Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2016, 10:07:23 AM

Title: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2016, 10:07:23 AM
Who would have won if a 93 version of Dorian faced a 98 version of Ronnie?

Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2016, 10:08:09 AM
.

Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2016, 10:12:54 AM
.

Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Iceman1981 on December 12, 2016, 10:14:20 AM
Bro, we already had this thread. Do a search for it. Oh, Ronnie would win  ;D
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 12, 2016, 10:18:09 AM
Bro, we already had this thread. Do a search for it. Oh, Ronnie would win  ;D

I was around for the entire saga bro. Not a newbie here ;-). Just felt inspired to create this thread because I was bored.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 12, 2016, 10:20:03 AM
'98 Ronnie still didn't look totally filled out size-wise like we know him... I'd say he didn't achieve that until '99.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Grape Ape on December 12, 2016, 10:21:13 AM
Bro, we already had this thread. Do a search for it. Oh, Ronnie would win  ;D

Agree 100%, except for the Ronnie winning part.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: French on December 12, 2016, 10:23:44 AM
Dorian,  of course.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Skeletor on December 12, 2016, 10:28:18 AM
1993 Dorian.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: illuminati on December 12, 2016, 02:03:13 PM
Dorian. End of.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Iceman1981 on December 12, 2016, 02:58:15 PM
I was around for the entire saga bro. Not a newbie here ;-). Just felt inspired to create this thread because I was bored.

You should of "bumped" that thread and not create a new one if you felt bored.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: light weight baby on December 12, 2016, 03:23:12 PM
not this shit again

RDC destroys that pathetic white man
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: illuminati on December 12, 2016, 04:16:05 PM

RDC destroys that pathetic white man


Please Tell Me How Many Times That Pathetic White Man
Was Ajudged To Have Lost To RDC..???

And just stick to The Facts.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: delta9mda on December 12, 2016, 04:25:28 PM

Please Tell Me How Many Times That Pathetic White Man
Was Ajudged To Have Lost To RDC..???

And just stick to The Facts.
whooooooooooooshowned
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Matt on December 12, 2016, 04:27:23 PM
not this shit again

RDC destroys that pathetic white man

Absolutely.  I couldn't agree more.

PS - racist post reported.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Skeletor on December 12, 2016, 04:53:40 PM

Please Tell Me How Many Times That Pathetic White Man
Was Ajudged To Have Lost To RDC..???

And just stick to The Facts.

Just for the Olympia:

1992 Olympia: Dorian 1st, Ronnie 16th
1994 Olympia: Dorian 1st, Ronnie 15th
1995 Olympia: Dorian 1st, Ronnie 11th
1996 Olympia: Dorian 1st, Ronnie 6th
1997 Olympia: Dorian 1st, Ronnie 9th

It is interesting to note that Ronnie made his pro debut in 1992, just 2 years after Dorian's.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2016, 05:10:16 PM
Ronnie himself stated that Dorian would have still won.  Case closed.  
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: light weight baby on December 12, 2016, 05:28:44 PM
Ronnie himself stated that Dorian would have still won.  Case closed.  
if he really said that he was just being nice but not truthful
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Zillotch on December 12, 2016, 05:36:19 PM
Dorian
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: oldschoolfan on December 12, 2016, 05:42:17 PM
dorian
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Nirvana on December 12, 2016, 06:08:43 PM
What about 1999 Ronnie VS 1995 Dorian? Or 2001 ASC Ronnie vs 1996 German Grand Prix Dorian? 2007 Ronnie vs 1981 Dorian?
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2016, 06:17:40 PM
What about 1999 Ronnie VS 1995 Dorian? Or 2001 ASC Ronnie vs 1996 German Grand Prix Dorian? 2007 Ronnie vs 1981 Dorian?

1996 German Gran Prix Dorian crushes everyone at anytime.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: oldschoolfan on December 12, 2016, 06:23:29 PM
1996 German Gran Prix Dorian crushes everyone at anytime.

dorian looked pretty dominating there.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Pet shop boys on December 12, 2016, 06:42:25 PM
Ronnie

( I've been around since Lee Haney's 5th Mr.O win )


WoooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Hypo on December 12, 2016, 07:13:50 PM
not this shit again

RDC destroys that pathetic white man

That's one white man's opinion.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: The Scott on December 12, 2016, 07:19:20 PM
Other than arms, Dorian is superior.  And again, I am no fan of either but in all honesty there really is no comparison between these two.  Dorian is better.  Haney is too.  Paris too. Zane too.  And many more.   

And of course, Arnold is vastly superior in every single way.  I think that the Olympia judges of Coleman were just scatological morons and therefor could not help but be mesmerized by the world's largest and only (barely) ambulatory pile of crap. Bunch of flies.

Or dung beetles.  Kind of like that South Park episode about the guys from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy being Crab People.

"We are Dung Beetles!  We are Dung Beetles!"
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Rimstinger on December 12, 2016, 07:27:06 PM
The king
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Iceman1981 on December 12, 2016, 08:31:57 PM
Other than arms, Dorian is superior.  And again, I am no fan of either but in all honesty there really is no comparison between these two.  Dorian is better.  Haney is too.  Paris too. Zane too.  And many more.   

And of course, Arnold is vastly superior in every single way.  I think that the Olympia judges of Coleman were just scatological morons and therefor could not help but be mesmerized by the world's largest and only (barely) ambulatory pile of crap. Bunch of flies.

Or dung beetles.  Kind of like that South Park episode about the guys from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy being Crab People.

"We are Dung Beetles!  We are Dung Beetles!"

Those same judges that judged Dorian also judged Ronnie during both of their Mr. Olympia reigns.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Wiggs on December 12, 2016, 10:14:12 PM
Dorian's at 260 in 93 vs. Ronnie at 252 in 98. Ronnie wis this. He makes Dorian's look blocky. Ronnie beats Dorian in that pose.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2016, 03:23:12 PM
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Grape Ape on December 13, 2016, 08:38:08 PM
Dorian's at 260 in 93 vs. Ronnie at 252 in 98. Ronnie wis this. He makes Dorian's look blocky. Ronnie beats Dorian in that pose.

I think the real numbers were Yates at 257 vs. Coleman at 248

Yates would have made him look smaller with worse conditioning.

Yates wins.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Danimal77 on December 13, 2016, 09:40:08 PM
Dorian's at 260 in 93 vs. Ronnie at 252 in 98. Ronnie wis this. He makes Dorian's look blocky. Ronnie beats Dorian in that pose.

Dorian was 256/257 in 1993 and Ronnie was 248 in 1998. Correct me if I'm wrong on Ronnies weight ND?
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Wiggs on December 13, 2016, 09:43:20 PM
Coleman was 252 for the night show in 98.
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: Bevo on December 14, 2016, 01:06:05 AM
The king

Ronnie has elite hair genetics but decides to go for the bald look  ::)
Title: Re: 1993 Dorian OR 1998 Ronnie?
Post by: honest on December 14, 2016, 02:21:33 AM
dorian 93, structure wise haney better than coleman, ronnie had a lot of muscle he just didn't have the balance and structure of those who came before him, yates, haney, arnold even samir. lot of muscle but just no overall shape to it especially front and side.