Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: DanielPaul on July 30, 2015, 11:14:20 AM

Title: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: DanielPaul on July 30, 2015, 11:14:20 AM
If the original Hebrews ( wiggs ancestors ) were so much smarter than Caucasian counter parts, how is it that Europeans were able to construct this great astrological monument two thousand years before the pyramids?
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: denarii on July 30, 2015, 02:04:34 PM
That assumes the date of the pyramids is correct and there is evidence it might not be. The Sphinx could be 10000 yrs old
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Simple Simon on July 30, 2015, 02:10:22 PM
Has wes been consulted on this?
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Teutonic Knight on July 30, 2015, 11:23:07 PM
That assumes the date of the pyramids is correct and there is evidence it might not be. The Sphinx could be 10000 yrs old

Build by aliens (Erich van Daniken)  ;D
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Novena on July 30, 2015, 11:38:56 PM


Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Skeletor on July 31, 2015, 12:29:48 AM
(http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4031/4347588536_98d2a48bfc_z.jpg)
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: MORTALCOIL on July 31, 2015, 01:42:27 AM
Everyone knows that the Pyramids were built by the first Thong Pharaoh, Nasser The Great, despite a lacking back.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: BigCyp on July 31, 2015, 01:44:07 AM
Has wes been consulted on this?

 :D
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: DanielPaul on July 31, 2015, 04:29:27 AM
(http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4031/4347588536_98d2a48bfc_z.jpg)
lol
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Europe on July 31, 2015, 09:46:01 AM
who really knows??!

All I know is that archaeologist says that they build these Huge pyramids with copper tools, with out the invention of wheel while importing thousands of trees from mediterranean countries.. pretty stupid "theory" IMO.

According to ancient stories the Pyramids appearance were in polished limestone with the top covered in GOLD(eye that sees all), and you could literally slide if you tried to climb the pyramid. My friend who is an architect says he can not believe HOW the build those huge monuments without modern tools!!

(http://www.ancientegypt.co.uk/pyramids/story/images/pyramid.jpg)
"Twenty years were spent in erecting the pyramid itself: of this, which is square, each face is eight plethra, and the height is the same; it is composed of polished stones, and jointed with the greatest exactness; none of the stones are less than thirty feet." -Heroditus 484 BC


(http://i.imgur.com/e0Csx2C.jpg)
It's original polished limestone outer casing remains largely intact!!

Heroditus 484 B.C (called Father of history) said when he visited the Pyramids they were already Ancient!!

History is full of mysteries and I like that Getbiggers are interested in it!!

i.e  Epic of Gilgamesh.. the Giants!!
(http://i.imgur.com/Lo1ANo8.jpg)

Holding full grown lions as kittens!!
(http://i.imgur.com/g4Ifb5d.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/DqNhYpH.jpg)
good calves delevopment, Erik Fankhauser would be proud.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: TuHolmes on July 31, 2015, 09:58:12 AM
who really knows??!

All I know is that archaeologist says that they build these Huge pyramids with copper tools, with out the invention of wheel while importing thousands of trees from mediterranean countries.. pretty stupid "theory" IMO.


While I know they didn't have the "wheel" as we know it, I would think they would have used things like round logs and what not to simulate the abilities of the wheel for large structures.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Hulkotron on July 31, 2015, 09:58:59 AM
If the original Hebrews ( wiggs ancestors ) were so much smarter than Caucasian counter parts, how is it that Europeans were able to construct this great astrological monument two thousand years before the pyramids?

The Pyramids are a monumental achievement of Hebrew ingenuity and slave labor.

Lower your tone at once.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Europe on July 31, 2015, 10:05:13 AM
While I know they didn't have the "wheel" as we know it, I would think they would have used things like round logs and what not to simulate the abilities of the wheel for large structures.

that theory has been suggested and is official, however building a highly advanced complex even for todays standards with mathematical precision, also the thousands tree logs they transported from their sea-port to Giza is crazy to no think that they used some kind of wheels.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Europe on July 31, 2015, 10:11:38 AM
If the original Hebrews ( wiggs ancestors ) were so much smarter than Caucasian counter parts, how is it that Europeans were able to construct this great astrological monument two thousand years before the pyramids?

Gobekli Tepe in Turkey predates Stonehenge by 6000 yrs according to scientist.

(http://i.imgur.com/cTKonyN.jpg)
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: SuperTed on July 31, 2015, 10:22:19 AM
The Pyramids are a monumental achievement of Hebrew ingenuity and slave labor.

Lower your tone at once.

Were the ancient Egyptians even Hebrews (black)? I always thought they were a semetic type race.
The negro race are from sub Saharan Africa.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Voice of Doom on July 31, 2015, 10:27:30 AM
Gobekli Tepe in Turkey predates Stonehenge by 6000 yrs according to scientist.

(http://i.imgur.com/cTKonyN.jpg)
Gobelkli Tepe is the greatest archeological discovery in the last 100 years!  It absolutely rewrites the human timeline.  More so, they've only excavated 1 acre of a city they believe to be 70 acres in size...just in that immediate area!  Fantastic stuff.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Hulkotron on July 31, 2015, 10:34:49 AM
Were the ancient Egyptians even Hebrews (black)? I always thought they were a semetic type race.
The negro race are from sub Saharan Africa.

Not sure but Wiggs will probably be able to answer your query.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: SuperTed on July 31, 2015, 10:40:33 AM
Not sure but Wiggs will probably be able to answer your query.

Not sure if he's the best person to ask. According to Wiggs, almost everyone was black. :D
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Kwon_2 on July 31, 2015, 10:50:11 AM
Not sure if he's the best person to ask. According to Wiggs, almost everyone was black. :D

LOL yes, even the Hebrews....


and DLB
(http://oi58.tinypic.com/2cejmvn.jpg)
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Hulkotron on July 31, 2015, 10:59:53 AM
DLB has the total look of Heeb ancestry, definitely.
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: Europe on July 31, 2015, 12:25:27 PM
Were the ancient Egyptians even Hebrews (black)? I always thought they were a semetic type race.
The negro race are from sub Saharan Africa.

The Giza Pyramids weren't built by desert dwellers, much less by african sub-saharan tribes..

this will give a perspective.. notice the desert dweller on right how he dresses, looks & stands!
(http://i.imgur.com/w95OE1V.jpg)
Title: Re: Stonehenge vs Great pyramids
Post by: DanielPaul on August 02, 2015, 07:52:59 AM
Were the ancient Egyptians even Hebrews (black)? I always thought they were a semetic type race.
The negro race are from sub Saharan Africa.
Oh no doubt they were but we have fun listening to wiggs make shit up about all the blacks contribution to society and how Jesus is black and how God is black and how Adam and Eve were black and how they sat around in the garden of Eden eating  water melon and fried chicken while drinking cool aid all before the white man was ever born.