Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Yamcha on June 05, 2017, 03:50:08 PM
-
A 25-year old contract worker from Georgia named Reality Leigh Winner was arrested by FBI today for sending classified information to an online news outlet:
(https://i.redd.it/d2l7auz6ew1z.jpg)
-
The Intercept went ahead and published the leaked information; that won't help her court case:
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/ (https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/)
TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION
RUSSIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE executed a cyberattack on at least one U.S. voting software supplier and sent spear-phishing emails to more than 100 local election officials just days before last November’s presidential election, according to a highly classified intelligence report obtained by The Intercept.
The top-secret National Security Agency document, which was provided anonymously to The Intercept and independently authenticated, analyzes intelligence very recently acquired by the agency about a months-long Russian intelligence cyber effort against elements of the U.S. election and voting infrastructure. The report, dated May 5, 2017, is the most detailed U.S. government account of Russian interference in the election that has yet come to light.
While the document provides a rare window into the NSA’s understanding of the mechanics of Russian hacking, it does not show the underlying “raw” intelligence on which the analysis is based. A U.S. intelligence officer who declined to be identified cautioned against drawing too big a conclusion from the document because a single analysis is not necessarily definitive.
The report indicates that Russian hacking may have penetrated further into U.S. voting systems than was previously understood. It states unequivocally in its summary statement that it was Russian military intelligence, specifically the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, that conducted the cyber attacks described in the document:
Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate actors … executed cyber espionage operations against a named U.S. company in August 2016, evidently to obtain information on elections-related software and hardware solutions. … The actors likely used data obtained from that operation to … launch a voter registration-themed spear-phishing campaign targeting U.S. local government organizations.
This NSA summary judgment is sharply at odds with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denial last week that Russia had interfered in foreign elections: “We never engaged in that on a state level, and have no intention of doing so.” Putin, who had previously issued blanket denials that any such Russian meddling occurred, for the first time floated the possibility that freelance Russian hackers with “patriotic leanings” may have been responsible. The NSA report, on the contrary, displays no doubt that the cyber assault was carried out by the GRU.
The NSA analysis does not draw conclusions about whether the interference had any effect on the election’s outcome and concedes that much remains unknown about the extent of the hackers’ accomplishments. However, the report raises the possibility that Russian hacking may have breached at least some elements of the voting system, with disconcertingly uncertain results.
The NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence were both contacted for this article. Officials requested that we not publish or report on the top secret document and declined to comment on it. When informed that we intended to go ahead with this story, the NSA requested a number of redactions. The Intercept agreed to some of the redaction requests after determining that the disclosure of that material was not clearly in the public interest.
The report adds significant new detail to the picture that emerged from the unclassified intelligence assessment about Russian election meddling released by the Obama administration in January. The January assessment presented the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions but omitted many specifics, citing concerns about disclosing sensitive sources and methods. The assessment concluded with high confidence that the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort “to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”
That review did not attempt to assess what effect the Russian efforts had on the election, despite the fact that “Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards.” According to the Department of Homeland Security, the assessment reported reassuringly, “the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.”
The NSA has now learned, however, that Russian government hackers, part of a team with a “cyber espionage mandate specifically directed at U.S. and foreign elections,” focused on parts of the system directly connected to the voter registration process, including a private sector manufacturer of devices that maintain and verify the voter rolls. Some of the company’s devices are advertised as having wireless internet and Bluetooth connectivity, which could have provided an ideal staging point for further malicious actions.
-
The Intercept went ahead and published the leaked information; that won't help her court case:
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/ (https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/)
TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION
RUSSIAN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE executed a cyberattack on at least one U.S. voting software supplier and sent spear-phishing emails to more than 100 local election officials just days before last November’s presidential election, according to a highly classified intelligence report obtained by The Intercept.
The top-secret National Security Agency document, which was provided anonymously to The Intercept and independently authenticated, analyzes intelligence very recently acquired by the agency about a months-long Russian intelligence cyber effort against elements of the U.S. election and voting infrastructure. The report, dated May 5, 2017, is the most detailed U.S. government account of Russian interference in the election that has yet come to light.
While the document provides a rare window into the NSA’s understanding of the mechanics of Russian hacking, it does not show the underlying “raw” intelligence on which the analysis is based. A U.S. intelligence officer who declined to be identified cautioned against drawing too big a conclusion from the document because a single analysis is not necessarily definitive.
The report indicates that Russian hacking may have penetrated further into U.S. voting systems than was previously understood. It states unequivocally in its summary statement that it was Russian military intelligence, specifically the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate, or GRU, that conducted the cyber attacks described in the document:
Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate actors … executed cyber espionage operations against a named U.S. company in August 2016, evidently to obtain information on elections-related software and hardware solutions. … The actors likely used data obtained from that operation to … launch a voter registration-themed spear-phishing campaign targeting U.S. local government organizations.
This NSA summary judgment is sharply at odds with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denial last week that Russia had interfered in foreign elections: “We never engaged in that on a state level, and have no intention of doing so.” Putin, who had previously issued blanket denials that any such Russian meddling occurred, for the first time floated the possibility that freelance Russian hackers with “patriotic leanings” may have been responsible. The NSA report, on the contrary, displays no doubt that the cyber assault was carried out by the GRU.
The NSA analysis does not draw conclusions about whether the interference had any effect on the election’s outcome and concedes that much remains unknown about the extent of the hackers’ accomplishments. However, the report raises the possibility that Russian hacking may have breached at least some elements of the voting system, with disconcertingly uncertain results.
The NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence were both contacted for this article. Officials requested that we not publish or report on the top secret document and declined to comment on it. When informed that we intended to go ahead with this story, the NSA requested a number of redactions. The Intercept agreed to some of the redaction requests after determining that the disclosure of that material was not clearly in the public interest.
The report adds significant new detail to the picture that emerged from the unclassified intelligence assessment about Russian election meddling released by the Obama administration in January. The January assessment presented the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions but omitted many specifics, citing concerns about disclosing sensitive sources and methods. The assessment concluded with high confidence that the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort “to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”
That review did not attempt to assess what effect the Russian efforts had on the election, despite the fact that “Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards.” According to the Department of Homeland Security, the assessment reported reassuringly, “the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.”
The NSA has now learned, however, that Russian government hackers, part of a team with a “cyber espionage mandate specifically directed at U.S. and foreign elections,” focused on parts of the system directly connected to the voter registration process, including a private sector manufacturer of devices that maintain and verify the voter rolls. Some of the company’s devices are advertised as having wireless internet and Bluetooth connectivity, which could have provided an ideal staging point for further malicious actions.
She got at least 20 years in prison for this ^^^ information... HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAA
-
We are losing sight of what's important here....
HHWYHI?
-
We are losing sight of what's important here....
HHWYHI?
Not that hard. She's vegan and brittle. Not to mention retarded
-
(https://i.redd.it/mc9h9xfayw1z.jpg)
-
Finally got one.
-
So will liberals like Wikileaks again? ;D
-
So will liberals like Wikileaks again? ;D
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/05/nsa-leaker-is-a-bernie-supporter-who-resists-trump/
-
(https://i.redd.it/mc9h9xfayw1z.jpg)
looks like either a lezbo or a mudshark
-
looks like either a lezbo or a mudshark
Mentally ill liberal loser
http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/05/nsa-leaker-being-white-is-terrorism/?utm_source=site-share
-
So will liberals like Wikileaks again? ;D
Reality Winner, reality bites.
-
No comment from Strawman that she's a left wing nut environmentalist that supported Sanders and a known Trump hater? Haha
-
Liberals all have that permanent stupid smug look on their faces?
Life isn't going to be so cute when they lock her up for 1000 years.
-
She don't eat meat.
(https://s1.postimg.org/c0tggtkwv/nsa-leaker-reality-winner-crushed-weights-as-cro.jpg)
But she sure likes the bone.
-
She don't eat meat.
(https://s1.postimg.org/c0tggtkwv/nsa-leaker-reality-winner-crushed-weights-as-cro.jpg)
But she sure likes the bone.
"CrossFit".......this explains everything.
-
Liberals all have that permanent stupid smug look on their faces?
Life isn't going to be so cute when they lock her up for 1000 years.
-
Liberals all have that permanent stupid smug look on their faces?
Life isn't going to be so cute when they lock her up for 1000 years.
She's a criminal and traitor.
I posted the same views on Manning and Snowden.
-
"CrossFit".......this explains everything.
HAHAHAHAH
-
"CrossFit".......this explains everything.
I heard that training method originated in Russia? ;)
-
I heard that training method originated in Russia? ;)
http://abcnews.go.com/US/nsa-contractor-reality-winner-wanted-burn-white-house/story?id=47912175
Psycho bitch
-
This chick deserves to rot:
Reality Leigh Winner, 25, a government contract worker with top-secret security clearance, pleaded not guilty Thursday to an espionage charge in federal court in Augusta, Georgia, and was ordered to remain in custody out of concern she poses a risk to national security.
A federal prosecutor said in court that authorities had uncovered a series of “new and downright frightening" other acts by Winner, including inserting a thumb drive into her Air Force computer and taking classified information while she was still in the military.
“When you take a thumb drive in a top-secret computer as she did, we don’t know what happened to it," U.S. Magistrate Judge Brian Epps said at the hearing. “That falls into the landscape of danger to the community but it is also a danger to the nation."
“She seems to have a fascination with the Middle East and Islamic terrorism," Epps said. He quoted her as having written: “It’s a Christlike vision to have a fundamentalist Islamic state.”
On social media, Winner has included photos of herself that are dedicated to CrossFit, yoga and her pets. On a separate account for a “Sara Winners" identified as hers, she has sharply criticized Trump, including calling him a “soulless ginger orangutan." :D
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-08/accused-leaker-is-indicted-for-disclosing-classified-report (https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-08/accused-leaker-is-indicted-for-disclosing-classified-report)
-
Thinking about it causes me to become increasingly concerned that Assange, Snowden, and this girl in the same way, are dupes and/or fakes. They're propped up.
Look at the MSM placement of Assange, for instance. No consistency to be found. Something's not right.
-
Thinking about it causes me to become increasingly concerned that Assange, Snowden, and this girl in the same way, are dupes and/or fakes. They're propped up.
Look at the MSM placement of Assange, for instance. No consistency to be found. Something's not right.
I read a very interesting article about the Assange situation. I'll try to find it. But basically it was about his entire Wikileaks "business" and how it operates in respect with American leakers.
But then again that article could have been psy-ops too.
Idk what to believe any longer.
-
I read a very interesting article about the Assange situation. I'll try to find it. But basically it was about his entire Wikileaks "business" and how it operates in respect with American leakers.
But then again that article could have been psy-ops too.
Idk what to believe any longer.
It's really simple:
It's criminal when a military person or NSA contractor releases
classified documents .
Manning and Snowden are criminals along with this Reality Winner.
Julienne Assange had to hide our in other GOV locations because
of his criminal release of classified intel via Wiki-Leaks.
Comey was a private citizen when he sent his personal Unclassified
journal notes to a law prof. That's not criminal and a totally different situation.
-
It's really simple:
It's criminal when a military person or NSA contractor releases
classified documents .
Manning and Snowden are criminals along with this Reality Winner.
Julienne Assange had to hide our in other GOV locations because
of his criminal release of classified intel via Wiki-Leaks.
Comey was a private citizen when he sent his personal Unclassified
journal notes to a law prof. That's not criminal and a totally different situation.
::)
Jesus christ...
-
I read a very interesting article about the Assange situation. I'll try to find it. But basically it was about his entire Wikileaks "business" and how it operates in respect with American leakers.
But then again that article could have been psy-ops too.
Idk what to believe any longer.
I know the feeling, and can't help but think that's where we're to be led.
After spending some time looking at his (Assange's) placement in Big Media, it's very difficult to believe it's all as represented by them. Very, very, very difficult.
And this says nothing of the fact that he could've been hit at any time -- just by way of his consumption of food, liquor, cigs and everything else he puts into his body. Every person he communicates with could be tapped to secretly obstruct his alleged purpose, and so the list of related questions goes on and on.
IMO his story is exactly as Hollywood would have it, not reality.
-
It's really simple:
It's criminal when a military person or NSA contractor releases
classified documents .
Manning and Snowden are criminals along with this Reality Winner.
Julienne Assange had to hide our in other GOV locations because
of his criminal release of classified intel via Wiki-Leaks.
Comey was a private citizen when he sent his personal Unclassified
journal notes to a law prof. That's not criminal and a totally different situation.
Comey now claims he deleted his original memos, and the professor he gave a copy to is in hiding. Totally normal. ::)
The dates Comey mentioned during his testimony don't even match up with the NYT's story on the "memos". The whole thing is a sham.
But Trump is embarrassing the nation... ::)
-
Comey now claims he deleted his original memos, and the professor he gave a copy to is in hiding. Totally normal. ::)
The dates Comey mentioned during his testimony don't even match up with the NYT's story on the "memos". The whole thing is a sham.
But Trump is embarrassing the nation... ::)
Well, we'll see how this all shakes out eventually.
I still think Trump will resign with a bitter attitude .
His staunchest supporters will say he was "railroaded" ( despite the evidence).
to be continued...
-
His staunchest supporters will say he was "railroaded" ( despite the evidence).
Who said that?
-
Who said that?
I did!
It's what I THINK will happen , should he be forced out of office or resign in anger.
I also THINK it's possible that Trump wants an "out".
I THINK it's POSSIBLE that he regrets being POTUS and hates the lifestyle.
I've THOUGHT it was possible he'd fake a serious illness.
Then, after much media fanfare he'll say a heroic farewell due to that (fake) illness.
* Note - this post is just me talking out my ass. I have no proof any of this will occur.
It's just my musings and thoughts posted on this political forum.
-
I did!
It's what I THINK will happen , should he be forced out of office or resign in anger.
I also THINK it's possible that Trump wants an "out".
I THINK it's POSSIBLE that he regrets being POTUS and hates the lifestyle.
I've THOUGHT it was possible he'd fake a serious illness.
Then, after much media fanfare he'll say a heroic farewell due to that (fake) illness.
* Note - this post is just me talking out my ass. I have no proof any of this will occur.
It's just my musings and thoughts posted on this political forum.
You could get a job at CNN/MSNBC
-
You could get a job at CNN/MSNBC
;D
You are one funny bastard. Great reply.