Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Kwon on February 03, 2018, 01:05:53 PM
-
Man breaks down crying being blocked from using bathroom (https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/videos/962743590530203/)
-
Guy will now end up a millionaire.
-
Should be taken in behind the establishment by some men and beaten to death.
Then it’s back inside to the appetizer.
-
Guy will now end up a millionaire.
How ? its private property and they not allow blokes in the women WC
-
How ? its private property and they not allow blokes in the women WC
Fuck me, what planet are you on, dont you read the news, they misgendered him, at the moment it isnt a crime but its getting there, he can take a civil suit against them for distress and harm...
https://nypost.com/2016/05/19/city-issues-new-guidelines-on-transgender-pronouns/
-
Fuck me, what planet are you on, dont you read the news, they misgendered him, at the moment it isnt a crime but its getting there, he can take a civil suit against them for distress and harm...
https://nypost.com/2016/05/19/city-issues-new-guidelines-on-transgender-pronouns/
Not in LA dimwit
-
Not in LA dimwit
Unruh Civil Rights Act, a California law that outlaws a broad range of discrimination, including by sex or sexual orientation
In 1992, the Unruh Act was amended to provide that “[a] violation of the right of any individual under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990… shall also constitute a violation of this section.” (Cal. Civ. Code § 51(f); Munson v. Del Taco, Inc. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 661, 668-669).) The Ninth Circuit has since held that violating the ADA is a per se violation of the Unruh Act. (Lentini v. Cal. Ctr. for the Arts, 370 F.3d 837, 847 (9th Cir. Cal. 2004); Munson v. Del Taco, Inc. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 661, 672).
Under the Unruh Act, a Plaintiff is entitled to recover actual damages and an amount up to three times the actual damages for each violation of the Unruh Act, “but in no case less than $4,000…” for each and every offense (Cal. Civ. Code § 52(a); Munson v. Del Taco, Inc. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 661, 667.) In order to maintain an action for these statutory minimum damages, “an individual must… [establish] that he or she was denied full and equal access on a particular occasion.” (Donald v. Cafe Royale Inc. (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 168, 183.)
A Plaintiff is entitled to $4,000 for each time he visits an establishment that contains architectural barriers that deny the Plaintiff of full and equal enjoyment of the premises (Feezor v. Del Taco, Inc. (2005) 431 F.Supp.2d 1088, 1091.) “Such an interpretation is supported by case law and is consistent with the plain language of UCRA [Unruh Act].” Id. The Plaintiff need not establish that he was wholly excluded from enjoying the Defendant’s services, only that he was denied full and equal access (Hubbard v. Twin Oaks Health and Rehabilitation Center. (2004) 408 F.Supp.2d 923, 932.)