Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on January 26, 2016, 03:14:44 PM

Title: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Nether Animal on January 26, 2016, 03:14:44 PM
Ronnie was way, way off this year, and Kevin was in great shape! Kevin's legs are way down by this point, and I think it cost him the show
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: Nether Animal on January 26, 2016, 03:16:59 PM
.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: ritch on January 26, 2016, 03:19:49 PM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful cock he sports....
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: Skeletor on January 26, 2016, 03:29:40 PM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful sock he sports....

Fixed. No homo.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: ether on January 26, 2016, 03:45:16 PM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful cock he sports....

Oh my!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: Kwon_2 on January 26, 2016, 04:34:48 PM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful cock he sports....

Oh no!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: trapz101 on January 26, 2016, 06:15:03 PM
Except for 91 i never see levrone as a true contender for mr.o
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Hulkotron on January 26, 2016, 07:07:36 PM
Except for 91 i never see levrone as a true contender for mr.o

Has a bit of that bloofy Phil Heath look to him.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: SquidVicious on January 26, 2016, 07:55:17 PM
Beginning of the end for Ronnie that year. Injected calf mass beginning to deteriorate. Waist starting to spill over. Leg separation on the downside. Arm mass beginning to petrify.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: ritch on January 26, 2016, 07:57:13 PM
Fixed. No homo.

I would wear that sock on my hand and jerk off with it.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: Rudee on January 26, 2016, 08:01:49 PM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful cock sock he sports....


Fixed.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: pellius on January 26, 2016, 10:09:26 PM
Beginning of the end for Ronnie that year. Injected calf mass beginning to deteriorate. Waist starting to spill over. Leg separation on the downside. Arm mass beginning to petrify.

Really? Don't you remember how he came in for the  2003 O?
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043301&d=1326652222)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4041071&d=1326578135)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043161&d=1326652030)
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Ropo on January 27, 2016, 12:24:15 AM
Ronnie was way, way off this year, and Kevin was in great shape! Kevin's legs are way down by this point, and I think it cost him the show

So, you are blind and evaluate the pictures by touching the monitor with your forehead? Ronnie is far better shape, Kevin is soft like a tit, no cuts what so ever. For god sake, why don't you nerds take time and learn how these competitors should be judged? There is rules for that, certain things which help you to understand why the placing's goes like they do:

Bodybuilders are judged on the overall quality of their muscular development. Judging is based upon the presentation of:

Mass
Definition
Proportion
Symmetry
Stage Presence

At the comparison Ronnie wins the size, the depth of the muscles(mass), he is dryer, show more cuts(definition), he presents himself better, he is better poser (stage presence) so he wins three from five. Fans of Kevin will be disappointed, and still after years they are writing about this quite simple and clear judging, just because they are idiots  ;D
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: Royalty on January 27, 2016, 02:42:59 AM
I pick Levrone for the big wonderful cock he sports....

It was determined here years ago that Levrone started stuffing his speedo's in the early 2000's
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Disco187 on January 27, 2016, 05:38:53 AM
Has a bit of that bloofy Phil Heath look to him.

i was thinking the same thing, Levrone always had that look, great side tricep poser but the muscle density was never there
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Iceman1981 on January 27, 2016, 09:44:13 AM
Kevin's back was also not up to par with Ronnie's.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: bigmikecox on January 27, 2016, 09:55:23 AM
Kevin wasnt close to Ronnie. Gunter should have been 2nd that year! All 2002 did was piss Ronnie off!!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!
Post by: local hero on January 27, 2016, 11:00:40 AM
Fixed. No homo.


Spoilsport!... His bulge is real to me dammit!!!!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Bevo on January 27, 2016, 12:15:06 PM
If Cormier won that show , most prob wouldn't have a problem with that
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Parker on January 27, 2016, 12:21:11 PM
If Cormier won that show , most prob wouldn't have a problem with that
If Cormier had won, then it may have made it harder for Cutler, or no Cutler at all. Which would mean bodybuilding would have been saved from the fate that it has now.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Rascal full on January 27, 2016, 12:27:06 PM
Really? Don't you remember how he came in for the  2003 O?
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043301&d=1326652222)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4041071&d=1326578135)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043161&d=1326652030)

Damn!! This version of Ronnie still the most impressive sight to grace a bodybuilding stage.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: affeman on January 27, 2016, 12:50:26 PM
Damn!! This version of Ronnie still the most impressive sight to grace a bodybuilding stage.

yeah? ::)

(http://goldenmuscles.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Phil-Heath-Kai-Greene.jpg)
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: DroppingPlates on January 27, 2016, 01:05:03 PM
yeah? ::)


yes
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Iceman1981 on January 27, 2016, 04:14:46 PM
yeah? ::)

(http://goldenmuscles.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Phil-Heath-Kai-Greene.jpg)

Game OVER for Phil and Kai!!!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: DroppingPlates on January 27, 2016, 04:29:49 PM
Game OVER for Phil and Kai!!!

It might take decades before someone supersedes this look...
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Nether Animal on January 27, 2016, 04:51:31 PM
yeah? ::)

(http://goldenmuscles.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Phil-Heath-Kai-Greene.jpg)

Lol, most dedicated troll on Getbig. Congrats.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Hulkster on January 27, 2016, 07:05:13 PM
It might take decades before someone supersedes this look...

yup. that was Ronnie 99, his all time best in many people's opinion.

257 but shreaded.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: OB1 on January 27, 2016, 07:07:32 PM
Lol, most dedicated troll on Getbig. Congrats.

x2
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: affeman on January 28, 2016, 01:07:15 AM
Game OVER for Phil and Kai!!!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=603692.0;attach=668072;image)

lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: SquidVicious on January 28, 2016, 01:50:41 AM
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D
If you think Phil could ever hold a candle to Ronnie in that pose or in that photo you're a fucking moron.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Weedlejuice on January 28, 2016, 02:10:49 AM
If you think Phil could ever hold a candle to Ronnie in that pose or in that photo you're a fucking moron.

This tbh, every bodybuilder of the 90's and those who saw him in person agree's.

phil could stand 2 body lengths infront of the line and ronnie would still dwarf him.

47 shredded lbs over phil on stage, do the math.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Nether Animal on January 28, 2016, 02:33:05 AM
47 more shredded lbs over phil on stage, do the math.

Faxed.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: DroppingPlates on January 28, 2016, 04:06:34 AM
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D

It amazes me that you dare to compare a man sans foundation with Ronnie. You're a consistent troll or borderline delusional, prob both..
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Royalty on January 28, 2016, 04:59:15 AM
Affeman: prepare to be subjugated


Phil Heath could not beat Jay Cutler.... Jay owned Phil... until Jay turned 38 and tore his bicep. Then Phil FINALLY was able to barely beat Jay.

But...

Ronnie ROUTINELY beat Jay Cutler. Year after year.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Pet shop boys on January 28, 2016, 05:15:05 AM
Kevin wasnt close to Ronnie. Gunter should have been 2nd that year! All 2002 did was piss Ronnie off!!

Exactly, Levrone's torso was just inferior to Ronnie's .


WooSHHHHH
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Iceman1981 on January 28, 2016, 10:25:36 AM
lol Nice try, troll. Just imagine how insane Phil would look like with a shitty, blurry 90s cam in semidarkness :D

LOL ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: SquatsRule on January 28, 2016, 01:03:47 PM
Ronnie had bad gyno that year and his stomach was really distended. If Levrone's legs were better, he would have won.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: bigmikecox on January 28, 2016, 01:10:01 PM
Heath is good, no doubt, but Ronnie was a different sort of creature!
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Royalty on January 30, 2016, 09:28:43 AM
Ronnie had bad gyno that year and his stomach was really distended. If Levrone's legs were better, he would have won.

lol

IF Levrone's legs, back, and chest, were bigger....
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: bigkid on January 30, 2016, 09:53:59 AM
Levrone was closer to winning in 2000 then he was 2002
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Mothballs on January 30, 2016, 07:42:13 PM
It might take decades before someone supersedes this look...

 2003 Coleman was the most impressive ever to stand on stage he was light years ahead of everybody. Like you said it might be 10-20 years before we see anything like that again. The only thing Kevin might have been better than Coleman was is POSING. That's about it. Coleman beats him in every thing else.

 Okay so Kevin had better triceps but at the end of the day he couldn't hold a candle to Coleman.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Danimal77 on January 30, 2016, 08:01:05 PM
Ronnie was way, way off this year, and Kevin was in great shape! Kevin's legs are way down by this point, and I think it cost him the show

Out of curiosity, how do you find the time to post on average 15 times a day on a bodybuilding site? Did you just wake up one day last year and say to yourself, I want to devote a good part of my day to being on getbig? This actually goes for all posters who literally live on here and have a higher post count than people who have been on here for a decade or more (like me).
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Danimal77 on January 30, 2016, 08:07:45 PM
Except for 91 i never see levrone as a true contender for mr.o

You're right. Kevin shouldn't have even been in the top ten... ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: DroppingPlates on January 31, 2016, 02:26:41 AM
2003 Coleman was the most impressive ever to stand on stage he was light years ahead of everybody. Like you said it might be 10-20 years before we see anything like that again. The only thing Kevin might have been better than Coleman was is POSING. That's about it. Coleman beats him in every thing else.

 Okay so Kevin had better triceps but at the end of the day he couldn't hold a candle to Coleman.

Well said, yeah Kev had a sick pair of triceps
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: pellius on January 31, 2016, 05:02:41 AM
When I see pics of Levrone I ask myself how was this guy not a Mr. O. But when he stands next to Ronnie, as with everybody else, he looks so small. Ronnie was just so damn big. So much pure muscle on that frame.

(http://www.ambal.ru/62096526011.jpg)
 
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Earl1972 on January 31, 2016, 02:20:17 PM
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: ritch on January 31, 2016, 04:36:48 PM
There's no way in hell Levrone could beat Coleman but his free posing that year was a hell of a good routine. I've watched it countless times, he has rock star appeal but the show was never "Ronnie VS kevin"
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Bevo on January 31, 2016, 06:02:05 PM
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E


Levrone at his best vs Ronnie at his best Ronnie is better

Levrone has the physique more people strive for in terms of pro bbers
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: pellius on January 31, 2016, 06:26:41 PM
ronnie got LevrOWNED in 2002, everybody that saw the show live knew it and neither one was at their best

i don't care how "big" ronnie was in 2003 he looked like absolute shit and that was the final death blow to this sport, mr. o was no longer about having a body you would want it was about who looks the most like a chemical experiment gone wrong


E

I think the time is long gone that the top bber is someone you would want to look like. That's why we have the physique class.

People are looking for freaks. Something not of this world. Someone that makes your jaw drop. Something that you point at, say Ramy's quads, and say "Look at that! How can that be? How can a leg be so huge?"

But it just goes to show how subjective this cult is. You think 2003 Ronnie looked like "absolute shit." I think it will be while before anyone can surpass that level of development.

Absolute shit?

(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043361&d=1326652356)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043311&d=1326652222)
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: ritch on January 31, 2016, 06:48:17 PM
Ronnie in 2003 is GOAT status, just insane.
To parrot what was said, it will be a hell of a long time until we see that again.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Mothballs on January 31, 2016, 09:33:39 PM

 Kevin was a little more aesthetically pleasing than Ronnie and had better tricpes but when he turned around he sort of faded away next to Ronnie. He wasn't better. It will be a whole new generation of Getbiggers on here before we ever see anything come close to Ronnie in his prime.
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: pellius on January 31, 2016, 10:27:54 PM
Ronnie in 2003 is GOAT status, just insane.
To parrot what was said, it will be a hell of a long time until we see that again.

After his lack lust showing in 2002 and losing to Gunter I think he realized that he might be getting complacent. Especially  the lost to Gunter, realizing that he can still lose, really lit a fire under his big, striated, Hebrew ass.  
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: OB1 on January 31, 2016, 10:30:55 PM
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=558345.msg7839047#msg7839047
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: Earl1972 on February 01, 2016, 12:31:57 PM
I think the time is long gone that the top bber is someone you would want to look like. That's why we have the physique class.

People are looking for freaks. Something not of this world. Someone that makes your jaw drop. Something that you point at, say Ramy's quads, and say "Look at that! How can that be? How can a leg be so huge?"

But it just goes to show how subjective this cult is. You think 2003 Ronnie looked like "absolute shit." I think it will be while before anyone can surpass that level of development.

Absolute shit?

(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043361&d=1326652356)
(http://forum.bodybuilding.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4043311&d=1326652222)

he's huge but looks horrible, this body was the official end to bodybuilding as we knew it

ronnie in 96 - 2000 with his huge lats and wide shoulders plus the extremely tight waist (in most poses) was "jaw dropping" for all the right reasons, ronnie 2003 was "jaw dropping" in the way people think "why the hell would somebody want to look like that", but hey i'll give him credit for having the best version of palumboism i ever saw

i didn't realize it then but now i know that was the end if that's what people in this sport wanted

E
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: pellius on February 01, 2016, 04:33:24 PM
he's huge but looks horrible, this body was the official end to bodybuilding as we knew it

ronnie in 96 - 2000 with his huge lats and wide shoulders plus the extremely tight waist (in most poses) was "jaw dropping" for all the right reasons, ronnie 2003 was "jaw dropping" in the way people think "why the hell would somebody want to look like that", but hey i'll give him credit for having the best version of palumboism i ever saw

i didn't realize it then but now i know that was the end if that's what people in this sport wanted

E

It is what they want which is why it isn't the end of the sport. When people are given what they don't want is when it ends.

Bodybuilding is about freaks which is why if Ramy ever hits his conditioning he will be the next O. 
Title: Re: 2002 O: RONNIE vs LEVRONE!!
Post by: old-school-lifter on February 01, 2016, 04:42:29 PM
Kevin had one of the top all time physiques, esp tri's and delts

but his back was a weakness- it lacked thickness especially.

and his legs after 98 were weak