Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 04, 2016, 09:06:14 AM
-
"What kind of idiot loses a billions dollars in the casino industry"
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/justinholcomb/2016/10/03/remember-when-the-state-department-misplaced-6-billion-under-hillary-clinton-n2227198
-
(http://www.speakgif.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/desperation-is-a-stinky-cologne-animated-gif-31ghcpsbbm0pljqqg9naww.gif)
-
(http://www.speakgif.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/desperation-is-a-stinky-cologne-animated-gif-31ghcpsbbm0pljqqg9naww.gif)
I know. When the comparisons are made the left have nothing
-
They didnt lose shit - its called payoffs to thugs, dictators, etc.
-
I went to look-up the story, and endless examples of "missing billions" are out there, it looks like. This is on top of the "missing" trillions that were looted from the DoD.
WASHINGTON — A government website intended to make federal spending more transparent was missing at least $619 billion from 302 federal programs, a government audit has found.
And the data that does exist is wildly inaccurate, according to the Government Accountability Office, which looked at 2012 spending data. Only 2% to 7% of spending data on USASpending.gov is "fully consistent with agencies' records," according to the report.
Among the data missing from the 6-year-old federal website:
• The Department of Health and Human Services failed to report nearly $544 billion, mostly in direct assistance programs like Medicare. The department admitted that it should have reported aggregate numbers of spending on those programs.
• The Department of the Interior did not report spending for 163 of its 265 assistance programs because, the department said, its accounting systems were not compatible with the data formats required by USASpending.gov. The result: $5.3 billion in spending missing from the website.
• The White House itself failed to report any of the programs it's directly responsible for. At the Office of National Drug Control Policy, which is part of the White House, officials said they thought HHS was responsible for reporting their spending.
For more than 22% of federal awards, the spending website literally doesn't know where the money went. The "place of performance" of federal contracts was most likely to be wrong.
That's a problem, said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.
"We live in a world in which information drives decisions," Carper said. "And, given the budget constraints that our government faces, we need reliable information on how and where our money is being spent."
The report comes as the Obama administration begins to implement the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act, which Congress passed last year to expand the amount of federal spending data available to the public.
The report said the Office of Management and Budget needed to exercise greater oversight of federal agencies reporting spending data. "Until these weaknesses are addressed, any effort to use the data will be hampered by uncertainties about accuracy," the report said.
OMB spokesman Jamal Brown said the administration is already working to improve the data following the passage of the DATA Act last year. "OMB is committed to federal spending transparency and working with agencies to improve the completeness and accuracy of data submissions," he said in a statement.
The administration is also transferring responsibility for the website from the General Services Administration to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in the Department of the Treasury.
-
And did Trump bring this up in the debate? And if not why not?
-
Criminals are looting our government, which is already a shell game to begin with.
-
And did Trump bring this up in the debate? And if not why not?
Two more debates. Be patient. Hopefully he comes after her with both barrels and if he does and does it right, it's all over for her.
-
Two more debates. Be patient. Hopefully he comes after her with both barrels and if he does and does it right, it's all over for her.
Trump had the BIGGEST audience for Debate 1 and we all know it. Debate 2 - the ratings will be way lower after the complete waste of time No 1 was.
The POS opened herself so many times and trump let her slide - he is literally the worst candidate of my lifetime.
-
And did Trump bring this up in the debate? And if not why not?
I know. He could have made a big production out of it. I mean huge.
-
What a fuck job. We get the one guy who manages to come in from the outside, and he's not even serious about it.
-
Two more debates. Be patient. Hopefully he comes after her with both barrels and if he does and does it right, it's all over for her.
oh brother. He squandered the largest audience ever, for what reason?
I know you want to make this part of some awesome trump plan to get himself down 10 points, and then come back...
But seriously, trump really is, this shitty.
-
Come on Coach, you know how it is when it comes to Clinton scandals: "extremely careless", "the Russians are behind this!" and "Trump hates women" with a large serving of immunities and special treatment.
These and other issues should be constantly brought up (because sadly no one will be prosecuted) as most people and voters are hardly aware of them.
-
He's so shitty that she's out spending him, what? 10-1? Her rally's draw a fraction of his. Don't kid yourself. These debate will draw PLENTY because people love to a train wreck and both hitting each other so hard after the first debate, they want to see a fire fight.
-
He's so shitty that she's out spending him, what? 10-1? Her rally's draw a fraction of his. Don't kid yourself. These debate will draw PLENTY because people love to a train wreck and both hitting each other so hard after the first debate, they want to see a fire fight.
He needs to start spending money. He has no choice, unless he's trying to throw it.
Time to dust off the heavy suitcases.
-
He's so shitty that she's out spending him, what? 10-1? Her rally's draw a fraction of his.
I remember how big bernie's rallies were. And of course, palin, who brought so much energy to mccain's ticket.
everyone is losing faith in Trump... he's just not serious.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
-
He needs to start spending money. He has no choice, unless he's trying to throw it.
Time to dust off the heavy suitcases.
Totally agree he needs to spend everything he has at this point but I'm no way shape or form wokld I ever buy in a CT that's he's throwing the election. You don't come this far, expend all of this energy and get family and everyone else involved for over a year to throw an election. Don't let 240 get into your head. He has too much time on his hands.
-
You don't come this far, expend all of this energy and get family and everyone else involved for over a year to throw an election.
What has trump put into it?
He's given what, 200 speeches, each between 15 and 30 minutes, give or take?
He's done 8 or 10 debates.
He's done some tv appearances.
What has he gotten out of it?
His campaign used donor $ to pay for his plane, for Trump Tower for staff to stay at, etc. Trump company makes that.
And how has Trump's (and his kids') Q score increased over the year?
The Q Score (more popularly known as Q-Rating) is a measurement of the familiarity and appeal of a brand, celebrity, company, or entertainment product (e.g., television show) used in the United States. The higher the Q Score, the more highly regarded the item or person is among the group familiar with them.
At this point, they can start a network and outperform rush, hannity, fox, in a minute. They have the team, they have the fame.
Trump is a HUGE name that 1/3 of the nation absolutely loves. He used this campaign perfectly. Why become a president - hated by half his own party - and spend 4 years running into legislative walls - whne he can just keep on doing what he's doing, being a rock star.
-
Totally agree he needs to spend everything he has at this point but I'm no way shape or form wokld I ever buy in a CT that's he's throwing the election. You don't come this far, expend all of this energy and get family and everyone else involved for over a year to throw an election. Don't let 240 get into your head. He has too much time on his hands.
I agree. But one thing I'm sure of, to the point of no question, is that Bill Clinton had Trump marked.
It just makes me so mad to think that drunken sell-out is messing with our future like this, though. All because his wife isn't worthwhile to be president, so he's found a way to force her on us.
-
I agree. But one thing I'm sure of, to the point of no question, is that Bill Clinton had Trump marked.
Yep. He called him a week before trump announced, to "encourage him to get more involved in the political process".
Maybe trump's in on it. Maybe he's not. He's a very smart man who's always given himself a golden parachute... he's always made a fortune, even when declaring bankruptcy or declaring a billion dollar loss.
Trump will land on his feet, he always does. He'll be richer and more famous and whatever network or thing he does next, he'll be a huge success. But he doesn't want to be president. All he's done is shit on the GOP and make its' followers wear a "make liberals powerful again" hat for a year.
-
So are you guys going to vote Hillary?
-
So are you guys going to vote Hillary?
I would rather stick a hot poker in my eyes
-
I remember how big bernie's rallies were. And of course, palin, who brought so much energy to mccain's ticket.
everyone is losing faith in Trump... he's just not serious.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
Stupid comparison since it was proven her corruption did him in, not her campaign. She couldn't beat the local dog catcher in Mayberry without corruption.
-
Yep. He called him a week before trump announced, to "encourage him to get more involved in the political process".
Maybe trump's in on it. Maybe he's not. He's a very smart man who's always given himself a golden parachute... he's always made a fortune, even when declaring bankruptcy or declaring a billion dollar loss.
Trump will land on his feet, he always does. He'll be richer and more famous and whatever network or thing he does next, he'll be a huge success. But he doesn't want to be president. All he's done is shit on the GOP and make its' followers wear a "make liberals powerful again" hat for a year.
Everyone will look back on the fact he didn't spend money, though, and he's going to be the very first thing they think of every time Hillary stabs us in the back. I know people can be very stupid, collectively, but he's really testing the limits.
-
So are you guys going to vote Hillary?
F no. I'm voting for Trump but he makes me sick to my stomach. He is all that stands between us and Hillary and it sucks.
-
F no. I'm voting for Trump but he makes me sick to my stomach. He is all that stands between us and Hillary and it sucks.
this
-
Exactly. If she takes the WH, I'm going to be right there, hoping and praying she does right. But no way will I forget that Trump failed to bust out the $ when he most needed to do that. Think of that when he's flying around in his gold-plated jet or whatever.
-
What has trump put into it?
He's given what, 200 speeches, each between 15 and 30 minutes, give or take?
He's done 8 or 10 debates.
He's done some tv appearances.
What has he gotten out of it?
His campaign used donor $ to pay for his plane, for Trump Tower for staff to stay at, etc. Trump company makes that.
And how has Trump's (and his kids') Q score increased over the year?
The Q Score (more popularly known as Q-Rating) is a measurement of the familiarity and appeal of a brand, celebrity, company, or entertainment product (e.g., television show) used in the United States. The higher the Q Score, the more highly regarded the item or person is among the group familiar with them.
At this point, they can start a network and outperform rush, hannity, fox, in a minute. They have the team, they have the fame.
Trump is a HUGE name that 1/3 of the nation absolutely loves. He used this campaign perfectly. Why become a president - hated by half his own party - and spend 4 years running into legislative walls - whne he can just keep on doing what he's doing, being a rock star.
sounds like a smart move.. I'm almost buying in that he wants to lose.. your theory makes sense but if he was a plant like you say, are you telling me they(dems) took a 1-17 shot at the primary to get there guy in, and did?? I'll vote for him regardless. trouble either way this election tho.
-
sounds like a smart move.. I'm almost buying in that he wants to lose.. your theory makes sense but if he was a plant like you say, are you telling me they(dems) took a 1-17 shot at the primary to get there guy in, and did?? I'll vote for him regardless. trouble either way this election tho.
If you're Bill Clinton and you know your wife and her people are relying on your maneuvering skills, then any moment you can get out of a guy like Trump will be beneficial. Even just a single day is better than no day. And don't forget which two-faced CFR-operatives Trump had for opponents.
-
Stupid comparison since it was proven her corruption did him in, not her campaign. She couldn't beat the local dog catcher in Mayberry without corruption.
i'm listening to hannity today - ALL i hear is whining about the media. ugh. nobody watches cnn or msnbc, fox kills them in the ratings BUT somehow 'the media' is magically gettingblamed for the fact trump is a total dumbass.
-
sounds like a smart move.. I'm almost buying in that he wants to lose.. your theory makes sense but if he was a plant like you say, are you telling me they(dems) took a 1-17 shot at the primary to get there guy in, and did?? I'll vote for him regardless. trouble either way this election tho.
Maybe it was a 1-17 shot. But I think they knew early on that his odds were much better. He had hundreds of millions to spend. He got NONSTOP media coverage. He was anti-establishment in a totally anti-estab year. He has his own tv show for a decade. He was a ROCK STAR in a field of 16 other boring balding establihsment types - and even though 60% of repubs didn't like him, they split the vote enough for him to win.
I knew it early on that trump would win, thanks to his anti-immigrant talk. I said for a year straight, he'd be the guy. I predicted his announce date, long before he announced. I knew all along that trump would be the winner. He's just TOO GOOD for ratings lol.
The dems wanted trump. Media wanted him. and 40% of repubs wanted him. He was gonna get it. And worst case, if he did lose, at least he did some real GOP damage along the way.
george will, a highly conservative writer, said right away that trump was a dem plant. soul crusher agreed with me back in 2012 that trump was a dem plant -who nullified the birth certificate issue (a very legit issue BTW) by making himself the head of it, making a joke of it, then accepting the owning at the WH correspondents dinner. Trump legitimized obama for 2012 election, so that hilary woudln't be running against incumbent strong romney in 2016 ;)
-
sounds like a smart move.. I'm almost buying in that he wants to lose.. your theory makes sense but if he was a plant like you say, are you telling me they(dems) took a 1-17 shot at the primary to get there guy in, and did?? I'll vote for him regardless. trouble either way this election tho.
Trump THREW the first debate. He used his last 2 minutes to BRING UP rosie odonnell. He has talked about hilary's weaknesses for 16 straight week - but uses an audience of 100 mil primetime to bring up some feud from 5 years ago? bullshit move. He is too smart for that.
-
Trump THREW the first debate. He used his last 2 minutes to BRING UP rosie odonnell. He has talked about hilary's weaknesses for 16 straight week - but uses an audience of 100 mil primetime to bring up some feud from 5 years ago? bullshit move. He is too smart for that.
I agree, he is too smart for that... I also think the might be the easiest person to rattle in ive ever seen... if he fucks up the in the next one, itll truly make me wonder. or does he do well in #2 then fuck up #3??? to make it more believable??
-
I agree, he is too smart for that... I also think the might be the easiest person to rattle in ive ever seen... if he fucks up the in the next one, itll truly make me wonder. or does he do well in #2 then fuck up #3??? to make it more believable??
he will HAVE to do better in #2. I mean, he shit the bed in debate #1. He could just say half of what he would usually say, and do okay.
He is very rattle-able. He says some seriously crazy shit.
Saying he plans on attacking her marriage in the debate... that's extemely low-rent behavior.
-
Yes, to "attack" her because the husband's been a worm... not exactly good ammo, especially when there's so much real stuff to use against her.
But let's not forget it's about one short month away, and it's all over. This was Trump's to lose, and IMO that is exactly what he decided to do. And having that annoying bloated gasbag Assange acting like a circus sideshow without the fight he claims, hasn't been terribly helpful to us. Not cool in the slightest.
-
Yes, to "attack" her because the husband's been a worm... not exactly good ammo, especially when there's so much real stuff to use against her.
But let's not forget it's about one short month away, and it's all over. This was Trump's to lose, and IMO that is exactly what he decided to do. And having that annoying bloated gasbag Assange acting like a circus sideshow without the fight he claims, hasn't been terribly helpful to us. Not cool in the slightest.
The people who love the idea of a shitshow debate, with 3x married trump hating all over clinton's marriage for not being perfect...
Well, they have already supported Trump since last June anyway ;)
Not many undecided moderates are going to see Trump on TV, using the pre-presidential pulput to say "your marriage isn't perfect, your man cheated!" and suddenly feel she's unworthy, and that he's a safe ands table bet.
-
The people who love the idea of a shitshow debate, with 3x married trump hating all over clinton's marriage for not being perfect...
Well, they have already supported Trump since last June anyway ;)
Not many undecided moderates are going to see Trump on TV, using the pre-presidential pulput to say "your marriage isn't perfect, your man cheated!" and suddenly feel she's unworthy, and that he's a safe ands table bet.
Yes, true. I don't know of anyone who could deny it.
He had a momentary flash of reason and leadership, when he made those security proposals. Then he was like "nah, feck it" I guess. Too much hassle to lead us out of trouble, maybe. He'd rather be a bloated mess in peace.