Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MAXX on December 10, 2015, 11:48:04 AM
-
pretty spot on most of it
except personally I don't want a single one of them here
-
lee priest spot on?
didnt watch. the guy's an absolute moron with huge issues.
perhaps he should be immigration minister?...
-
lee priest spot on?
didnt watch. the guy's an absolute moron with huge issues.
perhaps he should be immigration minister?...
Perhaps he should be. Fuck off libtard, go to Africa.
-
That was actually pretty good. Does anyone know if Sharia law allows a man to take a dump on a woman's chest?
-
Speaking the truth... Keep the fake blood sucking, cellphone owning "refugees" out of the farking country. (All countries).
Keep 'em where they came from... Lee has huge issues? Why, cause of ink? If he don't give a fuck, no one else should.
Schmoe's might care, thinking he ruined his appearance and now they cant spank it to him, but normal men shouldn't give a feck..
-
Lee Priest speaking the truth
-
Lee Priest laying the Smack Down on migrants.
Lot of what he says in that video sums it up quite Well.
-
Lee Priest laying the Smack Down on migrants.
Lot of what he says in that video sums it up quite Well.
Don't think he forgot one point, he summed it up perfectly imo.
-
Lee Priest needs to run for office.
-
lee priest spot on?
didnt watch. the guy's an absolute moron with huge issues.
perhaps he should be immigration minister?...
Common sense would disagree with you
-
Lee Priest speaking the truth
x1000
-
can't take the man seriously after he calls all holy books fairytales, the Abrahamic faiths follow genuine historical events and proven historical figures..
-
lee priest spot on?
didnt watch. the guy's an absolute moron with huge issues.
perhaps he should be immigration minister?...
I'm sure he could say 'I stopped the boats' at least as well as Tony did
-
Lee's opinions are are liberal compared to Trump.
-
spot on
-
can't take the man seriously after he calls all holy books fairytales, the Abrahamic faiths follow genuine historical events and proven historical figures..
Abrahamic faiths are about as historical and proven as Greek and Egyptian myths.
hth
-
Abrahamic faiths are about as historical and proven as Greek and Egyptian myths.
hth
and that's where you're wrong.. try doing some actual research instead of getting your theology from social media
there is an overwhelming amount of archaeological evidence to support the faiths, Christianity in particular.. alongside mutliple non-christian respected historical accounts from that time period
-
and that's where you're wrong.. try doing some actual research instead of getting your theology from social media
there is an overwhelming amount of archaeological evidence to support the faiths, Christianity in particular.. alongside mutliple non-christian respected historical accounts from that time period
Religion in the 21st Century is just held on to by those who can't accept that when you are dead you are dead and gone FOREVER. Life is alone on planet Earth in this solar system and that's that. You just have to make the best of it you can and are the master or mistress of your own destiny
-
lee priest spot on?
didnt watch. the guy's an absolute moron with huge issues.
perhaps he should be immigration minister?...
He actually is spot on regarding the influx of people coming to welfare states with their hands out. They're parasites with no intention of integration into their host countries. Not single 'refugee' should be allowed into any Western society. Not even one.
-
Religion in the 21st Century is just held on to by those who can't accept that when you are dead you are dead and gone FOREVER. Life is alone on planet Earth in this solar system and that's that. You just have to make the best of it you can and are the master or mistress of your own destiny
thank you for your input, fortunately you are incorrect, your beliefs are simply a display of atheism leading to a mixture of hedonism and nihilism
-
thank you for your input, fortunately you are incorrect, your beliefs are simply a display of atheism leading to a mixture of hedonism and nihilism
We are all entitled to our opinions and if it improves your life to worship a god who you believe is prepared to let 1000's of children die in agony every year, go ahead!
My beliefs are Atheism from Apatheism by the way
.
-
We are all entitled to our opinions and if it improves your life to worship a god who you believe is prepared to let 1000's of children die in agony every year, go ahead!
My beliefs are Atheism from Apatheism by the way
.
Sometimes it's better to think 'why is God prepared to let any of of us exist at all', because we know life is clearly a creation, as life cannot come from non-life, or the universe would be teeming with it, the fermi paradox is evidence of that
Although it's interesting that you care about this issue, as you've stated there's nothing after life, and without a creator life is an accident, hence life itself is meaningless which would mean suffering is of little meaning in the grand scheme of things
-
Sometimes it's better to think 'why is God prepared to let any of of us exist at all', because we know life is clearly a creation, as life cannot come from non-life, or the universe would be teeming with it, the fermi paradox is evidence of that
Although it's interesting that you care about this issue, as you've stated there's nothing after life, and without a creator life is an accident, hence life itself is meaningless, therefore a child's suffering is of no meaning in the grand scheme of things
you cant give your own definition and then disprove it by your other definition.
Being atheist doesnt mean you dont care about life. Im atheist and all human life is important in my eyes. Religion offers another "tribe" to follow... another US vs Them opportunity.
-
Sometimes it's better to think 'why is God prepared to let any of of us exist at all', because we know life is clearly a creation, as life cannot come from non-life, or the universe would be teeming with it, the fermi paradox is evidence of that
Although it's interesting that you care about this issue, as you've stated there's nothing after life, and without a creator life is an accident, hence life itself is meaningless, therefore a child's suffering is of no meaning in the grand scheme of things
Spoken like a true terrorist
-
you cant give your own definition and then disprove it by your other definition.
Being atheist doesnt mean you dont care about life. Im atheist and all human life is important in my eyes. Religion offers another "tribe" to follow... another US vs Them opportunity.
Well said sir - Being an atheist makes you value life more as you appreciate its all you have and it will be brief
-
you cant give your own definition and then disprove it by your other definition.
Being atheist doesnt mean you dont care about life. Im atheist and all human life is important in my eyes. Religion offers another "tribe" to follow... another US vs Them opportunity.
Thank you for your response. I am simply breaking the belief down to its most base element, to mirror the implied argument presented against God (He cannot exist because people suffer)
Yes religion is an aid in the creation of an already inherent Us vs Them mentality, I am in agreement with you, although we must remember people have this mentality regardless of religion, race/gender/class etc
-
Spoken like a true terrorist
Thankfully as you are quite aware, that is not a viewpoint that I hold ;D
-
Thankfully as you are quite aware, that is not a viewpoint that I hold ;D
Indeed but take care in quoting as such as that is obviously the view of the latest deluded terrorists
Enjoy your weekend
-
and that's where you're wrong.. try doing some actual research instead of getting your theology from social media
there is an overwhelming amount of archaeological evidence to support the faiths, Christianity in particular.. alongside mutliple non-christian respected historical accounts from that time period
And how would you know where my knowledge of theology comes from?
I lived in Israel and had to study the Torah in school. I read the King James bible when I was 17. I began reading the Book of Mormon when I was 18, but never actually finished. I still have yet to read the Quran. In grades 1 and 2 we learned Greek mythology, which I got very interested in and kept reading into my early teen years.
There is little historical/archaeological evidence to show that Jesus, and Moses for that matter, existed. They are most likely a compilation of different mythical prophets portrayed as one person in one of many mythological writings.
You would think that if Moses traveled with the Jews from Egypt for 40 years they would have left SOME evidence for that. We can dig up dinosaurs but can't find a shred of evidence of a major migration movement. Plus, the area they traveled shouldn't have taken 40 years. Unless Moses was really bad with directions (from God, presumably) and orientation and took everyone in circles for 40 years.
Jesus was known to walk on water and heal the blind. There was a story of a man around that same time period (I can't for the life of me remember what they called him, I'll edit this post if it comes to me) who matched up Jesus' miracles almost word for word. Meaning it was probably a compilation of stories from different places in that region.
I, personally, realized that religion was mythology when I was in kindergarten and a classmate told me about the talking serpent and the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge. As soon as I heard talking snake I immediately thought "fairy tales." Once I got older and actually read the damn books, it solidified my stance on the whole thing being a mythology. Don't get me wrong, the stories are quite interesting, not as interesting as Greek myths, but still have a few life lessons to teach. So, as a book of literature, I have nothing against it. However, as a book of faith, well... it takes a lot of faith to believe some of the stories.
-
Indeed but take care in quoting as such as that is obviously the view of the latest deluded terrorists
Enjoy your weekend
Thank you, likewise
-
Lee Priest is spot on.
-
And how would you know where my knowledge of theology comes from?
I lived in Israel and had to study the Torah in school. I read the King James bible when I was 17. I began reading the Book of Mormon when I was 18, but never actually finished. I still have yet to read the Quran. In grades 1 and 2 we learned Greek mythology, which I got very interested in and kept reading into my early teen years.
There is little historical/archaeological evidence to show that Jesus, and Moses for that matter, existed. They are most likely a compilation of different mythical prophets portrayed as one person in one of many mythological writings.
You would think that if Moses traveled with the Jews from Egypt for 40 years they would have left SOME evidence for that. We can dig up dinosaurs but can't find a shred of evidence of a major migration movement. Plus, the area they traveled shouldn't have taken 40 years. Unless Moses was really bad with directions (from God, presumably) and orientation and took everyone in circles for 40 years.
Jesus was known to walk on water and heal the blind. There was a story of a man around that same time period (I can't for the life of me remember what they called him, I'll edit this post if it comes to me) who matched up Jesus' miracles almost word for word. Meaning it was probably a compilation of stories from different places in that region.
I, personally, realized that religion was mythology when I was in kindergarten and a classmate told me about the talking serpent and the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge. As soon as I heard talking snake I immediately thought "fairy tales." Once I got older and actually read the damn books, it solidified my stance on the whole thing being a mythology. Don't get me wrong, the stories are quite interesting, not as interesting as Greek myths, but still have a few life lessons to teach. So, as a book of literature, I have nothing against it. However, as a book of faith, well... it takes a lot of faith to believe some of the stories.
I am glad to hear you are reasonably well read on the topic, the fault, as you know, is that you are intentionally interpreting figurative stories literally, you mention the talking snake and so on, you are aware we must have discernment in our interpretation, it seems you read into this literally.
As we know, Jesus himself was a real man, confirmed not only by the eyewitness accounts of the New Testament, but also by non-biblical historians as well as archaeological finds. Which leaves the conclusion, Jesus was either a magician, a maniac or the messiah, and that is your free will to decide.
It does take a lot of faith yes, but that doesn't make it untrue. It also takes a lot of faith to believe much of mainstream science which endeavours to deny God.
-
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/10/europe/amputee-soldier-muslim-facebook-donald-trump/
-
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/10/europe/amputee-soldier-muslim-facebook-donald-trump/
(https://media.giphy.com/media/xTiTnIdG44UV8Lkl4A/giphy.gif)
-
I am glad to hear you are reasonably well read on the topic, the fault, as you know, is that you are intentionally interpreting figurative stories literally, you mention the talking snake and so on, you are aware we must have discernment in our interpretation, it seems you read into this literally.
As we know, Jesus himself was a real man, confirmed not only by the eyewitness accounts of the New Testament, but also by non-biblical historians as well as archaeological finds. Which leaves the conclusion, Jesus was either a magician, a maniac or the messiah, and that is your free will to decide.
It does take a lot of faith yes, but that doesn't make it untrue. It also takes a lot of faith to believe much of mainstream science which endeavours to deny God.
Science doesn't "deny god."
Science explains natural phenomenon which can be reproduced over and over.
Every time religion has tried to explain natural phenomenon, they'd say "God did it." While science says "we don't know why this happens. Lets find out and see if our theories are reproducible over and over in the real world."
I'll give you an example. When I was a kid, my grandma told me of her grandmother who said that if you leave milk out it will spoil because the devil will spit in it, but if its hidden in the fridge, the devil will not get to it. Clearly, we know that milk spoils because of bacteria, and not because Satan spit into it.
The biggest debate right now in science vs religion is where did the universe come from? Religion's answer is, of course, God made it. Science hypothesizes the big bang, but this is only the dominant theory, there are other more fringe theories which have not stood up to the evidence we've gathered thus far. But in the end, scientists will say "we don't know all the details yet, but one day, we will get there and will be able to explain the big bang and put all the pieces together. And if the pieces do not come together, then we toss that theory and try to come up with a new one to explain everything." This requires critical thinking, something religion lacks.
-
Science doesn't "deny god."
Science explains natural phenomenon which can be reproduced over and over.
Every time religion has tried to explain natural phenomenon, they'd say "God did it." While science says "we don't know why this happens. Lets find out and see if our theories are reproducible over and over in the real world."
I'll give you an example. When I was a kid, my grandma told me of her grandmother who said that if you leave milk out it will spoil because the devil will spit in it, but if its hidden in the fridge, the devil will not get to it. Clearly, we know that milk spoils because of bacteria, and not because Satan spit into it.
The biggest debate right now in science vs religion is where did the universe come from? Religion's answer is, of course, God made it. Science hypothesizes the big bang, but this is only the dominant theory, there are other more fringe theories which have not stood up to the evidence we've gathered thus far. But in the end, scientists will say "we don't know all the details yet, but one day, we will get there and will be able to explain the big bang and put all the pieces together. And if the pieces do not come together, then we toss that theory and try to come up with a new one to explain everything." This requires critical thinking, something religion lacks.
Thank you for your input, I'm quite aware of what science is and don't require your thoughtful explanation. As you know I didn't say science denies God, I said it endeavours to. Although much of modern science simply proves His existence and there are plenty of scientific experts that could explain this in much greater detail than I
Your example is rather pointless, as no religion answers the question of why milk spoils
-
Thank you for your input, I'm quite aware of what science is and don't require your thoughtful explanation. As you know I didn't say science denies God, I said it endeavours to. Although much of modern science simply proves His existence and there are plenty of scientific experts that could explain this in much greater detail than I
Your example is rather pointless, as no religion answers the question of why milk spoils
How about a single example?
Just one.
You must know something the rest of the world doesn't. Please enlighten us.
-
How about a single example?
Just one.
You must know something the rest of the world doesn't. Please enlighten us.
-
Show the peer reviewed example where the overwhelming consensus among scientists is that there is indeed evidence God exists instead of someone's opinion.
-
Show the peer reviewed example where the overwhelming consensus among scientists is that there is indeed evidence God exists instead of someone's opinion.
aw, you could have at least watched the video you asked for ::)
-
That was actually pretty good. Does anyone know if Sharia law allows a man to take a dump on a woman's chest?
hahahaha