Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: blacken700 on February 27, 2015, 09:04:58 AM
-
:D :D :D :D :D
Fox News host, whose stories of past reporting exploits are under renewed scrutiny, claimed ‘we were attacked by protesters’ when covering the 1992 riots
Former colleagues of Bill O’Reilly, the Fox News host whose tales of past reporting exploits are facing renewed scrutiny, have disputed his account of surviving a bombardment of bricks and rocks while covering the 1992 riots in Los Angeles.
Six people who covered the riots with O’Reilly in California for Inside Edition told the Guardian they did not recall an incident in which, as O’Reilly has claimed, “concrete was raining down on us” and “we were attacked by protesters”.
Several members of the team suggested that O’Reilly may instead be overstating a fracas involving one disgruntled Los Angeles resident, who smashed one of their cameras with a piece of rubble.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/another-shoe-drops-bill-oreillys-ex-colleagues-call-his-l-a-riot-stories-completely-
-
Well at this point, O'Lielly's "everything I've got" that he is going to come after people with is getting quite diluted by the number of people he's going to "get".
-
I don't watch O'Reilly but I just might for his reaction. You have to admit thIs is a concerted effort to single out a ring winger after Williams fall from grace. It's not being done in the spirit of journalistic inquiry but out of personal malice.
-
This is so stupid......this is another he said/she said perception thing. The one issue is the suicide story. He was either there or he wasnt. Thats a straight up lie on one side or the other. Fox won't back him if he lied on that.
-
he brought it upon himself,scrutinizing Williams knowing all along you yourself did the same thing
-
he brought it upon himself,scrutinizing Williams knowing all along you yourself did the same thing
I don't think it is an effort to single him out and get him, I think it is just what happens when karma pays a visit to a hypocrite.
-
Gimme a break...they looked around and found a guy to go after. Corn is a piece of shit leftwing douche......they knew what they were doing.
-
he brought it upon himself,scrutinizing Williams knowing all along you yourself did the same thing
I acknowledge that point but many others did as well and more severely. As far as I can tell he's the only one being singled out. It's gotten to the point where the journalists attacking O'Reilly have spent more time and effort on him than they did on Williams-if they did at all. It's petty partisanship.
-
This is so stupid......this is another he said/she said perception thing. The one issue is the suicide story. He was either there or he wasnt. Thats a straight up lie on one side or the other. Fox won't back him if he lied on that.
“They were throwing bricks and stones at us,” O’Reilly told an online interviewer in 2006. “Concrete was raining down on us. The cops saved our butts that time.” Earlier this week, he told the broadcaster Hugh Hewitt: “We were attacked, we were attacked by protesters, where bricks were thrown at us.”
so this is the same as one disgruntled Los Angeles resident, who smashed one of their cameras with a piece of rubble. yeah ooookkk :D :D :D
-
I acknowledge that point but many others did as well and more severely. As far as I can tell he's the only one being singled out. It's gotten to the point where the journalists attacking O'Reilly have spent more time and effort on him than they did on Williams-if they did at all. It's petty partisanship.
I'm sure they're looking at others,maybe o'reilly is just easy pickings right now
-
I'm sure they're looking at others,maybe o'reilly is just easy pickings right now
That's probably true. The bigger the mouth the more likely something stupid falls out
-
He certainly lied on the suicide thing, he did it in print.
He certainly lied 2x about the nun shooting things.
He sure made it blurry on his war coverage too.
And FOX will certainly keep him on board.
-
Going back 23 years while that fagget you left wing pos shill for lied 2 days ago? Nice
-
:D :D :D :D :D
Fox News host, whose stories of past reporting exploits are under renewed scrutiny, claimed ‘we were attacked by protesters’ when covering the 1992 riots
Former colleagues of Bill O’Reilly, the Fox News host whose tales of past reporting exploits are facing renewed scrutiny, have disputed his account of surviving a bombardment of bricks and rocks while covering the 1992 riots in Los Angeles.
Six people who covered the riots with O’Reilly in California for Inside Edition told the Guardian they did not recall an incident in which, as O’Reilly has claimed, “concrete was raining down on us” and “we were attacked by protesters”.
Several members of the team suggested that O’Reilly may instead be overstating a fracas involving one disgruntled Los Angeles resident, who smashed one of their cameras with a piece of rubble.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/another-shoe-drops-bill-oreillys-ex-colleagues-call-his-l-a-riot-stories-completely-
LOL. ::)
-
:D :D :D :D :D
Fox News host, whose stories of past reporting exploits are under renewed scrutiny, claimed ‘we were attacked by protesters’ when covering the 1992 riots
Former colleagues of Bill O’Reilly, the Fox News host whose tales of past reporting exploits are facing renewed scrutiny, have disputed his account of surviving a bombardment of bricks and rocks while covering the 1992 riots in Los Angeles.
Six people who covered the riots with O’Reilly in California for Inside Edition told the Guardian they did not recall an incident in which, as O’Reilly has claimed, “concrete was raining down on us” and “we were attacked by protesters”.
Several members of the team suggested that O’Reilly may instead be overstating a fracas involving one disgruntled Los Angeles resident, who smashed one of their cameras with a piece of rubble.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/02/another-shoe-drops-bill-oreillys-ex-colleagues-call-his-l-a-riot-stories-completely-
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Liberal_news_outlets
-
Going back 23 years while that fagget you left wing pos shill for lied 2 days ago? Nice
many of Oreilly's lies were made in the 2000s. Some in 2008 and in later books.
Just because the event happened decades ago doesn't excuse oreilly from lying about it recently.
-
many of Oreilly's lies were made in the 2000s. Some in 2008 and in later books.
Just because the event happened decades ago doesn't excuse oreilly from lying about it recently.
2008 huh? All while you left wintg Obama voters STILL cover for Obama's lies every day?
Nice bro - a nd you wonder why . . . . . . . .
-
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Liberal_news_outlets
can you post a link that proves this story is not true, come on your not that dumb :o
-
And in a nation of 300 Million BOR matters how?
-
If we are talking about hypocrisy why isn't David Corn going after the easy target in his own organization, Al Sharpton? Oh well, let them all fight until none of them are left.
-
And in a nation of 300 Million BOR matters how?
mmmm really who started this thread when the nation was at 300 million Brian Williams busted lying about being shot down by RPG
-
And in a nation of 300 Million BOR matters how?
He's the #1 popular show in the #1 cable news channel.
-
can you post a link that proves this story is not true, come on your not that dumb :o
That's an asinine question. The story just came out. No one has had time to even respond to it. But the history of the left is based predominantly on lies. Their credibility is shot. Which is why you never trust a liberal.
-
That's an asinine question. The story just came out. No one has had time to even respond to it. But the history of the left is based predominantly on lies. Their credibility is shot.
so those 6 people are lying and orreily the known liar is telling the truth,is that what your saying :D
-
That's an asinine question. The story just came out. No one has had time to even respond to it. But the history of the left is based predominantly on lies. Their credibility is shot. Which is why you never trust a liberal.
as I see it neither the left or right has a monopoly on telling the truth ;)
-
as I see it neither the left or right has a monopoly on telling the truth ;)
Amen brother
-
as I see it neither the left or right has a monopoly on telling the truth ;)
The left have made it an art form. Borderline pathological. They will backstab you in a heartbeat.
-
The left have made it an art form. Borderline pathological. They will backstab you in a heartbeat.
only in your world,i'm going to guess you get most of your news from fox :o
-
only in your world,i'm going to guess you get most of your news from fox :o
All sources. You just need to decipher bullshit from reality and history.
-
so those 6 people are lying and orreily the known liar is telling the truth,is that what your saying :D
these kinds of stories aren't something to debate. There are contrasting statements by OReilly himself. It's not even about a co-worker hating on him. It's him saying twice "I watched nuns shot in head" then saying elsewhere "I heard about the nun shootings and decided to..." His own contradictions. Can't blame lib co-workers for that.
Bill-O is an exaggerating storyteller, and it delivers very good TV, judging by his awesome ratings. But just as nobody listens to Steven Colbert and sees him as anything more than a comedian, this is where Bill-O is now... and seeing as he's the #1 voice, #1 face, #1 show of the #1 "news" network, and fox IS standing with him...
I think FOX is telling us they're not about credible news, they are about entertainment. We get it now.
-
these kinds of stories aren't something to debate. There are contrasting statements by OReilly himself. It's not even about a co-worker hating on him. It's him saying twice "I watched nuns shot in head" then saying elsewhere "I heard about the nun shootings and decided to..." His own contradictions. Can't blame lib co-workers for that.
Bill-O is an exaggerating storyteller, and it delivers very good TV, judging by his awesome ratings. But just as nobody listens to Steven Colbert and sees him as anything more than a comedian, this is where Bill-O is now... and seeing as he's the #1 voice, #1 face, #1 show of the #1 "news" network, and fox IS standing with him...
I think FOX is telling us they're not about credible news, they are about entertainment. We get it now.
lol
My whole family - all Republicans - are voting Obama. i'm driving them to the station later - buying everyone dinner - making it a real family event.
-
All sources. You just need to decipher bullshit from reality and history.
mmm you come across as a fox news watcher ???
-
:D :D
(http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u107/Panich52/The_Next_O_Reilly_Lie_zps62918d2e.png)
-
#vindicated
Bill O'Reilly's Cameraman Smacks Down Fox News Host's Falklands Tale
Source: TPM, Mother Jones
ByBrendan JamesPublishedMarch 30, 2015, 12:21 PM EDT
More than a month after Fox News host Bill O'Reilly was called out for apparently embellishing his record covering the Falklands War in the 1980s, his cameraman at the time has disputed key facts in the story.
Mother Jones, which published one of the first reports that sparked the recent investigations into O'Reilly's work, published a statement on Monday from onetime CBS cameraman Ignacio Medrano-Carbo.
Over the years, O'Reilly had repeatedly said he'd seen people gunned down by live bullets in the streets of Buenos Aires in the 1980s when he covered "riots" there for CBS. He also said he personally rescued his cameraman, who he said had been knocked down and was bleeding from the head during the melee.
Medrano-Carbo told Mother Jones that O'Reilly's story was news to him.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ignacio-medrano-carbo-bill-oreilly-falklands
-
bring back the Loofah lady!
-
That's an asinine question. The story just came out. No one has had time to even respond to it. But the history of the left is based predominantly on lies. Their credibility is shot. Which is why you never trust a liberal.
You do realize that facts exist independent of party affiliation, that facts can be objectively verified regardless of political leanings, right?