Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Al Doggity on February 20, 2017, 03:04:08 PM
-
He was disinvited from some conservative conference and Fox News is speculating that Breitbart is going to get rid of him.
-
I don't believe for one second that Milo supports pedophilia. Milo is becoming quite powerful so a lot of people are trying to destroy his reputation and silence him.
Don't fall for the smear campaign.
-
-
2017 Republican party
time for you nancys to clutch your pearls its going to be a bumpy ride
(http://cdn0.dailydot.com/cache/9a/2b/9a2be3c98bd6578db773cab2ae64b52d.jpg)
-
I don't believe for one second that Milo supports pedophilia. Milo is becoming quite powerful so a lot of people are trying to destroy his reputation and silence him.
Don't fall for the smear campaign.
I think you're half-right. The original interview with Joe Rogan was from a year ago but only came up in the last couple days as people look for dirt on the guy.
-
So we are going to hang the disgusting pedo-cesspool of Hollywood around Milo's neck because he doesn't want to name names and open himself up to lawsuits from uber-power, uber-wealthy people?
As far as the shit that happened to him as a teen, we obviously are getting a cheeky version of events there.
What's being lost in all this is that the dude is an entertainer. It's his job to say crazy shit for laughs and ruffle people's feathers. Should we comb through all the disgusting shit that Sarah Silverman has said over the years and treat that as her literal belief system? I think not.
This is an attempt to dig up dirt and destroy a reputation. More phony outrage that just coincidentally benefits certain people with certain political and religious views namely liberals and hard-core conservatives. I'm not falling for it.
-
I think you're half-right. The original interview with Joe Rogan was from a year ago but only came up in the last couple days as people look for dirt on the guy.
He's only starting to gain mainstream recognition, so his background would just start going under the microscope. He did a lot of backtracking and talking in circles, but the big takeaways for me were that he didn't think there was anything wrong with sex or sexual attraction between teens and adults, he considered himself the sexual predator when he was 15 and had a sexual relationship with an adult priest and he considered it a great experience. I guess it's up to personal interpretation, but this sounds like someone who is justifying teen/adult sex. He pegs his age as 14 when he was involved with the priest.
-
So we are going to hang the disgusting pedo-cesspool of Hollywood around Milo's neck because he doesn't want to name names and open himself up to lawsuits from uber-power, uber-wealthy people?
As far as the shit that happened to him as a teen, we obviously are getting a cheeky version of events there.
What's being lost in all this is that the dude is an entertainer. It's his job to say crazy shit for laughs and ruffle people's feathers. Should we comb through all the disgusting shit that Sarah Silverman has said over the years and treat that as her literal belief system? I think not.
This is an attempt to dig up dirt and destroy a reputation. More phony outrage that just coincidentally benefits certain people with certain political and religious views namely liberals and hard-core conservatives. I'm not falling for it.
Very plausible.
He did offer a lengthy explanation and it does makes sense as he offers context to his comments, especially the meaning of "boy" during his conversation. It almost seems as if he's talking about older gay men banging on young gay men.
-
Damn liberal cuckolds are trying everything to stop the Trump era!
-
Literally never heard of this guy until last week.
-
Somebody else will pick up the book.
I like some of the shit he says, but then he defends religion ( make up your fucking mind dude are you a fucking Jew or Catholic? Wtf)... claiming that morals and ethics come from Christian / Catholic religions... As if the millions of people in Asia 3000 years ago for thousand years ago 5000 years ago had no idea what the fuck right or wrong was before the Christians invaded their country and tried to convert them. As if china was full of imoral/unethical Buddhists and Taoists.
Christianity is cancer.
-
Funny how homophobic individuals in the past used to this same path to demonize gays... now it is being used by the tolerant left to take down Milo (successfully it seems).
Seems like Milo's mouth wrote a check his ass can't cash this time. What a shame... ::)
The real shame is the fact that we have much more graphic evidence of pedophilia surrounding highly influential people in Washington DC and we can't even get a legitimate investigation.
Fuck pedophilia and those trying to normalize it.
(https://kek.gg/i/5HhCGv)(http://www.rapeable.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/MILO_SF.jpg)
-
Lena Dunham admits to molesting her sister multiple time and she's the toast of the town!
-
I'm also confused on his religion he says he's a Jew the also says he's catholic. And yea I was wondering how I missed the joe Rogan podcast bring how I'm subscribed to it... it's over a fucking year old
-
I'm also confused on his religion he says he's a Jew the also says he's catholic. And yea I was wondering how I missed the joe Rogan podcast bring how I'm subscribed to it... it's over a fucking year old
Joe has had him on twice
-
If Milo was a liberal this would never be happening to him. Even if it did, the left would defend him to the end.
This is a fake scandal.
-
If Milo was is a liberalconservative this would i will never be let this happening to him. Even if it did, the left would i will defend him to the end.
This is a fake scandal.
-
Hey shit-rat, when have I ever favored censorship of any speech, liberal or conservative.
Let me help you out.....FUCKING NEVER.
-
So we are going to hang the disgusting pedo-cesspool of Hollywood around Milo's neck because he doesn't want to name names and open himself up to lawsuits from uber-power, uber-wealthy people?
As far as the shit that happened to him as a teen, we obviously are getting a cheeky version of events there.
What's being lost in all this is that the dude is an entertainer. It's his job to say crazy shit for laughs and ruffle people's feathers. Should we comb through all the disgusting shit that Sarah Silverman has said over the years and treat that as her literal belief system? I think not.
This is an attempt to dig up dirt and destroy a reputation. More phony outrage that just coincidentally benefits certain people with certain political and religious views namely liberals and hard-core conservatives. I'm not falling for it.
Out of interest, what has this turd said?
-
If Milo was a liberal this would never be happening to him. Even if it did, the left would defend him to the end.
This is a fake scandal.
... but CPAC pulled his invite ???
-
... but CPAC pulled his invite ???
Conservatives are (mostly) pussies and they hate fags. I'm surprised they invited him in the first place.
-
... but CPAC pulled his invite ???
This surfaces now BECAUSE many conservatives did not want him at CPAC. There are no coincidences.
-
I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.
I would like to restate my utter disgust at adults who sexually abuse minors. I am horrified by pedophilia and I have devoted large portions of my career as a journalist to exposing child abusers. I've outed three of them, in fact -- three more than most of my critics. And I've repeatedly expressed disgust at pedophilia in my feature and opinion writing. My professional record is very clear.
But I do understand that these videos, even though some of them are edited deceptively, paint a different picture.
I'm partly to blame. My own experiences as a victim led me to believe I could say anything I wanted to on this subject, no matter how outrageous. But I understand that my usual blend of British sarcasm, provocation and gallows humor might have come across as flippancy, a lack of care for other victims or, worse, "advocacy." I deeply regret that. People deal with things from their past in different ways.
As to some of the specific claims being made, sometimes things tumble out of your mouth on these long, late-night live-streams, when everyone is spit-balling, that are incompletely expressed or not what you intended. Nonetheless, I've reviewed the tapes that appeared last night in their proper full context and I don't believe they say what is being reported.
I do not advocate for illegal behavior. I explicitly say on the tapes that I think the current age of consent is "about right."
I do not believe sex with 13-year-olds is okay. When I mentioned the number 13, I was talking about the age I lost my own virginity.
I shouldn't have used the word "boy" -- which gay men often do to describe young men of consenting age -- instead of "young man." That was an error.
I am certainly guilty of imprecise language, which I regret.
Anyone who suggests I turn a blind eye to illegal activity or to the abuse of minors is unequivocally wrong. I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia and I will continue to report and speak accordingly.
Previous statement: https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905 (https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905)
-
It was a stupid thing for Milo to have said knowing the position that he's in.
However, I don't even think the comments he made are hugely outrageous either. I remember Tim Forgarty making similar remarks once on this board. It is probably a common belief among gay men.
-
"Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime." - Lavrentiy Beria (speaking to Joseph Stalin)
-
Lol The GOP and their "standards"
Bash Gays? OK
Bash Muslims? OK
Bash immigrants? OK
Bash Tannies? OK
Bash Blacks? OK
Bash Jews? OK
Bash Women? OK
Say nice things about Pedos? NO NO NO, We have standards in the GOP. Hahaha. What a fucking group of cocks.
-
(https://i.redd.it/0vkmbuska8hy.png)
-
Looks like the cocksukker just got FIRED.... ERRRR resigned from his day job
http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/21/media/milo-yiannopoulos-downfall/ (http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/21/media/milo-yiannopoulos-downfall/)
(https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2016/04/RTX1GZCO/lead_960.jpg?1461074059)
-
The gay community is a hot bed of pedophilia. They like em REAL YOUNG.
Having said that, I think Milo is a victim of abuse.
-
(https://i.redd.it/0vkmbuska8hy.png)
What
The
Fuck??
-
any pics of milo's bf?
-
Sexual abuse of a 13 year old is all good for liberals. George didn't think it was rape because he thought the older guy was attractive. Go to 2:20. Everyone just yucking it up. Great times.
This reminds me of something else I heard about recently but I can't quite place it. Hmmmm.
-
-
Sexual abuse of a 13 year old is all good for liberals. George didn't think it was rape because he thought the older guy was attractive. Go to 2:20. Everyone just yucking it up. Great times.
This reminds me of something else I heard about recently but I can't quite place it. Hmmmm.
"They do it, too!" you mean. Right? So leave OUR pedos alone and stuff?
This is really your concern. Not that fucking kids is sorta wrong. Good job.
-
DISGUSTING mudshark, kiddie-fucker FAG. >:(
(http://www.infostormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Milo-628x356.jpg)
(http://wp.production.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/files/2017/02/milo2.png)
-
You may have forgotten milo dislikes republicans and is primarily a trump supporter, not a republican supporter.
$3 says Judith Regan publishes the book instead
-
any pics of milo's bf?
(http://bartuitterhaegen.com/onewebstatic/245e3868be-DSC02549.jpg)
-
Just a young idiot who thought he could ride angry Conservative coattails to the love he never had. No worries. Somebody will give this shitstain a ride. Guaranteed.
-
Milo can go fuck himself and his AIDS ridden annus.
-
gonna cost milo alot financialy for sure
-
Queers are disgusting perverts whether on the left or the right.
-
He's only starting to gain mainstream recognition, so his background would just start going under the microscope. He did a lot of backtracking and talking in circles, but the big takeaways for me were that he didn't think there was anything wrong with sex or sexual attraction between teens and adults, he considered himself the sexual predator when he was 15 and had a sexual relationship with an adult priest and he considered it a great experience. I guess it's up to personal interpretation, but this sounds like someone who is justifying teen/adult sex. He pegs his age as 14 when he was involved with the priest.
Well, people justify homosexual relationship. Its the same.
-
"They do it, too!" you mean. Right? So leave OUR pedos alone and stuff?
This is really your concern. Not that fucking kids is sorta wrong. Good job.
Wrong. Simply exposing hypocrisy. Selective outrage, fake outrage.
Your argument is illogical and I believe dishonest.
-
any pics of milo's bf?
You will not find any pics of Milo with Vince G.
-
Wrong. Simply exposing hypocrisy. Selective outrage, fake outrage.
Your argument is illogical and I believe dishonest.
Nah, perfectly logical. And I believe your argument is - as all your arguments are - 100% partisan stoogery.
-
Nah, perfectly logical. And I believe your argument is - as all your arguments are - 100% partisan stoogery.
Mischaracterizing someone's position as a way to discredit them is a well known tactic.
*If someone says that we should enforce our immigration law they are labeled a racist.
*If they challenge any assertions made by feminists then they are labeled a misogynist.
*If they talk about the many instances of Islamic terrorism then they are labeled islamaphobic.
*If they disagree with gay marriage they are labeled homophobic.
The good news is, people are getting wise to that bullshit and they aren't falling for it anymore. You and your people are liars and you cried wolf too many times.
-
Mischaracterizing someone's position as a way to discredit them is a well known tactic.
*If someone says that we should enforce our immigration law they are labeled a racist.
*If they challenge any assertions made by feminists then they are labeled a misogynist.
*If they talk about the many instances of Islamic terrorism then they are labeled islamaphobic.
*If they disagree with gay marriage they are labeled homophobic.
The good news is, people are getting wise to that bullshit and they aren't falling for it anymore. You and your people are liars and you cried wolf too many times.
A young boy, the mouthfucking priest - your points here are all so relevant and irrefutable, how could I possibly argue? Not a single straw man, even.
In over my head, bro. Had no clue you were all learned and whatnot.
-
Mischaracterizing someone's position as a way to discredit them is a well known tactic.
*If someone says that we should enforce our immigration law they are labeled a racist.
*If they challenge any assertions made by feminists then they are labeled a misogynist.
*If they talk about the many instances of Islamic terrorism then they are labeled islamaphobic.
*If they disagree with gay marriage they are labeled homophobic.
The good news is, people are getting wise to that bullshit and they aren't falling for it anymore. You and your people are liars and you cried wolf too many times.
Mischaracterizing him? He literally said "we get hung up on this child sexual abuse stuff." Really? Get hung up on it? I guess it's not an important topic to him. Further, he said he gives good oral because he learned as a minor giving oral to a priest. Creepy statement. These are statements from milos. How can you even defend this? Because he's a republican?
-
Mischaracterizing someone's position as a way to discredit them is a well known tactic.
*If someone says that we should enforce our immigration law they are labeled a racist.
*If they challenge any assertions made by feminists then they are labeled a misogynist.
*If they talk about the many instances of Islamic terrorism then they are labeled islamaphobic.
*If they disagree with gay marriage they are labeled homophobic.
The good news is, people are getting wise to that bullshit and they aren't falling for it anymore. You and your people are liars and you cried wolf too many times.
Liberals going to lib-el.
-
A young boy, the mouthfucking priest - your points here are all so relevant and irrefutable, how could I possibly argue? Not a single straw man, even.
In over my head, bro. Had no clue you were all learned and whatnot.
Strawman? lol That's exactly what is happening.
"Trump is literally Hitler", "Milo is a White Nationalist", blah blah blah. All fucking day.
-
Mischaracterizing him? He literally said "we get hung up on this child sexual abuse stuff." Really? Get hung up on it? I guess it's not an important topic to him. Further, he said he gives good oral because he learned as a minor giving oral to a priest. Creepy statement. These are statements from milos. How can you even defend this? Because he's a republican?
You should really watch Milo's apologetic yet defiant press conference.
How can I defend it? I stand up for free speech. I've spent a lot of time watching and listening to Milo (which most of his critics have not) and I think I have a pretty good feel for the context in which all this stuff was said. I stand up for Milo, I stand up for liberal twats that I hate like Howard Stern and Bill Maher. Anyone who doesn't like it or wants to attribute a different motive like partisanship can go right ahead. Knock yourself out.
When you're job is to say crazy shit and piss people off for entertainment (and also to make people think) then occasional you are going to overstep, or mis-speak. I give people latitude with their words and I give them an opportunity to clarify when they say something stupid or questionable. Look at all the stupid crazy I say on Getbig, what kind of a hypocrite would I be if I got outraged about Milo-fucking-Yiannopoulos? It's not always easy to be precise on a 4 hour podcast with Joe Rogan. I certainly don't jump to label someone a pedophile over some comments especially when they were the victim and not the perpetrator. That disgusting fat twat Lena Dunham openly discussed molesting her sister. Nobody gave a fuck. She didn't lose her job. She a darling of the left.
I'm merely trying to point out that not much in this world is what it appears to be. There are a lot of fake people out there pretending to be outraged. Making mountains out of molehills while simultaneously ignoring real issues, vastly more serious issues. This was a targeted hit on Milo because the left loves identity politics and he was problematic for them. They think a gay jew who loves black cock should be on their side. He pointed out a lot of their hypocrisy and so he has to go. I'm not falling for it, period. Very simple.
-
You should really watch Milo's apologetic yet defiant press conference.
How can I defend it? I stand up for free speech. I've spent a lot of time watching and listening to Milo (which most of his critics have not) and I think I have a pretty good feel for the context in which all this stuff was said. I stand up for Milo, I stand up for liberal twats that I hate like Howard Stern and Bill Maher. Anyone who doesn't like it or wants to attribute a different motive like partisanship can go right ahead. Knock yourself out.
When you're job is to say crazy shit and piss people off for entertainment (and also to make people think) then occasional you are going to overstep, or mis-speak. I give people latitude with their words and I give them an opportunity to clarify when they say something stupid or questionable. Look at all the stupid crazy I say on Getbig, what kind of a hypocrite would I be if I got outraged about Milo-fucking-Yiannopoulos? It's not always easy to be precise on a 4 hour podcast with Joe Rogan. I certainly don't jump to label someone a pedophile over some comments especially when they were the victim and not the perpetrator. That disgusting fat twat Lena Dunham openly discussed molesting her sister. Nobody gave a fuck. She didn't lose her job. She a darling of the left.
I'm merely trying to point out that not much in this world is what it appears to be. There are a lot of fake people out there pretending to be outraged. Making mountains out of molehills while simultaneously ignoring real issues, vastly more serious issues. This was a targeted hit on Milo because the left loves identity politics and he was problematic for them. They think a gay jew who loves black cock should be on their side. He pointed out a lot of their hypocrisy and so he has to go. I'm not falling for it, period. Very simple.
Exactly my thoughts, well said.
-
He was sexually assaulted as a child by a pedo, he outed three pedos and is being accused of pedo propaganda - that`s just mental that anyone falls for this anti-Milo crap still...
Twisting the truth, taking things out of context, fullblown media attack campaign and discreditation with continuous repetition of the aforementioned lies is not a new tactic from the "liberal" side.
-
He's sweating and forgetting to troll, which is his raisin detra. Now is an opportune time for him to forward my 'the punishment for rape should depend on the size of the penis used' proposal.
So sure am I that I guarantee twice the provocation or your money back.
-
Twisting the truth, taking things out of context, fullblown media attack campaign and discreditation with continuous repetition of the aforementioned lies is not a new tactic from the "liberal" side.
Exactly. Not a new tactic. It's right out of their playbook. It's so transparent that I'm amazed so many people fell for it.
-
Right now many of us know US politics and media is hotbed of pedos. Hopefully Milo mans up and starts naming names.
He should name these high level Hollywood directors he says he saw having unprotected sex with VERY YOUNG boys.
-
The snuffed ones at least. I mean come on.
-
Right now many of us know US politics and media is hotbed of pedos. Hopefully Milo mans up and starts naming names.
He should name these high level Hollywood directors he says he saw having unprotected sex with VERY YOUNG boys.
I would fucking love it if these Hollywood monsters got taken down. It's been a long time coming for some of these pieces of shit.
-
Mischaracterizing him? He literally said "we get hung up on this child sexual abuse stuff." Really? Get hung up on it? I guess it's not an important topic to him. Further, he said he gives good oral because he learned as a minor giving oral to a priest. Creepy statement. These are statements from milos. How can you even defend this? Because he's a republican?
I agree that his comments were poorly worded and ill informed, but do you think that they were offensive enough to justify the reaction they have caused and merit him being blacklisted?
-
You should really watch Milo's apologetic yet defiant press conference.
How can I defend it? I stand up for free speech. I've spent a lot of time watching and listening to Milo (which most of his critics have not) and I think I have a pretty good feel for the context in which all this stuff was said. I stand up for Milo, I stand up for liberal twats that I hate like Howard Stern and Bill Maher. Anyone who doesn't like it or wants to attribute a different motive like partisanship can go right ahead. Knock yourself out.
When you're job is to say crazy shit and piss people off for entertainment (and also to make people think) then occasional you are going to overstep, or mis-speak. I give people latitude with their words and I give them an opportunity to clarify when they say something stupid or questionable. Look at all the stupid crazy I say on Getbig, what kind of a hypocrite would I be if I got outraged about Milo-fucking-Yiannopoulos? It's not always easy to be precise on a 4 hour podcast with Joe Rogan. I certainly don't jump to label someone a pedophile over some comments especially when they were the victim and not the perpetrator. That disgusting fat twat Lena Dunham openly discussed molesting her sister. Nobody gave a fuck. She didn't lose her job. She a darling of the left.
I'm merely trying to point out that not much in this world is what it appears to be. There are a lot of fake people out there pretending to be outraged. Making mountains out of molehills while simultaneously ignoring real issues, vastly more serious issues. This was a targeted hit on Milo because the left loves identity politics and he was problematic for them. They think a gay jew who loves black cock should be on their side. He pointed out a lot of their hypocrisy and so he has to go. I'm not falling for it, period. Very simple.
He has every right to say whatever he wants about child abuse and others have every right to vilify him for saying such things. Free speech isn't one way. I am sure he is well aware of that. Very simple.
-
I agree that his comments were poorly worded and ill informed, but do you think that they were offensive enough to justify the reaction they have caused and merit him being blacklisted?
That is not for me to decide. I didn't blacklist him from his book deal or Breitbart news. The people behind the book deal and Breitbart exercised their free speech/expression to blacklist him. That is their right. Whether or not I agree with it will not make a difference.
-
He has every right to say whatever he wants about child abuse and others have every right to vilify him for saying such things. Free speech isn't one way. I am sure he is well aware of that. Very simple.
Which would be fine if that outrage was...
a. Genuine
and
b. Enforced consistently regardless of political affiliation.
I'm just curious, do you agree that this was an intentional, organized hit designed to damage Milo's reputation and take him out?
-
All pedos need to go to prison and get raped daily.
-
All pedos need to go to prison.
I agree, but Milo isn't one of them.
I also have the unpopular opinion that society has an obligation to protect prison inmates from rape when they are incarcerated. I'm not 100% sure how we could prevent it, I don't agree that we should all just accept that prison ass-rape is ok...regardless of the crime. Like I said, most people in the US don't give a shit about this, I do...even for POS murderers and rapists.
-
All pedos need to go to prison and get raped daily.
Careful with "all," friend. Let's just focus on the other team's creeps. Party first, always.
-
Which would be fine if that outrage was...
a. Genuine
and
b. Enforced consistently regardless of political affiliation.
I'm just curious, do you agree that this was an intentional, organized hit designed to damage Milo's reputation and take him out?
Cut the shit. Even if the outrage was genuine, you'd still be saying stuff like, "Its because hes a republican."
Anyway, that's the different between you and I. I don't give a shit about party affiliation. I only care about the comments about child abuse--I don't care who says them or what political party they identify with.
I cannot confirm or deny if it was an organized hit. I really don't care. I only care what he said about child abuse. Whatever happens afterwards is the consequence of his statements. For me, democrat or republican, may outrage would be genuine. I cannot speak for others.
-
So they bury Milo for something he said a year ago jokingly about his abuse...
BUT
This guy is a CNN host who is untouchable hero?
https://twitter.com/ChrisCuomo/status/834745679394246658
(https://s27.postimg.org/dfcg6dg2r/asdasdad.jpg)
-
Cut the shit. Even if the outrage was genuine, you'd still be saying stuff like, "Its because hes a republican."
Anyway, that's the different between you and I. I don't give a shit about party affiliation. I only care about the comments about child abuse--I don't care who says them or what political party they identify with.
I cannot confirm or deny if it was an organized hit. I really don't care. I only care what he said about child abuse. Whatever happens afterwards is the consequence of his statements. For me, democrat or republican, may outrage would be genuine. I cannot speak for others.
That's a cop out. Of course it was a targeted hit. Don't pretend.
FYI, it might not have been Democrats that started this bullshit either. Some factions of the Republican party have no love for Milo.
The hard left hates Milo because he's a gay Republican and the hard right hates Milo because he's phaggot.
-
That's a cop out. Of course it was a targeted hit. Don't pretend.
FYI, it might not have been Democrats that started this bullshit either. Some factions of the Republican party have no love for Milo.
The hard left hates Milo because he's a gay Republican and the hard right hates Milo because he's phaggot.
It's not a cop out. I'm not going to assert the intentions of others if I do not know them.
The funny thing is that YOU ask me a question, then I give you an honest answer, then you say its a cop out because I don't agree with you. So, what was the purpose of asking me the question if you were not going to believe my answer? Sounds like a temper tantrum (don't get the answer you want, then assert you know what I am really thinking).
From what I briefly read, it was republicans who initially outted him or something. Though, I could be wrong.
-
From what I briefly read, it was republicans who initially outted him or something. Though, I could be wrong.
..And why would they do that if it wasn't a targeted hit? BOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
..And why would they do that if it wasn't a targeted hit? BOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe because they do not want to be associated with people who make weird comments about pedophilia. I do not blame them. Further, people who make comments like that should be exposed in order to potentially protect others.
You just said above that their outrage would be okay if it was genuine. Maybe it was genuine. Maybe not.I do not know the intentions of others. But perhaps it was genuine and that is why they exposed him.
So, not really "boooooommmmm" at all.
-
Careful with "all," friend. Let's just focus on the other team's creeps. Party first, always.
yes all, pedo sex is any child under the age of 13. If you raped a child under 13 yo, you need to go straight to prison and raped daily.
-
I agree, but Milo isn't one of them.
I also have the unpopular opinion that society has an obligation to protect prison inmates from rape when they are incarcerated. I'm not 100% sure how we could prevent it, I don't agree that we should all just accept that prison ass-rape is ok...regardless of the crime. Like I said, most people in the US don't give a shit about this, I do...even for POS murderers and rapists.
I have the opinion that we need to protect non-violent prisoners from raped. Violent offenders, should be able to handle their own.
But, If you raped a kid, ass raping should be promoted. Eye for an eye, for these sick fucks.
-
Strawman? lol That's exactly what is happening.
"Trump is literally Hitler", "Milo is a White Nationalist", blah blah blah. All fucking day.
Please quote the post(s) where I said such things. Otherwise, go argue with whomever it is that's had you preoccupied during our kid-fucking banter.
Pretty sure your issue is with whichever dopes on the left Sean/Rush/Levin/whomever has you stewing over. Idiots what employ the same sorta hyperbolic nonsense as you, I suppose. Go argue with them.
-
I have the opinion that we need to protect non-violent prisoners from raped. Violent offenders, should be able to handle their own.
But, If you raped a kid, ass raping should be promoted. Eye for an eye, for these sick fucks.
That's not good enough because prison terms for child molesters is not that long. They come out and do it again.
I say just ship them all off to a deserted island, to where they cannot hurt any other children.
-
So, not really "boooooommmmm" at all.
Denial ain't just a river in Africa.
-
That's not good enough because prison terms for child molesters is not that long. They come out and do it again.
I say just ship them all off to a deserted island, to where they cannot hurt any other children.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/22/No_escape_poster.jpg)
-
Literally never heard of this guy until last week.
And you're not missing anything. Just another Nobody that the little nobodies out there find 'entertaining' to fill humdrum nothing lives.