Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 02:24:13 AM

Title: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 02:24:13 AM
Two atoms communicating over vast distances? Im guessing a rock or grass clipping could communicate or move in such a unified way if they were seperated by 100 feet would be proof to me
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 03:01:16 AM
Basically all im seeing is that only photons can do this?
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: da_vinci on January 20, 2015, 03:05:46 AM
My cock gets hard when I see a hot female specimen. Pretty much a proof of you ask me.
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 03:28:44 AM
My cock gets hard when I see a hot female specimen. Pretty much a proof of you ask me.
hhaha but no thats no different than any basic action reaction
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: _aj_ on January 20, 2015, 03:32:49 AM
How "non-convoluted" does it need to be? Most proofs of anything with the word "quantum" in the description are not things that you can do in your kitchen.
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Europe on January 20, 2015, 03:39:53 AM
How "non-convoluted" does it need to be? Most proofs of anything with the word "quantum" in the description are not things that you can do in your kitchen.
(http://i.imgur.com/Lt1la1q.jpg)

p.s dark matter/energy??
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 03:41:13 AM
How "non-convoluted" does it need to be? Most proofs of anything with the word "quantum" in the description are not things that you can do in your kitchen.
good question the suspicion is now exponentially increased because im sensing a lacking vector in wich actual proof is replaced by agendas
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 03:44:17 AM
How "non-convoluted" does it need to be? Most proofs of anything with the word "quantum" in the description are not things that you can do in your kitchen.
should be no different than proving how a car works, with the addition of a few extra pages(or even less than) in plain english, right?


gas and oil in car man turns key baterry causes engine running.......
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: _aj_ on January 20, 2015, 06:33:51 AM
Well, in the case of quantum entanglement, we don't really know how it works (kinda like gravity), but we can pretty easily (with varying definitions of "easily") reproduce the entanglement effect in a laboratory. As a matter of fact, it is the basis of the entire field of quantum computing, which I believe that IBM's Watson Labs has an early prototype of a quantum "CPU". Likely, the NSA has something too.

So, Cliffs:
- we don't know how it works
- we see the effect in experiments
- it works well enough that we already have applications of its power in proof-of-concept hardware


BB-related: Look at this perfect fucking bicep!

(http://dq8nlzk56ayth.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ArnoldAnswers_620x4452.jpg)
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: tommywishbone on January 20, 2015, 06:34:58 AM
My cock gets hard when I see a hot female specimen. Pretty much a proof of you ask me.

It's hard to argue with such science.
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 07:09:11 AM
Well, in the case of quantum entanglement, we don't really know how it works (kinda like gravity), but we can pretty easily (with varying definitions of "easily") reproduce the entanglement effect in a laboratory. As a matter of fact, it is the basis of the entire field of quantum computing, which I believe that IBM's Watson Labs has an early prototype of a quantum "CPU". Likely, the NSA has something too.

So, Cliffs:
- we don't know how it works
- we see the effect in experiments
- it works well enough that we already have applications of its power in proof-of-concept hardware


BB-related: Look at this perfect fucking bicep!

(http://dq8nlzk56ayth.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ArnoldAnswers_620x4452.jpg)
are you sure when i look for proofs i get the run over by truck
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: el numero uno on January 20, 2015, 07:14:19 AM
Sounds like spooky action at a distance to me.
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Marty Champions on January 20, 2015, 07:16:40 AM
Sounds like spooky action at a distance to me.
lots of non proof non explanation in quatam land
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Howard on January 20, 2015, 07:20:36 AM
Two atoms communicating over vast distances? Im guessing a rock or grass clipping could communicate or move in such a unified way if they were seperated by 100 feet would be proof to me

This is how Goodrum and Basille can send "hate thoughts" to each other from opposite sides of the globe. :)
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Teutonic Knight on January 20, 2015, 11:24:12 PM
Two atoms communicating over vast distances? Im guessing a rock or grass clipping could communicate or move in such a unified way if they were seperated by 100 feet would be proof to me

Visit Western Aussie, Uranium ore all over  :D

Maralinga is good place for freebees  ;)
Title: Re: is there any non-covoluted proof of quantam entanglement????
Post by: Rami on January 21, 2015, 12:18:32 AM
This opens up the possibility of a universe-wide lag free Internet. Meaning  everybody can be welcomed to getbig in the future and discuss bodybuilding related topics, and more! EVERYONE.