Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:14:47 PM

Title: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:14:47 PM
IMO 2001 still takes it. 
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:18:40 PM
.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:20:17 PM
.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on June 24, 2017, 03:29:03 PM
Solid everyday look that anyone could appreciate
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: ratherbebig on June 24, 2017, 03:31:27 PM
hard to say i think you would need to be there in person
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Leatherneck on June 24, 2017, 03:34:26 PM
2001 by a country mile.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:34:38 PM
Bdb looks thicker in 09
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Royalty on June 24, 2017, 03:35:33 PM
Jay admitted that his muscles looked fresher in 2001
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Royalty on June 24, 2017, 03:37:44 PM
A few more
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Royalty on June 24, 2017, 03:39:57 PM
Some direct comparisons
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Nether Animal on June 24, 2017, 03:41:04 PM
Ronnie looked like crap from the front that year but he still won the back shots soundly
Title: Re: Jay Cutler: 2001 vs 2009
Post by: Iceman1981 on June 24, 2017, 07:40:48 PM
2001 Better shape.

2009 Better conditioning. Epic quad stomp in 2009 though. (Open pic in new tab for full size).