Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 29, 2014, 05:56:34 AM
-
It's ok to flat out murder...
http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/19896/
-
Like capital punishment or war?
LOL. Coach, this article seems like a bunch of hooey.
Liberals saying that killing kids up until the age of 4 should be OK? WTF?
You will seriously believe anything, won't you?
-
Like capital punishment or war?
LOL. Coach, this article seems like a bunch of hooey.
Liberals saying that killing kids up until the age of 4 should be OK? WTF?
You will seriously believe anything, won't you?
saying that people are OK with killing 5 year olds is a tad ridiculous for 2014 but it's also silly to think that it won't escalate. everything does. if you told a pro choice person in the 1970's that we would have over 1 million abortions per year in the US they would have laughed at you.
But I could definitely see society growing comfortable with the idea of killing a 1 day old. I mean a 1 day old kid doesn't know what the fuck is happening. So once they allow that first 1 day old to be terminated, then why not a 2 day old? and so on.....
physiologically there is practically zero difference between a one day old and a baby in the 6th month of gestation. so I tend to think that post birth abortion will happen at some point in the future.
I mean you give me a solid argument as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago.
-
saying that people are OK with killing 5 year olds is a tad ridiculous for 2014 but it's also silly to think that it won't escalate. everything does. if you told a pro choice person in the 1970's that we would have over 1 million abortions per year in the US they would have laughed at you.
But I could definitely see society growing comfortable with the idea of killing a 1 day old. I mean a 1 day old kid doesn't know what the fuck is happening. So once they allow that first 1 day old to be terminated, then why not a 2 day old? and so on.....
physiologically there is practically zero difference between a one day old and a baby in the 6th month of gestation. so I tend to think that post birth abortion will happen at some point in the future.
I mean you give me a solid argument as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago.
I'm not in favor of late-term abortions being legal unless there's a pretty good chance the mother will die.
I don't think post-birth "abortions" in the USA are at all likely when there are so many folks who want to adopt.
The only reason I can think of for why folks might do this is because they find out late that the unborn baby is grossly defective in some way. I think, though, that kind of thing can be identified before the 6th month now, though, can't it?
-
I'm not in favor of late-term abortions being legal unless there's a pretty good chance the mother will die.
I don't think post-birth "abortions" in the USA are at all likely when there are so many folks who want to adopt.
The only reason I can think of for why folks might do this is because they find out late that the unborn baby is grossly defective in some way. I think, though, that kind of thing can be identified before the 6th month now, though, can't it?
the pro choice movement in the 1970's thought pretty much just like you and I do now. Their heart was in the right place and they saw abortion as a last resort and a way to help someone in dire need. But it's a different world now. Here's how a pro choice person in 2014 would respond to you:
I'm not in favor of late-term abortions being legal unless there's a pretty good chance the mother will die.
who the fuck are YOU to tell ME when I can and cannot have an abortion?
and yeah most everything can be detected now but a lot of people just don't go through all of the prenatal care that their doctors recommend. and again they will say, "who the fuck are YOU to tell ME when I can and cannot have an abortion?"
-
saying that people are OK with killing 5 year olds is a tad ridiculous for 2014 but it's also silly to think that it won't escalate. everything does. if you told a pro choice person in the 1970's that we would have over 1 million abortions per year in the US they would have laughed at you.
But I could definitely see society growing comfortable with the idea of killing a 1 day old. I mean a 1 day old kid doesn't know what the fuck is happening. So once they allow that first 1 day old to be terminated, then why not a 2 day old? and so on.....
physiologically there is practically zero difference between a one day old and a baby in the 6th month of gestation. so I tend to think that post birth abortion will happen at some point in the future.
I mean you give me a solid argument as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago.
I'm sure you believe that
I'm sure you believe a lot of other crazy shit too
-
saying that people are OK with killing 5 year olds is a tad ridiculous for 2014 but it's also silly to think that it won't escalate. everything does. if you told a pro choice person in the 1970's that we would have over 1 million abortions per year in the US they would have laughed at you.
But I could definitely see society growing comfortable with the idea of killing a 1 day old. I mean a 1 day old kid doesn't know what the fuck is happening. So once they allow that first 1 day old to be terminated, then why not a 2 day old? and so on.....
physiologically there is practically zero difference between a one day old and a baby in the 6th month of gestation. so I tend to think that post birth abortion will happen at some point in the future.
I mean you give me a solid argument as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago.
There really is no difference between a full-term newborn and a 1 hour or 1 day old baby. No logical distinction between killing a baby an hour or day before or after delivery. Not a large leap at all for pro abortion extremists to condone something like that.
Isn't there a Princeton professor who advocates something close to this? Cannot remember if it's the same issue, but loco has posted articles about him.
-
Like capital punishment or war?
LOL. Coach, this article seems like a bunch of hooey.
Liberals saying that killing kids up until the age of 4 should be OK? WTF?
You will seriously believe anything, won't you?
haha capital punishment is not murder there boss....murder is the taking of someones life without cause or provocation....
the death penalty is a direct result of an action the person being put to death has committed....
-
haha capital punishment is not murder there boss....murder is the taking of someones life without cause or provocation....
the death penalty is a direct result of an action the person being put to death has committed....
I didn't even read that. lol RRKore are you seriously calling capital punishment and war deaths murder?
-
I didn't even read that. lol RRKore are you seriously calling capital punishment and war deaths murder?
I love it when bleeding heart libtards try to say that capital punishment is murder
-
I didn't even read that. lol RRKore are you seriously calling capital punishment and war deaths murder?
No but I'm comparing the "murder" Coach talks about to it. All those things are about killing humans, it seems to me.
-
the pro choice movement in the 1970's thought pretty much just like you and I do now. Their heart was in the right place and they saw abortion as a last resort and a way to help someone in dire need. But it's a different world now. Here's how a pro choice person in 2014 would respond to you:
I'm not in favor of late-term abortions being legal unless there's a pretty good chance the mother will die.
who the fuck are YOU to tell ME when I can and cannot have an abortion?
and yeah most everything can be detected now but a lot of people just don't go through all of the prenatal care that their doctors recommend. and again they will say, "who the fuck are YOU to tell ME when I can and cannot have an abortion?"
I guess I'd answer such people by telling them I'm not telling them when they can have an abortion when I give my opinion about when an abortion isn't appropriate.
-
haha capital punishment is not murder there boss....murder is the taking of someones life without cause or provocation....
the death penalty is a direct result of an action the person being put to death has committed....
What state are you from again? LOL. Just messin' with ya.
I agree with you; "Murder" is the name of a certain type of crime whereby someone kills at least one person.
Capital punishment refers to the lawful taking of someone's life by the government.
-
What state are you from again? LOL. Just messin' with ya.
I agree with you; "Murder" is the name of a certain type of crime whereby someone kills at least one person.
Capital punishment refers to the lawful taking of someone's life by the government.
murder and capital punishment are not the same thing my friend
-
No but I'm comparing the "murder" Coach talks about to it. All those things are about killing humans, it seems to me.
You are comparing killing a newborn baby with capital punishment and war deaths?
The article also references killing kids up to age four. Same comparison?
-
You are comparing killing a newborn baby with capital punishment and war deaths?
The article also references killing kids up to age four. Same comparison?
Yes I am. Both are killing humans.
I understand that you have some odd ideas about what should and shouldn't be compared, though.
Didn't you say the intoxicants alcohol and weed shouldn't be compared?
Didn't you say the contagious diseases Ebola and Rabies shouldn't be compared?
Riddle me this, BB. What kind of things are ok to compare in your curious world?
-
Yes I am. Both are killing humans.
I understand that you have some odd ideas about what should and shouldn't be compared, though.
Didn't you say the intoxicants alcohol and weed shouldn't be compared?
Didn't you say the contagious diseases Ebola and Rabies shouldn't be compared?
Riddle me this, BB. What kind of things are ok to compare in your curious world?
You lack common sense.
-
You lack common sense.
Intellectuals like you and Coach love that one.
Is it OK to compare the two of you? lol
-
Intellectuals like you and Coach love that one.
Is it OK to compare the two of you? lol
It's because it's true. Libs do lack commonsense.
-
It's because it's true. Libs do lack commonsense.
Is it common sense to want to home-school your young teenager just because you don't want her to learn about other religions in her world history class?
How about you, Coach? 'Fess up now; Do you sometimes lack common sense?
-
Is it common sense to want to home-school your young teenager just because you don't want her to learn about other religions in her world history class?
How about you, Coach? 'Fess up now; Do you sometimes lack common sense?
Sometimes?
-
I'm sure you believe that
I'm sure you believe a lot of other crazy shit too
so aborting a baby 7 months into gestation is OK. but killing a baby that was born 1 minute ago is "crazy shit" to you????????
give me a solid argument based on science as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago. why is it ok to kill the former?
and a baby that survives an abortion. do you think its ok to kill that baby? or do you think the doctor should be obligated to provide life saving procedures for that baby? is killing that baby "crazy shit" too?
-
You are comparing killing a newborn baby with capital punishment and war deaths?
The article also references killing kids up to age four. Same comparison?
a lot of people believe that life is life. we have no right to take the life of anyone. regardless of the offense.
-
Intellectuals like you and Coach love that one.
Is it OK to compare the two of you? lol
Because I am a gentleman, I have to fight the urge to call you a simpleton (or your actual name Simpleton Simon) nearly every single time I respond to one of your posts. It's challenging. :) True story bro.
-
a lot of people believe that life is life. we have no right to take the life of anyone. regardless of the offense.
It is a very complicated subject, but there is a lot of intellectual dishonesty on both sides of the issue. The way I've always framed it is: the woman's right to choose whether or not to kill her baby.
-
Is it common sense to want to home-school your young teenager just because you don't want her to learn about other religions in her world history class?
How about you, Coach? 'Fess up now; Do you sometimes lack common sense?
Yes...it is. Do you think this is an isolated incident?
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/27147749/marine-banned-from-daughters-school-dispute-islam-homework-assignment
-
so aborting a baby 7 months into gestation is OK. but killing a baby that was born 1 minute ago is "crazy shit" to you????????
give me a solid argument based on science as to why its OK to kill a baby 7 months into gestation but not a baby that was born 1 minute ago. why is it ok to kill the former?
and a baby that survives an abortion. do you think its ok to kill that baby? or do you think the doctor should be obligated to provide life saving procedures for that baby? is killing that baby "crazy shit" too?
don't most states limit is to no more than 20 weeks (and others 24 weeks) other than in cases where the mothers life is at risk
aren't the vast majority of abortions done much sooner than that?
If you want to fantasize about the future then be my guest
Like I said, I'm sure you believe a lot of crazy shit
-
Yes...it is. Do you think this is an isolated incident?
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/story/27147749/marine-banned-from-daughters-school-dispute-islam-homework-assignment
No, I don't suspect you lacking common sense is an isolated incident. lol
(I'm sure that if you chose to be open and honest you'd say you HAVE done some stuff that totally lacked any kind of sense and I'm also sure it'd be pretty fun to hear about.)
Seriously, though, is what an isolated incident? Banning a parent from the school his or her kid attends? Or an idiot parent going off half-cocked because he hears a buzzword that he takes out of context? Something else?
-
It is a very complicated subject, but there is a lot of intellectual dishonesty on both sides of the issue. The way I've always framed it is: the woman's right to choose whether or not to kill her baby.
Holy fuck!! We agree on this one.
Must not be so complicated...
-
Because I am a gentleman, I have to fight the urge to call you a simpleton (or your actual name Simpleton Simon) nearly every single time I respond to one of your posts. It's challenging. :) True story bro.
This is so fascinating; Pray tell, what other urges do you have to fight off?
Maybe you could just treat us all to a free-form rendering of your thoughts stream-of-consciousness-style?
Pretty please? lol
(Seriously, your posts are like those green-text posts from 4Chan sometimes and I think it's as entertaining as hell.)
-
don't most states limit is to no more than 20 weeks (and others 24 weeks) other than in cases where the mothers life is at risk
aren't the vast majority of abortions done much sooner than that?
If you want to fantasize about the future then be my guest
Like I said, I'm sure you believe a lot of crazy shit
it all varies by state.
but to answer your questions it's roughly 10,000 babies a year are killed in the US after their 20th week.
but you still didn't answer the question. why?
you're the one who says that killing a baby 1 minute old is "crazy shit". all i did was ask you to explain why that's crazy to you.
-
Holy fuck!! We agree on this one.
Must not be so complicated...
Have to reevaluate. Anytime a simpleton agrees with me I have to question my viewpoint.
-
This is so fascinating; Pray tell, what other urges do you have to fight off?
Maybe you could just treat us all to a free-form rendering of your thoughts stream-of-consciousness-style?
Pretty please? lol
(Seriously, your posts are like those green-text posts from 4Chan sometimes and I think it's as entertaining as hell.)
You want more? Your posts are incredibly boring. You're not funny, but try to be. You're not very bright, but try way too hard to sound smart. I feel like stabbing myself in the eyeballs when I read some of the stuff you post.
Is that enough?
-
You want more? Your posts are incredibly boring. You're not funny, but try to be. You're not very bright, but try way too hard to sound smart. I feel like stabbing myself in the eyeballs when I read some of the stuff you post.
Is that enough?
lol
-
You want more? Your posts are incredibly boring. You're not funny, but try to be. You're not very bright, but try way too hard to sound smart. I feel like stabbing myself in the eyeballs when I read some of the stuff you post.
Is that enough?
How about he takes the internets too seriously for $500, Alex?
-
How about he takes the internets too seriously for $500, Alex?
Ding! :)
-
You want more? Your posts are incredibly boring. You're not funny, but try to be. You're not very bright, but try way too hard to sound smart. I feel like stabbing myself in the eyeballs when I read some of the stuff you post.
Is that enough?
I DO try to be funny -- It's a "concerted" (lol) effort on my part to show that a lot of your opinions are laughable.
As far as trying to "sound smart", I don't know exactly what you mean. Maybe you could try to be entertaining by explaining?
It's probably immature of me but fuck it, I get a kick out of it when a guy your age resorts to insults and name-calling just because it's pointed out that some of your opinions are a little wacky. You might as well just say "uncle" and wave a white flag, lol.
It seems to me that you'll go to funny lengths in an effort to not be proven wrong here on this forum. Besides calling names, another of your go-to moves is when you deliberately put your head in the sand by refusing to listen or read something that supports the argument of someone who disagrees with you. As another poster here astutely put it, you often refuse to process new information when it hurts your argument.
Makes me wonder if you could possibly be a stand-up guy IRL, actually. You remind me of one of those guys in BJJ who, when rolling, never just taps when caught in a submission. Instead, they make a production out of everything by stopping to complain about something; that you're sick or that you weren't ready or that the other guy is going too hard.
Shee-it, dude, everyone is wrong sometimes. Just act like a sane person by admitting it and move on.
-
How about he takes the internets too seriously for $500, Alex?
Bwahaha. ME? I take the internet too seriously? Compared to BB? WTF?
-
lol
That hurts, Coach.
I thought we were friends...
-
it all varies by state.
but to answer your questions it's roughly 10,000 babies a year are killed in the US after their 20th week.
but you still didn't answer the question. why?
you're the one who says that killing a baby 1 minute old is "crazy shit". all i did was ask you to explain why that's crazy to you.
I'm not aware of any babies being killed, much less 10,000
I wonder why you didn't post some links to support this crazy claim
-
Like capital punishment or war?
LOL. Coach, this article seems like a bunch of hooey.
Liberals saying that killing kids up until the age of 4 should be OK? WTF?
You will seriously believe anything, won't you?
He will...believe me.....unfortunate.....
-
I DO try to be funny -- It's a "concerted" (lol) effort on my part to show that a lot of your opinions are laughable.
As far as trying to "sound smart", I don't know exactly what you mean. Maybe you could try to be entertaining by explaining?
It's probably immature of me but fuck it, I get a kick out of it when a guy your age resorts to insults and name-calling just because it's pointed out that some of your opinions are a little wacky. You might as well just say "uncle" and wave a white flag, lol.
It seems to me that you'll go to funny lengths in an effort to not be proven wrong here on this forum. Besides calling names, another of your go-to moves is when you deliberately put your head in the sand by refusing to listen or read something that supports the argument of someone who disagrees with you. As another poster here astutely put it, you often refuse to process new information when it hurts your argument.
Makes me wonder if you could possibly be a stand-up guy IRL, actually. You remind me of one of those guys in BJJ who, when rolling, never just taps when caught in a submission. Instead, they make a production out of everything by stopping to complain about something; that you're sick or that you weren't ready or that the other guy is going too hard.
Shee-it, dude, everyone is wrong sometimes. Just act like a sane person by admitting it and move on.
I only skimmed this, but Geeze Louise you really are a butt-hurt sissy.
(http://nathantimmel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/internet-serious-business.jpeg)
-
I'm not aware of any babies being killed, much less 10,000
I wonder why you didn't post some links to support this crazy claim
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
1.2% out of roughly 1 million abortion per year. so yeah 10,000.
now that you're aware are you saying that 10,000 babies killed after 20 weeks is crazy?
-
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
1.2% out of roughly 1 million abortion per year. so yeah 10,000.
now that you're aware are you saying that 10,000 babies killed after 20 weeks is crazy?
Keep in mind that pro abortion extremists don't believe a baby is actually a baby until it is born.
Anchor Dares to Ask Planned Parenthood Boss When Life Begins; She Dodges: It 'Isn't Really Relevant'
By Tim Graham | February 28, 2014
Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, America’s largest abortion conglomerate, did an interview Thursday on the new Fusion network with anchorman Jorge Ramos.
The section sparking everyone’s attention came when Ramos – self-respecting enough to offer more than the piffle a Ronan Farrow offers on MSNBC – asked when life begins for Richards. She labored mightily not to answer, since abortion advocates eschew science and believe that women should be able to abort even AFTER a child is born:
JORGE RAMOS: Can I ask you a philosophical question?
CECILE RICHARDS: Sure.
RAMOS So for you, when does life start? When does a human being become a human being?
RICHARDS This is a question, I think, that will be debated through the centuries, and people come down to very different views on that.
RAMOS But for you, what’s the point?
RICHARDS It is not something that I feel like is really part of this conversation. I mean, to me, we work with women – I guess the way I’d really like to I think every woman has to make her own decision. What we do at Planned Parenthood is make sure that women have all their options for health care, and they have the option to have a healthy pregnancy, they have the option to put a child up for adoption if they decide to carry the pregnancy to term, or they have the right to make a decision to terminate a pregnancy.
Ramos tried to pierce through the moral relativism one more time, and Richards repeated "I don’t think it’s really relevant to the conversation," but then she said for her three children, their “life began when I delivered them.”
On Friday, Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser offered a pro-life response:
Cecile Richards’ comments were insensitive and unfeeling to any woman who has ever been pregnant, especially those women who have suffered the pain of miscarriage.
This is an example of the problem of getting so wrapped up in the politics of ‘reproductive choice,’ that the real experience of pregnant women becomes secondary. Richards’ statement misses what most Americans understand about pregnancy, especially women. There are two human beings involved.
If there are disappointments at the ballot box for Planned Parenthood in 2014 it will be an outgrowth of this disconnect with the women they claim to represent.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2014/02/28/anchor-dares-ask-planned-parenthood-boss-when-life-begins-she-avoids-ans#ixzz2vttmxzV8
-
I only skimmed this, but Geeze Louise you really are a butt-hurt sissy.
(http://nathantimmel.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/internet-serious-business.jpeg)
Oh shit, my bad. I get it now.
You're saying that your posts shouldn't be taken seriously because you're a troll.
Nothing wrong with that, I don't think.
Especially if you're just trying to get more traffic on the board here.