Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 05:38:11 AM

Title: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 05:38:11 AM: Every year I am less and less impressed with this guy. The tight waist is cool but he has many weaknesses, and the distension the last two years has been distracting...
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Julio Ceasar on December 29, 2016, 07:39:51 AM: Something is strange about him. Weak back, bad arms! Ugly belly! Bonac Dexter and Ramy is better. Probably Lionel Beyeke to!
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Pet shop boys on December 29, 2016, 08:18:07 AM: Dexter was the runner up .

WooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: mazrim on December 29, 2016, 09:41:19 AM: Nope, Ramy crushed him.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Simple Simon on December 29, 2016, 09:49:48 AM: (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=624075.0;attach=702470;image)
(http://www.muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=39791&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40937&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: JCL on December 29, 2016, 10:52:40 AM: I think Rhoden looks sick.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Parker on December 29, 2016, 10:59:05 AM: Quote from: Be There on December 29, 2016, 09:49:48 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=624075.0;attach=702470;image)
(http://www.muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=39791&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40937&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Rhoden's shape is more Flex Wheeler-sque.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 11:12:44 AM: People always say that, but beyeke is more like flex
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 11:14:03 AM: If any pose is required to be wheeler esque its the bdb. Rhodens sux
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Parker on December 29, 2016, 11:25:27 AM: Quote from: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 11:14:03 AM
If any pose is required to be wheeler esque its the bdb. Rhodens sux
That tends to be the case when you take 7 years off, and hadn't developed a good back before that.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Simple Simon on December 29, 2016, 11:35:57 AM: Quote from: Parker on December 29, 2016, 10:59:05 AM
Rhoden's shape is more Flex Wheeler-sque.

my point was that Cormier never took second place in the Olympia and he shits all over Rhoden.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Skeletor on December 29, 2016, 11:36:44 AM: He always has a sleepy look.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Bevo on December 29, 2016, 12:28:38 PM: Quote from: Be There on December 29, 2016, 11:35:57 AM
my point was that Cormier never took second place in the Olympia and he shits all over Rhoden.

That's a shame too cause he shits all over Rhoden and everyone competing today including dexter
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 12:50:13 PM: Quote from: Parker on December 29, 2016, 11:25:27 AM
That tends to be the case when you take 7 years off, and hadn't developed a good back before that.

2002 nats

(http://mostmuscular.com/2002nationals/namedmengo/shawn-rhoden-02.jpg)
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: light weight baby on December 29, 2016, 01:03:44 PM: your threads are pissing me off
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Rudee on December 29, 2016, 01:07:02 PM: That droopy-eyed fuck got a Gift in 2nd.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Simple Simon on December 29, 2016, 01:12:01 PM: Quote from: light weight baby on December 29, 2016, 01:03:44 PM
your threads are pissing me off

here you go
(https://news-images.vice.com/images/2014/03/17/uganda-s-truck-stop-prostitutes-are-in-africa-s-aids-epicenter-article-body-image-1395075552.jpg)
(http://www.reportghananews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Ghana-News990-653x400.jpg)
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: illuminati on December 29, 2016, 01:26:23 PM: Quote from: Be There on December 29, 2016, 11:35:57 AM
my point was that Cormier never took second place in the Olympia and he shits all over Rhoden.

Good point.
Beats Rhoden hands down.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: d0nny2600 on December 29, 2016, 01:34:24 PM: Dont see the hype with Rhoden. Arms look funky too.

Not in the same league as a prime Cormier.
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Bevo on December 29, 2016, 03:57:47 PM: Quote from: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 12:50:13 PM
2002 nats

(http://mostmuscular.com/2002nationals/namedmengo/shawn-rhoden-02.jpg)

Nothing compared to Chris

(http://tnation.t-nation.com/forum_images/8/6/869287.1136224455548.cc.jpg)
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: ESFitness on December 29, 2016, 04:26:46 PM: Isn't he an ex alcoholic?
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 04:45:23 PM: Quote from: Bevo on December 29, 2016, 03:57:47 PM
Nothing compared to Chris

(http://tnation.t-nation.com/forum_images/8/6/869287.1136224455548.cc.jpg)

Cormier at the end of his career still smokes Rhoden.

(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/69/images/Chris_Cormier_photo89.jpg)
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: V Man on December 29, 2016, 05:34:40 PM: Quote from: Nether Animal on December 29, 2016, 05:38:11 AM
Every year I am less and less impressed with this guy. The tight waist is cool but he has many weaknesses, and the distension the last two years has been distracting...

That's what passes for a tight waist these days?
Title: Re: RHODEN - Was he really good enough for 2nd?
Post by: Henda on December 30, 2016, 01:22:51 AM: Wouldn't be top 6 or even 10 back in 90s