Aloha snackbar
were they booing greece, there is a great rivalry between the two countriesduring the moment of silence? And is it normal for them to boo a team they don't like followed by Allahu Akbar?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/11/17/video-turkey-fans-boo-moment-of-silence-for-paris-attacks-then-break-out-into-this-chant/
Surprisingly it was a Reuters reporter that actually recorded and posted the fiasco
Who cares
Muslims s*ck. all of them. When a tv camera is around they will usually say that they regret terror and such, but in reality they approve of terrorism and killing jews, atheists, and people who believe in a different god than their prophet
Civilized society.He uses his real name here and he has Muslim friends, they will be pleased with his comment.
Are you part of it?
They also booed at the Ireland vs Bosnia soccer match. Soccer fans are the most rowdy uncaring people around. When black players come on the field, they'll throw bananas and watermelons.
lol
That's actually pretty funny I have to admit :D
Aloha snackbarlol
Vince forgot to add monkey chanting, Spain,Italy and Easter bloc's are worst for this...
They also booed at the Ireland vs Bosnia soccer match. Soccer fans are the most rowdy uncaring people around. When black players come on the field, they'll throw bananas and watermelons.
Who cares
The stadium in Turkey definitely isn't getting bomb threats like the stadium in Germany
All this Moment of Silence, Pray for ..., candle vigils etc... needs to stop. Just bullshit to make people feel important and put on a false façade that they care.
Really a moment of silence before a game? yeah, let's have a moment of silence and remember the dead for 30 seconds before we all get fucking drunk and start shouting shit at the players and each other for the next 4 hours.
All this Moment of Silence, Pray for ..., candle vigils etc... needs to stop. Just bullshit to make people feel important and put on a false façade that they care.Does not justify booing etc
Really a moment of silence before a game? yeah, let's have a moment of silence and remember the dead for 30 seconds before we all get fucking drunk and start shouting shit at the players and each other for the next 4 hours.
ADMIRALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL ACKBAR!
ADMIRALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL ACKBAR!
Does not justify booing etc
They have every right to boo. Just because you don't agree doesn't make it a rule. They are pissed because not one moment of silence was heard for anyone else that ISIS killed.
Aloha snackbar
...but,but, it's just a very small percentage of Mooslims that are radicalized. The rest of them are just a bunch of peaceful, freedom loving do-gooders.
Not true but I know you're being sarcastic. The rest of them are just normal people.
I agree it was unnecessary.
It made sense to have the minute's silence before the game involving France but it shouldn't have been mandatory for all the games. I don't agree with the jeers but it's understandable why some Turks will be annoyed after their own nation's tragedy was largely ignored globally.
The stadium in Turkey definitely isn't getting bomb threats like the stadium in GermanyTurks don't qualify as "real" muslim in most Arab countries, because of their secular democracy. Isis already killed 102 people in Turkey two months ago.
that's fine if you just want to chip in with unsubstantiated remarks we'll just have to make assumptions about what you're thinking. Feel free to clarify your opinion with regard to the "war on terror" being an exercise in irresponsible political correctness. I gather you'd like to ramp things up a bit by eliminating the limitations of political correctness. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Here's the problem...
It's well understood that the war on terror increases terrorism, it's not a secret. This was understood before the thing was launched. Recently the director of the CIA admitted this fact for example. If you remove the political correctness from the war on terror it's quite obvious you'll increase terrorism. Only crazy people want this.
THAT'S WHY BUSH MADE THAT POLITICALLY CORRECT SPEECH, SO AS NOT TO FURTHER INCREASE TERRORISM!
someone yelled something mean at the Packers game during the moment of silence.
it's what people do. who cares? both sides' people do it. Talk away, words don't hurt.
someone yelled something mean at the Packers game during the moment of silence.
I always have mixed feelings when I read something like this.
On one hand I agree that it's idiotic to believe that U.S policy can sort out the Middle East. It will either not help or make things worse.
But, not for a fraction of a second do I believe that the U.S is the cause of the problems. Without any U.S involvement at all, the Middle East would still be a shithole.
Of course, the eyes point out, not in, and it's much easier to blame others for your problems than to blame yourself.
I don't think anyone is suggesting that the middle east would be a utopia had it not been for US involvement, but more that it would be a lot better off than it is now.
Nations like Iraq were relatively stable up until the bombs began to drop.
I think it's somewhat delusional to think that these proxy wars haven't had a major impact when it comes to the rise of terrorism.
Even many patriotic Americans like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan regularly acknowledge the role US foreign policy has played in the creation of Islamic terrorism. It's not the only cause, but it is a major factor which can't be ignored.
I wouldn't equate genocide with stability, but that's just me...
I wouldn't equate genocide with stability, but that's just me...
I don't think anyone is suggesting that the middle east would be a utopia had it not been for US involvement, but more that it would be a lot better off than it is now.
Nations like Iraq were relatively stable up until the bombs began to drop.
I think it's somewhat delusional to think that these proxy wars haven't had a major impact when it comes to the rise of terrorism.
Even many patriotic Americans like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan regularly acknowledge the role US foreign policy has played in the creation of Islamic terrorism. It's not the only cause, but it is a major factor which can't be ignored.
I don't disagree with most of your post except for part about it being better without U.S involvement. I happen to be a Ron Paul guy, and have read more than my share of Mises, but, Liberatarians tend to sound like leftists with regard to foreign policy.
Without U.S involvement, the Middle East would still be a shithole of tyrannical dictators trying to keep a lid on the ever-present sectarian fighting. Just the fact that you admit that Iraq was better off under a brutal dictator like Saddam Hussain speaks volumes.
The difference is that the people would have to direct their anger, for their miserable state of affairs, solely at their own governments. U.S foreign policy doesn't create the anger. It deflects it.
I don't disagree with most of your post except for part about it being better without U.S involvement. I happen to be a Ron Paul guy, and have read more than my share of Mises, but, Libertarians tend to sound like leftists with regard to foreign policy.
Without U.S involvement, the Middle East would still be a shithole of tyrannical dictators trying to keep a lid on the ever-present sectarian fighting. Just the fact that you admit that Iraq was better off under a brutal dictator like Saddam Hussain speaks volumes.
The difference is that the people would have to direct their anger, for their miserable state of affairs, solely at their own governments. U.S foreign policy doesn't create the anger. It deflects it.