Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: DHEA-100 on September 05, 2015, 01:39:26 AM

Title: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: DHEA-100 on September 05, 2015, 01:39:26 AM
I think bb'ing for numerous reasons peaked around 1986.  Nowadays the whole "if you don't have it - fake it" mentality has taken the sport & fun out of it IMO.  Synthol, implants & Piana derivatives have all but destroyed bb'ing.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on September 05, 2015, 01:41:33 AM
I think bb'ing for numerous reasons peaked around 1986.  Nowadays the whole "if you don't have it - fake it" mentality has taken the sport & fun out of it IMO.  Synthol, implants & Piana derivatives have all but destroyed bb'ing.


1986, huh ? Yeah, I don't think so.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: DHEA-100 on September 05, 2015, 01:44:48 AM
Def around Yates rheign b4 Coleman.  Now no one really gives a shit.  The IFBB is realky hurtin' for $$ due to decreased public interest.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on September 05, 2015, 01:49:11 AM
Def around Yates rheign b4 Coleman.  Now no one really gives a shit.  The IFBB is realky hurtin' for $$ due to decreased public interest.


Do you even remember what the O's lineup had for competitors in the late 90's - early 2000's ? C'mon, man. Your trollin. Those lineups had REAL talent. Not like today.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Coffeed on September 05, 2015, 01:51:37 AM
Dropping womens Olympia is not something they did because of the fans, it's probably just because the money isn't there and their only savior is the boatload of bb.com folk who wanna compete in "fitness" and "figure" stuff.

Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: SaintAnger on September 05, 2015, 10:32:28 AM
Piano didn't kill bodybuilding.  Bodybuilding killed bodybuilding.

Bodybuilding is the disease.  And he's the cure.

(https://armedrobbery.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/cobra.jpg?w=655&h=305)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: mr.turbo on September 05, 2015, 11:17:28 AM
circa 1989 paris no homo

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__vIsrzSoP5U/TPp5wRR6Q5I/AAAAAAAABN4/-wBtz-Vj1TM/s1600/BobParis-FLX-WeiderHF-058.jpg)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: m8 on September 05, 2015, 11:20:58 AM
It ended near that day.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2008/99_british_grand_prix_g.jpg)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Never1AShow on September 05, 2015, 11:28:54 AM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Wiggs on September 05, 2015, 11:30:55 AM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

Very good post.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Mr Anabolic on September 05, 2015, 11:41:04 AM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

Probably has something to do with it, but I think it has a lot to do with public apathy.  Fatties on scooters have become more accepted nowadays.  I see more and more of these pathetic POS's everyday.  Why stress yourself toiling away 5-6 days/wk in a hot gym trying to get/stay in shape when you can eat all you want and ride around in a fattie scooter?  You can also claim disability and get the government to foot 100% of the bill.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2015, 11:46:58 AM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

It was not the internet.  Getting more information, photos, exposure, media, etc in every other sport has increased their popularity.

Nothing killed bodybuilding.  It's has, and always will be, a niche.  The general public couldn't give a shit about it.

In addition, a lot of us who were fans in the 90s figured out just how ridiculous and stupid it is at the higher levels.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Slik on September 05, 2015, 11:57:09 AM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.
makes absolutely no sense. Hurt magazines for sure but then why aren't all other sports dead? Haha. I said "sport".
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: SF1900 on September 05, 2015, 12:05:54 PM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

That's not bad for the schmoes.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: DHEA-100 on September 05, 2015, 12:12:05 PM
Very good post.

Agreed.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: mr.turbo on September 05, 2015, 12:28:57 PM
It was not the internet.  Getting more information, photos, exposure, media, etc in every other sport has increased their popularity.

Nothing killed bodybuilding.  It's has, and always will be, a niche.  The general public couldn't give a shit about it.

In addition, a lot of us who were fans in the 90s figured out just how ridiculous and stupid it is at the higher levels.

^^ what he said

my feeling is that it's been about the same since forever where you have this so called "sport" sitting in some nether region between a beauty pageant, pro wrestling or an actual legitimate competition.

Personally I'm a little confounded when I try to describe what we are witnessing with regard to "pro bodybuilding". I'll have to look into this matter and report back on my findings, assuming anyone cares... ;D
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Never1AShow on September 05, 2015, 03:09:22 PM
It was not the internet.  Getting more information, photos, exposure, media, etc in every other sport has increased their popularity.

Nothing killed bodybuilding.  It's has, and always will be, a niche.  The general public couldn't give a shit about it.

In addition, a lot of us who were fans in the 90s figured out just how ridiculous and stupid it is at the higher levels.

All those other sports are games and things you actually do.  Bodybuilding and its allure is because it is a visual medium along the lines of porn.  The "product" is the visual depiction of raw huge muscle.  Remember as a kid looking at those pictures and just getting that "holy fuck" reaction.  Then staring at the pics over and over thinking maybe someday you could get something close.  Now we know that cannot happen, for a variety of reasons all of which are common knowledge due to the Internet.  When I first saw those grainy pictures of Dorian in Flex magazine back in the early 90s, christ it was hypnotizing.  Or pics of Bertil Fox back in the early 80s.

Compare this to now.  For example that recent picture someone posted of Kai. I looked at it and said holy shit he's effin huge there.  But such pics are so easily obtainable and common place now that after a couple of minutes I'm like, meh.  Same with Roelly pic from a day or so back.

I still hope there is going to come some kind of technological advance that might spark a little more interest possibly.  Something like the lipstick camera did in poker to let you see the hole cards.  That made it much more interesting to watch because you could follow the action.  I'm probably dreaming though.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Royalty on September 05, 2015, 03:32:10 PM
I think also; that there has been a net reduction in the amount of "talent" (genetics) at the top of the sport.


I think that most getbig members would agree that Haney, Yates, Coleman were better than both and Cutler & Heath.

And the top national contests were more talent-filled in the 80's and 90's

Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Nails on September 05, 2015, 03:33:16 PM
(http://www.mattderody.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/generation-iron2.jpg)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Royalty on September 05, 2015, 03:38:32 PM
^^ what he said

my feeling is that it's been about the same since forever where you have this so called "sport" sitting in some nether region between a beauty pageant, pro wrestling or an actual legitimate competition.

Personally I'm a little confounded when I try to describe what we are witnessing with regard to "pro bodybuilding". I'll have to look into this matter and report back on my findings, assuming anyone cares... ;D

Vanity, at the expense of health & wellness
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Uncle Joon on September 05, 2015, 03:39:58 PM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

spot on
not to mention complete lack of characters these days.
Internet did really kill bodybuilding....BUT here is the irony
The Internet is the ONLY thing that can save bodybuilding
Got ideas but can't be bothered to explain it right now ask me tomorrow
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Nether Animal on September 05, 2015, 03:40:08 PM
BB peaked in the early '90s when Rory attempted his comeback. First pic is the best BB shot ever IMO.. too bad he couldn't bring it to the stage. Amazing physique for someone his height. Rory is an inspiration!

Fuck Kai's fetish-laden gorilla antics. What's next, is he going to fling feces at the audience? All in the name of art right..
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2015, 03:45:30 PM
All those other sports are games and things you actually do.  Bodybuilding and its allure is because it is a visual medium along the lines of porn.  The "product" is the visual depiction of raw huge muscle.  Remember as a kid looking at those pictures and just getting that "holy fuck" reaction.  Then staring at the pics over and over thinking maybe someday you could get something close.  Now we know that cannot happen, for a variety of reasons all of which are common knowledge due to the Internet.  When I first saw those grainy pictures of Dorian in Flex magazine back in the early 90s, christ it was hypnotizing.  Or pics of Bertil Fox back in the early 80s.

Compare this to now.  For example that recent picture someone posted of Kai. I looked at it and said holy shit he's effin huge there.  But such pics are so easily obtainable and common place now that after a couple of minutes I'm like, meh.  Same with Roelly pic from a day or so back.

I still hope there is going to come some kind of technological advance that might spark a little more interest possibly.  Something like the lipstick camera did in poker to let you see the hole cards.  That made it much more interesting to watch because you could follow the action.  I'm probably dreaming though.

It's a niche and you just described it as such.

Who cares if there's more interest anyway?  It's a pretty ridiculous event if you think about it - all competitors likely need to break the law, they take copious amounts of unhealthy substances, the judging is likely corrupt, and the "best" at it are the best mostly because they were just born with the genetics to meet the criteria.  Add in the thongs, the oil and everything else and it's even more ridiculous.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: SF1900 on September 05, 2015, 03:47:19 PM
It's a niche and you just described it as such.

Who cares if there's more interest anyway?  It's a pretty ridiculous event if you think about it - all competitors likely need to break the law, they take copious amounts of unhealthy substances, the judging is likely corrupt, and the "best" at it are the best mostly because they were just born with the genetics to meet the criteria.  Add in the thongs, the oil and everything else and it's even more ridiculous.

You speak so eloquently about bodybuilding.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Van_Bilderass on September 05, 2015, 04:02:25 PM
Who cares if there's more interest anyway? 

Yeah, who cares if bb is dead, dying or was never alive in the first place. Like you said, it's a niche and was always a niche. The past several decades bodybuilders bodybuilded because hardcore bodybuilding was a relatively rare thing, a way to be abnormal, a freak etc... that's part of the allure.
Bodybuilding isn't about money or throphies even for the pros, it's a largely a fetish.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2015, 04:04:42 PM
You speak so eloquently about bodybuilding.

No issues with people doing it as a personal endeavor, and none if people want to gain size and strength (although I think most people would be better off it they concentrated on conditioning more, but that's off topic).

But once you reach the "higher" levels of this stuff, it becomes retarded.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: robcguns on September 05, 2015, 04:04:50 PM
Piano didn't kill bodybuilding.  Bodybuilding killed bodybuilding.

Bodybuilding is the disease.  And he's the cure.

(https://armedrobbery.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/cobra.jpg?w=655&h=305)

Cobra was a great movie
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: chadstallion on September 05, 2015, 04:05:32 PM
their posing straps are too big.

they should be doing this sport in the nude; like the Greeks did wrestling.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Tennisballz on September 05, 2015, 04:15:55 PM
Nothing really killed bodybuilding because it was never big to begin with.  Normal people have no interest in it.  Dudes standing on stage nearly naked and comparing themselves will never be popular.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: cephissus on September 05, 2015, 04:21:09 PM
everything grape ape said...

but still, i'm sure it used to be somewhat more "popular", back when knowledge about steroids was more sparse.  now, as others have said, everyone knows this endeavor is very unhealthy.

people will always be interested in having a better physique.  now, i think most people look to youtube fitness stars and the like -- probably in greater numbers than ever followed real pro bodybuilders.  even the streamers/bloggers generally peddle shady information.  they push some "system" that has "worked for them", which they may or may not really follow, and hide behind drugs just as regular bbers.

the "problem" is and always has been fundamental to the activity: focusing on what you look like eventually becomes unhealthy.  when you start pursuing a look at the cost of strength, agility, stamina, mobility, etc. you wind up with modern "bodybuilding": a joke.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: mr.turbo on September 05, 2015, 04:22:40 PM
would someone please define and clarify the interrelationships between the "IFBB", "NPC" and "IFBB Pro league"?

Is the npc and Ifbb, the amateur feeder system that produces pros for the "pro league"? hmmm...
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: SF1900 on September 05, 2015, 04:23:53 PM
would someone please define and clarify the interrelationships between the "IFBB", "NPC" and "IFBB Pro league"?

Is the npc and Ifbb, the amateur feeder system that produces pros for the "pro league"? hmmm...

In order to become an IFBB pro, you have to quality at an NPC show. The NPC is like the little brother to the IFBB.

The National Physique Committee (NPC) is the largest amateur bodybuilding organization in the United States. Amateur bodybuilders compete in competitions from local to national competitions sanctioned by the NPC. One amateur organization per country is recognized by the International Federation of BodyBuilders (IFBB), which claims to be bodybuilding's international professional organization and the IFBB recognizes the NPC as its amateur extension for the United States.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: mr.turbo on September 05, 2015, 04:25:59 PM
In order to become an IFBB pro, you have to quality at an NPC show. The NPC is like the little brother to the IFBB.

The National Physique Committee (NPC) is the largest amateur bodybuilding organization in the United States. Amateur bodybuilders compete in competitions from local to national competitions sanctioned by the NPC. One amateur organization per country is recognized by the International Federation of BodyBuilders (IFBB), which claims to be bodybuilding's international professional organization and the IFBB recognizes the NPC as its amateur extension for the United States.

thanks  :D

ok so what exactly is the "IFBB pro league"?
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Royalty on September 05, 2015, 05:54:27 PM
You speak so eloquently about bodybuilding.

LOL

Criminals in thongs
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Radical Plato on September 05, 2015, 06:00:02 PM
Maybe if BB promoted this as the ideal it would enjoy greater support. (Yes, I know Mike is a fake natty)

(http://www.ironmanmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/moh-04.jpg)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Henda on September 05, 2015, 06:03:25 PM
I liked bodybuilding and thought it was "cool" and would get the girls when I was young and naive before I got the knternet in, the I learned it was fag shit and something to be deeply ashamed of.
Fags ruined bodybuilding
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2015, 06:09:26 PM
Maybe if BB promoted this as the ideal it would enjoy greater support.

It wouldn't.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: syntaxmachine on September 05, 2015, 07:24:44 PM
I still hope there is going to come some kind of technological advance that might spark a little more interest possibly.  Something like the lipstick camera did in poker to let you see the hole cards.

A dickhole cam to follow the action under the towel?
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Grape Ape on September 05, 2015, 07:26:28 PM
A dickhole cam to follow the action under the towel?

Dickhole cam FTW.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: MCWAY on September 05, 2015, 07:34:07 PM
The Internet actually killed bodybuilding.  For a couple of reasons.  1.  It diffused the information about drugs and spread the word to anyone who spent a week in a gym that all the pros were just walking pharmacies.  2.  It took all of the drama out of it.  No more waiting to see who won contests or waiting to see new pics.  3.  What was once a very rare commodity, pictures of huge muscular physiques, became unbelievably cheap and common place, saturating the market and killing demand through oversupply.  I'm sure there are many many more effects I'm too lazy to think of.

While this coincided with physique deterioration post Ronnie, it was more the cause than the physiques themselves.

As if some people didn't think bodybuilders were pharmacies before the web. People thought that about Arnold and his crew, too.

The web saved bodybuilding because it gave it media sources that it wouldn't have obtained or actually lost (I.e. ESPN, no more American Muscle).


Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Omega on September 05, 2015, 07:50:26 PM
(http://www.mattderody.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/generation-iron2.jpg)

GH abuse right there.
Made the lot grow weird.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: The Ugly on September 05, 2015, 07:56:49 PM
Pro bodybuilding is what's wrong with bodybuilding.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Never1AShow on September 05, 2015, 08:02:28 PM
Dickhole cam FTW.

Even the dock hole cam would have terrible camera operations just like the crappy camera operators for all the pro shows.  For Christ sake a guy is hitting a front double bi and the focus on his calves.  Shit like that's been going on forever.  And the production values are fucking amateurish.  Guys with bellies and oil towels calling the shots backstage.  It's run like a local garage sale.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Azure on September 05, 2015, 08:03:25 PM
It's a niche and you just described it as such.

Who cares if there's more interest anyway?  It's a pretty ridiculous event if you think about it - all competitors likely need to break the law, they take copious amounts of unhealthy substances, the judging is likely corrupt, and the "best" at it are the best mostly because they were just born with the genetics to meet the criteria.  Add in the thongs, the oil and everything else and it's even more ridiculous.

All of this.  

When people have to attend the shows because of family and friends, they look horrified and like they can't believe what they are watching.  It's all so ludicrous.  I also think that the competitors add to it by looking as they do.  It's not aspirational nor inspirational.  Even though I have nothing against Kai Greene, I would not want my family to attend a show where he was guest posing because I would be embarrassed.

They don't even try to make the productions interesting or professional.  It's beyond boring and lack of charismatic individuals do not help.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Coffeed on September 06, 2015, 12:59:08 AM
Quote
It's not aspirational nor inspirational.

I remember, long ago, when it occurred to me that if I could snap my fingers and have a "wish" that I actually wouldn't want to look like a professional top level bodybuilder. I enjoyed watching The Unbelievable and Pumping Iron, but when I looked at the actual physiques I realized it's not even what I would want.

Do that scenario yourself. If you could have the physique of Kai or Phil or whoever top 5... would you? Or would you prefer something like Bob Paris? (For the sake of finding out what "fans" actually want, then presume you don't need to abuse drugs 24/7.)

That's what killed bodybuilding IMO -- When the life of the "idols" are not even desirable.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Never1AShow on September 06, 2015, 09:29:01 PM
I remember, long ago, when it occurred to me that if I could snap my fingers and have a "wish" that I actually wouldn't want to look like a professional top level bodybuilder. I enjoyed watching The Unbelievable and Pumping Iron, but when I looked at the actual physiques I realized it's not even what I would want.

Do that scenario yourself. If you could have the physique of Kai or Phil or whoever top 5... would you? Or would you prefer something like Bob Paris? (For the sake of finding out what "fans" actually want, then presume you don't need to abuse drugs 24/7.)

That's what killed bodybuilding IMO -- When the life of the "idols" are not even desirable.

Pretty sure I'd choose Matt Mendenhall.  But I'd pick Phil over Paris.  Paris was too small.  Id pick Bertil Fox over Paris.  Or Samir Bannout or Charles Clairmont.  Paris was never hardcore.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: tom joad on September 06, 2015, 09:45:49 PM
is Chick still the athletes' rep?
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Radical Plato on September 06, 2015, 09:54:40 PM
is Chick still the athletes' rep?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=360750.0;attach=396402;image)
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: Ronnie Rep on September 07, 2015, 07:34:07 AM
BB peaked in the early '90s when Rory attempted his comeback. First pic is the best BB shot ever IMO.. too bad he couldn't bring it to the stage. Amazing physique for someone his height. Rory is an inspiration!

Fuck Kai's fetish-laden gorilla antics. What's next, is he going to fling feces at the audience? All in the name of art right..
Rory would have made a great Hercules.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: tom joad on September 07, 2015, 10:03:23 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=360750.0;attach=396402;image)

i'm not implying it's all on Bob, but he's been the athletes' rep during possibly the worst 10 years of bodybuilding.
Title: Re: What's wrong w/ bb'ing IMO
Post by: wes on September 07, 2015, 10:04:14 AM
No issues with people doing it as a personal endeavor, and none if people want to gain size and strength (although I think most people would be better off it they concentrated on conditioning more, but that's off topic).

But once you reach the "higher" levels of this stuff, it becomes retarded.
^^^^^THIS