Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Nether Animal on December 28, 2017, 04:53:56 PM

Title: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Nether Animal on December 28, 2017, 04:53:56 PM
Smaller but hell, check out that condition. I like Heath's earlier look up through around '09 (even though he came off in that Olympia).
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: a_pupil on December 28, 2017, 05:12:09 PM
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EdjDBROdLmg/hqdefault.jpg)

he should not be winning any major pro shows in his current condition though.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Fortress on December 28, 2017, 05:13:13 PM
Much better, yes. But look at how narrow the fucker is!
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Redux on December 28, 2017, 06:24:27 PM
so damn narrow
and those terrible terrible pecs
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Danimal77 on December 28, 2017, 06:45:05 PM
Smaller but hell, check out that condition. I like Heath's earlier look up through around '09 (even though he came off in that Olympia).

Much more impressive back then than he has been in recent years. He sacrificed good size, symmetry, proportions and condition for the bloated and soft mess that he is now.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: BSN on December 28, 2017, 11:43:24 PM
 8)
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Bevo on December 29, 2017, 02:14:07 AM
All those drugs over the years changed his face dramatically

Excessive gh and insulin
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2017, 03:34:28 AM
Its insulin. Same thing happened to nasser between 94 and 95 when milos started working with him. Bigger but absolutely not better.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2017, 06:06:07 AM
Okay here's the Nasser comparison. '94 to '95, added slin, got the same look at Heath there. The vascularity, thicker waist... bigger yes, but ehh.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693445;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693538;image)

After:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693541;image)
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Rascal full on December 29, 2017, 06:15:24 AM
Wow is that Nasser really only a year later? Any more photos you can throw up the facial change looks amazingly dramatic?!...
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Nether Animal on December 29, 2017, 06:17:26 AM
Wow is that Nasser really only a year later? Any more photos you can throw up the facial change looks amazingly dramatic?!...

I know right? Here's another: '94 NOC to '95 NOC (which he won)

(http://www.muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=37050&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cNmc1HARw7g/UoVPARn98aI/AAAAAAAAGGc/A7Eoo-GGVQY/s1600/1995+NOC.jpg)
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Fortress on December 29, 2017, 06:30:22 AM
Heath’s pecs are truly shitty.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Rascal full on December 29, 2017, 01:49:01 PM
I know right? Here's another: '94 NOC to '95 NOC (which he won)

(http://www.muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=37050&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cNmc1HARw7g/UoVPARn98aI/AAAAAAAAGGc/A7Eoo-GGVQY/s1600/1995+NOC.jpg)

That facial ageing is incredible, enough to put you off insulin completely. FUCK!
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Ted SuperSet on December 29, 2017, 01:55:44 PM
Okay here's the Nasser comparison. '94 to '95, added slin, got the same look at Heath there. The vascularity, thicker waist... bigger yes, but ehh.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693445;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693538;image)

After:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=621104.0;attach=693541;image)

Only 1 year between?
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Ted SuperSet on December 29, 2017, 01:57:15 PM
I know right? Here's another: '94 NOC to '95 NOC (which he won)

(http://www.muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=37050&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cNmc1HARw7g/UoVPARn98aI/AAAAAAAAGGc/A7Eoo-GGVQY/s1600/1995+NOC.jpg)

Aged 15 years in 1 year FFS!
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Rascal full on December 29, 2017, 01:59:56 PM
Aged 15 years in 1 year FFS!

Question is can it be revised if you stop taking insulin? Anyone seen Justin Compton lately, he is a good example.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Bevo on December 29, 2017, 02:47:55 PM
Its insulin. Same thing happened to nasser between 94 and 95 when milos started working with him. Bigger but absolutely not better.


Not just that, common sense excessive gh and peptides, etc
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Earl1972 on December 30, 2017, 01:54:02 PM
i actually think phil is one of the few pros that got better with age, he greatly improved all of his flaws and as far as the judging criteria goes he has no weakness

i didn't understand the hype around him back in 2006

E
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Wiggs on December 30, 2017, 01:56:42 PM
i actually think phil is one of the few pros that got better with age, he greatly improved all of his flaws and as far as the judging criteria goes he has no weakness

i didn't understand the hype around him back in 2006

E

His weakness is his gut and at this point, it's not fixable.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: DroppingPlates on December 30, 2017, 02:02:22 PM
He always had a beatable face
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Earl1972 on December 30, 2017, 02:09:05 PM
His weakness is his gut and at this point, it's not fixable.

a gut hasn't mattered in bodybuilding since the early 90's

E
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Parker on December 30, 2017, 02:48:48 PM
i actually think phil is one of the few pros that got better with age, he greatly improved all of his flaws and as far as the judging criteria goes he has no weakness

i didn't understand the hype around him back in 2006

E
The hype around him was several things. The detail that he had, conditioning, his arms, especially triceps, and that he is like a cross between Flex and Kevin.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Wiggs on December 30, 2017, 05:15:12 PM
a gut hasn't mattered in bodybuilding since the early 90's

E

It should.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: tres_taco_combo on December 30, 2017, 05:22:48 PM
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EdjDBROdLmg/hqdefault.jpg)

he should not be winning any major pro shows in his current condition though. mr olympia shouldn't be causing penis envy due to his belly button.

lol!

love that scene from pumping iron
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: 20inch calves on December 30, 2017, 05:34:39 PM
He looked better and ALOT healthier back on 2006
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Bevo on December 30, 2017, 05:41:05 PM
i actually think phil is one of the few pros that got better with age, he greatly improved all of his flaws and as far as the judging criteria goes he has no weakness

i didn't understand the hype around him back in 2006

E

Aside from being narrow he really doesn’t have flaws in terms of bbing criteria

He has back, arms, chest, quads, and even calves
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Earl1972 on December 30, 2017, 08:13:51 PM
It should.

no kidding, but we know it hasn't

E
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Earl1972 on December 30, 2017, 08:15:50 PM
Aside from being narrow he really doesn’t have flaws in terms of bbing criteria

He has back, arms, chest, quads, and even calves

i'm not a fan of his body from the front at all, but based on the criteria he is pretty much unbeatable today and probably would only lose to ronnie within the past 20 years

E
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Al Doggity on December 30, 2017, 11:00:52 PM
His weakness is his gut and at this point, it's not fixable.

Other than Dexter Jackson, whose the last Mr. O that had a better midsection than phil?
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Wiggs on December 30, 2017, 11:05:37 PM
Other than Dexter Jackson, whose the last Mr. O that had a better midsection than phil?

Jay, at least he didn't have a gut.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Al Doggity on December 30, 2017, 11:52:12 PM
Jay, at least he didn't have a gut.

He didn't need a gut because his waist spread outward. His waist was wider than his chest. At least Phil can control his gut in most poses.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Bevo on December 31, 2017, 05:00:39 AM
Other than Dexter Jackson, whose the last Mr. O that had a better midsection than phil?

Dexter had/has a gut, it’s not as bad as most though
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Wiggs on December 31, 2017, 05:30:46 AM
He didn't need a gut because his waist spread outward. His waist was wider than his chest. At least Phil can control his gut in most poses.

Jays waist was wide  but Jay was also one of the widest guys..Phil has narrow clavicles but his waist is no longer narrow AND, he can't control his gut. Watch the game 2017 Mr. O and see the fallout after on social media. His core is now atrocious.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Al Doggity on December 31, 2017, 10:01:29 AM
Dexter had/has a gut, it’s not as bad as most though


I know, but he has the only midsection that I would consider better than Phil's.
Title: Re: Phil HEATH back in '06
Post by: Al Doggity on December 31, 2017, 10:11:26 AM
Jays waist was wide  but Jay was also one of the widest guys..Phil has narrow clavicles but his waist is no longer narrow AND, he can't control his gut. Watch the game 2017 Mr. O and see the fallout after on social media. His core is now atrocious.


Every recent Mr. O's appearance deteriorated a lot over the course of their run. Jay's appearance probably deteriorated the least from any other recent Mr. O's just because he looked so bad from the beginning.  A wide waist that results in almost no taper is a huge flaw in my book. In some shots, it looks like he has a beer gut going over the sides of his trunks. Even with his deteriorated mid-section, Phil still has a dramatically better taper than Jay did.