Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Army of One on January 08, 2015, 01:56:07 PM
-
id have no remorse chopping them limb from limb! >:(
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2901880/Raped-tortured-forced-live-wardrobe-FIVE-YEARS.html
-
It will sound very harsh an cynical, but I would probably just shoot them in the head peacefully as the girl is quite ugly. Now if she was hot................
-
Make them sit through Dumber and Dumber To
-
force feed them human shit/diarrhea til they died probably
-
Thats fukn insane put them in a closet >:(
-
brutally sad but at least she's making something of her life and her scuzzy parents got a lengthy, prison sentence. in britain they would only have got a couple of years, five tops. they could've murdered her over here and received less time than they are doing now
-
I don't know why I'm always surprised at how sick people are.... 24 hours wouldn't be enough time to properly torture these sick fucks
-
It will sound very harsh an cynical, but I would probably just shoot them in the head peacefully as the girl is quite ugly. Now if she was hot................
Yes, because "ugly" people dont matter... ::) This is Getbig, but even that statement was way too low.
You should just go shoot yourself, fucktard.
-
Notice how they quoted the girl calling her mom mum...but they are from Texas..not sure this website is accurate..well if this is real they deserve the death penalty..my guess is that she is a gay now by the way she dresses
-
Yes, because "ugly" people dont matter... ::) This is Getbig, but even that statement was way too low.
You should just go shoot yourself, fucktard.
Agreed. These scum to deserve everything they got coming to them.
-
Run then over with a steam roller while it was turning so as to smear their bodies into a bloody stain on the road. Then let a heard of African bull elephants p.iss onto the concrete to wash the stains.
-
(http://www.wallwork.me.uk/floor/brass_pins_large.jpg)
(http://www.nuplacorp.com/product_images/1333660694Claw%20Hammer%20Angled.jpg)
-
Imagine how well they'll be received by their fan club in jail.
Oh...guess the race.
-
I would make them post in Goodrum's forum 24/7.
-
Yes, because "ugly" people dont matter... ::) This is Getbig, but even that statement was way too low.
You should just go shoot yourself, fucktard.
Let's be honest - not many would try to help a fat cow who's being robbed on the street. And many would rush to help a hot girl. That's how life is, sorry.
I said I'd shoot them, but no torture or other animalistic pleasure for me in this case.
-
Let's be honest - not many would try to help a fat cow who's being robbed on the street. And many would rush to help a hot girl. That's how life is, sorry.
I said I'd shoot them, but no torture or other animalistic pleasure for me in this case.
Says who??? ??? Your mentailty is completely fucked you know that?
As for helping people being robbed, not many would do anything in the first place, regardless of whos being robbed. There are plenty of social experiements concerning this.
Your mentality is completely vain, selfish and screwed either way... ::)
-
I would put them through a keto diet with zero carbs for five years
And they'd only get pizzas once a week or even skip the pizzas some weeks!
And so soda, ever
-
Take them to both parties conventions next year and make them listen to all the speeches.
-
personally, i would beat them to death from the feet up. baseball bat, cigarette burns, and some kind of public humiliation would probably be warranted as well. i would prefer a method of death that allowed them to believe they were being watched by their victim and also allow them just enough concentration to be reminded of what they did to her for years while they themselves suffer. children are by nature more innocent the younger they are.
problem is, no amount of punishment can put someone into remission of sociopathy. there is no hope for them so death is simply necessary under all circumstances. they cannot be 'taught the error of their ways' by pain or anything else. they just need to be gone in such a way as to give anyone they hurt as much closure and satisfaction as possible.
-
personally, i would beat them to death from the feet up. baseball bat, cigarette burns, and some kind of public humiliation would probably be warranted as well. i would prefer a method of death that allowed them to believe they were being watched by their victim and also allow them just enough concentration to be reminded of what they did to her for years while they themselves suffer. children are by nature more innocent the younger they are.
problem is, no amount of punishment can put someone into remission of sociopathy. there is no hope for them so death is simply necessary under all circumstances. they cannot be 'taught the error of their ways' by pain or anything else. they just need to be gone in such a way as to give anyone they hurt as much closure and satisfaction as possible.
Maybe lock them in a cupboard for life, feed them through a hole in the door
-
I would throw them both off a cliff. Prison is too good for these monsters.
-
blow torch will be my arm extension..
-
Says who??? ??? Your mentailty is completely fucked you know that?
As for helping people being robbed, not many would do anything in the first place, regardless of whos being robbed. There are plenty of social experiements concerning this.
Your mentality is completely vain, selfish and screwed either way... ::)
We all think that our mentality is the "right one". Funny, isn't it?
-
Let's be honest - not many would try to help a fat cow who's being robbed on the street. And many would rush to help a hot girl. That's how life is, sorry.
I said I'd shoot them, but no torture or other animalistic pleasure for me in this case.
You're absolute human trash.
Likely a high school virgin social reject, possible assburgers or maybe daddy "hugged" you too much.
-
We all think that our mentality is the "right one". Funny, isn't it?
Dude, you are literally stating that "ugly" people are worth jack shit, and that we should care less for them. This means not only that your an incredible vain and inconsiderate person, it also means that you lack a huge amount of real empathy towards other people. As much as I hate to see a beauty getting taken from this world compared to a non-beauty, a life is STILL a life!
-
You're absolute human trash.
Likely a high school virgin social reject, possible assburgers or maybe daddy "hugged" you too much.
I'm actually probably a better human being than these who'd like to torture these two (that's a pure animalistic pleasure, a "revenge". Nothing humanitarian about that if you really think about it.).
-
First this: (http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Prison+justice+ju+jitsu+fighter+raped+and+stabbed+over+20_94de15_5113098.jpg)
then this, but never allow them to die.
(http://i.imgur.com/ElNRgzn.jpg)
-
I'm actually probably a better human being than these who'd like to torture these two (that's a pure animalistic pleasure, a "revenge". Nothing humanitarian about that if you really think about it.).
da_vinci.
i see that you were trying to be getbig funny at first, but you entirely missed the point of GB funny. it is raw, funny, but never at the expense of innocents.
now you are grasping at straws trying not to appear like a fucktard.
best move is to give up, retract your statement, move on. Not try to defend your offensive comment.
this was a 3-8 year old child, locked in a cupboard, raped and tortured and starved. there is no "funny side" to that. even on GB.
pull your head in and admit that your comment was out of line. there is no saving face for you. you made the comment.
-
da_vinci.
i see that you were trying to be getbig funny at first, but you entirely missed the point of GB funny. it is raw, funny, but never at the expense of innocents.
now you are grasping at straws trying not to appear like a fucktard.
best move is to give up, retract your statement, move on. Not try to defend your offensive comment.
this was a 3-8 year old child, locked in a cupboard, raped and tortured and starved. there is no "funny side" to that. even on GB.
pull your head in and admit that your comment was out of line. there is no saving face for you. you made the comment.
The thing is - a revenge, torture, etc... for the "bad guys" is actually getting into their position and behaving like they behaved. Pure animal nature. The question is - who damaged them to become such creatures. My comment was harsh, but life is harsh too, sorry...
-
By the looks of it she won't be fitting into a 4 by 9 foot closet again any time soon.
-
The thing is - a revenge, torture, etc... for the "bad guys" is actually getting into their position and behaving like they behaved. Pure animal nature. The question is - who damaged them to become such creatures. My comment was harsh, but life is harsh too, sorry...
Is forgiveness ever an option for such people?
-
The notion of revenge is actually a pure human notion which doesn't exist for the most part in nature.
Retribution outside of the established regulations and procedures is just savage, nothing to do with being animalistic.
-
Is forgiveness ever an option for such people?
You are a christian, aren't you? So the answer probably should come from you too.
One can go far enough analyzing things to a conclusion that noone is really fully responsible for their actions, someone have damaged them, these were damaged by someone else, etc... We can be animals, or we can be something "else" in cases like that. I have no idea what is better. Probably nothing really matters anyway.
-
The notion of revenge is actually a pure human notion which doesn't exist for the most part in nature.
Retribution outside of the established regulations and procedures is just savage, nothing to do with being animalistic.
The pleasure of getting revenge/watching someone suffer is actually animal mind in action, of a higher animal (human).
-
White folks and fucking with little kids i just don't get it
-
You are a christian, aren't you? So the answer probably should come from you too.
One can go far enough analyzing things to a conclusion that noone is really fully responsible for their actions, someone have damaged them, these were damaged by someone else, etc... We can be animals, or we can be something "else" in cases like that. I have no idea what is better. Probably nothing really matters anyway.
Yes I am a Christian. I'm posing the question so that others may answer and give perspective.
Most don't notice, but I only initiate religious discussion on the religion board. I will sometimes respond to religious discussion initiated by others on other boards (primarily G&O).
-
I will give you an ugly person's perspective - as I am indeed that.
Ugly people are treated less well, no doubt about that. A lot of doors are closed to you that would be wide open if you were more attractive. You can still get in with your character, but there's no doubt that being ugly is living a much more difficult life.
Some of what da_vinci is saying is on point. I'm not sure about the robbery on the street bit - as there are certain conventions that are suspended in an emergency but in basic competitive human life, without question - ugly people begin their interaction with most people, behind - and must display something more redeeming.
People are only compassionate when competition is suspended. Until then, an ugly person is behind by default.
-
If cheney had a son and daughter
-
I'd tie them to chairs over a fire-ant colony, covered in honey... ;)
-
That was tough to read what they did to that young girl,
and Her mother was totally involved, boggles the mind.
As what to do to Them, keep them in separate cells with no toilet, no windows, no heating, no bed,
Bare walls, very coarse sand paper or short tacks on floor and walls,
Bring them out every few days and put them in 'stocks' in public.
Let people throw things, punch, kick, whatever they want other than Kill them.
Let them endure this as long as possible.
A quick death is to good for the likes of these kinds.
-
rape by tbombz raw for 2 weeks. Then fed live to starved dogs.
-
It will sound very harsh an cynical, but I would probably just shoot them in the head peacefully as the girl is quite ugly. Now if she was hot................
Bingo. My thoughts exactly.
-
I will give you an ugly person's perspective - as I am indeed that.
Ugly people are treated less well, no doubt about that. A lot of doors are closed to you that would be wide open if you were more attractive. You can still get in with your character, but there's no doubt that being ugly is living a much more difficult life.
Some of what da_vinci is saying is on point. I'm not sure about the robbery on the street bit - as there are certain conventions that are suspended in an emergency but in basic competitive human life, without question - ugly people begin their interaction with most people, behind - and must display something more redeeming.
People are only compassionate when competition is suspended. Until then, an ugly person is behind by default.
This is due to our biological human nature and the survival of the fittest. Attractive and tall people are more dominant in terms of survival, hence we feel they are more valuable, hence less attractive and short people get the shorter end of the stick...
Im sure Uberman can fill on this, but thats basicly what it comes down to.
-
Bingo. My thoughts exactly.
You dont know how bad you just made yourself look........ If I had any respect for you at all, I would lose it permanently.
-
getbig don't care about white on white crime, it matters only if the torturer were black and the victim a hot white girl.
And she sure rebuilt her life by getting fat, look at those rhino arms
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/08/2482CD9300000578-2901880-image-m-6_1420724935289.jpg)
-
another wonderful human being who needs to meet a creative end..
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/26/mom-on-trial-accused-killing-5-year-old-son-with-salt/?intcmp=latestnews
Mom on trial accused of killing 5-year-old son with salt
Published January 26, 2015
Associated Press
Facebook63 Twitter75 Email Print
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. – A confounding and heartbreaking murder case alleging that a mother purposely poisoned her 5-year-old son with salt and documented his decline on social media began Monday in the New York suburbs.
Lacey Spears, 27, of Scottsville, Kentucky, who presented herself online as a supremely devoted mother, is charged with depraved murder and manslaughter in the death a year ago of Garnett-Paul Spears.
"This mother was intentionally feeding her child salt at toxic levels," prosecutor Doreen Lloyd said at Spears' arraignment.
The boy's sodium levels rose to a dangerous point with no medical explanation, prosecutors said, leading to a swollen brain, seizures and death. They believe his single mother, who was sharing his hospital room at Westchester Medical Center, administered salt through a feeding tube into Garnett's stomach.
All the while, she was keeping followers up to date with 28 online postings in the last 11 days of his life, noting his death with, "Garnett the great journeyed onward today at 10:20 a.m." She had tens of thousands of entries over Garnett's lifetime, many about his doctor and hospital visits.
"My Sweet Angel Is In The Hospital For The 23rd Time," Spears tweeted on Nov. 9, 2009, adding a sad-faced emoticon. "Please Pray He Gets To Come Home Soon."
Jury selection began Monday with a pool of 90 potential jurors on hand at the courthouse. Several told the judge they had seen some of the extensive news coverage of the case.
In rulings delivered last week, Lacey Spears' messages on Facebook, Twitter and MySpace were determined relevant and are likely to be introduced as evidence. Some of the posted photos depict Garnett's declining health, said acting state Supreme Court Justice Robert Neary.
Neary also found that prosecutors can tell jurors about Internet research Spears did on her iPhone into the dangers of sodium in children and the properties of iodized salt.
In addition, the judge said Garnett's hospital records from Alabama, Florida and New York are relevant and "inextricably interwoven into the fabric of this case. They provide a history of the child's medical issues and treatment leading up to his death. They illustrate the defendant's role as custodian and care giver."
Prosecutors believe Spears often lied to doctors about Garnett's health, for example claiming he had celiac disease when he didn't.
Spears' lawyers have not publicly detailed a defense strategy and did not return calls seeking comment. Attorney Stephen Riebling said in July that the defense would focus "on the relevant facts, not fiction."
Spears, originally from Decatur, Alabama, was living in Chestnut Ridge, New York, at the time of Garnett's death. She moved to Kentucky before her arrest in June and has been jailed since then. A man who says he is Garnett's father lives in Alabama.
Other evidence in the case includes bags used to feed Garnett which prosecutors say have "extraordinary" concentrations of sodium. The prosecution says Spears tried to cover up by asking a friend to take a feeding bag, "get rid of it and don't tell anybody."
The trial apparently will not include any reference to Munchausen by proxy, a disorder in which caretakers purposely but secretly harm children and then enjoy the attention and sympathy they receive. Some experts regard it as a mental illness and a defense to such crimes, while others consider it a motive. Several believe Spears' case fits the syndrome.
Spears' lawyers asked the judge to prohibit any mention of Munchausen and prosecutors said they had no plans to bring it up.
The murder charge alleges Garnett was killed "under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life" rather than with intent. It carries the same maximum sentence as intentional murder, however -- 25 years to life. The manslaughter count alleges Spears killed her son "while intending to cause serious physical injury."
-
another wonderful human being who needs to meet a creative end..
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/01/26/mom-on-trial-accused-killing-5-year-old-son-with-salt/?intcmp=latestnews
Mom on trial accused of killing 5-year-old son with salt
Published January 26, 2015
Associated Press
Facebook63 Twitter75 Email Print
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. – A confounding and heartbreaking murder case alleging that a mother purposely poisoned her 5-year-old son with salt and documented his decline on social media began Monday in the New York suburbs.
Lacey Spears, 27, of Scottsville, Kentucky, who presented herself online as a supremely devoted mother, is charged with depraved murder and manslaughter in the death a year ago of Garnett-Paul Spears.
"This mother was intentionally feeding her child salt at toxic levels," prosecutor Doreen Lloyd said at Spears' arraignment.
The boy's sodium levels rose to a dangerous point with no medical explanation, prosecutors said, leading to a swollen brain, seizures and death. They believe his single mother, who was sharing his hospital room at Westchester Medical Center, administered salt through a feeding tube into Garnett's stomach.
All the while, she was keeping followers up to date with 28 online postings in the last 11 days of his life, noting his death with, "Garnett the great journeyed onward today at 10:20 a.m." She had tens of thousands of entries over Garnett's lifetime, many about his doctor and hospital visits.
"My Sweet Angel Is In The Hospital For The 23rd Time," Spears tweeted on Nov. 9, 2009, adding a sad-faced emoticon. "Please Pray He Gets To Come Home Soon."
Jury selection began Monday with a pool of 90 potential jurors on hand at the courthouse. Several told the judge they had seen some of the extensive news coverage of the case.
In rulings delivered last week, Lacey Spears' messages on Facebook, Twitter and MySpace were determined relevant and are likely to be introduced as evidence. Some of the posted photos depict Garnett's declining health, said acting state Supreme Court Justice Robert Neary.
Neary also found that prosecutors can tell jurors about Internet research Spears did on her iPhone into the dangers of sodium in children and the properties of iodized salt.
In addition, the judge said Garnett's hospital records from Alabama, Florida and New York are relevant and "inextricably interwoven into the fabric of this case. They provide a history of the child's medical issues and treatment leading up to his death. They illustrate the defendant's role as custodian and care giver."
Prosecutors believe Spears often lied to doctors about Garnett's health, for example claiming he had celiac disease when he didn't.
Spears' lawyers have not publicly detailed a defense strategy and did not return calls seeking comment. Attorney Stephen Riebling said in July that the defense would focus "on the relevant facts, not fiction."
Spears, originally from Decatur, Alabama, was living in Chestnut Ridge, New York, at the time of Garnett's death. She moved to Kentucky before her arrest in June and has been jailed since then. A man who says he is Garnett's father lives in Alabama.
Other evidence in the case includes bags used to feed Garnett which prosecutors say have "extraordinary" concentrations of sodium. The prosecution says Spears tried to cover up by asking a friend to take a feeding bag, "get rid of it and don't tell anybody."
The trial apparently will not include any reference to Munchausen by proxy, a disorder in which caretakers purposely but secretly harm children and then enjoy the attention and sympathy they receive. Some experts regard it as a mental illness and a defense to such crimes, while others consider it a motive. Several believe Spears' case fits the syndrome.
Spears' lawyers asked the judge to prohibit any mention of Munchausen and prosecutors said they had no plans to bring it up.
The murder charge alleges Garnett was killed "under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life" rather than with intent. It carries the same maximum sentence as intentional murder, however -- 25 years to life. The manslaughter count alleges Spears killed her son "while intending to cause serious physical injury."
now the tax payers can spend $50K a year to jail this pig for the next 30 years. Why do people like this even get to live? What's the point of keeping them on this earth.
-
now the tax payers can spend $50K a year to jail this pig for the next 30 years. Why do people like this even get to live? What's the point of keeping them on this earth.
Human trials.
-
id have no remorse chopping them limb from limb! >:(
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2901880/Raped-tortured-forced-live-wardrobe-FIVE-YEARS.html
Poor girl.
About torturing the animals who did it, i would hang them by their feet with a chain and drag them trought the nastyest offroad trail i know, up and down until there would only be their feet attached to the chains.