Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The True Adonis on October 04, 2015, 06:54:35 PM

Title: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 04, 2015, 06:54:35 PM
No benefit whatosever compared to one day a week per muscle group.

Hope this helps.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Twaddle on October 04, 2015, 06:59:18 PM
No benefit whatosever compared to one day a week per muscle group.

Hope this helps.


Does this apply to all 7.3 billion persons on earth?   ???
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 04, 2015, 07:00:08 PM
Does this apply to all 7.3 billion persons on earth?   ???
It certainly applies to you.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The Scott on October 04, 2015, 07:04:39 PM
Right now I am training two or three times a week for 30 minutes to an hour.  More than that and I simply cannot consume enough calories as I'm broke!  ;D
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 04, 2015, 07:09:47 PM
No benefit whatosever compared to one day a week per muscle group.

Hope this helps.


Then you should jump on some shit.....again.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 04, 2015, 07:15:57 PM
But ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER TRAINED EACH BODY PART TWICE PER WEEK!

Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 04, 2015, 07:16:12 PM
Then you should jump on some shit.....again.
::)
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: trapz101 on October 04, 2015, 08:39:19 PM
But ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER TRAINED EACH BODY PART TWICE PER WEEK!



So imagine if he trained once a week per muscle group  ::)
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Eric2 on October 04, 2015, 08:48:27 PM
Sometime in the last 1980s I was working out like a madman. Following the Arnold overturning methods and going nowhere yet getting a good pump. A older man around fifty came up to me one day and said unless I was o. The juice it was a waste. He instead said one body pArt per week all out till you where crippled Nd I never turned back. Made great natural gains in size and strength.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: calfzilla on October 04, 2015, 08:50:41 PM
Twice a week isn't enough.  Either train each muscle one a week or train each 6-7 days a week.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 04, 2015, 08:58:48 PM
So imagine if he trained once a week per muscle group  ::)

He would probably have like 11" arms.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Walter Sobchak on October 04, 2015, 09:05:59 PM
No benefit whatosever compared to one day a week per muscle group.

Hope this helps.


Of course. You have the testosterone levels of a 12 year old girl.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Mr.1derful on October 04, 2015, 09:11:39 PM
Of course. You have the testosterone levels of a 12 year old girl.

Also, he mistakenly believes a calorie is a calorie.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 04, 2015, 09:34:50 PM
Also, he mistakenly believes a calorie is a calorie.

Is a calorie from a snickers bar different than a calorie from chicken?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Set It Up on October 04, 2015, 09:42:14 PM
Is a calorie from a snickers bar different than a calorie from chicken?

oh good lord here we go
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Mawse on October 04, 2015, 09:42:34 PM
It does mean double the chance of injury and a much faster wear down of your joints

Just lol @ anyone in 2015 thinking there's any magic routine or frequency.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Twaddle on October 04, 2015, 09:49:27 PM
Is a calorie from a snickers bar different than a calorie from chicken?

No, they are the same.  Both are 4.184 joules of energy.  What makes up the calories is completely different though.   :D
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 04, 2015, 09:50:15 PM
No, they are the same.  Both are 4.184 joules of energy.  What makes up the calories is completely different though.   :D
Does it matter at all when the lowly nutrition needs are met?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 04, 2015, 09:51:56 PM
No, they are the same.  Both are 4.184 joules of energy.  What makes up the calories is completely different though.   :D

What do you mean, "what makes up the calorie?" A calorie exists. Its not like a calorie is made up of anything. Please expand on your answer.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 04, 2015, 09:53:25 PM
oh good lord here we go

Getbig still has not come to a definitive answer on this question!!
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Master Blaster on October 04, 2015, 10:09:02 PM
I once gained a half inch in two weeks working my arms every day...
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Simple Simon on October 04, 2015, 11:08:35 PM
Does it matter at all when the lowly nutrition needs are met?
so the calories in a bag of sugar are ued in exactly the same way as the same amout of calories in brown rice.
The body uses the same amount of energy digesting it?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: trapz101 on October 04, 2015, 11:45:00 PM
I once gained a half inch in two weeks working my arms every day...


congrats on your 14.5 inches arms now  :)
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: musclecenter on October 04, 2015, 11:50:44 PM
But ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER TRAINED EACH BODY PART TWICE PER WEEK!


x2
i train each muscle group twice per week over 40 years!
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: 2scared2post on October 04, 2015, 11:54:58 PM
so the calories in a bag of sugar are ued in exactly the same way as the same amout of calories in brown rice.
The body uses the same amount of energy digesting it?

Yes.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Simple Simon on October 05, 2015, 12:09:46 AM
Yes.
so the calories in a peice of wood is used in the same way as a bag of sugar?

can you tell me why if I eat some chocolate my veins blow up like balloons and if I eat a potato they dont.

Doest that not indicate the body utilising the calories differently?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: basil on October 05, 2015, 12:17:57 AM
Ahhhhh.  I wouldn't look at it as a "benefit", per se.  It's simply an option, depending on where you are physically/physiologically.  I don't completely dismiss another person's training philosophy b/c it does not work for me 100% of the time.  The key is self-awareness, and be cognizant of several psychological triggers that will dictate how you respond to training.  I vary from week/month, depending on my diet, training, rest, level of stress, etc. in any given week/month.  We're exposed to different stressors.  To say twice a week training (per muscle group) if of no benefit is short minded.  For me, sometimes it's effective, other times not so much.   
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Super Natural on October 05, 2015, 02:09:40 AM
I think very high frequency can work. look for eg. at gymnasts arms, mechanics forearms, speed cyclist legs these guys use or train pretty much the same muscles every day ~ sometimes multiple times a day - obviously food intake, genetics, drugs play a role too..

One thing is you have to drop back on other bodyparts when trying to bring a specific bodypart up.
I did this for back/lats as an experiment and it definitly works.

*Bought one of those pullup bars that fits in a normal door way.

Pull Up Lat Specialization Cycle


Week 1: 5 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 210 reps Total daily volume: 30 reps

Week 2: 6 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 252 reps Total daily volume: 36 reps

Week 3: 7 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 294 reps Total daily volume: 42 reps

Week 4: 8 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 336 reps Total daily volume: 48 reps

Week 5: 5 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 245 reps Total daily volume: 35 reps

Week 6: 6 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 294 reps Total daily volume: 42 reps

Week 7: 7 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 343 reps Total daily volume: 49 reps

Week 8: 8 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 392 reps Total daily volume: 56 reps

Week 9: 5 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 280 reps Total daily volume: 40 reps

Week 10 : 6 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 336 reps Total daily volume: 48 reps

Week 11: 7 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 392 reps Total daily volume: 56 reps

Week 12 : 8 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 448 reps Total daily volume: 64 reps

Week 13: 5 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 45

Week 14 : 6 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 54

Week 15: 7 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 63

Week 16 : 8 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 72

Week 17 : 9 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 81

Week 18: 5 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 50

Week 19 : 6 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 60

Week 20: 7 sets of 10   (On upper body days only) - 70

Week 21 : 8 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 80

Week 22 : 9 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 90

Week 23 : 10 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 100

Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Davidtheman100 on October 05, 2015, 02:50:44 AM
so the calories in a bag of sugar are ued in exactly the same way as the same amout of calories in brown rice.
The body uses the same amount of energy digesting it?


No they're not....insulin sensitivity is important here....You have less of a time window if you eat the same amount of 4,000 cals of brown rice and 4,000 calories of sugar....what  i mean by that is the sugar will get stored as fat FASTER than the brown rice because the brown rice will burn slower through the system and will be used more thoroughly...Comparably to someone using 500mg prop to cruise a week and using it split up into 2 days and someone else using cup (brown rice)...So with a high high sugar diet even in a surplus it's possible to gain fat while you lose muscle....because the fuel is used so quickly with the sugar unless you're eating it in small increments then you are wasting it....
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The Wizard on October 05, 2015, 03:04:13 AM

Simple - If you train hard and heavy and tax your tendons too you work the muscle once a week, if you do medium to light and work for the pump you work the muscle twice a week.

All about levels of recovery
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Simple Simon on October 05, 2015, 03:46:05 AM

No they're not....insulin sensitivity is important here....You have less of a time window if you eat the same amount of 4,000 cals of brown rice and 4,000 calories of sugar....what  i mean by that is the sugar will get stored as fat FASTER than the brown rice because the brown rice will burn slower through the system and will be used more thoroughly...Comparably to someone using 500mg prop to cruise a week and using it split up into 2 days and someone else using cup (brown rice)...So with a high high sugar diet even in a surplus it's possible to gain fat while you lose muscle....because the fuel is used so quickly with the sugar unless you're eating it in small increments then you are wasting it....
Im with you

Its numbnuts I quoted that we need to convince.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: CalvinH on October 05, 2015, 04:49:01 AM
Twice a week on arms has made a difference for me.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Mr Anabolic on October 05, 2015, 04:50:49 AM
Once per week = maintenance

Twice per week, rest days in between and food = noticeable gains.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The Wizard on October 05, 2015, 04:53:03 AM
Once per week = maintenance

Twice per week, rest days in between and food = noticeable gains.

Agreed. With reps never under 10
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Twaddle on October 05, 2015, 05:34:33 AM
Does it matter at all when the lowly nutrition needs are met?

If you care about health and longevity, then yes.   :)
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Davidtheman100 on October 05, 2015, 05:40:01 AM
The common theme is you'll have tons of people saying that twice a week training will benefit their body composition..Where as you'll see tons saying once a week is better...The thing we're missing with each person is #1 how hard are they training? Maybe if they don't hit it that hard when they're in the gym they're able to go twice as week?? And that still works for them? that's good...Maybe the person who trains twice a week is on more/less drugs?? There are tons of factors...At the end of the day it's what works best for you...You can take 5 olympia competitors and they will all train differently...I think the best way to get people to the two closest body compositions is putting them on the same drugs....Still won't be accurate because they have a different genetic structure and probably have different bases to start with...But training and diet won't mould you even close...At least drugs will get you in the realm somewhat
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Twaddle on October 05, 2015, 05:44:57 AM
What do you mean, "what makes up the calorie?" A calorie exists. Its not like a calorie is made up of anything. Please expand on your answer.

I mean, what the calorie is derived from.  Sugar, Carbohydrate, Fat, Alcohol.   :)
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Thin Lizzy on October 05, 2015, 06:21:00 AM
Do we all agree that to lose fat, one must be in a caloric deficit?

There seems to be a believe in "Low Carb Community" that you can eat as much fat as you want as long as carb intake is kept low. Of course, most who believe this are fat.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Davidtheman100 on October 05, 2015, 06:24:14 AM
Do we all agree that to lose fat, one must be in a caloric deficit?

There seems to be a believe in "Low Carb Community" that you can eat as much fat as you want as long as carb intake is kept low. Of course, most who believe this are fat.

You can lose fat in a caloric surplus with certain drugs....As a natural the only way you can do this is if it's in your beginning stages of lifting i.e the first 6-8 months where you respond to the weight training extremely well
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: NaturalWonder83 on October 05, 2015, 07:26:21 AM
Omg U guys
Just go to the gym lift and have fun
Do what ever u want

Holy crap
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Simple Simon on October 05, 2015, 08:12:41 AM
Do we all agree that to lose fat, one must be in a caloric deficit?

There seems to be a believe in "Low Carb Community" that you can eat as much fat as you want as long as carb intake is kept low. Of course, most who believe this are fat.
If you keep fats low to moderate (no more that 25%) its virtually impossible to overeat on a zero carb diet, the body self regulates and you just don't want to eat any more
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Thin Lizzy on October 05, 2015, 09:13:09 AM
If you keep fats low to moderate (no more that 25%) its virtually impossible to overeat on a zero carb diet, the body self regulates and you just don't want to eat any more

This is true with real food, but, low carb junk food has become a cottage industry. People are wolfing down Atkin bars all day at 250 calories. The fat will find ways to overeat.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on October 05, 2015, 09:13:16 AM
No benefit whatosever compared to one day a week per muscle group.

Hope this helps.

You're hardly an authority on anything to do with muscle, hth
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Simple Simon on October 05, 2015, 09:19:13 AM
This is true with real food, but, low carb junk food has become a cottage industry. People are wolfing down Atkin bars all day at 250 calories. The fat will find ways to overeat.
Low carb junk food must be high fat, thats why they over eat.
As said, watch the fat intake and you can eat as much as you like of lean protein sources.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: local hero on October 05, 2015, 10:41:03 AM
Once per week = maintenance

Twice per week, rest days in between and food = noticeable gains.


You will look exactly the same either way... Do whatever turns you on, if you want to spend hrs in the gym for less results go for it...
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Man of Steel on October 05, 2015, 10:56:25 AM
Everyone is different.  Find what works for you and do that even if the shredded competitor next door with 10 plastic bb trophies says you're crazy.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: forillagorilla on October 05, 2015, 11:02:43 AM
Omg U guys
Just go to the gym lift and have fun
Do what ever u want

Holy crap

EXACTLY !!  I don't even set a "routine" - I just go to the gym and do what I feel like doing. Some days intense and some days not so much. I will quit training before I get overly analytical.

BUT - if being anal and over-thinking is what you enjoy - then by all means do it. There is NO right or wrong answer.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Grape Ape on October 05, 2015, 11:10:25 AM
BUT - if being anal and over-thinking is what you enjoy - then by all means do it. There is NO right or wrong answer.

So then why the fuck do you always cast judgement about how much time someone posts here, reads this forum, etc?  Same rules should apply, no?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Nordic Beast on October 05, 2015, 01:50:29 PM
I'd have no life if I tried to hit every muscle twice a week.....fuck, I enjoy lifting but it's not how I make my $ and I'd rather spend the extra time with my kids.

Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Thin Lizzy on October 05, 2015, 01:55:32 PM

You will look exactly the same either way... Do whatever turns you on, if you want to spend hrs in the gym for less results go for it...

When you're young, you think you'll keep growing forever. The reality is that once you hit your mid to late 20s, you are what you are. It's all maintenance from there. Once a week is all anyone, who has been lifting for years, needs.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: SF1900 on October 05, 2015, 02:00:04 PM
So then why the fuck do you always cast judgement about how much time someone posts here, reads this forum, etc?  Same rules should apply, no?

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: MAXX on October 05, 2015, 02:10:38 PM
it's not like your muscles are evolutionary adapted to a once a week/every 7 day training schedule

nor every 3 days. That is way overtraining

every 5-6 day per muscle works better for me. some people can probably tolerate every 4 days but not many.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The Ugly on October 05, 2015, 04:05:56 PM
I never really hope anything helps. Nor do I "pity" or "feel bad for" clueless dummies, just dislike them is all.

I'm shitty that way.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Mr Anabolic on October 05, 2015, 04:48:15 PM

You will look exactly the same either way... Do whatever turns you on, if you want to spend hrs in the gym for less results go for it...

::)  yeah, okay.

For a natty, the volume and frequency have to be balanced or you'll over train.  More volume/less frequency... more frequency/less volume.  The older someone is, the potential for over training increases (again, I'm talking natty's here).  I get the best gains when I do med reps, high volume sets, and rest every other day.  Eating 5x a day (smaller meals) and making sure to get 7-8 hours sleep every night definitely helps. 
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: Hulkotron on October 05, 2015, 05:11:09 PM
Sometime in the last 1980s I was working out like a madman. Following the Arnold overturning methods and going nowhere yet getting a good pump. A older man around fifty came up to me one day and said unless I was o. The juice it was a waste. He instead said one body pArt per week all out till you where crippled Nd I never turned back. Made great natural gains in size and strength.

What did you do to compensate the old man for his assistance with your physique?
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 05, 2015, 05:43:15 PM
If you keep fats low to moderate (no more that 25%) its virtually impossible to overeat on a zero carb diet, the body self regulates and you just don't want to eat any more
Daddy Waddy used to drink Olive Oil.  It did not work well.

Your theory is shit.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: oldtimer1 on October 05, 2015, 07:01:12 PM
I love hearing bros talk about bro science.
Title: Re: After years and years of training-no benefit of twice a week per muscle group.
Post by: oldtimer1 on October 05, 2015, 07:02:50 PM
I think very high frequency can work. look for eg. at gymnasts arms, mechanics forearms, speed cyclist legs these guys use or train pretty much the same muscles every day ~ sometimes multiple times a day - obviously food intake, genetics, drugs play a role too..

One thing is you have to drop back on other bodyparts when trying to bring a specific bodypart up.
I did this for back/lats as an experiment and it definitly works.

*Bought one of those pullup bars that fits in a normal door way.

Pull Up Lat Specialization Cycle


Week 1: 5 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 210 reps Total daily volume: 30 reps

Week 2: 6 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 252 reps Total daily volume: 36 reps

Week 3: 7 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 294 reps Total daily volume: 42 reps

Week 4: 8 sets of 6 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 336 reps Total daily volume: 48 reps

Week 5: 5 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 245 reps Total daily volume: 35 reps

Week 6: 6 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 294 reps Total daily volume: 42 reps

Week 7: 7 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 343 reps Total daily volume: 49 reps

Week 8: 8 sets of 7 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 392 reps Total daily volume: 56 reps

Week 9: 5 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 280 reps Total daily volume: 40 reps

Week 10 : 6 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 336 reps Total daily volume: 48 reps

Week 11: 7 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 392 reps Total daily volume: 56 reps

Week 12 : 8 sets of 8 every day, at any time, spread out or together clustered, Total weekly volume: 448 reps Total daily volume: 64 reps

Week 13: 5 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 45

Week 14 : 6 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 54

Week 15: 7 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 63

Week 16 : 8 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 72

Week 17 : 9 sets of 9 (On upper body days only) - 81

Week 18: 5 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 50

Week 19 : 6 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 60

Week 20: 7 sets of 10   (On upper body days only) - 70

Week 21 : 8 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 80

Week 22 : 9 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 90

Week 23 : 10 sets of 10 (On upper body days only) - 100



I nearly went blind reading this. Did it work? How many pull ups could you do for one set to failure and how many after this specialized program?