younger..
2003 was his freakiest shape but not his best..
His biceps are small and flat here? Hmm ok
-
His biceps are small and flat here? Hmm ok
i said "relatively" comparing to his best.. check his FDB from 1999 olympia..
-
(http://i37.tinypic.com/1zgwzua.jpg)
Heath couldn't carry his gyno gym bag.
-
Peak of back mass 2003 & maybe most conditioned.
-
as great as ronnie's biceps were they were relatively small and not full here.. not as when he was younger..
2003 was his freakiest shape but not his best..
what are you talkin about bro? ronnie is full and shredded there... nobody will reach this combination of mass and condition except ramy that guy has potential to surpass ronnie
-
everybody lovies ronnie
except jason
-
Coleman looked like a pregnant water buffalo in 2003.
This version of Ronnie could still battle for an Olympia top-spot:
-
Ronnie is my favorite bodybuilder.
-
Coleman looked like a pregnant water buffalo in 2003.
This version of Ronnie could still battle for an Olympia top-spot:
"battle" ::) for a "top spot" ::)
coleman absolutely DESTROYS any bber in the world
-
"battle" ::) for a "top spot" ::)
coleman absolutely DESTROYS any bber in the world
Himself and Dorian would have serious thing battles if both were at their peak
-
"battle" ::) for a "top spot" ::)
coleman absolutely DESTROYS any bber in the world
exactly ronnie at his best.
-
1999 or 2001 Coleman is peak bodybuilding. 2003 and onwards was a complete disaster and should never have happened to bodybuilding.
-
He looks like shit here, gut is all over the place, heavy gyno, arms look smaller, the earlier video posted looks much better and Dorian looks much better than 2003 Ronnie. 1999-2000 the best
-
He was bigger in 2003. nobody has come close.
He was even bigger in 2004 than he was in 2003.
-
(http://i37.tinypic.com/1zgwzua.jpg)
Greater than 1993 Dorian
Heath couldn't carry his gym bag.
It's always a mindfuck to see massive Dorian of 1993 with both his biceps in tact and no real serious injuries to speak of.
-
I dont get the mindless nut hugging of 03 ronnie.
IMO he looks like shit compared to 98/99/01ASC, but everyone says "he was bigger!"
Meh. His conditioning suffered for the mass and IMO that makes it far less impressive. Especially when you consider the imbalances he got as he got larger... musces completely dwarfing other muscles, holding water, massive gut...
Meh. Not impressed by the size for quality trade.
-
if you're a muscle schmoe then, yes
-
Dorian is more conditioned. Yes it's 257 pounds vs 283 pounds but Ronnie would probably have to lose at least 15 to be as conditioned as Dorian.
-
I dont get the mindless nut hugging of 03 ronnie.
IMO he looks like shit compared to 98/99/01ASC, but everyone says "he was bigger!"
Meh. His conditioning suffered for the mass and IMO that makes it far less impressive. Especially when you consider the imbalances he got as he got larger... musces completely dwarfing other muscles, holding water, massive gut...
Meh. Not impressed by the size for quality trade.
Spot on... Also probably different dosages between early 90s Yates and 2003 Coleman... Both would shit all over the current lineup...
-
Greatest of all time:
(http://i61.tinypic.com/nyvj0y.jpg)