Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: theworm on January 19, 2017, 04:41:24 PM

Title: Found some evidence that blast and cruise may be better:
Post by: theworm on January 19, 2017, 04:41:24 PM
I always thought cycling was better because when I'm off my hdl triples.

Others say it's best to blast and cruise yet give no evidence on why it's better other than the thought that big swings in hormones doesn't seem healthy.

Well I found an article about TRT and in it, it says that people on androgen deprivation for prostate cancer treatment find that no androgens (perhaps like us in Pct ) showed a 2-3 fold increase in heart attacks even as short as 6 months, despite seeing an increase in hdl in those on ADT...

I think I'm starting to lean more to B&C as I read elsewhere that low T increased risk of death even factoring out smoking and obesity etc...

Here's the study:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/770544
Title: Re: Found some evidence that blast and cruise may be better:
Post by: Bulgarian_enforcer on January 20, 2017, 03:47:25 AM
atleast one month off is esential imo.
Title: Re: Found some evidence that blast and cruise may be better:
Post by: Weedlejuice on January 20, 2017, 07:01:58 AM
atleast one month off is esential imo.

Why though? For any reason other than copy/paste info you read on some forum or your personal assumption
Title: Re: Found some evidence that blast and cruise may be better:
Post by: Bulgarian_enforcer on January 20, 2017, 08:23:58 AM
blast all you want, for me I take 4 months off AAS to restard my balls.

I believe time off is needed in the longer run, but who knows. Blood work should be good indicator imo.

i keep the gh year round though.
Title: Re: Found some evidence that blast and cruise may be better:
Post by: Mad-scientist on January 20, 2017, 11:42:01 AM
How long do you stay on before taking a month off?