Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Neymar Barca on February 26, 2015, 09:54:58 AM

Title: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Neymar Barca on February 26, 2015, 09:54:58 AM
.............

Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 09:59:38 AM
Man what years of hard work and natural genetics can do. Amazing
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: MORTALCOIL on February 26, 2015, 10:01:56 AM
Been working on his lying skills for more than thirty years. No wonder he feels natural about it.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 10:02:24 AM
Been working on his lying skills for more than thirty years. No wonder he feels natural about it.

Everything comes "natural" to mike
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: affeman on February 26, 2015, 10:06:50 AM
Has it ever crossed your mind that there might be people with better genetics than yours on planet earth?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 10:11:17 AM
Has it ever crossed your mind that there might be people with better genetics than yours on planet earth?

Of course there are. Do I think that there are genetics that allow people to walk around at 250 plus pounds at 5% body fat year round? no. Let's use common sense. Why is it that nothing has changed over the past 50 years except the drugs and the availability of them but now all of no where we have people that are bigger and in better condition than guys at the olympia in the 70 and early 80 but they're natural? I mean really?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: affeman on February 26, 2015, 10:13:38 AM
Of course there are. Do I think that there are genetics that allow people to walk around at 250 plus pounds at 5% body fat year round no. Let's use common sense. Why is it that nothing has changed over the past 50 years except the drugs and the availability of them but now all of no where we have people that are bigger and in better condition thrn guys at the olyimpa in the 70 and early 80 but they're natural? I mean really

How come cars drive faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Why are computers faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Drugs?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 10:16:09 AM
How come cars drive faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Why are computers faster and better than 30 or 40 years ago? Drugs?

Increase in technology.  Weights havnt changed they still are weights, food isn't changed.. But there have been leaps in the drug game since the 70's

Are you telling me people's genetics have gotten better in 30 years?

Lifting styles and dieting has advanced.  Has it advanced so much that now a natty guy can be bigger and leaner then Arnold who had amazing genetics and took drugs?

Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Rudee on February 26, 2015, 10:18:04 AM
All sweet potato and squirrel egg.   And exactly 10 almonds a day.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: affeman on February 26, 2015, 10:21:13 AM
Increase in technology.  Weights havnt changed they still are weights, food isn't changed.. But there have been leaps in the drug game since the 70's

Are you telling me people's genetics have gotten better in 30 years?

Lifting styles and dieting has advanced.  Has it advanced so much that now a natty guy can be bigger and leaner then Arnold who had amazing genetics and took drugs?

Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 10:22:51 AM
Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.

So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

What is he 6' 3" 245ish in crazy condition
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: affeman on February 26, 2015, 10:27:25 AM
So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

Idk and I don't give a f*ck, I know neither of em. I'm just not that insecure to claim that I'm the ultimate peak of human genetic evolution and everyone who looks better than me has to be a juicer, Period. I accept the fact that there might be guys out there who got better genetics than me regarding the single, quite unimportant factor of building muscle, maybe I got em on other facotrs. :)
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Competitor 9 on February 26, 2015, 10:29:08 AM
Idk and I don't give a f*ck, I know neither of em. I'm just not that insecure to claim that I'm the ultimate peak of human genetic evolution and everyone who looks better than me has to be a juicer, Period. I accept the fact that there might be guys out there who got better genetics than me regarding the single, quite unimportant factor of building muscle, maybe I got em on other facotrs. :)

Haha I'm not saying he dosnt have great genetics. He does no question!
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Waller on February 26, 2015, 10:33:49 AM
That's affeman outed then?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Dave D on February 26, 2015, 11:09:07 AM
Looks like he's been wearing toupees since his teens.

#teamwigs4life

Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: ritch on February 26, 2015, 01:23:59 PM
so what then? If he uses, he's been on for all these years? Hmm, not sure about this. He is naturally strong, that translates into great gains if you train properly and he does.

Not sayin' he's lifetime natural but probably not the abuser guys here make him out to be. His body would be much more aged by now had he abused like a maniac over decades.

Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: thebrink on February 26, 2015, 01:34:28 PM
So your saying that Arnold could be better today as a natty in better condition then he was in the 70s? Mike is bigger and leaner then Arnold all natty!

What is he 6' 3" 245ish in crazy condition

Arnolds chest and arms way bigger than Ohearns
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Julio Ceasar on February 26, 2015, 01:48:20 PM
Arnold was severely overtrained and his diet was complete BS by todays scientific standards. I'm sure Arnold would look a whole lot different with todays knowledge and equipment, yes.

Please share some knowledge, it would be nice to add 10 pound pure muscle and got under 10% bodyfat...im just curious if I have missed something in my 22 years of natural lifting career...

Equipment...thats interesting!!!
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Julio Ceasar on February 26, 2015, 01:52:59 PM
Arnolds chest and arms way bigger than Ohearns

U dont know if ohearn max his body or just cruising around on low doses! U cant compare these to men! Arnold probably maxed everything and was willing to do anything to win the contest!

Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: ramana on February 26, 2015, 01:54:18 PM
Man what years of hard work and natural genetics can do. Amazing
i guess so because you have been juicing your ballz off and stuffing yourself like a pig for years and still look like fucking shit
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: kepler2008 on February 26, 2015, 02:18:07 PM
Mother Nature don't allow to transform a body like that :

from this :




to this :

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/t31.0-8/s960x960/10974438_632265500208541_3425011814223111925_o.jpg)


Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: thebrink on February 26, 2015, 03:16:08 PM
U dont know if ohearn max his body or just cruising around on low doses! U cant compare these to men! Arnold probably maxed everything and was willing to do anything to win the contest!



the fuck are you on about now??
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: da_vinci on February 26, 2015, 04:11:55 PM
so what then? If he uses, he's been on for all these years? Hmm, not sure about this. He is naturally strong, that translates into great gains if you train properly and he does.

Not sayin' he's lifetime natural but probably not the abuser guys here make him out to be. His body would be much more aged by now had he abused like a maniac over decades.



I think he's a very smart abuser. He's stong as fuck in every exercise and he's nearing 50, there are very very few people who can achieve that. That dude may be gay or whatever, but he's certainly no dummie when it comes to his craft. Genetics of gods are there too, obviously.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: da_vinci on February 26, 2015, 04:15:03 PM
Mother Nature don't allow to transform a body like that :

from this :





Holly hell, what a moonface he has in this vid, lmfao. The face transformation alone is crazy.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Pet shop boys on February 26, 2015, 07:02:11 PM
This guy has been on the juice since Samir Banout was Mr.O !



Woosshhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Bluez on February 26, 2015, 07:06:32 PM
.............



Face Book was around in 1986?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 26, 2015, 07:15:25 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Master Blaster on February 26, 2015, 09:52:45 PM
This guy has been on the juice since Samir Banout was Mr.O !



Woosshhhhhhhh

Quote of the day
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on February 26, 2015, 09:54:52 PM
This guy took his first shot of Test the same night the final episode of M.A.S.H aired...
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: Akeelsolid on February 26, 2015, 10:11:55 PM
I think he's a very smart abuser. He's stong as fuck in every exercise and he's nearing 50, there are very very few people who can achieve that. That dude may be gay or whatever, but he's certainly no dummie when it comes to his craft. Genetics of gods are there too, obviously.

Mike O'hearn was not naturally strong. I know many people who went to high school with him at Junita High in Kirkland WA. He was (in yearbook pic) a skinny kid that couldn't get on the football team. O'hearn, would (at his sophomore year, start training at the now defunct Powerhouse gym in Kirkland, (where Vic Richards trained as well) (in the 80's) the biggest strongest guys trained there and it was only a matter of time he was taken under their wings, as the story goes he came back after summer break looking like he gained 20lbs of muscle.

Hard-driven dude no doubt, always talked about how he wanted to be a star, I'm  sure as you said Davinci, He no doubt is very smart with his use, combined with his extreme work-ethic, he became pretty successful.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: da_vinci on February 27, 2015, 04:03:46 AM
Akeel>No wonder, he has small joints and is extremly strong at the same, that is some serious work, drugs or no drugs, you don't get THAT strong without livin and breathin' it for many many years, esp. for a former skinny kid. What can I say, well done.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: whitewidow on February 27, 2015, 04:26:17 AM
This guy isn't fooling anybody who knows the game. all drugs.
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: forillagorilla on February 27, 2015, 04:47:05 AM
Of course there are. Do I think that there are genetics that allow people to walk around at 250 plus pounds at 5% body fat year round? no. Let's use common sense. Why is it that nothing has changed over the past 50 years except the drugs and the availability of them but now all of no where we have people that are bigger and in better condition than guys at the olympia in the 70 and early 80 but they're natural? I mean really?

Is it all drugs that has made the average height in the NBA rise??  Is it drugs that has made the average weight AND height of the NFL lineman increase so dramatically....   I won't get into an argument over it because it's ome thing we all laugh at but the fact is that if you ever spend time around elite athletes you realize that there are HUGE differences in genetics..  More people than ever have the opportunity to compete in all sports both due to population increase over the last 30 years and just the "shrinking" of the world due to the Internet..

I can assure you that there are genetic freaks that are naturally Huge - AND then there are genetic freaks that have INSANE response to AAS and training...  Go to ProMuscle and read what the vets have to say.. Anyone that has been in the upper level of the sport knows that it's very obvious the first time you take aas you will know if you have "it" and no amount of work can match that.. If you don't have "it" you cannot just take tons more -doesn't work that way
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: mazfit on February 27, 2015, 04:55:33 AM
^^^ shut the fuk up

its all drugs and nothing but drugs
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: affeman on February 27, 2015, 04:56:03 AM
As you notice, he got pretty weak delts. He doesn't have that round cannonball look to his delts most juicers have. Delts and traps usually grow the most on juice.

A lotta juicers, while looking quite average, you can spot immedeately with one look at their delts. No natural ever has that sweeping, round look to their delts. O'Hearn doesn't have it.

(http://www.twilightfansitalia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/kell6.jpg)
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: falco on February 27, 2015, 05:24:52 AM
i guess so because you have been juicing your ballz off and stuffing yourself like a pig for years and still look like fucking shit

Rameira keeping it real. ::)
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: da_vinci on February 27, 2015, 05:30:43 AM
affeman> He's approaching 50, has a body of a top athlete of 30 and is stronger than most pros by a margin. You really have to wonder?
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: SuperTed on February 27, 2015, 07:15:07 AM
LOL @ anyone who believes Mike is natural. :D

One thing I like about getbig is there aren't too many delusional retards here that pollute other BB forums....but reading through some of the comments here, maybe I'm wrong. :-\
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: ramana on February 27, 2015, 11:06:08 AM
As you notice, he got pretty weak delts. He doesn't have that round cannonball look to his delts most juicers have. Delts and traps usually grow the most on juice.

A lotta juicers, while looking quite average, you can spot immedeately with one look at their delts. No natural ever has that sweeping, round look to their delts. O'Hearn doesn't have it.

(http://www.twilightfansitalia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/kell6.jpg)
this is total bullshit, many juicers cant get round delts no matter what they do
Title: Re: Mike O`Hearn in 1986
Post by: _bruce_ on February 27, 2015, 01:29:11 PM
Mike has been getting nano bot injection via bend over recti-mechanics since 1988. He made his first million via flooding wallstreet with high performance  bottom up investments.
Dude's a genius.