Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on September 29, 2014, 07:34:35 AM

Title: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 29, 2014, 07:34:35 AM
Perry is screaming that the white house needs to address the beheading.

Is it terrorism?  Or some distorted idiot zealot killing someone over religion?

Should the white house address when someone who isn't a muslim kills someone over their religion?

Should they give this idiot a platform, recognize this as an international event, assign him to history, which comes from Obama saying his name?

I think destorying his life, locking him up forever, and GITMO'ing everyone he's ever had a beer with is fine.  But to give him that global recognition for a murder?   
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 29, 2014, 07:39:35 AM
No - pofs Obama has to address the Ferguson shooting at the UN instead. 

Perry is screaming that the white house needs to address the beheading.

Is it terrorism?  Or some distorted idiot zealot killing someone over religion?

Should the white house address when someone who isn't a muslim kills someone over their religion?

Should they give this idiot a platform, recognize this as an international event, assign him to history, which comes from Obama saying his name?

I think destorying his life, locking him up forever, and GITMO'ing everyone he's ever had a beer with is fine.  But to give him that global recognition for a murder?   

Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: bears on September 29, 2014, 07:42:36 AM
Perry is screaming that the white house needs to address the beheading.

Is it terrorism?  Or some distorted idiot zealot killing someone over religion?

Should the white house address when someone who isn't a muslim kills someone over their religion?

Should they give this idiot a platform, recognize this as an international event, assign him to history, which comes from Obama saying his name?

I think destorying his life, locking him up forever, and GITMO'ing everyone he's ever had a beer with is fine.  But to give him that global recognition for a murder?   


no.  the guy was an idiot.  from what I've seen he doesn't even know what Islam is. 

my opinion.  he's one of those guys who's pist at the world because he can't get laid so he latches onto the most hateful religion he can find and claims it as his own.  so now he feels a sense of righteousness for inflicting violence on people.  like he's doing it for a higher purpose then the real reason of him just being a fucking asshole.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: 240 is Back on September 29, 2014, 07:45:27 AM
No - pofs Obama has to address the Ferguson shooting at the UN instead. 


I think he's an idiot for addressing the ferguson shooting. 

That being said, I don't think he should give this random idiot the GLOBAL spotlight by saying his name.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: Archer77 on September 29, 2014, 07:52:15 AM
Obama needs to address that local mosques have a lot more to do when it comes to weeding out the type of personalities that commit these kinds of acts.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 29, 2014, 10:34:37 AM
Just because somebody doesn't fully understand Islam doesn't mean Islam is not responsible for this beheading.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: Coach is Back! on September 29, 2014, 11:18:30 AM
Perry is screaming that the white house needs to address the beheading.

Is it terrorism?  Or some distorted idiot zealot killing someone over religion?

Should the white house address when someone who isn't a muslim kills someone over their religion?

Should they give this idiot a platform, recognize this as an international event, assign him to history, which comes from Obama saying his name?

I think destorying his life, locking him up forever, and GITMO'ing everyone he's ever had a beer with is fine.  But to give him that global recognition for a murder?   


Of course not. It's work place violence. Beheaddings happen everyday in America with muslim radicals linked to their leaders....move on, Nothing to see here. If they have a problem they should just take it up with human resources.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: bears on September 30, 2014, 07:40:29 AM
Of course not. It's work place violence. Beheaddings happen everyday in America with muslim radicals linked to their leaders....move on, Nothing to see here. If they have a problem they should just take it up with human resources.
  true.  they need to fill out a Form BH.  I think you can electronically file this form starting in 2015.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: Archer77 on September 30, 2014, 07:51:11 AM
Was there any doubt  this incident would be considered workplace violence?  I predicted this immediately after it happened.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 30, 2014, 11:15:29 AM
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/09/30/prosecutor-co-worker-had-altercation-with-beheading-suspect-about-him-not-liking-white-people


Obama now definitely wont address this since this guy is a fellow muslim racist who hates white people
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: tu_holmes on September 30, 2014, 11:16:54 AM
No - pofs Obama has to address the Ferguson shooting at the UN instead. 


Agree... for him to address one and not the other is ridiculous.
Title: Re: Should the white house address the beheading?
Post by: George Whorewell on October 01, 2014, 04:42:35 AM
Obama should only focus on Ferguson and the guy who made the "truth about muslims" youtube video.