Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: alexxx on February 19, 2006, 10:23:45 AM

Title: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: alexxx on February 19, 2006, 10:23:45 AM
Here is a direct comparison of Sergio Oliva(1972) and Ronnie Coleman(2001) now tell me which in your opinion is better.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Bluto on February 19, 2006, 10:28:14 AM
ronnie. now move on.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Stavios on February 19, 2006, 10:34:09 AM
what a dick... that is the worst comparaison pics ever.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Rowtogrow on February 19, 2006, 10:50:54 AM
what a dick... that is the worst comparaison pics ever.

Yeah lets get a relaxed Ronnie against a pumped Sergio LOL ::)
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: pumpster on February 19, 2006, 11:25:09 AM
What did you expect from Iron Age pics?  ::)
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: canyoufeeltheforce on February 19, 2006, 11:25:42 AM
Don't you mean PAST vs MORE RECENT PAST.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: alexxx on February 19, 2006, 12:59:14 PM
hmmm if Sergio's where 20 1/5" inches cold... makes you wonder how big Ronnies are...
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: sarcasm on February 19, 2006, 01:00:00 PM
hmmm if Sergio's where 20 1/5" inches cold... makes you wonder how big Ronnies are...
18.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: alexxx on February 19, 2006, 01:20:17 PM
how bout this one... Ronnie outweights Haney by 20pds... I don't see it... mmaybe the extra weight is in his ass?
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Stavios on February 19, 2006, 01:39:11 PM
dont you see that ronnies legs are 2 times the size of haney's. Also haney look smooth compared to coleman
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: knny187 on February 19, 2006, 01:41:06 PM
Ronnie "no neck" coleman
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: bigbalddaddy on February 19, 2006, 01:44:04 PM
how bout this one... Ronnie outweights Haney by 20pds... I don't see it... mmaybe the extra weight is in his ass?

It's in his lips...20lbs of synthol in those mothers!!! ;D
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Hulkster on February 19, 2006, 07:41:34 PM
every time I see that comparison I laugh at the comment that someone made that said that "Ronnie lips look lik an asshole in that shot!" and they are right - pretty funny shot! ;D
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Dnizneer on February 19, 2006, 11:08:26 PM
Isnt that the pics from Flex where they graphically enlarge the past Mr. Olympians to match the weight of Ronnie?
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Hulkster on February 19, 2006, 11:17:31 PM
Isnt that the pics from Flex where they graphically enlarge the past Mr. Olympians to match the weight of Ronnie?

I think so because sergio's arm looks bigger than Ronnie's! :)

Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Karl Kox on February 19, 2006, 11:29:50 PM
what a dick... that is the worst comparaison pics ever.

Agree
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Peaking at 45 !!! on February 20, 2006, 07:10:21 AM
Ronnie is amazing !!!!!!!!! But I would rather have Sergios build or Haney's build----------------it is a more attractive physique. :)
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: rocket on February 20, 2006, 07:18:47 AM
Hah I love the bit where he says direct.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: kiwiol on February 20, 2006, 07:23:48 AM
Lets see - Dorian was bigger than Lee Haney. Dorian was at his biggest @ the 1997 Mr. O, where Nasser was slightly bigger than Doz. Ronnie in 1999 was way bigger than Nasser (though he was 10 - 12 lbs lighter, he was way fuller and his structure made him look bigger). Ronnie in 2003 was about 30 pounds heavier than his 1999 self. So, that pic of Lee Haney vs Ronnie, in which they look similar in size is a load of crap.  ::)
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: Dan-O on February 20, 2006, 07:26:23 AM
Hah I love the bit where he says direct.

LOL, right.

Sergio was 5'9".  Ronnie is 5'11".  So look at this pic again.  It's not "direct" anything except a direct attempt to validate some Ironager's misguided delusion.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=55799.0;attach=67448;image)
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: rufjunk on February 20, 2006, 08:24:21 AM
Past ........
and then HOPEFULLY
the future...
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: RUDE BUOY on February 20, 2006, 08:36:05 AM
MR COLEMAN HAS THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS MASS MONSTER AS WELL AS SHREDDED HARDLEY CAN BE COMPARED TO SOMEONE FROM 20 YEARS AGO! RONNIE LIKE HIM OR NOT HAS OWNED THE SPORT FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS NOW TOTALY IN A LEAGUE OF HIS OWN
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: hillbilly on February 20, 2006, 08:39:37 AM
MR COLEMAN HAS THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS MASS MONSTER AS WELL AS SHREDDED HARDLEY CAN BE COMPARED TO SOMEONE FROM 20 YEARS AGO! RONNIE LIKE HIM OR NOT HAS OWNED THE SPORT FOR THE LAST FEW YEARS NOW TOTALY IN A LEAGUE OF HIS OWN

both worlds? only 2? wat about the 3rd world that of shape ronnies size came at a price he lost alot of his lines and gained a gut.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: RUDE BUOY on February 20, 2006, 09:53:16 AM
true hillbilly i agree but i mean everything he has done to be the best is going to catch up to him he cant keep it up for ever
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: MikMaq on December 11, 2012, 05:19:31 PM
Uber gay.
Title: Re: PAST VS FUTURE
Post by: erics on December 11, 2012, 08:00:42 PM
As pathetic as the bloated bellies and complete lack of presentation ability are, there was a time when Ronnie Coleman looked good.

In saying that, in terms of balance, lines and presentation (aesthetics), Haney kills Ronnie in that photo.

In terms of conditioned bulk, then Ronnie kills Haney.

But since I believe that bodybuilding ought to be about mass highlighting aesthetics and not just mass highlighting mass, then I think Haney wins that photo comparison.