Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: JOHN MATRIX on October 13, 2015, 07:23:24 AM
-
lol all of them are old and white (oh the irony)
lol 2 actual candidates
lol ratings gonna be 1/16 of the republican one
lol super soft questions
-
lol all of them are old and white (oh the irony)
lol 2 actual candidates
lol ratings gonna be 1/16 of the republican one
lol super soft questions
You pretty much summed it up...If Biden decides to go all in that leaves 3 real candidates in reality because a lot of people love Biden and he will automatically have that 10% from the get-go...It will be interesting to see how these delusional, lying sack of shit cvnts deal with the cookie cutter questions they'll be asked...Ranging from "Hilary has said she is in favor of women's rights 500,000 times in her last 2 speeches, so she clearly cares. How many times have you said it?" to things that are even more dumb...
I'm predicting that the democratic debate will have Trump mentioned many times...And it will turn into a discussion about him at one point...
-
lol all of them are old and white (oh the irony)
lol 2 actual candidates
lol ratings gonna be 1/16 of the republican one
lol super soft questions
you mean just like the Republicans (except for Carson)
what's the irony again?
you already know the questions ....please share them here
I wonder if any of the candidates will cry like whiny little bitches about the questions being unfair
Republican audiences seem to love it when their candidates do that
-
bunch of people sitting around in a room kissing Hildog's butt and bowing down before their next POTUS.......
sounds like a good time..LOL ::)
-
you mean just like the Republicans (except for Carson)
what's the irony again?
you already know the questions ....please share them here
I wonder if any of the candidates will cry like whiny little bitches about the questions being unfair
Republican audiences seem to love it when their candidates do that
Didn't know Marco Rubio was old and white...Interesting tell us more
-
More racially diverse on the republican side.
Straw man actually believes Hillary is a strong honest candidate for the Democrats.
Priceless.
-
Didn't know Marco Rubio was old and white...Interesting tell us more
And Ted Cruz.
-
Didn't know Marco Rubio was old and white...Interesting tell us more
Good point
you have so many friggin candidate that I totally forgot about him
not hard to do
-
More racially diverse on the republican side.
Straw man actually believes Hillary is a strong honest candidate for the Democrats.
Priceless.
really ?
can you please post that quote from me to prove you're not a liar
-
i'm hoping FX or AMC has something decent on.
-
And Ted Cruz.
Ted Cruz is running for president?
are you sure
the only ones I remember are TRUMP, that nutty black fundie
and Bush's brother (can't recall his name at the moment)
-
Ted Cruz is running for president?
are you sure
the only ones I remember are TRUMP, that nutty black fundie
and Bush's brother (can't recall his name at the moment)
Ted Cruz is most likely top 5-6 out of the 15 or 16 candidates i know someone just dropped out i'm not sure which one it is...But still
-
lol all of them are old and white (oh the irony)
lol 2 actual candidates
lol ratings gonna be 1/16 of the republican one
lol super soft questions
I think you are right.. but this isn't about the quality of the candidates, it's about the American people being groomed on The Bachelor, Apprentice, Jerry Springer, Honey Boo Boo and similar shows. It's about entertainment for the average citizen, and has nothing to do with political platforms.
-
Seeing how two new shows (iZombie and The Bastard Executioner) are debuting tonight, I will have to say no that I won't be watching it.
-
you mean just like the Republicans (except for Carson)
what's the irony again?
you already know the questions ....please share them here
I wonder if any of the candidates will cry like whiny little bitches about the questions being unfair
Republican audiences seem to love it when their candidates do that
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
Bernie isn't rich. He's a few hundred thousand in net worth.
-
Bernie isn't rich. He's a few hundred thousand in net worth.
He has the least amount of wealth of all of the candidates on both sides I believe.
-
lol all of them are old and white (oh the irony)
lol 2 actual candidates
lol ratings gonna be 1/16 of the republican one
lol super soft questions
Those are some pretty bold statements, you've made. It will be interesting to see how good you are at predicting the outcome of political debates.
-
More racially diverse on the republican side.
Many republicans are radical, just not always about the same issues.
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
but who wins?
-
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/breakdown-114th-congress-demographics-gender
pretty much how you would expect.. the diversity comes from the Democrats
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
They had a black man in 2012 as well. That worked out really well huh? Unlike Cain, we don't have to worry about Carson being labeled unfaithful. Carson seems to barely have the energy to stand up. No way this man is going to be exerting any effort that a physical activity like sex would require.
Indian American who has a white washed portrait of himself hanging in his office. Has to make sure people see Bobby and not Piyush.
2 Hispanics? Are you counting Jeb Bush too?
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
Pretty funny. I posted a magazine cover a few months back where they omitted the Republican minority candidates from the cover photo. Doesn't fit the narrative.
-
Pretty funny. I posted a magazine cover a few months back where they omitted the Republican minority candidates from the cover photo. Doesn't fit the narrative.
sure they did
you know an actual picture or link would be helpful
I'm guessing the so called alleged minorities Rubio and Cruz were included and kind of hard to get all 16 or 17 candidate on one magazine cover
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
LOL at your entire post
You guys got yourselves a few so called "minorities" this year and you're practically breaking your arm patting yourself on the back.
I hope you guys actually get Carson as your candidate just so you can congratulate yourself some more on your diversity and tolerance
-
Looks like a lineup of old white 1850s Slavemasters.
-
its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..
yet the repub candidates include:
-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics
while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich
LMFAO
-
Looks like a lineup of old white 1850s Slavemasters.
Are you saying they are missing the late Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd?
-
Are you saying they are missing the late Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd?
Actually come to think of it, it appears the Democrats holding the real power haven't changed much at all since the 1850s.
-
Actually come to think of it, it appears the Democrats holding the real power haven't changed much at all since the 1850s.
Well they certainly rewrote history regarding their race history. And their emphasis on government dependence is just another race-neutral form of slavery.
-
Well they certainly rewrote history regarding their race history. And their emphasis on government dependence is just another race-neutral form of slavery.
"they" sure did
All them racist Dems became Republicans
you know that
Don't you Bum
-
He has the least amount of wealth of all of the candidates on both sides I believe.
Yes, and it really says something when you consider he's a politician like all the rest except Carson.
Even Rubio has already pocketed more money than Bernie, and he's about 40 years younger.
-
Missed the first broadcast, watching it now. I'll write my report after. By the way, I am expecting an "A" on this assignment.
-
so....most boring, irrelevant debate in modern history?? :D
made the 2008-2012 republican lineup look like the dream team...
I wont be watching the others(if they even have any more), I love politics but this was painfully hard to watch it was so freaking boring
-
so....most boring, irrelevant debate in modern history?? :D
made the 2008-2012 republican lineup look like the dream team...
I wont be watching the others(if they even have any more), I love politics but this was painfully hard to watch it was so freaking boring
interesting premise of yours in this thread
you're actually bragging about past debates where your party lost the election
seems like you're desperate to find something to feel good about
The ratings for this debate were actually far greater than expected (not that ratings for debates actually matter - though you seem to think they do): http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/14/media/cnn-democratic-debate-ratings-record/
-
the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.
this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.
-
the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.
this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.
Every post i've seen of yours has been spot on and you've been looking like a real American more and more with every post i see...good stuff
You have a lot of potential to influence people for the better...I hope you continue to educate people with your political knowledge on a larger scale
-
the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.
this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.
True. Rudy or Romney would have been safe presidents, probably won re-election too.
To think, in 2016... the top 3 aren't even politicians. Carson, FioRINO and Trump... all have made some huge huge impacts, but also some really big fibs, really mean things said, really unprofessional all around.
Repub base doesn't WANT expreienced lawmakers. They want oddball, off-the-wall, unpredictable wildcard candidates.
The actual professionals aren't all that great, but solid. Rand, Rubio, Cruz, Jeb, they'd all be fine presidents. But the top 3 are jokes, truly - and it's what repubs want.
-
Watched it. Not impressed.
-
Apparently it was boring. But boring beats terrifying.
-
Every post i've seen of yours has been spot on and you've been looking like a real American more and more with every post i see...good stuff
You have a lot of potential to influence people for the better...I hope you continue to educate people with your political knowledge on a larger scale
why thank you good sir
-
the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.
this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.
Really? I personally believe that Mitt Romney can beat EVERY SINGLE Democrat running.
I don't see any of the current Republicans doing that.
-
Some may have thought the democratic debate was boring, but at least these candidates debated the issues and not who was too ugly to win, etc. The press declared Hillary Clinton the debate winner.
-
Some may have thought the democratic debate was boring, but at least these candidates debated the issues and not who was too ugly to win, etc. The press declared Hillary Clinton the debate winner.
Hillary has no problem at all with saying whatever the hell sounds good at the moment. So when someone backs her, I can't figure out what that person is backing.
???
What's the point?
-
Hillary has no problem at all with saying whatever the hell sounds good at the moment. So when someone backs her, I can't figure out what that person is backing.
???
What's the point?
When someone backs Trump, what are they backing? maybe not a fair comparison since he was not claimed the winner of the 2nd Republican debate.
-
Really? I personally believe that Mitt Romney can beat EVERY SINGLE Democrat running.
I don't see any of the current Republicans doing that.
agreed. Romney SHOULD have beaten obama, he had him on the ropes, as romney was LEADING IN POLLS after debate #1.
Then hubris got the best of him with the '47% comment' and he lost swing voters.
Romney would wreck this bunch of dems, and would laugh at trump for being an ass. Romney WOULD win this election. There's still time for his RINO ass to enter the race.
-
LMAO, Romney didn't even have the support of his own party's base, and hes is gonna somehow beat a democrat in a general??
you guys don't understand this stuff.
-
I think what he meant was that in 2012, Obama was the most beatable sitting President since Carter.
-
LMAO, Romney didn't even have the support of his own party's base, and hes is gonna somehow beat a democrat in a general??
you guys don't understand this stuff.
the repub party has moved center.
Trump is a lifetime liberal and CLinton butt-buddy.
One year ago today, Carson wasn't even a registered republican.
and they're destroying lifelong republican candidates.
Repubs today have the thinnest base of beliefs - HALF of them are relationship-cheating, drug-using lawbreakers that just hate brown people (mexicans) and black people (obama) and their willingness to ABANDON their core beliefs and support these two johnny-come-lately republicans is proof of that.
-
I think what he meant was that in 2012, Obama was the most beatable sitting President since Carter.
THIS. if the election was held:
Aug 15, 2008... Mccain wins (Palin hadn't sunk in yet)
Oct 1, 2012... Romney wins (then 47% comment broke)
-
True. Rudy or Romney would have been safe presidents, probably won re-election too.
To think, in 2016... the top 3 aren't even politicians. Carson, FioRINO and Trump... all have made some huge huge impacts, but also some really big fibs, really mean things said, really unprofessional all around.
Repub base doesn't WANT expreienced lawmakers. They want oddball, off-the-wall, unpredictable wildcard candidates.
The actual professionals aren't all that great, but solid. Rand, Rubio, Cruz, Jeb, they'd all be fine presidents. But the top 3 are jokes, truly - and it's what repubs want.
No.. no they wouldn't