Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: doggler on November 03, 2017, 04:26:41 PM

Title: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: doggler on November 03, 2017, 04:26:41 PM
                          MAIN CARD

 Michael Bisping (c) (30-7) vs. Georges St-Pierre (25-2)*
 Cody Garbrandt (c) (11-0) vs. TJ Dillashaw (15-3)**
 Joanna Jedrzejczyk (c) (14-0) vs. Rose Namajunas (7-3)***
 Stephen Thompson (13-2-1) vs. Jorge Masvidal (32-12)
 Johny Hendricks (18-7) vs. Paulo Henrique Borrachinha (10-0)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: polychronopolous on November 03, 2017, 04:37:57 PM
                          MAIN CARD

 Michael Bisping (c) (30-7) vs. Georges St-Pierre (25-2)*
 Cody Garbrandt (c) (11-0) vs. TJ Dillashaw (15-3)**
 Joanna Jedrzejczyk (c) (14-0) vs. Rose Namajunas (7-3)***
 Stephen Thompson (13-2-1) vs. Jorge Masvidal (32-12)
 Johny Hendricks (18-7) vs. Paulo Henrique Borrachinha (10-0)


Englishman
Snake in the Grass
Champion
Wonderboy
Bigg Rigg
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 03, 2017, 04:39:07 PM
Englishman
Snake in the Grass
Champion
Wonderboy
Bigg Rigg

che could beat all their asses
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Shizzo on November 03, 2017, 04:40:13 PM
Chaos outing his "doggler" account?....... :-\
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: doggler on November 03, 2017, 04:49:47 PM


Bisping
Garbrandt
Joanna
Thompson
Borrachinha


Shizzo you are a moron.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: polychronopolous on November 03, 2017, 04:52:23 PM
che could beat all their asses

Like this?

(https://media.giphy.com/media/uviDuO6lhHY1W/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 03, 2017, 05:03:06 PM
Like this?

(https://media.giphy.com/media/uviDuO6lhHY1W/giphy.gif)

 ;D

heard his uppercut was more deadly
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Mr.1derful on November 03, 2017, 05:05:28 PM
Hendricks will lose bad.  He's finished.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: oldtimer1 on November 03, 2017, 05:13:26 PM
It's sad to see a fighter go past their prime. They all do. Their heart tells them they can still do it but their body isn't there anymore. They all go through it.  Fighting takes a toll. St-Pierre is going to be humiliated and beaten badly.  He should just go down in history and take his place in the hall of fame but he thinks he can still do it. It's going to be ugly. It's not an age thing. It's an odometer thing. He has to many battles under his belt.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Royalty on November 03, 2017, 05:18:49 PM
It's sad to see a fighter go past their prime. They all do. Their heart tells them they can still do it but their body isn't there anymore. They all go through it.  Fighting takes a toll. St-Pierre is going to be humiliated and beaten badly.  He should just go down in history and take his place in the hall of fame but he thinks he can still do it. It's going to be ugly. It's not an age thing. It's an odometer thing. He has to many battles under his belt.

No offense but your logic is flawed. GSP has been in far fewer fights than Bisping. And GSP is younger.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: oldtimer1 on November 03, 2017, 05:22:48 PM
No offense but your logic is flawed. GSP has been in far fewer fights than Bisping. And GSP is younger.
Like I said age doesn't have anything to do with it. It has to do with how many wars they have been in. GSP has been fighting at a high level a lot longer than Bisping.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: doggler on November 03, 2017, 05:27:41 PM
Hendricks will lose bad.  He's finished.

He's never been the same after USADA started testing. Still remember when his kicked St:Pierre's ass.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 03, 2017, 05:30:40 PM
                          MAIN CARD

 Michael Bisping (c) (30-7) vs. Georges St-Pierre (25-2)*
 Cody Garbrandt (c) (11-0) vs. TJ Dillashaw (15-3)**
 Joanna Jedrzejczyk (c) (14-0) vs. Rose Namajunas (7-3)***
 Stephen Thompson (13-2-1) vs. Jorge Masvidal (32-12)
 Johny Hendricks (18-7) vs. Paulo Henrique Borrachinha (10-0)


Canadian
Snake in the Grass
Champion
Wonderboy
Paulo Costa
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 03, 2017, 05:52:17 PM
I'm pretty sure we can still use the odometre argument for Bisping.  He is older and has the most UFC wins in history.  He is two years older than St-Pierre.  St-Pierre has been training hard for the past four years, but not taking beatings in UFC fights.  That could be a plus or a minus.  I would bet money on St-Pierre.  I don't necessarily consider it to be an easy fight for him - I think it is a pretty good match-up.

Sad about John Hendricks though - at the end of his fight with St-Pierre at UFC 167, GSP, upon being announced winner, said to Hendricks "You gave me my toughest fight."  It's hard to hear, but if you pay attention to St-Pierre closely, you can hear him say it.  That was a nice thing for GSP to do, to console the loser of the fight like that.  Although many would argue that Hendricks won.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: cephissus on November 03, 2017, 06:00:41 PM
I have a feeling tj will get blown out and rose/jj will be closer than anyone expects. Regardless, I hope tj and bisping do well.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: 20inch calves on November 03, 2017, 06:42:01 PM
I really hope Cody wins. I truly believe tj is a snake. I'm rooting for gsp too. I think Cody WILL win not sure about gsp though
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 03, 2017, 08:53:04 PM
Bisping - that fight against Henderson aged him 10 years.  ;D
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 03, 2017, 09:10:32 PM
Bisping - that fight against Henderson aged him 10 years.  ;D

Hmm?  If it aged Bisping 10 years, why would you be so confident he will win?  I found it interesting that both him and GSP weighed in at the same weight - 184.5-lb.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Tennisballz on November 03, 2017, 10:33:26 PM
I remember hearing on a podcast that GSP was considering going down in weight to 155 at one point.  I dont see him doing well against Bisping who is bigger and a tough veteran.  Especially after a long layoff.  I wonder if GSP picked Bisping himself?  He surely could fight Woodley for the 170 belt I would think.  Dont know why he isn't...
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 03, 2017, 10:45:53 PM
Hmm?  If it aged Bisping 10 years, why would you be so confident he will win?  I found it interesting that both him and GSP weighed in at the same weight - 184.5-lb.


It's just a comment, never said anything about him winning. Ring rust is real though and so is drug testing so GSP may not be the same. Obviously GSP's wrestling is top notch so have to see where fight goes standing or on mat.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 03, 2017, 10:59:24 PM
I remember hearing on a podcast that GSP was considering going down in weight to 155 at one point.  I dont see him doing well against Bisping who is bigger and a tough veteran.  Especially after a long layoff.  I wonder if GSP picked Bisping himself?  He surely could fight Woodley for the 170 belt I would think.  Dont know why he isn't...

He thinks Bisping will be easier, I suspect.  Also, if he beats Bisping, he would become a multi-belt winner.  I believe that would make him the fourth in UFC history.  I also believe that Bisping only after his fight with Henderson II, beat GSP's record of most UFC wins.  So GSP would then tie Bisping and be once again the record-holder, albeit a tie.

After a Bisping win, GSP could fight McGregor in a catch-weight big money fight.  Or he could go down to 155 and legitimately claim the 155 title to, which would make him a 3-class belt winner - something never before seen in UFC history.

Funny how they both weighed in at 184.5, with Bisping being 2.5" taller, and everyone saying Bisping is so much bigger.  GSP will be around 195 for the fight later today, and Bisping will be, what, 205 or so?  I'm just curious, but wouldn't it just be a 10-lb weight disparity?  If you adjust for height, it's not like the actual muscle or weight per inch of height is much different.  Also, why is sheer body weight so important?  I understand that body weight itself does help, but does strength mean absolutely nothing?  As far as I am aware, GSP is stronger than Bisping, even if only positionally stronger - that being, knows how to use angles to his advantage.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 06:18:12 AM
https://i.imgur.com/vpdDykH.jpg (https://i.imgur.com/vpdDykH.jpg)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 04, 2017, 07:18:53 AM
https://i.imgur.com/vpdDykH.jpg (https://i.imgur.com/vpdDykH.jpg)

Bah.  It shows up as a dead link.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 07:38:25 AM
Bah.  It shows up as a dead link.

Refresh / Press Enter again in the adressfield.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 04, 2017, 07:55:30 AM

It's just a comment, never said anything about him winning. Ring rust is real though and so is drug testing so GSP may not be the same. Obviously GSP's wrestling is top notch so have to see where fight goes standing or on mat.

Great post, SOMEPARTS.  I read this earlier, but was surprised to see I had not replied.  I think a lot of Getbig comprises reading and appreciating, but not joining in the discussion.  It sometimes makes good posts like yours not get the credit that they deserve.

Refresh / Press Enter again in the adressfield.

Ah - got it now.  :D

What am I looking for here?  Does he have a parsh?  ;D :-X
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: che on November 04, 2017, 08:18:08 AM
Like this?

(http://[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UgoEbODm_Pw/U2CJ8orp8MI/AAAAAAAAGHY/swYcw6E0Bko/s1600/FistOfLegend-15-400-sg.gif)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UgoEbODm_Pw/U2CJ8orp8MI/AAAAAAAAGHY/swYcw6E0Bko/s1600/FistOfLegend-15-400-sg.gif)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 08:20:22 AM
Great post, SOMEPARTS.  I read this earlier, but was surprised to see I had not replied.  I think a lot of Getbig comprises reading and appreciating, but not joining in the discussion.  It sometimes makes good posts like yours not get the credit that they deserve.

Ah - got it now.  :D

What am I looking for here?  Does he have a parsh?  ;D :-X

He's a 5'5 fighter trying to become 5'8 (utilizing the Canning-methods) while being interviewed by a female.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 08:21:03 AM
kicking is for fags, real men strike with their fists
Like this?

(http://[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UgoEbODm_Pw/U2CJ8orp8MI/AAAAAAAAGHY/swYcw6E0Bko/s1600/FistOfLegend-15-400-sg.gif)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UgoEbODm_Pw/U2CJ8orp8MI/AAAAAAAAGHY/swYcw6E0Bko/s1600/FistOfLegend-15-400-sg.gif)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: che on November 04, 2017, 08:33:40 AM
kicking is for fags, real men strike with their fists
Wrong, there are no rules to a street fight.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 08:36:22 AM
Wrong, there are no rules to a street fight.

yep, thats true

best to carry a gun in that case
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: che on November 04, 2017, 08:41:02 AM
yep, thats true

best to carry a gun in that case
Guns are for fags ,real men strike with  hands and feet
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 08:47:12 AM
Guns are for fags ,real men strike with  hands and feet

 ;D

thats true

my coach wanted to show me some street fighting skills like blocking with point of elbow to break fists amd some grappling shit but i wasnt up for that

just wanted to practice the sweet science and only the sweet science
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 04, 2017, 03:09:44 PM
;D

thats true

my coach wanted to show me some street fighting skills like blocking with point of elbow to break fists amd some grappling shit but i wasnt up for that

just wanted to practice the sweet science and only the sweet science

have you forgotten you only boxed for 4 months?
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 03:15:51 PM
have you forgotten you only boxed for 4 months?

true but we practiced 4-5 times a week
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 04, 2017, 03:21:10 PM
true but we practiced 4-5 times a week
THE BLINK OF AN EYE YOU FOOL.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 03:23:40 PM
THE BLINK OF AN EYE YOU FOOL.

well no shit

luckily i never had to spar with che
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: hp31 on November 04, 2017, 08:42:03 PM
WOW...Rose w/ the TKO victory. Did not see that one coming.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 08:43:57 PM
VERY nice TKO by Thug Rose!
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Schnauzer on November 04, 2017, 08:50:20 PM
VERY nice TKO by Thug Rose!


(https://usatmmajunkie.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/rose-namajunas-ufc-195-qa-2.jpg?w=640)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 09:04:48 PM
THE SNAKE WINS!


So long necktats
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 04, 2017, 09:43:31 PM
G S P!!
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: James on November 04, 2017, 09:43:55 PM
Not a good night for the shit talkers.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: hp31 on November 04, 2017, 09:44:58 PM
GSP is back!
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Disgusted on November 04, 2017, 09:45:40 PM
Yep  ;D
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: johnny1 on November 04, 2017, 09:52:22 PM
Yup guess sometimes it’s best too shut it and let your actions do the job when it counts in the ring-cage-street.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: TRIX on November 04, 2017, 09:54:24 PM
when you start to believe there own hype - they lose.....

gsp looked really ordinary, i can see him getting knocked out by a better striker
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: rocket on November 04, 2017, 09:56:25 PM
Commentators disappoint me.

Anybody watching that fight could see that GSP was running out of gas.  Yeah, he won, but the "amazing performance" shit.. come on, he was very close to being utterly gassed and out of the fight.  Bisping.. I've never liked to watch, but the dude was going to win the marathon, no doubt.

But instead, GSP gets in a good hit and that's it.

Now they build up GSP to be immortal and sell more PPVs based on exaggeration.

This is why a lot of people, including myself have tired of watching fighting.  Because the fact is, it's 90% based on exaggeration.  It's a game of very fine margins and to make out like these people are unbeatable is most often just bullshit.  It doesn't pay to tell the truth that Bisping could well have won in the later rounds.




Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: The Keto Kid on November 04, 2017, 09:57:05 PM
How did he win? Ko?
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: keanu on November 04, 2017, 09:57:16 PM
GSP is back but you can see where the sport has evolved. He had problems keeping Bisping on the ground and when he did Bisping cut his face up. I remember the days where GSP would take someone down, hold him there easily all fight and just pound away. Good for GSP that he landed the big hook, and had Bisping out. Rounds 4 and 5 may have been ugly.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: rocket on November 04, 2017, 09:58:05 PM
How did he win? Ko?
Left hook, dropped, ground and pound, choked.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 09:58:20 PM

(https://usatmmajunkie.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/rose-namajunas-ufc-195-qa-2.jpg?w=640)

that pussy looks very lickable
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: keanu on November 04, 2017, 10:01:34 PM
Lickable? She looks like she would be the one licking pussy.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 04, 2017, 10:03:49 PM
Lickable? She looks like she would be the one licking pussy.

but its hot as fuck her wider hips and narrow waist

and i bet she has a hot round firm bubble ass too boot
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: The Keto Kid on November 04, 2017, 10:05:19 PM
Left hook, dropped, ground and pound, choked.

Awesome, Bisping was a dick the entire time leading up to the fight and he was just trying to hard to talk shit, trying to emulate Mcgregor , but it just came off as annoying more than anything, theres an art to talking shit, in this fight he just tried to hard. Should be interesting to see how he handles this loss, his next podcast should be very interesting/humiliating for him.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Shizzo on November 04, 2017, 10:05:42 PM
If I was a betting man, I would have put it all on GSP, without hesitation.

There would be no point in bringing him back, if he lost in his first fight.

Now he is the champion......

Hope you didn't pay for that.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: The Keto Kid on November 04, 2017, 10:08:18 PM
If I was a betting man, I would have put it all on GSP, without hesitation.

There would be no point in bringing him back, if he lost in his first fight.

Now he is the champion......

Hope you didn't pay for that.
Bisping was the underdog
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: James on November 04, 2017, 10:10:37 PM
after the fight:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DN1_Hm9VQAA721_?format=jpg)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 04, 2017, 10:11:49 PM
Commentators disappoint me.

Anybody watching that fight could see that GSP was running out of gas.  Yeah, he won, but the "amazing performance" shit.. come on, he was very close to being utterly gassed and out of the fight.  Bisping.. I've never liked to watch, but the dude was going to win the marathon, no doubt.

But instead, GSP gets in a good hit and that's it.

Now they build up GSP to be immortal and sell more PPVs based on exaggeration.

This is why a lot of people, including myself have tired of watching fighting.  Because the fact is, it's 90% based on exaggeration.  It's a game of very fine margins and to make out like these people are unbeatable is most often just bullshit.  It doesn't pay to tell the truth that Bisping could well have won in the later rounds.

I agree about GSP running out of gas, but based on that flurry of strikes just before the choke, it was clear he got a second wind.  If I had to guess, GSP would have found a way to go the distance and win by decision, had it not ended the way it did.  GSP was winning the fight even while, as you said, he looked like he was running out of gas.

I also think you could really see the disparity in body weight in this fight.  I felt that while GSP was successful with his takedowns, you could tell he was taking down a heavier man.  I could sense that GSP was doing things that a welterweight fighter would not have had the body weight to as easily defend.  Body weight helps in fights!  I used to think it was all that matters, then thought it barely mattered at all - but yes, it matters quite a bit.

PS - GSP's face was really busted up [picture attached below].  :-[  What an amazing champion.

How did he win? Ko?

Technical submission [read-naked choke],  He choked out Bisping after laying waste to him with a series of strikes.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Shizzo on November 04, 2017, 10:17:05 PM
Bisping was the underdog
Doesn't matter. Bisping lost before entering the octagon.

I really used to love MMA, but with the mafia ties with Pride, the utter shit that Bellator puts out, and the growing sentiment that hype (Not the results) sells fights, I am worried about the integrity of the sport.

You start to ask yourself: Is MMA really that much harder to choreograph than professional wrestling? We all saw it on display in the McGregor vs. Mayweather fiasco.

Boxing has long been accused of being corrupt as well. When push comes to punch, are the consumers being lied to?

Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 04, 2017, 10:17:53 PM
I'm pleased by the result of Bisping and GSP.

Also, I would like to put my dick inside Rose.

(http://www2.cdn.sherdog.com/_images/pictures/20130104065059_10_Rose_Namajunas.JPG)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: The Keto Kid on November 04, 2017, 10:25:02 PM
Doesn't matter. Bisping lost before entering the octagon.

I really used to love MMA, but with the mafia ties with Pride, the utter shit that Bellator puts out, and the growing sentiment that hype (Not the results) sells fights, I am worried about the integrity of the sport.

You start to ask yourself: Is MMA really that much harder to choreograph than professional wrestling? We all saw it on display in the McGregor vs. Mayweather fiasco.

Boxing has long been accused of being corrupt as well. When push comes to punch, are the consumers being lied to?


I agree and I think back in the day you couldn't bet on UFC, like when Shamrock and Gracie, etc.. there wasn't Vegas odds on those fights, once Vegas gets involved it messes with the integrity of the sport. I will say this, Vegas lost a lot tonight, I'm sure tons of people took Bisping, Cody, and Joanna.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: gmflex on November 04, 2017, 10:26:39 PM
Uncle Dana..
Has a new cash cow...
GSP...
 ;D  ;D
He needs one..
With Conor asking for a lot..
He needs to have an alternative cash cow..
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Shizzo on November 04, 2017, 10:30:38 PM
I agree and I think back in the day you couldn't bet on UFC, like when Shamrock and Gracie, etc.. there wasn't Vegas odds on those fights, once Vegas gets involved it messes with the integrity of the sport. I will say this, Vegas lost a lot tonight, I'm sure tons of people took Bisping, Cody, and Joanna.
Normal people may have. But insiders bet heavily towards the people they knew would win.

Stocks, and gambling are geared towards rich people with connections. Sure, you can get some average Joe's, who get lucky, but it's only insiders that truly benefit.

Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Mr.1derful on November 04, 2017, 10:31:59 PM
GSP was too heavy here.  You could see his energy drop off quick early on.  He wisely capitalized when Bisping went down and elbowed the shit out of him before getting the rear naked choke.  If not for that, it wasn't looking good.  Fair play though, he had 4 years off and went up in weight and won.  He kept composed even while busted open and partially gassed out.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: The Keto Kid on November 04, 2017, 10:33:26 PM
Uncle Dana..
Has a new cash cow...
GSP...
 ;D  ;D
He needs one..
With Conor asking for a lot..
He needs to have an alternative cash cow..
Conor won't be fighting for a long time, he thinks he's the shit and won't fight unless his promotion company get a piece of everything. They need to start marketing Nate Diaz, that dudes a savage, doesn't give two fucks about anything!
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 04, 2017, 11:37:14 PM
Pretty good fight. GSP is a beast wrestler. The fear of the takedown totally changed Bisping fight plan in the cage. Er...uh...DA CAGE!
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 05, 2017, 01:06:38 AM
GSP was too heavy here.  You could see his energy drop off quick early on.  He wisely capitalized when Bisping went down and elbowed the shit out of him before getting the rear naked choke.  If not for that, it wasn't looking good.  Fair play though, he had 4 years off and went up in weight and won.  He kept composed even while busted open and partially gassed out.

That was definitely noticeable.  Yet these beastly heavyweights are 265-lb, and some of them have quite good stamina.  I guess GSP was just not intended to be a big man.  Compare him to Brock Lesnar who moves around like a featherweight, despite being, what, 80+ pounds heavier in contest?  It's really quite the remarkable feat.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 05, 2017, 01:29:19 AM
He recovered fine. Just nervous energy dump....he wasn't totally gassed.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 05, 2017, 01:56:53 AM
that pussy looks very lickable


Do you think it has the faint scent of fish?  :D  Love that faint scent.

He recovered fine. Just nervous energy dump....he wasn't totally gassed.

Agreed.  He was only gassed for some parts of the contest.  ;D
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: hp31 on November 05, 2017, 01:00:59 AM
but its hot as fuck her wider hips and narrow waist

and i bet she has a hot round firm bubble ass too boot

(https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/20687929_111118412888385_1292907287786029056_n.jpg)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Bindare_Dundat on November 05, 2017, 02:23:54 AM
Best YouTube comment

"I always used to force things, but best thing is to set up traps, so when they step in, its easier to get him." -GSP
Kevin Spacey
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Royalty on November 05, 2017, 02:53:32 AM
Commentators disappoint me.

Anybody watching that fight could see that GSP was running out of gas.  Yeah, he won, but the "amazing performance" shit.. come on, he was very close to being utterly gassed and out of the fight.  Bisping.. I've never liked to watch, but the dude was going to win the marathon, no doubt.

But instead, GSP gets in a good hit and that's it.

Now they build up GSP to be immortal and sell more PPVs based on exaggeration.

This is why a lot of people, including myself have tired of watching fighting.  Because the fact is, it's 90% based on exaggeration.  It's a game of very fine margins and to make out like these people are unbeatable is most often just bullshit.  It doesn't pay to tell the truth that Bisping could well have won in the later rounds.






Shut your worthless whore mouth
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 05, 2017, 03:33:36 AM
(https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/20687929_111118412888385_1292907287786029056_n.jpg)

umm, i take that back

usually my spider-sense of ass hotness is pretty spot on, but not thos time  :-X

thought shed look something more this this
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: oldtimer1 on November 05, 2017, 05:52:12 AM
I was wrong. Way wrong. GSP looked amazing.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: gmflex on November 05, 2017, 06:57:15 AM
Conor won't be fighting for a long time, he thinks he's the shit and won't fight unless his promotion company get a piece of everything. They need to start marketing Nate Diaz, that dudes a savage, doesn't give two fucks about anything!

I totally agree...
Nate and Nick put on great fights..
Too bad Dana doesn't doesn't negotiate better deals with them specifically Nate..
Dana is dropping the ball not promoting Nate..
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: che on November 05, 2017, 07:00:46 AM


Also, I would like to put my dick inside Rose.




Nothing there , it would be like fucking DJ181



Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 05, 2017, 07:03:47 AM

Nothing there , it would be like fucking DJ181





lol

cept her legs are bigger than mine

but hopefully her clit aint bigger than my c0ck
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: doggler on November 05, 2017, 07:27:54 AM
The Ccunt Bisping lost .   After ducking other fighters he thought he had easy win in the bag.
Rose is a sexy bitch . This is a funny vid.


Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: honest on November 05, 2017, 01:56:25 PM
GSP looks slow and old compared to his former self, I think retiring again could be on the cards, although Whitaker looks to be an option, dropping to welter I don't see this version of him being competitive with Woodley, who bores me to death, but like Rashad  previously, wrestlers with a good punch are very effective especially when they don't take any risks. He will be tough to beat with his conservative boring style.

I think whitaker beats GSP as well but if he fights again that looks to be the easier fight, in saying that he just got beat up and gased out against Bisping, if he hadn't landed that punch, I think GSP could easily have lost, as Bispings clearly  superior cardio took over.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 05, 2017, 02:21:30 PM
bearing in mind how much training these guys do how can they display bodies with such poor tone.

I would be shredded if I was fight training for hours on end a day....
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: visualizeperfection on November 05, 2017, 04:59:52 PM
bearing in mind how much training these guys do how can they display bodies with such poor tone.

I would be shredded if I was fight training for hours on end a day....

Not taking the bait.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: spiro on November 05, 2017, 05:22:54 PM
bearing in mind how much training these guys do how can they display bodies with such poor tone.

I would be shredded if I was fight training for hours on end a day....

Most of them are shredded. GSP is s specimen. They are also being tested many times a year.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 05, 2017, 05:28:14 PM

Nothing there , it would be like fucking DJ181





Naw, she's hot.  I want to skeet some babies up inside her.

(http://www.mmafightcorner.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RoseNamajunas.png)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: cephissus on November 05, 2017, 09:58:10 PM
makes you wonder how close KK really came to closing JJ out. speaking of, lol @ cormier losing his shit when rose won. i have a feeling he was imagining a different JJ crumpled up on the mat.

i like rose a lot, and the real delight will be seeing dana and friends squirm every time she gets in front of the camera ;D
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: WalterWhite on November 05, 2017, 10:11:44 PM
Naw, she's hot.  I want to skeet some babies up inside her.

(http://www.mmafightcorner.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RoseNamajunas.png)

And she got that big mouth,trash talking roidbitch to tap from strikes! ;D

Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: dj181 on November 05, 2017, 10:16:00 PM
And she got that big mouth,trash talking roidbitch to tap from strikes! ;D



we need to tag team her

pound the living shit outta her with massive cocks

and ma main man che can join in the frey if he so desires
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 05, 2017, 10:52:10 PM
And she got that big mouth,trash talking roidbitch to tap from strikes! ;D



That deserves its own thread.  Once again, the UFC tried to pretend the women's division was on par in terms of quality and excitement as the men's division, yet their new supposedly untouchable female champion tapped out to strikes in the very first round.  It really makes me think that the talent pool in the women's division is very thin due to far fewer women expressing an interest in it than due males [naturally - none should be surprised about this trend].

So what you have is a situation where some of the women are legitimately at the pro level, and others who are not near that level, then you end up getting streaks that end abruptly as soon as the "untouchable" champion women [Rhonda Rousey, Joanna Jędrzejczyk, or whoever else] bumps into another woman in the Octagon who is at her level.

For those reasons, I have a very hard time believing the women's division comprises sufficiently to be in the UFC.  Also, here is the better looking Polish combat sportswoman as far as I am concerned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karolina_Kowalkiewicz
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: WalterWhite on November 05, 2017, 11:35:18 PM
That deserves its own thread.  Once again, the UFC tried to pretend the women's division was on par in terms of quality and excitement as the men's division, yet their new supposedly untouchable female champion tapped out to strikes in the very first round.  It really makes me think that the talent pool in the women's division is very thin due to far fewer women expressing an interest in it than due males [naturally - none should be surprised about this trend].

So what you have is a situation where some of the women are legitimately at the pro level, and others who are not near that level, then you end up getting streaks that end abruptly as soon as the "untouchable" champion women [Rhonda Rousey, Joanna Jędrzejczyk, or whoever else] bumps into another woman in the Octagon who is at her level.

For those reasons, I have a very hard time believing the women's division comprises sufficiently to be in the UFC.  Also, here is the better looking Polish combat sportswoman as far as I am concerned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karolina_Kowalkiewicz

Not sure if you are watching The Ultimate Fighter tv series but the talent pool there is pretty weak. They are using it to establish a new women's 125lb flyweight division. W/L records not spectacular and a number of has-beens.

At this point even the mens division is not looking great and its no wonder they sold it. WME-IMG has been cutting payroll from $55 million pay to $27m. Also significant talent has moved to Bellator.  This was the first decent card in some time. USADA is not helping matters.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: smoothasf on November 06, 2017, 12:12:08 AM
Some of you guys are not on this planet.  Gsp was quicker and more accurate in the standup, bisping is one of the best strikers in the UFC.  Gsp was stronger and able to take him down at will.  Bisping has a great active guard but your still loosing from that position.  He checked him standing, wrestling and finally submission.  My money was on bisping, not because of age and all that crap but because he is actively fighting and the top level constantly with no time off.  GSP came in with zero ring rust and looked as good as ever.  Looking gassed means nothing, you can't tell how much someone has left by how they look. 
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 06, 2017, 01:05:17 AM
Not sure if you are watching The Ultimate Fighter tv series but the talent pool there is pretty weak. They are using it to establish a new women's 125lb flyweight division. W/L records not spectacular and a number of has-beens.

At this point even the mens division is not looking great and its no wonder they sold it. WME-IMG has been cutting payroll from $55 million pay to $27m. Also significant talent has moved to Bellator.  This was the first decent card in some time. USADA is not helping matters.

Interesting - but not surprising at all, regarding the women's division.  I don't get the sense that the UFC is trying to bring women on board as some diversity push or anything, but has gender divisions for the same reason the Olympic games do - namely because women wouldn't stand a chance if they had to compete in the men's division.  ;D  And I suppose commercially there is enough interest in the women's division, so hey.

Is it just me, or has the UFC been a little less entertaining in 2017 compared to 2016?  Does Conor McGregor have something to do with that?  Because it seems to me the fight quality is not the same, but maybe I just haven't bought a pay-per-view in a while to really get a sense of where the quality has been this year.  I did buy more pay-per-views in 2016, so maybe that's why I liked it more - I just saw more, so by implication, saw more good fights.

As you said, USADA has changed everything - I suppose a lot of the fighters were on steroids.  My friend even says that is why GSP left, because he was worried USADA would come around and destroy his legacy as they destroyed Lance Armstrong's legacy.  Could you imagine having to live with that?  On the other hand, if GSP did use steroids, he needs to live with that - knowing some people would consider him a fake.  Not me though - as steroids are in every sport.  But with USADA, they have been in the UFC a heck of a lot less it seems.

Speaking of which, did you catch Johny's Hendricks' fight?  Do you think that will be his last?  I don't want to see him go out the way Josh Koscheck did, on six losses in a row.  That must be a terrible thing for a fighter to have to face - especially one as previously dominant as Hendricks was.  I think many of us remember his fight against GSP in UFC 167.

Some of you guys are not on this planet.  Gsp was quicker and more accurate in the standup, bisping is one of the best strikers in the UFC.  Gsp was stronger and able to take him down at will.  Bisping has a great active guard but your still loosing from that position.  He checked him standing, wrestling and finally submission.  My money was on bisping, not because of age and all that crap but because he is actively fighting and the top level constantly with no time off.  GSP came in with zero ring rust and looked as good as ever.  Looking gassed means nothing, you can't tell how much someone has left by how they look.  


Also consider that the last fight that did not go the distance with GSP prior to the doctor stoppage in GSP vs. BJ Penn II would have been his fight against Matt Serra when he finished him in the second round from knees to the body.  That was April 19th, 2008.  In other words, Bisping lasted far less time with GSP than did most welterweights.  So either Bisping is washed up [which I seem to doubt] or GSP has come in much, much better.  I would tend to believe it was this latter quality.

He reminds me of Canada's current 7x strongest man Jean Francois Caron - I believe he cracked the top five at World's again this year.  He just keeps improving and keeps improving.  What's with these French Canadians?  ;D
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: cephissus on November 06, 2017, 01:26:14 AM
do people put up with your senseless yapping in real life, matt?

???
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Matt on November 06, 2017, 01:47:40 AM
do people put up with your senseless yapping in real life, matt?

???

To be honest, I'm remarkably quiet in person.  I don't have very much to say unless people bring up the subject, and I find that in person, people tend not to be as vocal as they are online.  Since my commentary tends to be responsive or reactive, it's hard for me to speak a lot when I have nothing to respond to.  People don't bring up the depth and breadth of topics as they tend to in message boards or in writing, so I am quiet as a result.  When I do speak a lot, it tends to be rich in facts and specific details, so yes, people listen to me.  They do not consider me to be senseless.  Quite the opposite, when people's marriages and lives fall apart, they tend to speak to me.  I hate that I haven't been able to give all of them as much time and attention as I do to some posts here on Getbig.  :-\

That answers your question for your purposes - the following is what I would add only for people who are interested in what I have to say, with this being my judgment on my own posts, and their length:

As to my post above, it is long, but it is on-topic, specific commentary.  For example, the point about Bisping lasting less time with Georges St-Pierre than literally almost a decade's worth of welterweights...does that indicate that either Bisping is less than his best, or perhaps more likely, as GSP has said repeatedly [and I trust him as a pretty objective judge of himself] that GSP himself is at his lifetime best?

Yes, I'm long-winded, but I have a lot of relevant facts in my posts.  I follow both the UFC and bodybuilding with great interest, and I believe my comments come from the position, at the very least, of an educated fan.  What exactly is senseless about objectively reporting on GSP's fight history and speculating on the reason for the outcome in his most recent fight?  I have quite enjoyed the posts of others regarding their speculation regarding GSP, as I too got the sense his gas tank was dwindling into the third round, before his massive flurry.  It's like he caught a second wind.

Back to cephissus' post about me - I am not forcing anyone to read what I have to say.  Anyone is free to just skip over it and not read it.  I'm not going to stop posting as long as I know that I am making quality posts, devoid of profanity, personal attacks, and spelling errors - or at least, mostly devoid of those things.

I have had waaaayyy too many people, including professional bodybuilders and others in the industry, tell me that they have read my posts with great interest for me to stop posting as I do.  But my posts are not for everyone - they are obviously very long!!  But on that note, once again, I am not forcing anyone to read my posts.

Basically I have a compulsive desire to speak in full points.  I always feel the need to make what I say absolutely clear - the irony is, I would get more readers if I made smaller posts.  I think.  Things need to be made digestible to the masses, and I basically never do that.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: macaumuscle on November 06, 2017, 01:48:40 AM
To be honest, I'm remarkably quiet in person.  I don't have very much to say unless people bring up the subject, and I find that in person, people tend not to be as vocal as they are online.  Since my commentary tends to be responsive or reactive, it's hard for me to speak a lot when I have nothing to respond to.  People don't bring up the depth and breadth of topics as they tend to in message boards or in writing, so I am quiet as a result.  When I do speak a lot, it tends to be rich in facts and specific details, so yes, people listen to me.  They do not consider me to be senseless.  Quite the opposite, when people's marriages and lives fall apart, they tend to speak to me.  I hate that I haven't been able to give all of them as much time and attention as I do to some posts here on Getbig.  :-\

That answers your question for your purposes - the following is what I would add only for people who are interested in what I have to say, with this being my judgment on my own posts, and their length:

As to my post above, it is long, but it is on-topic, specific commentary.  For example, the point about Bisping lasting less time with Georges St-Pierre than literally almost a decade's worth of welterweights...does that indicate that either Bisping is less than his best, or perhaps more likely, as GSP has said repeatedly [and I trust him as a pretty objective judge of himself] that GSP himself is at his lifetime best?

Yes, I'm long-winded, but I have a lot of relevant facts in my posts.  I follow both the UFC and bodybuilding with great interest, and I believe my comments come from the position, at the very least, of an educated fan.  What exactly is senseless about objectively reporting on GSP's fight history and speculating on the reason for the outcome in his most recent fight?  I have quite enjoyed the posts of others regarding their speculation regarding GSP, as I too got the sense his gas tank was dwindling into the third round, before his massive flurry.  It's like he caught a second wind.

Back to cephissus' post about me - I am not forcing anyone to read what I have to say.  Anyone is free to just skip over it and not read it.  I'm not going to stop posting as long as I know that I am making quality posts, devoid of profanity, personal attacks, and spelling errors - or at least, mostly devoid of those things.

I have had waaaayyy too many people, including professional bodybuilders and others in the industry, tell me that they have read my posts with great interest for me to stop posting as I do.  But my posts are not for everyone - they are obviously very long!!  But on that note, once again, I am not forcing anyone to read my posts.

Basically I have a compulsive desire to speak in full points.  I always feel the need to make what I say absolutely clear - the irony is, I would get more readers if I made smaller posts.  I think.  Things need to be made digestible to the masses, and I basically never do that.

when are you sending me my paypal money?
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 06, 2017, 04:36:50 AM
Most of them are shredded. GSP is s specimen. They are also being tested many times a year.
hahahaha... yeah right...
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: titusisback on November 06, 2017, 06:48:39 AM
hahahaha... yeah right...

12 times by USADA so far, feel free to look it up

https://www.usada.org/testing/results/athlete-test-history/
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: _bruce_ on November 06, 2017, 07:57:12 AM
Looks hot but dead inside.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 06, 2017, 08:49:23 AM
To be honest, I'm remarkably quiet in person.  I don't have very much to say unless people bring up the subject, and I find that in person, people tend not to be as vocal as they are online.  Since my commentary tends to be responsive or reactive, it's hard for me to speak a lot when I have nothing to respond to.  People don't bring up the depth and breadth of topics as they tend to in message boards or in writing, so I am quiet as a result.  When I do speak a lot, it tends to be rich in facts and specific details, so yes, people listen to me.  They do not consider me to be senseless.  Quite the opposite, when people's marriages and lives fall apart, they tend to speak to me.  I hate that I haven't been able to give all of them as much time and attention as I do to some posts here on Getbig.  :-\

That answers your question for your purposes - the following is what I would add only for people who are interested in what I have to say, with this being my judgment on my own posts, and their length:

As to my post above, it is long, but it is on-topic, specific commentary.  For example, the point about Bisping lasting less time with Georges St-Pierre than literally almost a decade's worth of welterweights...does that indicate that either Bisping is less than his best, or perhaps more likely, as GSP has said repeatedly [and I trust him as a pretty objective judge of himself] that GSP himself is at his lifetime best?

Yes, I'm long-winded, but I have a lot of relevant facts in my posts.  I follow both the UFC and bodybuilding with great interest, and I believe my comments come from the position, at the very least, of an educated fan.  What exactly is senseless about objectively reporting on GSP's fight history and speculating on the reason for the outcome in his most recent fight?  I have quite enjoyed the posts of others regarding their speculation regarding GSP, as I too got the sense his gas tank was dwindling into the third round, before his massive flurry.  It's like he caught a second wind.

Back to cephissus' post about me - I am not forcing anyone to read what I have to say.  Anyone is free to just skip over it and not read it.  I'm not going to stop posting as long as I know that I am making quality posts, devoid of profanity, personal attacks, and spelling errors - or at least, mostly devoid of those things.

I have had waaaayyy too many people, including professional bodybuilders and others in the industry, tell me that they have read my posts with great interest for me to stop posting as I do.  But my posts are not for everyone - they are obviously very long!!  But on that note, once again, I am not forcing anyone to read my posts.

Basically I have a compulsive desire to speak in full points.  I always feel the need to make what I say absolutely clear - the irony is, I would get more readers if I made smaller posts.  I think.  Things need to be made digestible to the masses, and I basically never do that.

Could you say that Getbig is an outlet for you?

A place where you can open your mind and heart, unlike Lakehead U?
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Conker on November 06, 2017, 09:40:45 AM
torrented it yesterday. really great fight! bisping was a bit outclassed tbf. but those elbows off the bottom were like razor blades.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 06, 2017, 09:42:04 AM
Derek Run-Son running from Costa

Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 06, 2017, 10:06:49 AM
12 times by USADA so far, feel free to look it up

https://www.usada.org/testing/results/athlete-test-history/
do you think they dont know prior to the tests,
Why would Dana want his athletes flailing around looking like shit?
In fact why test at all?
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: visualizeperfection on November 06, 2017, 11:47:22 AM
torrented it yesterday. really great fight! bisping was a bit outclassed tbf. but those elbows off the bottom were like razor blades.

If you got a real job you could just purchase the PPV live.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Royalty on November 06, 2017, 11:57:59 AM
do you think they dont know prior to the tests,
Why would Dana want his athletes flailing around looking like shit?
In fact why test at all?

I think that the Athletic Commisions needed to have the UFC get USADA involved because it was already a controversial sport. And you can't have guys with dangerous skills all roided up. They wear those tiny gloves. Eventually somebody was going to get hurt badly.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Simple Simon on November 06, 2017, 12:09:14 PM
I think that the Athletic Commisions needed to have the UFC get USADA involved because it was already a controversial sport. And you can't have guys with dangerous skills all roided up. They wear those tiny gloves. Eventually somebody was going to get hurt badly.

if they were that bothered about people getting hurt they would start banning fighters from hitting an unconscious opponent, these refs diving in like fucking idiots is ridiculous.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: spiro on November 06, 2017, 01:00:09 PM
do you think they dont know prior to the tests,
Why would Dana want his athletes flailing around looking like shit?
In fact why test at all?

They have lost a couple major names because of the testing. Bones Jones failed a test. He's done forever the greatest p4p  because of failed tests.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Kwon on November 06, 2017, 01:44:02 PM
Already back when Thug Rose fought Paige, Dana looked like he hanged himself.

(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pj1RhMqz35s/maxresdefault.jpg)

(https://usatmmajunkie.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/paige-vanzant-rose-namajunas-composite.jpg?w=640)
(https://img.maximummedia.ie/sportsjoe_ie/eyJkYXRhIjoie1widXJsXCI6XCJodHRwOlxcXC9cXFwvbWVkaWEtc3BvcnRzam9lLm1heGltdW1tZWRpYS5pZS5zMy5hbWF6b25hd3MuY29tXFxcL3dwLWNvbnRlbnRcXFwvdXBsb2Fkc1xcXC8yMDE1XFxcLzExXFxcLzI5MTMyNjQ2XFxcL1Jvc2UtbmFtYWp1bmFzLmpwZ1wiLFwid2lkdGhcIjo2NDcsXCJoZWlnaHRcIjozNDAsXCJkZWZhdWx0XCI6XCJodHRwczpcXFwvXFxcL3d3dy5zcG9ydHNqb2UuaWVcXFwvYXNzZXRzXFxcL2ltYWdlc1xcXC9zcG9ydHNqb2VcXFwvbm8taW1hZ2UucG5nP3Y9NFwifSIsImhhc2giOiIyMGI5Mzc0M2I3MTQ1MzdjMzQwNGRmOTVlZmEyNDU2MWZiODQyZjVjIn0=/rose-namajunas.jpg)
(http://blacksportsonline.com/home/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/image24.jpg)
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: honest on November 06, 2017, 02:13:07 PM
Some of you guys are not on this planet.  Gsp was quicker and more accurate in the standup, bisping is one of the best strikers in the UFC.  Gsp was stronger and able to take him down at will.  Bisping has a great active guard but your still loosing from that position.  He checked him standing, wrestling and finally submission.  My money was on bisping, not because of age and all that crap but because he is actively fighting and the top level constantly with no time off.  GSP came in with zero ring rust and looked as good as ever.  Looking gassed means nothing, you can't tell how much someone has left by how they look. 


I suggest you go back and watch his earlier fights, he was slow predictable in comparison and Michael bisping is nothing but a journeyman with a belt. Yeah bisping is tough and durable but most successful journeymen are.
The old GSP could level change, shoot, strike without any signal, its what made him so hard to fight. He looked composed and measured distance very well Saturday but he telegraphed everything, no way hes taking down Romero, Jacaare, Weidman, Whittaker maybe but he's getting straight back up where he does. His first fight back after 4 years out but he needs to improve to beat anyone other than Bisping who was definitely the easiest fight for him.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: Conker on November 06, 2017, 02:52:55 PM
If you got a real job you could just purchase the PPV live.
[/quote

i have 4 paid iptv subscriptions that i could have watched the fight live on if i wanted. but weren't that bothered to stay up till 4 or 5am (uk time) to watch it.
Title: Re: UFC 217: Bisping vs. St-Pierre
Post by: visualizeperfection on November 06, 2017, 03:17:02 PM
If you got a real job you could just purchase the PPV live.

i have 4 paid iptv subscriptions that i could have watched the fight live on if i wanted. but weren't that bothered to stay up till 4 or 5am (uk time) to watch it.


You can't even correctly quote a post on GetBig.com.

No chance of supporting 4 paid iptv subscriptions.