Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on January 12, 2016, 02:19:20 PM

Title: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Nether Animal on January 12, 2016, 02:19:20 PM
Actually looks impressive here.


Smaller waist means that he looks wider than any version of him that cam later, at least from a BB illusion point of view
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: njflex on January 12, 2016, 02:20:32 PM
Actually looks impressive here.


Smaller waist means that he looks wider than any version of him that cam later, at least from a BB illusion point of view

legs look nuts there... actually smallish pecs look good here at the time...he has grown leaps from there..
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Big Chiro Flex on January 12, 2016, 02:22:03 PM
looks his best ever in this pic.  should have stayed "small". 
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Powerlift66 on January 12, 2016, 02:23:23 PM
Crooked Genova like pose, his nose is wider than Heath...
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Dave D on January 12, 2016, 02:24:00 PM
Isn't this true for 90% of the modern era pros? They have a more "mainstream" look.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: njflex on January 12, 2016, 02:25:20 PM
Isn't this true for 90% of the modern era pros? They have a more "mainstream" look.
all look there best as amateurs today's group...80/90's guys for the most part improved as they went on into pro ranks better..
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Papper on January 12, 2016, 02:31:31 PM
I thought everyone knew.. He looked way better starting out

Abs sharper, better waist

This is business as Usual

Jay and ronnie looked better younger too
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: SF1900 on January 12, 2016, 02:32:55 PM
Actually looks impressive here.


Smaller waist means that he looks wider than any version of him that cam later, at least from a BB illusion point of view


Man, that is a horrible chest.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: njflex on January 12, 2016, 02:33:45 PM
Man, that is a horrible chest.
he filled in the gaps a bit over time..but yeah genetically not great..
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: doggler on January 12, 2016, 02:39:13 PM
 Huge nose growth reported.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: local hero on January 12, 2016, 03:25:00 PM
I thought everyone knew.. He looked way better starting out

Abs sharper, better waist

This is business as Usual

Jay and ronnie looked better younger too


You kidding, Ronny looked shit until his break out year, as his low placing's showed
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Nether Animal on January 12, 2016, 03:28:22 PM

You kidding, Ronny looked shit until his break out year, as his low placing's showed

"Looked shit?" Dunno bout that... maybe in comparison to his '98-'00 looks.


Consider this, what if Ronnie retired due to injury in early '98? I think we would still look at him as one of the better guys in the most competitive era, and that is hardly shit by any measure...
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: local hero on January 12, 2016, 03:30:18 PM
"Looked shit?" Dunno bout that... maybe in comparison to his '98-'00 looks.


Consider this, what if Ronnie retired due to injury in early '98? I think we would still look at him as one of the better guys in the most competitive era, and that is hardly shit by any measure...

I think your being very liberal with what you consider young Ronny, he was a pro since the early 90's, he dint improve until 97 onwards
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Hulkotron on January 12, 2016, 03:31:35 PM
looks his best ever in this pic.  should have stayed "small". 

It is great that you have recovered your account password.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Tha Grim Lifter on January 12, 2016, 03:31:44 PM
I think your being very liberal with what you consider young Ronny, he was a pro since the early 90's, he dint improve until 97 onwards

He looked better in 96 than 94 and 95. That's improvement.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: local hero on January 12, 2016, 03:36:46 PM
Have you not been following this thread at all then?
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Nether Animal on January 12, 2016, 03:47:26 PM
I think your being very liberal with what you consider young Ronny, he was a pro since the early 90's, he dint improve until 97 onwards

He improved all along, but started gaining serious momentum after '95 but everyone knows the story there.


I think he always looked great as a pro, IMO early on cuz of his super tiny waist. Of course that's just my personal opinion, and I prefer his '96 NOC-period look over some of his Olympia wins because his waist was still so super tight.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Big Chiro Flex on January 12, 2016, 03:57:57 PM
It is great that you have recovered your account password.

thank you, i took a lengthy sabbatical to pursue a spice trading venture in the west indies.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Parker on January 12, 2016, 06:15:53 PM
I thought everyone knew.. He looked way better starting out

Abs sharper, better waist

This is business as Usual

Jay and ronnie looked better younger too
Yep. He looked his best 05 to about 07. Maybe 08.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Yamcha on January 13, 2016, 06:27:39 AM
he filled in the gaps a bit over time..but yeah genetically not great..

filled the gaps in with oil.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Weedlejuice on January 13, 2016, 07:14:54 AM
Actually looks impressive here.


Smaller waist means that he looks wider than any version of him that cam later, at least from a BB illusion point of view


The arm, delt bellies and fullness is just insane here, wonxer if he was using slin at this point
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Mitch on January 13, 2016, 07:51:04 AM
I agree. I remember him making a flex cover back in 2006 I think, he had a very aesthetic build.


that one:

(http://www.crowntiques.com/images/336/IMG_0932.JPG)

yeah I know, toshop, lighting, tan, blabla, fuck off.
Title: Re: CHEATH in 2005 > CHEATH in 201X
Post by: Papper on January 13, 2016, 08:34:17 AM
Yep. He looked his best 05 to about 07. Maybe 08.

Yeah.. His muscles were crazy full for his frame and age

Now he caught up and has grown into them, in a bad way