Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: jaejonna on March 06, 2006, 07:23:11 AM

Title: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: jaejonna on March 06, 2006, 07:23:11 AM
The pics on flexonline seem to show that the gyno from JJ has been reduced, it is still evident but they somehow made it look better. Do you guys agree or is it just selective photography because he is a Weider athlete? I thought he had the best back Dbl Bi shot of the show.
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: 240 is Back on March 06, 2006, 07:24:07 AM
My guess is that he had it fixed.  He signed with Weider this year, got a FLEX cover, after they dropped Cook.  Perhaps they paid for the surgery.
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Dan-O on March 06, 2006, 07:30:18 AM
My guess is that he had it fixed.  He signed with Weider this year, got a FLEX cover, after they dropped Cook.  Perhaps they paid for the surgery.

If he had it fixed, the surgeon did a piss poor job!  It's still right there, hanging for all the world to see.

(http://www.flexonline.com/06contests/06arnold/menpre1/images/aack0268.jpg)(http://www.flexonline.com/06contests/06arnold/menpre1/images/aack0276.jpg)
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: DEFCON on March 06, 2006, 07:42:24 AM
I'm sure he's been popping Nolvadex like it's going out of style
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 06, 2006, 07:43:52 AM
dr navarro could fix that problem fast
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on March 06, 2006, 07:49:05 AM
Shame he has no calfs but that doesn't seem to hurt anybody these days
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: robocop on March 06, 2006, 08:07:06 AM
nice bitch tits
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Rich2 on March 06, 2006, 08:38:17 AM
it was definitely better than before.  i probably wouldn't have noticed if i hadnt been looking for it.  if you see the BFTO '05, his gyno is real bad there.  big difference. 
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: DEFCON on March 06, 2006, 09:35:10 AM
Shame he has no calfs but that doesn't seem to hurt anybody these days
they really do suck
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Cool Black Clyde on March 06, 2006, 10:58:24 AM
Preparation H is a lot cheaper than surgery.
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 06, 2006, 11:03:07 AM
Preparation H is a lot cheaper than surgery.
:)
oh yeah  around the eyes   i agree 
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: ether on March 06, 2006, 11:41:42 AM
On another note,

Why did JJ chose those posing trunks? It seriously looks like he is wearing fruit of the loom up there!
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Jr. Yates on March 06, 2006, 12:08:51 PM
wow i never noticed the calves were soo bad before! are those old pics?
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: body88 on March 06, 2006, 12:10:55 PM
I dont think it gets much worse than that calf wise

Thick ass chest
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: MisterGX on March 06, 2006, 12:58:21 PM
wow i never noticed the calves were soo bad before! are those old pics?

Old as this past Saturday at the ASC.
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Adam Empire on March 06, 2006, 05:53:26 PM
Isn't he a Muscletech athlete too?  Must have enough cash to fix this.
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: YoungBlood on March 06, 2006, 06:05:26 PM
nice bitch tits

No no no no...you have it all wrong.
The standard line is....


Monster Bitch Tits.

Get it Right!!!  :P
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: DEFCON on March 06, 2006, 06:27:02 PM
Isn't he a Muscletech athlete too?  Must have enough cash to fix this.
his tits or his calves?
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: candidate2025 on March 06, 2006, 06:35:06 PM
The pics on flexonline seem to show that the gyno from JJ has been reduced, it is still evident but they somehow made it look better. Do you guys agree or is it just selective photography because he is a Weider athlete? I thought he had the best back Dbl Bi shot of the show.
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
Post by: Jr. Yates on March 06, 2006, 08:20:43 PM
Old as this past Saturday at the ASC.
wow! Well in that pic its ridicoulsly noticable!