Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 05:13:40 AM

Title: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 05:13:40 AM
I went to see it last night. Anybody else see it?

(Bodybuilding related: one of the planets featured had 80% earth gravity, which means that I finally would have been able to bench three wheels)
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: DanielPaul on November 09, 2014, 11:59:36 AM
Great movie, a lot of theoretical physics in it that most will not understand but your avg getbigger will recognize right off the bat.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 12:02:16 PM
Great movie, a lot of theoretical physics in it that most will not understand but your avg getbigger will recognize right off the bat.

My son is 11 and he's very into theoretical physics. He loved it. We've been discussing time-travel, relativistic time, gravity's influence on relativity, etc. It's been a ball.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: el numero uno on November 09, 2014, 12:19:12 PM
Is any of you familiar with the John Titor story that's a good read.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 09, 2014, 12:35:17 PM
My son is 11 and he's very into theoretical physics. He loved it. We've been discussing time-travel, relativistic time, gravity's influence on relativity, etc. It's been a ball.
The physics in it are dumb simple.

Like seriously, that part of it seemed way to basic.

Anyways I loved it can't wait to watch it again.

top 3 faults.

1) Why the fucking watch, she was already doing that note pad thing, would of made more sense that she used them extensively.

2) Why does he live after, should of just sufficated where he was too

3) Dude was in that black whole for like millions of years, again wtf.

Top 3 fuck yeahs

1) Robots were bloody cool, futuristic yet not all shinny and magical.
2) The scope of everything was just awesome.
3) The future not being some magical again was awsome.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: the trainer on November 09, 2014, 12:37:16 PM
I am a strong believer in time travel if you are able to unlock the power of your brain you will be able to jump between dimensions and time travel but in the meantime you can use the power of your brain while you sleep to do it, at an advance level with your brian fully unlocked you can do this while awake.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 12:37:58 PM
The physics in it are dumb simple.

Like seriously, that part of it seemed way to basic.

Anyways I loved it can't wait to watch it again.

top 3 faults.

1) Why the fucking watch, she was already doing that note pad thing, would of made more sense that she used them extensively.

2) Why does he live after, should of just sufficated where he was too

3) Dude was in that black whole for like millions of years, again wtf.

Top 3 fuck yeahs

1) Robots were bloody cool, futuristic yet not all shinny and magical.
2) The scope of everything was just awesome.
3) The future not being some magical again was awsome.

My biggest fault was that that was a huge elaborate setup to give the full gravitational equation to humans. Instead of constructing a wormhole, manipulating time, building a 4D tesseract in a black hole and bending space-time, you could have just sent a letter to Alfred with the equation written out.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: DanielPaul on November 09, 2014, 12:53:00 PM
The physics in it are dumb simple.

Like seriously, that part of it seemed way to basic.

Anyways I loved it can't wait to watch it again.

top 3 faults.

1) Why the fucking watch, she was already doing that note pad thing, would of made more sense that she used them extensively.

2) Why does he live after, should of just sufficated where he was too

3) Dude was in that black whole for like millions of years, again wtf.

Top 3 fuck yeahs

1) Robots were bloody cool, futuristic yet not all shinny and magical.
2) The scope of everything was just awesome.
3) The future not being some magical again was awsome.
no asshole, how many people do you think know that a strong gravitational pull has any relevance on time?  How many people do you think know that there is anything more than 3 dimensions much less a 4th or theoretical 5th?  How many do you think understand why nothing escapes a black hole, why it spins, why it sucks everything in?  Most people can't even tell you the first U.S. president much less the rest of this stuff.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: FermiDirac on November 09, 2014, 12:56:52 PM
Might round up some old classmates and watch it, considering it brings up a lot of topics in physics.

What's your rating of the movie?
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 01:05:40 PM
Might round up some old classmates and watch it, considering it brings up a lot of topics in physics.

What's your rating of the movie?

7/10. Too long and some dumb-ass decisions. But fun science and great effects.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: njanvi on November 09, 2014, 01:11:44 PM
Might want to learn to spell it correctly if we are supposed to take your review seriously
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 01:13:41 PM
Might want to learn to spell it correctly if we are supposed to take your review seriously

Good point.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Hulkotron on November 09, 2014, 01:14:34 PM
I can't figure "Lundgrenisback" out.

Is he a troll ???

What are his objectives ???
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Rudee on November 09, 2014, 01:16:22 PM
Many times during the movie I thought to myself how much I would have enjoyed sticking out my leg and tripping that TARS robot.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: njanvi on November 09, 2014, 01:17:05 PM
Good point.
Was giving you hard time dude, happy to see you were good sport about it. Most getbiggers would start ww3
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 01:18:33 PM
Was giving you hard time dude, happy to see you were good sport about it. Most getbiggers would start ww3

It would be tough to run from that, I legit misspelled the name of the movie, LOL.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: el numero uno on November 09, 2014, 01:20:53 PM
no asshole, how many people do you think know that a strong gravitational pull has any relevance on time?  How many people do you think know that there is anything more than 3 dimensions much less a 4th or theoretical 5th?  How many do you think understand why nothing escapes a black hole, why it spins, why it sucks everything in?  Most people can't even tell you the first U.S. president much less the rest of this stuff.

I'm really confused about string theory saying there are 10-11 dimensions.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: njanvi on November 09, 2014, 01:23:04 PM
It would be tough to run from that, I legit misspelled the name of the movie, LOL.
We'll call it a typo between us  ;D
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: njanvi on November 09, 2014, 01:24:06 PM
It would be tough to run from that, I legit misspelled the name of the movie, LOL.
Havent seeen it yet, most reviews ive seen not in love with the science
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 01:25:06 PM
Havent seeen it yet, most reviews ive seen not in love with the science

Yes, if astrophysics is your thing, it might be annoying.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 09, 2014, 02:14:46 PM
Great movie, a lot of theoretical physics in it that most will not understand but your avg getbigger will recognize right off the bat.
I'm going tonight with the wife and will report on my view later.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Shockwave on November 09, 2014, 02:20:19 PM
I went to see it last night. Anybody else see it?

(Bodybuilding related: one of the planets featured had 80% earth gravity, which means that I finally would have been able to bench three wheels)
bah. Id trade your arm genetics for my ability to push over 3 wheels anyday.

My arms just dont want to go over the 18" mark. Of course, ive been dieting nonstop for the last year, so that could have something to do with it. :D
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 09, 2014, 02:23:07 PM
no asshole, how many people do you think know that a strong gravitational pull has any relevance on time?  How many people do you think know that there is anything more than 3 dimensions much less a 4th or theoretical 5th?  How many do you think understand why nothing escapes a black hole, why it spins, why it sucks everything in? 
That's because no one gives a shit about this kind of stuff.

It's not because a basic level of understanding is hard or complicated.

Children learn this shit all the time, and just as often forget it by the time they reach university.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 09, 2014, 02:24:36 PM
I can't figure "Lundgrenisback" out.

Is he a troll ???

What are his objectives ???
What the hell are you talking about, please explain?
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: el numero uno on November 09, 2014, 02:28:14 PM
I'm going tonight with the wife and will report on my view later.

Please do it. I recall reading you have a PhD in physics.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on November 09, 2014, 02:28:35 PM
The guy here is building a bicep machine on Mars

(http://oi57.tinypic.com/v60yty.jpg)
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on November 09, 2014, 02:57:05 PM
bah. Id trade your arm genetics for my ability to push over 3 wheels anyday.

My arms just dont want to go over the 18" mark. Of course, ive been dieting nonstop for the last year, so that could have something to do with it. :D

Mine hit 18 and just stopped growing. Of course, my shoulders, back and chest have responded well. I just need to up my triceps to match my biceps and maybe a set of 19's would be nice.

A ripped 17 looks so much better than a grandma arm at 18.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 05:26:56 AM
Please do it. I recall reading you have a PhD in physics.

I don't want to give anything away that would ruin the movie, not in the previews.
Suffice to say it's a great film with a lot of depth and very well written and acted.

I was pumped that it included ,actual sound theory in :relativity, gravity, black holes, space travel and even string theory.
I personally prefer the 1990's movie  "Contact" written by Carl Sagan and find it ironic that Mathew M. is the male lead in both great films.

I really enjoy how they integrate the human needs with the physics in BOTH great films.
This movie is awesome and a must see for any thinking person.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 05:33:15 AM
The physics in it are dumb simple.

Like seriously, that part of it seemed way to basic.

Anyways I loved it can't wait to watch it again.

top 3 faults.

1) Why the fucking watch, she was already doing that note pad thing, would of made more sense that she used them extensively.

2) Why does he live after, should of just sufficated where he was too

3) Dude was in that black whole for like millions of years, again wtf.

Top 3 fuck yeahs

1) Robots were bloody cool, futuristic yet not all shinny and magical.
2) The scope of everything was just awesome.
3) The future not being some magical again was awsome.

1. Based on current string theory, the watch could ( in theory) capture a frequency vibration from a slightly overlapping dimension outside of the 3D we live in. The math/equations are way beyond debate here, so suffice to say, it's proper modern physics within some models of string theory.

2 and 3. NOBODY, repeat nobody really knows what happens to matter if it goes past the event horizon of a black hole. All we do know is that the gravity is off the chart and this would cause a warping of space/time. What happens if you enter is anyone's guess ????
Having said that, I tend to agree that one would be stretched and crushed, but who knows?

Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 05:34:38 AM
My biggest fault was that that was a huge elaborate setup to give the full gravitational equation to humans. Instead of constructing a wormhole, manipulating time, building a 4D tesseract in a black hole and bending space-time, you could have just sent a letter to Alfred with the equation written out.

Due to string theory, this may be the only way to send a "message" back in time?
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 05:47:29 AM
The guy here is building a bicep machine on Mars

(http://oi57.tinypic.com/v60yty.jpg)

LOL, awesome shop.
I heard he was orbiting Uranus looking for Klingons ;)
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: The_Punisher on November 10, 2014, 06:10:23 AM
at least this flick is more accurate than this shit movie called "Gravity".....Neil Degrasse has approved of this movie.. :)
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: TheShape. on November 10, 2014, 06:22:15 AM
Great movie. It was pretty long though, it could of been split up.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 07:15:44 AM
Great movie. It was pretty long though, it could of been split up.

Disagree, the length was needed to make it come together and still fill in all the key details.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Marty Champions on November 10, 2014, 07:22:52 AM
Due to string theory, this may be the only way to send a "message" back in time?
time is a spatial thing that is woven like a vortex the past is the small but easily trackable to the broad area ofvortex thepast becomes ever more hidden in the weaves
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 07:25:51 AM
time is a spatial thing that is woven like a vortex the past is the small but easily trackable to the broad area ofvortex thepast becomes ever more hidden in the weaves

I don't want to give away any key plot details of the movie here. BUT the string theory model they used was based on the concept of making a 4th dimension he could actually reside in and comprehend his own reality.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Marty Champions on November 10, 2014, 07:31:37 AM
I don't want to give away any key plot details of the movie here. BUT the string theory model they used was based on the concept of making a 4th dimension he could actually reside in and comprehend his own reality.
youll only reach 4th dimension(past present and future at once) with a knowledge of electricity because a machine will be needed
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2014, 07:37:18 AM
youll only reach 4th dimension(past present and future at once) with a knowledge of electricity because a machine will be needed

Well thank you Niky Tesla ... :D
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: kepler2008 on November 10, 2014, 01:16:05 PM
Great film.
Amazing story.
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 10, 2014, 01:26:45 PM
1. Based on current string theory, the watch could ( in theory) capture a frequency vibration from a slightly overlapping dimension outside of the 3D we live in. The math/equations are way beyond debate here, so suffice to say, it's proper modern physics within some models of string theory.

2 and 3. NOBODY, repeat nobody really knows what happens to matter if it goes past the event horizon of a black hole. All we do know is that the gravity is off the chart and this would cause a warping of space/time. What happens if you enter is anyone's guess ????
Having said that, I tend to agree that one would be stretched and crushed, but who knows?

1) I get that, but emotionally the watch thing just seemed a bit sappy.

The idea that the girl spent part of her childhood recording her ghosts message packets, seemed to be way more fitting with the idea of communicating in 4 dimensions.

2-3 agree no one knows which is fine, but we do not before entering, the time would of taken an a long time due to time dilation.

If in orbit took you from a hour equally 7 years obviously the minutes before entering would of been centuries in real time.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on November 10, 2014, 01:39:26 PM
Don't forget that Jessica Chastain is a smoking hot ginger.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 10, 2014, 01:46:32 PM
Don't forget that Jessica Chastain is a smoking hot ginger.
She's getting old though, I almost threw up when she claimed to be the same age as matthew mcounoughay
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on November 10, 2014, 01:49:59 PM
She's getting old though, I almost threw up when she claimed to be the same age as matthew mcounoughay


and you point is ???
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: 240 is Back on November 10, 2014, 01:53:57 PM
string theory.   if there is a string hanging out of her front door, it may be wise to try out back.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: MikMaq on November 10, 2014, 01:59:54 PM
and you point is ???
too old wouldn't hit without makeup.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: 240 is Back on November 10, 2014, 03:07:26 PM
Neil DeGrasse Tyson's thoughts on the movie:

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/11/10/neil-degrasse-tyson-interstellar-science/
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: da_vinci on November 10, 2014, 03:12:17 PM
What time travel some of you nutcases are talking about?

There's NO time to begin with, it's just "Now", a never ending "Now", a constant change/tranformation, no "past" and no "future".
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: el numero uno on November 10, 2014, 03:22:25 PM
What time travel some of you nutcases are talking about?

There's NO time to begin with, it's just "Now", a never ending "Now", a constant change/tranformation, no "past" and no "future".

Thanks for the scientific back up buddie.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: da_vinci on November 10, 2014, 03:29:07 PM
Thanks for the scientific back up buddie.

No prob. "Time" is just an illusion of our minds.

Hope that helps
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Irongrip400 on February 12, 2017, 03:06:35 PM
Just watched it. I don't even remember it coming out in theaters. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but it made me feel kind of depressed or something after the end. I'll probably watch it again. Any books to read up on in this particular genre? Stephen Hawking or somethin?
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: cephissus on February 12, 2017, 03:24:53 PM
Don't think Stephen Hawking writes fantasy novels but I could be mistaken ???
Title: Re: Intersteller, the movie
Post by: Kwon on February 12, 2017, 03:28:40 PM
Might want to learn to spell it correctly if we are supposed to take your review seriously
Intersteller :D
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: _aj_ on February 12, 2017, 03:53:56 PM
Just watched it. I don't even remember it coming out in theaters. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but it made me feel kind of depressed or something after the end. I'll probably watch it again. Any books to read up on in this particular genre? Stephen Hawking or somethin?

What genre? Sci-fi with time travel or the real physics of time travel?
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Irongrip400 on February 12, 2017, 05:12:15 PM
What genre? Sci-fi with time travel or the real physics of time travel?

dis.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: The Ugly on February 12, 2017, 05:30:48 PM
Just watched it. I don't even remember it coming out in theaters. I thoroughly enjoyed it, but it made me feel kind of depressed or something after the end. I'll probably watch it again. Any books to read up on in this particular genre? Stephen Hawking or somethin?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Interstellar

Story was inspired by Kip Thorne's work; he acted as an adviser on the film. Later wrote this book to help explain the science.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: gothorium on February 12, 2017, 05:50:45 PM
1 matthew mgongay
2 science again promoted over engineering
3 why go anywheere?  EArth can be made paradise with unregualted capitalism
4 thorium clean atomic is 0 emissions and safe, and 100k years of thorium with current finding tek
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: The Ugly on February 12, 2017, 05:55:15 PM
1 matthew mgongay
2 science again promoted over engineering
3 why go anywheere?  EArth can be made paradise with unregualted capitalism
4 thorium clean atomic is 0 emissions and safe, and 100k years of thorium with current finding tek

Gotta science before you can engineer.
Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: Gregzs on May 03, 2022, 06:42:59 PM
Don't forget that Jessica Chastain is a smoking hot ginger.

The 10 best dressed from the Met Gala 2022

Title: Re: Interstellar, the movie
Post by: joswift on May 04, 2022, 03:52:34 AM


this girl three years self trained on piano doesnt read music

this is one of the best versions I have heard.