Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: SF1900 on May 07, 2016, 04:20:53 PM

Title: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: SF1900 on May 07, 2016, 04:20:53 PM
Woah, someone has been focusing on training their back!

(http://i67.tinypic.com/5u1f06.png)
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: HTexan on May 07, 2016, 04:34:05 PM
Nice gut
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Ronnie Rep on May 07, 2016, 04:35:30 PM
That is a sick shot. Lets if Roelly can look like that on stage.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: affeman on May 07, 2016, 04:40:10 PM
All angle and lighting. On stage he'll look like shit again.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: SF1900 on May 07, 2016, 04:43:17 PM
Nice gut

Gut is one of the new standards for 21st century bodybuilders :)
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: calfzilla on May 07, 2016, 04:58:11 PM
.


Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on May 07, 2016, 05:04:41 PM
King Kamali's kitchen lighting says Hi
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Bosch on May 07, 2016, 05:05:30 PM
That's some mighty glutes.
He's got no mid and lower back to match those arms though.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Royalty on May 07, 2016, 05:08:58 PM
Woah, someone has been focusing on training their back!

(http://i67.tinypic.com/5u1f06.png)

Phil's back... in that bathroom.. would look even better
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: basil on May 07, 2016, 05:18:04 PM
Nice butt.

Fixed.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Fortress on May 07, 2016, 06:49:51 PM
His injectionsite muscle is coming along nicely.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: The Scott on May 07, 2016, 08:19:15 PM
Woah, someone has been focusing on training their back!

(http://i67.tinypic.com/5u1f06.png)

I dunno...Looks like the schmoe guy with the camera is focusing on someone's buttocks.  Schmoetography in action!
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: _aj_ on May 08, 2016, 05:50:55 AM
Woah, someone has been focusing on training their back!

(http://i67.tinypic.com/5u1f06.png)

If he were to photoshop that bit of palumbo that's sticking out in the shadow and go all IG wasp-waist, he could win the IG/Kamali Kitchen Klassic hands down.

For realz, the fukken guy always looks UN-FUCKING-REAL in this pics.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: falco on May 08, 2016, 06:17:21 AM
Looks great there.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Iceman1981 on May 08, 2016, 08:21:33 AM
He improved his back, but it's still not as good as Phil's. Lets wait and see until contest day. Roelly always messes up.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Papper on May 08, 2016, 01:54:55 PM
Phil's back... in that bathroom.. would look even better

roelly has better arms though, which this shot is all about - both bis tris and especially forearms - than phil - always had

Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Bevo on May 08, 2016, 01:57:28 PM
Roelly is all arms and nothing else

Stage pics he looks like shit
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 08, 2016, 02:00:34 PM
He improved his back, but it's still not as good as Phil's. Lets wait and see until contest day. Roelly always messes up.

Not during the grandma-area and some few exceptions after that
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Papper on May 08, 2016, 02:42:45 PM
whatever Rolley is doing pre-contest, he needs to do more of what he does off season instead.

where phil is a master at peaking, rolley is struggling

you absolutely need to have fullness on stage, or it's bye buddy boyo
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 08, 2016, 02:50:22 PM
whatever Rolley is doing pre-contest, he needs to do more of what he does off season instead.

where phil is a master at peaking, rolley is struggling

you absolutely need to have fullness on stage, or it's bye buddy boyo

It's Roelly ::)
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: affeman on May 08, 2016, 02:51:18 PM
Wider than Heath

(http://www.nutrisport-magazin.cz/wp-content/uploads/Roelly_Winklaar_et_Phil_Heath1-1024x683.jpg)
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: oldschoolfan on May 09, 2016, 05:29:04 AM
why is his bare ass showing  ?
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Pet shop boys on May 09, 2016, 06:40:42 AM
why is his bare ass showing  ?

To keep it bodybuilding related.


WoooSHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: aestheticsuk on May 09, 2016, 07:07:28 AM
whatever Rolley is doing pre-contest, he needs to do more of what he does off season instead.

where phil is a master at peaking, rolley is struggling

you absolutely need to have fullness on stage, or it's bye buddy boyo

are you a miscer?
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 09, 2016, 07:24:41 AM
why is his bare ass showing  ?

Because you want it to see
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Disco187 on May 09, 2016, 07:29:01 AM
Look how more full phil is in the top of the body , shoulders, upper chest, traps, etc. Im more of a winklar fan but man talk about loosing size while dialing down
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Mothballs on May 09, 2016, 07:14:36 PM
Roelly is the new Dennis James. Looks great in bathroom and gym pics but sort of gets all his flaws exposed standing next to equally quality people.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Nether Animal on May 09, 2016, 08:09:16 PM
They are bathroom pics, and you can tell by looking at them that they probably spend 15-20 minutes fucking with the lighting/angles to get it perfect. Means nothing.

In 2007 Gustavo looked INSANE from the back in the bathroom shots, but nobody really batted an eye then... how easy we forget (and of course the depth of field is crap even compared to then).
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Papper on May 09, 2016, 11:26:25 PM
It's Roelly ::)

O I'm sorry, Roelly

Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 10, 2016, 03:34:55 AM
O I'm sorry, Roelly



You stubborn Americans also say 'Barry Demay', while it's Berry de Mey. How hard is that to spell correctly ???
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: kyomu on May 12, 2016, 12:18:15 AM
Great back but it is missing the lower part.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: falco on May 12, 2016, 06:25:50 AM
Great back but it is missing the lower part.

No homo right?
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Grape Ape on May 12, 2016, 06:32:06 AM
You stubborn Americans also say 'Barry Demay', while it's Berry de Mey. How hard is that to spell correctly ???

If you have stupid names like Roelly and Berry, they deserve to be mispronounced.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: kyomu on May 12, 2016, 07:57:51 AM
No homo right?
According to Paco, the most of all pro have a good pair of testicles.(No homo)
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: milone79 on May 12, 2016, 08:17:29 AM
Wider than Heath

(http://www.nutrisport-magazin.cz/wp-content/uploads/Roelly_Winklaar_et_Phil_Heath1-1024x683.jpg)

everyone is wider than CHeath
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 12, 2016, 12:52:44 PM
If you have stupid names like Roelly and Berry, they deserve to be mispronounced.

It just means that the average American only speaks American-English
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Grape Ape on May 12, 2016, 05:05:15 PM
It just means that the average American only speaks American-English

I seriously doubt that mispronouncing "berry" demey is an American epidemic.  First off, "berry" is a common word, and second, nobody knows who the fuck Berry DeMay is.

So, I'm guessing you're basing your theory on a sample size of one.  Maybe two.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 12, 2016, 05:22:07 PM
I seriously doubt that mispronouncing "berry" demey is an American epidemic.  First off, "berry" is a common word, and second, nobody knows who the fuck Berry DeMay is.

So, I'm guessing you're basing your theory on a sample size of one.  Maybe two.

1988 Olympia, held in L.A.
Just take a look at 0:15, which says 'deMay' and 'Holland'. Knowing Berry in person, I'm pretty sure he's smart enough to spell his name correctly on the entry form, and 'Holland'? Give me a break, it's the Netherlands for almost 100 years already. This just shows how much Americans care about the rest of the world ::)

Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: Grape Ape on May 12, 2016, 07:54:06 PM
1988 Olympia, held in L.A.
Just take a look at 0:15, which says 'deMay' and 'Holland'. Knowing Berry in person, I'm pretty sure he's smart enough to spell his name correctly on the entry form, and 'Holland'? Give me a break, it's the Netherlands for almost 100 years already. This just shows how much Americans care about the rest of the world ::)



Lol, the video was produced in Europe.

Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: HTexan on May 12, 2016, 08:40:03 PM
Lol, the video was produced in Europe. A schmoes garage.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: DroppingPlates on May 13, 2016, 02:46:01 AM
Lol, the video was produced in Europe.



Wrong, it was original Mr O footage. The Weider company is behind this.
Title: Re: Is this back better than Phils?
Post by: _bruce_ on May 13, 2016, 03:04:20 AM
To keep it bodybuilding related.


WoooSHHHHHHH

 ;D ;D ;D