Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on September 12, 2017, 06:52:09 AM
-
Basically everyone but herself..
https://news.grabien.com/story-two-minutes-clinton-blames-comey-russia-wikileaks-facebook-v
-
:D
-
She needs therapy
-
Delusional.
About time to swallow pride, and move on.
Nobody liked her. It's as simple as that.
-
Delusional.
About time to swallow pride, and move on.
Nobody liked her. It's as simple as that.
X2
You can't make us like u Hillary
-
excerpts from her book like she should have confronted Trump for lurking behind her during the debate are pathetic.. If you didn't have the balls to do something at the time, it just makes you look like a little bitch to complain about it later
-
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hurt-clinton-says-sanders-dragged-nomination-fight-135139249.html
blames Bernie
-
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hurt-clinton-says-sanders-dragged-nomination-fight-135139249.html
blames Bernie
On this point, she has a point
-
On this point, she has a point
Had that disgusting communist witch and debbiewasamanshitz at the DNC not rigged it - perhaps would not have resulted in that.
Again - the corrupt POFS thug criminal clinton crime cabal blames others for its own criminality falling apart.
F them - two disgusting pos - and F chelsea too - she is another ugly fat loser.
-
Steve Bannon Finally Says out Loud What We All Knew: Hillary Clinton’s ‘Not Very Bright’
Breitbart ^ | 9-12-17 | Steve Bannon
Posted on 9/12/2017, 2:47:45 PM by afraidfortherepublic
During his Sunday night interview with Charlie Rose on 60 Minutes, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon finally said out loud what many of us already knew: that Hillary Clinton is “not very bright.”
This was actually my favorite part of the interview because nothing is healthier for our culture than the truth, most especially a truth no one dares to speak out loud.
For 25 years, Madam Clinton has been in the public eye, and for 25 years we have been told time and again and again and again two whoppers: 1) Hillary is brilliant. 2) When you get to know her, Hillary is a warm, funny, vibrant real person.
We expect Democrats and leftwing activists to tell us this. What else are they going to say? My problem is that it has been the national media, those who pose as objective truth-tellers, who have been spreading and cementing this fable. It is those who wear the uniform of journalists who keep telling us that this bumbling, fumbling, tone deaf, two-time failure is, when you really get to know her, a dazzling personality wrapped around a super-smart brain.
Granted, I do not know Hillary Clinton. I’ve never met her, nor have I even seen her in person. Nevertheless… COME. ON.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
-
Is there anyone/anything this vile old crone has not blamed?
-
X2
You can't make us like u Hillary
Delusional.
About time to swallow pride, and move on.
Nobody liked her. It's as simple as that.
true as long as you don't count the ~ 63 million people who voted for her
-
true as long as you don't count the ~ 63 million people who voted for her
Were you crying when you typed that out? ^
I hope she runs again in 20.
It will be even that much greater of an electoral college beat down.
-
Steve Bannon Finally Says out Loud What We All Knew: Hillary Clinton’s ‘Not Very Bright’
Breitbart ^ | 9-12-17 | Steve Bannon
Posted on 9/12/2017, 2:47:45 PM by afraidfortherepublic
During his Sunday night interview with Charlie Rose on 60 Minutes, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon finally said out loud what many of us already knew: that Hillary Clinton is “not very bright.”
This was actually my favorite part of the interview because nothing is healthier for our culture than the truth, most especially a truth no one dares to speak out loud.
For 25 years, Madam Clinton has been in the public eye, and for 25 years we have been told time and again and again and again two whoppers: 1) Hillary is brilliant. 2) When you get to know her, Hillary is a warm, funny, vibrant real person.
We expect Democrats and leftwing activists to tell us this. What else are they going to say? My problem is that it has been the national media, those who pose as objective truth-tellers, who have been spreading and cementing this fable. It is those who wear the uniform of journalists who keep telling us that this bumbling, fumbling, tone deaf, two-time failure is, when you really get to know her, a dazzling personality wrapped around a super-smart brain.
Granted, I do not know Hillary Clinton. I’ve never met her, nor have I even seen her in person. Nevertheless… COME. ON.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
yes, never the less we should all believe his opinion is what everyone else also believes
LOL
-
Were you crying when you typed that out? ^
I hope she runs again in 20.
It will be even that much greater of an electoral college beat down.
why would I be crying
just pointing out how fucking stupid that statement was
more people "liked" (i.e voted) Hillry than "liked" Trumptard
that's just a fact
-
why would I be crying
just pointing out how fucking stupid that statement was
more people "liked" (i.e voted) Hillry than "liked" Trumptard
that's just a fact
When the election is based on winning the popular vote then people might take you a little more serious with this nonsensical drivel you have been carrying on about since November.
If the name of the game was first downs rather than points I'm sure Bill Belichick and Brady would be changing up their entire approach as well.
-
When the election is based on winning the popular vote then people might take you a little more serious with this nonsensical drivel you have been carrying on about since November.
If the name of the game was first downs rather than points I'm sure Bill Belichick and Brady would be changing up their entire approach as well.
I'm not talking about the election results dipshit
I'm talking about the claim that "nobody liked her"
that's clearly False given that 63 million people voted for her
Again, that's just a fact. Sorry if you can't handle the truth
-
I'm not talking about the election results dipshit
I'm talking about the claim that "nobody liked her"
that's clearly False given that 63 million people voted for her
Again, that's just a fact. Sorry if you can't handle the truth
Dipshit?
I called the results of the election months in advance.
How you even show your face after carrying on and on about how Hillary was going to win is just incredible.
-
Dipshit?
I called the results of the election months in advance.
How you even show your face after carrying on and on about how Hillary was going to win is just incredible.
again moron
I'm not talking about the election results
WTF man, can you read?
-
again moron
I'm not talking about the election results
WTF man, can you read?
Moron?
This is coming from the guy who uttered the phrase "10 clip magazines" and you're talking shit :D
-
Moron?
This is coming from the guy who uttered the phrase "10 clip magazines" and you're talking shit :D
LOL - bring up a typo to deflect from the fact that you're an idiot who can't read
fine with me
-
I just heard today that she was so confident she would win that she bought a house in New York for her staff to use when she would have retreats after being elected president. That made me laugh out loud. The arrogance of these people.
-
why would I be crying
just pointing out how fucking stupid that statement was
more people "liked" (i.e voted) Hillry than "liked" Trumptard
that's just a fact
true
-
I just heard today that she was so confident she would win that she bought a house in New York for her staff to use when she would have retreats after being elected president. That made me laugh out loud. The arrogance of these people.
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
-
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
lol...hahaha. Oh brother..lol
-
lol...hahaha. Oh brother..lol
:D ;D
-
lol...hahaha. Oh brother..lol
sad right
-
lol...hahaha. Oh brother..lol
wait! you don't think he is a sociopathic lying jerk?
-
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
Total fail on your part to be objective in just how awful and what a pos the clintons are
-
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
-
wait! you don't think he is a sociopathic lying jerk?
lol...who was your choice for President before you bailed right after the elections?
-
Total fail on your part to be objective in just how awful and what a pos the clintons are
He sees it. Like all liberals he's fails to admit her proven lying corruption....you know that double standard thing they keep wanting an example of.
-
wait! you don't think he is a sociopathic lying jerk?
1. You have said way raunchier things than "grab her by the pussy" with your buddies countless times.
2. You give Bill Clinton a pass.
Now please just stop. You are embarrassing yourself.
-
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
Those parents attacked Trump. The Dems put them forward and hid behind him, so they could attack Trump yet look like victims when Trump retaliated. McCain did much the same thing.
It's typical leftwing/establishment tactics. Use some handicap/minority/victim status as a shield to bash some political opponent, thinking that their victim/handicap/minority status is a shield from criticism.
As for the Access Hollywood tape, Trump was right to a degree. Certain women will let you do whatever to them, if you're rich and powerful.
Some call them groupies. Hilary's husband was actually doing what Trump was saying. And she was cool with it, hoping the presidency would be the ultimate payoff for her.
-
Those parents attacked Trump. The Dems put them forward and hid behind him, so they could attack Trump yet look like victims when Trump retaliated. McCain did much the same thing.
It's typical leftwing/establishment tactics. Use some handicap/minority/victim status as a shield to bash some political opponent, thinking that their victim/handicap/minority status is a shield from criticism.
As for the Access Hollywood tape, Trump was right to a degree. Certain women will let you do whatever to them, if you're rich and powerful.
Some call them groupies. Hilary's husband was actually doing what Trump was saying. And she was cool with it, hoping the presidency would be the ultimate payoff for her.
or much more common the women are afraid to call him out on his assault BECAUSE he is rich and powerful
honestly can't believe a fundie like you is defending Trump in this circumstance (on second thought I'm not really that surprised - fundies are world class hypocrites)
-
or much more common the women are afraid to call him out on his assault BECAUSE he is rich and powerful
honestly can't believe a fundie like you is defending Trump in this circumstance (on second thought I'm not really that surprised - fundies are world class hypocrites)
Fuck off you commie bastard
-
Fuck off you commie bastard
still chapped because I gave you good advice not to buy that piece of shit car
If you're going to cry like a bitch at least do it in context
-
or much more common the women are afraid to call him out on his assault BECAUSE he is rich and powerful
honestly can't believe a fundie like you is defending Trump in this circumstance (on second thought I'm not really that surprised - fundies are world class hypocrites)
Trump told the truth, pure and simple. If you can't deal with that, tough cookies.
Funny how you ignore how Hilary's husband actually DID what Trump talked about, with her concesssion/approval. Yet, you've been basically mush-mouthed about it.
Furthermore, for all your YAP about hypocrisy, where is your outrage that your beloved lefties KNEW ABOUT TRUMP'S COMMENTS for eleven years. Yet, they kept their mouths shut, until Trump ran for president.....less than a month before election day.....because the so-called shoo-in was in big trouble.
Trump's so awful for women, that Hollywood let him run the Miss Universe pageant for TWENTY YEARS, gave him a star on the Walk of Fame, and aired his TV show for years on end.
Funny how libs like you get mush-mouthed about that.
-
Trump told the truth, pure and simple. If you can't deal with that, tough cookies.
Funny how you ignore how Hilary's husband actually DID what Trump talked about, with her concesssion/approval. Yet, you've been basically mush-mouthed about it.
Furthermore, for all your YAP about hypocrisy, where is your outrage that your beloved lefties KNEW ABOUT TRUMP'S COMMENTS for eleven years. Yet, they kept their mouths shut, until Trump ran for president.....less than a month before election day.....because the so-called shoo-in was in big trouble.
Trump's so awful for women, that Hollywood let him run the Miss Universe pageant for TWENTY YEARS, gave him a star on the Walk of Fame, and aired his TV show for years on end.
Funny how libs like you get mush-mouthed about that.
Funny how a fundie like you suddenly thinks Hollywood is so moral and cares about character
All they care about is money
can't believe I actually need to explain that to you
Glad to see that you're on the record as condoning sexual assault
Always good to know where people stand on issue like that
hopefully someone you care about is assaulted so you can explain to them that it's OK as long as the person is rich and powerful
-
Funny how a fundie like you suddenly thinks Hollywood is so moral and cares about character
All they care about is money
can't believe I actually need to explain that to you
Glad to see that you're on the record as condoning sexual assault
Always good to know where people stand on issue like that
hopefully someone you care about is assaulted so you can explain to them that it's OK as long as the person is rich and powerful
Hey, genius. If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault. That is what Trump said on that tape.
I know Hollywood isn't moral, which is why they look like imbeciles, getting all outrage about Trump's tape last year, when they knew about it for over a decade. Hollywood has actually celebrated CONVICTED RAPISTS (i.e. Tupac Shakur, Roman Polanski, etc.). Now, all of a sudden, a 11-year-old tape is a clutch-the-pearls fainting moments. Shakur's lyrics make Trump's tape sound like Sesame Street. And now there's a movement, celebrating that particular rapper.
You might be breaking the law here, as I don't think you can't be this daft without a license.
-
Hey, genius. If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault. That is what Trump said on that tape.
I know Hollywood isn't moral, which is why they look like imbeciles, getting all outrage about Trump's tape last year, when they knew about it for over a decade.
You might be breaking the law here, as I don't think you can't be this daft without a license.
I see
so if you rape someone and they "let" you rape them then it's not assault
makes perfect sense if you're a rapist or a moron
-
I see
so if you rape someone and they "let" you rape them then it's not assault
makes perfect sense if you're a rapist or a moron
Again, please make sure you have a permit, before spewing such stupidity. Rape is sexual intercourse WITHOUT CONSENT, DOOFUS!!
If they don't or can't consent, it's rape. If they can and do consent, it ain't rape.
-
Hillary blames . . . . .
-
Again, please make sure you have a permit, before spewing such stupidity. Rape is sexual intercourse WITHOUT CONSENT, DOOFUS!!
If they don't or can't consent, it's rape. If they can and do consent, it ain't rape.
OK, thanks for the clarification
so If I grab your wife by the pussy and she doesn't prevent me from doing so (let's say she's in shock that anyone would have the audacity to assault her or she's scared or whatever) then by your definition of me be able to do that she has given consent and thus it's not assault
-
OK, thanks for the clarification
so If I grab your wife by the pussy and she doesn't prevent me from doing so (let's say she's in shock that anyone would have the audacity to assault her or she's scared or whatever) then by your definition of me be able to do that she has given consent and thus it's not assault
Stupidity personified on your part. First, if you did that, my baseball bat and your skull would become very acquainted with one another.
Secondly, the law says NOTHING about prevention of the assault.
Thirdly, and LOST in all of your utter blatant brainlessness, liberals like YOU kept their mouths shut when Clinton's husband actually did some of the very things you said. And she condoned it. Yet, you were perfectly fine with her being president.
Oh, did I mention that she laughed about helping an actual CONVICTED RAPIST get a light sentence? Yet, again, you gloss over that because Trump's comments....AAAAAAAAHHH!!!!
Apparently, you get more bent out of shape about theoretical rapists than actual ones, and those who condone their actions.
-
Stupidity personified on your part. First, if you did that, my baseball bat and your skull would become very acquainted with one another.
Secondly, the law says NOTHING about prevention of the assault.
Thirdly, and LOST in all of your utter blatant brainlessness, liberals like YOU kept their mouths shut when Clinton's husband actually did some of the very things you said. And she condoned it. Yet, you were perfectly fine with her being president.
Oh, did I mention that she laughed about helping an actual CONVICTED RAPIST get a light sentence? Yet, again, you gloss over that because Trump's comments....AAAAAAAAHHH!!!!
Apparently, you get more bent out of shape about theoretical rapists than actual ones, and those who condone their actions.
what's the problem
Your wife let me do it so it's not assault
-
what's the problem
Your wife let me do it so it's not assault
Go ahead. Try it. Just pray the police get to you before I do.
You, O dunderheaded one, keep making the FALSE claim about Trump's condoning sexual assault, which he did not do.
Then you tried to spin by claiming that women were so scared of Trump they didn't come forward......convenientl y until Trump ran for president as a Republican with a month to go and Hilary Clinton in danger of losing.
It's why is so sweet to see liberals continue to wail and gnash their teeth, because their tactics didn't work. The American people (or at least, enough of them in critical states) didn't buy it and Trump got the win.
-
Go ahead. Try it. Just pray the police get to you before I do.
You, O dunderheaded one, keep making the FALSE claim about Trump's condoning sexual assault, which he did not do.
Then you tried to spin by claiming that women were so scared of Trump they didn't come forward......convenientl y until Trump ran for president as a Republican with a month to go and Hilary Clinton in danger of losing.
It's why is so sweet to see liberals continue to wail and gnash their teeth, because their tactics didn't work. The American people (or at least, enough of them in critical states) didn't buy it and Trump got the win.
correction -both YOU and Trump condoning sexual assault
you were good enough to clarify that "If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault"
so as long as you can do that and the women "lets you" (i.e. can't or doesn't prevent you) then it's NOT ASSAULT
keep in mind this is YOUR definition not mine
-
https://www.amazon.com/What-Happened-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton/dp/1501175564/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1505322602&sr=8-1&keywords=hillary
slammed
-
Got to admit, I was s so confident my fellow Americans wouldn't elect a pathological sociopath who attacked a prisoner of war, a handicapped reporter, parents of a man killed in the war and a person who felt that they could grab a pussy because of their stature that I would have bought that house too... We both underestimated our countrymen
You were confident our fellow Americans would instead elect an unlikeable, corrupt, hypocritical, unhealthy, reckless, pathological liar?
-
You were confident our fellow Americans would instead elect an unlikeable, corrupt, hypocritical, unhealthy, reckless, pathological liar?
not that hard to believe given that she actually received 3 million more votes than Trump
-
not that hard to believe given that she actually received 3 million more votes than Trump
Because there is no such thing as voter fraud...lol
-
Because there is no such thing as voter fraud...lol
And there was no popular vote contest, her entire spread in the "popular vote" came from the loonies in California, etc., etc.
-
not that hard to believe given that she actually received 3 million more votes than Trump
Did she even get a participation ribbon, Mr. Actually?
-
And there was no popular vote contest, her entire spread in the "popular vote" came from the loonies in California, etc., etc.
never said their was a popular vote contest dumbass
just pointing out it's not at all hard to believe that people could vote for Hillary given the fact that she received ~ 63 million votes (3 million more than the winner)
-
Did she even get a participation ribbon, Mr. Actually?
did she actually receive 3 million more votes than Trump?
-
did she actually receive 3 million more votes than Trump?
Did that actually matter?
-
not that hard to believe given that she actually received 3 million more votes than Trump
Almost all from :LA and NYC
That wretched poscuntbag appealed to welfare thugs, govt workers, gays, lezbos, etc few else.
-
Did she even get a participation ribbon, Mr. Actually?
lol ;D
-
Did that actually matter?
actually it does because popular vote represents popular opinion and that does matter when it comes to getting support for an agenda
kind of surprised I ACTUALLY need to explain that to you
-
Almost all from :LA and NYC
That wretched poscuntbag appealed to welfare thugs, govt workers, gays, lezbos, etc few else.
you mean the two states that pay the most taxes and provide the most GDP (CA is first and NYC is a close 3rd to Texas)
-
actually it does because popular vote represents popular opinion and that does matter when it comes to getting support for an agenda
kind of surprised I ACTUALLY need to explain that to you
Sorry doesnt work like that - had the popular vote been the standard - trump would have run a entirely different campaign. That dirtbag cuntrag pos knew the rules and lost. All she had to do was not be herself for a few months. But alas - she is what she is and lost.
-
And there was no popular vote contest, her entire spread in the "popular vote" came from the loonies in California, etc., etc.
I live in a beautiful state ran by mentally unstable bafoons.
-
Sorry doesnt work like that - had the popular vote been the standard - trump would have run a entirely different campaign. That dirtbag cuntrag pos knew the rules and lost. All she had to do was not be herself for a few months. But alas - she is what she is and lost.
again, talking about the significance of popular opinion and popular support in getting support for an agenda
The Electoral College only counts for something on one day ever 4 years
No one is polling the Electoral College today for their opinion on health care, tax reform, hurricane relief etc..
-
actually it does because popular vote represents popular opinion and that does matter when it comes to getting support for an agenda
kind of surprised I ACTUALLY need to explain that to you
What does the electoral college represent then? In terms of an agenda?
-
1. You have said way raunchier things than "grab her by the pussy" with your buddies countless times.
2. You give Bill Clinton a pass.
Now please just stop. You are embarrassing yourself.
actually, I've never said that because of my position I could take advantage of women by grabbing them in the crotch. So no, I haven't said what he said.
I never gave Bill Clinton a pass. I was disgusted that he would desecrate the office of the Presidency by taking advantage of an intern for sex. That's a low life scumbag thing to d0 as a civilian CEO or supervisor, its even more reprehensible as the POTUS
-
You were confident our fellow Americans would instead elect an unlikeable, corrupt, hypocritical, unhealthy, reckless, pathological liar?
Yep, the lesser of two evils
-
Yep, the lesser of two evils
So you think Trump is more "evil" than Clinton? Explain.
-
Yep, the lesser of two evils
According you based purely on your own subjective feelings. She lost Deal with it.
You voted for Hillary ? Lmfao - come on - what shtraight male does something like that ?
-
correction -both YOU and Trump condoning sexual assault
you were good enough to clarify that "If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault"
so as long as you can do that and the women "lets you" (i.e. can't or doesn't prevent you) then it's NOT ASSAULT
keep in mind this is YOUR definition not mine
Wrong, genius. I didn't put "lets you" in quotes, nor did I say anything about letting you meaning can't or doesn't prevent you.
In fact, I specifically talked about a woman GIVING CONSENT.
You, O brain-dead one, tried to spin what I said by coming up with some hypothetical mess about women being too shocked or scared to report a rape or assault. You even dragged my wife into it, in a pathetic attempt to prop your utterly STUPID quip.
-
So you think Trump is more "evil" than Clinton? Explain.
*Trump is a pathological liar. Hillary lies but no where near the extent the Donald does. He was running around 75% lies to Hillarys 25% during the campaign when their speeches and debates were examined. roHe lies when he would be better off telling the truth. He lies without hesitation or remorse and when he is shown he lied he ignores it and continues the lie.
*Trump is a narcissist. I've worked with them, I know they can be successful, they can learn to navigate social settings and survive. He's not one of them. His lack of impulse control coupled with his narcissism is a dangerous combination. It's why he lashes out often times viciously over small infractions against him, or his perception that they are against him
* He is less likely to take input, draw from a consensus of a variety of viewpoints to come to a good solution. He always believes he is the smartest/best person in the room. He knows more about ISIS than the Generals. No one respects women more than him. Only he can fix ______
* He is incapable of apologizing or admitting he is wrong. Goes back to his psychological issues
* While an "outsider" may be a good idea, his ignorance of government is surprising and detrimental to his success. The fact he is unteachable or seems to be (Twitter) makes it even more so.
* He is a piss poor negotiator. His bullying and strong arm tactics might work in the private sector where you have leverage over the other party, in government, being political, being able to negotiate where both sides get something, both sides give up something, doesn't seem to be his strong suit. He has alienated his own party, that's pretty hard to do but he managed it with his arrogance and lack of skill
*As a human being, he has been nothing but a predator his entire career, no care for anything but him and what's best for him. This won't change
Being a leader in a government position requires skill sets he doesn't possess. In my opinion the country would have been less damaged after 4 years of Hillary than it will be with Trump. I am not a Hillary fan, I believe her experience in Government would have allowed her to navigate the presidency with less damage to us.
-
Sorry doesnt work like that - had the popular vote been the standard - trump would have run a entirely different campaign. That dirtbag cuntrag pos knew the rules and lost. All she had to do was not be herself for a few months. But alas - she is what she is and lost.
And had the popular vote been the standard, there would have been a runoff between Trump and Clinton, since neither got 50% of the vote.
Who would have had the popular vote, had it been just between those two? We'll never know.
-
Wrong, genius. I didn't put "lets you" in quotes, nor did I say anything about letting you meaning can't or doesn't prevent you.
In fact, I specifically talked about a woman GIVING CONSENT.
You, O brain-dead one, tried to spin what I said by coming up with some hypothetical mess about women being too shocked or scared to report a rape or assault. You even dragged my wife into it, in a pathetic attempt to prop your utterly STUPID quip.
your quote
Hey, genius. If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault. That is what Trump said on that tape.
So you think Trump first said "may I grab your pussy"
Or was he talking about just grabbing them and getting away with it (i.e. they didn't stop him from doing it)
which one is it?
-
your quote
So you think Trump first said "may I grab your pussy"
Or was he talking about just grabbing them and getting away with it (i.e. they didn't stop him from doing it)
which one is it?
Also my quote:
If they don't or can't consent, it's rape. If they can and do consent, it ain't rape.
So, spare me your pathetic false choice attempt.
The context was and remains consent.
-
Sorry doesnt work like that - had the popular vote been the standard - trump would have run a entirely different campaign. That dirtbag cuntrag pos knew the rules and lost. All she had to do was not be herself for a few months. But alas - she is what she is and lost.
Exactly. If it was a popular vote contest, Trump would have spent all of his time and money in California, New York, and Texas.
-
Also my quote:
So, spare me your pathetic false choice attempt.
The context was and remains consent.
how is asking you about your own words a false choice
can we agree that Trump did not ask for permission to grab their pussy
then, we're just left with what you said which is If a woman LETS you "grab them by the p---y", it's NOT assault. That is what Trump said on that tape.
so what does "lets you" mean to you
again, this is the premise that you chose to support (seriously - only a fucking moron would choose to support Trump on this but for some reason that's what you chose to do)
If they don't fight back then they "let you" do it thus it's not assault...right?
Is that easy enough for you to affirm or would you like to clarify your statement a bit more?
-
Sean Hannity: The real list of reasons Hillary lost
By Sean Hannity
Published September 13, 2017
Fox News
Hillary Clinton was all smiles at the release of her new book, but the failed presidential candidate should be anything but happy, because the book, titled “What Happened,” is full of excuses, lies and fake news.
Crooked Hillary, as President Trump calls her, is in complete denial about why she actually lost the election. My colleague and friend, Gregg Jarrett, has put together a list of 32 reasons Clinton has given for why she lost. And the list grows and grows and grows as Clinton blames everyone and everything but herself and her terrible campaign for her defeat.
White supremacists, voter ID laws, James Comey, Bernie Sanders, Facebook, Russia, WikiLeaks.
“And then let's not forget sexism and misogyny, which are endemic to our society,” Clinton told CBS on its “Sunday Morning” show.
There is an alternative list of reasons for Clinton’s humiliating loss to President Trump. Topping it is the secret email server, on which she illegally sent and received sensitive government information makes the real list of reasons why she lost.
Clinton's team deleted 33,000 emails using BleachBit -- in other words, acid wash -- after being served with a congressional subpoena. An aide also smashed those old mobile devices with a hammer. Can't get the emails from there. Just as bad, members of the Clintons' legal team did give the FBI Blackberries, but those Blackberries didn't have SIM cards in them, rendering them meaningless.
Comey didn’t hurt her on this issue, he covered for her.
Also on the list is the crooked work of the Clinton Foundation, which took millions and millions of dollars from countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE and others - countries that treat women, gays, lesbians, Christians and Jews horribly.
Then there was the Uranium One deal, in which Hillary Clinton was one of nine people to approve the transfer of up to 20 percent of America's uranium -- the foundational material for nuclear weapons – to the Russians. The folks who profited from that deal ended up kicking back as much as $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.
And what about Hillary’s vow to put coal miners out of work and her refusal to campaign in states hard hit by the Obama economy?
Clinton’s own list of excuses is as pathetic as she is delusional. She can't come to grips with the reality that she was a terrible candidate with no message, no vision for the American people.
The real reason she lost? Americans chose wisely on Nov. 8.
Adapted from Sean Hannity's monologue on "Hannity," Sept. 12, 2017
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/13/sean-hannity-real-list-reasons-hillary-lost.html
-
Sorry doesnt work like that - had the popular vote been the standard - trump would have run a entirely different campaign. That dirtbag cuntrag pos knew the rules and lost. All she had to do was not be herself for a few months. But alas - she is what she is and lost.
Yet AGAIN
not talking about the election
talking about after the election as in NOW
popular support is crucial for getting an agenda passed
If you don't think this is the case then just say so but stop going trying to go back to the election and pretend you don't know what I'm talking about
-
how is asking you about your own words a false choice
can we agree that Trump did not ask for permission to grab their pussy
then, we're just left with what you said which is
so what does "lets you" mean to you
again, this is the premise that you chose to support (seriously - only a fucking moron would choose to support Trump on this but for some reason that's what you chose to do)
If they don't fight back then they "let you" do it thus it's not assault...right?
Is that easy enough for you to affirm or would you like to clarify your statement a bit more?
My words are clear for all to see. Only a thoroughbred numbskull (of which you are making a great impersonation) would fail to get the point.
Trump was not talking about sexual assault, pure and simple. And the glaring evidence of such is the goofball liberals who held this tape for 11 years and did NOTHING about it, letting Trump run the Universe pageants, airing his hit TV shows, etc.
Only when he ran against Hilary Clinton and only when Hilary was in danger of losing a month before the election, did this tape suddenly become the most horrible thing in the country.
-
My words are clear for all to see. Only a thoroughbred numbskull (of which you are making a great impersonation) would fail to get the point.
Trump was not talking about sexual assault, pure and simple. And the glaring evidence of such is the goofball liberals who held this tape for 11 years and did NOTHING about it, letting Trump run the Universe pageants, airing his hit TV shows, etc.
Only when he ran against Hilary Clinton and only when Hilary was in danger of losing a month before the election, did this tape suddenly become the most horrible thing in the country.
Yes, he WAS talking about sexual assault PURE and SIMPLE
Grabbing a womans genitals IS sexual assault
If you don't believe me then go out and try and let us know what happens
You're probably one of those idiots who thinks it's not possible to rape your own wife
-
Yes, he WAS talking about sexual assault PURE and SIMPLE
Grabbing a womans genitals IS sexual assault
If you don't believe me then go out and try and let us know what happens
You're probably one of those idiots who thinks it's not possible to rape your own wife
Kathleeen Wiley and Paula Jones? juanita Broderick? Monica?
All women that garbage pale Clinton abused and Hillary the fat pathetic loser trashed.
-
Yes, he WAS talking about sexual assault PURE and SIMPLE
Grabbing a womans genitals IS sexual assault
If you don't believe me then go out and try and let us know what happens
You're probably one of those idiots who thinks it's not possible to rape your own wife
Wrong again, brick-headed one.
The context, yet again, is consent. There is no sexual assault, when consent in involved.
If a woman consents to it (i.e. she's an ABLE and WILLING participant), you can grab anything you want.
Again, being this dumb requires a license. I hope you have one and it's current.
-
Wrong again, brick-headed one.
The context, yet again, is consent. There is no sexual assault, when consent in involved.
If a woman consents to it (i.e. she's an ABLE and WILLING participant), you can grab anything you want.
Again, being this dumb requires a license. I hope you have one and it's current.
AGAIN - where is the CONSENT
remember you refused to answer that question but maybe you're willing to now
We can agree that Trump didn't request consent before doing this so when exactly was consent given in YOUR PREMISE
-
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/47704530.cached-1-640x480.jpg)
-
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/47704530.cached-1-640x480.jpg)
not sure what this has to do with Trumps comments
do you have anything of substance to add or are you just bored?
-
AGAIN - where is the CONSENT
remember you refused to answer that question but maybe you're willing to now
We can agree that Trump didn't request consent before doing this so when exactly was consent given in YOUR PREMISE
Once again, your false premise attempt doesn't cut it. There's no agreement about jack, because that tape gives scant details about what occurred.
Again, you dodge the point that Trump is talking about consent, "they let you do it". You try to spin that into women being helpless waifs.
And you repeatedly neglect the issue of your fellow pearl-clutching liberals, sitting on this tape of such an allegedly heinous act for 11 years while chumming it up with Trump and letting him run beauty pageants and TV shows.
-
not sure what this has to do with Trumps comments
do you have anything of substance to add or are you just bored?
Well, yes. Yes I do. Here you go:
(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1619/3299/products/rape_530x.jpg?v=1480497180)
-
not sure what this has to do with Trumps comments
do you have anything of substance to add or are you just bored?
Considering this thread is really about Hilary Clinton's legions of excuses for losing to Trump, you're not really adding anything of substance, either.
One Bill is still consider a liberal hero; the other got cast out for having the audacity to criticize other black people.
Maybe, Loco's point is that the left loves selective moral outrage. And, they're still mad that the Access Hollywood tape wasn't the death knell for Trump that they thought it would be.
-
Once again, your false premise attempt doesn't cut it. There's no agreement about jack, because that tape gives scant details about what occurred.
Again, you dodge the point that Trump is talking about consent, "they let you do it". You try to spin that into women being helpless waifs.
And you repeatedly neglect the issue of your fellow pearl-clutching liberals, sitting on this tape of such an allegedly heinous act for 11 years while chumming it up with Trump and letting him run beauty pageants and TV shows.
"they let you do it" DOES NOT equal consent
-
Considering this thread is really about Hilary Clinton's legions of excuses for losing to Trump, you're not really adding anything of substance, either.
One Bill is still consider a liberal hero; the other got cast out for having the audacity to criticize other black people.
Maybe, Loco's point is that the left loves selective moral outrage. And, they're still mad that the Access Hollywood tape wasn't the death knell for Trump that they thought it would be.
You're the one who chose the idiotic position of supporting Trumps claim that if a women doesn't fight you off when you assault her that it equals consent
You truly have to be a certified moron to actually believe that
-
You're the one who chose the idiotic position of supporting Trumps claim that if a women doesn't fight you off when you assault her that it equals consent
You truly have to be a certified moron to actually believe that
Maybe they thought a crotch grab was going to get them loot, handbags, shoes, and a fur or two? So perhaps it was mutual. ;)
-
Maybe they thought a crotch grab was going to get them loot, handbags, shoes, and a fur or two? So perhaps it was mutual. ;)
you should give it a try on the streets of NYC and see what happens
If they don't fight you off you can tell the cops they "consented" and see how that works out
-
Well, yes. Yes I do. Here you go:
(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1619/3299/products/rape_530x.jpg?v=1480497180)
I guess anything looks good compared whats happening in your country right now
-
(http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/47704530.cached-1-640x480.jpg)
(https://hips.hearstapps.com/esq.h-cdn.co/assets/15/48/1448376011-o-oreilly-trump-570.jpg?resize=320:*)
-
.
-
Say, "Donald Trump is my President."
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
Say it...
-
.
-
.
-
Hillary Clinton’s myriad self-serving fantasies in her book, What Happened
Bookwormroom.com ^ | 9-13-2017 | Bookworm
Posted on 9/14/2017, 7:50:57 AM by servo1969
Believe it or not, I have been reading Hillary Clinton's What Happened, in which she presents her take on why she lost her campaign to become president of the United States. I didn't spend money on it, mind you. My library had it available for download, so I downloaded it.
Having now read some 12%, I can say that the book is vintage Hillary, a toxic combination of ambition, distraction, uglification, and derision, all told with a cutesy venom that is simultaneously nauseating and boring. It's like watching the job interview from Hell, the one in the interviewer asks the interviewee to explain some peculiarities in the resume and to answer that hated question: "What are your greatest weaknesses?"
After lying about the resume, the interviewee from Hell gets to that dreaded question. As you know, because all of you have prepped for that question, the expected answer is something along the lines of, "My greatest weakness is that I simply don't know when to stop working. I need to remember that it's just not fair to do the work of 12 people better and more cheaply than they could do put together." That type of answer is Hillary all over -- boastful, smarmy, and manifestly dishonest.
Oh, and there's the hypocrisy. On the one hand, Hillary keeps attacking Trump for being divisive and presenting herself as a partisan healer. On the other hand, for Hillary, the vast right-wing conspiracy lives on. Republicans are evil, duplicitous, mean-spirited and, really, the world isn't meant for one as beautiful as Hillary. She's the Van Gogh of the American political scene, a visionary who inspires not only love from her enlightened (but too lazy to vote) acolytes, but the hateful derision of the deplorably evil and uninformed.
Much of the book also reads like a political speech from a 1940s Hollywood movie. You know those speeches. That was the time when Hollywood genuinely tried to appear bipartisan in order to bring in the widest paying audience possible -- and in order to cement a core American identity. Hollywood writers were adept, in movies about politicians, at writing meaningless speeches with feel-good statements about American greatness, better economies, strong national security, and cute little boys and girls in their beds at night. Hillary does the same.
The book is also saggy because the reader is in the head of a women who self-consciously believes her every move and thought has relevance for the betterment of the world. She cycles endlessly between several different personas: vapid political philosopher, saccharine grandmother, poison spitting partisan and, always, a woman who's Pollyanna optimism leads to her being used and abused by a variety of (mostly right-wing) people blind to the purity of her motives and actions.
That's the general tone of the first 12% and I seriously doubt that the remaining 88% will offer anything different. However, since I'd just started this tome, as a read, I highlighted several passages that I thought were illuminating or amusing, so I'll share them with you here.
Hillary says, nicely enough, that George H. W. Bush and Barbara were incredibly gracious as they transferred the White House to her and Bill. Hillary then boasts: "We did our best to show the same graciousness to George W. and Laura eight years later."
I had to laugh at that because I vividly remember (a) that the Clintons' staff trashed the West Wing in advance of Dubya's advent (including taking "W" keys off the computer keyboards), a type of venom within a two-party democracy that reflects miserably failed leadership from within the White House itself; and (b) that the Clinton's were a little too generous in packing, and managed to take significant amounts of White House property with them when they left, something even the Clinton-friendly Snopes site can't quite gloss over. Gracious indeed.
Moving on from that self-serving comment, Hillary launches the first of her regular attacks against the evil Trump. Attack one is to repeat the canard that Trump called all Mexican immigrants racists and drug dealers:
I thought it was important to call him out for his bigotry, which I did early and often, starting when he called Mexican immigrants rapists and drug dealers the day he announced his candidacy. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 152-153).)
In fact, Trump was very careful about what he said. He most certainly did not call all Mexicans rapists and drug dealers. He did note accurately enough that, because illegal aliens deny the American government the sovereign's right to vet people who enter the country, the Mexican government has taken advantage of that fact to rid itself of dead weight and criminals (who impliedly inhabit all places and cultures):
It's true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.
But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we're getting. And it only makes common sense. It only makes common sense. They're sending us not the right people.
Not racism, but common sense about what happens when one country abandons its border and the other country senses an opportunity.
Hillary also expresses shock that women would vote for a man who boasted about multiple sexual assaults. I guess her husband gets a pass because he committed the assaults but was smart enough not to boast about them later. As it is, people like me who have actually watched and listened to the audiotape will quickly realize that Trump never admitted anything. Playing along with Bill Bush's locker-room chatter, he simply notes, accurately enough, that with some women, very rich or powerful men can get away with anything. Bill Clinton would agree.
I can't decide if Hillary is a hypocrite or an idiot when she describes her take on Trump's inaugural speech. Remember as you read it that the person making this observation is the same person who called half of Americans "deplorable":
The new President's speech was dark and dystopian. I heard it as a howl straight from the white nationalist gut. Its most memorable line was about "American carnage," a startling phrase more suited to a slasher film than an inaugural address. Trump painted a picture of a bitter, broken country I didn't recognize. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 160-163).)
A few pages later, Hillary doubles down on her charitable view of the country, by insisting that, when Trump went low, she went high. She assures the reader that would never stoke rage or resentment -- or insult American voters:
But I couldn't--and wouldn't--compete to stoke people's rage and resentment. I think that's dangerous. It helps leaders who want to take advantage of that rage to hurt people rather than help them. Besides, it's just not how I'm wired. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 200-202).)
You know, I'm pretty sure that calling half of Americans irredeemably evil ranks right up there with the best when it comes to "paint[ing] a picture of a bitter, broken country." I'm also pretty sure that her savage attacks against coal miners, white people, conservatives, etc., all evil people trying to profit at the expenses of the various Leftist victim classes, went a long way to stoke rage and resentment. Again, was Hillary being a hypocrite when she wrote those words or is she so lacking in insight that she is incapable of being honest about her own conduct?
And then there's . . . . Well, honestly, I laughed aloud when I read this sentence: "Listening to Trump, it almost felt like there was no such thing as truth anymore." What Happened (Kindle Locations 173-174). Projection much, Hillary?
Hillary often speaks about Bill's practical and moral support. That doesn't stop her from a little vicious back-stabbing. Bill, she says, doesn't handle defeat half as well as she does -- a funny thing for her to say after one has read pages and pages and pages of her practically orgiastic wallow in depression and defeat:
I remember when Bill lost his reelection as Governor of Arkansas in 1980. He was so distraught at the outcome that I had to go to the hotel where the election night party was held to speak to his supporters on his behalf. For a good while afterward, he was so depressed that he practically couldn't get off the floor. That's not me. I keep going. I also stew and ruminate. I run through the tape over and over, identifying every mistake--especially those made by me. When I feel wronged, I get mad, and then I think about how to fight back. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 321-325).)
Speaking of Democrat defeats, Hillary does her usual historic revisionism. She tries to buoy her disheartened team up by reminding them of other historic Democrat defeats before the great Clinton Democrat revival in 1992:
I reminded them about the losing campaigns I'd worked on in my twenties, including Gene McCarthy in the 1968 Democratic primaries and George McGovern in 1972--and the beatings Democrats took until everything changed in '92. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 365-366).)
President Carter, the one-termer who presided over four years of economic despair and serial humiliation at our enemies' hands, could not be reached for comment about his exclusion from this list of political failures.
Moving on, when expressing her horror that Steve Bannon sullied the White House with his presence, Hillary self-righteously proclaims that "The White House is sacred ground." What Happened (Kindle Location 369).
Maybe I'm doing some revisionism of my own, but I pretty sure Hillary and Bill didn't seem to think the White House was so sacred when they were receiving favors and money in exchange for letting people spend nights in the Lincoln bedroom. I also find it difficult to reconcile this reverence for a sacred White House when Bill used the Oval Office as a place for trysts with a 21-year-old intern. (I did a great Freudian typo there, that I quickly corrected, calling Bill's rendezvous spot the "Oral Office.")
It's worth pointing out that Hillary quotes T.S. Eliot twice. Now that we're tearing figures from history down because of their failure to meet modern values -- and we're tarring by association those who look to such historic figures -- it behooves me to note that T.S. Eliot was a disgusting antisemite. Hillary also quotes George Bernard Shaw, a eugenicist who supported Hitler's brutal efforts at racial purification.
Given Hillary's hostility to Israel and reverence for Eliot, as well as her support for Planned Parenthood and her appreciation of Shaw, I think the Leftist guilt by association approach to things makes it clear that Hillary is an antisemite who supports eugenics. Reductio ad Hitlerum right here, folks. I rest my case.
Moving along to Hillary's assurance that she was a spectacular Secretary of State (no details are necessary to support this obvious conclusion), Hillary throws in a perfect Fox Butterfield (emphasis mine):
Despite the administration's best efforts, the economic recovery was still anemic, with wages and real incomes stagnating for most Americans. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 684-685).)
Oh, if you're wondering what Hillary thinks of you, she spells it out. Hillary explains that Obama practically begged her to run so as to preserve his legacy (a legacy, she admits, included a stagnant economy and ISIS) in the face of absolute evil. That absolute evil bit, that's you, the conservative:
We both saw ourselves as pragmatic progressives trying to move the country forward in the face of implacable opposition from a Republican Party that had been taken over by the radical-conservative Tea Party fringe and was in thrall to its billionaire backers. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 752-754).)
My dear, deplorable friends, you are the radical conservative Tea Party fringe, used by unsavory billionaires, to force onto America your despicable goal of smaller government and greater individual liberty. If that's not fascism as Google defines it, I don't know what is.
Oh, and just so you know, that's not just Hillary describing you as awful. That's science:
I knew that Republicans had moved much further from the vital center of American politics than Democrats had, as nonpartisan political scientists have documented. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 790-791).)
I don't know about you, but that last clause, the one about "nonpartisan political scientists," resonates with me just as strongly as if Hillary had said, "People Magazine has proven this to be true."
By the time I got to the above quotation, I think I'd read the word "I" eight thousand billion times. Hillary has shared with us her every move, thought, virtue, decision, and victim moment, narrating herself from the inside out. Apparently, before running for president, she had problems with the word "I" (emphasis mine):
I'm a lot better than I'm usually given credit for, but it's true that I've always been more comfortable talking about others rather than myself. That made me an effective political spouse, surrogate, and officeholder, but I had to adjust when I became a candidate myself. At the beginning, I had to actively try to use the word I more. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 764-766).)
Hillary, whatever else people say about you, they all admit that you study hard and practice a lot. And I've got to say, you've really mastered how to use the word "I." Even Obama couldn't do better.
The delusions that underpin this book continue when Hillary says it was really impossible to conceive of herself losing to a man as reprehensible as Trump:
Before 2016, we'd never elected a President who flagrantly refused to abide by the basic standards of democracy and decency. (What Happened (Kindle Locations 795-796).)
I laughed so hard when I read that sentence that I frightened my dogs. I mean, I was wheezing and snorting with laughter. I looked like Ed Wynn in the tea-party-on-the-ceiling scene in Mary Poppins. Coming from the woman married Bill Clinton, rapist, assaulter, perjurer, despoiler of young women; and Secretary of State to Barack "I've got a pen and I've got a phone" Obama, reading Hillary's defense of all presidencies before Trump's was like being sucked down the rabbit hole and getting beaten about the head by both the Mad Hatter and the March Hare. Incidentally, I defy anyone to point to a moment when Donald Trump has acted unconstitutionally.
I don't promise to have more posts like this. The fact is that Hillary's What Happened is an exhausting read. It's as if she opened up the top of her head and just let spill the self-involvement; the paranoia; the anger; the fascination with her own innumerable, swottish virtues and boring wonkishness; and the spectacular lack of insight into what political forces possibly have destroyed her candidacy and knee-capped Democrat candidates throughout America. As to this last point, hard Left policy positions are inviolable. The problem isn't the ideas. It's that she and her fellow Democrats (especially the others, rather than herself) just didn't communicate well-enough, inspire hard enough, or fight back strongly enough.
This absence of serious self-reflection bodes well for Republicans in 2020, and that's true despite the fact that our current crop of Republicans in Congress is, for the most part, absolutely pathetic. Paul Ryan et al will bark as long as there's a fence protecting them and, when it's gone, they run away with their tails between the legs (probably going back home to pee on their owners' legs):
I'll wrap up here by printing in full size the photo that appears at the top of the post. You need to see a large version to appreciate Mark Simone's comment:
-
.
-
*Trump is a pathological liar. Hillary lies but no where near the extent the Donald does. He was running around 75% lies to Hillarys 25% during the campaign when their speeches and debates were examined. roHe lies when he would be better off telling the truth. He lies without hesitation or remorse and when he is shown he lied he ignores it and continues the lie.
*Trump is a narcissist. I've worked with them, I know they can be successful, they can learn to navigate social settings and survive. He's not one of them. His lack of impulse control coupled with his narcissism is a dangerous combination. It's why he lashes out often times viciously over small infractions against him, or his perception that they are against him
* He is less likely to take input, draw from a consensus of a variety of viewpoints to come to a good solution. He always believes he is the smartest/best person in the room. He knows more about ISIS than the Generals. No one respects women more than him. Only he can fix ______
* He is incapable of apologizing or admitting he is wrong. Goes back to his psychological issues
* While an "outsider" may be a good idea, his ignorance of government is surprising and detrimental to his success. The fact he is unteachable or seems to be (Twitter) makes it even more so.
* He is a piss poor negotiator. His bullying and strong arm tactics might work in the private sector where you have leverage over the other party, in government, being political, being able to negotiate where both sides get something, both sides give up something, doesn't seem to be his strong suit. He has alienated his own party, that's pretty hard to do but he managed it with his arrogance and lack of skill
*As a human being, he has been nothing but a predator his entire career, no care for anything but him and what's best for him. This won't change
Being a leader in a government position requires skill sets he doesn't possess. In my opinion the country would have been less damaged after 4 years of Hillary than it will be with Trump. I am not a Hillary fan, I believe her experience in Government would have allowed her to navigate the presidency with less damage to us.
This is delusional at best. Off the top off of my I can give you 33,000 + examples of how Clinton lied that would actually harm the country.
-
This is delusional at best. Off the top off of my I can give you 33,000 + examples of how Clinton lied that would actually harm the country.
go ahead... tell me how the emails would cause more harm than a sociopathic narcissistic pathological liar
-
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-apos-nobody-said-162406835.html
hqa ha ha ha ha!!!!
-
go ahead... tell me how the emails would cause more harm than a sociopathic narcissistic pathological liar
Seek help.
-
Seek help.
Nah, I'll just hang in another 3.5 years
-
go ahead... tell me how the emails would cause more harm than a sociopathic narcissistic pathological liar
Are you seriously that out of touch?
-
Nah, I'll just hang in another 3.5 years
Why? Name one thing Trump has done - 1 - that has harmed you personally.
-
Are you seriously that out of touch?
I'm aware of that exchange. The contents of those emails they are discussing, and a miniscule percentage were said to contain "classified" information, has not been shown to have caused any damage to the US. There was no indication there was any "Our troops will invade X at 0730 hours" . She was stupid and wrong to use a private server in her correspondence. In any normal year I would say that would be enough to vote for the other candidate. In this case, the other candidate is more dangerous potentially than even that in my opinion
-
Why? Name one thing Trump has done - 1 - that has harmed you personally.
name one thing Hillary did that harmed you personally? That's an odd criteria
-
go ahead... tell me how the emails would cause more harm than a sociopathic narcissistic pathological liar
Are you talking about Trump or Clinton? Or both?
-
name one thing Hillary did that harmed you personally? That's an odd criteria
You are the one who feels the need to hold on for 3.5 years - what is so bad for you?
-
Jesus h Christ. You fellers are sad.
-
Jesus h Christ. You fellers are sad.
Go Hillary...right?
-
Jesus h Christ. You fellers are sad.
Hillary down for the struggle. Poor bae