Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 07:26:57 AM

Title: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 07:26:57 AM
(http://s1.postimg.org/3r1dfcne7/skinny_ripped.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: BigRo on October 25, 2014, 07:38:39 AM
not big enough for the woman behind to take notice...
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 07:40:13 AM
not big enough for the woman behind to take notice...
I dont suppose hes all that disappointed.  ;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Cutlet767 on October 25, 2014, 07:43:38 AM
.....The sad reality of natural bodybuilding for 99% of people.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: IronMeister on October 25, 2014, 07:43:53 AM
(http://i59.tinypic.com/28wkzdt.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 07:50:28 AM
not big enough for the woman behind to take notice...
x2

you need to look real sick just standing relaxed

cant be hitting poses in the club can you
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: gracie bjj on October 25, 2014, 07:52:17 AM
little to lean for my taste though,imo he could still pack on another 12 lbs n be just as hard and fuller,its cool as long as hes happy with it thats all that matters at the end of the day
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 07:53:27 AM
x2

you need to look real sick just standing relaxed

cant be hitting poses in the club can you
Exactly, the only pose that really matters in real life is the standing relaxed pose
Anyone doing bicep shots in a club is automatically a douhe

Although I sense you have perfected the one arm holding a beer bottle pose.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Nick Danger on October 25, 2014, 07:59:45 AM
'Anyone doing bicep shots in a club is automatically a douhe'

I think that falls under the category of 'it goes without saying'.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: gracie bjj on October 25, 2014, 08:00:10 AM
Exactly, the only pose that really matters in real life is the standing relaxed pose
Anyone doing bicep shots in a club is automatically a douhe

Although I sense you have perfected the one arm holding a beer bottle pose.

he also perfected the tying the shoe laces pose as well as peaking the biceps while talking on the cell phone ;)hes got it it down to a science and thats the way to do it
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: affeman on October 25, 2014, 08:19:51 AM
That's the way to look when ur goal is the attention from the ladies

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=553110.0;attach=584051;image)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Sophus on October 25, 2014, 08:25:13 AM
He would probably look ok if he started training legs

Upper body isnt even that small, just flat and super shredded
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: gracie bjj on October 25, 2014, 08:26:00 AM
That's the way to look when ur goal is the attention from the ladies

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=553110.0;attach=584051;image)

thats the way u look if u want local gym rats kissing your ass but the ladies? i doubt it,hes just to big for most womens taste,i did say MOST cause theres always gonna be afew that love the mass monsters.most women go for the bob paris look or benfatto type

Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 08:27:23 AM
like Simon says (no pun intended) this is the only pose that matters.

ahalo- forget the quest for 18" arms. if you don't look good standing relaxed you'll never get the chocolate honeys.

the king of the standing relaxed pose.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:38:23 AM
Exactly, the only pose that really matters in real life is the standing relaxed pose
Anyone doing bicep shots in a club is automatically a douhe

Although I sense you have perfected the one arm holding a beer bottle pose.
i agree

sometimes holding a dring with your arm in some whores face is acceptable tho

as long as you relax once in a while too ::)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 08:40:36 AM
like Simon says (no pun intended) this is the only pose that matters.

ahalo- forget the quest for 18" arms. if you don't look good standing relaxed you'll never get the chocolate honeys.

the king of the standing relaxed pose.
Nubresque pose right there

I used to stand like this in clubs
(http://s30.postimg.org/drf5kw8wx/Screen_Shot_2014_10_25_at_16_38_48.png)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:41:42 AM
like Simon says (no pun intended) this is the only pose that matters.

ahalo- forget the quest for 18" arms. if you don't look good standing relaxed you'll never get the chocolate honeys.

the king of the standing relaxed pose.
the whole point of increasing arm size is so they will look big relaxed


any twink with definition can look "jacked" flexing in the right lighting


but it takes a monster to look freakish relaxed and without a pump i might add (dont get angry but you are pumped as hell there)


this is why we must all tirelessly work towards the ideal life form
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:42:27 AM
The "holding a beer" pose is difficult to master. You need to apply enough tension that there is clear muscular contraction and separation, but not so much that you EVER shake from effort, for then the illusion is lost.

Clothing choice is crucial too. No douchebag tight shirts. Casually tight, like "what can I do, the arm holes are too small" shirts.

You also need to make sure that your dominant arm always faces the honeys, which can be awkward if it has you facing a wall. Room location is likewise critical.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 08:44:24 AM
The "holding a beer" pose is difficult to master. You need to apply enough tension that there is clear muscular contraction and separation, but not so much that you EVER shake from effort, for then the illusion is lost.

Clothing choice is crucial too. No douchebag tight shirts. Casually tight, like "what can I do, the arm holes are too small" shirts.

You also need to make sure that your dominant arm always faces the honeys, which can be awkward if it has you facing a wall. Room location is likewise critical.

lemme help you.

text book form.

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 08:45:01 AM
The "holding a beer" pose is difficult to master. You need to apply enough tension that there is clear muscular contraction and separation, but not so much that you EVER shake from effort, for then the illusion is lost.

Clothing choice is crucial too. No douchebag tight shirts. Casually tight, like "what can I do, the arm holes are too small" shirts.

You also need to make sure that your dominant arm always faces the honeys, which can be awkward if it has you facing a wall. Room location is likewise critical.
Go4it is the master

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=436826.0;attach=480943;image)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:46:24 AM
Go4it is the master

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=436826.0;attach=480943;image)

That is a quality effort right there.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:46:59 AM
The "holding a beer" pose is difficult to master. You need to apply enough tension that there is clear muscular contraction and separation, but not so much that you EVER shake from effort, for then the illusion is lost.

Clothing choice is crucial too. No douchebag tight shirts. Casually tight, like "what can I do, the arm holes are too small" shirts.

You also need to make sure that your dominant arm always faces the honeys, which can be awkward if it has you facing a wall. Room location is likewise critical.
i mastered this pose, its also about the delicate balance between tricep and bicep flexion, if you relax triceps you are gone, boom, out of the picture, at least when i am in the same club


too tight shirts are horrible for a narrow bb like my self

the ideal t shirt is sort of baggy but not too baggy and snug aroun the arms, that will give me a good thick traps look with big arms and overall the t shirt looks relaxed not tight


tight t shirts can only work on wide and super jacked like maybe that ulyses erection dude

Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 08:47:25 AM
the whole point of increasing arm size is so they will look big relaxed


any twink with definition can look "jacked" flexing in the right lighting


but it takes a monster to look freakish relaxed and without a pump i might add (dont get angry but you are pumped as hell there)


this is why we must all tirelessly work towards the ideal life form


lol why would I get angry?

let me know when you look that good standing relaxed and we'll chat.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 08:47:27 AM
lemme help you.

text book form.

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.
You look like Lee Powell.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/7992/350/d/img_38161254013184.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:48:15 AM
i mastered this pose, its also about the delicate balance between tricep and bicep flexion, if you relax triceps you are gone, boom, out of the picture, at least when i am in the same club


too tight shirts are horrible for a narrow bb like my self

the ideal t shirt is sort of baggy but not too baggy and snug aroun the arms, that will give me a good thick traps look with big arms and overall the t shirt looks relaxed not tight


tight t shirts can only work on wide and super jacked like maybe that ulyses erection dude



You are the clear master of this pose, no homo. If I actually went to clubs, I would emulate.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 08:48:38 AM
You look like Lee Powell.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/7992/350/d/img_38161254013184.jpg)

yup theres def a similarity there.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:49:07 AM
lemme help you.

text book form.

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.

Chiseled jawline.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:49:43 AM

lol why would I get angry?

let me know when you look that good standing relaxed and we'll chat.

you seem angry tho

you are making this about you vs me

just because i am saying you are no coleman
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:51:30 AM
You are the clear master of this pose, no homo. If I actually went to clubs, I would emulate.
because i was natural for so long i am also an expert in bodybuilding photography

naturals will leave no stone unturned in the quest to actually look like they even lift
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:53:33 AM
because i was natural for so long i am also an expert in bodybuilding photography

naturals will leave no stone unturned in the quest to actually look like they even lift

Also this pose really requires dominating triceps, which you have. My fucking tris are in hiding.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:54:56 AM
Also this pose really requires dominating triceps, which you have. My fucking tris are in hiding.
i believe in close grip benching

i think its the best exercise for triceps


i cant be sure tho since i do so many exercises
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: _aj_ on October 25, 2014, 08:56:16 AM
i believe in close grip benching

i think its the best exercise for triceps


i cant be sure tho since i do so many exercises

I've really jacked the volume and weights on tris to coax them out. Nothing to report yet  :-\
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 08:58:38 AM
I've really jacked the volume and weights on tris to coax them out. Nothing to report yet  :-\
give it some time and dont stop believing

believing it will work means your halfway there :D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 09:02:33 AM
you seem angry tho

you are making this about you vs me

just because i am saying you are no coleman

no I'm not. lol

a lot of people here like to critique others w/o having anything better to back it up. that annoys me. then when you do insult someone, feelings subsequently get hurt.

 I don't want to look like ronnie Coleman dude. I think your the only person in the history of the fucking world that for some misguided reason thinks that looking like ronnie Coleman is the holy grail of pursuits cause it'll get women. it doesn't get women. it only attracts other guys. dorks who want to know how much you bench and how can they get that big.  

I'm just trying to help you. your misguided. you post up a pic w a one girl standing beside a famous ronnie Coleman saying 'this is what gets honies'

I post a pic of my unfamous self wearing a T shirt  surrounded by girls and actually-wait a minute- talking to them! and it's looks like we're all having fun! holy fuck. meanwhile every retarded body body who thinks big nusckezzzzz is the be all end all to getting girls is standing in the corner w their buddy looking like an awkward dork wondering why no girls are around them.

do the math kid. I'm trying to save you future embarrassing moments like that cause you are seriously deluded.

if you can't get girls now looking like you do, getting bigger will just make you look and feel like a bigger loser when your standing there wondering why no bonies to talking to poor halo w his tricep flexed holding his beer. fuck no wonder you can't get women. you don't have a clue.

no need to thank me for this very good advise.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: gracie bjj on October 25, 2014, 09:03:28 AM
give it some time and dont stop believing

believing it will work means your halfway there :D

thats true man,having total belief in what u r doing makes u work harder and get better results
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 09:07:03 AM
no I'm not. lol

a lot of people here like to critique others w/o having anything better to back it up. that annoys me. then when you do insult someone, feelings subsequently get hurt.

I don't want to look like ronnie Coleman dude. I think your the only person in the history of the fucking world that for some misguided reason thinks that looking like ronnie Coleman is the holy grail of pursuits cause it'll get women. it doesn't get women. it only attracts other guys. dorks who want to know how much you bench and how can they get that big.  

I'm just trying to help you. your misguided. you post up a pic w a one girl standing beside a famous ronnie Coleman saying 'this is what gets honies'

I post a pic of my unfamous self wearing a T shirt  surrounded by girls and actually- holy fuck- talking to them! and it's looks like we're all having fun! holy fuck. meanwhile every retarded body body who thinks big nusckezzzzz is the be all end all to getting girls is standing in the corner w their buddy looking like an awkward dork wondering why no girls are around them.

do the math kid. I'm trying to save you future embarrassing moments like that cause you are seriously deluded.

if you can't get girls now looking like you do, getting bigger will just make you look and feel like a bigger loser.

no need to thank me for this very good advise.
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/2011/05/pumped_kid.gif)

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)
(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/3652146/ronnie-coleman-it-ain-t-hot-o.gif)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 09:09:17 AM


lol fuck your a funny dude at times I'll give you that. :)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 09:10:49 AM

lol fuck your a funny dude at times I'll give you that. :)
;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 09:12:34 AM
if i ever get to see RDC in real life again i will ask him what he really ate most of the year

some of his videos are conflicting


in some interviews he said "in the off season i just eat whatever i want"

 ???


"Hello Ronald Dean Coleman, allow me to introduce myself. I am anabolic halo, VP of the RDC fan club EMEA. I would like to ask some off the record dietary questions ........................ ."


wonder how he'd react ???
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Simple Simon on October 25, 2014, 09:27:39 AM
no I'm not. lol

a lot of people here like to critique others w/o having anything better to back it up. that annoys me. then when you do insult someone, feelings subsequently get hurt.

 I don't want to look like ronnie Coleman dude. I think your the only person in the history of the fucking world that for some misguided reason thinks that looking like ronnie Coleman is the holy grail of pursuits cause it'll get women. it doesn't get women. it only attracts other guys. dorks who want to know how much you bench and how can they get that big.  

I'm just trying to help you. your misguided. you post up a pic w a one girl standing beside a famous ronnie Coleman saying 'this is what gets honies'

I post a pic of my unfamous self wearing a T shirt  surrounded by girls and actually-wait a minute- talking to them! and it's looks like we're all having fun! holy fuck. meanwhile every retarded body body who thinks big nusckezzzzz is the be all end all to getting girls is standing in the corner w their buddy looking like an awkward dork wondering why no girls are around them.

do the math kid. I'm trying to save you future embarrassing moments like that cause you are seriously deluded.

if you can't get girls now looking like you do, getting bigger will just make you look and feel like a bigger loser when your standing there wondering why no bonies to talking to poor halo w his tricep flexed holding his beer. fuck no wonder you can't get women. you don't have a clue.

no need to thank me for this very good advise.

 ;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 09:28:30 AM
Dean says that bodybuilding is all about scientific knowledge

Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: SuperTed on October 25, 2014, 11:24:52 AM
Go4it is the master

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=436826.0;attach=480943;image)

Go4It tenses in every pic that's taken. He probably has never "stood relaxed" in a club.

Guys like no one would look the best. Tall, lean and big while still maintaining an athletic look.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Disgusted on October 25, 2014, 11:39:24 AM
Rather see this than the bloated sponges we are seeing at the pro level.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: BigRo on October 25, 2014, 12:06:52 PM
The "holding a beer" pose is difficult to master. You need to apply enough tension that there is clear muscular contraction and separation, but not so much that you EVER shake from effort, for then the illusion is lost.

Clothing choice is crucial too. No douchebag tight shirts. Casually tight, like "what can I do, the arm holes are too small" shirts.

You also need to make sure that your dominant arm always faces the honeys, which can be awkward if it has you facing a wall. Room location is likewise critical.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: MAXX on October 25, 2014, 12:10:26 PM
ye ripped but ugly physique
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: funk51 on October 25, 2014, 12:18:24 PM
 ;D bane was 235 lbs now only 160 lbs.up from 140. bruce randall 415 down to 232 up from 183.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 12:55:01 PM


fuck i just lold well played sir. :D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: the trainer on October 25, 2014, 12:55:28 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-kkadrbP0RVc/UfSQFMzAqII/AAAAAAAAAqA/Ocl-utQ0zxc/s320/shirt+that+makes+arms+look+bigger.jpeg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: bradistani on October 25, 2014, 12:58:17 PM
for some, there's no compromise
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/bcdc461b107b2d1693aa2e4e773bd9be/tumblr_nc4k8lvSN01rmu5kgo1_500.gif)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: the trainer on October 25, 2014, 01:10:27 PM
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6cszk-CAl-g/Ub-BHXGtmFI/AAAAAAAAIxc/p1xQIkpqT5Q/s640/318614_268714849924373_1139326389_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: the trainer on October 25, 2014, 01:11:40 PM
(http://falseyedee.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/1017600_359592974169893_1586612052_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Thin Lizzy on October 25, 2014, 01:37:23 PM
For the fibers near the elbow, the ones that can be seen when wearing a short sleeve shirt, I believe this is the best exercise:

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Q_qgSBdwwds/T-skUhDbQwI/AAAAAAAAAnQ/v33rZJz-LCA/s1600/triceps_extensions.png)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: The Scott on October 25, 2014, 01:56:15 PM
BAZINGA!

(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/fz42.jpg)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Bevo on October 25, 2014, 02:35:13 PM
like Simon says (no pun intended) this is the only pose that matters.

ahalo- forget the quest for 18" arms. if you don't look good standing relaxed you'll never get the chocolate honeys.

the king of the standing relaxed pose.

Wish I was that tank top
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Bevo on October 25, 2014, 02:42:52 PM
Go4It tenses in every pic that's taken. He probably has never "stood relaxed" in a club.

Guys like no one would look the best. Tall, lean and big while still maintaining an athletic look.

Truth is go4it would be overshadowed by noone's 6'2 height

Go4it needs to stop shopping his clothes in the kids section
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: dyslexic on October 25, 2014, 03:02:44 PM
The dude is shredded as fuck... like Bruce Lee style, but.....


The "emaciated" look still has a little Auschwitz concentration camp-look to it ~
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 03:53:42 PM
Truth is go4it would be overshadowed by noone's 6'2 height

Go4it needs to stop shopping his clothes in the kids section
gay 4 it is the perfect example of "tight shirts gone wrong"

it actually makes him look worse
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: cephissus on October 25, 2014, 04:26:46 PM
lemme help you.

text book form.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=553845.0;attach=585629;image)

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.

is this you ???
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 04:37:58 PM
is this you ???
dude in the white t shirt with ballcap
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Palpatine Q on October 25, 2014, 05:00:25 PM
gay 4 it is the perfect example of "tight shirts gone wrong"

it actually makes him look worse

"tight shirts gone wrong"

HAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA,.....THAT is fucking funny.  ;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Irongrip400 on October 25, 2014, 05:00:43 PM
(http://s1.postimg.org/3r1dfcne7/skinny_ripped.jpg)

Still wider than...
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 05:03:57 PM
"tight shirts gone wrong"

HAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA,.....THAT is fucking funny.  ;D
i swear it makes narrow tits look even narrower and more insignificant

sure it sort of "highlights" the arms but only in a sad way
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Sophus on October 25, 2014, 05:25:41 PM
lemme help you.

text book form.

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=553845.0;attach=585629;image)


Somehow these 3 women are 6"2
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: hazbin on October 25, 2014, 05:30:25 PM
(http://s1.postimg.org/3r1dfcne7/skinny_ripped.jpg)

finally a woman that isn't afraid to go topless
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 25, 2014, 05:32:18 PM
this dude would look like a serious junkie in clothes
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: hazbin on October 25, 2014, 09:51:35 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Primemuscle on October 25, 2014, 09:56:13 PM
not big enough for the woman behind to take notice...

Yeah this appears to be the case, but would you really want her taking notice?
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Primemuscle on October 25, 2014, 09:58:45 PM
(http://s1.postimg.org/3r1dfcne7/skinny_ripped.jpg)

This looks like too big a sacrifice.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 25, 2014, 11:15:15 PM
Somehow these 3 women are 6"2


the one to my right is wearing wedges and is closer to the camera as is her friend. the one w the tats is standing on a day bed.

no need to thank me for responding- i'd hate to have this mystery keep you awake.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Kim Jong Bob on October 25, 2014, 11:23:00 PM
lemme help you.

text book form.

I don't talk to hear my own voice- told you I'm the king of this shit.
well done no one..thw girl on the left looks so horny when she is looking on you
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 26, 2014, 01:49:10 AM
;)
epic tricep right there


reeeeeeeeel thick
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: BigRo on October 26, 2014, 01:53:45 AM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.



Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on October 26, 2014, 03:16:20 AM
;)

Good everyday look when destroying people in barfights.  ;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: local hero on October 26, 2014, 05:15:38 AM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.





Epic 'gym bag' in the corner...
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 26, 2014, 05:18:02 AM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.




this is a build that would drive the women in the clubs insane


the shredded twinkies in their tight "large" t shirts would be real mad too

i can imagine them talking in eachothers ear

LOL WHAT A PRETENDER ALL BLOAT WE GOT THAT HIGH PERFORMANCE TISSUE FIBERS


Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: gracie bjj on October 26, 2014, 05:18:34 AM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.





damn :o thats a bigboy right there,he got it all,legs and upper body
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: funk51 on October 26, 2014, 07:17:51 AM
 ;D
For the fibers near the elbow, the ones that can be seen when wearing a short sleeve shirt, I believe this is the best exercise:

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Q_qgSBdwwds/T-skUhDbQwI/AAAAAAAAAnQ/v33rZJz-LCA/s1600/triceps_extensions.png)
;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 26, 2014, 07:31:44 AM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.






big fucking dude.

dude you have great natural shape. good bellies. proportion. I don't know what you want to do with your career, but you have a structure and the way the muscle sit on it that is god given. no amount of training will give someone that shape or look.

guys throw away that gift in chasing the card. and being competitive. fouad abiad comes to mind. when he won the Nats he had a great complete physique. it just liked like the kind of physique someone would want up have, and if not want it, at least appreciate it.

have you see him now? he plays the size game and that physique is gone forever.

Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Parker on October 26, 2014, 07:35:29 AM

big fucking dude.

dude you have great natural shape. good bellies. proportion. I don't know what you want to do with your career, but you have a structure and the way the muscle sit on it that is god given. no amount of training will give someone that shape or look.

guys throw away that gift in chasing the card. and being competitive. fouad abiad comes to mind. when he won the Nats he had a great complete physique. it just liked like the kind of physique someone would want up have, and if not want it, at least appreciate it.

have you see him now? he plays the size game and that physique is gone forever.


Fouad looked great...and then His waist blew out th sides like a balloon.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: no one on October 26, 2014, 07:36:39 AM


yessir.

Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Kim Jong Bob on October 26, 2014, 12:51:05 PM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.




sick
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: MAXX on October 26, 2014, 12:54:11 PM
you get props these days if you come in ripped even if you end up looking like a twink. Thats what the mens bikini is all about.

If I want to be a twink I would just go for the yoga body.




u get any pussy with that look?
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: Ropo on October 26, 2014, 12:58:00 PM
(http://s1.postimg.org/3r1dfcne7/skinny_ripped.jpg)

That is a phrase they use when they has been training years without any gains, like for example T.A could say, if he would have a condition for it  ;D
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: dustin on October 26, 2014, 01:01:12 PM
Guy in the OP is insanely shredded but still small... can't get over that. A bit bigger but still shredded is my ideal physique. Not so extreme with the dieting and being small, nor is it so extreme with the drugs and pounding down calories 24/7.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: BigRo on October 26, 2014, 01:02:30 PM
u get any pussy with that look?

I have a live at home variety.
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: anabolichalo on October 26, 2014, 01:38:17 PM
I have a live at home variety.
she high maintanance ? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 

 ???
Title: Re: Sacrificing size for condition?
Post by: BigRo on October 26, 2014, 03:32:07 PM
no very much opposite.