Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 08:31:51 PM

Title: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 08:31:51 PM
Seems Strawman likes to just not talk down to and shit on tradesmen (Construction, etc) but also what I do for a living, so much that he insists on using “Phony coach” to describe me. I was actually fine with that for the most part ignored him, until today when he gave the reason for it. It was because I use a box squat instead of a traditional squat (which he can’t explain why either) when training ATHLETES. So I thought I would just call him out publicly as part of a debate on not just the box squat but training athletes (philosophy and methodology) in general since I am just a teacher of “tire flipping”.

I will in fact, be also giving some of my responses TO HIM (Strawman) on YouTube as well. Let’s make one thing clear about our resident liberal village idiot, Strawman, he’s a coward. He will hide and although he will never reveal himself or anything about himself (someone did post a pic of him on a certain IG site, but I digress) he will continue to talk shit without backing any of it up. Just a disclaimer, I never claim to know everything and learn from anyone credible. I’ve been training athletes for 20 + years. I have 9 players currently in the NFL, 11 D1 college players and more going after the high school season ends.

Since Strawman seems to think he knows all. These training questions and answers can be anything related to...

Dealing with injuries

Program design

Strength & auxiliaries

Speed and change of direction

Conditioning (for sport not aesthetics)

Flexibility

Now, just to let Strawman understand. I give talks and coaching seminars on these very subjects not just at my facility but different schools and other training facilities. So without further ado, here is my first question to Strawman...

Strawman,  you recently gave your reason for call me a “phony coach” for performing box squats with my athletes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS can you give the reasons why you think you need to discredit myself while giving reason why the box squat is useless (I think that’s what you used)?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 16, 2017, 08:41:56 PM
Seriously, it's just the Internet.

We all bust each other's chops on here. Most here know not to take it too seriously.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 08:47:27 PM
Seriously, it's just the Internet.

We all bust each other's chops on here. Most here know not to take it too seriously.

Strawman has a big mouth. This is between him and I. That commie needs to be called out for his bullshit. This is Bodybuilding, fitness and training site. This is about training on this board. If he’s going to demean hard working people for careers that don’t meet up to his pompous-ass standards he needs to be called out especially when he hides.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Twaddle on October 16, 2017, 08:50:46 PM
(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--26CvFJKe--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/18kx9t3on9n28jpg.jpg)
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 16, 2017, 08:53:53 PM
Strawman has a big mouth. This is between him and I. That commie needs to be called out for his bullshit. This is Bodybuilding, fitness and training site. This is about training on this board. If he’s going to demean hard working people for careers that don’t meet up to his pompous-ass standards he needs to be called out especially when he hides.

Bodybuilding, fitness and training rarely get discussed on getbig any more.

It's strange that you're letting him bother you this much that you had to make a thread about it.

Doesn't seem worthwhile, but to each their own.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: tommywishbone on October 16, 2017, 08:54:13 PM
Wait... is Strawman the gay mexican guy that was just deported?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 08:58:37 PM
Strawman has a big mouth. This is between him and I. That commie needs to be called out for his bullshit. This is Bodybuilding, fitness and training site. This is about training on this board. If he’s going to demean hard working people for careers that don’t meet up to his pompous-ass standards he needs to be called out especially when he hides.

Commie?

Why so angry comrade?

When I need some tire flipping advice I'll let you know

It's hilarious (and actually pretty sad) that you're so worked up about what I think about you



Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:09:37 PM
Commie?

Why so angry comrade?

When I need some tire flipping advice I'll let you know

It's hilarious (and actually pretty sad) that you're so worked up about what I think about you





I asked you a specific question, let’s get this show on the road, son
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:10:09 PM
Wait... is Strawman the gay mexican guy that was just deported?

😂😂😂
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 16, 2017, 09:11:34 PM
(http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/gallery/popcorn-gifs/tumblr_ljh0puClWT1qfkt17.gif)
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOMEPARTS on October 16, 2017, 09:14:25 PM
I hear planting and pulling those Hillary yard signs is a good core workout.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:18:14 PM
I hear planting and pulling those Hillary yard signs is a good core workout.

Mostly posterior chain through RDL’s. If he knew how to get down in the neutral spine position and was strong enough, he’d have no problem.....lol
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 09:18:36 PM
I asked you a specific question, let’s get this show on the road, son

box squats have no benefit in terms of athletic performance
If you want to sell that bullshit to people I couldn't care less (they will figure out the truth for themselves eventually)
one rep box squats are of course idiotic

do I need to remind you that you invited people to "flame on"

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=568993.0
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince B on October 16, 2017, 09:35:20 PM
box squats have no benefit in terms of athletic performance
If you want to sell that bullshit to people I couldn't care less (they will figure out the truth for themselves eventually)
one rep box squats are of course idiotic

do I need to remind you that you invited people to "flame on"

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=568993.0

Seems to be a lot of anecdotal evidence for box squats. I never did them. Box squats have benefits for athletic performance.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=box+squats+vs+regular+squats&safe=off&dcr=0&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjEtv6z5_bWAhXBkZQKHa-dCLIQ_AUICSgA&biw=2034&bih=1035&dpr=1.25
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:35:56 PM
box squats have no benefit in terms of athletic performance
If you want to sell that bullshit to people I couldn't care less (they will figure out the truth for themselves eventually)
one rep box squats are of course idiotic

do I need to remind you that you invited people to "flame on"

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=568993.0

Before I bury you, managed to get through about 4-5 pages when I came across this....

“LOL

I hope you're not his spelling coach

no shit it's not a youtube video and I never said it was

I said you were too stupid to even know how to embed a youtube video much less create one

I squat at the end of my workout (after leg extensions and leg press) and these days don't go above 275-315 but it's not some bullshit 1 rep box squat with 4 spotters

It's full squats for 10-15 reps

btw - why did you post this in the first place”



Why in the fuck would you squat last? Hahaha
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 09:41:24 PM
Before I bury you, managed to get through about 4-5 pages when I came across this....

“LOL

I hope you're not his spelling coach

no shit it's not a youtube video and I never said it was

I said you were too stupid to even know how to embed a youtube video much less create one

I squat at the end of my workout (after leg extensions and leg press) and these days don't go above 275-315 but it's not some bullshit 1 rep box squat with 4 spotters

It's full squats for 10-15 reps


btw - why did you post this in the first place”



Why in the fuck would you squat last? Hahaha

I squat last because I'm warmed up and don't need to go over 275-315

the only revision is that I stopped doing leg extensions in the beginning of the workout

I do that at the end if at all

like I said before if you want to sell bullshit to people I really don't care (they will figure it out for themselves eventually)

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:52:14 PM
box squats have no benefit in terms of athletic performance
If you want to sell that bullshit to people I couldn't care less (they will figure out the truth for themselves eventually)
one rep box squats are of course idiotic

do I need to remind you that you invited people to "flame on"

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=568993.0

1. Not everyone can do a regular squat properly.

2. The box squat when done properly serves several purposes.

1. Teaches proper mechanics to the traditional squat which we do at my school and those with us that go to other schools.

2. Most people are quad dominant using mostly close stance squats. The box squat using a wide stance (foot print of the rack) allows more recruitment of the hamstring and posterior chain. Off the line explosiveness comes from the posterior chain rather than the “quads”. Also, a stronger posterior chain, especially hamstring strength makes for healthier knees because the hamstring is a flexor to the knee.

3. We don’t go Max Effort every week. During most of the off season we do. Establishing a true 1RM in any mainlift sets up for the rest of the week since we work mostly in percentages depending on the sport. In season we switch to prilepins chart
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 09:54:38 PM
1. Not everyone can do a regular squat properly.

2. The box squat when done properly serves several purposes.

1. Teaches proper mechanics to the traditional squat which we do at my school and those with us that go to other schools.

2. Most people are quad dominant using mostly close stance squats. The box squat using a wide stance (foot print of the rack) allows more recruitment of the hamstring and posterior chain. Off the line explosiveness comes from the posterior chain rather than the “quads”. Also, a stronger posterior chain, especially hamstring strength makes for healthier knees because the hamstring is a flexor to the knee.

3. We don’t go Max Effort every week. During most of the off season we do. Establishing a true 1RM in any mainlift sets up for the rest of the week since we work mostly in percentages depending on the sport. In season we switch to prilepins chart

it's nice that you think I care

really

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:55:11 PM
I squat last because I'm warmed up and don't need to go over 275-315

the only revision is that I stopped doing leg extensions in the beginning of the workout

I do that at the end if at all

like I said before if you want to sell bullshit to people I really don't care (they will figure it out for themselves eventually)



You’re training  Bodybuilding, I’m training athletes....it’s not even REMOTELY the same. Do you actually think I would box squat a bodybuilder? All training isn’t the same... damn
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 09:56:55 PM
it's nice that you think I care

really



Bbbbuuttt you said it was useless.... refute what I posted
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 10:00:53 PM
You’re training  Bodybuilding, I’m training athletes....it’s not even REMOTELY the same. Do you actually think I would box squat a bodybuilder? All training isn’t the same... damn

have you ever considered the option that you could not care what I think?


Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 10:03:40 PM
have you ever considered the option that you could not care what I think?




Not yet. You have a big mouth and so far proven you’re clueless on just about everything...... especially training.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 10:10:18 PM
Not yet. You have a big mouth and so far proven you’re clueless on just about everything...... especially training.

you should try to expand your mind to include that concept

I'm trying to help you

this is one of my Platinum Member Life Coaching Secrets

don't tell anyone else
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 10:24:00 PM
you should try to expand your mind to include that concept

I'm trying to help you

this is one of my Platinum Member Life Coaching Secrets

don't tell anyone else

I want to thank you in contributing to the making of a complete ass of yourself and discrediting any of your thoughts about training.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Ted SuperSet on October 16, 2017, 10:26:09 PM
Why bother coach? Why do you care what he thinks?

How can you have time for this, arguing on some obscure webforum. Dont you have a business to run?

An nfl athlete coach dont have time for that. I just dont understand.

This meltdown must be a major victory for strawman, so why post this emotional stuff?

I dont mean any disrespect (this time around) just wondering why you seem so insecure with this post.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 16, 2017, 10:40:43 PM
Why bother coach? Why do you care what he thinks?

How can you have time for this, arguing on some obscure webforum. Dont you have a business to run?

An nfl athlete coach dont have time for that. I just dont understand.

This meltdown must be a major victory for strawman, so why post this emotional stuff?

I dont mean any disrespect (this time around) just wondering why you seem so insecure with this post.

It’s 10:40pm calm down. Strawman needed a slapdown.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Ted SuperSet on October 16, 2017, 10:44:15 PM
It’s 10:40pm calm down. Strawman needed a slapdown.

Do carry on, Sir.
I fully respect your business succes and training expertise.
I wil however continue to call you names in useless polotics threads.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 16, 2017, 11:02:20 PM
It’s 10:40pm calm down. Strawman needed a slapdown.

LOL

The only thing you've ever slapped down is your microphallus
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Waynelooney on October 16, 2017, 11:07:22 PM
It’s 10:40pm calm down. Strawman needed a slapdown.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 17, 2017, 05:54:42 AM
Why not both post current pics and let it be done with. 
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 17, 2017, 05:56:25 AM
1. Not everyone can do a regular squat properly.

2. The box squat when done properly serves several purposes.

1. Teaches proper mechanics to the traditional squat which we do at my school and those with us that go to other schools.

2. Most people are quad dominant using mostly close stance squats. The box squat using a wide stance (foot print of the rack) allows more recruitment of the hamstring and posterior chain. Off the line explosiveness comes from the posterior chain rather than the “quads”. Also, a stronger posterior chain, especially hamstring strength makes for healthier knees because the hamstring is a flexor to the knee.

3. We don’t go Max Effort every week. During most of the off season we do. Establishing a true 1RM in any mainlift sets up for the rest of the week since we work mostly in percentages depending on the sport. In season we switch to prilepins chart


Coach going HAM on Straw!
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 09:24:48 AM
Why not both post current pics and let it be done with.  

This was 3 weeks ago. I'm down about 8-9lbs since then

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 17, 2017, 09:37:34 AM
There is nothing more manly than two grown men arguing on the internet!!

Battle on warriors!!

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 09:40:07 AM
There is nothing more manly than two grown men arguing on the internet!!

Battle on warriors!!

 ;D ;D ;D

Only one man here, he's a bitch.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 09:51:22 AM
Only one man here, he's a bitch.

LOL - apparently I still own a large space inside that pumpkin sized head of yours

how soon until you pull another JoeLoco or MrIntensone and meltdown again?

still can't figure out why you're so worked up about my opinion that you're a phony coach

why do you care what I think?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Ted SuperSet on October 17, 2017, 01:55:39 PM
BUMP because I like e-fighting
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: JAGO on October 17, 2017, 02:51:50 PM
Seriously, it's just the Internet.

We all bust each other's chops on here. Most here know not to take it too seriously.

He has ZERO mental strength.

J
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on October 17, 2017, 03:32:47 PM
Seems Strawman likes to just not talk down to and shit on tradesmen (Construction, etc) but also what I do for a living, so much that he insists on using “Phony coach” to describe me. I was actually fine with that for the most part ignored him, until today when he gave the reason for it. It was because I use a box squat instead of a traditional squat (which he can’t explain why either) when training ATHLETES. So I thought I would just call him out publicly as part of a debate on not just the box squat but training athletes (philosophy and methodology) in general since I am just a teacher of “tire flipping”.

I will in fact, be also giving some of my responses TO HIM (Strawman) on YouTube as well. Let’s make one thing clear about our resident liberal village idiot, Strawman, he’s a coward. He will hide and although he will never reveal himself or anything about himself (someone did post a pic of him on a certain IG site, but I digress) he will continue to talk shit without backing any of it up. Just a disclaimer, I never claim to know everything and learn from anyone credible. I’ve been training athletes for 20 + years. I have 9 players currently in the NFL, 11 D1 college players and more going after the high school season ends.

Since Strawman seems to think he knows all. These training questions and answers can be anything related to...

Dealing with injuries

Program design

Strength & auxiliaries

Speed and change of direction

Conditioning (for sport not aesthetics)

Flexibility

Now, just to let Strawman understand. I give talks and coaching seminars on these very subjects not just at my facility but different schools and other training facilities. So without further ado, here is my first question to Strawman...

Strawman,  you recently gave your reason for call me a “phony coach” for performing box squats with my athletes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS can you give the reasons why you think you need to discredit myself while giving reason why the box squat is useless (I think that’s what you used)?

Straw Man ...for all of his liberal saying was outed by me for being a racist piece is shit after I drew him in with 5 simple words.... ;D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 03:42:04 PM
Straw Man ...for all of his liberal saying was outed by me for being a racist piece is shit after I drew him in with 5 simple words.... ;D

"simple" is the only word needed to describe you

I don't give a fuck if you're black or a queer (the freedom to be yourself is what this country is all about)

for some reason you got your panties in a twist just because I made fun of that piece of shit car you wanted to buy

It wasn't even the fact that you wanted the car but that you bragged about it as if buying some shitting used car was some kind of grand achievement

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on October 17, 2017, 03:48:00 PM
"simple" is the only word needed to describe you

I don't give a fuck if you're black or a queer (the freedom to be yourself is what this country is all about)

for some reason you got your panties in a twist just because I made fun of that piece of shit car you wanted to buy

It wasn't even the fact that you wanted the car but that you bragged about it as if buying some shitting used car was some kind of grand achievement




Fuck off you commie bastard ;D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 03:49:06 PM
"simple" is the only word needed to describe you

I don't give a fuck if you're black or a queer (the freedom to be yourself is what this country is all about)

for some reason you got your panties in a twist just because I made fun of that piece of shit car you wanted to buy

It wasn't even the fact that you wanted the car but that you bragged about it as if buying some shitting used car was some kind of grand achievement



If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't have responded and since he was dead on about your racism, I guess now you can homophobia to the list of socialism/Marxism
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 03:49:54 PM

Fuck off you commie bastard ;D

LOL - I see you're still on your period Jemima

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 03:53:26 PM
If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't have responded and since he was dead on about your racism, I guess now you can homophobia to the list of socialism/Marxism

LOL - you're dumb as a box of rocks

I've explained to you that I don't have to give a fuck about you to mock you

pretty simple to understand but still apparently beyond your comprehension

Try attempting to explain why you think I'm a communist/socialist/marxist

I always find that to be amusing

Keep in mind that you being a butt hurt loser is not actually a valid explanation
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Fuzzy Nuts on October 17, 2017, 05:13:11 PM
This was 3 weeks ago. I'm down about 8-9lbs since then


A Napoleon hat would complete this ensemble.

Face looks like Derrick Anthony....after he died.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on October 17, 2017, 05:18:43 PM
Teacher of 'tire flipping'?

Strawman, I must insist that you cease your opprobrious dismissal of Coach's pedagogical talents tout suite!

(http://i1156.photobucket.com/albums/p571/TimelordHercules/JOE_55__zpsep0zmt6g.jpg)

Is this the face that launched a thousand flips?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Meta-physical on October 17, 2017, 06:27:11 PM
Teacher of 'tire flipping'?

Strawman, I must insist that you cease your opprobrious dismissal of Coach's pedagogical talents tout suite!

(http://i1156.photobucket.com/albums/p571/TimelordHercules/JOE_55__zpsep0zmt6g.jpg)

Is this the face that launched a thousand flips?

More like the face that lunched a thousand chips! Coach hasn't had bags like that since his last departure from the matrimonial home.  :D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 17, 2017, 07:00:10 PM
Vince Goodrum, CSN, MFT, HPP, CEO, enters the arena to do battle!

The question is:

Who will win the internet battle for tomorrow?

Coach is Back
Strawman
Vince Goodrum
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOSshoutout on October 17, 2017, 07:05:38 PM
Teacher of 'tire flipping'?

Strawman, I must insist that you cease your opprobrious dismissal of Coach's pedagogical talents tout suite!

(http://i1156.photobucket.com/albums/p571/TimelordHercules/JOE_55__zpsep0zmt6g.jpg)

Is this the face that launched a thousand flips?

is this supposed to be a man who portrays a picture of health?  ??? ???
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: JAGO on October 17, 2017, 07:23:19 PM
And claims " 18, 19?"  arms . . . What a tool. A fat old man still making muscles in the mirror and lying about his arm measurement.

Marina High Rules

J

 
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: JAGO on October 17, 2017, 07:27:11 PM
Another winner. This guy is a MPF trainer as well ( between bottles I assume )  :(

J
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOMEPARTS on October 17, 2017, 07:33:42 PM
is this supposed to be a man who portrays a picture of health?  ??? ???


Will this strawman gimmick post a pic of strawman already then? Pic for pic - let's go.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Chadwick The Beta on October 17, 2017, 07:38:22 PM
This was 3 weeks ago. I'm down about 8-9lbs since then



Strong
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 08:53:10 PM

Will this strawman gimmick post a pic of strawman already then? Pic for pic - let's go.

Haven’t seen the others pics that’s talking shit either....two gimmicks no pics. 😂😂😂😂
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on October 17, 2017, 08:58:32 PM
LOL - I see you're still on your period Jemima




I'll flatten your goofy ass into a pancake mother fucker.  Show some pictures, chickenshit
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 09:00:38 PM
And claims " 18, 19?"  arms . . . What a tool. A fat old man still making muscles in the mirror and lying about his arm measurement.

Marina High Rules

J

 

Make sure to connect....lol
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOSshoutout on October 17, 2017, 09:08:04 PM
Make sure to connect....lol

is that senile alcoholic looking old geez a trainer for you?
Thats rough
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 09:13:17 PM
Haven’t seen the others pics that’s talking shit either....two gimmicks no pics. 😂😂😂😂

Only a certified moron posts pics or personal info on this board

For an example go take a look in the mirror
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 17, 2017, 09:16:43 PM

I'll flatten your goofy ass into a pancake mother fucker.  Show some pictures, chickenshit

LOL - I honestly can't figure out if you or the phony coach is the more delusional moron

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOSshoutout on October 17, 2017, 09:17:16 PM
Only a certified moron posts pics or personal info on this board

For an example go take a look in the mirror

what kind of absolute moron would post all his personal info and pics on an anonymous message board for others to see. There are savages out in cyberworld who will ruin your life, your business, all of it just for lols. Putting yourself out there on here is no feat to be proud of.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 17, 2017, 09:31:57 PM
what kind of absolute moron would post all his personal info and pics on an anonymous message board for others to see. There are savages out in cyberworld who will ruin your life, your business, all of it just for lols. Putting yourself out there on here is no feat to be proud of.

USC beats ND 10

Btw, text me your number. I lost all of my contacts about 2 months ago and had to get another phone.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on October 18, 2017, 11:17:44 AM
More like the face that lunched a thousand chips!

is this supposed to be a man who portrays a picture of health?  ??? ???

Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 18, 2017, 11:28:39 AM
Seriously, it's just the Internet.

We all bust each other's chops on here. Most here know not to take it too seriously.
Shhhhh!!!.. >:(
 Coach takes everything too seriously. That is why it is fun to fuck with him.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 11:54:16 AM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


I’ll be hiring next month. It looks as though you might need a job seeing the down time you have. New trainers start at $18hr. After 60 days you’ll be eligible for medical benefits
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 18, 2017, 11:58:12 AM
Shhhhh!!!.. >:(
 Coach takes everything too seriously. That is why it is fun to fuck with him.

I am not too sure why he lets Strawman get to him.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 18, 2017, 12:11:16 PM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


If there were an end of year award ceremony for best post on this board this would be my nomination

Holy Shit

LOL !!!!!
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on October 18, 2017, 12:28:14 PM
I’ll be hiring next month. It looks as though you might need a job seeing the down time you have. New trainers start at $18hr. After 60 days you’ll be eligible for medical benefits

Well, pack my bags and punch my ticket!

Coach, no need to reward my admiring support with this most generous offer.
Know that I am in your corner and your indefatigable champion.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: The Ugly on October 18, 2017, 12:48:01 PM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


Ouch.

Savage brilliance.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: tom joad on October 18, 2017, 02:48:00 PM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


multiple LOLs
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 18, 2017, 05:00:18 PM
multiple LOLs

I've read it a few times now

Every line is a gem
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince B on October 18, 2017, 05:13:55 PM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


Now this is an owning of monumental proportions. I offer that Coach looks fine and that he took the photos after warming up sufficiently. Otherwise, that is just some safety fat and not at all considered obesity.

This is humour on an elevated level seldom seen on the net. Surely most of it was beyond Coach to appreciate! Two X 1/2 does not equal 1. What will Coach make of that?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 18, 2017, 05:41:56 PM
All joking aside, Coach does look damn good, especially for his age. Not many people look like that at Coach's age.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 05:51:21 PM
Toward a Kahnsideration of Coach's Face

Esteemed Colleagues,

Though I am forced to draw only from my poor talents, I hazard to say that for Coach there is no distinction between physical fitness and mental fitness. This is what is being conveyed by Coach's face, which only gives us the appearance behind the reality. Does Coach look like he has entertained one chip too many or does he portray a picture of health? If so, we would have to reflect on supporting reasons; if not, we'd have to do the same in opposition. This is the cunning of Coach's teachings, that either in support or opposition to his face, we are forced to reflect on its health, and that this activity is itself a mark of health in ourselves. However, as a first step toward considering these questions, we require a very special sensory and intellectual modality – the capacity to 'see' or better still, to 'read,' which, showing precocity in comparison to his forbears, is a skill Coach was able to perform at the tender age of sixteen and one half.
      Coach is often misunderstood. Sure, it's easy to read Coach's face like a reverse Bildungsroman, in which the protagonist of a novel moves not toward higher and higher awareness of knowledge, but rather to lower and lower levels of ignorance – like a box squat out of which none will stand from an ever-sinking seat. But this would be a careless ‘reading,’ of Coach's face, for he is no ordinary dolt, he's singularly unique. His face reads like that possessed by an uncommon man who happens to be one of the world's top three bearers of commoner sense. Why, consider that by the age of seven, Coach began to construct full sentences, the contents of which were often interpreted as gibberish, but actually served to test the comprehension of lesser minds. "How can he be so stupido?" thought a young and dissapointed Coach about his special ed. gym instructor, slipping into his thoughts the memory of a word from the old country often expressed at him by his uncle Angelo during family gatherings.
      But it is precisely to disabuse others of their cognitive shortcomings that Coach prefers to use a simple vocabulary, though simplicity ought not be seen as lacking complexity. Coach is a multifaceted man, plumpingly so. This is a man who unraveled the mysteries of fourth-grade mathematics while only in junior college! Go ahead and ask him the rules for the operation of fractions and you will be edified to learn that two sets of one-half rep does not only not equal one rep, but also that the multiplier effect produces only one-fourth of hypertrophic efficacy (expressed in the critical literature as a one-quarter Basile or .25Bkqs).
      Dear Gentlemen, I have tried to offer a "reading" of the external contours of Coach's robust face. But as to plumb the depths of what resides behind its appearance, that I must pass over in silence.

With humility,
Kahn


Just got a chance to read it. Gotta admit that was funny. On the other hand I could have a miserable life of Antifa like Strawman
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Kahn.N.Singh on October 18, 2017, 06:12:34 PM
Just got a chance to read it. Gotta admit that was funny. On the other hand I could have a miserable life of Antifa like Strawman

Coach, the voice of the post came to me quickly. I think it was Meta-physical who actually got my Marlowe reference, and my response was based on well-known memes tied to our various personas on this site. The high falutin put downs are, of course, made up and aim to amuse those of us who are familiar with these tropes.

I'd like to think that we Getbiggers are drawn together from our love of bodybuilding's and fitness's positive traits, and it's great to see such variety in our members' knowledge, personalities, and humor. There are enough troubles outside of this board, and we all meet here for a little relief from these worries.

You look, and have looked, amazing. You've managed to create a successful business. You seem like a very good guy.

I wish you all the best.

OK, stupido?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 18, 2017, 06:58:05 PM
I am not too sure why he lets Strawman get to him.
Because he is a midget beta bitch.  :D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 07:46:06 PM
Now this is an owning of monumental proportions. I offer that Coach looks fine and that he took the photos after warming up sufficiently. Otherwise, that is just some safety fat and not at all considered obesity.

This is humour on an elevated level seldom seen on the net. Surely most of it was beyond Coach to appreciate! Two X 1/2 does not equal 1. What will Coach make of that?

In my defense (because I'm home watching the WS and didn't go back to work) this was right after training, I spend my days on a football field and live on a beach. I love the sun. Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: che on October 18, 2017, 07:52:20 PM
In my defense (because I'm home watching the WS and didn't go back to work) this was right after training, I spend my days on a football field and live on a beach. I love the sun. Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol


Don't listen to them ,you are beautiful just the way you are.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 18, 2017, 07:57:12 PM
Don't listen to them ,you are beautiful just the way you are.

Agreed. I said it on the page before. Coach looks good for his age. Coach is beautiful, on the inside and outside.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: che on October 18, 2017, 08:02:57 PM
Coach is beautiful, on the inside and outside.

I agree
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Agnostic007 on October 18, 2017, 08:03:51 PM
In my defense (because I'm home watching the WS and didn't go back to work) this was right after training, I spend my days on a football field and live on a beach. I love the sun. Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol


Props to you, had no idea you were a Druid
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 08:31:56 PM
Props to you, had no idea you were a Druid

lmfao😂😂😂
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Vince B on October 18, 2017, 08:48:31 PM
In my defense (because I'm home watching the WS and didn't go back to work) this was right after training, I spend my days on a football field and live on a beach. I love the sun. Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol


Joe, understand that your photos will be 'used' here. Hope this helps!
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 09:09:51 PM
Joe, understand that your photos will be 'used' here. Hope this helps!

Vince, I’ve been here almost since Getbigs inception. I’m fully aware I’m a target.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Meta-physical on October 18, 2017, 09:24:09 PM
Now this is an owning of monumental proportions. I offer that Coach looks fine and that he took the photos after warming up sufficiently. Otherwise, that is just some safety fat and not at all considered obesity.

This is humour on an elevated level seldom seen on the net. Surely most of it was beyond Coach to appreciate! Two X 1/2 does not equal 1. What will Coach make of that?
I made the mistake of reading it on a busy train and ended up laughing out loud. Another gem from Getbig's peerless professor. And I should state, Coach, that I echo his sentiments, too: my posts should be taken in jest. I mock your incoherent political ramblings (and will continue to do so), but I respect your accomplishments and your training-related knowledge.  

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 18, 2017, 09:36:04 PM
I made the mistake of reading it on a busy train and ended up laughing out loud. Another gem from Getbig's peerless professor. And I should state, Coach, that I echo his sentiments, too: my posts should be taken in jest. I mock your incoherent political ramblings (and will continue to do so), but I respect your accomplishments and your training-related knowledge.  



Thank you
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: JAGO on October 19, 2017, 12:51:17 AM
In my defense (because I'm home watching the WS and didn't go back to work) this was right after training, I spend my days on a football field and live on a beach. I love the sun. Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol


The guy is a dick, but I respect that statement.

J
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 19, 2017, 02:55:19 PM
Coach is beautiful, on the inside and outside.
Do you think all the soapy studs he sexually harass feel the same way?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 19, 2017, 07:42:06 PM
Do you think all the soapy studs he sexually harass feel the same way?

Is that all you’ve got? Lmao
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 19, 2017, 08:02:49 PM
Is that all you’ve got? Lmao
You laugh, but every man you allegedly sucked off is a victim.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 19, 2017, 08:39:47 PM
You laugh, but every man you allegedly sucked off is a victim.

Are you like, 12 years old? lol
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 21, 2017, 10:05:51 AM
Are you like, 12 years old? lol
Why you’re a pedo too? :-X
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 21, 2017, 11:00:51 AM
Why you’re a pedo too? :-X

No, I don’t subscribe to leftist agendas or organizations like NAMBLA. Hope that helped.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 21, 2017, 09:16:38 PM
No, I don’t subscribe to leftist agendas or organizations like NAMBLA. Hope that helped.
Got it. You only molest guys in showers. You like hair on the balls you’re fondling. Glad we cleaned that up.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 22, 2017, 07:39:35 AM
Has this dispute been solved?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 22, 2017, 07:44:49 AM
Has this dispute been solved?

In what?  A lift off between these too.  So far there is not a single shred of evidence Straw even lifts. 

In politics? 


waddamess.   ;D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT on October 22, 2017, 08:11:32 AM
No, I don’t subscribe to leftist agendas or organizations like NAMBLA. Hope that helped.
Coach....NAMBLA aint no biggie :)Burt Reynolds and Billy Zane are part of it.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 22, 2017, 08:31:30 AM
Has this dispute been solved?
Yup. Coach likes hairy soapy balls.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 22, 2017, 10:05:31 AM
Yup. Coach likes hairy soapy balls.

Go Trump
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 22, 2017, 11:28:42 AM
Go Trump
Lol is that supposed to offend me?
If you want to pledge your loyal support to an silver spooned reality TV host, with no knowledge, government or real world experience, 3 marriages with 5 equality dumbass kids, 4000+ lawsuits, 11 sexual harassment charges ( I believe that is more then you?), and , no surprise, a bad president that is totally up to you.
Trump is so bad he makes Obama look like a stud.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 22, 2017, 02:30:57 PM
Lol is that supposed to offend me?
If you want to pledge your loyal support to an silver spooned reality TV host, with no knowledge, government or real world experience, 3 marriages with 5 equality dumbass kids, 4000+ lawsuits, 11 sexual harassment charges ( I believe that is more then you?), and , no surprise, a bad president that is totally up to you.
Trump is so bad he makes Obama look like a stud.

Obviously it did. This is longest of your responses and I only said two words....lol

#MAGABITCH
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 22, 2017, 02:35:36 PM
Love how this was supposed to be a training Q&A call out of Strawman and quickly got derailed by the resident libtards changing the subject. Hahahaha😂😂😂
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 22, 2017, 04:44:28 PM
Obviously it did. This is longest of your responses and I only said two words....lol

#MAGABITCH
Naw I just find it funny how stupid and short you are.  ;)
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Never1AShow on October 22, 2017, 09:36:29 PM
Isn't StrawMan 240IsBack from the pre-election Trump hating days?  The guy who was run off the board for being so wrong so often about Trump?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 22, 2017, 09:54:04 PM
Isn't StrawMan 240IsBack from the pre-election Trump hating days?  The guy who was run off the board for being so wrong so often about Trump?

240 didn't leave because of Trump winning.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Never1AShow on October 23, 2017, 05:57:38 AM
240 didn't leave because of Trump winning.

He "disappeared" a little before Trump crushed Killary.  Never faced the music or paid the piper.  Is StrawMan 2Fatty?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Top Poodle on October 23, 2017, 05:59:17 AM
strawman takes the cake for biggest getbig idiot, much worse than rangerwill or big black cock or doomer or any of the degenerate disgusting gays we've got ulrking in our midsts
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: deadz on October 23, 2017, 11:39:18 AM
Coach is a 60yr old baby starting these types of topics.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: HTexan on October 23, 2017, 11:55:33 AM
Coach is a 60yr old baby starting these types of topics.
Yup. And he melts so easy.  ;)
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 01:33:50 PM
Coach is a 60yr old baby starting these types of topics.

55

Is was a training question to prove he knows nothing and proved by not being able to back his shit up.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 23, 2017, 02:02:32 PM
Both Coach and Strawman are iron warriors who engaged in a bloody battle of wit and strength.

 It appears that there was no winner this time around. These  two Warriors will live to fight another day.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 06:45:05 PM
55

Is was a training question to prove he knows nothing and proved by not being able to back his shit up.

you started this thread because you were butt hurt that I call you a phony coach and a moron

still not quite sure why you care what I think but it's evident from reading this thread that many people share the same opinion

regarding your "training question" we've had this very same discussion at least a couple of times in the past

you posted a video of your kid squatting (and the video link didn't even work which is emblematic of almost everything that you do) and INVITED people to flame on.

you didn't even bother to mention that your kid was doing a box squat until someone called you on it

I merely made the claim that box squats are pretty much worthless for anything except powerlifting (remember you keep claiming you train this movement to improve athletic performance) and one rep box squats are idiotic, especially for teenagers.  One rep anything is almost worthless for anything and certainly not worth the risk of injury to an athlete who is lifting weights to improve his ability in a particular sport.

Rather than give you my opinion I gave you the detailed argument against box squats for sports training from an actual legitimate professional coach

If I recall correctly, instead of trying to address his arguments you just screamed something to the effect of "who cares what he thinks" which of course leads to the response of then why should anyone give a fuck what you think

As I said of the first page of this thread if you want to keep selling that bullshit it makes no difference to me.
Your unfortunate students will eventually figure out the truth for themselves



Quote
Q: What do you think of having athletes do box squats? What about bodybuilders?

A: I never use them. With athletes, you want the most bang for your buck, the highest return, because you only have eleven weeks on average to train them during their off-season. So the choice of exercises becomes really important.

The problem I have with box squats is that their application is limited to powerlifting. The reason being is the goal of powerlifting is to lift the highest amount of weight for the shortest amount of distance within the rules. Essentially in the box squat, your shins don't travel forward. Now I don't know of any sport where the shins don't travel forward for propulsion. So the mechanics of the box squat aren't found in sport.

Do you think all the Westside people are up in arms yet and have me on their hit list? But it's the Bruce Lee principle again: use what is useful and reject what is not. Box squats are the only thing in the Westside system I don't agree with. They only have applications for powerlifting.

Also, any sort of restricted movement pattern tends to change soft tissue integrity. One thing you'll find with people who do a lot of box squats is that they're abnormally tight in the piriformis muscle, for example. In sports where you have to change direction a lot, the box squat will actually decrease your power because you won't be able to use those muscles efficiently.

Finally, most of the athletes I have are highly paid. There's a risk when doing box squats of the athlete bouncing on the box due to lack of concentration. The trauma that can result on the sacral vertebraes could be tremendous. There are just better alternatives. If you're a powerlifter, they're great. If you're any other type of athlete, stay away from the box squat.

Now, as far as bodybuilding is concerned, you can inject box squats sparingly into the training process. They will hypertrophy the thighs and glutes. But bodybuilding isn't an athletic endeavor. Most bodybuilders can't walk and chew gum at the same time. They're not known for coordination!

https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-35
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 06:46:42 PM
Both Coach and Strawman are iron warriors who engaged in a bloody battle of wit and strength.

 It appears that there was no winner this time around. These  two Warriors will live to fight another day.

I have yet to see any sign of wit from Coach is Back or from his prior incarnations as JoeLoco or MrIntenseOne

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Twaddle on October 23, 2017, 08:56:36 PM
you started this thread because you were butt hurt that I call you a phony coach and a moron

still not quite sure why you care what I think but it's evident from reading this thread that many people share the same opinion

regarding your "training question" we've had this very same discussion at least a couple of times in the past

you posted a video of your kid squatting (and the video link didn't even work which is emblematic of almost everything that you do) and INVITED people to flame on.

you didn't even bother to mention that your kid was doing a box squat until someone called you on it

I merely made the claim that box squats are pretty much worthless for anything except powerlifting (remember you keep claiming you train this movement to improve athletic performance) and one rep box squats are idiotic, especially for teenagers.  One rep anything is almost worthless for anything and certainly not worth the risk of injury to an athlete who is lifting weights to improve his ability in a particular sport.

Rather than give you my opinion I gave you the detailed argument against box squats for sports training from an actual legitimate professional coach

If I recall correctly, instead of trying to address his arguments you just screamed something to the effect of "who cares what he thinks" which of course leads to the response of then why should anyone give a fuck what you think

As I said of the first page of this thread if you want to keep selling that bullshit it makes no difference to me.
Your unfortunate students will eventually figure out the truth for themselves



https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-35
thanks man, glad to see youre kicking ass!

you've missed a great deal here on getbig.

Two of our strongest anti-obama, pro-repub voices now support amnesty.
Most of the repubs in the 2016 mix also support amnesty.

Obama's taking heat for wanting to push amnesty alone via exec order, as repubs want their name on it too.  I think the word "hispandering", coined here by 333386/soul crusher, describes it best.

Ted Cruz 2016 is one of the only true conservative voices left.  HOWEVER, after cantor lost his primary on a single issue election (amnesty) to a total unknown with barely any money, repubs are now in a panic about where to stand on the issue.

The (lolzer) repubs on getbig supporting amnesty are now working to backpedal, just as their repub bosses do the same.   Rick perry screaming that obama isn't doing enough to help thousands of children weaponized into flooding our border is emblematicof it all... is that the word I'm looking for?  lol...

everything is mixed up.  Repubs are the new libs.  Crying about collateral damage from drone strikes.  In 2003, they wanted to turn the place into a parking lot.  nowadays, obama hits a terror camp and kills the pizza guy and theyre ready to impeach.

Speaking of impeach, issa has turned pussycat and won't come at obama for the birther stuff, F&F, irs, benghazi, or anything else.  RINOs on getbig as suddenly against it too, because they only do what FOX tells them to think.

Libs are still libs, they suck, but staying quiet has actually served them well lately.  Repubs are too busy defending liberal ideals to realize they're whitewashing the fence while Tom Sawyer spends their allowance...

Emblematic?  That's a big word.  Only one other poster (240 is back) has ever spontaneously used that word on Getbig.  What a coincidence that you and 240 are the only ones to ever use that word.  

Rob, why don't you bring back your old account?  It would be much more fun to see 240 arguing with coach.

 :D  
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 23, 2017, 09:06:07 PM
Emblematic?  That's a big word.  Only one other poster (240 is back) has ever spontaneously used that word on Getbig.  What a coincidence that you and 240 are the only ones to ever use that word.  

Rob, why don't you bring back your old account?  It would be much more fun to see 240 arguing with coach.

 :D  

And same posting style!
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 09:24:59 PM
Emblematic?  That's a big word.  Only one other poster (240 is back) has ever spontaneously used that word on Getbig.  What a coincidence that you and 240 are the only ones to ever use that word.  

Rob, why don't you bring back your old account?  It would be much more fun to see 240 arguing with coach.

 :D  
And same posting style!


LOL

I know for a fact that I'm not 240 or the guy you're referring to

I only have one account and no one posts except me

none of my friends in real life have any awareness of this board or my online persona (I wouldn't even bother trying to explain it)



Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SOMEPARTS on October 23, 2017, 09:29:21 PM

LOL

I know for a fact that I'm not 240 or the guy you're referring to

I only have one account and no one posts except

none of my friends in real life have any awareness of this board or my online persona (I wouldn't even bother trying to explain it)







So what do you tell your friends your mom you do all day at work in her basement?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Twaddle on October 23, 2017, 09:31:36 PM

LOL

I know for a fact that I'm not 240 or the guy you're referring to

I only have one account and no one posts except

none of my friends in real life have any awareness of this board or my online persona (I wouldn't even bother trying to explain it)

Rob, just bring back 240.  Trust me, it will go over well.   :D
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 09:38:54 PM
you started this thread because you were butt hurt that I call you a phony coach and a moron

still not quite sure why you care what I think but it's evident from reading this thread that many people share the same opinion

regarding your "training question" we've had this very same discussion at least a couple of times in the past

you posted a video of your kid squatting (and the video link didn't even work which is emblematic of almost everything that you do) and INVITED people to flame on.

you didn't even bother to mention that your kid was doing a box squat until someone called you on it

I merely made the claim that box squats are pretty much worthless for anything except powerlifting (remember you keep claiming you train this movement to improve athletic performance) and one rep box squats are idiotic, especially for teenagers.  One rep anything is almost worthless for anything and certainly not worth the risk of injury to an athlete who is lifting weights to improve his ability in a particular sport.

Rather than give you my opinion I gave you the detailed argument against box squats for sports training from an actual legitimate professional coach

If I recall correctly, instead of trying to address his arguments you just screamed something to the effect of "who cares what he thinks" which of course leads to the response of then why should anyone give a fuck what you think

As I said of the first page of this thread if you want to keep selling that bullshit it makes no difference to me.
Your unfortunate students will eventually figure out the truth for themselves



https://www.t-nation.com/training/question-of-strength-35

There ya go again, just because Poliquin writes an article you think he’s the “guru” and I’m supposed just back off and concede “ooohh, well, if it’s Poliquin it must right” seek him out and bring him here. We would have nice respectful debate. He would give his I would give mine. I just happen to disagree with him. I gave most of reasons in a previous post within this thread. I still say you don’t know your ass from a hole in the ground about training.

Let me add to my previous post on here (if I haven’t already) when I’m training a power athlete, that athletes vert, standing broad jump, first step, etc does not come from strong “quads” it comes from a strong posterior chain (look it up, I ain’t explaining it again) if I’m squatting wide (as wide as the footprint on my squat racks) and squatting to parallel depth or below, I’m recruiting more posterior chain, add in auxiliaries with GHR, Reverse hyper, RDL (uni and bi lateral) along with a unilateral exercise I’m not only increasing his power exponentially but protecting his knees, hips and low back at the same time, they’re all connected moron in a single kinetic chain. Similar to a pause squat, if I’m using a box squat with a 3-0-1 tempo for example, that’s a shit ton of power coming out of the hole.

Look at a linemen’s stance. Look how he comes off the line.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 09:39:43 PM
Rob, just bring back 240.  Trust me, it will go over well.   :D

this is going to end in tears for you

Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 09:39:51 PM

LOL

I know for a fact that I'm not 240 or the guy you're referring to

I only have one account and no one posts except

none of my friends in real life have any awareness of this board or my online persona (I wouldn't even bother trying to explain it)





You just have your head completely up your ass when it comes to training
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 09:48:43 PM
You just have your head completely up your ass when it comes to training

I don't give a shit what anyone wants to invest their time in doing

for you the proof is in the pudding

if one rep box squats translate into superior performance you will get the last laugh

agreed?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 09:51:12 PM


So what do you tell your friends your mom you do all day at work in her basement?

my mother lives in Texas and doesn't have a basement

I live in San Jose California

you must be thinking about yourself or someone you know
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 09:53:11 PM
I don't give a shit what anyone wants to invest their time in doing

for you the proof is in the pudding

if one rep box squats translate into superior performance you will get the last laugh

agreed?

Yes,  I will because I completely understand the basis from top to bottom of why I put my Systems together the way I do. All of our main lifts are done on percentages.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 10:06:44 PM
Yes,  I will because I completely understand the basis from top to bottom of why I put my Systems together the way I do. All of our main lifts are done on percentages.

like I said

if one rep box squats translate into superior performance you will get the last laugh

agreed?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Top Poodle on October 23, 2017, 10:10:25 PM
like I said

if one rep box squats translate into superior performance you will get the last laugh

agreed?

lol this idiot
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Never1AShow on October 23, 2017, 10:14:50 PM
Both Coach and Strawman are iron warriors who engaged in a bloody battle of wit and strength.

 It appears that there was no winner this time around. These  two Warriors will live to fight another day.

^^^^^^^
Love this stuff!
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 10:15:17 PM
lol this idiot

another "1 rep" box squat aficionado?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 10:29:31 PM
another "1 rep" box squat aficionado?

So far in five pages you have brought ZERO argument. If you’re going to talk shit, back it up.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Straw Man on October 23, 2017, 10:56:35 PM
So far in five pages you have brought ZERO argument. If you’re going to talk shit, back it up.
[/quoted]
LOL
Team 1 rep box squat for the win
Aren't you concerned you're giving away the secret to your Superstar factory?
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 23, 2017, 11:24:07 PM
So far in five pages you have brought ZERO argument. If you’re going to talk shit, back it up.
[/quoted]
LOL
Team 1 rep box squat for the win
Aren't you concerned you're giving away the secret to your Superstar factory?


Lmao...even if I told you, you couldn’t figure it out.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Top Poodle on October 24, 2017, 12:11:12 AM
So far in five pages you have brought ZERO argument. If you’re going to talk shit, back it up.

he's antifa commie socialist, he can't back anything up.

doesn't possess the innate capabilities to
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Primemuscle on October 24, 2017, 12:42:13 AM
Plus, well fuck, I'm 55 years old. I don't expect to look 25.

I find it funny tho that I have a bunch men probably close to half my age or younger making comments about my face......lol


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=637976.0;attach=747399;image)

Good photo.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Primemuscle on October 24, 2017, 12:53:05 AM
Even as he aged and was bloated, there was something compelling about Marlon Brando.

(https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/480xn/p04p7m67.jpg)
 
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Primemuscle on October 24, 2017, 01:03:12 AM
I don't know about one rep box squats, but I find them useful as a gauge for making sure I get my thighs parallel or below when going back to squatting after a layoff or increasing the weight. My back is compromised because of degenerative disc disease (old age), yet I've never put it out doing squats.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 24, 2017, 04:49:44 AM
So far in five pages you have brought ZERO argument. If you’re going to talk shit, back it up.
[/quoted]
LOL
Team 1 rep box squat for the win
Aren't you concerned you're giving away the secret to your Superstar factory?


In the working out department - this is not a fight you are going to win w coach
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 24, 2017, 09:24:29 AM
When I envision Coach is Back vs. Strawman, this is what I see (pic below). These two brave warriors are battling it out over the internet! Only one warrior will come out on top, in glorious triumph! Who will it be?!?!

(https://dncache-mauganscorp.netdna-ssl.com/thumbseg/778/778364-bigthumbnail.jpg)
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: Coach is Back! on October 24, 2017, 09:27:13 AM
When I envision Coach is Back vs. Strawman, this is what I see (pic below). These two brave warriors are battling it out over the internet! Only one warrior will come out on top, in glorious triumph! Who will it be?!?!

(https://dncache-mauganscorp.netdna-ssl.com/thumbseg/778/778364-bigthumbnail.jpg)

 ::)

We've already establish this. I'm sure he's back in his dwellings getting ready to post up how much of a man he is from the Castro District.
Title: Re: Strawman Vs. Coach is back
Post by: SF1900 on October 24, 2017, 09:32:24 AM
^^^^^^^
Love this stuff!

Yes, only on getbig will two men engage in an epic battle of right vs. wrong and strength vs. weakness. Most battles on getbig remain undecided! This is a true testament to the wit and perseverance of getbiggers--despite the endless battle, they rise up, with torn clothes, wounds, and blood dripping off of them. But, they know, that at the end of the day, they are getbiggers. They go where others do not.