Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 20, 2016, 04:24:51 PM
-
Clinton's debate reference to nuclear response rekindles judgement criticisms
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/20/clintons-debate-reference-to-nuclear-response-time-raises-eyebrows.html
Although not nearly as damaging as debunked groping allegations ::)
-
From the article:
"Whether the four minutes is accurate or not, anything having to do with response capability is generally classified," Dan Maguire, a former strategic planner with Africom, and with 46 years combined service, told Fox News. "She has a tendency to use previous access and her position as secretary (of state) to give an appearance of knowledge to show she has the answers, rather than protect the information."
The reference to a four-minute timeline between the order and the launch was seen by former intelligence officers and military operatives as a possible violation of operational security, known as OPSEC.
Do you really expect Clinton to care about classified information and actually keeping it classified - or to be held accountable for this?
-
I'm surprised she gave away that information for free.
-
From the article:
Do you really expect Clinton to care about classified information and actually keeping it classified - or to be held accountable for this?
Exactly. It's been pretty firmly established that she has no regard for keeping classified info classified