Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Yamcha on March 03, 2017, 02:14:42 PM
-
(https://s18.postimg.org/jf0muc27d/aa_316.png)
(https://i.reddituploads.com/c59f9439af684ec989449ea33c829f3d?fit=max&h=1536&w=1536&s=eee4d040a1314124245ca42a4eed4eb9)
-
https://streamable.com/j7ijv (https://streamable.com/j7ijv)
-
He's not serious though but trolling ???
About the investigation I mean.
-
He's not serious though but trolling ???
About the investigation I mean.
Yes, not serious.
Just pointing out the hypocrisy
-
Yes, not serious.
Just pointing out the hypocrisy
Well played by him.
Especially the Pelosi "lie" spot - it will be hard for her to call anyone out now that she has been caught doing exactly what she has condemned members of Trump's team doing 8)
-
Yes, not serious.
Just pointing out the hypocrisy
LOL - what is the hypocrisy
Did Russia help Schumer and Pelosi to get elected by hacking their opponents emails
Did Schumer or Pelosi or their surrogates meet with Russian officials during their elections and then deny those meetings took place
Those are the issues
Just meeting Putin or a Russian representative is not an issue
-
LOL - what is the hypocrisy
Did Russia help Schumer and Pelosi to get elected by hacking their opponents emails
Did Schumer or Pelosi or their surrogates meet with Russian officials during their elections and then deny those meetings took place
Those are the issues
Just meeting Putin or a Russian representative is not an issue
Can you prove that Schumer and Pelosi didn't conspire with the Russians to "plant" tampering evidence against whatever Republican candidate that was going to run in 2016?
-
Can you prove that Schumer and Pelosi didn't conspire with the Russians to "plant" tampering evidence against whatever Republican candidate that was going to run in 2016?
yes
-
yes
do it fag
-
doubtlessly there is hypocrisy involved but it is not childish of the President of the USA to be personally nitpicking these things
has he nothing better to be doing and what of his delegation skills ?
I think it's funny, but yes it is childish. He ought let his surrogates deal with this stuff.
-
I think it's funny, but yes it is childish. He ought let his surrogates deal with this stuff.
They aren't though. They are all backing down as has been the norm for years still. Plus another way of getting the message out to the masses.
Also, it has as much merit as what they are doing so why not? At this point they are ridiculous/unable to be reasoned with. He really needs to find out the leakers in reality and pursue legal recourse against them as much as possible. Also, do what he said and go after Clinton. Fight fire with fire.
Funniest thing about this is Putin was doing whatever he wanted anyways when Obama was in power so why would he want a new administration?
-
LOL - what is the hypocrisy
Did Russia help Schumer and Pelosi to get elected by hacking their opponents emails
Did Schumer or Pelosi or their surrogates meet with Russian officials during their elections and then deny those meetings took place
Those are the issues
Just meeting Putin or a Russian representative is not an issue
Holy shit....how do you even get by day to day?
-
Holy shit....how do you even get by day to day?
settle down Nancy
I appreciate your concern
I'm doing pretty well
-
So there's proof of the Russians hacking the DNC and not an internal leak by the now deceased/hit Seth Rich? Where is that proof exactly?
-
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told Fox News host Sean Hannity that he was sure that the Russian government was not the source of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign chairman John Podesta.
"We can say, we have said, repeatedly over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party," Assange said, in response to Hannity asking whether he could tell the American people “1,000 percent” that the emails did not come from Russia.
On its face, Assange's claim that the emails were not from a state party could check out. For example, a criminal organization in possession of the documents (that were, theoretically, given to them by a state) could still leak that information to WikiLeaks, which would give Assange plausible deniability.
But WikiLeaks prides itself on anonymity for its sources. How does Assange even know anything about the source of the emails, let alone be absolutely certain they did not come from Russia?
Looks like we've got to take the intelligence agencies for their word, or Assange for his word. They are contradictory. However, the intelligence agencies "proof" showed a basic phishing technique that "has been used by Russian State actors in the past"... along with every Joe Blow cyber criminal.
So, pick your poison.
-
(https://s11.postimg.org/o8do0vxjn/aa_317.png)
-
The meetings are of public knowledge by the press. Ridiculous argument by Trump
-
(https://i.redd.it/ovf8k7n9iejy.jpg)(https://i.redd.it/g2aggllbqejy.jpg)
-
"potential of indictment of a former sitting president." - Fox News
(https://i.redd.it/quokyaknsejy.jpg)
-
(https://s11.postimg.org/o8do0vxjn/aa_317.png)
(https://i.redd.it/8ujp0ogqtejy.jpg)
-
(https://i.redd.it/8ujp0ogqtejy.jpg)
"tapp" ::) ::)...he was so close
-
(https://i.redd.it/8ujp0ogqtejy.jpg)
"tapp" ::) ::)...he was so close
and "Mr. Black Nixon" Obama is so close too!