Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Straw Man on February 16, 2017, 02:46:09 PM

Title: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Straw Man on February 16, 2017, 02:46:09 PM
WTF is with this guy?

From his press conference today

Quote
I guess it was the biggest electoral college win since Ronald Reagan

Is this a deliberate lie (and if so why?) or is he truly this uninformed

which one is worse?

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/donald-trump-falsely-claims-biggest-electoral-win-since-reagan
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: obsidian on February 16, 2017, 02:50:25 PM
You need many years of therapy. And you're going to need drugs - please see a Psychiatrist!
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Straw Man on February 16, 2017, 02:53:28 PM
You need many years of therapy. And you're going to need drugs - please see a Psychiatrist!

I agree that Trump does likely need many years of therapy or probably some serious medication

Do you have any explanation why the President of the United States chooses to tell a blatant lie about a topic that no one (other than him) even cares about

Also makes him look incredibly insecure

Maybe Trump supporters such as yourself find dishonesty and profound insecurity to be appealing qualities
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: obsidian on February 16, 2017, 02:55:31 PM
I agree that Trump does likely need many years of therapy or probably some serious medication

Do you have any explanation why the President of the United States chooses to tell a blatant lie about a topic that no one (other than him) even cares about

Also makes him look incredibly insecure

Maybe Trump supporters such as yourself find dishonesty and profound insecurity to be appealing qualities
Example?
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Straw Man on February 16, 2017, 03:08:29 PM
Example?

of what ?
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Yamcha on February 16, 2017, 04:34:12 PM
(https://i.redd.it/mqh2gi6hbbgy.jpg)
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Yamcha on February 16, 2017, 05:48:01 PM
Trump has no reason to call out the media!
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Nick Danger on February 16, 2017, 05:55:49 PM
Trump has no reason to call out the media!

This is the part you cut off.

"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

"The intelligence community has assessed that in order for this operation to have been executed, it could not have been done without the highest levels of the government, including the President himself."
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Slapper on February 16, 2017, 06:23:40 PM
This is the part you cut off.

"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

"The intelligence community has assessed that in order for this operation to have been executed, it could not have been done without the highest levels of the government, including the President himself."

1. Their previous statement contradicts what they say afterwards, and;

2. Since the ex-CIA director himself said, when he called out the US President in public (which IMHO, he deserved jail time for opening his fucking mouth,) that the President has to choose his words more carefully; wouldn't it make just as much sense, if not more, for them to leak more DEFINITIVE proof on the president of a sovereign foreign nation? To me, it would make a lot more sense to leak a story pointing to an email sent by Putin or a conversation picked up by our intelligence proving that Putin had direct conversations with the people that did the hacking. Instead, they leak a half-assed story showing... nothing. And they expect people to believe and trust what they do?

30,000 foot view, IMHO, the CIA was hell bent on taking the fight to Russia. In comes The Don and spoils their party. Dumb fucks and their senile bosses freak out and start a word of words with the president.

Beautiful.
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Board_SHERIF on February 16, 2017, 07:08:35 PM
This is the part you cut off.

"We don't have Putin's fingerprints on anything or a piece of paper that shows he signed the order, but the nature of the operation was such that this had to be approved by top levels of the Russian government," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence on the hacking told CNN.

"The intelligence community has assessed that in order for this operation to have been executed, it could not have been done without the highest levels of the government, including the President himself."

im sure the cia would only tell cnn the fake news this and nooo one else  ::)
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: TheGrinch on February 16, 2017, 07:19:50 PM
Holy Shit morons..


If Russia was involved in hacking elections TRUMP would have WON the popular vote.. holy fucktards

So Putin only hacked "enough" to have him squeak by in swing states?  ??? ???
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: SOMEPARTS on February 16, 2017, 09:11:04 PM
Holy Shit morons..


If Russia was involved in hacking elections TRUMP would have WON the popular vote.. holy fucktards

So Putin only hacked "enough" to have him squeak by in swing states?  ??? ???




Imagine the vote count if ID was required in all states.
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Nick Danger on February 16, 2017, 09:23:42 PM
Holy Shit morons..


If Russia was involved in hacking elections TRUMP would have WON the popular vote.. holy fucktards

So Putin only hacked "enough" to have him squeak by in swing states?  ??? ???

Nice of you to chime in but  you really haven't been paying attention.

The Russians weren't accused of tampering with ballot boxes, they are accused of manipulating propaganda and hacking information.

There is no proof that their efforts swayed even one vote. The problem is that they tampered with a federal election.
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: TheGrinch on February 16, 2017, 10:47:02 PM
Nice of you to chime in but  you really haven't been paying attention.

The Russians weren't accused of tampering with ballot boxes, they are accused of manipulating propaganda



You mean like CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, LA Times, etc?

You mean like that..?


oh.. ok....


</thread>
Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: Nick Danger on February 17, 2017, 11:04:04 PM

You mean like CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, Washington Post, LA Times, etc?

You mean like that..?


oh.. ok....


</thread>

Nice of you to chime in again but  you really haven't been paying attention.

Title: Re: Fake News Reporter in Chief
Post by: bike nut on February 18, 2017, 02:11:07 PM
8 years of total WINNING!!!!

About half as long as Hillary's forthcoming jail sentence