Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2015, 08:06:10 PM

Title: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2015, 08:06:10 PM
Just playing devil's advocate here, but he is supposedly 9lbs heavier, and he doesn't seem to have the distension as bad as in 03. Condition is still on point... although it looks like his left side might be starting to atrophy a bit.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2015, 08:08:40 PM
Some of '03
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Hulkotron on December 29, 2015, 08:09:52 PM
One of the bigger guys. 
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 29, 2015, 08:11:39 PM
Conditioning is suffering in those pics and did so the heavier he got.  He's in hard condition, but well off his best.  His best conditioned Olympia by far was 1998.  2004, although much heavier and more massive, was a far cry from his best, as was 2003.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Grape Ape on December 29, 2015, 09:08:03 PM
Running out of thread ideas?
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2015, 11:56:35 PM
Running out of thread ideas?

No more than you are running out of ways to be a caustic curmudgeon...
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 30, 2015, 01:47:28 AM
I thought this was interesting. Shows how badly off he was in '02...
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Royalty on December 30, 2015, 03:27:41 AM
I thought this was interesting. Shows how badly off he was in '02...

The most-muscular pic of Ronnie from the 2000 Olympia is freaky. Directly under it is the 2004 pic. I think that he weighed at least 20lbs more in 2004.... but he was better in 2000
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 30, 2015, 03:32:17 AM
2000 grand prix. Holy shit he was huge in 2000.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Royalty on December 30, 2015, 03:36:24 AM
2000 Mr O
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Royalty on December 30, 2015, 03:40:39 AM
Ronnie looked bad in 2002. No wonder Gunter was a serious threat
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 30, 2015, 03:41:52 AM
Really blew his prep that year... amazing how much he lost from the BFTO clip..
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Royalty on December 30, 2015, 03:44:37 AM
Jay @ 2002 Arnold would've beat Ronnie
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Brass Balls on December 30, 2015, 03:57:36 AM
Who cares how great he was. He looks like total garbage now.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Tha Grim Lifter on December 30, 2015, 04:09:36 AM
I thought 99 he was the best. 98 was better condition but 99 he was very close to it and outmassed everyone a lot more.

He kept getting too heavy and thinking the extra weight was all muscle. He should have dieted further down in later years although 2005 was good at 275.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 30, 2015, 09:11:38 AM
Poor Ronnie was a wreck in '07..
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Coffeed on December 30, 2015, 09:17:33 AM
Who was his drug dealer prep coach each year?
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Royalty on December 30, 2015, 09:21:46 AM
Who was his drug dealer prep coach each year?

Chad Nicholls
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: bigmikecox on December 30, 2015, 11:46:41 AM
His body was starting to break down in 2004
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Howard on December 30, 2015, 11:52:41 AM
Who cares how great he was. He looks like total garbage now.

Exactly! Imagine if you dug up Babe Ruth now. He'd look like shit and hit like a real deadbeat.
Just sayin'.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: affeman on December 30, 2015, 11:54:16 AM
He was probably his biggest and freakiest ever at that Russian GP post the 04 Olympia. Thick like an ox.

(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/d6/f2/1ad6f215987d9bb52c946fc2761edac0.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/0IGN4iI.jpg)
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Disco187 on December 30, 2015, 12:06:34 PM
if you watch ronnies last moch dvd of 2007 you could just see it in his face the whole time he knew his nerve injury was career ending, by 2007 it was more the over, seamed like he wasnt enjoying it any more (hell cant blame the guy though) he had nothing left to prove.

but wow i never realized he looked like shit in 2002 I always thought gunter had a great structure when he was full, great shoulders and arms and chest, lotta striations.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Iceman1981 on December 30, 2015, 04:03:42 PM
He was probably his biggest and freakiest ever at that Russian GP post the 04 Olympia. Thick like an ox.

(http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/d6/f2/1ad6f215987d9bb52c946fc2761edac0.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/0IGN4iI.jpg)

That pic is actually from the 2003 RGP, but yes he was probably his biggest at the 2004 RGP.
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on December 30, 2015, 08:20:46 PM
Exactly! Imagine if you dug up Babe Ruth now. He'd look like shit and hit like a real deadbeat.
Just sayin'.

Except Babe Ruth quit the game at 40 years old. Ronnie Coleman is still guest posing in his underwear into his 50's :-\
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: doison on December 30, 2015, 08:21:46 PM
Bigger but softer. 

HTH
Title: Re: COLEMAN in 2004: - how does it compare to '03?
Post by: Tha Grim Lifter on December 31, 2015, 02:43:53 AM
if you watch ronnies last moch dvd of 2007 you could just see it in his face the whole time he knew his nerve injury was career ending, by 2007 it was more the over, seamed like he wasnt enjoying it any more (hell cant blame the guy though) he had nothing left to prove.

but wow i never realized he looked like shit in 2002 I always thought gunter had a great structure when he was full, great shoulders and arms and chest, lotta striations.

I saw some of the 2002 video as they were all walking onstage. He still looked like the freakiest one there.