Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:02:51 PM

Title: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:02:51 PM
Tesla measured the cosmic rays from Antarus to be 50 times greater than the speed of light disproving einstiens relativity wich says nothing can exceed the speed of light!

pretty fucking awesome yet we still have light speed as a constant , prepetuated by fools like neil gegrasse tyson and stephen hawkings
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: che on February 11, 2015, 05:04:56 PM
Who gives a fuck  ???
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: SF1900 on February 11, 2015, 05:05:37 PM
Tesla measured the cosmic rays from Antarus to be 50 times greater than the speed of light disproving einstiens relativity wich says nothing can exceed the speed of light!

pretty fucking awesome yet we still have light speed as a constant , prepetuated by fools like neil gegrasse tyson and stephen hawkings

Email tesla and NDT asking them why they still believe in false theories.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:06:09 PM
Who gives a fuck  ???
fuck u pussy
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: The_Punisher on February 11, 2015, 05:06:24 PM
Tesla measured the cosmic rays from Antarus to be 50 times greater than the speed of light disproving einstiens relativity wich says nothing can exceed the speed of light!

pretty fucking awesome yet we still have light speed as a constant , prepetuated by fools like neil gegrasse tyson and stephen hawkings


faster than the speed of light?....that would be 9.3 million miles/sec......WOW....there will be endless debate on this
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: che on February 11, 2015, 05:09:31 PM
fuck u pussy
Bring it bitch .
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:09:56 PM

faster than the speed of light?....that would be 9.3 million miles/sec......WOW....there will be endless debate on this
yep google it pretty fucking crazy the world hated master tesla

Everybody wanna use electricity but nobody wana read tesla
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:15:57 PM
This is the whole "spooky action at a distance" that einstien got so hard about but couldnt figure out why because he refused to back down from his speed of light constant
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: polychronopolous on February 11, 2015, 05:18:09 PM
(http://comps.canstockphoto.com/can-stock-photo_csp10390756.jpg)

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/6732/6732,1200519794,1/stock-photo-handsome-african-american-electrician-working-on-a-breaker-panel-model-is-an-actual-electrician-8610925.jpg)
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Knooger on February 11, 2015, 05:22:09 PM
What is the speed of gravity? If the Sun suddenly disappeared how long would it take for Earth to fly off away from its normal orbit?
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:24:44 PM
I need some aristocrat vodka for reading energy tonite to help teach others!
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Knooger on February 11, 2015, 05:32:14 PM
I think you should forget about this electricity stuff. I believe you should focus on gravity. If you could find a way to bend gravity the way a prism bends light you would really change the world. Imagine how much less energy it would take to fly an airplane if you could make it weigh only a couple hundred pounds. You need to invent a gravity shield.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 05:50:48 PM
I think you should forget about this electricity stuff. I believe you should focus on gravity. If you could find a way to bend gravity the way a prism bends light you would really change the world. Imagine how much less energy it would take to fly an airplane if you could make it weigh only a couple hundred pounds. You need to invent a gravity shield.
think of gravity as a constant downward wind, wich it basically is makieng that constant pressure
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 06:09:14 PM
I think you should forget about this electricity stuff. I believe you should focus on gravity. If you could find a way to bend gravity the way a prism bends light you would really change the world. Imagine how much less energy it would take to fly an airplane if you could make it weigh only a couple hundred pounds. You need to invent a gravity shield.
at the very least, if we are attemting to meddle with gavity we will probably need a very cold temp since alot of anamolies occur the colder you make something
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Knooger on February 11, 2015, 06:13:57 PM
at the very least, if we are attemting to meddle with gavity we will probably need a very cold temp since alot of anamolies occur the colder you make something

I read somewhere that the forces that hold atoms together are closely related to gravity, so when you invent a gravity shield make sure it is not also a disintegration machine.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: da_vinci on February 11, 2015, 06:19:31 PM
I read somewhere that the forces that hold atoms together are closely related to gravity, so when you invent a gravity shield make sure it is not also a disintegration machine.

I would prefer an invisibility cloak so I could go to my gym female showers unnoticed (have seen enough cocks already if anyone wondering why I'd like to do that).
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on February 11, 2015, 06:22:29 PM
I aLways questioned the speed of light being the fastest. I'm not smart enough to prove it though.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 06:24:08 PM
I read somewhere that the forces that hold atoms together are closely related to gravity, so when you invent a gravity shield make sure it is not also a disintegration machine.
tesla said the planets and stars came to existance by pockets of "ether" somehow becoming less dense

Thenothingness is the ether  but its apparently infinitly dense with all the energy
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 06:25:58 PM
I aLways questioned the speed of light being the fastest. I'm not smart enough to prove it though.
reread thread title its already been done
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on February 11, 2015, 06:33:32 PM
What is the speed of gravity? If the Sun suddenly disappeared how long would it take for Earth to fly off away from its normal orbit?
We'd turn into an iceball immediately. Earth would then go off course being attracted to the next largest star and probably crash into other stars on the way there.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: HTexan on February 11, 2015, 06:38:41 PM
tesla was a genius but also a crazy lying asshat. So basically like Stephen hawking.  ;D :D
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 11, 2015, 06:39:40 PM
What is the speed of gravity? If the Sun suddenly disappeared how long would it take for Earth to fly off away from its normal orbit?
there is a formula for the acceleration of gravity
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: TheShape. on February 11, 2015, 06:58:44 PM
Do you believe Tesla created a time machine?
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: SquatsRule on February 11, 2015, 07:14:38 PM
tesla said the planets and stars came to existance by pockets of "ether" somehow becoming less dense

Thenothingness is the ether  but its apparently infinitly dense with all the energy

Tesla knew the dark elves from Thor? Freaky shit bro.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Knooger on February 11, 2015, 07:50:09 PM
there is a formula for the acceleration of gravity

9.8 meters per second squared, that's not what I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is if the Sun suddenly was gone how long would it take for the lack of gravity to throw our planet out of its orbit? Would it be instant, would it take the speed of light? How long until we would feel the absence of the Sun's gravity?
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: DanielPaul on February 11, 2015, 08:13:57 PM
(http://comps.canstockphoto.com/can-stock-photo_csp10390756.jpg)

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/6732/6732,1200519794,1/stock-photo-handsome-african-american-electrician-working-on-a-breaker-panel-model-is-an-actual-electrician-8610925.jpg)
would this be considered an oxymoron?
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Marty Champions on February 12, 2015, 01:55:00 PM
This thread should be reported to cnn for disproving one of the main pillars of relativity
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: SquatsRule on February 12, 2015, 02:25:30 PM
(http://comps.canstockphoto.com/can-stock-photo_csp10390756.jpg)

(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/6732/6732,1200519794,1/stock-photo-handsome-african-american-electrician-working-on-a-breaker-panel-model-is-an-actual-electrician-8610925.jpg)

I had no idea Snoop Dogg was an electrician.
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: da_vinci on February 12, 2015, 03:34:05 PM
http://time.com/3707137/tesla-house-battery/
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Nails on February 12, 2015, 03:55:56 PM
(http://awesomegifs.com/wp-content/uploads/neil-degrasse-tyson-does-a-happy-dance.gif)
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: Teutonic Knight on February 13, 2015, 01:23:02 AM
I need some aristocrat vodka for reading energy tonite to help teach others!

Any news about recommended Tesla films  ;)
Vodka + those movies = ac/dc
Title: Re: new york times 7/11/35 tesla disproves relativity
Post by: polychronopolous on February 13, 2015, 08:28:33 AM
I had no idea Snoop Dogg was an electrician.

TESLA BLOWS THROUGH CASH; STOCK PLUMMETS ON LOSS

(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2014/12/Tesla-tow-Pollak-640x480.jpg)

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock price plunged by -7.4% in premarket trading on Thursday after the company announced that deliveries had fallen short, problems had affected production, and a strong dollar had hurt earnings. Those earnings turned out to be a real stinker, with Tesla posting a loss of -$0.13 a share, after steering analysts to expect a profit.

With the company hemorrhaging cash, CEO Elon Musk bizarrely predicted Tesla’s market value in ten years would equal Apple’s (NASDAQ:AAPL) $700 billion market cap.

You have to give credit to Musk for extreme hutzpah. Despite SEC investor protection requirements that companies listed on stock exchanges follow what are called Generally Accepted Accounting Policies (GAAP) in reporting financial results, Tesla reports on a “non-GAAP basis” and gets away with it.

This bit of accounting magic helped Tesla turn a GAAP loss of -$74.7 million, or -$.60 per share in the third quarter into a non-GAAP profit of +$3.2 million, or +$.02 a share. But not even a magician could have prepared the stock analysts for a 2014 fourth quarter non-GAAP loss of -$42.3 million, or -$0.13 a share. The GAAP–compliant loss was stunning: -$107.6 million, or -$0.86 per share.

Musk said the on the company’s earnings conference call that he believed TSLA shares would rise over the next ten years from around $27 billion today to about the same $700 billion as Apple stock. His forecast “only presumes” consistent annual sales growth of 50% with 10% profit margins and stock market multiple of 20 times profits. “Our market cap would be basically the same as Apple’s is today,” Musk concluded. “Obviously, getting there will require some significant CapEx [cash injections]. But hopefully we can do this without any significant dilution to the company.” He did caution that on numbers that could fail to materialize, “but I bet that they do occur, personally.”

Of course there have only been a few small companies that could ever boast that type of record. Apple is not one of them, because the company got into such deep financial trouble twice and almost filed for bankruptcy. Essentially, Musk is claiming that he is much smarter and much more creative than the phenomenal Steve Jobs.

After the pep talk by Musk, the stock rallied and by the end of the day, the Tesla stock closed at $202.88, down -$9.92 or -4.66%. Musk did not mention that the stock was as high as $291.42 in early September, before oil prices were cut in half and green competition began rising from such pesky upstarts as Mercedes, Audi and BMW. With its i8, BMW appears to have the “emotive appeal” of the original Tesla Roadster.

Top-drawer institutional broker JP Morgan was so impressed with the earnings call they immediately down-graded the stock to an “under-weight” position. That is polite Wall-Street-speak for the game is over and dump that loser!

JP Morgan said the last six months prove the company does not have the ability to scale sales and production profitably. They have no faith that Tesla can meet its own prediction of delivering 55,000 vehicles in 2015 versus 32,000 in 2014. They are all but rolling on the ground over Tesla’s claim to ship 500,000 in 2020 and “millions” in 2025.

Some of the risks for the Tesla horror show highlighted by JP Morgan include that operating expenses are higher; 4Q EPS was a loss rather than profit; 4Q free cash flow was a bigger outflow; Tesla guided 1Q production -33% lower; 1Q operating expense guided much higher; 1Q gross margin guided is softer than JPM expected; full year 2015 delivery guided down; 2015 operating expense guided up; and lower 2015 earnings.

But the real back-breaker for shareholders is that 80% of Tesla quarterly earnings reports since 2011 showed negative cash flow. JP Morgan seems to wonder whether Tesla will eventually run out of cash. Musk can still raise money, but diluting shareholders at lower and lower prices will cause investor anger. If the stock continues to “dumpster dive,” as they say on Wall Street, Tesla could eventually be cut off from new cash.