Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nails on September 28, 2014, 09:46:05 AM
-
Social Experiment ::)
yea douche bags social Experiment to see how many views you get , so you can get paid by youtube
-
women have it both ways
they throw hands like men
and get protected like princesses
good deal
-
Lmao@the zero fucks given when Susie Chung was going in...women have it so hard :'(
-
Its completely legal to defend yourself against a woman using force or a woman against a man using force.
-
white knights defend females.
-
I think we should have 100% equality. Arrest the person committing the assault. No matter the gender.
You'll have a LOT less women slapping guys. And in turn, guys won't turn into pricks like Ray Rice and over-react by punching a woman out for a stinging slap.
The mens' over-reaction means they deserve jail time. HOWEVER the initial female's assault means she should be locked up ALSO.
Ray Rice's wife was spitting on him, slapping him. If a MAN spits/slaps, he goes to jail. If she does it, zero charge. That's wrong.
Charge 100% of people with assault, and it becomes a heck of a deterrant. I'm in clubs all the time - many people DO think a woman can slap a guy and get away with it - and the bar usually laughs at a man getting slapped by a woman. Let a man backhand a woman in front of the bar, you'll have 50 "heroes" stepping up to assault him".
-
''because she's an independent woman'' - lol, is there even such a thing
-
Black guy was a little too eager to be a hero. Think he was looking for a legit excuse to deliver a beat down.
Either that or he's the ultimate white knight.
-
I think we should have 100% equality. Arrest the person committing the assault. No matter the gender.
You'll have a LOT less women slapping guys. And in turn, guys won't turn into pricks like Ray Rice and over-react by punching a woman out for a stinging slap.
The mens' over-reaction means they deserve jail time. HOWEVER the initial female's assault means she should be locked up ALSO.
Ray Rice's wife was spitting on him, slapping him. If a MAN spits/slaps, he goes to jail. If she does it, zero charge. That's wrong.
Charge 100% of people with assault, and it becomes a heck of a deterrant. I'm in clubs all the time - many people DO think a woman can slap a guy and get away with it - and the bar usually laughs at a man getting slapped by a woman. Let a man backhand a woman in front of the bar, you'll have 50 "heroes" stepping up to assault him".
Not true. It depends on the situation. In the Ray Rice case, he used excessive force above and beyond to "stop" whatever was supposedly done to him by her. I have seen zero evidence to indicate that she even did anything to him, so there is that also.
-
''because she's an independent woman'' - lol, is there even such a thing
I LOL'd hard at that part
-
I think we should have 100% equality. Arrest the person committing the assault. No matter the gender.
You'll have a LOT less women slapping guys. And in turn, guys won't turn into pricks like Ray Rice and over-react by punching a woman out for a stinging slap.
The mens' over-reaction means they deserve jail time. HOWEVER the initial female's assault means she should be locked up ALSO.
Ray Rice's wife was spitting on him, slapping him. If a MAN spits/slaps, he goes to jail. If she does it, zero charge. That's wrong.
Charge 100% of people with assault, and it becomes a heck of a deterrant. I'm in clubs all the time - many people DO think a woman can slap a guy and get away with it - and the bar usually laughs at a man getting slapped by a woman. Let a man backhand a woman in front of the bar, you'll have 50 "heroes" stepping up to assault him".
How can she slap?
-
I LOL'd hard at that part
Why? If someone was viewing that scenario, they might likely draw the conclusion that the man attacking the woman may be a Muslim who does not respect women as they are treated as being inferior as Islamic culture dicatates. So the statement to him that, "she is an independent woman" capable of her own thoughts, desires wishes and actions is a very good remark considering the scenario at first glance. They need to know that the poor treatment of women is not going to fly in Western culture.
-
Why? If someone was viewing that scenario, they might likely draw the conclusion that the man attacking the woman may be a Muslim who does not respect women as they are treated as being inferior as Islamic culture dicatates. So the statement to him that, "she is an independent woman" capable of her own thoughts, desires wishes and actions is a very good remark considering the scenario at first glance. They need to know that the poor treatment of women is not going to fly in Western culture.
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
-
Good on the Hebrew.
-
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
Thats funny. I rarely encounter that at all to be honest with you.
-
Thats funny. I rarely encounter that at all to be honest with you.
x2. I do not meet many women who are not working and living solely off their husband or bf. Most family's in America are dual-income households.
-
x2. I do not meet many women who are not working and living solely off their husband or bf. Most family's in America are dual-income households.
Neither of you two are around a certain type of woman.
-
Social Experiment ::)
yea douche bags social Experiment to see how many views you get , so you can get paid by youtube
Wiggs to the rescue at 1:20 mark and then fixes his cap mid rescue
According to those fuckers they're doing it to spread positivity and awareness ::) ::) ::)
Thumbs up and please SHARE for spreading positvity and awareness!
-
Thats funny. I rarely encounter that at all to be honest with you.
Thats because you have a trust fund and seldom mix with the minions ;)
-
Neither of you two are around a certain type of woman.
Clearly
-
Neither of you two are around a certain type of woman.
This isn`t the 1950s anymore "Bob". The reality is that incomes have not kept up with inflation thus making it extremely rare to have a single-income household.
You can pretend this is not the truth, but you will end up looking like an idiot when you speak.
-
Clearly
Stick to lifting weights and let other people discuss more important matters.
How many of these so-called women exist? Of course there are women who are living off their man.
However, the statistics show us that a majority of the households in America are dual-income (husband and wife work). IF you have statistics disputing this fact, provide the data.
In 2002, only 7 percent of all U.S. households consisted of married couples with children in which only the husband worked. Dual-income families with children made up more than two times as many households. Even families with two incomes and no children outnumbered the traditional family by almost two to one.
Among married-couple households, about 13 percent consisted of families with children in which only the husband worked, 31 percent were dual-income families with children, 25 percent were dual-income families with no children, and 31 percent consisted of other types of families, such as older married couples whose children no longer reside in the household.
Citation: AmeriStat, tabulations from the Census Bureau’s 2002 Current Population Survey (March Supplement).
-
Stick to lifting weights and let other people discuss more important matters.
How many of these so-called women exist? Of course there are women who are living off their man.
However, the statistics show us that a majority of the households in America are dual-income (husband and wife work). IF you have statistics disputing this fact, provide the data.
In 2002, only 7 percent of all U.S. households consisted of married couples with children in which only the husband worked. Dual-income families with children made up more than two times as many households. Even families with two incomes and no children outnumbered the traditional family by almost two to one.
Among married-couple households, about 13 percent consisted of families with children in which only the husband worked, 31 percent were dual-income families with children, 25 percent were dual-income families with no children, and 31 percent consisted of other types of families, such as older married couples whose children no longer reside in the household.
BOOM!
Enzo must spend his time hanging around drug addicts and criminals or something.
-
a lot of women have jobs which doesn't say anything at all about their independence in general
-
BOOM!
Enzo must spend his time hanging around drug addicts and criminals or something.
Or he is attracting trash.
Another statistic:
It’s more important than ever to know how to balance a marriage and a career. Between 1996 and 2006, the percentage of two-income married couples rose 31% in the US. Now, 47.5% of all American married couples are dual-career couples. In Canada, the percentage of husband-wife families that were dual earners is roughly 70%, and approximately two thirds of two-adult families have two incomes in the UK.
-
Stick to lifting weights and let other people discuss more important matters.
How many of these so-called women exist? Of course there are women who are living off their man.
However, the statistics show us that a majority of the households in America are dual-income (husband and wife work). IF you have statistics disputing this fact, provide the data.
In 2002, only 7 percent of all U.S. households consisted of married couples with children in which only the husband worked. Dual-income families with children made up more than two times as many households. Even families with two incomes and no children outnumbered the traditional family by almost two to one.
Among married-couple households, about 13 percent consisted of families with children in which only the husband worked, 31 percent were dual-income families with children, 25 percent were dual-income families with no children, and 31 percent consisted of other types of families, such as older married couples whose children no longer reside in the household.
Stick to trolling the interwebz you pathetic dork. I wasn't talking about married couples, I was speaking on the many women I know who get by off their looks.
-
a lot of women have jobs which doesn't say anything at all about their independence in general
Enzo made this comment:
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
This statement implies that women are solely living off the mans income, which is highly incorrect. This is what me and TA are disputing.
As time progresses, more women are graduating college and taking jobs that are more prestigious and more income than men. As TA said, this is not the 1950's anymore. I know men want to think it is, but they need to come to the realization that times are changing.
-
BOOM!
Enzo must spend his time hanging around drug addicts and criminals or something.
The True Gremlin probably spends his time with a flesh light and reddit
-
It's actually more a commentary on domestic violence perpetrated by women on men.
There is shock, anger and outrage when he starts physically abusing her. Men are literally fighting each other to be the first hero to intervene.
However, when she attacks the guy, people are all grinning. It's treated as frivolous and amusing. A couple of brothers jokingly join in the violence and start filming it on their phones - worldstarhiphop?.
But as the vid points out, domestic violence against men is real and quite common. If we are to have equality then it needs to extend in both directions.
-
Stick to trolling the interwebz you pathetic dork. I wasn't talking about married couples, I was speaking on the many women I know who get by off their looks.
Well, then you need to be more clear in your statement. Making a general statement such as, "Women live largely off of men" says nothing about the type of women you're referring to, now does it, genius? It is quite obvious that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Second, there is no evidence to suggest that I am a "pathetic dork." Only someone who challenges your mediocre assumptions.
Third, there is no trolling. You can quickly look up any peer reviewed journal for that statistic.
-
Well, then you need to be more clear in your statement. Making a general statement such as, "Women live largely off of men" says nothing about the type of women you're referring to, now does it, genius? It is quite obvious that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Second, there is no evidence to suggest that I am a "pathetic dork." Only someone who challenges your mediocre assumptions.
Third, there is no trolling. You can quickly look up any peer reviewed journal for that statistic.
He didnt write that, stop being disingenuous.
-
Well, then you need to be more clear in your statement. Making a general statement such as, "Women live largely off of men" says nothing about the type of women you're referring to, now does it, genius? It is quite obvious that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Second, there is no evidence to suggest that I am a "pathetic dork." Only someone who challenges your mediocre assumptions.
I don't need to be more clear on shit, you need to be less of a loser fishing for your next internet dual. And all 16k of your post speak loud and clear about your lack of existence in the real world.
-
He didnt write that, stop being disingenuous.
Actually, he did. He wrote:
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
Go to page 1.
-
I don't need to be more clear on shit, you need to be less of a loser fishing for your next internet dual. And all 16k of your post speak loud and clear about your lack of existence in the real world.
You made a statement and I commented on it. I am not too sure how that is "fishing."
Second, that is 16000 posts over a 7 year period.
Third, with the advent of technology, its really easy to post anywhere on the internet. For example, I could be taking a lunch break at work and post on GB. Or between sets, I could easily post on GB. Thus, my post count on GB has little to do with existence in the real world.
-
Actually, he did. He wrote:
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
Go to page 1.
You're clearly a dumb fuck with low comprehension skills
-
You're clearly a dumb fuck with low comprehension skills
It may be that I have low comprehension skills, though I highly doubt that is it.
It may also be that you have low articulation skills.
-
You made a statement and I commented on it. I am not too sure how that is "fishing."
Second, that is 16000 posts over a 7 year period.
Third, with the advent of technology, its really easy to post anywhere on the internet. For example, I could be taking a lunch break at work and post on GB. Or between sets, I could easily post on GB. Thus, my post count on GB has little to do with existence in the real world.
I'm not just talking about the number, I was referring to all your pessimistic drivel inside the posts
You're the type that doesn't have a life, you just watch others live their's from the bleachers
-
I'm not just talking about the number, I was referring to all your pessimistic drivel inside the posts
You're the type that doesn't have a life, you just watch others live their's from the bleachers
I am not too sure why you would think that.
Clearly, there is no correlation between someone's online persona and how they are in real life, i.e., the way we act on Getbig is most likely not identical to how we act in real life. People have many different social identities and each social identify is going to be expressed based on the context. The context of getbig, in general, tends to be cynical and pessimistic with a lot of trolling. Most of these individuals do not act like this in real life. If you want to believe that I am a low-life loser because they way I act on getbig, then that is your prerogative.
-
It's actually more a commentary on domestic violence perpetrated by women on men.
There is shock, anger and outrage when he starts physically abusing her. Men are literally fighting each other to be the first hero to intervene.
However, when she attacks the guy, people are all grinning. It's treated as frivolous and amusing. A couple of brothers jokingly join in the violence and start filming it on their phones - worldstarhiphop?.
But as the vid points out, domestic violence against men is real and quite common. If we are to have equality then it needs to extend in both directions.
As far as the law is concerned equality exists.
Its only natural to expect people to intervene when a man hits a woman and less likely to do so when a woman hits a man. Men are seen as capable of protecting themselves as they are genetically bigger, stronger and more aggressive. This is only logical.
What I find amusing is the "outcry" from "alpha" males that nobody is coming to help the man when he is getting hit by the woman. Yeah, thats real Alpha ::) and meshes perfectly with the idea that women are inferior and weak. ::)
-
It may be that I have low comprehension skills, though I highly doubt that is it.
It may also be that you have low articulation skills.
;D
-
I am not too sure why you would think that.
Clearly, there is no correlation between someone's online persona and how they are in real life, i.e., the way we act on Getbig is most likely not identical to how we act in real life. People have many different social identities and each social identify is going to be expressed based on the context. The context of getbig, in general, tends to be cynical and pessimistic with a lot of trolling. Most of these individuals do not act like this in real life. If you want to believe that I am a low-life loser because they way I act on getbig, then that is your prerogative.
It's clear as day, your life is as eventful..as the trainer is muscular.
-
Actually, he did. He wrote:
It made me think of all the oh so independent westernized women I know living largely off men
Go to page 1.
Thats not a general statement thats quite a specific statement about women he knew personally.
You fucking cretin.
-
Thats not a general statement thats quite a specific statement about women he knew personally.
You fucking cretin.
Exactly..I hope the dipshits trolling for his own sake.
-
"Why is she talking to other guys for?"
"because she's in independent woman".
Sounds like someone needs to spend some time down in the basement to get to know her place.
-
It's clear as day, your life is as eventful..as the trainer is muscular.
The Trainer, may we'll be a 250 pound beast. We don't know yet.
-
"Why is she talking to other guys for?"
"because she's in independent woman".
Sounds like someone needs to spend some time down in the basement to get to know her place.
Sounds like you are the poster boy for ISIS recruitment.
-
As far as the law is concerned equality exists.
Its only natural to expect people to intervene when a man hits a woman and less likely to do so when a woman hits a man. Men are seen as capable of protecting themselves as they are genetically bigger, stronger and more aggressive. This is only logical.
What I find amusing is the "outcry" from "alpha" males that nobody is coming to help the man when he is getting hit by the woman. Yeah, thats real Alpha ::) and meshes perfectly with the idea that women are inferior and weak. ::)
It's not simply that people come to the aid of the woman being physically attacked ( which is a good thing) but the hilarity and enjoyment people get from seeing her attacking the guy. The argument would be that both cases are equally as serious - as you yourself say, domestic violence is supposedly sexless in the eyes of the law.
That said, I think the video was flawed in that she did appear to attack with a little less malevolence.
-
Sounds like you are the poster boy for ISIS recruitment.
:-*
-
-
I feel like saying "Because she's an independent woman!" is degrading to women.
It's like a person standing up for me saying "Because he's not a dickless twink punk that you can push around".
I mean, why put it out there? Why would she need to affirm a person was independent. It should be implied by her very existence, as well as the law, common sense, etc.
IMO, too much support/assistance/reinforcement will introduce things that don't need to be intro'd. Imagine if you opened the door angrily and your woman said "But I didn't fucck him!" in reaction. Ummm sooo is there something you do want to tell me?
-
Social Experiment ::)
yea douche bags social Experiment to see how many views you get , so you can get paid by youtube
-
-
-
boring
I like this 'social experiment' though