Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Palumboism on August 27, 2015, 04:10:56 PM
-
Business Insider
By Matt Rosoff Aug 27, 2015,
The Ashley Madison hack has revealed a lot of interesting things about the men who used the extramarital-dating site, including which cities, states, and universities they're from.
But what about the women?
It turns out, there may not have been very many women. As in, almost none.
Gizmodo editor-in-chief Annalee Newitz analyzed the data from the site's user database and found a lot of suspicious stuff suggesting that nearly all the female accounts were fake, maintained by the company's employees.
First, the official numbers. The info that the hackers published contained about 31 million accounts apparently belonging to men, and about 5 million apparently belonging to women.
But when Newitz dug deeper, she found a bunch of test accounts that ended with ashleymadison.com, suggesting that they were created internally (90% of them were for women), as well as 350 female accounts for people with the same and very unusual last name.
Then she found three really damning pieces of data:
Only 1,492 of the women in the database had ever opened their inbox to check their messages on the site. That's compared with more than 20 million men.
Only 2,409 of the women had ever used the site's chat function, versus more than 11 million men.
Only 9,700 of the women had ever responded to a message from another person on the site, versus almost 6 million men. (This number was greater than the number of women who checked messages because it's possible to answer messages in bulk when you first visit the site, without ever opening your inbox.)
It's possible that most of the women signed up but never did anything.
Either way, Newitz writes, Ashley Madison is a site where tens of millions of men write mail, chat, and spend money for women who aren't there."
[Snip]
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ashley-madison-bunch-dudes-talking-233158251.html# (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ashley-madison-bunch-dudes-talking-233158251.html#)
This is too funny. :D
-
Sooooo........basically just like Getbig.
-
LOL!
One big LOL!
Those fellows paid membership for nothing, just a sausagefest...
and as Shizzo so eloquently put it, just like Getbig :D
-
they had to have a booty in the entire group there also
-
Sooooo........basically just like Getbig.
;D ;D ;D
Exactly.
-
LOL!
One big LOL!
Those fellows paid membership for nothing, just a sausagefest...
and as Shizzo so eloquently put it, just like Getbig :D
You pay to post on getbig?
-
Wikipedia
Ashley Madison is a Canada-based online dating service and social networking service marketed to people who are married or in a committed relationship. Its slogan is "Life is short. Have an affair."
According to third-party web analytics provider SimilarWeb, the site has more than 124 million visits per month, as of 2015.
124 million visits per month to this sausage fest. What a scam! Those poor cheating husbands where duped big time. I wonder if any of them will sue. :D
-
Billionaire Republican Who Mocked Hillary Clinton's Marriage Had an Ashley Madison Account
Source: Gawker
A billionaire hedge fund investor and GOP donor who publicly mocked Hillary Clinton this year for being married to “a liar and a cheat” had an account on the cheating site Ashley Madison, according to data released by hackers calling themselves the Impact Team. The name and email address of Dan Loeb, founder of hedge fund Third Point LLC and prominent contributor to the Romney campaign, appear in the company’s database of users, and Loeb confirmed in a statement to Gawker that the account is authentic.
Once an Obama supporter, Loeb has since turned into a very generous supporter of Republican candidates and conservative Super PACs—he gifted $1,000,000 to the right-wing American Unity PAC and a quarter million to the Ending Spending Action Fund just last fall, along with tens of thousands of dollars straight to the Republican Party.
More recently he’s become a vocal detractor of presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. In June, he posted a joke to his Facebook page that described Clinton as a put-upon spouse trapped in a loveless marriage with a cheating husband who thinks she’s a lesbian.
Read more: http://gawker.com/billionaire-republican-who-mocked-hillary-clintons-marr-1726725925
-
How men on Ashley Madison feel right now.
(http://i.imgur.com/LnkNQnc.jpg)
-
I don't know whether the scam owners of the site should be jailed or given a medal for parting fools from their money. But not one government dollar should be wasted on figuring this out.
-
The same applies to all other dating web sites... they're all scams. A divorced friend of mine was on Match.com a few times, most of the women profiles were fake. Some of the profiles even used the same pictures of the same women.
-
So, Ashley Madison was a body building site????????
-
So, Ashley Madison was a body building site????????
Ashley Madison was Getbigs sidebusiness :D
-
Bingo!
...at least getbig is free and proud to be out of the closet
Only thing we pay here is braincells... :D
-
Even your standard dating websites like POF are probably around 75% male. The ones that are purely for sex are like 99.9% men. Any guy who pays money to join one is a fucking moron.
If a woman wants to cheat or get casual sex, she can get it everywhere and won't need to join some internet site.
-
By Annalee Newitz
Those millions of Ashley Madison men were paying to hook up with women who appeared to have created profiles and then simply disappeared. Were they cobbled together by bots and bored admins, or just user debris? Whatever the answer, the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison.
[snip]
http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944 (http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944)
So of the 37 million profiles, only .03 percent were actual women.