Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Little Billy on May 10, 2017, 01:16:55 AM
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
So what you are saying is that all human knowledge was present at 120 years ago, and last 120 years haven't increase humans knowledge even a bit. Even in the scale of getbig that is quite stupid thing to say..
-
What if there's a third possibility, and that is that your precious Dr George Wald is wrong...?
-
You want proof of evolution? Don't clean out your fridge for 6 months.
-
Life finds a way...
(https://i.redd.it/yn51s4za3dwy.png)
-
:D
-
:D
Nowadays he'd probably announce it on instagram.
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
(http://liccourtsquare.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/data-laughing.gif)
-
Why would he not want to believe in a Creator? It doesn't automatically mean that the Creator is also a judge. Or that the Creator has any involvement whatsoever with his creation. We could just be his little fun experiment and now he's gone.
-
So little Billy. Ever finish the big FUCK YOU Tattoo you got?
-
Has any atheist, blinded by the light of my lucid logic, renounced his atheism yet?
-
Has any atheist, blinded by the light of my lucid logic, renounced his atheism yet?
Fuck off, gimmick.
-
:)
-
Fuck off, gimmick.
The truth hurts, doesn't it?
-
Proof of a higher power -
.
-
How about creation by a superior species that needn't be worshipped as a "god"?
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
So true
Everyone knows that Brahma is the Creator God
-
:D
.
-
I don't know how or why, so many men just "take it" .
Why do so many men allow a woman to pressure them into doing things they don't want?
From having kids to taking jobs they hate, I've seen plenty of men just going along with her. WTF?
At my wife's Christmas office party I met a real pathetic character.
He was a CPA with a decent income and worked out.
After a few drinks he confessed he hated his marriage and his 12 yr old son was a spoiled brat.
In fact, he last had sex with his wife 7 years ago and they slept in separate rooms.
Why he stayed married was a real mystery to me.
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
(https://boulevardbrutal.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/tenacious-d-in-the-pick-of-destiny_devil-a68f6.jpg)
-
It's stupidity....The idea that mankind started from apes and evolved into the level that we are discussing this on computers is preposterous...There had to be someone/something directing this....Einstein came to the same conclusion.....
-
It's stupidity....The idea that mankind started from apes and evolved into the level that we are discussing this on computers is preposterous...There had to be someone/something directing this....Einstein came to the same conclusion.....
We only THINK it's on computers. It's only in our mind.
We're all still on the Savannah throwing feces at eachother
-
Whatever gets you to the light is alright.
-
:D
-
Religion and believing in some folklore is utter stupidity. Complete utter stupidity.
-
George Wald utterly demolished atheism.
-
George Wald utterly demolished atheism.
Wald present an opinion, and therefore he is god for you? What Wald say was that there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution). What he didn't say that it was by creation, that is your own opinion about the matter, and there isn't any scientific evidence about that. What comes to evolution, there is plenty of evidence, which you guys deny with your IQ, which is hardly over 80 points. What that means is the fact, that you have just about same IQ than average cuckoo clock has, and you still can outwit millions of scientist with it ;D
-
the funny thing is that evolution and creationism aren't incompatible ideas.
if you believe in god, god started the whole thing, made earth and heavens and the universe, then by evolution species advanced to this point, and all of it -- INCLUDING the evolutionary process -- was part of his master plan.
if you don't believe in god, start that off at the big bang, then the formation of our planet, then evolution, and get to this point.
tah-dah, billy boy you've been blown out the water
-
the funny thing is that evolution and creationism aren't incompatible ideas.
if you believe in god, god started the whole thing, made earth and heavens and the universe, then by evolution species advanced to this point, and all of it -- INCLUDING the evolutionary process -- was part of his master plan.
if you don't believe in god, start that off at the big bang, then the formation of our planet, then evolution, and get to this point.
tah-dah, billy boy you've been blown out the water
The Bible clearly says that god created Adam and Eve and everything we see around us as is. Evolution is not possible according to the Bible. Now, if you believe in another magical sky daddy who created bacteria and single cell organisms, and let them evolve, then yes that's compatible. But when people mention creationism in the western world, they're usually talking about the Bible.
-
"There are only two possibilities as to how life arose; one is spontaneous generation arising to evolution, the other is a supernatural creative act of God, there is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with only one possible conclusion, that life arose as a creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God, therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation arising to evolution."
-- Dr. George Wald, Professor Emeritus of Biology at Harvard University, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
That quote is wrong.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/part1-4.html
-
the funny thing is that evolution and creationism aren't incompatible ideas.
if you believe in god, god started the whole thing, made earth and heavens and the universe, then by evolution species advanced to this point, and all of it -- INCLUDING the evolutionary process -- was part of his master plan.
if you don't believe in god, start that off at the big bang, then the formation of our planet, then evolution, and get to this point.
tah-dah, billy boy you've been blown out the water
Of course evolution and creationism are utterly incompatible - the fact of divine creation shows that evolution is pure bs. God did it all in six days six thousand years ago.
-
Of course evolution and creationism are utterly incompatible - the fact of divine creation shows that evolution is pure bs. God did it all in six days six thousand years ago.
how about you just believe whatever you want and let everyone else do the same thing
or you can post this stuff on the religion board
-
Of course evolution and creationism are utterly incompatible - the fact of divine creation shows that evolution is pure bs. God did it all in six days six thousand years ago.
Informative stuff, thanks.
-
Wald present an opinion, and therefore he is god for you? What Wald say was that there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution). What he didn't say that it was by creation, that is your own opinion about the matter, and there isn't any scientific evidence about that. What comes to evolution, there is plenty of evidence, which you guys deny with your IQ, which is hardly over 80 points. What that means is the fact, that you have just about same IQ than average cuckoo clock has, and you still can outwit millions of scientist with it ;D
Wald presented the facts. Since evolution has been debunked, the only scientifically viable option, and hence the truth, is that God did it.
-
So what you are saying is that all human knowledge was present at 120 years ago, and last 120 years haven't increase humans knowledge even a bit. Even in the scale of getbig that is quite stupid thing to say..
You miss the point. Abiogenesis was roundly debunked over a century ago, and atheists like you yet cling to it. You are barking up the wrong tree.
-
The Bible clearly says that god created Adam and Eve and everything we see around us as is. Evolution is not possible according to the Bible. Now, if you believe in another magical sky daddy who created bacteria and single cell organisms, and let them evolve, then yes that's compatible. But when people mention creationism in the western world, they're usually talking about the Bible.
yah that's the magical fairy-tale story, however you've got christians, probably, who still believe in a god and a higher power, but realize that mankind coming up with the *exact* way it actually happened, all tied up in a neat little bow like that only 6,000 years ago is pure bullshit, so i think they're the ones who are close to reconciling evolution and creationism as i explained in the quote you replied to
-
yah that's the magical fairy-tale story, however you've got christians, probably, who still believe in a god and a higher power, but realize that mankind coming up with the *exact* way it actually happened, all tied up in a neat little bow like that only 6,000 years ago is pure bullshit, so i think they're the ones who are close to reconciling evolution and creationism as i explained in the quote you replied to
You do realize that there are many proofs of a young Earth, don't you? Reality is not a fairy tale just because you are alienated from it.
-
You do realize that there are many proofs of a young Earth, don't you? Reality is not a fairy tale just because you are alienated from it.
Sex and gender are the same thing. Creating a difference between the two is just a way to enable those that are mentally ill.
Homosexuaity is perfectly natural (yet still a defect from a reproduction/propagation-of-the-species standpoint) because it only refers to desire. Nobody can tell someone who they can and can't be attracted to.
Transgenderism, and especially non binary genderism however, is a mental illness that society has enabled and supported due to an extreme fear of being politically incorrect.
-
Wald presented the facts. Since evolution has been debunked, the only scientifically viable option, and hence the truth, is that God did it.
Facts comes always with evidence, and claims about evolution been debunked is just bullshit made up by the idiots who wear tin foil hats. Your mistake is talk about evolution like it is some historical happening, while it is ongoing event, doing it's work as we speak. For example: There is new studies about the behaviour of the chimpanzees deep in the jungle. There is a large group of chimps which uses human methods at the battles of the territory. They have hierarchy among them just like in army, and they do decisions as a group. There is also bit older study about another group of chimps, and these little buggers shows symptoms of religious behaviour. By the study they choose some object, large rock of tree, and bring gifts to it, sit around it and spend time by it. In other words, chimps of the modern times has evolve to adopt these things, even they do not have any knowledge about the humans. Few years ahead we could see first church going chimps singing hymns, and this is just how evolution proves itself day by day ;D
-
Facts comes always with evidence, and claims about evolution been debunked is just bullshit made up by the idiots who wear tin foil hats. Your mistake is talk about evolution like it is some historical happening, while it is ongoing event, doing it's work as we speak. For example: There is new studies about the behaviour of the chimpanzees deep in the jungle. There is a large group of chimps which uses human methods at the battles of the territory. They have hierarchy among them just like in army, and they do decisions as a group. There is also bit older study about another group of chimps, and these little buggers shows symptoms of religious behaviour. By the study they choose some object, large rock of tree, and bring gifts to it, sit around it and spend time by it. In other words, chimps of the modern times has evolve to adopt these things, even they do not have any knowledge about the humans. Few years ahead we could see first church going chimps singing hymns, and this is just how evolution proves itself day by day ;D
How could any evolution have occurred if monkeys begat only monkeys and only humans begat humans? Zero evolutionary change multiplied by any number of generations, no matter how large, equals precisely zero (evolution).
-
How could any evolution have occurred if monkeys begat only monkeys and only humans begat humans? Zero evolutionary change multiplied by any number of generations, no matter how large, equals precisely zero (evolution).
you're not talking sense. it's not a human boy popping out of a monkey's vagina one day. it's a slow, gradual process, over hundreds of thousands of years.
Also please respond to my tranny post.
-
you're not talking sense. it's not a human boy popping out of a monkey's vagina one day. it's a slow, gradual process, over hundreds of thousands of years.
Also please respond to my tranny post.
I bet you popped out of a monkey's pussy, Gloria.
-
I bet you popped out of a monkey's pussy, Gloria.
Oh yeah, I forgot. Sorry brah.
Guess that disproves the "no evolution" theory either way!
-
Of course evolution and creationism are utterly incompatible - the fact of divine creation shows that evolution is pure bs. God did it all in six days six thousand years ago.
You misquoted Wald, and since you didn't bother reading my link here is a portion below. And in no way did he believe in a 6,000 yr old earth. In the 50's the earth was believed to be 2 billion years, now that figure is near 5 billion, only getting worse for you. ;)
What the controversy reviewed above showed to be untenable is only the belief that living organisms arise spontaneously under present conditions [Louis Pasteur and others]. We have now to face a somewhat different problem: how organisms may have arisen spontaneously under different conditions in some former period, granted that they do so no longer.
-
Don't understand you fighting with each other..
Evolution is the HOW but NOT the WHY...
Something can't come from nothing....
It had to always have existed as the Universe is infinite.
Big bang is the how....
Creation is the why...
-
Wald presented the facts. Since evolution has been debunked, the only scientifically viable option, and hence the truth, is that God did it.
:)
-
Don't understand you fighting with each other..
Evolution is the HOW but NOT the WHY...
Something can't come from nothing....
It had to always have existed as the Universe is infinite.
Big bang is the how....
Creation is the why...
Take your common sense and ability to understand multiple view points and go to a board where it is accepted. How dare you propose that a change in allelic frequency over time doesn't totally negate that the universe was created by a god?
-
Both Atheism AND religion are bullshit because both assume mankind has intellectually evolved enough to explain the Universe. Its like saying that when you get to a certain point in an IQ test where you can no longer intellectually understand the questions. Its not because the questions are God or lack of God.
Tough pill to swallow...but we may not be the final, most intelligent life form
Concepts like beginning and ending of time could possibly be comprehended with sufficient intellect which humans do not have. We only have the fervent need to explain how everything works....even if we simply don't know yet.
-
How could any evolution have occurred if monkeys begat only monkeys and only humans begat humans? Zero evolutionary change multiplied by any number of generations, no matter how large, equals precisely zero (evolution).
That is utterly stupid comment, if you need to know what utterly stupid means. Point at the matter is that these chimps learn new things and because of that, they survive better than apes with lower IQ, and they rise higher level of the food chain. Their offspring will have even higher IQ and better changes to survive by that. Next thing you know is that those hairy buggers sit nex to you at the church. It may take few thousand years, but there is lot of time in this universe. If you don't get it, look around? Need some evidence about evolution? How about same sex marriages? Didn't believe that is possible 20 years ago? Moronism which make Trump a president of USA? That's dark side of the evolution, because while most of the nations IQ is rising, some of the nations it is going down. All these are little bits of evolution as we see it at present time. Need more proof?
-
Humans did not evolve from monkeys... monkeys are a relative of the "monkey-like" creature humans evolved from which no longer exists.
This is why humans are humans and monkeys are still monkeys
-
Humans did not evolve from monkeys... monkeys are a relative of the "monkey-like" creature humans evolved from which no longer exists.
This is why humans are humans and monkeys are still monkeys
So explain why there is fossiles of our ancestors just about at every step between ape and homo sapiens? If you study skeleton by skeleton you can see who comes first and how the next generation has evolved. For example: In Europe we have castles which has been build at middle ages and if you go to visit one, you see that doorways are quite low. Why? Because people were at least 8" shorter at that time, and by industrial revolution and changes in the food and lifestyle new generations grow to be taller. Even now kids tend to grow few percent taller than their parents, and why? Evolution goes on.
-
George Wald utterly demolished atheism.
he just invokes God of gaps theory.same old nonsense...Oh God isn,t God a shit.
-
So explain why there is fossiles of our ancestors just about at every step between ape and homo sapiens? If you study skeleton by skeleton you can see who comes first and how the next generation has evolved. For example: In Europe we have castles which has been build at middle ages and if you go to visit one, you see that doorways are quite low. Why? Because people were at least 8" shorter at that time, and by industrial revolution and changes in the food and lifestyle new generations grow to be taller. Even now kids tend to grow few percent taller than their parents, and why? Evolution goes on.
Yes.. man evolved... however he evolved NOT from monkeys... but from a different mammal which is why monkeys still exist.
-
All very well but where did these monkeys come from?
-
All very well but where did these monkeys come from?
I mean literally the answer to all such nonsensical questions is in the theory of evolution.
Unless you're just trolling
-
This all sounds a bit chicken/egg, Old Sport.
-
Yes.. man evolved... however he evolved NOT from monkeys... but from a different mammal which is why monkeys still exist.
Bit of semantics here - monkeys are still man's predecessor; it's just that the eventually-human branch evolved from manlike ape-to-apelike man first. The other monkeys - the still monkeys - most likely held fast in a monkey-friendly environment, thereby remaining simian. We're still related, though.
Point being, a predecessor mustn't go extinct for the more evolved species to emerge. Hell, we were fish long before we aped, and wormy sea-things before that; yet both still exist in one capacity or another.
-
This all sounds a bit chicken/egg, Old Sport.
If you're talking about the origin of existence, ie, the big bang, that can be pretty easily reconciled with the idea of a higher power, just by saying "yeah God did it".
...and then God created evolution to get all of us to the point we're at today.
OR you can attribute it to random entropy of the universe, whatever, the point is, such semantics don't really matter and believing in evolution does in no way preclude you from believing in some higher entity.
people like OP are just silly, clinging onto the ideas of the earth spontaneously being formed 6,000 years ago just because some group of people got together centuries ago and wrote a book about it. Like, yeah man, they definitely have proper evidence for that.
::)
-
Yes.. man evolved... however he evolved NOT from monkeys... but from a different mammal which is why monkeys still exist.
And as always, we have to take your word for it? That is the difference between beliefs and facts: You can prove facts. Your mistake is in the idea that homo sapiens somehow stop to be an ape. Just look your fellow citizens when lights goes out and looting starts. What you see is a prominent type of behavior which comes straight from the spinal cord ;D
-
If you're talking about the origin of existence, ie, the big bang, that can be pretty easily reconciled with the idea of a higher power, just by saying "yeah God did it".
...and then God created evolution to get all of us to the point we're at today.
OR you can attribute it to random entropy of the universe, whatever, the point is, such semantics don't really matter and believing in evolution does in no way preclude you from believing in some higher entity.
people like OP are just silly, clinging onto the ideas of the earth spontaneously being formed 6,000 years ago just because some group of people got together centuries ago and wrote a book about it. Like, yeah man, they definitely have proper evidence for that.
::)
If God did it then evolution did not happen since evolution is the notion that it all developed by chance. God created the Earth since design can only arise from a designer, and we know that He did it six millennia ago as science attests the Biblical account in numerous ways.
-
If God did it then evolution did not happen since evolution is the notion that it all developed by chance. God created the Earth since design can only arise from a designer, and we know that He did it six millennia ago as science attests the Biblical account in numerous ways.
you're really confused.
evolution is not the notion that it all developed by chance.
this tells me you're arguing against something that's not actually there.
and please show me what science confirms the earth coming into being 6,000 years ago.
are dinosaur bones all a fraud, too?
-
you're really confused.
evolution is not the notion that it all developed by chance.
this tells me you're arguing against something that's not actually there.
and please show me what science confirms the earth coming into being 6,000 years ago.
are dinosaur bones all a fraud, too?
Correct. The exact opposite, in fact.
-
I only want to know what Zarah Elise evolved from
(http://68.media.tumblr.com/688c1437da02f9f6feacd38764cb51b4/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo3_1280.jpg)(http://68.media.tumblr.com/f7ef0480ddf449ba5ca2de053da55e00/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo2_1280.jpg)(http://68.media.tumblr.com/2df0b4ee1500a188e6891473f873f903/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo1_1280.jpg)
-
I only want to know what Zarah Elise evolved from
(http://68.media.tumblr.com/688c1437da02f9f6feacd38764cb51b4/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo3_1280.jpg)(http://68.media.tumblr.com/f7ef0480ddf449ba5ca2de053da55e00/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo2_1280.jpg)(http://68.media.tumblr.com/2df0b4ee1500a188e6891473f873f903/tumblr_oq08dbnaBg1tnaufeo1_1280.jpg)
If I could bury my nose in her sweaty asshole and lap up her pussy juices, I'd believe in god.
-
There is a reason most intelligent people are atheists.
-
Hairless dude looks like an old wrestler
Still the alpha in that clique
-
Top Poodle, that is precisely what evolution is. Abiogenesis is random, mutations are random, and so-called Natural Selection is random. Every evolutionary circumstance is random. Why do you think every atheist claims that evolution is fact? Since evolution is purely random, there is no space for any God therein.
-
Top Poodle, that is precisely what evolution is. Abiogenesis is random, mutations are random, and so-called Natural Selection is random. Every evolutionary circumstance is random. Why do you think every atheist claims that evolution is fact? Since evolution is purely random, there is no space for any God therein.
Bill,
No. SO very no.
Perhaps we should revisit the process - but first, listen to this:
Now, read this:
-
If I could bury my nose in her sweaty asshole and lap up her pussy juices, I'd believe in god.
Resembles an obese kid.
-
Bill,
No. SO very no.
So very yes. If no designer is involved then evolution is entirely random, totally unplanned and unguided.
-
So very yes. If no designer is involved then evolution is entirely random, totally unplanned and unguided.
Ok, so that's settled.
How do we now go about figuring out who or what designed everything?
-
So very yes. If no designer is involved then evolution is entirely random, totally unplanned and unguided.
by this reasoning, water running down the banks of a river is also entirely random and unguided.
...yet the riverbanks guide it.
???
-
Since evolution is purely random, there is no space for any God therein.
That's not even logically feasible.
If you believe in god, you can say he started everything, started the chain reaction that brought about evolution and brought us to where we are now.
What is so hard to reconcile there?
-
Top Poodle, that is precisely what evolution is. Abiogenesis is random, mutations are random, and so-called Natural Selection is random. Every evolutionary circumstance is random. Why do you think every atheist claims that evolution is fact? Since evolution is purely random, there is no space for any God therein.
Evolution is random only for the idiots who doesn't understand the concept of it. For example, we know that intelligence is inheritable feature, so there is clear reason why children of technological societies are smarter than children from undeveloped societies. Why it is inheritable feature? Because of evolution, so that the species develops better survival capabilities. It is quite simple and not random at all.
-
^^ billy is arguing against something that isn't there.
He thinks evolution means X. Evolution actually means Y. He discredits everybody who accepts the empirically proven theory because he assumes it is X, whereas in reality, it's fucking Y.
X and Y are not equal
-
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/600x315/84/e3/0c/84e30c25dca10d6e31f63306c992ce95.jpg)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wG6RTJeAf0U/hqdefault.jpg)
Natty fella, doesn't even lift.
Delts overpowering arms and chest
-
Religion and believing in some folklore is utter stupidity. Complete utter stupidity.
This ^^
A childrens story book with talking snakes,immaculate conceptions, magic man in the sky ::)
-
This ^^
A childrens story book with talking snakes,immaculate conceptions, magic man in the sky ::)
Reality is not stupid simply because you lack the brains to comprehend it.
-
Evolution is random only for the idiots who doesn't understand the concept of it. For example, we know that intelligence is inheritable feature, so there is clear reason why children of technological societies are smarter than children from undeveloped societies. Why it is inheritable feature? Because of evolution, so that the species develops better survival capabilities. It is quite simple and not random at all.
There is no natural mechanism for species developing better survival capabilities since randomness does not accomplish wonders; you are living in a dream world. Creatures' ability to adapt was created by God and did not randomly evolve. Children of technological societies are smarter obviously because they benefit from better education. The inheritance of traits demonstrates that creatures reproduce only their own kind, which makes 'monkeys to men' evolution impossible. Sorry.
-
^^ billy is arguing against something that isn't there.
He thinks evolution means X. Evolution actually means Y. He discredits everybody who accepts the empirically proven theory because he assumes it is X, whereas in reality, it's fucking Y.
X and Y are not equal
You yet do not understand that the entire idea of evolution is that it is wholly random. Evolution is bullshit because the empirical evidence reveals that creatures ever reproduce their own kind. Nil evolutionary change multiplied by any number of successive generations equates to exactly zero evolution. Your fathers were humans, not monkeys. Science and mathematics combine to burst your evolutionary bubble.
-
"Lit-tle BilLEE's ...
Sweeet William now."
-
You yet do not understand that the entire idea of evolution is that it is wholly random. Evolution is bullshit because the empirical evidence reveals that creatures ever reproduce their own kind. Nil evolutionary change multiplied by any number of successive generations equates to exactly zero evolution. Your fathers were humans, not monkeys. Science and mathematics combine to burst your evolutionary bubble.
see guys?
he's arguing Y.
nobody believes in Y.
lmao what a dolt.
-
You yet do not understand that the entire idea of evolution is that it is wholly random. Evolution is bullshit because the empirical evidence reveals that creatures ever reproduce their own kind. Nil evolutionary change multiplied by any number of successive generations equates to exactly zero evolution. Your fathers were humans, not monkeys. Science and mathematics combine to burst your evolutionary bubblebutt.
(http://68.media.tumblr.com/0674cd4aa7284d878f6d10371ac17bf4/tumblr_oly3a9xL7R1r31x9ko1_1280.jpg)
-
see guys?
he's arguing Y.
nobody believes in Y.
lmao what a dolt.
What fools believe is irrelevant; I merely supply the facts. You are out of your league, son.
-
http://i.imgur.com/b4g0lg3.gif (http://i.imgur.com/b4g0lg3.gif)
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a209/spekaboxx/junior_dos_santos_UFC_FOX_funny.gif)
http://i.imgur.com/cVsLIDT.gif (http://i.imgur.com/cVsLIDT.gif)
(https://thumbs.gfycat.com/YellowishRewardingChimpanzee-size_restricted.gif)
-
Someone please explain why evolutionists constantly spew Stupid.
-
Zahra Elise
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-cover-mixed-magazine.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-01.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-08.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-30.jpg)
-
Someone please explain why evolutionists constantly spew Stupid.
Yes, total stupid spewers. You've established that evolution is nonsense, but you have yet to address this:
How do we now go about figuring out who or what designed everything?
Imagine you already have a creator in mind - because, like everyone else, you chose a god first, then worked your way backward - but it's now on you to provide evidence. Without spewing stupid, of course.
-
Yes, total stupid spewers. You've established that evolution is nonsense, but you have yet to address this:
Imagine you already have a creator in mind - because, like everyone else, you chose a god first, then worked your way backward - but it's now on you to provide evidence. Without spewing stupid, of course.
The Creator is obviously God. God's miraculous presence has been witnessed in the lives of many. Additionally, Scripture is amply attested by history, science, and archaeology.
-
The Creator is obviously God. God's miraculous presence has been witnessed in the lives of many. Additionally, Scripture is amply attested by history, science, and archaeology.
troll confirmed 100%
-
troll confirmed 100%
Reality doth speak.
'In Hawaii a young man brought to Ruth and me his
grandmother, who was about eighty and blind. She
was from French speaking Switzerland, and her
mother tongue was French. Although I was not
conscious of having any great faith, Ruth and I began
to pray for her. Then, speaking in English, I
commanded the spirit of blindness to leave the
woman. After a few moments, the woman turned to
me and said in French, "le vous vois" ("I can see
you"). I was both amazed and delighted!'
-Derek Prince
-
The Creator is obviously God. God's miraculous presence has been witnessed in the lives of many. Additionally, Scripture is amply attested by history, science, and archaeology.
Sweet, we've narrowed it down to "God," a word designated for nearly 3,000 magical beings man has worshipped over time. Then Scripture with a big S, which often denotes the New Testament - so, Christianity.
Jesus, then.
The God you inherited from your country/culture, from your parents. The one that just so happens to make the most sense, right? "Amply attested by history, science, and archaeology," you say. Really, dude? Seriously, thought you had more. Started a thread, all those posts, then the lazy default to pop religion.
And we're all just supposed to assume you meant Christ - because, of course. That's how much thought you put into it.
-
The Ugly, you are sorely mistaken. God is not a God of any culture but the true God; the Bible is pure fact.
"I know of no finding in archaeology that’s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen."
- Dr Clifford Wilson, formerly director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology
-
Sweet, we've narrowed it down to "God," a word designated for nearly 3,000 magical beings man has worshipped over time. Then Scripture with a big S, which often denotes the New Testament - so, Christianity.
Jesus, then.
The God you inherited from your country/culture, from your parents. The one that just so happens to make the most sense, right? "Amply attested by history, science, and archaeology," you say. Really, dude? Seriously, thought you had more. Started a thread, all those posts, then the lazy default to pop religion.
And we're all just supposed to assume you meant Christ - because, of course. That's how much thought you put into it.
Dude, you're arguing with a guy who think he's annihilated the theory of evolution by pointing out that humans don't pop out of monkey vaginas as a whole.
-
Dude, you're arguing with a guy who think he's annihilated the theory of evolution by pointing out that humans don't pop out of monkey vaginas as a whole.
I annihilated the theory of evolution in two ways. First, randomness does not beget design, and second, monkeys and fish do not beget men. You have absolutely no argument against these universal realities, which is why you are compelled to fall back on nonsense.
-
I annihilated the theory of evolution in two ways. First, randomness does not beget design, and second, monkeys and fish do not beget men. You have absolutely no argument against these universal realities, which is why you are compelled to fall back on nonsense.
I like your style.
Question:
1. Do you know what "beget" means?
2. What is my nonsense?
-
Billy, do me a favor.
Open up Paint, and mark up this image by crossing out the things you don't agree with:
(http://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/animalsevolution_lg.jpeg)
http://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/animalsevolution_lg.jpeg
(link for high quality)
-
Explain antibiotic resistance.
-
Billy, do me a favor.
Open up Paint, and mark up this image by crossing out the things you don't agree with:
(http://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/animalsevolution_lg.jpeg)
http://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/animalsevolution_lg.jpeg
(link for high quality)
I do not agree with the entire chart. The fact that creatures ever reproduce their own species renders any transmutation impossible. Do you understand me? The whole tree of life is bogus due to genetic laws of inheritance.
-
I do not agree with the entire chart. The fact that creatures ever reproduce their own species renders any transmutation impossible. Do you understand me? The whole tree of life is bogus due to genetic laws of inheritance.
No, I swear to god, I don't understand you. Part of me thinks you're a superb troll, another part thinks you're a gifted idiot, and no part takes you seriously.
If your son is shorter than you, his son shorter than him, his son shorter than him, so on and so forth, and that trait keeps getting passed down, people are shrinking, ten thousand years from now what will your descendants look like?
No other conflation going on.
-
Zahra Elise
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-cover-mixed-magazine.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-01.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-08.jpg)
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-30.jpg)
Despite the boy-do and the fact that I could probably fist her, shove my dick in, and then jerk myself off inside her with the hand that is inside her, she continues to impress me.
-
Despite the boy-do and the fact that I could probably fist her, shove my dick in, and then jerk myself off inside her with the hand that is inside her, she continues to impress me.
Are you implying that her vag is as stretched out as Lil Billys theories about evolution? :D
(http://www.mixedmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/zahra-elise-thong-mixed-magazine-36.jpg)
-
Are you implying that her vag is as stretched out as Lil Billys theories about evolution? :D
Sure would be fun finding out.
Would still rope myself to the doorknob tho. Safety first.
-
Explain antibiotic resistance.
The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.
http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all
-
The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.
http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all
Mutations, not even once?
"If in a population of 1000 bacteria you have one individual who possesses a mutation for antibiotic resistance, and you don't take antibiotics, then there's no advantage to that mutation. The mutation won't be selected for, so it won't become more common. Furthermore, muller's ratchet tells us that genes are deleted in asexual populations, because genes have a cost to produce and maintain, so losing the weight of neutral genes is actually advantageous. Antibiotic resistance could be selected against if antibiotics are absent from the environment."
-
No, I swear to god, I don't understand you. Part of me thinks you're a superb troll, another part thinks you're a gifted idiot, and no part takes you seriously.
If your son is shorter than you, his son shorter than him, his son shorter than him, so on and so forth, and that trait keeps getting passed down, people are shrinking, ten thousand years from now what will your descendants look like?
No other conflation going on.
Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?
-
Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?
Tell me, I'm trembling with excitement.
-
Tell me, I'm trembling with excitement.
The answer is in the very last statement before the question. Creatures only reproduce their own kind; your fathers were therefore exclusively human.
-
The bacteria remain bacteria; there is no evolution. While less resistant strains are eliminated by the medicine, the resistant strains that are already present multiply. So all that is going on is a change in constitution due to the antibiotic.
http://creation.com/superbugs-not-super-after-all
And exactly how you can tell that bacteria of present time can't be new breed of dinosaur at 5 billion years from now? You see, there was quite few living things on this planet ~5 billion years ago, and look at it now?
-
Not every change equates to evolution, which relates to transmutations and development. People begetting people hence does not qualify as evolution. Monkey populations gradually becoming men does, but genetic rules preclude such an occurrence. The theory of evolution posits that your ancestors were fish and reptiles - do you know why science says this is impossible?
What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?
-
What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?
He's very convinced in his stance, but it's based on flawed conjecture.
-
What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?
I'd assume he says the part where you can't witness a human give birth to a fish in real time.
;D
-
What part of science, exactly? Of course you have a link?
All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.
-
All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.
Ahh, see, I was right!
-
All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.
The same google search tells me evolution is real.
what do
-
The same google search tells me evolution is real.
what do
It also tells you that Harry Potter is real. Learn to discern fact from fiction.
-
It also tells you that Harry Potter is real. Learn to discern fact from fiction.
...it doesn't tell me harry potter is real.
-
All of science. Run a Google search on monkey reproduction or human reproduction. Monkeys beget only monkeys, and only humans beget humans.
And as always, we have to take your word for it? That is the difference between beliefs and facts: You can prove facts. Your mistake is in the idea that homo sapiens somehow stop to be an ape. Just look your fellow citizens when lights goes out and looting starts. What you see is a prominent type of behavior which comes straight from the spinal cord ;D