Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: muscleman-2013 on October 07, 2016, 12:35:35 AM
-
-
Wadda nut
-
Love the logic.
Premise: No one has been to space
evidence: Video proof of Challenger accident
conclusion: No one has been to space
;D ;D ;D
-
Space, yes... the moon, no.
-
the moon, no.
What kind of evidence would make you to change your mind on that subject? :)
I'm not an expert of grand conspiracy theories and I'm not a political scientist but the fact that if moon landing wouldn't have happened so many people would be aware of it and since people are really social and unable to keep secrets we would know all the details by now. I guess the Russians would have call out America on that regard as well?
-
What kind of evidence would make you to change your mind on that subject? :)
I'm not an expert of grand conspiracy theories and I'm not a political scientist but the fact that if moon landing wouldn't have happened so many people would be aware of it and since people are really social and unable to keep secrets we would know all the details by now. I guess the Russians would have call out America on that regard as well?
I don't even try to argue people about this anymore. We have third party evidence, where universities and institutes tracked Apollo (11 - 17). We have the lunar orbiter sending back images of the landing sites. AND we have reflector mirrors set up by astronauts on the moon that we can shine lasers at, receive the laser reflection, and calculate the distance of the moon to the earth. This way we can track how fast the moon is moving away from the earth on a yearly basis.
Don't you think the USSR would have called America out on the moon landing as soon as Apollo 11 happened? Or would have sent their guys to "prove" that Apollo never made it to the moon? These conspiracy theories never add up and the only reason they work on some people is because they confuse the gullible.
-
Obligatory joke of Peace:
I may have not been to the Moon, but i've been inside Uranus!
of peace
-
"To the moon Alice"
-
Obligatory joke of Peace:
I may have not been to the Moon, but i've been inside Uranus!
of peace
Ba-Dum-Tsss
well done, my friend. well done.
-
-
there's far more interesting conspiracy theories.
like the one about arnold never winning mr olympia, his doppleganger did.
-
If the Earth is flat, could we dig through and fall into space? Seems to be the easier path if you ask me!
-
Love the logic.
Premise: No one has been to space
evidence: Video proof of Challenger accident
conclusion: No one has been to space
;D ;D ;D
there was no challenger accident???
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=618551.0
-
surprised... thought Wiggs would be all over this or at least started this thread ???
-
Yet another piece of crap video for foil hat morons. That kind of stupidity which allows people to believe crap like that cannot be possible without serious mental handicap, and that is all you have to know about these foil hat morons: They are bunch of idiots with serious mental handicap.
ps. evidence means something which you can prove to be a fact. You can't prove anything else than the fact, that you are a moron, drooling on your shoes.
-
I don't even try to argue people about this anymore. We have third party evidence, where universities and institutes tracked Apollo (11 - 17). We have the lunar orbiter sending back images of the landing sites. AND we have reflector mirrors set up by astronauts on the moon that we can shine lasers at, receive the laser reflection, and calculate the distance of the moon to the earth. This way we can track how fast the moon is moving away from the earth on a yearly basis.
Don't you think the USSR would have called America out on the moon landing as soon as Apollo 11 happened? Or would have sent their guys to "prove" that Apollo never made it to the moon? These conspiracy theories never add up and the only reason they work on some people is because they confuse the gullible.
Well said - The Japanese orbited the moon a couple of years back and also photographed the moon landing sights. As you say The Russian's and Japanese would have loved to have proven it never happened, but it did
-
Obligatory joke of Peace:
I may have not been to the Moon, but i've been inside Uranus!
of peace
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi3.kym-cdn.com%2Fentries%2Ficons%2Foriginal%2F000%2F012%2F132%2Fthatsthejoke.jpg&f=1)
-
Speculation isn't evidence.
-
There is a fixed mirror on the surface of the moon with public coordinates, anyone can verify its existence by calibrating a laser towards that mirror. With a detector you will be able to detect the laser beam as it strikes the mirror and bounces back to earth, had it not existed you wouldn't have detected anything as there would be nothing to reflect the beam back to you. Who installed it on the moon if no man have been there? ???
All these laymen "experts" thinking they have it all figured out. The moon landing hoax is on the same level of stupidity as flat earth theorists. Any physicist, or undergraduate engineering student for that matter, would be able to understand why every point made by these conspirators are void.
-
Watched in interesting video yesterday by Thomas Sheridan who claimed that the Nasa-hoax industry(plus others) is a foreign intelligence scam.
Yuri Bezmenov's videos regarding subversion seem to be pretty accurate.
-
Watched in interesting video yesterday by Thomas Sheridan who claimed that the Nasa-hoax industry(plus others) is a foreign intelligence scam.
Yuri Bezmenov's videos regarding subversion seem to be pretty accurate.
Unfortunately all what the foil hat morons have is claims and futile speculation. If they doesn't have any evidence at all, it is all bullshit. Evidence is something you can prove to be a fact. That day will never come to foil hat morons.
-
There is a fixed mirror on the surface of the moon with public coordinates, anyone can verify its existence by calibrating a laser towards that mirror. With a detector you will be able to detect the laser beam as it strikes the mirror and bounces back to earth, had it not existed you wouldn't have detected anything as there would be nothing to reflect the beam back to you. Who installed it on the moon if no man have been there? ???
Not sure if srs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_rover
-
Not sure if srs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_rover
Yes, because they definitely had today's Mars rover technology in 1969 (and then two more by Apollo 14 and 15) which carefully placed reflectors exactly the way humans would have to face the earth at the exact coordinates.
-
I don't even try to argue people about this anymore. We have third party evidence, where universities and institutes tracked Apollo (11 - 17). We have the lunar orbiter sending back images of the landing sites. AND we have reflector mirrors set up by astronauts on the moon that we can shine lasers at, receive the laser reflection, and calculate the distance of the moon to the earth. This way we can track how fast the moon is moving away from the earth on a yearly basis.
Don't you think the USSR would have called America out on the moon landing as soon as Apollo 11 happened? Or would have sent their guys to "prove" that Apollo never made it to the moon? These conspiracy theories never add up and the only reason they work on some people is because they confuse the gullible.
The spacecrafts walls (slightly more thickness than a tin can) and space suits could not have protected them against the solar radiation or the extreme temperatures (-250 to +250F).
The position of the lunar lander on the moon changes during the same mission.
The same mountain backdrop is observed during different Apollo missions and landing sites.
No sound of an engine heard over Armstong's headset mic when the Eagle is getting ready to land.
No moon dust disturbed at all when you look under the engine of the lander... there should be dust all over the foot pads of the lander, but they are totally clean.
The pictures of the astronauts and objects are casting diverging shadows... that doesn't happen with one light source that is very far away (sun).
Critical observation/thinking leads me to believe the whole thing was bogus.
-
The spacecraft (slightly more thickness than a tin can) and space suits could not have protected them against the solar radiation or the extreme temperatures (-250 to +250F).
The position of the lunar lander on the moon changes during the same mission.
The same mountain backdrop is observed during different Apollo missions and landing sites.
No sound of an engine heard over Armstong's headset mic when the Eagle is getting ready to land.
No moon dust disturbed at all when you look under the engine of the lander... there should be dust all over the foot pads of the lander, but they are totally clean.
The pictures of the astronauts and objects are casting diverging shadows... that doesn't happen with one light source that is very far away (sun).
Critical observation/thinking leads me to believe the whole thing was bogus.
If you think it was bogus you have no critical thinking.
-
If you think it was bogus you have no critical thinking.
Believe what you will.
-
I told you cucks the earth is FLAT. Once again Wiggs with this right you are wrong.
-
Believe what you will.
Took me a long time to realize that there are people who willfully refuse to educate themselves. Like Coach and his anti-intellectualism bent. Slow learner. :-\
-
Took me a long time to realize that there are people who willfully refuse to educate themselves. Like Coach and his anti-intellectualism bent. Slow learner. :-\
This post means nothing. A good debater does not name call, they should be able to take what I've posted here and disprove those points one at a time. Please do so.
-
This post means nothing. A good debater does not name call, they should be able to take what I've posted here and disprove those points one at a time. Please do so.
Says the guy who posted 'believe what you will.' You just prove my point again. Would it kill you to pick up a book? Rethink something?
-
-
Says the guy who posted 'believe what you will.' You just prove my point again. Would it kill you to pick up a book? Rethink something?
Obfuscation is not an argument. Telling me to pick up a book is not a debate. Come back when you have something more solid.
-
Obfuscation is not an argument. Telling me to pick up a book is not a debate. Come back when you have something more solid.
'Pick up a book' is a hope. Your tacit refusal is acknowledged.
-
'Pick up a book' is a hope. Your tacit refusal is acknowledged.
No rebuttal to anything I've posted here, just nonsense and name calling. Weak. Must be a liberal.
-
The spacecrafts walls (slightly more thickness than a tin can) and space suits could not have protected them against the solar radiation or the extreme temperatures (-250 to +250F).
1. prove that wall thickness is so small?
2. prove that metall wall cant protect from radiation?
The position of the lunar lander on the moon changes during the same mission.
Evidence? Do you even know the word?
The same mountain backdrop is observed during different Apollo missions and landing sites.
Childish bullshit from idiot, who really blindly believe all that crap without any evidence? You still don't know the word, and the meaning of it?
No sound of an engine heard over Armstong's headset mic when the Eagle is getting ready to land.
What kind of sound you can make in the vacuum of space? Nothing.
No moon dust disturbed at all when you look under the engine of the lander... there should be dust all over the foot pads of the lander, but they are totally clean.
What kind of dust you can blow when there is no air to use to blow anything?
The pictures of the astronauts and objects are casting diverging shadows... that doesn't happen with one light source that is very far away (sun).
Why all these childish claims all over again, while every claim what foil hats have ever present, are proved to be bullshit? The surface of the moon wasn't completely flat, so shadows seem to be diverging. Still, there is bunch of photos taken on earth where you see just same kind of shadows, so there isn't any magic in that. Just stupidity of the foil hat morons. Why don't you tell me how come there is only one shadow per object, while there isn't such a spotlight which would be powerful enough to light all those pictures so perfectly. You can measure amount of light from the pictures of the NASA, and nearest object which would give such light, is extraterrestrial sunlight.
Critical observation/thinking leads me to believe the whole thing was bogus.
You read that crap from the foil hat morons web site and call it thinking? There isn't even a bit of your own thoughts in that crap you wrote, everything is copied from the writings of the moon hoax imbeciles. You morons are so fucking dump that it make me puke. For example, in the Apollo program they launch 17 vehicles to the sky, all public with lots of spectators, and 10 of those were manned flights. In your theory, when vehicle has been launch from the Cape Canaveral, where it went? All those vehicles were +30 meters tall, white and obviously clearly visible with any telescope on earth, so where they went hiding? There were hundred of thousands of people witnessing each launch at the scene, and millions by Live - TV, so we know they were launched. They rise to the sky and went where? Moon is the nearest object, did they go behind it to hide? Some how it doesn't add up, so please, explain this simple thing to me?
-
Ropo again schooles the retards
-
I told you cucks the earth is FLAT. Once again Wiggs with this right you are wrong.
Right once again? Like you were right about nigiru and the other 9 times you predicted the end of the world??
-
1. prove that wall thickness is so small?
2. prove that metall wall cant protect from radiation?
Evidence? Do you even know the word?
Childish bullshit from idiot, who really blindly believe all that crap without any evidence? You still don't know the word, and the meaning of it?
What kind of sound you can make in the vacuum of space? Nothing.
What kind of dust you can blow when there is no air to use to blow anything?
Why all these childish claims all over again, while every claim what foil hats have ever present, are proved to be bullshit? The surface of the moon wasn't completely flat, so shadows seem to be diverging. Still, there is bunch of photos taken on earth where you see just same kind of shadows, so there isn't any magic in that. Just stupidity of the foil hat morons. Why don't you tell me how come there is only one shadow per object, while there isn't such a spotlight which would be powerful enough to light all those pictures so perfectly. You can measure amount of light from the pictures of the NASA, and nearest object which would give such light, is extraterrestrial sunlight.
You read that crap from the foil hat morons web site and call it thinking? There isn't even a bit of your own thoughts in that crap you wrote, everything is copied from the writings of the moon hoax imbeciles. You morons are so fucking dump that it make me puke. For example, in the Apollo program they launch 17 vehicles to the sky, all public with lots of spectators, and 10 of those were manned flights. In your theory, when vehicle has been launch from the Cape Canaveral, where it went? All those vehicles were +30 meters tall, white and obviously clearly visible with any telescope on earth, so where they went hiding? There were hundred of thousands of people witnessing each launch at the scene, and millions by Live - TV, so we know they were launched. They rise to the sky and went where? Moon is the nearest object, did they go behind it to hide? Some how it doesn't add up, so please, explain this simple thing to me?
You prove nothing. Pathetic reasoning here. Just more nonsense and name calling.
Yes, the rockets went into space... but only into earth orbit and no further.
It's fun pressing your buttons too. You get so emotional and angry -lol
-
We all have believes that do not base on facts. We all have stupid believes which we would defend illogically. The strength of reality testing module in our brains differ, some are more prone to believe crazy stuff. Even high IQ people aren't safe.
-
Not sure if srs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_rover
Yes, because we had the technology for remote controlled vehicles of modern standard more than 50 years ago, the very same decade when regression analysis was performed by hand calculations. ::)
-
I told you cucks the earth is FLAT. Once again Wiggs with this right you are wrong.
As a fellow physicist, could you care to explain why and if the other planets are flat as well? Don't use big words, I'm quite dumb.
-
(http://i68.tinypic.com/9tlm9v.jpg)
How do you fake a pic like this with early 1970s technology?
-
I think I found a new pic of Wiggs.
(https://i.sli.mg/EE3W8F.jpg)
-
There is a fixed mirror on the surface of the moon with public coordinates, anyone can verify its existence by calibrating a laser towards that mirror. With a detector you will be able to detect the laser beam as it strikes the mirror and bounces back to earth, had it not existed you wouldn't have detected anything as there would be nothing to reflect the beam back to you. Who installed it on the moon if no man have been there? ???
All these laymen "experts" thinking they have it all figured out. The moon landing hoax is on the same level of stupidity as flat earth theorists. Any physicist, or undergraduate engineering student for that matter, would be able to understand why every point made by these conspirators are void.
In addition I have personally met and conversed with the engineer who designed the system that relayed the video back to Earth...
-
In addition I have personally met and conversed with the engineer who designed the system that relayed the video back to Earth...
Lies! Clearly the man is a paid actor who pretends to be an engineer even after 47 years. Any actual parts, pictures or logs he might show you are props created by Hollywood, just like the moon landing. FACT!
I walked up the street today and could see 400 yards ahead perfectly straight and level! Where is your spherical earth now? Obviously the earth is flat. It says so in the bible. FACT. You fancy so called "scientists" think you know things better than a delusional unemployed hebrew!
-
Lies! Clearly the man is a paid actor who pretends to be an engineer even after 47 years. Any actual parts, pictures or logs he might show you are props created by Hollywood, just like the moon landing. FACT!
I walked up the street today and could see 400 yards ahead perfectly straight and level! Where is your spherical earth now? Obviously the earth is flat. It says so in the bible. FACT. You fancy so called "scientists" think you know things better than a delusional unemployed hebrew!
Curse your facts!!
-
In addition I have personally met and conversed with the engineer who designed the system that relayed the video back to Earth...
You obviously talked to a trained actor. This actor also holds a degree in systems engineering. ::)
-
You prove nothing. Pathetic reasoning here. Just more nonsense and name calling.
Yes, the rockets went into space... but only into earth orbit and no further.
It's fun pressing your buttons too. You get so emotional and angry -lol
As poor as it is, as pathetic my reasoning is, the fact is that you can't prove anything you claim, and furthermore, you can't even answer my pathetic questions. It has never happen. You have never been able to prove me wrong, and everyone here knows it. If you ask anybody, that is the most pathetic thing you can possibly do. If I am such a stupid, it would be easy thing to do to prove me wrong, but you don't dare even try because you know you have no evidence at all. You are just a moron who blindly believe that conspiracy crap, and only thing which would cure your stupidity, is bullet in the head.
For example: "Yes, the rockets went into space... but only into earth orbit and no further." shows how fucking stupid moron you are. First you statement is that no one have been in space, now all those 17 vehicles have reach the orbit, which is...in space. They went no further...why? The hardest part of the journey is done in the earth atmosphere, everything is easy after that: no gravity, no air resistance etc.? Why stay at orbit, where you are exposed to radiation and such just like outer space? You don't have answers as usual, but the real question remains: at the orbit all those vehicles would be clearly visible, because there isn't anything where to hide, so how come no one wasn't filming those to prove, that Americans are lying? Even the Sputnik was visible to naked eye, and it was tiny little ball, size like a basketball, so how there isn't thousands of pictures of these large vehicles at the orbit? All would be visible to the russians, to china, to cuba and everybody who care to watch, and there isn't even one prove it happen like you say? Strange.. But how about this:
(https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg)https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg (https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg)
There you have moon landing vehicle without any tin foil. As you see, it have quite strong structure beneath the outer layer, which is only for protecting instruments and fuel- and electric lines etc. which are outside the cabinet. That golden tin foil which never stops to amaze the foil hats is there to protect things to heat and cold, and it is also a good protection against radiation. As you see, there is no miracles, just elementary physics and technologies put to use. But what you idiots will see is the pictures from the moon, where the outer layer is exposed to temperatures you cannot even understand, and those aluminium sheets look odd to you fools. Why? Because you have no brains. That vehicle is on the moon surface, where temperatures at night is -180°C and during daytime + 100°C. That means 280°C difference temperatures during a day, so what that do to any metal, for example aluminium? Have you never heard about thermal expansion? Well, here you see what it does:
(http://images.flatworldknowledge.com/ketchen/ketchen-fig02_x003.jpg)http://images.flatworldknowledge.com/ketchen/ketchen-fig02_x003.jpg (http://images.flatworldknowledge.com/ketchen/ketchen-fig02_x003.jpg)
All the outer layer sheet metals are bended by thermal expansion..what a miracle..for foil hat imbeciles at least ..
Do you get me emotional and angry? Not at all. It is just same if I heard a dog barking, infant crying or foil hat moron yelling, it make no difference in my life. You act like an idiot, I talk you like I talk to the idiot, it is so simple ;D
-
Obfuscation is not an argument. Telling me to pick up a book is not a debate. Come back when you have something more solid.
And what solid you have ever have except your constipation? Just rumors and lies, and foil hat bullshit.
-
Strange.. But how about this:
(https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg)https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg (https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/images/stories/LTAInspect.jpg)
Ironically for Wiggs and his ilk, there appear to be 2 black people (not Hebrews or dindus) working on the Lunar module.
-
I told you cucks the earth is FLAT. Once again Wiggs with this right you are wrong.
And if we make a scale by IQ about the different group of people etc., it goes like this:
1. Average humans 100 +
2. Humans below average - 100
3. Religious people ~70
4. Apes - 70
5. Dogs + 60
6. Cats +55
7. Mentally handicapped people + 50
8. Foil hat morons because they are religious people with the mental handicap -50
9. Flat earthers, because they are religious and mentally handicapped foil hat morons -40 IQ points.
-
And if we make a scale by IQ about the different group of people etc., it goes like this:
1. Average humans 100 +
2. Humans below average - 100
3. Religious people ~70
4. Apes - 70
5. Dogs + 60
6. Cats +55
7. Mentally handicapped people + 50
8. Foil hat morons because they are religious people with the mental handicap -50
9. Flat earthers, because they are religious and mentally handicapped foil hat morons -40 IQ points.
Average humans 100 by definition..... ::)