Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: garraeth on March 08, 2006, 07:59:58 PM

Title: .
Post by: garraeth on March 08, 2006, 07:59:58 PM
.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: 240 is Back on March 08, 2006, 08:01:00 PM
hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahaha
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: 300 on March 08, 2006, 08:01:52 PM
We have a new world record!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bigkid on March 08, 2006, 08:03:12 PM
how the fuck does that happen.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Oldschool Flip on March 08, 2006, 08:08:40 PM
Guy actually works at Jiffy Lube and he's the one who empties your oil pan and "disposes" all the old oil.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: SLYY on March 08, 2006, 08:12:50 PM
what a tard....
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 08, 2006, 08:14:01 PM
Curls with 52 lb. :D GV's already jealous.

OMG there IS a synthol users group.  ???

I want the explanation from this bozo as to what the point is..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 08, 2006, 08:14:27 PM
lol is that reversable?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Dan-O on March 08, 2006, 08:20:05 PM
It looks like he caught a case of arm cancer and you guys are making fun of him! :o


He might not have much longer to live. :'(
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: phyxsius on March 08, 2006, 08:21:30 PM
There's where he kept his cooking oil in case they ran out
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 08, 2006, 08:22:46 PM
He is probably feeling the same tighness around his skin as a women is when she is having rugh sex.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: tommywishbone on March 08, 2006, 08:28:53 PM
silly boy
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 08, 2006, 08:37:26 PM
It looks like he caught a case of arm cancer and you guys are making fun of him! :o


He might not have much longer to live. :'(

u r right his hands indicate heart condition
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: quadzilla456 on March 08, 2006, 08:50:48 PM
That is crazy! It looks like shit and very painful too. WTF was he thinking.  ???

What a moron!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 08, 2006, 08:53:28 PM
...there's about 15 of them in the synthol yahoo group: http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/synthol

...just posted today...

Is Stone Cold really a medic?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:20:55 PM
GODDAMNIT!


That is NOT Synthol. Synthol(Synthetic oil) dissipates like any injected oil does..Just like Oil Based Testosterone Does.

THERE IS NO PHISOLOGICAL WAY OIL COULD POSSIBLY DO THAT!

This guy has silicone implants. Just like what you see in those women who have 30lb breasts..It's EXACTLY the same thing.

Oil injected into the muscle DISSIPATES AFTER A FEW WEEKS


That Yahoo Group doesn't have any of these actuall people as members. It was created by some moron who doens't know shit about human physiology.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Farcry on March 08, 2006, 09:25:02 PM
he must curl 500 pounds with arms like those :o
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 08, 2006, 09:25:12 PM
Looks like somebody just admited to inject synthol..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: iron_dawg on March 08, 2006, 09:26:08 PM
he looks like hell who would want that look
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:29:34 PM
Johnny Apollo is an idiot.


Also, post the rest of the pics for those of us that don't have a yahoo id.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: earthbound on March 08, 2006, 09:31:43 PM
Apollo isn't an idiot, he's right.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:32:13 PM
This is exactly the same thing this guy has...Except in the Arms.


(http://www.brustverein.de/promo/bilder/dsc00139.jpg)


Thanks iron_dawg.


It's NOT Synthol. Synthol like all oil dissipates after a few weeks. You idiots need to do some goddamn research.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:32:34 PM
Apollo isn't an idiot, he's right.


Correction: Earthbound and Johnny Apollo are both idiots.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:35:56 PM
went to chris-hofer.com

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:37:56 PM
I don't think you guys know what implants are, or what Synthol does to a human body.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:38:28 PM

Correction: Earthbound and Johnny Apollo are both idiots.


How so?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:40:12 PM

How so?

Exactly.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:43:57 PM
I don't think you guys know what implants are, or what Synthol does to a human body.




I know several people who have used Synthol in the past. It's injected into the heads of the muscles to cause oil to enter the muscle and then after a few weeks it naturally dissipates. Once it dissipates there is a room left over where the synthol used to be,REAL muscle can be grown there. The temporary hollow area is a highly anabolic environment which causes the muscle to naturally "fill out" and fill the area that the oil used to be. New muscle fibers form to fill the area within a few weeks and then you have actuall real muscle replacing it.

This guy has IMPLANTS. There is NO WAY this can be caused by simple synthol injections. I won't repeat myself again...OIL DISSIPATES. Any sort of liquid injected into the muscles or which forms in the muscles dissipates. Anyone who's ever injected testosterone into therself knows that it dissipates.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:44:58 PM
Exactly.

Exactly what? You can't even explain your accusations. You call someone stupid and then won't explain HOW they are stupid?
Your accusations are completly baseless and empty, As is your fucking head.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Captain Equipoise on March 08, 2006, 09:45:59 PM
Not all oil dissipates, if the body can't break it down, it will just stay there, some will get absorbed but there would still be lumps. Either way, that guys is just plain RETARDED... oh, monster chest development.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 08, 2006, 09:46:51 PM
Exactly what? You can't even explain your accusations. You call someone stupid and then won't explain HOW they are stupid?
Your accusations are completly baseless and empty, As is your fucking head.

Two things: 1) Hello True Adonis, 2) I know you know that it's not an implant and you're just trying to get a rise out of people.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 08, 2006, 09:47:58 PM
I want the interview with this clown explaining WTF he's done to himself.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:50:51 PM
Not all oil dissipates, if the body can't break it down, it will just stay there, some will get absorbed but there would still be lumps. Either way, that guys is just plain RETARDED... oh, monster chest development.



I've never known anyone who injected any oil that didn't dissipate within a few weeks.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 08, 2006, 09:51:38 PM
Two things: 1) Hello True Adonis, 2) I know you know that it's not an implant and you're just trying to get a rise out of people.


1)I've already Proven it has.

2)You have failed to refute my proof.

3)You have no argument or knowledge of human physiology so please stop making a fool of yourself.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: iron_dawg on March 08, 2006, 09:55:15 PM
it is tittays Johnny
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: tony b on March 08, 2006, 11:21:27 PM
Monster delts....



Seriously this guy looks even worse than GV. At least Valentino and Klaus have done something to there pecs and delts as well. This guy is just softing out.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Disgusted on March 09, 2006, 12:05:45 AM
I heard the guy site injected 10,000 mg of Anadrol, but injected the tabs by mistake.  :P
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: LeePriestLover on March 09, 2006, 12:21:09 AM
This is exactly the same thing this guy has...Except in the Arms.


(http://www.brustverein.de/promo/bilder/dsc00139.jpg)


Thanks iron_dawg.


It's NOT Synthol. Synthol like all oil dissipates after a few weeks. You idiots need to do some goddamn research.

Wow, that man has big tits.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Scimowser on March 09, 2006, 01:54:12 AM
hnoestly, i think these people need to be seen to by a specialist. Cant they see what they have done? I cant believe he has the fukking audacity to pose with those arms, does he really think people look at him and say "fukk me, monster genetics!"? His whole physique is shit, yet he probably prances around thinking hes Gods gift to women
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Mars on March 09, 2006, 01:58:30 AM
went to chris-hofer.com



What a fucking tool, sad thing is the people around him sees him as a very muscled guy haha.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: gordiano on March 09, 2006, 02:02:26 AM
Whatever the fuck he's done to his arms, it looks like shit.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: DEFCON on March 09, 2006, 04:05:57 AM
he looks decent
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Gord on March 09, 2006, 04:20:54 AM
I'm surprised the men in the white coats haven't caught up with him yet.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: simon on March 09, 2006, 04:50:42 AM
what kinda of mad-scientist/dr/plastic surgeon whatever would put an implant like that into somebody??????????????       
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 09, 2006, 05:24:21 AM
If you look at the pictures that I posted, you can literally see collapsed veins.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: c-u-n-hell on March 09, 2006, 05:40:51 AM
I dont know if it is synthol or not but a friend of mine put T 400 in his legs and it did not disapate and after a few injections his leg swelled up the same way. He could not bend is leg and had to see a Dr to get in sucked out so it may be synthol or not but not all oil disapates
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: shutupandtrain88 on March 09, 2006, 05:59:45 AM
oil, implants, whatever, the guy is a clown, just like every other clown, gv included that has made themselves look like this.  ass clown is a better description.  and how did you you prove your point athesist?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Dan-O on March 09, 2006, 06:07:55 AM
They sure as hell aren't implants.  Who would implant something so shapeless and blobby into their arms?  Those arms look like 20 lbs. of shit stuffed into two five-lb. bags.

Arm implants at least have a definite shape to them.  For an example, see the pics of Lee Apperson taken a while back.  Although implants still look obviously fake, at least they don't look like big bags of shit.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 09, 2006, 06:12:50 AM
They sure as hell aren't implants.  Who would implant something so shapeless and blobby into their arms?  Those arms look like 20 lbs. of shit stuffed into two five-lb. bags.

Arm implants at least have a definite shape to them.  For an example, see the pics of Lee Apperson taken a while back.  Although implants still look obviously fake, at least they don't look like big bags of shit.

LOL @ big bags of shit!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: richbmraz03 on March 09, 2006, 07:03:59 AM
Freakin IDIOT, What was this guy thinking? That it look's good. Not. What an Embarassement to any sport ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Ex Coelis on March 09, 2006, 07:47:00 AM
what a nad
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 09, 2006, 08:09:15 AM
This guy is Dexter's Motivation!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: sarcasm on March 09, 2006, 08:11:04 AM
can you imagine how bad this dude was abused as a kid?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 09, 2006, 08:11:24 AM
why is the geek in the tractor pulling his hair out
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 09, 2006, 08:12:36 AM
why is the geek in the tractor pulling his hair out

I think it's just a bored kid
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: weedoutheweak on March 09, 2006, 08:14:55 AM
http://www.chris-hofer.com/foto/db/thumbnails.php?album=19


Someone translate this, so we can find more pictures of this guy.  This "event" happened in October. 
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: HICKSON on March 09, 2006, 08:15:05 AM


I know several people who have used Synthol in the past. It's injected into the heads of the muscles to cause oil to enter the muscle and then after a few weeks it naturally dissipates. Once it dissipates there is a room left over where the synthol used to be,REAL muscle can be grown there. The temporary hollow area is a highly anabolic environment which causes the muscle to naturally "fill out" and fill the area that the oil used to be. New muscle fibers form to fill the area within a few weeks and then you have actuall real muscle replacing it.

This guy has IMPLANTS. There is NO WAY this can be caused by simple synthol injections. I won't repeat myself again...OIL DISSIPATES. Any sort of liquid injected into the muscles or which forms in the muscles dissipates. Anyone who's ever injected testosterone into therself knows that it dissipates.

That is the stupidest thing I have ever read. You sir are a nominee for the DUMBEST f**cker on GetBig... congratulations

(quoted)
Synthol is composed of 85% medium-chain triglyceride oils (a fatty acid), 7.5% lidocaine (painkiller), and 7.5 5 benzyl alcohol. The preparation is injected deep into the muscle where it is encapsulated between the fascicles (bundles of muscle fibers) . With repeated injections, a larger volume of oil builds up inside the muscle, expanding its size like a balloon filling up with air. About 30% of what is injected is metabolized by the body. The other 70% remains lodged in the muscle where it breaks down very slowly over three to five years. There seems to be some issue of debate among bodybuilders as to whether or not Synthol actually lasts this long, and some believe it is even longer. Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible. Synthol users report amazing pumps while training, though this could be a result of the extra pressure of the accumulated oil.

Risks Of Synthol Use

Although Mr. Clark claims Synthol is completely safe to use, he also made a point in Greg Zulak's "Uncensored" several issues ago that he is not legally responsible for bodybuilders using it for anything other than a posing oil. Of course, injecting any amount of fatty-acid material intramuscularly can be perilous. This is complicated by the fact that scant few bodybuilders have any medical training. Without knowing the location of major nerves, it's easy to hit one by accident and cause permanent paralysis of muscle fibers in the area. With an injection of any type, abscess infections at the injection site are always a possibility. Often abscesses (extremely painful build-ups of infected tissue) require surgery to remove, not unlike a tumor. You haven't heard the worst yet. Should you inject into a vein or artery by mistake (avoided by drawing back on the syringe to make sure there is no blood, a simple precaution many folks are too squeamish to take) the fatty acids could be transported to the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism, the heart, causing a heart attack, or perhaps even into the brain, leading to a cardioembolic stroke. All three cases are potentially fatal.

Allegedly, IFBB pro Milos Sarcev had a scare recently when supposedly, some of the Synthol in his arms traveled to his heart. This sounds like an enormous amount of risk simply for the benefit of inflated arms and calves, but bodybuilders are not normal people. To some, it's worth the risk of death to finally have 21-inch bazookas just like the big genetic freaks they idolize. To date, there have been no publicized deaths related to Synthol or any of its several knock-offs currently available. Of course, this is a fairly new product that has only skyrocketed in use over the past two years. Ultimately, Synthol users are adults who are responsible for their own health and safety and are free to make the choice themselves.


Hurry its time for your weekly hot oil injection.....
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 08:32:58 AM
Adonis just got owned ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: dmorgan41178 on March 09, 2006, 08:37:48 AM
johnny is a retard and he is sarcasm, mars, broadstreetbrawler, true andonis, and god knows who else.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: buffbodz on March 09, 2006, 08:41:32 AM
You see alot of these clown in Europe.  A friend who went to FIBO last year said he say  alot of dudes who had nothing but 27" guns thinking they are bodybuilders.  They were the bigest joke at the expo.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Mars on March 09, 2006, 08:48:22 AM
Das harte Training hat sich also ausgezahlt: Zweimal am Tag traf man den 1,82 Meter großen und 113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann vor dem Rekordversuch in der Kraftkammer, Lkw-Ziehen übte er zwei- bis dreimal in der Woche.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 08:55:36 AM
Das harte Training hat sich also ausgezahlt: Zweimal am Tag traf man den 1,82 Meter großen und 113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann vor dem Rekordversuch in der Kraftkammer, Lkw-Ziehen übte er zwei- bis dreimal in der Woche.

Mars if you don't start talking in english you won't get any souper tonight.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 09, 2006, 09:00:20 AM
Maybe it's an oil that doesn't dissipate slowly.

It's pretty hard to believe that a self-respecting doc would put implants in a guy which would be that disfiguring.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Euro-monster on March 09, 2006, 09:51:49 AM
Das harte Training hat sich also ausgezahlt: Zweimal am Tag traf man den 1,82 Meter großen und 113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann vor dem Rekordversuch in der Kraftkammer, Lkw-Ziehen übte er zwei- bis dreimal in der Woche.

hahahahahaaa what a stupid German mothafucka.... ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Mars on March 09, 2006, 09:55:21 AM
Especially the "113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann" haha.

If that dude was on this forum he probably called himself "Euro Monster"
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Naked4Jesus on March 09, 2006, 10:02:29 AM
This guy is Dexter's Motivation!

Oh no he didn't just try to be a strong man!  He must seriously believe synthol gives you secret, special, muscle powers...LOL ;D

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Peaking at 45 !!! on March 09, 2006, 10:37:25 AM
I'm popeye the sailor man, I'm popeye the sailor man...

 ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Peaking at 45 !!! on March 09, 2006, 10:40:03 AM
 >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(


Gosh darn all you haters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Did it ever occur to you all that maybe he just trains his arms extra hard ???


You shouldnt comment until you know all the facts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 09, 2006, 10:48:39 AM
Does that make him a natty?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 09, 2006, 10:55:15 AM
Quote
Did it ever occur to you all that maybe he just trains his arms extra hard

Y-you mean he's not natural? ???
hahahahahahahahahahahaha ahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahah ah
hahahahahahahahahahahaha ahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahah ah
hahahahahahahahahahahaha ahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahah ah
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 09, 2006, 11:34:29 AM
Let's, for a minute pretend that synthol (by some unknown mechanism) creates an anabolic environment once it dissipates.

Why then, do you never, ever, ever, ever...... ever see those guys lifting more than fairy weight?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: coopsma on March 09, 2006, 11:43:36 AM
This guy does not train just his arms. If he did, his forearms and delts would have a bit more muscle and definition.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Sir William Idol on March 09, 2006, 11:59:08 AM
This guy does not train just his arms. If he did, his forearms and delts would have a bit more muscle and definition.

i know you're busy as head engineer designing that new space station, but i for one appreciate you taking the time to inform us of this.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 09, 2006, 12:00:07 PM
Willy the dick Idol with more valuable content of his own.  ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 12:01:15 PM
Willy the dick Idol with more valuable content of his own.  ::)

lol
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Sir William Idol on March 09, 2006, 12:14:11 PM
alexxx liked that one pumpster, i think you two just might be perfect for each other


and most girls i've dated do call me The Dick, so you're right with that one
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 12:16:59 PM
alexxx liked that one pumpster, i think you two just might be perfect for each other


and most girls i've dated do call me The Dick, so you're right with that one


They call you the dick because you are missing the top part. When you had to cut it off to join the operah.. then the girls started laughing at your pathetic attemps at them because they new your a 2 time fag.  :-[
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Sir William Idol on March 09, 2006, 12:37:19 PM

They call you the dick because you are missing the top part. When you had to cut it off to join the operah.. then the girls started laughing at your pathetic attemps at them because they new your a 2 time fag.  :-[


some of your best work here alexxx.  i can see you put as much heart into your comedy as you do your brutal leg workouts.   you should be proud of that.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on March 09, 2006, 12:44:50 PM
Das harte Training hat sich also ausgezahlt: Zweimal am Tag traf man den 1,82 Meter großen und 113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann vor dem Rekordversuch in der Kraftkammer, Lkw-Ziehen übte er zwei- bis dreimal in der Woche.

It translates to this...wtf?
Hard training disbursed itself thus: Twice on day one met the 1.82 meters large and 113 Kilos heavy muscle man before the record attempt in the force chamber, truck pulling practiced he two until three times in the week.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Euro-monster on March 09, 2006, 01:41:32 PM
Especially the "113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann" haha.

If that dude was on this forum he probably called himself "Euro Monster"

Why would he want to steal a name from a guy who looks like a Greek god?... ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: fearANDloathing on March 09, 2006, 01:43:49 PM
He makes G.V look like Flex Wheeler
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bigbalddaddy on March 09, 2006, 01:57:24 PM
hahahahaha!!!!  What if someone stabbed his ass in the arm?  How funny would that be?  What would the guy stabbing him think when all kinds of liquid spewed out on the ground?  OMG, what a jackass!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 01:59:41 PM
Where does he get the strengh to pull that heavy ass truck?  ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Unchained81 on March 09, 2006, 03:33:58 PM
Monster delts....



Seriously this guy looks even worse than GV. At least Valentino and Klaus have done something to there pecs and delts as well. This guy is just softing out.

The first time I saw Valvolino I thought "it can't get any worse."  Then I saw Klaus.  But some of these guys, like this one, make those two look like Arnold and Lee Haney.  I mean, how bad are you if you make Klaus look Aesthetic?  LOL.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: chrisco57 on March 09, 2006, 03:44:40 PM
what if.....your at the airport behind this guy, and security wants him to show them what the hell he might be smuggling in there!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 03:47:59 PM
That is the stupidest thing I have ever read. You sir are a nominee for the DUMBEST f**cker on GetBig... congratulations

(quoted)
Synthol is composed of 85% medium-chain triglyceride oils (a fatty acid), 7.5% lidocaine (painkiller), and 7.5 5 benzyl alcohol. The preparation is injected deep into the muscle where it is encapsulated between the fascicles (bundles of muscle fibers) . With repeated injections, a larger volume of oil builds up inside the muscle, expanding its size like a balloon filling up with air. About 30% of what is injected is metabolized by the body. The other 70% remains lodged in the muscle where it breaks down very slowly over three to five years. There seems to be some issue of debate among bodybuilders as to whether or not Synthol actually lasts this long, and some believe it is even longer. Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible. Synthol users report amazing pumps while training, though this could be a result of the extra pressure of the accumulated oil.

Risks Of Synthol Use

Although Mr. Clark claims Synthol is completely safe to use, he also made a point in Greg Zulak's "Uncensored" several issues ago that he is not legally responsible for bodybuilders using it for anything other than a posing oil. Of course, injecting any amount of fatty-acid material intramuscularly can be perilous. This is complicated by the fact that scant few bodybuilders have any medical training. Without knowing the location of major nerves, it's easy to hit one by accident and cause permanent paralysis of muscle fibers in the area. With an injection of any type, abscess infections at the injection site are always a possibility. Often abscesses (extremely painful build-ups of infected tissue) require surgery to remove, not unlike a tumor. You haven't heard the worst yet. Should you inject into a vein or artery by mistake (avoided by drawing back on the syringe to make sure there is no blood, a simple precaution many folks are too squeamish to take) the fatty acids could be transported to the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism, the heart, causing a heart attack, or perhaps even into the brain, leading to a cardioembolic stroke. All three cases are potentially fatal.

Allegedly, IFBB pro Milos Sarcev had a scare recently when supposedly, some of the Synthol in his arms traveled to his heart. This sounds like an enormous amount of risk simply for the benefit of inflated arms and calves, but bodybuilders are not normal people. To some, it's worth the risk of death to finally have 21-inch bazookas just like the big genetic freaks they idolize. To date, there have been no publicized deaths related to Synthol or any of its several knock-offs currently available. Of course, this is a fairly new product that has only skyrocketed in use over the past two years. Ultimately, Synthol users are adults who are responsible for their own health and safety and are free to make the choice themselves.


Hurry its time for your weekly hot oil injection.....



Everything you copied and pasted agrees with what I said except for the 70% bit. Which is of course incorrect.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: HRDCOR on March 09, 2006, 03:49:02 PM
The guy is a retarted attention whore , why elese would you bother !!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 03:57:45 PM
It translates to this...wtf?
Hard training disbursed itself thus: Twice on day one met the 1.82 meters large and 113 Kilos heavy muscle man before the record attempt in the force chamber, truck pulling practiced he two until three times in the week.



You used a translator and those don't correctly translate what it says...


Quote
Das harte Training hat sich also ausgezahlt: Zweimal am Tag traf man den 1,82 Meter großen und 113 Kilo schweren Muskel-Mann vor dem Rekordversuch in der Kraftkammer, Lkw-Ziehen übte er zwei- bis dreimal in der Woche.

The hard training is disbursed as: Twice a day we met the 5'9" tall and 349lb heavy muscle man before the record attempt in the "Force chamber", Truck Pull he practiced two to three times in the week.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 03:59:25 PM
Let's, for a minute pretend that synthol (by some unknown mechanism) creates an anabolic environment once it dissipates.

Why then, do you never, ever, ever, ever...... ever see those guys lifting more than fairy weight?


Because guys like Klaus Dornig,Valentino and this guy DO NOT USE SYNTHOL. What they have are silicone implants. THAT is why they use tiny weights,Because it's not real muscle but implants.


Try to follow along and learn to read.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: sarcasm on March 09, 2006, 03:59:28 PM
113 kilos is actually 249 lbs. not 349.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 04:22:10 PM
113 kilos is actually 249 lbs. not 349.


That's what I meant to say....
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: GigantorX on March 09, 2006, 04:48:58 PM
Okay, so, if those are implants as whatever his name says they are, how exactly do you make them that huge and soggy looking? My vision of silicone implants is like the calf implants, a sheath of material put under or on top of the muscle. How the hell does he have an implant that big? I can understand why some might think its synthol. But really, how the hell do they look like that? Explain that one.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: alexxx on March 09, 2006, 04:53:11 PM
Also while you're at it Captain Apollo... explain to us why you got but implants.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Snotroot on March 09, 2006, 04:55:22 PM
if they are implants, wouldn't Gregg have popped his when he was jamming the needle in to them on the TV program?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: chrisco57 on March 09, 2006, 05:06:34 PM
if they are implants, wouldn't Gregg have popped his when he was jamming the needle in to them on the TV program?
probably has some fix-a-flat mixed in there
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 05:17:47 PM
Okay, so, if those are implants as whatever his name says they are, how exactly do you make them that huge and soggy looking? My vision of silicone implants is like the calf implants, a sheath of material put under or on top of the muscle. How the hell does he have an implant that big? I can understand why some might think its synthol. But really, how the hell do they look like that? Explain that one.


There are different kinds of implants. The more massive they are they more they look "Soggy",as you can see from that picture of that woman I posted with those breast implants.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 09, 2006, 05:24:03 PM
if they are implants, wouldn't Gregg have popped his when he was jamming the needle in to them on the TV program?


They probably popped years ago and the silicone started to drift to his triceps and shoulders. It starts to harden after a few years also.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Disgusted on March 09, 2006, 05:41:41 PM
if they are implants, wouldn't Gregg have popped his when he was jamming the needle in to them on the TV program?

Body implants are solid silicone.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: EVL R33 on March 09, 2006, 06:12:26 PM
Why don't any of these ass clowns inject that crap into their forearms as well?  At least it would then look slightly more proportionate..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: chrisco57 on March 09, 2006, 06:52:22 PM
lol...thaz funny  ;D

It's probably something like this guy used: http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=55200.msg856082#msg856082
wow! what does he screw? sewers?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: marcie999 on March 09, 2006, 10:44:27 PM
That is so retarded. His veins look horrible, and what will happen to him if that muck starts travelling around his body?

bleuurrghh!!

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Powerlift66 on March 10, 2006, 02:55:14 AM
LOL

OMG what a total ass cown.. Once he gets his arms amputated he'll have to resort using his feet to cuff his own dummy!


(http://www.exclassics.com/arist/arist7.jpg)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Jav on March 10, 2006, 02:57:24 AM
omg...I'm speachless


speachless? kinda makes me feel a bit sick looking at that,
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Wombat on March 10, 2006, 03:38:16 AM

There are different kinds of implants. The more massive they are they more they look "Soggy",as you can see from that picture of that woman I posted with those breast implants.

stop posting bogus comments...These guys along with Valentino don't have implants...I don't know what it is about you and the word implant...You can inject straight silicone into anything...Guys do it down in TJ and stick it right into their cocks...Some guy has a cock the size of this guys arm...Guess what its not an implant...Now some synthol has collegan in it..Collegan last several months.. i would bet the house that what this idiot did was inject any type of synthol he could get his hands on...My guess is he doesn't have a pot to piss in so implants for what ever reason you like to throw around would not be an option...Straight synthol WILL HARDEN UP IF YOU DON'T MASSAGE IT IN ...And then what happens is you get big lumps in your arms that are not going to go away...This douch bag has them in his arms and he doesn't even know it...Do you realize how much oil these fools are putting in them...So much so that it has nowhere to go...thats what is going on....You could see 35 or 40 inch arms on some fool if he could handle the pain...the skin is made to stretch to like rubber band...This guys arm will probably have to either be amputed because of gang green setting in or like Greg V...numerous operations will have to be performed to take a cysts...

Even if what you say is remotely true...That synthol last a few weeks...what makes you think that this f cking wad isn't staying ahead of the game and injected more in everyday then is coming out...

These are not implants period...This is probably not even silicone(silicone is expensive) but is just cheap oil...
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: gtbro1 on March 10, 2006, 03:56:02 AM
His arms look infected....they got that red warm look to them...know what I mean?...What is pitifull is that in his mind...he actually thinks they look good...sad but true...just look at the smirk on his face in the pic with him flexing his arm...lmfao...what a turd.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Rome on March 10, 2006, 04:22:10 AM
nice....
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: meatmonkey on March 10, 2006, 04:45:01 AM


I know several people who have used Synthol in the past. It's injected into the heads of the muscles to cause oil to enter the muscle and then after a few weeks it naturally dissipates. Once it dissipates there is a room left over where the synthol used to be,REAL muscle can be grown there. The temporary hollow area is a highly anabolic environment which causes the muscle to naturally "fill out" and fill the area that the oil used to be. New muscle fibers form to fill the area within a few weeks and then you have actuall real muscle replacing it.

This guy has IMPLANTS. There is NO WAY this can be caused by simple synthol injections. I won't repeat myself again...OIL DISSIPATES. Any sort of liquid injected into the muscles or which forms in the muscles dissipates. Anyone who's ever injected testosterone into therself knows that it dissipates.



That is the absolute dumbest shit i have ever heard...You CANNOT grow new muscle fibers.  Ronnie coleman has the same number of muscle fibers as he did when he was 12.  You can only make them grow in size, you cant add more muscle fibers.  Sorry, but you are an idiot
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: jaejonna on March 10, 2006, 04:58:43 AM
I wish we can put all the people with synthol to sleep, they are obviously not well in the head and will probably continure to destroy themselves in a cloud of denial.Put them out of thier misery they dont deserve to live like this..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 10, 2006, 05:38:44 AM
Not a bad idea, they're a waste of air.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: HICKSON on March 10, 2006, 06:14:41 AM


That is the absolute dumbest shit i have ever heard...You CANNOT grow new muscle fibers.  Ronnie coleman has the same number of muscle fibers as he did when he was 12.  You can only make them grow in size, you cant add more muscle fibers.  Sorry, but you are an idiot

Amen Brotha!!  ;)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 06:47:05 AM


That is the absolute dumbest shit i have ever heard...You CANNOT grow new muscle fibers.  Ronnie coleman has the same number of muscle fibers as he did when he was 12.  You can only make them grow in size, you cant add more muscle fibers.  Sorry, but you are an idiot


Do some research. Dissipation of synthol causes hyperplasia.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 06:48:07 AM

Because guys like Klaus Dornig,Valentino and this guy DO NOT USE SYNTHOL. What they have are silicone implants. THAT is why they use tiny weights,Because it's not real muscle but implants.


Try to follow along and learn to read.

I read pretty well and know a teeny, tiny bit about anatomy and physiology. There's a much better excuse for those guys being weaker than my ten year old. Obviously the synthol either damages the muscle's ability to contract or the constant stretching of the fascia/fibers lengthens the muscle and permanently weakens it.

The constant stretch would cause some creep in the muscles and ligaments. Just like a rubber band loses some elasticity after being under stretch for too long.

Obviously, we're not talking about the other health risks involved.

The implants argument doesn't explain their weakness. A typical guy should be able to curl around 80-100 pounds without a lot of difficulty. Those guys never move crap and probably have decreased range of motion due to either oil or implants. There should still be some muscle under the implants. Women who get implants can still bench press.  
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 10, 2006, 06:53:28 AM
In no way is placing something unnatural into the muscles beneficial! It's not growing muscle!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 06:53:44 AM
I read pretty well and know a teeny, tiny bit about anatomy and physiology. There's a much better excuse for those guys being weaker than my ten year old. Obviously the synthol either damages the muscle's ability to contract or the constant stretching of the fascia/fibers lengthens the muscle and permanently weakens it.

The constant stretch would cause some creep in the muscles and ligaments. Just like a rubber band loses some elasticity after being under stretch for too long.

Obviously, we're not talking about the other health risks involved.

The implants argument doesn't explain their weakness. A typical guy should be able to curl around 80-100 pounds without a lot of difficulty. Those guys never move crap and probably have decreased range of motion due to either oil or implants. There should still be some muscle under the implants. Women who get implants can still bench press.  


A typical person can't curl 80-100lbs actually. Most people I know who don't work out have trouble curling 20lb dumbells. 100lbs..HAHA.

My brother has never worked out in his life and he's a normal sized person and he can hardly curl 20lb dumbells.

You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 06:54:35 AM
In no way is placing something unnatural into the muscles beneficial! It's not growing muscle!


Ask any person who has ACTUALLY used synthol and they will tell you it does. Not someone with implants like this guy.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 10, 2006, 07:27:40 AM
E-Z GRO INSTRUCTIONS:

1/ Create incision
2/ Pour synthol or grease via funnel
3/ Stitch, then glue w/ bike inner tube patch
4/ *WATCH MUSCLES GRO*! :D

"From the people who brought you Chia Pet!"

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 07:41:02 AM

A typical person can't curl 80-100lbs actually. Most people I know who don't work out have trouble curling 20lb dumbells. 100lbs..HAHA.

My brother has never worked out in his life and he's a normal sized person and he can hardly curl 20lb dumbells.

You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.

I'll give you credit for being a good gimmick account but will play along, LOL!

Then your brother is weak. I see teenage girls barbell curling 40 or so pounds in the gym all the time and don't know many natural guys who can't curl 80-100 pounds without too much difficulty.

If synthol caused organized hyperplasia, guys who injected would get stronger. More fibers = more contraction.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: HICKSON on March 10, 2006, 07:48:52 AM

A typical person can't curl 80-100lbs actually. Most people I know who don't work out have trouble curling 20lb dumbells. 100lbs..HAHA.

My brother has never worked out in his life and he's a normal sized person and he can hardly curl 20lb dumbells.

You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.

You sir have just sealed your..... Aww fuck why do i bother.....

Do you have a drivers licenses?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 08:03:15 AM
You sir have just sealed your..... Aww f**k why do i bother.....

Do you have a drivers licenses?

I tried to let that one go, LOL!

You, on the other hand, couldn't resist. :)

Maybe he got hyperplasia and hypertrophy confused as well.....
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 08:29:35 AM
I'll give you credit for being a good gimmick account but will play along, LOL!

Then your brother is weak. I see teenage girls barbell curling 40 or so pounds in the gym all the time and don't know many natural guys who can't curl 80-100 pounds without too much difficulty.

If synthol caused organized hyperplasia, guys who injected would get stronger. More fibers = more contraction.


Girls curling 40lbs...Haha.

I've worked at a gym for 4 years and less than 10% of people who are first time weight lifters can curl 40lb dumbells I would estimate.

NO ONE in my family or whom I know personally has ever curled 40lb dumbells without lifting in the past. NO ONE.

I've been lifting for 10 years and I can only curl 60lb dumbells a few times. That's 60 in each hand.

You're full of shit if you say people can curl 100lbs without ever lifting in their life.


Also That IS what synthol does.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 08:30:50 AM
You sir have just sealed your..... Aww f**k why do i bother.....

Do you have a drivers licenses?


You can't debate me so you copout with "Aww why do I bother" and other B.S.

Either refute my point or...

SHUT THE f**k UP


Breast implants are done outside of the muscle in the fatty area of the breast. This is common knowledge. If you don't know that,You're a fool.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 08:40:04 AM
Girls curling 40lbs...Haha.

I've worked at a gym for 4 years and less than 10% of people who are first time weight lifters can curl 40lb dumbells I would estimate.

NO ONE in my family or whom I know personally has ever curled 40lb dumbells without lifting in the past. NO ONE.

I've been lifting for 10 years and I can only curl 60lb dumbells a few times. That's 60 in each hand.

You're full of shit if you say people can curl 100lbs without ever lifting in their life.


Also That IS what synthol does.

You're funny!

After criticizing my reading skills it ironic that you didn't appreciate that I wrote barbell curls. A barbell curl of 80-100 lbs is easy for most men. As far as 60lb dumbell curls, a guy with all that synthol induced "hyperplasia" you've mentioned should be able to curl the world, LOL!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 08:45:06 AM
You're funny!

After criticizing my reading skills it ironic that you didn't appreciate that I wrote barbell curls. A barbell curl of 80-100 lbs is easy for most men. As far as 60lb dumbell curls, a guy with all that synthol induced "hyperplasia" you've mentioned should be able to curl the world, LOL!


1.Regardless,No one I know who has never lifted weights can curl 100lb barbells..Let alone EASLY.

2.None of the guys with these mishapen arms have used synthol. Synthol is frequently used by Strongmen & Powerlifters because it adds muscle.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 09:10:43 AM

1.Regardless,No one I know who has never lifted weights can curl 100lb barbells..Let alone EASLY.

2.None of the guys with these mishapen arms have used synthol. Synthol is frequently used by Strongmen & Powerlifters because it adds muscle.

It's impossible for synthol to add muscle.

Let's step into a fantasy world for a moment. In that crazy fantasy world, I'm a doctor and teach A&P. In that world, nothing supports your theory that synthol adds muscle. It's total nonsense. Hypertrophy occurs (in that world) because the pumps are from increased blood volume in the individial muscle cells. 

Back to the real world... If synthol did add muscle, those guys would be stronger. What special kind of nitwit would want non-functional muscle?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: hillbilly on March 10, 2006, 09:14:57 AM
synthol takes about 2 years to be absorbed and is then broken down like any other triglyceride
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 09:15:22 AM
It's impossible for synthol to add muscle.

Let's step into a fantasy world for a moment. In that crazy fantasy world, I'm a doctor and teach A&P. In that world, nothing supports your theory that synthol adds muscle. It's total nonsense. Hypertrophy occurs (in that world) because the pumps are from increased blood volume in the individial muscle cells. 

Back to the real world... If synthol did add muscle, those guys would be stronger. What special kind of nitwit would want non-functional muscle?


What the fuck are you talking about? You aren't making sense.

WHAT GUYS would be stronger? WHO? Valentino? Why would he be stronger if synthol makes you stronger WHEN HE DOESN'T DO SYNTHOL?? Explain that.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 09:16:10 AM
synthol takes about 2 years to be absorbed and is then broken down like any other triglyceride


Is that why when guys who inject it, It dissipates within a few weeks?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: hillbilly on March 10, 2006, 09:20:01 AM

Is that why when guys who inject it, It dissipates within a few weeks?

sorry i was wrong its 5 years

    



Main >> Articles >> Contest >> Calf Implants And Synthol: Learn The Truth!
   

Learn the TRUTH about calf implants and Synthol. Are these ethical? Pictures are online!

Calf Implants And Synthol: Learn The Truth!

By: Ron Harris

The scene was the 1999 NPC California Championships in Redondo Beach, prejudging. Shouts of encouragement, "stay tight!" and "legs!" rang our from the darkness up to the stage, bathed in almost blinding bright light as glistening light-heavyweights kept entire bodies tense under the scrutiny of the judges. In a lineup of nearly thirty top-notch Golden State physiques, one man stood out from the rest, garnering the majority of the spectators' attention as they pointed and whispered about him. It wasn't because he was in contention for first place. In fact, he was unofficially disqualified the moment he strode out from the theater's wings. This sorry bastard, in hopes of becoming Mr. California like Flex Wheeler, Chris Cormier, Dennis Newman and many others before who went on to stardom, had injected what appeared to be gallons of the infamous Synthol into his delts, arms, calves, and traps. Oddly shaped but gigantic arms that would rival any pro led down to spindly forearms that were no bigger than the average guy in the gym. Delts that looked like they were stolen from Paul Dillett tied into average-sized lats and pecs. The oil-inflated muscle groups were so shiny and round that they would look out of place on any human body. "Skeeter bites!" the guy sitting next to me shouted. "Looks like he got attacked by some giant mosquitos!" he brayed. Laughs and jeers echoed in the air at his ridiculous appearance. He had hoped his ruse would be successful, but he ended up being nothing more than a silly joke, comic relief at a serious athletic competition.

Scenarios like the one above are becoming more common every month. Our unfortunate would-be Mr. California is much like many thousands of frustrated lifters out there who refuse to settle for what their genetics limited them to in terms of muscular development. Of course, steroid use in and of itself is the most widespread expression of this dissatisfaction and rebellion. For decades now, men and women all around the globe have taken pills and injections that allowed them to far surpass the degrees of size and strength they would have been capable of naturally. We have witnessed entire generations of bodybuilders swell up to mammoth proportions thanks to steroids. Just ten years ago, anyone over 220 pounds was considered a giant. Now, to earn the same classification, one must tip the scales closer to 300 pounds!

Surely the chemical array of steroids, growth hormone, IGF-1, and insulin have provided bodybuilders with all the tools needed to achieve the bodies of their dreams and at last be satisfied? Sadly, the answer is no. Bodybuilders are perfectionists, determined to keep building until every muscle group meets their approval. Even with steroids, however, nearly everyone has one or more bodyparts that simply don't respond very well. Until a few years ago, that was just the way the cookie crumbled. Many bodybuilders were stuck with wimpy 14-inch calves, though they may have had 30-inch thighs. Others were consigned to undersize 17-inch arms on a 240-pound frame, despite massive chests, lats, and delts. It's as if these stubborn parts got left behind while everything else continued to grow and grow. In the new millenium, these once doomed individuals have two powerful new weapons with which to 'complete' their lacking physiques - calf implants and Synthol.

Calf Implants

Calf implants are actually not very new. Like breast implants, the procedure is several decades old. Bodybuilders make up a large percentage of calf implant patients, as this muscle is notoriously hard to develop with inferior genetics. Black athletes in particular seem to have an especially arduous time building up the calves, due to higher muscle insertions. Nearly everyone with great calves is gifted with very low insertions, close to the ankle, meaning that there are many more muscle fibers capable of growing. With higher insertions, nearer to the knee joint, there are just not many muscle cells in the first place. It is almost unheard of for someone with terrible, 'high' calves to ever build them up to impressive proportions. Just a couple years ago, prior to the Mr. Olympia contest, Shawn Ray challenged IFBB head honcho Wayne DeMilia to investigate Flex Wheeler for calf implants, as his calves had dramatically improved over the past two years from mediocre to excellent. An MRI showed that whatever Flex had done to his calves, it wasn't implants. Arnold Schwarzenegger is another famous bodybuilder that has been accused of having them, though almost everyone knows the legend of how Arnold only started truly training his calves correctly after visiting Reg Park in South Africa. Arnold returned to Venice Beach and cut all of his workout sweats into knickers so that he was constantly reminded of his poor calves. If Arnold did have implants put in, they were certainly superior in appearance to nearly all the calf implants we see today.

To be sure, there are indeed many bodybuilders today who have opted for calf implants after giving up on bringing their actual calves up to par. Typically, implants are a cinch to spot. Most calf implants have a look to them that singles them out as artificial. Either they are too big for the rest of the leg, too round, they stick out to the sides too much, or they constantly look flexed, even when the owner is standing with both feet flat on the ground. One guy at my old gym got calf implants that were believable in size, but the shape was as if a raquetball had been shoved under his real calves. Once in a while, in an effort to 'throw us off the trail,' he would do a few sets of calf raises. In his case, nobody bought them as genuine. Of course, when expert surgeons with a great deal of experience perform the surgery (for those willing to pay for quality), the results are usually much more natural-looking.

The Calf Implant Procedure

Calf implant surgery is an ambulatory, or outpatient, procedure. This means that you go home when it's finished. The implants themselves come in varying sizes and are made of a solid but pliable inert material. The most common brand name used is Silastic. There is always an initial consultation wherein the doctor determines what an appropriate size would be for the individual, based on their overall size and proportions. The goal is always for the implants to look as if they actually belong in that particular body. Just as 100-pound strippers with 36 DDD breast implants look ridiculous, so would a 150-pound man with a runner's build look bizarre sporting 20-inch calves. Anesthesia can be either sedation or full general anesthesia. A small incision is made in the crease behind each knee, and a pocket is formed beneath the muscle fascia. What happens next depends on whether the degree of enlargement is average or excessive. If it is a standard procedure, with average-sized implants, two implants are placed in each leg over the heads of the gastrocnemius. If a large degree of enlargement is desired, as is often the case with massive 220-pound plus bodybuilders wishing for calves that match their physiques, tissue expanders are inserted. These are balloon-like devices that can be gradually increased in size over several weeks. This enables the tissue to slowly stretch to a size that would not be possible all at once. Once the desired size is achieved, the expanders are removed and replaced by the actual implants. The average price for calf implant procedure is about $5,500. Unless you lost your calf muscle in an accident, the surgery is considered elective and not covered by medical insurance.

Recovery And Risks

There is, as you would expect, significant pain following the operation until the body adjusts to the pressure of the implants inside the lower leg. Bed rest is advised for the first few days, with walking being introduced very gradually afterward. During the adjustment stage, walking on top-toes or in high heels is most comfortable. (Just try to find a pair of nice pumps in a men's size 12, though. Lotsa luck!) You can return to training the upper body in a week, and start working the legs again lightly in three weeks. By six weeks, you should be easing back into full-bore heavy training for the legs. As in all surgical procedures, infection is a possibility. Other possible complications from calf implants include shifting of the implants, bruising, and rarely, muscle weakness. The majority of complications arise when patients resume activity levels too soon, before the implant is solidly healed in place. Bodybuilders are especially prone to do this, as most are paranoid about missing any amount of training. Keep in mind that nearly all bodybuilding federations ban calf implants, so only non-competitors should consider filling out their gastrocs artificially.

Synthol

Origins And Meteoric Rise

The genesis of Synthol was an Italian steroid called Esiclene that was quite popular in the 1980's. For those unfamiliar with Esiclene, it was not used for lasting mass gains but instead immediately before a contest as a quick fix for visually weak body parts. Acting primarily as a muscle inflammatory agent, competitors injected it directly into the calves, arms, or shoulders for a bit of extra size and fullness in whichever of these smaller muscle groups were lagging. The effect was fleeting, but the drug served its purpose. In the early 90's, a German named Chris Clark began to tinker with the idea of an injectable substance that would yield more lasting gains in size. He came up with a formulation initially named Synthol, which he later learned was already a registered and trademarked pharmaceutical name. Clark quickly renamed his product Pump N' Pose, but the first name stuck. Now, the word Synthol is as much a part of the hardcore bodybuilding lexicon as Dianabol or Deca. Clark hit upon a gold mine, as there were thousands of steroid-using bodybuilders who were dissatisfied with the size of their arms, delts, and calves. Let's face it, few have the genetics to build an upper arm of twenty inches or more in lean condition, even with a boatload of anabolics and the most brutal training regimens imaginable.

One of its first users was a German strongman who billed himself as having "the world's largest arms" at 27 inches. Now, though the effect is quite obvious, as the Synthol-enhanced muscles take on shapes never found on any actual human being, you can go to any contest or large fitness expo and see several men who have injected enough oil into their bi's and tri's to satisfy their most extreme desires. Gains of two inches or more in the arms alone are quite commonplace. Synthol is also commonly used in the side delts and calves, as was Esiclene. Ironically, it is available legally, since the $400 bottles are labeled as posing oil. You sure could buy a lot of baby oil with 400 smackeroos! Despite the high price tag, its makers have found it difficult at times to keep up the worldwide demand from bodybuilders.

What Is Synthol?

Synthol is composed of 85% medium-chain triglyceride oils (a fatty acid), 7.5% lidocaine (painkiller), and 7.5 5 benzyl alcohol. The preparation is injected deep into the muscle where it is encapsulated between the fascicles (bundles of muscle fibers) . With repeated injections, a larger volume of oil builds up inside the muscle, expanding its size like a balloon filling up with air. About 30% of what is injected is metabolized by the body. The other 70% remains lodged in the muscle where it breaks down very slowly over three to five years. There seems to be some issue of debate among bodybuilders as to whether or not Synthol actually lasts this long, and some believe it is even longer. Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible. Synthol users report amazing pumps while training, though this could be a result of the extra pressure of the accumulated oil.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: hillbilly on March 10, 2006, 09:21:16 AM
whoop i think i highlight all!!!!! its the last bit
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 09:49:18 AM
"Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible."

OJ will find the real killers before this guy discovers a way synthol causes muscle growth. :)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 10, 2006, 09:52:01 AM
Quote
"Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible."

That SETTLES IT, it's 100% effective!  ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 10:10:41 AM
That SETTLES IT, it's 100% effective!  ::)

I'm convinced! :)

Why was I so stubborn before?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 10, 2006, 10:42:21 AM
Serious question for women only: Could & should synthol be used in boobs?  :-X
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 10, 2006, 11:04:48 AM
It'll make your johnson bar grow too, LOL!

It stretched the corpus cavernousum and spongium after it dissipates there's more room for blood flow during erections. :)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Unchained81 on March 10, 2006, 05:07:31 PM
Just for the synthol/implant debate- isn't that the same guy in the pic in the other synthol thread with the mohawk?  If so, his arms are definately "bigger" in these pics.  This would make one think that he simply injected more oil to get them "bigger."  It makes it doubtful to me that they are implants.  Could be, just seems more logical that it would be oil.  I am not an expert on either, just some food for thought.  Either way, any bets on this guy living to 40?  Debate.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: FREAKgeek on March 10, 2006, 06:17:14 PM
Quote
Chris Clark, its inventor, is convinced that it somehow leads to permanent muscle growth in the effected areas, though even he is unsure of the mechanisms that would make this possible.

I would think only scar tissue develops, like that of a major laceration.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: meatmonkey on March 10, 2006, 07:30:07 PM
I would think only scar tissue develops, like that of a major laceration.

Yes this is all that CAN happen...if you were to tear a muscle, the muscle doesnt grow back new fibers, it reattches with scar tissue (post surgery).  Johnny Apollo is an absolute idiot.  Injecting your muscles with synthol would only create a space in between fibers destroying the muscle.  It would either heal when the oil dissapates or fill in with scar tissue.  Apollo, please dont tell me to do research, I am a physical therapist, a musculoskelatal expert.  so please shut the fuck up.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 09:06:57 PM
Yes this is all that CAN happen...if you were to tear a muscle, the muscle doesnt grow back new fibers, it reattches with scar tissue (post surgery).  Johnny Apollo is an absolute idiot.  Injecting your muscles with synthol would only create a space in between fibers destroying the muscle.  It would either heal when the oil dissapates or fill in with scar tissue.  Apollo, please dont tell me to do research, I am a physical therapist, a musculoskelatal expert.  so please shut the f**k up.



It's funny how everyone tries to post up their supposed credentails and history but none of them know what the fuck they are talking about.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: gtbro1 on March 11, 2006, 04:13:38 AM
Girls curling 40lbs...Haha.

I've worked at a gym for 4 years and less than 10% of people who are first time weight lifters can curl 40lb dumbells I would estimate.

NO ONE in my family or whom I know personally has ever curled 40lb dumbells without lifting in the past. NO ONE.

I've been lifting for 10 years and I can only curl 60lb dumbells a few times. That's 60 in each hand.

You're full of shit if you say people can curl 100lbs without ever lifting in their life.


Also That IS what synthol does.

Well sir...if you have been lifting for TEN YEARS ,and lifting steady.....and can only do a few curls with a 60 pound dumbell...then  either you were pitifully weak when you started,or you have obviously not been doing something right..whether it be diet or intensity of workouts or just bad form...or all of the above.So given that scenario...why would anyone think that you would know what you were talking about in regards to weight training and/ or muscle?..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 11, 2006, 06:27:31 PM
I honestly don't know who is the stupidest idiot on this thread

 The guy with tumor arms or the idiot trying to suggest a certified MD willingly opened up his arms and just shoved massive implants down there?

What fucking planet do some of you people live on?

 Do you not realise this guy is sick in the head? it doesn't matter if the oil disappears after 3 days!! These guys are compulsive basket cases who inject massive amounts every single fucking day!! Do you not get it you stupid cretin,they are ALWAYS putting more and more oil into their arms and that's why they are getting more and more painfully swollen looking and the skin looks infected.

 Jesus Christ,it's simple math..even if he loses x amount in three weeks he still has more and more going in there until it levels out and he 'maintains' . Like if you're in a sinking boat and it's filling up with water (liquid,you following?) you might bail some out but there is still too much coming in to prevent it sinking.

Thanks for the laugh,the thought of a certified Plastic surgeon harming people in this way gave me a fantastic laugh.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: FREAKgeek on March 11, 2006, 06:54:09 PM
I think chris-hofer.com is the wrong web site
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Lion666 on March 11, 2006, 09:25:23 PM
wanna talk about that body dysmorphia.  remember the bigorexia thread, seein the guy on there, they made it like he was really out there, "his obession"  thats the minimum to anyone on this board.  the funny part is they think it  looks good.  yeah your arms r bigger than coleman is that all its about.  they dont look muscular even off season muscular.  muscles r sought after because they r powerful even a fat muscular beafy guy., his arms have the certain look or even "air" to them.  although they carry more fat than bbr theres thick muscle under, and that cant be faked.  our bodies r made with liquid we use liquid, no diff making a baloon larger by addin air, and any one can do that!
along with those big arms commanding power, they also command respect.  the respect that we all hold together, we out there every day gettin em along with the chest shldrs etc. whatevr.  dont they know they dont get none of that.
from the web yahoo link qoute

This group is for people who use or are planning to use synthol (site injections and/or SEO's in general) to increase their muscle mass. Here we will discuss it's use, how it works and share ideas and experiences.

Here we will post images of people who use/abuse synthol. The idea is to learn as much as possible to become as HUGE as possible while at the same time looking as good as possible. The images also have include people who are considered "messed up".


being big looks good, and for a reason.  how they think that what they doin to themselves looks good.  yeah u could say the same about reg bbr even with juice use, wantin to getbig and lookin diff.  show a pic of coleman or any pro most people say "ow thats too big wateva blah.  but show that same pic along with any those knuckleheadz makes the pros seem somewhat normal.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Lion666 on March 11, 2006, 09:49:22 PM
http://www.chris-hofer.com/foto/db/thumbnails.php?album=19

hes strong just like any other guy with big arms.  they play it like yeah cause he has "big bis" hes a strong man.  how anyone can....  gregg does not belong in that class, he is the one that gave them the idea.  gregg was a bbr  before he did his arms so... they carry a whole diff look also, somewhat still hard muscular look.  yeah his arms are bad but compred to those dopes c'mon, n-e-c!  they arms r soft when they do that right cause it dont look at all diff when flexd, no tone change at all.  again, at least gv is diff.
its like yah tough guy wit big swole infected pussy inflamation ridden black blu purple arms, keep up the good work knucklehead  ;D ::) ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Lion666 on March 11, 2006, 09:54:49 PM
 :o if i lifts weights and juice can i look like that someday??? ;)  please!!!!! :D

  ::) ;D ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 11, 2006, 10:35:42 PM
Quote
gregg does not belong in that class, he is the one that gave them the idea.  gregg was a bbr  before he did his arms so... they carry a whole diff look also, somewhat still hard muscular look

So to clarify....GV's "old-school" synthol? ???

Are we into second and third-generation? ::)

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 11, 2006, 11:53:11 PM
If you think that OIL can build up to a giant beak like that in Valentino's biceps you're a fool. If it were that much oil it would disperse throughout the rest of his arm opposed to forming a big giant peak like that.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Lion666 on March 11, 2006, 11:54:59 PM
you can call me bias, greggs a cool guy, but beyond that at least he lifted and was a bbr and paid his gym dues.  the guy in that link looks like he never paid any.  they in the same ballpark just not the same league.  not disputing the fact of whos doin oil or implants but the fact of the "deformation" if you will, of the upper arms.  either way 6 of one half dozen of another.  oil, implants whatever, the results of both make steroids look like protein powder.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 12, 2006, 12:06:29 AM
Valentino is a scumbag because he attributes to the bad reputation Steroids get in the Media. On that Documentary he attributed Anabolic Steroids to his Arms..HAHA.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 12, 2006, 03:25:52 AM
Valentino is a scumbag because he attributes to the bad reputation Steroids get in the Media. On that Documentary he attributed Anabolic Steroids to his Arms..HAHA.

 You really aren't in a position to laugh at anyone for appearing stupid.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: hillbilly on March 12, 2006, 05:18:41 AM
You really aren't in a position to laugh at anyone for appearing stupid.

LMAO!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: oldtimer1 on March 12, 2006, 06:34:42 AM
Some of that oil dissipates.  The rest just stays because it clogs up the veins.  Imagine what that junk does to your body circulating in your system.  You can see the injection sites on his arms.  They have to use large gauge needles because the oil is so thick.  Can you say ouch!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: bic_staedtler on March 12, 2006, 08:46:21 AM
....jesus, this is a retarded thread on a retarded topic.

But what's the most retarded thing I've read?

That "synthol leaves a hole behind after it's dissipated and that hole can now be 'filled' with new muscle tissue"....and the only backup for anybody trying to dispute it being..."do your research".

Well.

...so dumb it doesn't even warrant a response.  Since I didn't make the retarded statement that Synthol indirectly causes MUSCLE GROWTH, I don't have to back up jack shit.  Let's let the fool (who knows who he is) 'stun' us with this 'research' that PROVES his obviously ridiculous theory.

...utterly ridiculous. 
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: drkaje on March 12, 2006, 11:34:45 AM


It's funny how everyone tries to post up their supposed credentails and history but none of them know what the f**k they are talking about.

Then please educate us as to the exact mechanism by which synthol creates an anabolic environment or contributes to muscle growth.

That's a pretty simple question for an expert such as yourself.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Special Ed on March 12, 2006, 09:31:48 PM
I saw Valentino in the mall one day and I nearly threw up. The last time I saw something that purple was when I tied a rubber band around my cock and balls.

Special "Asexual Reproducer" Ed
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 12, 2006, 09:41:54 PM
Thanx for the visual.  :D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: onlyme on March 12, 2006, 11:56:04 PM
I love the matching tattoos.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: shutupandtrain88 on March 13, 2006, 02:42:40 PM
hey apollo i put some sythnol in my pit bull to make it more muscular but not it just looks like Valentino,,,how soon before the anabolic action takes place and i have a bigger badass dog??????
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 04:25:55 PM
Well sir...if you have been lifting for TEN YEARS ,and lifting steady.....and can only do a few curls with a 60 pound dumbell...then  either you were pitifully weak when you started,or you have obviously not been doing something right..whether it be diet or intensity of workouts or just bad form...or all of the above.So given that scenario...why would anyone think that you would know what you were talking about in regards to weight training and/ or muscle?..

It's obvious to me you don't spend any time lifting weights. No one saying things as stupid and absurd as you could possibly of ever lifted weights in their life.

Claiming people who have never even lifted weights in their life are as strong as you're claiming is absurd.


Here are some averages for the Adult American male...

Quote
Average Height-5'9 1/2

Average Weight-175lbs

Age when the average guy is in the best shape of his life: 23
Percentage of men who consider themselves "physically fit": 69
Percentage who actually are: 13
Time it takes the average guy to run a mile: 8 minutes, 34 seconds
Amount he can bench-press: 135 pounds
Number of situps he can do: 36
Pushups: 27
Pullups: 1
Percentage of men who would never skip another workout if... ...they could build twice the muscle with half the effort: 40
...women began wearing see-through spandex: 16
Size of the average guy's biceps: 13 inches
Size of his chest: 40 inches
Size of his waist: 34 inches
The part of a man's body that's the biggest turn-on for the average woman: His butt
The part the average guy spends the most time trying to develop: His chest
Time period when the typical gym is least crowded: 10 am to 11:30am
Percentage of men who don't belong in a gym: 88
Exercise equipment the average guy is most likely to own: Dumbbells
Number of men who have used their stationary bike in the past week: 1 in 3
Number who haven't hopped on the thing in at least 3 months: 1 in 6
Percentage of men who use their fitness equipment as... ...a place to hang their clothes: 45
...a doorstop: 13
...a weapon: 8
Amount of muscle the average sedentary guy loses each year: 1 pound
Fat he gains each year: 1.1 pounds
Resting heart rate of a fit man: 52 beats per minute (BPM)
Resting heart rate of a man who's out of shape: 72 BPM
Time it takes a fit man to log 8,000,000 heartbeats: 30 years
Time it takes an out-of-shape man: 19 years
Amount the average 40-year-old man would save each year in medical costs if he exercised regularly: $949 Average cost of a 1-year gym membership: $648
His net profit: $301
Number of men who would rather work out than have sex: 1 in 7
Percentage of men (and women) who think that gyms are pickup joints: 14


http://www.pipeline.com/~dada3zen/average.htm

Quote
AVERAGE MAN (spectrum) :
height = 5'8 - 5'10

weight = 160 - 180 lbs.
bench press (max) = 135 - 185 lbs.
deadlift (max) = 185 - 235 lbs.
squat (max) = 185 - 235 lbs.
bicep curl (max double) = 60 - 100 lbs.
bicep curl (max single) = 30 - 50 lbs.



The average man with the average amount of exercise an average american gets who is the average height and average weight can benchpress 135-185lbs for 1 Rep Max.
The average amount he can curl on a barbell is 60-100lbs.(Below what you stated)
The average amount he can curl on a dumbell is 30-50lbs.(Below what you stated)

An Adult male at his physical peak who spends the average amount of time exercising who is 5'10" and 180lbs(Upper levels of average) can only curl a 100lb barbell 1 time.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 04:31:10 PM
You really aren't in a position to laugh at anyone for appearing stupid.


I never laughed at anyone for "appearing stupid". I laughed at him for BEING stupid.

You don't even have the basic reading comprehension to grasp that and you're insulting me? WoW.


Maybe I do "Appear" stupid to people of miniscule intelligence such as yours. After all even the greatest had their critiques. Beethoven, Einstein, Franklin, Edison.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: rocket on March 13, 2006, 04:56:40 PM
You can't use averages to isolate whether there are people stronger than you without lifting weights.  I wouldn't find many, if any australians who could lift more without training but these islander guys who live here too (samoans and what not) are often huge and above average strength by default.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 05:02:09 PM
You can't use averages to isolate whether there are people stronger than you without lifting weights.  I wouldn't find many, if any australians who could lift more without training but these islander guys who live here too (samoans and what not) are often huge and above average strength by default.



That made absolutely no sense.


The "Average" is done by country. The weights and heights I posted are the "Average" for adult males living in America who enguage in the average amount of exercise.

I never used averages to say people aren't stronger than me without lifting weights. I used the averages to show averages. People were claiming that MOST people who don't even work out can curl 100lbs easly. I refuted that showing that most people who DO workout can only do it for 1 rep max.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 13, 2006, 05:10:09 PM
I see that you are an Internet attention whore Apollo..no such thing as  bad publicity eh..as long as you get a bunch of people talking to you over the net  it compensates for your empty,dull life.

 You've been shown up to be an absolute fool on this thread. Every single person has lampooned your claim that a certified MD opened up that guy's arm and put in giant,potentially life threatening,shapeless implants.

 I've explained to you,even in simple,child's terms how these people,with serious mental problems, inject oil at such a rate that even if the body absorbs some it it makes no difference to the overall amount going into the site - like a fisherman bailing out a sinking boat.

 Instead of acting humble you carry on with your pathetic,unintelligent witterings ..obviously relishing the fact that you are getting some attention for once in your sorry life..this proves one of two things : you either believe that these are implants willingly placed there by Doctors,or,you know what you're saying is bullshit but love the fact you're getting lots of reaction. Either way,you are a fucking asshole :)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 13, 2006, 05:14:07 PM
THIS IS GETTING INTO TOO MUCH MINUTIAE. BOTTOM LINE HE'S DOING CHEAT BB CURLS WITH 100.

WHEN IS THE FIRST MR. SYNTHOL OLYMPIA AND WHO WILL WIN?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 05:17:00 PM
I see that you are an Internet attention whore Apollo..no such thing as  bad publicity eh..as long as you get a bunch of people talking to you over the net  it compensates for your empty,dull life.

When you can't argue against my argument anymore you resort to baseless personal insults? Nice.

You've been shown up to be an absolute fool on this thread. Every single person has lampooned your claim that a certified MD opened up that guy's arm and put in giant,potentially life threatening,shapeless implants.

Making up History I see? No one has shown they aren't implants. Implants are the most logical explanation. Oil dissipates,I've already proven that.


I've explained to you,even in simple,child's terms how these people,with serious mental problems, inject oil at such a rate that even if the body absorbs some it it makes no difference to the overall amount going into the site - like a fisherman bailing out a sinking boat.

If it were oil it wouldn't sit in a giant peak like it does. Oil would spread to other parts of the body,Yet there isn't any in his forearms. Why? 30lbs of oil would surely sink to his forearms but it hasn't.

It's obviously an implant.


Instead of acting humble you carry on with your pathetic,unintelligent witterings ..obviously relishing the fact that you are getting some attention for once in your sorry life..this proves one of two things : you either believe that these are implants willingly placed there by Doctors,or,you know what you're saying is bullshit but love the fact you're getting lots of reaction. Either way,you are a fucking asshole :)

TrueGrit...You obviously haven't even read this entire thread have you? You're so unintelligent you start arguing something you don't have a clue about when you haven't even read the whole thread?

I have already posted that picture of that women with 30lb breasts demonstrating 1.It looks EXACTLY like valentino's biceps.
2.Doctors ARE willing to do just about anything if paid enough.


So stop making yourself look like the pitiful fool you are and don't post in this thread again. Or...You can continue to post and I will continue to make you look like the ignorant fool you are. Either way...I win.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: rocket on March 13, 2006, 05:17:59 PM
Quote
Claiming people who have never even lifted weights in their life are as strong as you're claiming is absurd.

Thats your quote.

And thus my comment referring to the fact that following that statement with averages proves very little makes perfect sense.

Besides, if it made no sense, why were you able to respond to it?  Surely that would have been the end of the post.  Upon elaboration you seem to have fully understood what I said yet you seem unclear as to why I said it.  That should be quite obvious now.

At this point in time I'm not interested in wasting my day getting out my dick to debate anything with you, I'm just pointing out that you make a comment dispelling what would be known as exceptional cases and then you follow it with irrevelant information regarding averages.  You can try to posture as much as you want, I'm just responding to what you said and what you said was incongruent. 
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 13, 2006, 05:36:38 PM
Apollo


But the problem is you have no argument at all. You just say 'they are implants' 'synthol dissipates after three weeks'. That is not an argument,that's akin to a four year old claiming the moon is made of blue cheese. I've explained to you why,scientifically,it makes no difference.

 I happen to know I'm right,I don't care if you want to dwell in ignorance,or pretend to be ignorant.

 And as for telling me where to post,I will post where I want..I certainly wouldn't let some jobless loser tell me what I can say on Getbig :)

 Have fun being the forum clown,have you noticed that everyone is laughing you perchance?  You're doing it very well :) :)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: FREAKgeek on March 13, 2006, 06:21:59 PM

One of its first users was a German strongman who billed himself as having "the world's largest arms" at 27 inches.

Manfred Hoeberl
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 06:32:41 PM
Thats your quote.

And thus my comment referring to the fact that following that statement with averages proves very little makes perfect sense.

Besides, if it made no sense, why were you able to respond to it?  Surely that would have been the end of the post.  Upon elaboration you seem to have fully understood what I said yet you seem unclear as to why I said it.  That should be quite obvious now.

At this point in time I'm not interested in wasting my day getting out my dick to debate anything with you, I'm just pointing out that you make a comment dispelling what would be known as exceptional cases and then you follow it with irrevelant information regarding averages.  You can try to posture as much as you want, I'm just responding to what you said and what you said was incongruent. 



I can respond to something even if it doesn't make sense mind you...Simply by reiterating what I said before since you apparantly didn't understand it.

Secondly, The posting of averages was in response to the claim that "Most people could curl over 100lbs easly" Not that "Some exceptional people can curl 100lbs who haven't lifted before".
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 06:34:40 PM
Apollo


But the problem is you have no argument at all. You just say 'they are implants' 'synthol dissipates after three weeks'. That is not an argument,that's akin to a four year old claiming the moon is made of blue cheese. I've explained to you why,scientifically,it makes no difference.

 I happen to know I'm right,I don't care if you want to dwell in ignorance,or pretend to be ignorant.

 And as for telling me where to post,I will post where I want..I certainly wouldn't let some jobless loser tell me what I can say on Getbig :)

 Have fun being the forum clown,have you noticed that everyone is laughing you perchance?  You're doing it very well :) :)



You haven't explained why "Scientifically it makes no sense" However I have.

Quote
If it were oil it wouldn't sit in a giant peak like it does. Oil would spread to other parts of the body,Yet there isn't any in his forearms. Why? 30lbs of oil would surely sink to his forearms but it hasn't.


I guess you choose to continue to make a fool of yourself and amuse me....

I've got a good idea...Why don't you prove you're a little child even more and throw some more baseless insults at me without ever making a single argument?

That will sure show me! ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: shrugman on March 13, 2006, 06:51:29 PM
what they are doing to their arms is disgusting.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 13, 2006, 07:08:30 PM
The fact is,no-one agrees with you on anything at all. Your spelling and grammar also indicates a low level of education.

  You have proved Oil dissipates? Well,even that is hotly debated by experts (and we are talking real experts,not kids called Apollo on the internet) . However,let's accept it does. In fact, even if it dissipates after three weeks and not the 2-5 years more conservative estimates put it at, what you neglect to address is the fact that these guys do not do a few,minor cycles of oil for aesthetic purposes. They inject large amounts of oils (because it is not just Synthol) on a daily basis with no regard for safety and/or aesthetics. Even if some of the oil disperses enough of it remains to keep accumulating at a growing rate. Imagine that you are in a boat (the muscle) and it springs a leak and water keeps flooding in (the oils) imagine now that you grab a bucket and start bailing water out (the oil dispersing) even if you bail out a  lot of water the rate at which the water is filling the boat is still too great for you to prevent it sinking (the muscle becoming more and more overloaded with oil).

 Now,see if you can answer this in an intelligent and grown up manner and I can at least give you credit for just being very,very misguided and unable to listen to others -believe me,this is better than how you are currently being perceived.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: rocket on March 13, 2006, 07:24:15 PM

I can respond to something even if it doesn't make sense mind you...Simply by reiterating what I said before since you apparantly didn't understand it.

Secondly, The posting of averages was in response to the claim that "Most people could curl over 100lbs easly" Not that "Some exceptional people can curl 100lbs who haven't lifted before".

Oh I'm clear on what you meant but I'm wasn't for one second going to let you throw out what you said initially in that post with no evidence following was I :) 

Something related, I think you'll find if you debate with the general public here you will find the ego boost that you appear to be looking for (and I know this because I have done the same here) but in the end you will realise you cannot change the way people think as easily as you might have hoped if you rely on infering that everybody who disagrees with you are stupid or make no sense.  I know people are throwing insults at you but as the one relying on the facts/science you don't atall need to respond.

I mean do you honestly feel threatened by spelling and grammar comments? :)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 13, 2006, 07:47:37 PM
The fact is,no-one agrees with you on anything at all. Your spelling and grammar also indicates a low level of education.

1.Fallacy. Appeal to populairty.

2.My use spelling and grammar are just fine for a message board of this type...Not that your spelling or grammar is anywhere near perfect..But You apparantly started using spellcheckers the last few posts just to pull out the old "Well i'm right because you don't use perfect grammar on a bodybuilding board" LMAO

You're a joke!

You have proved Oil dissipates? Well,even that is hotly debated by experts (and we are talking real experts,not kids called Apollo on the internet) . However,let's accept it does. In fact, even if it dissipates after three weeks and not the 2-5 years more conservative estimates put it at, what you neglect to address is the fact that these guys do not do a few,minor cycles of oil for aesthetic purposes. They inject large amounts of oils (because it is not just Synthol) on a daily basis with no regard for safety and/or aesthetics.


No "Experts" debate this. The only article that has been posted was by a non-expert.


 
Even if some of the oil disperses enough of it remains to keep accumulating at a growing rate. Imagine that you are in a boat (the muscle) and it springs a leak and water keeps flooding in (the oils) imagine now that you grab a bucket and start bailing water out (the oil dispersing) even if you bail out a  lot of water the rate at which the water is filling the boat is still too great for you to prevent it sinking (the muscle becoming more and more overloaded with oil).

You're contradicting yourself here. First you say assume it all dissipates and then you say it doesn't all dissipate inorder to prove your point. Who's the uneducated one again? ::)


 
Now,see if you can answer this in an intelligent and grown up manner and I can at least give you credit for just being very,very misguided and unable to listen to others -believe me,this is better than how you are currently being perceived.

I've already addressed ALL of your questions. You on the other hand haven't addressed ANY of mine.

1.Why doesn't the 30lbs of oil sink down to his forearms opposed to forming a giant peak on his bicep?

2.Why is it that women with massive silicone implants have the SAME appearance as guys like valentino?

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Lion666 on March 13, 2006, 08:33:29 PM
http://www.pipeline.com/~dada3zen/average.htm

cool link, thanks for postin apollo.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: rocket on March 13, 2006, 10:26:49 PM
Hmm.. well I guess if you want the truth you might try emailing guy grundy to answer some of these questions or milos as both have had experience with synthol and know whether it is plausable.  Particularly this oil going into the forearms qualm.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Hugh G. Reqshun on March 14, 2006, 12:42:43 PM
Ladies, ladies...Enough fussing!

No one has answered MY question about Ernie Taylor's triceps.  Are they oil or implants?

Oil! Every BBer on the British Circuit knows this as fact, but Ernie still claims it's just his genetics!!!

Really Ernie! You think we're all that retarded? Who you trying to fool?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: hardest core on March 14, 2006, 01:06:37 PM
He is obviously mentally ill.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 14, 2006, 01:18:39 PM
Quote
I saw Valentino in the mall one day and I nearly threw up.

If you see him again, throw up on him, for me. Thanks!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 14, 2006, 01:23:53 PM
Apollo - I do not need to use a spellchecker ,but I would urge you to try it sometime.

 You have no idea the amount of dumbing down I have to do to converse with you on a level you can understand :)

 If you had ever bothered to read my posts in any detail,instead of rushing to type your responses, you would understand that the issue I have with you is your ridiculous claim that Plastic surgeons have willingly performed operations to create those arms. It is nothing even remotely connected to performing an implant insertion in the female breast,which is largely comprised of fatty tissue and avoids the nerves,tendons,arteries etc.. of the arm.

 The fact is that these guys do inject liquid silicone - it is a cocktail of synthol,silicone and other agents. If you had listened,you would have understood this. This is well known,men have died doing this - injecting it into their dicks and arms. No plastic surgeon would touch an area so threatening to their career and create walking time bomb freaks,ready to drop dead.



 Everything these guys do,they do to themselves..they do not pay a plastic surgeon to do this to them,they use a combination of liquid silicone and synthol, in different quantities,fact!. Go to any MD,Bodybuilding board and you will find this out.

 You know this is right,just accept it instead of making an idiot of yourself. This is the last time I will explain it to you.If you choose to be ignorant that is your choice but please be aware : you will never be taken seriously again and eventually people will ignore you for being a fool trying to get attention.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: HICKSON on March 14, 2006, 02:19:49 PM

reports that bodybuilders are using two new drugs to build muscle mass locally through site injection. The drugs Artecoll and Silikon 1000 come from the world of dermatology, but bodybuilders are using them for site enhancement to great effect. Both drugs are new and neither have been approved by the FDA. Dermatologists are using them as replacements for collagen injections. Injected subcutaneously, they smooth wrinkles and give the appearance of smoother skin. But unlike collagen which lasts only three months or so, both Artecoll and Silikon are permanent. In the reports that I have received, bodybuilders are using these drugs to build phenomenal biceps, calves, and to shore up other lagging body parts by injecting these substances deep into the belly of the muscle itself where it can make the muscle dramatically bigger.

Bodybuilders are using these drugs in the same way that they used the old site injection oils in the past. In case you're not familiar with using site injection oil to build muscle, here's a quick history...

Chris Clark was the inventor of the original site injection oil, that he marketed under the name Synthol -- it also went by the names Synthrol 877 and Synthrol 873. Clark was a steroid dealer who became obsessed with the idea of developing a product that could make muscle bigger by expanding it locally with oil. One version of his original Synthol contained anabolic steroids, but others just contained Clark's mixture of oils.

Reports have it that during the development of Synthol, Clark injected himself repeatedly with a variety of different oils that he had tried to sterilize in his kitchen. Legend has it that he injected so much oil that he almost died on several occasions from pulmonary embolisms. And he almost lost one of his legs below the knee due to a horrible infection. But, did this stop Chris Clark? Absolutely not!

All the pros and top amateurs began using Synthol and other site enhancement oils. The lucky ones had avoided abscesses. Some had good results whereas others looked like they had small balloons of oil sitting on top of their muscles. Those that had better results usually had gone deeper into the muscle tissue using longer 1.5 inch needles. Going deep into the muscle fiber, they had lifted and spread the muscle from underneath instead of forming a swimming pool of oil on top of the muscle tissue.

With the new drugs Artecoll and Silikon 1000, bodybuilders are hoping to achieve better site specific results and at the same time avoid the sterility issues that came with the bathtub-made site enhancement oils. Here's some information about Artecoll and Silikon 1000.

Artecoll, believe it or not, is actually an injectable implant. Typically it is used for skin augmentation, but bodybuilders are experimenting with it for site enhancement through intramuscular injection. It should be noted that it is not approved for either type of use.

Artecoll is composed of tiny beads called polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) which are suspended in a collagen solution. The manufacturer added lidocaine for the relief of post treatment soreness. The sterility of this product and the lidocaine are already a big improvement over the older oils that often made bodybuilders so sore that they could not train for a week after an injection.
 

The PMMA beads are 32-40 µm in size which is about 4 to 5 times the size of a red blood cell. PMMA has been used since the early 1930's in such common procedures as dental work, eye lenses, bone repair, orthopedics and in pacemakers. These beads are well tolerated by human tissue (no rejection).

Artecoll utilizes the body's natural ability to encapsulate foreign bodies by the formation of connective tissue surrounding the PMMA beads. The process of encapsulation of the beads by the body's own connective tissue (collagen) is complete in about 3 months. Absorption and dislocation of the beads is prevented by the encapsulation of each individual bead with connective tissue. Localized growth reportedly takes place over several months as the body forms its own connective tissue around the beads.

Normally a topical anesthetic such as lidocaine or prilocaine is put on the area to be treated one hour prior to the procedure. When used dermatologically, a series of tiny injections are made under the skin's surface -- bodybuilders are reportedly going deeper and with larger injections. Artecoll has an excellent safety record with less than 0.1% incidence of side effects (mainly allergy and inflammation).

The results are considered permanent; there is no need to continually retreat as with some other procedures. The implant will remain for the rest of the person's life. Possible side effects include swelling, redness, slight bruising and moderate pain after injection. Slight itching at the implantation site is a rather common symptom. These symptoms normally subside in a few days. Since the use of this drug is so new, some doctors speculate that the beads could potentially migrate and form clumps that would have to be removed -- although at present this is just speculation.

Just as controversial as Artecoll, Silikon 1000 is a medical-grade liquid silicone that bodybuilders have begun to experiment with for site enhancement.

The injection of liquid silicone into breast tissue was used in the 1950s and 1960s as a breast augmentation procedure. Owing to side effects such as the formation of hard masses in the breast (silicone granulomas) and possible other side effects, the technique was abandoned. And in 1992, concerns about leaks from the silicone in breast implants resulted in a ban on all cosmetic uses of the substance.
 

Having been banned for a decade, liquid silicone injection is making a quiet comeback. Some dermatologists are now once again offering the new medical grade silicone, Silikon 1000, as a wrinkle smoother to patients wanting to avoid a face lift. And some bodybuilders are also experimenting with it for site enhancement.

Silikon 1000 is a silicone preparation that was approved in 1997 to treat detached retinas. Using it for wrinkles or site enhancement is off label use by physicians.

What makes Silikon 1000 of such interest to dermatologists and bodybuilders alike is also what causes such concern; namely, liquid silicone is permanent. Silicone makes an attractive filler because of its longevity -- once injected, it cannot be removed. Silikon 1000 has recently been approved for testing on facial wrinkles, depressions, and AIDS related facial wasting.

For some, the problems that plagued silicone in the past can be attributed to improper technique or using an adulterated or impure formulation. Even today, in the transgender community, there are still deaths reported not infrequently from "silicone parties" where non-medical grade silicone is injected to enhance the buttocks and breasts. And there are a lot of side effects that you can get from it if it is used incorrectly. Adulterated forms can give you granulomas, which are bumps in the skin. And if silicone is used in too great a volume it can result in migration.

That said, bodybuilders have always and are still experimenting with silicone. (Rumor has it that Arnold used it in his calves decades ago. With the advent of a safer silicone, Silikon 1000, or a stack of Silikon 1000 and Artecol together, we are entering an age of injectable bodybuilding never before seen.

Although it is certainly not recommended that site injection be tried given the experimental nature of these drugs



Well if this "synthol" is a so called muscle builder then it needs to be used in the medical field for post-polio victims, para-pelagic, nerve damaged victims, ect...

you are confusing "building new muscle" to " the body reacting and healing itself from a foreign chemical, ect, which causes bumps, swelling, ect...

QUOTE FROM ABOVE:
Artecoll utilizes the body's natural ability to encapsulate foreign bodies by the formation of connective tissue surrounding the PMMA beads. The process of encapsulation of the beads by the body's own connective tissue (collagen) is complete in about 3 months. Absorption and dislocation of the beads is prevented by the encapsulation of each individual bead with connective tissue. Localized growth reportedly takes place over several months as the body forms its own connective tissue around the beads.

Thats not building new muscle fibers like you claimed..

I have once again supplied my side of the arguement but you have still yet to supply us with proof of your claims....bro... ::)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote
I know several people who have used Synthol in the past. It's injected into the heads of the muscles to cause oil to enter the muscle and then after a few weeks it naturally dissipates. Once it dissipates there is a room left over where the synthol used to be,REAL muscle can be grown there. The temporary hollow area is a highly anabolic environment which causes the muscle to naturally "fill out" and fill the area that the oil used to be. New muscle fibers form to fill the area within a few weeks and then you have actuall real muscle replacing it.

This guy has IMPLANTS. There is NO WAY this can be caused by simple synthol injections. I won't repeat myself again...OIL DISSIPATES. Any sort of liquid injected into the muscles or which forms in the muscles dissipates. Anyone who's ever injected testosterone into therself knows that it dissipates.

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 14, 2006, 03:55:20 PM
Apollo - I do not need to use a spellchecker ,but I would urge you to try it sometime.

 You have no idea the amount of dumbing down I have to do to converse with you on a level you can understand :)


Oh my the Irony...


If you had ever bothered to read my posts in any detail,instead of rushing to type your responses, you would understand that the issue I have with you is your ridiculous claim that Plastic surgeons have willingly performed operations to create those arms. It is nothing even remotely connected to performing an implant insertion in the female breast,which is largely comprised of fatty tissue and avoids the nerves,tendons,arteries etc.. of the arm.

 The fact is that these guys do inject liquid silicone - it is a cocktail of synthol,silicone and other agents. If you had listened,you would have understood this. This is well known,men have died doing this - injecting it into their dicks and arms. No plastic surgeon would touch an area so threatening to their career and create walking time bomb freaks,ready to drop dead.

1.Paid enough a doctor would do ANYTHING. Many doctors do things "under the table" so to say if they are paid enough.

2.I have already elaborated that it could possibly be silicone or other injectable agents.(Aside from Synthol). I stated probably in the 2nd page that It could possibly be from injective massive amounts of silicone into the muscles.


Everything these guys do,they do to themselves..they do not pay a plastic surgeon to do this to them,they use a combination of liquid silicone and synthol, in different quantities,fact!. Go to any MD,Bodybuilding board and you will find this out.

 You know this is right,just accept it instead of making an idiot of yourself. This is the last time I will explain it to you.If you choose to be ignorant that is your choice but please be aware : you will never be taken seriously again and eventually people will ignore you for being a fool trying to get attention.

1.I've already proven that Plastic Surgeons would do ANYTHING to someone given enough $$$.

Want another example?

(http://www.innastrona.pl/images/lifestyle/bodymod_1.jpg)


2.Actually the whole Implant concept came from working professionals in the Synthol field on Steroidology.com

Quote
To answer the question, you can use it in any muscle group, but you have to change the way you use it.

Pecs need 3 rows of 3 shots per day per pec to cover the entire pec area, because the pecs are a 'flat' muscle as such the entire muscle has to be 'lifted' evenly.

Same with quads,etc. It is used succesfully in almost every muscle group.

If you do Syntherol PROPERLY, the size will become permanent as real muscle growth is facilitated and it looks natural. Problems are when people abuse it.

Now, this is for the morons, before they start spewing uneducated garbage:

1. Syntherol is NOT an implant. Muscle growth is facilitated if used properly, as properly means using it with the purpose of stretching the fascia of a muscle, then creating an ideal anabolic environment, so the 'space' left by the oil as it dissipates, it's replaced with muscle tissue.

2. the muscle is not 'fake' is used properly. See point 1. Also, because of that powerlifters use it too.

3. it is not any more dangerous to inject than any other injectible oil. It will not kill you any more than testosterone cypionate will!

4. the size will look real, the muscle will have more vascularity and striations IF used properly!

5. Don't be the ultimate cretin and use Valentino as an example as he has implants. It is impossible to look like that with SEOs! It jsut shows your stupidity and lack of education on the subject to use him as an example.

Any uneducated person on the subject is welcome to bring any moronic arguments forward that they wish, so I can crush them with experience, logic and medical evidence.

I am on a rant, because this subject brings out a lot of stupidity forward, from people that have NO CLUE about the subject. This has already been shown in this thread.

If you are not educated on the subject, do a search for my SEO article to educate yourself. It is all over the net.

The poster of this is Possibly a Professional Bodybuilder, I'm not sure. The mods over on Steroidology refer to him as a "Professional" and he has an "IFBB PRO" tag in his sig.

Posted by "Big A" on 10-02-2005

Owner of...
www.professionalmuscle.c om
www.rippedmass.org
www.discussworldissues.c om



Quote
Site Enhancing Oils, or 'synthol' as commonly known, are possibly the most controversial subject in bodybuilding. That is because there is a huge amount of miseducation and ignorance on the subject.
I first published the article below on the internet in early 2000, and since then it has been reproduced on countless websites and I have become as a the world most authorotive person on the subject, even consulting in the latest book on the subject written by the 'inventor' of the original SEO, Chris Clark.

In 1996 Chris Clark invented the first SEO (Site Enhancing Oil) and named it 'Synthol'. A quick phone call from brystol-Meyers, who hold the trademark rights on the 'Synthol' name, forced Chris Clark to change the name of his product to PumpNPose. However, the name of synthol was stuck with the bodybuilders.

The most popular now are Synthol/PumpnPose, Syntherol, EsikClean, Nuclear Nutrition Site Oil, Cosmostan and Liquid Muscle.

Synthol/PumpnPose is the original product. As such, it charges a lot of money and it's the most expensive variant as it relies on it's name to sell it - the cheapest found is $149.95. There must be a lot of fakes out there since the inventor of it, Chris Clark, charges a wholesale price of over $100 per bottle (and that's for large quantity), so there's no way that some outfits can retail it for $100. The only official distributor for PnP is www.meso-morph.com

Syntherol is my favourite simply because is the only one that I know of that is made by a real pharmaceutical company, so guaranteed sterile, plus it hurts less and the results seem to be better - don't take my word for it, ask around! It's the same formula as Synthol/PumpnPose, with added silica, which is a safe way to make the gains more 'permanent'. It's very refined, so it flows freely through a 28gauge needle, unlike the others which need as much as 21gauge needles to go through properly!
It's also the number 1 best selling Site Oil in the world, so they must be doing something right! And Synthetek (the maker of Syntherol) is the only company to offer a double money back guarantee and they never had any complaints from any customer from anywhere in the world! By far my choice, plus, it's cheap - $129.95. www.synthetek.com

EsikClean - same formula as Synthol, but it has colagen added. That makes it a very bad choice to use in my opinion. When you use site oils, the biggest problem is the formation of scar tissue. You don't want any scar tissue build up when you use site oils. Scar tissue is colagen buildup due to the trauma caused to the muscle by sticking a needle in there. As such, I would not help the build up of scar tissue in the muscle by injecting colagen. So, that's a bad choice. $100 per bottle www.synthol-direct.com Plus these are the people that counterfited Chris Clark's PnP and Synthetek's Syntherol, so one wonders how 'genuine' they are. Their associated websites are www.synthol.com, www.finalabs.com, www.zoelabs.com, www.pumpnpose.com, www.primolabs.com I strongly recommend that people stay away from them!

Nuclear Nutrition Oil - is a very good product, which works quite well. It's exactly as Syntherol, plus the addition of a small amount of prohormones. I am not a big fan of prohormones due to the reason that they will give you more side effects than benefits. Also, because of the prohormones, you cannot import it into countries like Canada or Australia, where prohormones are illegal. Still a good product - $149.95 www.nuclearnutrition.com

Cosmostan is another one that I recomend that people don't use. It has two anabolic steroids added to it. Because the SEO oil is a very long chain fatty acid, it will wrap itself around the steroid oil, as such not allow the steroid oil to be dissipated timely and for the body to assimilate the steroid. Also, both steroids contained in it are esterified, as such, they would have absolutely zero effect on localised growth as all esterified steroids have to travel to the liver first. Also, because of the steroids contained in it, it is illegal in most places in the world and women cannot use it. On top of all this, it also contains collagen, which as previously mentioned is an extremely bad idea as collagen primary causes scar tissue, exactly what should be avoided during SEO use. I am not sure of the price (never been interested in this product). Available from www.apex-pharmaceuticals.com

Liquid Muscle - same as PumpnPose, but at $199.95 per bottle. However, I can't find too much about it and about who makes it, as it seems as a small outfit and as such I have trouble trusting it 100%, especially when I am supposed to inject their stuff into MY body. They do advertise all over the bodybuilding magazines in the back sections, but that doesn't mean much. www.liquidmuscle.com

There's a ton of other brands, but the above are the most well known. The other brands available, I personally would not trust since they come from very small outfits, so you don't know whether they are sterile, properly manufactured or most likely just mixed together in somebody's 'bathtub'.

Site oils can be used for two purposes - to increase the size of a muscle or to shape a muscle.

To increase size, lets use the biceps for example. You need to inject in EVERY head of the muscle, while rotating the shots daily within that head. This is the only way to ensure that the added size keeps to your natural look/shape of the muscle. The quickest way to get a muscle up to maximum size is to do the following regimen: 1ml for 10 days in each head of the muscle. 2ml for 10 days. 3ml for 10 days. If you do both, the biceps and triceps simultaneously, you can add up to 3" on your arms in those 30 days.
Now, this is VERY IMPORTANT!!!: you HAVE to massage the area that you just injected SEVERELLY! You have to make sure that there's no lump forming. The muscle should always be soft. You should NEVER have a lump. It is also a good idea, to inject just before going to the gym, so as soon as you get to the gym, you should do a couple light weight, high reps sets for that muscle, to get the blood moving. This again will minimise lump formation. You have to keep in mind, that as soon as lumps form because you did not massage, scar tissue will form as well. You want to avoid scar tissue at all costs. Also, to minimise scar tissue build up, use VERY small needles, like 25g or 26g, inch or 1inch long (depending on the injection site) and inject VERY slowly. If you find that you cannot keep with the lump build up, but you are due for another shot, wait until, by massaging, the lump goes away (it should not be more than a couple of days) and then resume from where you left off.

If you have all the size you wish and just want to shape the muscle, as adding a peak on the biceps, then inject the spot, in the peak of the muscle, with 1ml every day or every second day until you obtain the peak that you desire.

What I recommend to people that are just starting out using these oils is to use 1ml per head of muscle per day, or every second day, for a week or so and see how they react to it. That way they can judge how many ml they can use per muscle head and how often.

Where to inject - BICEPS - inner and outer head. You can feel the `split' in between the two heads of the biceps when you feel with your other hand. Inject on each side of that. If you want to increase the length/thickness of the bicep, inject more in the inner head (closer to your body). If you want to increase the peak, inject more in the outer head.

TRICEPS - You don't need to inject in the outer/horseshoe head, unless it is really lacking behind. You inject in the middle and rear heads of the triceps. Generally, at the back of your arm, the upper portion is the rear head and the lower portion is the middle head, as the two heads overlap each other somewhat.

DELTOIDS - just inject straight into whatever head is lacking in size.

CALVES - Natural calves, no matter how big the are, have a `flat' look to the muscle. So you want to keep that look, you don't want to have your calves looking round like someone stuck an air hose in there. So, you inject in multiple shots, on the outside edges of the muscle. That will make the calf go outwards, while keeping the flat, natural look.

QUADS - With muscles this large, you need to do multiple daily injections. Where in the biceps you use 1ml per head per day to begin with, on quads you need to start with 1ml per site, 7 sites per quad. That is to avoid the `lumpy' look and keep the quad uniform. Again, to keep the natural look of the thigh, you should inject in the `peak' of the outer quad, injecting along the crest. If the teardrop is lacking, then just inject straight into it, rotating sites daily. I personally don't recommend quad shots, especially teardrop, due to the very high amount of nerves in the area.

PECS - pecs are a very large, 'flat' type of muscle. As such, the injections have to cover the entire area of the muscle, to 'lift' it at the same time, otherwise a lumpy look will result. I recomend three rows of three shots per pec per day.

I strongly recommend that you get some anatomy charts and study the muscles and the nerves that are in the area that you want to inject.

How do Site Oils work? To begin with, they do not stay in the muscle for 3 to 5 years. They get dissipated within months. However, during this time, they have stretched the fascia of that muscle. The fascia is a great constrictive factor in muscle growth. The more stretched the fascia is the more the muscle will grow and the more it will have that `popping' look. Site oils stay in there long enough for the fascia to stretch. As they dissipate, the `space' left by them is replaced with new muscle tissue growth. That is the reason why when x-rays/MRIs where performed on some of the people that have 25"+ arms, there was no oil found in there. The oil dissipated and it was replaced by real muscle.
The principle is the same as the one behind site shots with steroids, but it works at a much a larger degree, because the Site Oils take that much longer to dissipate.
As well, this is the same principle behind fascial stretching. Howver, it is much more efficient with Site Oils. Best example is to imagine a baloon. You can pull on it and stretch it as much as you want, and you will stretch it a bit. But if you fill it with a liquid, you will be able to stretch it to a much larger degree than just pulling on it from the outside. This is the best way to compare the efficiency of fascial stretching versus using Site Oils.

Pain - obviously, any site shot hurts. The pain will minimise the more you inject, until it will not hurt any more. Site Oils hurt, but not as much as site injections with, lets say, Sustanon or Testosterone Propionate. However, as I said, they will hurt less and less the more you use them.

Dangers - Site Oils are safe, if certain precautions are taken, same as when injecting anything else. You always have to aspirate. Always! You DO NOT want the oil to go in a vein. Always massage the area after the shot so scar tissue build up doesn't occur. And most importantly - USE COMMON SENSE! If you have 16" arms, don't think that you will have 23" in 5 weeks! Because if you try that, you will end up with deformed looking muscles and you will be the laughing stock of the world. On a side note, people like Greg Valentino have implants, not SEO's in their muscles. It is physiologically impossible to look like these guys do with SEOs. Hopefully that puts that myth to rest.

Site Oils are there to help you break past a plateau. If your genetics indicate that you are 242 with 5% bf, but you only have 18" arms, then Site Oils will help you bring your arms in proportion.
All that I am saying is that Site Oils are there to aid the work that you do in the gym, not replace it!

Posted by "BIG A"


http://www.steroidology.com/forum/showthread.php?t=80514&highlight=synthol


Here is an attached Image of "BIG A"'s Bicep after "correct synthol use".

(http://www.steroidology.com/forum/kolekcja.php?attachmentid=514112)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 14, 2006, 04:03:23 PM

Well if this "synthol" is a so called muscle builder then it needs to be used in the medical field for post-polio victims, para-pelagic, nerve damaged victims, ect...

you are confusing "building new muscle" to " the body reacting and healing itself from a foreign chemical, ect, which causes bumps, swelling, ect...

QUOTE FROM ABOVE:
Artecoll utilizes the body's natural ability to encapsulate foreign bodies by the formation of connective tissue surrounding the PMMA beads. The process of encapsulation of the beads by the body's own connective tissue (collagen) is complete in about 3 months. Absorption and dislocation of the beads is prevented by the encapsulation of each individual bead with connective tissue. Localized growth reportedly takes place over several months as the body forms its own connective tissue around the beads.

Thats not building new muscle fibers like you claimed..

I have once again supplied my side of the arguement but you have still yet to supply us with proof of your claims....bro... ::)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wrong!!That article didn't say Synthol causes those things it said Artecoll and Silikon 1000 do. They clearly stated the difference between the two. You didn't even read the article did you?

Synthol(Unlike Artecoll or silikon 1000) dissipates gradually over a few weeks,Meaning collagen doesn't need to encapsulate anything when there is nothing there.


Try reading a source before posting....This is the 2nd time someone has made that mistake in this thread. Posting something that doesn't prove what they are saying and confusing what it says.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: rocket on March 14, 2006, 04:04:57 PM
That was an interesting read
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: TrueGrit on March 14, 2006, 05:18:49 PM
Nothing that you've ever said has refuted the fact that these guys do the injections themselves. You seem to to think posting other people's thoughts,that aren't even relevant to the point here - instead of your own- somehow compensates for your inability to analyse,logically,a really rather specific point.

 You claim that surgeons perform these implants when it is far more obvious and rational to assume that,as a lot of bodybuilders do and have done,they experiment with injections on themselves and use their own combination of oils. Again,you ignore what is convenient to you - plastic surgeons will do all sorts of things if you sign a disclaimer (they even make you like a lion if you want) but these are relatively safe procedures  and whilst visually not pleasant to most of us they are not potentially lethal and harmful to the human body.

Even if you find 1 surgeon in a million prepared to do it you will find a thousand mentally unstable people willing to take a syringe full of Silicone,synthol et al and inject it into their arm.
The fact is you claimed these were implants,everybody knows that is patently not true,they are combination of silicone,synthol and other oils injected regularly over time. No one is agreeing with you because you're wrong...you're also extremely unintelligent and I will say goodbye - just please be aware that everyone knows you're wrong and you can rip off articles from people but until you can utilise your own cognitive faculties and think for yourself you will keep looking an idiot.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 14, 2006, 05:29:35 PM
Nothing that you've ever said has refuted the fact that these guys do the injections themselves. You seem to to think posting other people's thoughts,that aren't even relevant to the point here - instead of your own- somehow compensates for your inability to analyse,logically,a really rather specific point.

(Notice he completly evades my entire post and calls it all "Irrelevant" even though it ist a detailed explanation of how synthol works and why it can't be resposible for guys like valentino.)

You claim that surgeons perform these implants when it is far more obvious and rational to assume that,as a lot of bodybuilders do and have done,they experiment with injections on themselves and use their own combination of oils. Again,you ignore what is convenient to you - plastic surgeons will do all sorts of things if you sign a disclaimer (they even make you like a lion if you want) but these are relatively safe procedures  and whilst visually not pleasant to most of us they are not potentially lethal and harmful to the human body.

You haven't proven that such an implant would be unsafe if done correctly.


Even if you find 1 surgeon in a million prepared to do it you will find a thousand mentally unstable people willing to take a syringe full of Silicone,synthol et al and inject it into their arm..

Maybe so. I never denied it was Silicone.


The fact is you claimed these were implants,everybody knows that is patently not true,they are combination of silicone,synthol and other oils injected regularly over time. No one is agreeing with you because you're wrong...you're also extremely unintelligent and I will say goodbye - just please be aware that everyone knows you're wrong and you can rip off articles from people but until you can utilise your own cognitive faculties and think for yourself you will keep looking an idiot.

(Notice now he's running away once I have refuted him over and over!)

The fact is "TrueGrit", You're a complete fool. I try to stay away from personal insults but you make it difficult when that's apparantly all you have..Insults. You call me unintelligent when I have proven my argument beyond a reasonable doubt? You proclaim those are synthol injections even though i've demonstrated that can't possibly be true. I have explained how multiple implants are a likely explanation yet you still deny it all.
You still create strawmen even when I have explained that it COULD be silicone injections.

Funnier even...You still continue to respond with the same B.S. time after time even after you have said you would not be posting in this thread anymore. ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 14, 2006, 05:35:47 PM
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Chalky on March 14, 2006, 06:28:21 PM
lmao ive been reading this thread for last three days and i can say is Johnny Apollo u r one stupid idiot man . u havent proved shit. u keep sayin it was a doctor who put implants in the guys arms like that u r fuckin stupid of course truegrit is right and they inject that shit themself. i know i have buddies who are serious bodybuilders which u aint.noone agree with u becuz ur an idiot man.  wake up and smell the coffee u retard. also y r u backtrakkin u said it was implants then u say it might be silicon injections and then you call the guy that told u stupid. u r a funny guy think u need this smiley  :-X  ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 14, 2006, 06:36:14 PM
lmao ive been reading this thread for last three days and i can say is Johnny Apollo u r one stupid idiot man . u havent proved shit. u keep sayin it was a doctor who put implants in the guys arms like that u r fuckin stupid of course truegrit is right and they inject that shit themself. i know i have buddies who are serious bodybuilders which u aint.noone agree with u becuz ur an idiot man.  wake up and smell the coffee u retard. also y r u backtrakkin u said it was implants then u say it might be silicon injections and then you call the guy that told u stupid. u r a funny guy think u need this smiley  :-X  ;D

"Wow"



....That's about all I can say.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Chalky on March 14, 2006, 06:39:05 PM
sorry bro but u dont no when to quit. u keep saying different shit thenbacktrakkin and calling everyone else stupid
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 14, 2006, 06:52:32 PM
sorry bro but u dont no when to quit. u keep saying different shit thenbacktrakkin and calling everyone else stupid


Ahahaha!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on March 15, 2006, 05:34:31 PM
You can cleary see the injection sites on the man's biceps. So JA is proven to be wrong.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 15, 2006, 05:48:52 PM

You can't debate me so you copout with "Aww why do I bother" and other B.S.

Either refute my point or...

SHUT THE f**k UP


Breast implants are done outside of the muscle in the fatty area of the breast. This is common knowledge. If you don't know that,You're a fool.



http://www.advanced-art.com/Breast-Aug-Over-Under.htm



"you're a fool"




Also, that work on the green guy was not done by a plastic surgeon, it was done, without the use of anesthetic, by body morph/ tatoo artists.  So much for "proof"

Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 15, 2006, 05:52:11 PM
You can cleary see the injection sites on the man's biceps. So JA is proven to be wrong.

+1
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 15, 2006, 07:10:03 PM
The expression on the guy behind him: priceless..

Girlfriend looks thrilled.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: FREAKgeek on March 15, 2006, 09:08:35 PM
real fucking sad
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: gtbro1 on March 16, 2006, 03:35:55 AM
The average man with the average amount of exercise an average american gets who is the average height and average weight can benchpress 135-185lbs for 1 Rep Max.
The average amount he can curl on a barbell is 60-100lbs.(Below what you stated)
The average amount he can curl on a dumbell is 30-50lbs.(Below what you stated)

An Adult male at his physical peak who spends the average amount of time exercising who is 5'10" and 180lbs(Upper levels of average) can only curl a 100lb barbell 1 time.

I never stated any of those things about how much an average man can lift....I just said that if you have been lifting for 10 years and can barely curl a 60 lb dumbell then you have been doing something wrong...I HAVE NO CLUE what the average man who does not lift weights can curl,and I don't care
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Bear on March 16, 2006, 03:40:28 AM
Valentino's arms actually look hard and muscular compared to most of these goons. Credit to him for actually have some shape to his big fat stupid looking arms.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 16, 2006, 05:10:45 AM
As I've said, Valentino's starting to look "normal", he's old-school synthol.. ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: GreatFinn on March 16, 2006, 12:23:36 PM
The expression on the guy behind him: priceless..

Girlfriend looks thrilled.

Girlfriend look like a mugged up alcoholic. Boyfriend look like alcoholic wife beater. Do you math  ;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: knny187 on March 16, 2006, 01:13:44 PM
this guy is a god I tell ya.....a god
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Wombat on March 16, 2006, 07:36:45 PM
.



this picture tells the whole story...His girlfriend is obviously his sister(same exact face)...Nothing else needs to be said...
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: tommywishbone on March 16, 2006, 08:09:18 PM
this guy is a god I tell ya.....a god
;D
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: 240 is Back on March 16, 2006, 09:22:53 PM
this picture tells the whole story...His girlfriend is obviously his sister(same exact face)...

agreed
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Oliver Klaushof on March 16, 2006, 10:43:48 PM
These guys are seriously messed up. Amazing.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 16, 2006, 11:53:52 PM


http://www.advanced-art.com/Breast-Aug-Over-Under.htm



"you're a fool"




Also, that work on the green guy was not done by a plastic surgeon, it was done, without the use of anesthetic, by body morph/ tatoo artists.  So much for "proof"




This guy has plates implanted into his fucking brows. He had his tounge split in two. No anesthetic? Riiiight!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 17, 2006, 03:22:28 PM

This guy has plates implanted into his fucking brows. He had his tounge split in two. No anesthetic? Riiiight!


Don't believe me if you want.  You were proved wrong once by me already.  If you want me to do it again, you are stupider than I thought.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: buffalo on March 17, 2006, 05:12:04 PM
he looks like he's about ready to lose them to gangrene

I could understand if maybe he was blind guy who couldn't see the pathetic sacs of puss he calls "Bicep Muscles' hanging on his body..
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 17, 2006, 10:24:27 PM
"...more stupid..."

Stone, meet glass house.


He wouldnt have seen it.  But, now that you have pointed that out, I am sure that is what he will concentrate his focus on.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Van_Bilderass on March 17, 2006, 11:25:35 PM
I do believe some of these guys have implants. Don't know about Valentino, I'm inclined to believe he has oil since they are so lumpy and uneven. Seems like the implant guys are all coming from Germany. Someone post the pics of the older, bald German dude. You could clearly see the edges of the implants and they weren't lumpy at all like you get with oil. I'm 100% certain there is some unethical surgeon somewhere in Europe performing these surgeries. All of a sudden we have a slew of guys out of Germany with grotesque arms. One of the dudes did have pec implants also. If you look at the guys who shoot a lot of oil they never get it very symmetrical and even. The implant guys have perfectly symmetrical arms, side to side.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: pumpster on March 17, 2006, 11:30:01 PM
Just go with saline or silicone!
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 18, 2006, 01:24:40 AM

Don't believe me if you want.  You were proved wrong once by me already.  If you want me to do it again, you are stupider than I thought.



You've never proven me wrong on ANYTHING. If you have tell me where.

Stop making history up.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 18, 2006, 07:42:14 PM



Quote from: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 08:30:50 AM

Johnny Apollo says:




"Breast implants are done outside of the muscle in the fatty area of the breast. This is common knowledge. If you don't know that,You're a fool."














http://www.advanced-art.com/Breast-Aug-Over-Under.htm



"you're a fool"








miss that did we?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 18, 2006, 08:00:58 PM


Quote from: Johnny Apollo on March 10, 2006, 08:30:50 AM

Johnny Apollo says:




"Breast implants are done outside of the muscle in the fatty area of the breast. This is common knowledge. If you don't know that,You're a fool."















miss that did we?


What the hell are you talking about? That agrees with me. ::)
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 18, 2006, 10:04:04 PM


You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.



I am starting to enjoy quoting you.


How exactly does the link I posted agree with what you said?




"You're delusional."



Because I don't think you can comprehend:


Breast Implants Partially Under the Muscle:
      Photos at  left show partial  submuscular  implant coverage with implants placed  under  the muscle via either an areola (nipple) incision or an inframammary crease incision, thus disrupting the muscle support fascia at  the lower pole of the implant to allow it to enter  the space  under  the  muscle.   With  this  approach the implants are  mostly behind  the breast.   This approach has the Advantages of  mostly separating  the implants from the muscle, facilitating  unobstructed  mammography,  a  more  natural  look with  a  soft  transition from the flat  of the upper chest  wall  to  the round shape of  the implant,  much  less visibility and feel  of the implant  edges,  usually  no  rippling  (except  textured implants), and  low risk  of  capsule contracture,  as  long  as  the  implants have  not  been  contaminated   by   ductal  germs   while  being passed  through  the breast tissues.    Disadvantages include a bit more discomfort early post-op,  technique a bit  more difficult than  over  the  muscle,  and  the loss of the lower  pole  support fascia which leave the  implants  supported  by  the same weak skin  tissues  as  implants  over  the  muscle,      leading  to  later downward  bottoming-out  of  the implants in a few patients as is frequently  seen  in  implants  over  the  muscle.





you:


You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.




reality:  Breast Implants Partially Under the Muscle



you:


You're delusional.

Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress.

reality:  Breast Implants Partially Under the Muscle




 you:


Stop making up history


reality:  Yu have no idea what are are talking about, and all of your posts are moronic.



Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 18, 2006, 10:08:12 PM


I am starting to enjoy quoting you.


How exactly does the link I posted agree with what you said?




"You're delusional."



I simply said "Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle" I never said "ALL Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle". What I meant was that Some women don't get their implants under the muscle but in the fatty area.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 18, 2006, 10:10:11 PM


I simply said "Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle" I never said "ALL Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle". What I meant was that Some women don't get their implants under the muscle but in the fatty area.


so then, how can they still benchpress?? You made it clear that they can benchpress only because of the implant outside the muscle.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 18, 2006, 10:15:02 PM

so then, how can they still benchpress?? You made it clear that they can benchpress only because of the implant outside the muscle.

The implants don't effect the muscle function much....Think of Female Bodybuilders.


That's why guys like Valentino can still Curl even with implants.

Thus proving my point.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Van_Bilderass on March 18, 2006, 10:21:46 PM

so then, how can they still benchpress?? You made it clear that they can benchpress only because of the implant outside the muscle.
Yep. Apollo you obviously meant implants are never put under the muscle. Just admit you didn't know what you were talking about.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 18, 2006, 10:28:03 PM
Yep. Apollo you obviously meant implants are never put under the muscle. Just admit you didn't know what you were talking about.


I never said that. It's not my fault you interpret what I say into what you wanted me to say just to benefit your argument.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: gtbro1 on March 19, 2006, 05:42:47 PM

I never said that. It's not my fault you interpret what I say into what you wanted me to say just to benefit your argument.

 :o Shut the f up!! You have no clue what you are talking about.What you say does not even make any sense.You stated that "Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress."...now you are saying that you only ment some women.And how the f*ck would you know what effect an implant does or does not have on muscle function?...boob.
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 19, 2006, 07:20:19 PM
:o Shut the f up!! You have no clue what you are talking about.What you say does not even make any sense.You stated that "Women who have implants don't get them inside of the muscle,They get them in the fatty area of their chest OUTSIDE of their muscles..That's why they can still benchpress."...now you are saying that you only ment some women.And how the f*ck would you know what effect an implant does or does not have on muscle function?...boob.



Are you saying a 1lb silicone implant inside of the muscle does not effect it's function?
Title: Re: You thought Valentino had big arms...
Post by: Governor on March 19, 2006, 09:23:33 PM

I never said that. It's not my fault you interpret what I say into what you wanted me to say just to benefit your argument.


I do not understand how you can even listen to yourself talk.  Everyone, including yourself knows you were wrong.  Just admit it.