Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Twaddle on July 20, 2018, 08:25:30 PM

Title: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 20, 2018, 08:25:30 PM
Shit's about to get real in FL.   :o

"An argument over a handicapped parking spot at a convenience store in Florida led to a fatal shooting and the man who pulled the trigger won’t be arrested under the state’s “stand your ground” self-defense law, authorities said.

Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri told reporters during a Friday press conference that Thursday’s shooting death of Markeis McGlockton, a 28-year-old father of three, is “within the bookends of stand your ground and within the bookends of force being justified,” the Tampa Bay Times reports."

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 20, 2018, 09:50:32 PM
What's the issue?  Shooter was violently shoved to the ground over an argument and defended himself.

"The agency will forward the case to the State Attorney’s Office for a final decision, Gualtieri said."


Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 20, 2018, 09:56:09 PM
I'm sure the mainstream media analysis of this situation will make no mention of Trayvon Jr blindsiding the guy and forcefully knocking him onto the cement ground.

Be careful who you fuck with chocolate face.  Some people look like easy victims...............bu t they ain't.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 20, 2018, 10:05:51 PM
I'm sure the mainstream media analysis of this situation will make no mention of Trayvon Jr blindsiding the guy and forcefully knocking him onto the cement ground.

Be careful who you fuck with chocolate face.  Some people look like easy victims...............bu t they ain't.


This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: werewolf operative on July 20, 2018, 10:09:58 PM
Shit's about to get real in FL.   :o

Oh word? What they gonna do? Loot a shoe sto` and burn down a wallgreens? Who fucking cares...Fuck nig*ers.

 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 20, 2018, 10:20:28 PM
Oh word? What they gonna do? Loot a shoe sto` and burn down a wallgreens? Who fucking cares...Fuck nig*ers.

 

No next the family will paraded out with some high profile attorney and they will sue.


This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

And he should watch his back why?  Lot's of red necks in FL to stand their ground with him. :D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Disgusted on July 20, 2018, 10:23:11 PM

This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

I agree, I also noticed that the man backed up so not so sure if he was justified. One thing I will say is that once the man was pushed down on the pavement he may have been so startled he may not have noticed that the man was backing up. He also may have hit his head and shot out of pure fear for his life. Either way the other guy paid a huge price for trying to be a tough guy.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: HonestBob on July 20, 2018, 10:28:38 PM
Set of absolute dickheads defending the shooter.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 20, 2018, 10:29:45 PM

This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

You don't push an applebee without consequences shoeshine.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 20, 2018, 10:48:07 PM
Set of absolute dickheads defending the shooter.

if a chocolateface pushes or threatens you in any way, shoot it.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 20, 2018, 10:50:22 PM

This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

I understand but I think it's time that white people start standing up for themselves and stop letting blacks knock them around and intimidate them out of some misplaced white guilt.

It's a sad situation but decisions have consequences and it's time for some folks to learn that.....the hard way.  Deadly force needs to be met with deadly force. 

I wouldn't tolerate it if white people were constantly teeing off on blacks for no reason.  It's time for everyone to be accountable for their actions.  Learn how to handle conflict and control your impulses.  Or get smoked.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Ropo on July 20, 2018, 11:26:01 PM

This definitely isn't Trayvon Martin 2.0.   Guy was violently pushed to the ground pretty clearly but backed off once the gun was displayed....yet he still shot him.


All within is rights and was a justified shoot but as the Sheriff pointed out....Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.   Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

How exactly you know that, were you there when Trayvon was shot?

What comes to this situation, punk get what he deserve, end of story. Don't push people to the ground, means "don't give them any reason to use their right to defend themselves". Simple enough for you? No one have right to do what he did, but what he did gives a man a legal reason to defend himself by force. It wasn't bullet which killed him, it was stupidity. And bo ho hoo, weep weep, he had three children...so what? This could be the best way he could use to give his children's an example what they should not do in their life  ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: visualizeperfection on July 20, 2018, 11:32:18 PM
Set of absolute dickheads defending the shooter.

IIRC you’re from the UK.


You’re brainwashed. Every time you put hands on someone you’re gambling. He should have kept his ha da to himself and he would still be here. Sucks to be him.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: D.O.A. on July 20, 2018, 11:34:04 PM
That seems a little harsh! Wasn't like he was trying to kill him. He just protected his kids and gf. To kill someone over this is a bit crazy.
On the other hand I wouldn't push someone the way he did! Still a life should be worth a little more then a stupid handicapped spot! I say he will go free anyway!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 20, 2018, 11:36:56 PM
If you contribute in any way of a violent altercation like this happening, it should be at least manslaughter. That old man isn't the guardian of handicap spots. If you see someone parking in those spots and you don't agree with it either call the cops or mind your own business.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 20, 2018, 11:46:54 PM
You don't push an old man (especially the Guardian of Handicap-spots) like that without consequences.


With the force of that push he could very well have landed on the back of his head and died.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 20, 2018, 11:52:38 PM
If you contribute in any way of a violent altercation like this happening, it should be at least manslaughter. That old man isn't the guardian of handicap spots. If you see someone parking in those spots and you don't agree with it either call the cops or mind your own business.

I respectfully disagree.  Blacks are the ones out there assaulting people with extreme and disproportionate violence.  They are the one's overreacting to common disputes (like this one).

Have a disagreement about the parking space, if the guy is in the wrong then tell him so.  Blindsiding him like that is using lethal force.  If he hits his head on the pavement he could die.  Happens all the time.

Stand your ground laws are in place for a reason.   Delontavious or DeAndre or DeMarcus or whatever his name is......was the aggressor.  You can't just clothesline somebody like that.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 20, 2018, 11:59:55 PM
I respectfully disagree.  Blacks are the ones out there assaulting people with extreme and disproportionate violence.  They are the one's overreacting to common disputes (like this one).

Have a disagreement about the parking space, if the guy is in the wrong then tell him so.  Blindsiding him like that is using lethal force.  If he hits his head on the pavement he could die.  Happens all the time.

Stand your ground laws are in place for a reason.   Delontavious or DeAndre or DeMarcus or whatever his name is......was the aggressor.  You can't just clothesline somebody like that.

Exactly. Obviously it was an older guy so just tell him to f off and get in the car and drive away with your family. No need to assault the guy! The manner in which he was blindsided shook him up and how is he supposed to know what the guy was going to do next.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 21, 2018, 12:06:35 AM
I respectfully disagree.  Blacks are the ones out there assaulting people with extreme and disproportionate violence.  They are the one's overreacting to common disputes (like this one).

Have a disagreement about the parking space, if the guy is in the wrong then tell him so.  Blindsiding him like that is using lethal force.  If he hits his head on the pavement he could die.  Happens all the time.

Stand your ground laws are in place for a reason.   Delontavious or DeAndre or DeMarcus or whatever his name is......was the aggressor.  You can't just clothesline somebody like that.

Did you read any of the comments on youtube? The guy was defending his girlfriend from the man. The old man should have minded his own business..I'm sure if you found someone yelling at your spouse and children, having a civilized conversation and respectfully disagreeing with him would be the last thing on your mind.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 12:17:22 AM
I'm just glad old folks are able to defend themselves in USA.

Here in Sweden if you are an older person and you get assaulted by a shitskin you are shit outta luck.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 21, 2018, 12:19:04 AM
compare it with this story.. ::)

https://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9623784/
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Disgusted on July 21, 2018, 12:45:38 AM
I'll bet money this guy gets charged with something. He was yelling and being confrontational towards the lady and her children. If he happens not to be charged he will lose a civil suite.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 01:46:56 AM
Did you read any of the comments on youtube? The guy was defending his girlfriend from the man. The old man should have minded his own business..I'm sure if you found someone yelling at your spouse and children, having a civilized conversation and respectfully disagreeing with him would be the last thing on your mind.

That wasn't defending your family, that's battery using deadly force.  The old man should have minded his business but meddling in other people's business does not give someone the right to what DeAngelo did to him.  If someone was yelling and my spouse and children I would yell back and tell him to fuck off.  DeMario here, made no effort to do that.  He snuck upon the guy, sucker punched him, and knocked him into next week.  He overreacted because of his inherent black hostility and hatred of whites.  Now he's dead.  Like I said, it's very sad but when you play stupid games you win stupid prizes.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 01:54:51 AM


Is his girlfriend or one of his kids handicap?  Is that the reason the dispute happen over the spot, or they just parked in a handicap spot?



I'm curious about that as well.  If they are wrongfully parking in a handicapped space then they could have avoided the entire situation by parking in the correct space.  Time will tell.

That's a trend with a lot of these black fatalities.  Many of them could have been avoided if they would just stop ignoring the law and acting belligerent and violent. 

Obey the law.  Obey the lawful orders of police officers.  Don't resist arrest.  Don't attack people.  Do that and you'll stay out of prison and in all likelihood you'll stay alive.  Not rocket science.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 01:59:29 AM
I'm curious about that as well.  If they are wrongfully parking in a handicapped space then they could have avoided the entire situation by parking in the correct space.  Time will tell.

That's a trend with a lot of these black fatalities.  Many of them could have been avoided if they would just stop ignoring the law and acting belligerent and violent. 

Obey the law.  Obey the lawful orders of police officers.  Don't resist arrest.  Don't attack people.  Do that and you'll stay out of prison and in all likelihood you'll stay alive.  Not rocket science.

And don't hit or push elders. They are much weaker than normal.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Desolate on July 21, 2018, 02:01:54 AM
I'm sensing that some negro do something stupid. ::)

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 02:09:11 AM
https://www.kiro7.com/news/trending-now/13yearold-girl-beheaded-after-seeing-grandmother-killed-in-alabama-cemetery/789237419 (https://www.kiro7.com/news/trending-now/13yearold-girl-beheaded-after-seeing-grandmother-killed-in-alabama-cemetery/789237419)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: seCrawler on July 21, 2018, 02:27:21 AM
I'm curious about that as well.  If they are wrongfully parking in a handicapped space then they could have avoided the entire situation by parking in the correct space.  Time will tell.

That's a trend with a lot of these black fatalities.  Many of them could have been avoided if they would just stop ignoring the law and acting belligerent and violent. 

Obey the law.  Obey the lawful orders of police officers.  Don't resist arrest.  Don't attack people.  Do that and you'll stay out of prison and in all likelihood you'll stay alive.  Not rocket science.

Semi-similar incident several yrs ago.



The most interesting thing is the comment section.  Personally, I believe both incidents fall under Keep your Hands to Yourself Law but it seems debatable with posters.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: muscleman-2017 on July 21, 2018, 02:31:33 AM
That old man isn't the guardian of handicap spots. If you see someone parking in those spots and you don't agree with it either call the cops or mind your own business.

Rubbish comment.

Cops aint gonna come out over a handicap park dispute.  

So who's gonna act on the issue?  Yeah someone just like this old dude, and fair enough.  There are legit people who need that spot.

Someone has to stand up for social decency and order. Not everyone is a pathetic chickenshit cowardly cuck who looks the other way and keeps walking.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: werewolf operative on July 21, 2018, 03:15:22 AM
Nothing good will come from this and he'll spend his life savings on attorneys along with forever watching his back.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/2c872cc4dc7a3058f7b60dca7ec7b37f/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG AL MCKECHNIE on July 21, 2018, 04:04:12 AM
And don't hit or push elders. They are much weaker than normal.

Is the shooter not a guy in his 40's?    A wee inadequate chap but hardly an elder.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 21, 2018, 05:37:45 AM
Was she given a citation for the illegal handicap parking?   ???
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: fredrollon on July 21, 2018, 05:49:28 AM

Not even arrested and questioned. Wow..
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 21, 2018, 05:55:46 AM
Not even arrested and questioned. Wow..

Why would they arrest him?  What law did he break?   ???
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: R.A.M. on July 21, 2018, 06:06:47 AM
not sure if this story will grow legs and take off... the media is hardcore after President Trump right now. Russia yadda yadda yadda... paying off old playboy playmate yadda yadda yadda.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: fredrollon on July 21, 2018, 06:20:28 AM
Why would they arrest him?  What law did he break?   ???

Guess I'm not familiar with the "stand your ground" law.

I'd assumed police,when dealing with a shooting death, would,as a matter of routine,question the shooter with his lawyer present . And this would be the case even if the shooting appeared to be self-defense.

My mistake.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 06:25:12 AM
This attack would not have stopped if the guy didn't have a gun.  Homie looked like he was pulling up his shorts to get some more.

The family member that the black dude was "protecting" got out of the car too.  In all likelihood that person was planning to get hostile with the old guy as well.

Blacks are quite fond of beating people by committee.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 21, 2018, 06:29:18 AM
This attack would not have stopped if the guy didn't have a gun.  Homie looked like he was pulling up his shorts to get some more.

The family member that the black dude was "protecting" got out of the car too.  In all likelihood that person was planning to get hostile with the old guy as well.

Blacks are quite fond of beating people by committee.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/CtWYjdnz71XQQ/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: fredrollon on July 21, 2018, 07:45:21 AM
And don't hit or push elders. They are much weaker than normal.

Is the shooter not a guy in his 40's?   A wee inadequate chap but hardly an elder.

Sounds like most Getbiggers tbf.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Zillotch on July 21, 2018, 07:50:47 AM
the savage, hateful pieces of shit likely would have beaten that old man to death.. good for him, he had the balls to save his own life.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: beakdoctor on July 21, 2018, 07:57:32 AM
good riddance.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 08:09:15 AM
Did you read any of the comments on youtube? The guy was defending his girlfriend from the man. The old man should have minded his own business..I'm sure if you found someone yelling at your spouse and children, having a civilized conversation and respectfully disagreeing with him would be the last thing on your mind.

The YouTube comments seem like a credible source of information.

So you agree with the guy tackling  the old dude to the ground but you don't agree with a scared old man then defending himself?

The old man should have minded his own business, no question. But a 28 year old man should have been able to recognize if the old man was an actual threat to his family or if he was just a cantankerous old man.

In the case of an actual threat the driver should have moved away or the husband should have had them move and not left them alone.

Even if the old man had appeared after the guy went in the store and the father came out and saw him standing yelling outside the car if he really thought he was a threat he wouldn't have stop with pushing him to the ground, he would have made sure he didn't get his gun out.

He reacted emotionally and sadly it cost him his life,  regardless of the shooter going to jail.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 21, 2018, 08:25:46 AM
The YouTube comments seem like a credible source of information.

So you agree with the guy tackling  the old dude to the ground but you don't agree with a scared old man then defending himself?

The old man should have minded his own business, no question. But a 28 year old man should have been able to recognize if the old man was an actual threat to his family or if he was just a cantankerous old man.

In the case of an actual threat the driver should have moved away or the husband should have had them move and not left them alone.

Even if the old man had appeared after the guy went in the store and the father came out and saw him standing yelling outside the car if he really thought he was a threat he wouldn't have stop with pushing him to the ground, he would have made sure he didn't get his gun out.

He reacted emotionally and sadly it cost him his life,  regardless of the shooter going to jail.

That old man was ARMED and the guy didn't see the gun as it was concealed...He was a threat to his family..
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 21, 2018, 08:26:36 AM
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/2c872cc4dc7a3058f7b60dca7ec7b37f/tenor.gif)

I'm surprised this guy is still alive
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 08:35:42 AM
That old man was ARMED and the guy didn't see the gun as it was concealed...He was a threat to his family..

So you agree with the father's actions of violence but you don't agree with the old man's actions of violence?

If the tackle would have killed the old man what would be your response?

As I said if he really believed the guy was a threat to his family he should have eliminated the threat and got his family out of there, so in that case he did his family a disservice.

It's strange that the threatening old man didn't carry out with the same actions on the family that he stopped shooting after firing on his attacker.

I understand wanting to protect your family, and if that's all this dude was doing he should have made sure he took care of the job and he would be alive today and the old man would be dead.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 21, 2018, 08:45:56 AM
You don't push an applebee without consequences shoeshine.


Works both ways, Quaker.   In fact, you should push anyone......usually has unexpected consequences
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 21, 2018, 08:59:29 AM
How exactly you know that, were you there when Trayvon was shot?

What comes to this situation, punk get what he deserve, end of story. Don't push people to the ground, means "don't give them any reason to use their right to defend themselves". Simple enough for you? No one have right to do what he did, but what he did gives a man a legal reason to defend himself by force. It wasn't bullet which killed him, it was stupidity. And bo ho hoo, weep weep, he had three children...so what? This could be the best way he could use to give his children's an example what they should not do in their life  ;D



George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 09:03:08 AM


George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   

How do you know he shot him out of anger? What if he shot him out of fear, or maybe he was reacting in love?

Also which of the two had gotten into previous arguments with other people, the shover or the shooter?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Royalty on July 21, 2018, 09:08:27 AM


George Zimmerman actively pursued a person he suspected was robbing homes ignoring what other officers on the phone advised and created the situation all because he was a young black man with a hoodie.  Fact is that Trayvon Martin was not guilty of any crime.  So what if he busted his nose....he was obviously fighting for his life.   George's continued issues with the law pretty much confirms that he was an asswipe.



This incident wasn't even really about race.   Man was yelling at the victim's wife and her husband came out and pushes him.  Guy pulls out a weapon to defend himself and the victim backs off....then he clearly shoots him out of anger.   This man already had gotten into previous arguments with other people.


That's the problem with guns.   Some people get them to defend themselves but forget about the "defend" part.   Civil court is going to tear him a new asshole.   

Trayvon Martin was not looking for trouble that night.... Zimmerman was looking to be a “hero”, and Zimmerman jumped to conclusions and he put Trayvon in a bad position. Trayvon sensed that he was being followed by an unstable man. And Trayvon attempted to deal with the fucked-up situation.

There is no doubt that Zimmerman is mentally unstable. Look at all the trouble that he has gotten into since then. He has a chip on his shoulder and is always getting himself into trouble.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 09:14:54 AM
Okay I've gotten more details.

The "old man" is 47, and likely a jackass, for some reason I thought he was 67.

I can understand the father coming out and "defending" his family but once he made the decision to engage he should have made sure he eliminated any threat, especially considering the father was a Florida resident and should have been away of the concealed weapons law.
 
But there is a good chance he didn't know about the law because his girlfriend who was parked in a handicap spot said she didn't do anything wrong.

Horrible situation, this dude girlfriend parking in a handicap spot cost him his life.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 21, 2018, 09:29:04 AM
How do you know he shot him out of anger? What if he shot him out of fear, or maybe he was reacting in love?

Also which of the two had gotten into previous arguments with other people, the shover or the shooter?


I don't entirely.  Its my analysis of the situation based on the camera at all.   For all I know, he could have pushed him because he had a bee on his hat and the guy accidently reached for his gun instead of his glasses. ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 21, 2018, 09:30:20 AM
That was a thing of beauty.

Should be shown at every school to deter the youth from thuggary.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: werewolf operative on July 21, 2018, 09:31:36 AM
He wuz a good boy...
(https://arrestfacts.com/ti/e600eaa0a0d7448a6cba711e37435c6e.jpg)

https://arrestfacts.com/Markeis-Mcglockton-753J41
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 21, 2018, 09:35:48 AM
Shit's about to get real in FL.   :o

"An argument over a handicapped parking spot at a convenience store in Florida led to a fatal shooting and the man who pulled the trigger won’t be arrested under the state’s “stand your ground” self-defense law, authorities said.

Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri told reporters during a Friday press conference that Thursday’s shooting death of Markeis McGlockton, a 28-year-old father of three, is “within the bookends of stand your ground and within the bookends of force being justified,” the Tampa Bay Times reports."


From 3 women?
All illegitimate and not paying child support.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: robcguns on July 21, 2018, 09:36:50 AM
You start shit,shit happens.good riddance criminal filth.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 21, 2018, 09:37:22 AM
He wuz a good boy...
(https://arrestfacts.com/ti/e600eaa0a0d7448a6cba711e37435c6e.jpg)

https://arrestfacts.com/Markeis-Mcglockton-753J41


He Dindu Nuffin wrong!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: seCrawler on July 21, 2018, 09:44:26 AM
I'm surprised this guy is still alive

I guess you've never been to Detriot or Chicago.  Unfortunately, black men are highly proficient at bumping each other off but are afraid of clowns like this. 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Notomorrow on July 21, 2018, 10:06:21 AM
Says argument was over a handicap parking spot..looks like the elderly man was telling this black family you cant park in handicap spaces...when thug black guy came out..said we park where the fuck we want and assaulted the elderly man...Got what he deserved...Not sure where the problem is?

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 21, 2018, 10:45:08 AM
haha i spose this another one for the NRA to chalk up as successful use of a gun to prevent a crime. country of fkin idiots lol.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 10:54:15 AM
haha i spose this another one for the NRA to chalk up as successful use of a gun to prevent a crime. country of fkin idiots lol.

This isn't  a situation you'll ever have to worry about.  You're not the type to confront aggressive people in  public stud.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 21, 2018, 11:21:10 AM
This isn't  a situation you'll ever have to worry about.  You're not the type to confront aggressive people in  public stud.

and you no doubt, (like the "hero" in this incident) are a real bad ass that'll confront anyone when you know you're carrying a gun. pussy
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: oldschoolfan on July 21, 2018, 11:28:02 AM
lesson of the story , avoid confrontation at all costs there are to many crazy people out there to begin with not worth getting shot, beat up etc over a parking spot
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 11:31:59 AM
and you no doubt, (like the "hero" in this incident) are a real bad ass that'll confront anyone when you know you're carrying a gun. pussy

Okay tough guy. Give me your address.

We'll how tough you are when I'm bringing my 19" guns to your front door.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 21, 2018, 11:37:59 AM
Okay tough guy. Give me your address.

We'll how tough you are when I'm bringing my 19" guns to your front door.


give me your address fagg0t. i'd rather it be at your front door
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 11:44:41 AM
give me your address fagg0t. i'd rather it be at your front door


No problem.

2019 N Nestor Ave Compton California 9022

And you don't have to worry about firearms because California has very tough gun laws.

When can I expect you here little chicken?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: oldschoolfan on July 21, 2018, 11:51:27 AM

No problem.

2019 N Nestor Ave Compton California 9022

And you don't have to worry about firearms because California has very tough gun laws.

When can I expect you here little chicken?

shouldnt you two settle this the classic getbig way , like stripping down to your underwear and hitting poses  ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 21, 2018, 11:52:31 AM

No problem.

2019 N Nestor Ave Compton California 9022

And you don't have to worry about firearms because California has very tough gun laws.

When can I expect you here little chicken?

on phone with my travel agent now. will be in touch shortly....
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 11:56:48 AM
on phone with my travel agent now. will be in touch shortly....


To much of a wimp to book it yourself.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 21, 2018, 12:01:26 PM
shouldnt you two settle this the classic getbig way , like stripping down to your underwear and hitting poses  ;D

Don't try to play hero here.

I can be in Michigan tomorrow if you have an issue with me.

I'll drop trou even faster.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: 20inch calves on July 21, 2018, 01:05:45 PM
Why was the black guy arguing over a handicap space? Was he handicapped? Hes young..i cant see the video but in his pic he looks young
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: robcguns on July 21, 2018, 01:16:36 PM
Why was the black guy arguing over a handicap space? Was he handicapped? Hes young..i cant see the video but in his pic he looks young

Cause he’s a fucking punk trouble maker.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG AL MCKECHNIE on July 21, 2018, 02:02:35 PM
Why was the black guy arguing over a handicap space? Was he handicapped? Hes young..i cant see the video but in his pic he looks young


He ain't getting any older.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 02:04:13 PM
Says argument was over a handicap parking spot..looks like the elderly man was telling this black family you cant park in handicap spaces...when thug black guy came out..said we park where the fuck we want and assaulted the elderly man...Got what he deserved...Not sure where the problem is?



Probably this.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 03:00:34 PM
He wuz a good boy...
(https://arrestfacts.com/ti/e600eaa0a0d7448a6cba711e37435c6e.jpg)

https://arrestfacts.com/Markeis-Mcglockton-753J41


Felony domestic battery

Resisting arrest with violence.

Disorderly conduct.

BIG FUCKING SURPRISE.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 03:03:20 PM
haha i spose this another one for the NRA to chalk up as successful use of a gun to prevent a crime. country of fkin idiots lol.

Yes.  Another violent felon taken off the street.  The country is better off.  Sad for his family though.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 03:36:47 PM
Felony domestic battery

Resisting arrest with violence.

Disorderly conduct.

BIG FUCKING SURPRISE.

+1

Advanced prefrontal cortex of Peace.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 21, 2018, 04:09:39 PM
Felony domestic battery

Resisting arrest with violence.

Disorderly conduct.

BIG FUCKING SURPRISE.

Maybe his wife/gf was relieved when he was shot.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 06:35:11 PM
Another violent chocolate faced thug doing what they do.  Too bad those phaggots in Los Angeles can't arm up and protect themselves like the dude in the OP.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/21/us/trader-joes-los-angeles/index.html

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 21, 2018, 06:40:54 PM
Another violent chocolate faced thug doing what they do.  Too bad those phaggots in Los Angeles can't arm up and protect themselves like the dude in the OP.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/21/us/trader-joes-los-angeles/index.html



"The suspect, who is in his late teens, shot his grandmother and a younger female earlier in the day, police said."  :-\
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 06:47:45 PM

"The suspect, who is in his late teens, shot his grandmother and a younger female earlier in the day, police said."  :-\

That how the press loves to describe these guys......"teens".
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Chadwick The Beta on July 21, 2018, 07:14:15 PM
I'm sure the mainstream media analysis of this situation will make no mention of Trayvon Jr blindsiding the guy and forcefully knocking him onto the cement ground.

Be careful who you fuck with chocolate face.  Some people look like easy victims...............bu t they ain't.

Theyll also use a pic of Ashtray from when he was five years old.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 21, 2018, 11:05:19 PM
Theyll also use a pic of Ashtray from when he was five years old.


Haha yes, trying to get some liberal sympathies of peace.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 21, 2018, 11:54:32 PM
Theyll also use a pic of Ashtray from when he was five years old.


Hahahaha!  Always.

He a good boy, he dindu nuffin.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 22, 2018, 12:03:02 AM
That how the press loves to describe these guys......"teens".

And "he was a good boy".  I bet he did the dishes for grandma before he gunned her down.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 12:06:02 AM
And "he was a good boy".  I bet he did the dishes for grandma before he gunned her down.

He was on his way to church.  Just about to turn his life around.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Anna Recksiek on July 22, 2018, 12:09:38 AM
I watched the video and it appeared the man who pushed the other man to the ground didn't really back off him until he saw the gun. It all happened pretty fast but the way the fella pushed the other guy down was uncalled for and a bad decision. He did advance on the downed man by 1 or two steps and was a threat. The speed the incident occurred will likely result in the gunman going free.

The family may try to sue but they have a very uphill battle. The guy will most likely shown up to court with an oxygen mask and in a wheelchair looking frail. The old guy was no match for the other physically and was assaulted first playing directly into the stand your ground law. The fact that the old guy fired from the seated position and didn't stand up first demonstrates that he was backed up as far as he could and felt cornered.

It sucks that the guy lost his life over this altercation.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 12:15:03 AM
I watched the video and it appeared the man who pushed the other man to the ground didn't really back off him until he saw the gun. It all happened pretty fast but the way the fella pushed the other guy down was uncalled for and a bad decision. He did advance on the downed man by 1 or two steps and was a threat. The speed the incident occurred will likely result in the gunman going free.

The family may try to sue but they have a very uphill battle. The guy will most likely shown up to court with an oxygen mask and in a wheelchair looking frail. The old guy was no match for the other physically and was assaulted first playing directly into the stand your ground law. The fact that the old guy fired from the seated position and didn't stand up first demonstrates that he was backed up as far as he could and felt cornered.

It sucks that the guy lost his life over this altercation.

Yep.   And the dude who assaulted him was a violent felon.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 22, 2018, 01:06:57 AM
I watched the video and it appeared the man who pushed the other man to the ground didn't really back off him until he saw the gun. It all happened pretty fast but the way the fella pushed the other guy down was uncalled for and a bad decision. He did advance on the downed man by 1 or two steps and was a threat. The speed the incident occurred will likely result in the gunman going free.

The family may try to sue but they have a very uphill battle. The guy will most likely shown up to court with an oxygen mask and in a wheelchair looking frail. The old guy was no match for the other physically and was assaulted first playing directly into the stand your ground law. The fact that the old guy fired from the seated position and didn't stand up first demonstrates that he was backed up as far as he could and felt cornered.

It sucks that the guy lost his life over this altercation.

Before assaulting the old man, he already had:

Felony domestic battery

Resisting arrest with violence.

Disorderly conduct.

on his record.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: pellius on July 22, 2018, 01:16:51 AM
Didn't read the whole thread but the guy did immediately back away when the gun was pulled. Seems to me the threat was over. Like Vince said, just because you can doesn't mean you should.

Either way props at the way the guy took the bullet. Didn't fall down and start screaming and crying. Just pressed against the wound to stop the bleeding and headed back into the store for help.

Anybody know how bad his bullet wound was?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Ted SuperSet on July 22, 2018, 01:27:09 AM
if a chocolateface pushes or threatens you in any way, shoot it.

posted safe from sweden basement  ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 22, 2018, 01:59:17 AM
Didn't read the whole thread but the guy did immediately back away when the gun was pulled. Seems to me the threat was over. Like Vince said, just because you can doesn't mean you should.

Either way props at the way the guy took the bullet. Didn't fall down and start screaming and crying. Just pressed against the wound to stop the bleeding and headed back into the store for help.

Anybody know how bad his bullet wound was?

bad enough to send him to the afterlife
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 02:00:03 AM
Didn't read the whole thread but the guy did immediately back away when the gun was pulled. Seems to me the threat was over. Like Vince said, just because you can doesn't mean you should.


Everybody wants the white guy to show restraint.  Very few have the courage or common sense to demand that the black guy show restraint.  He was the aggressor.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 22, 2018, 02:53:21 AM
posted safe from sweden basement  ;D

Sweden is far from safe these days, i was but a few hours away from getting flattened by the terrorist Rakhmat Akilov last year!

Had i decided to buy the gifts to my lady at the time i first had planned it, i would've been toast!

Thankfully (for me), i decided to purchase them earlier instead, but had i gone at the originally planned time, i would have been killed among the others on the street.

Sweden is not like it was in the 70's or 80's these days.

Burning cars , hand-grenades and people getting shot left and right with automatic weapons is now a daily occurance.

Women (and even young men) are under constant threat of being gang-raped due to the influx of MENA.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Disgusted on July 22, 2018, 10:43:56 AM
Everybody wants the white guy to show restraint.  Very few have the courage or common sense to demand that the black guy show restraint.  He was the aggressor.

I'm betting both of them were and are pretty much assholes in everyday life it's just that one of them had a gun.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: oldschoolfan on July 22, 2018, 10:48:56 AM
I'm betting both of them were and are pretty much assholes in everyday life it's just that one of them had a gun.

yep that sums it up about right. both fucking idiots
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 22, 2018, 12:08:09 PM
We're off to a great start.  A lot of educated debate, amongst the getbig scholars.  Peaceful protests have started, and it's only a matter of time before full "loot & riot" mode ensues.   :D

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on July 22, 2018, 12:11:11 PM
Glad he’s dead.

Too bad the man didn’t plug his family, too, while he was at it.

That female now can spit out even more useless chocolate faces.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: keanu on July 22, 2018, 12:56:40 PM
Lesson learned. When you push someone down, follow it up and knock them out. ::)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: keanu on July 22, 2018, 12:57:26 PM
Sweden is far from safe these days, i was but a few hours away from getting flattened by the terrorist Rakhmat Akilov last year!

Had i decided to buy the gifts to my lady at the time i first had planned it, i would've been toast!

Thankfully (for me), i decided to purchase them earlier instead, but had i gone at the originally planned time, i would have been killed among the others on the street.

Sweden is not like it was in the 70's or 80's these days.

Burning cars , hand-grenades and people getting shot left and right with automatic weapons is now a daily occurance.

Women (and even young men) are under constant threat of being gang-raped due to the influx of MENA.

Who are the dumbasses letting them in? Right...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: oldschoolfan on July 22, 2018, 01:01:34 PM
We're off to a great start.  A lot of educated debate, amongst the getbig scholars.  Peaceful protests have started, and it's only a matter of time before full "loot & riot" mode ensues.   :D



this is what is truly baffling to me, when another hoodrate shoots and kills a fellow hoodrate over some shoes, or weed its no big deal thats what ni--as do , but if a cracka does it, in self defence, they need to riot and protest. i would be willing to bet most of these losers do not even have jobs.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 22, 2018, 01:45:54 PM

Before assaulting the old man, he already had:

Felony domestic battery

Resisting arrest with violence.

Disorderly conduct.

on his record.


He served his time and paid his debt to society.

I agree k1 they should have talked it out and came to a sensible compromise.

this is what is truly baffling to me, when another hoodrate shoots and kills a fellow hoodrate over some shoes, or weed its no big deal thats what ni--as do , but if a cracka does it, in self defence, they need to riot and protest. i would be willing to bet most of these losers do not even have jobs.

It's sad that this community is blinded by race. Horrible situation  that the father of three lost his life. But he wasn't innocent in this nor was he a stand up community asset and make no mistake the gunman is likely trash as well.

This wasn't a Tyrvon Martin case, this was a documented violent individual who's demise was ultimately  the result of his own violent decision


To ask how many have to die before something is done is an awfully sad question because the citizens control the laws. All that needs to be done is a simple signature collection to create a proposal. People die because no one is trying to change what they can.  Sad.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Palumboism on July 22, 2018, 03:43:49 PM

To ask how many have to die before something is done is an awfully sad question because the citizens control the laws. All that needs to be done is a simple signature collection to create a proposal. People die because no one is trying to change what they can.  Sad.

That's the point.  The citizens of Clearwater wanted this law to protect themselves in situations like these.  And who do you think they're trying to protect themselves from.

This guy wasn't trying to protect his family.  His wife was breaking the law by parking in an handicap spot like I see black people do ALL the time and someone told here she shouldn't be parking there.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 22, 2018, 04:14:52 PM
That's the point.  The citizens of Clearwater wanted this law to protect themselves in situations like these.  And who do you think they're trying to protect themselves from.

This guy wasn't trying to protect his family.  His wife was breaking the law by parking in an handicap spot like I see black people do ALL the time and someone told here she shouldn't be parking there.




Are you having trouble reading what I wrote?

I understand why the law is in place.

I'm commenting on how stupid  the people protesting are. Nothing is going to be changed because of protests, marches, riots,"civil disobedience" and unrest.

If they want the law changed have it voted on.  At this point if they really believe "white" people are shooting "black" people with no repercussions and they haven't made any effort to change that than there is not much hope for said community as they will always play the victim.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 04:29:39 PM
Black people have all the power to stop this situation.  It's completely in their hands.

Stop committing violent crime.  The police will have no reason to arrest you, and white people will have no reason to shoot you.

Stand your ground laws exist because of people like you.  Don't like it?  Look in the mirror.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 22, 2018, 04:38:37 PM
this is what is truly baffling to me, when another hoodrate shoots and kills a fellow hoodrate over some shoes, or weed its no big deal thats what ni--as do , but if a cracka does it, in self defence, they need to riot and protest. i would be willing to bet most of these losers do not even have jobs.

This site does a good job of tracking that data in Chicago.  No riots though..hmm

https://heyjackass.com/home/
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: oldschoolfan on July 22, 2018, 04:42:32 PM
This site does a good job of tracking that data in Chicago.  No riots though..hmm

https://heyjackass.com/home/

Great post Chicago is a shithole like Detroit
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 04:47:03 PM
Great post Chicago is a shithole like Detroit

...and Cleveland, and Baltimore, and Atlanta.  Basically anywhere that blacks live in large numbers.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 22, 2018, 05:26:12 PM
Things are starting to pick up a bit.  The butt hurt is starting to flow.   ;D

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 05:53:21 PM
Things are starting to pick up a bit.  The butt hurt is starting to flow.   ;D



According to their signs. "Stand your ground" laws are racist.

So they concede that blacks will be the attackers and whites with be shooting them in self defense.  They just don't want to risk getting shot when they attack white people apparently.

Defending yourself is racist.  Fuck every one of these degenerate pieces of shit.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 22, 2018, 06:20:30 PM
According to their signs. "Stand your ground" laws are racist.

So they concede that blacks will be the attackers and whites with be shooting them in self defense.  They just don't want to risk getting shot when they attack white people apparently.

Defending yourself is racist.  Fuck every one of these degenerate pieces of shit.


That area is so ghetto circle k left and  they have a Circle A convenience store?



You might be right.

The family comments during the interview are sad.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 06:49:00 PM
Dindus doing what dindus do.

http://www.fox4news.com/news/dallas-couple-robbed-at-gunpoint#/
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 22, 2018, 06:59:58 PM
Dindus doing what dindus do.

http://www.fox4news.com/news/dallas-couple-robbed-at-gunpoint#/

These kids should be castrated, before going to prison.  Once they get out, no sense in having them reproduce.   >:(
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: WalterWhite on July 22, 2018, 07:03:04 PM

That area is so ghetto circle k left and  they have a Circle A convenience store?



You might be right.

The family comments during the interview are sad.


1:48 says it all. Wow.





Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 07:04:23 PM
These kids should be castrated, before going to prison.  Once they get out, no sense in having them reproduce.   >:(

Every day the same thing, all day and all night.  Hostile, aggressive, violent, criminal blacks attacking, robbing and raping whites.

.......and the few times whites defend themselves the unwashed ignorant black mob comes out to blame the victim and make demands.

Fuck you.  Raise your children.  Get a fucking job.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 22, 2018, 07:30:27 PM
2:32 says it all. Wow.







It's sad because that's a mindset that's likely based on her foundation of beliefs.  I can understand being upset a loved one is dead and wanting to blame someone but her whole thought process was the criminal was the victim.......

How do you change a culture?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 22, 2018, 10:03:57 PM
It's sad because that's a mindset that's likely based on her foundation of beliefs.  I can understand being upset a loved one is dead and wanting to blame someone but her whole thought process was the criminal was the victim.......

How do you change a culture?

Exactly.  It is a poisonous culture of ignorance, violence, and criminality with a complete disregard for anyone but themselves.

Why do black people feel entitled to violently attack people when they have disagreements?

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Powerlift66 on July 24, 2018, 08:20:21 AM
You ever read the court case notes on the Trayvon case? Totally not how the lib-media portrayed it.
George is a tard, Martin was a thug, 2 tards, one came out on top.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 24, 2018, 08:50:57 AM
He wuz a good boy...
(https://arrestfacts.com/ti/e600eaa0a0d7448a6cba711e37435c6e.jpg)

https://arrestfacts.com/Markeis-Mcglockton-753J41



2008....he hasn't had anything since then so its not a factor.   Now that all the reports are coming in about the situation, the shooter obviously had similiar disputes in the past and he was actually threatening the woman over the parking space which led to the victim pushing him away to the ground.


Shit is about to go down.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 24, 2018, 09:14:45 AM
Yeah, I forgot.  New rule.  All crimes committed before 2009 don't count any more.  Somebody tell Bill Cosby.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/TlK63ERYSGQsdqG04uc/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Royalty on July 24, 2018, 09:20:28 AM
Black dude should have just yelled at him..

..you can’t just shove a person down, full force onto concrete and think that you’re gonna get away with it.




Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: The Scott on July 24, 2018, 09:23:34 AM
Yeah, I forgot.  New rule.  All crimes committed before 2009 don't count any more.  Somebody tell Bill Cosby.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/TlK63ERYSGQsdqG04uc/giphy.gif)
;D ;D

I think that only applies to actual, proven and prosecuted crimes.  Not heresay from talentless menopausal womens.  Libtards want the statute of limitations to become more a stature of imitations.  That way they can # themselves stupider parroting one another while trying to fleece productive people.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 24, 2018, 09:29:44 AM
Yeah, I forgot.  New rule.  All crimes committed before 2009 don't count any more.  Somebody tell Bill Cosby.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/TlK63ERYSGQsdqG04uc/giphy.gif)


I see it as someone who cleaned up his act
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 24, 2018, 09:37:21 AM

I see it as someone who cleaned up his act

Did you not watch the video?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: The Scott on July 24, 2018, 09:38:17 AM

I see it as someone who cleaned up his act

So you can see with your eyes closed?  I suppose you're using your "heart" to see within his mind...  Get back to us when someone violently shoves you to the ground.  Are you just gonna challenge him to a posedown? 

(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/aa/3d/2e/aa3d2ee24f6b8d13528c42c3e1befeb9.jpg)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 24, 2018, 09:41:27 AM
Did you not watch the video?


Did you not read my first post.   I said the push was not warranted and the guy had a legal right to shoot him.   But it still not the right thing to do and that's the problem.   
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 24, 2018, 09:43:42 AM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.


Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: The Scott on July 24, 2018, 09:46:14 AM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.

*SNICKER*
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Royalty on July 24, 2018, 09:59:16 AM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.


As far as the guy arguing over the parking spot, he wasn’t trying to start a fight. That was not a set up. In his mind, his motive was pure. He wanted to speak his mind about the misuse of the handicap spot.

He didn’t realize that he was going to get slammed hard onto the concrete by a third party.

He wasn’t trying to set up a “stand your ground” shooting.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 24, 2018, 10:34:20 AM

Did you not read my first post.   I said the push was not warranted and the guy had a legal right to shoot him.   But it still not the right thing to do and that's the problem.   

If he cleaned up his act then why is he still out committing assault and battery?

He's a violent thug who fucked with the wrong guy.  Hopefully this will make the dindu army think twice before attempting to "culturally enrich" people.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on July 24, 2018, 11:48:09 AM
He wuz a good boy...
(https://arrestfacts.com/ti/e600eaa0a0d7448a6cba711e37435c6e.jpg)

https://arrestfacts.com/Markeis-Mcglockton-753J41


Any sane non-black can take one look at this neegur and immediately recognize he’s NOT fit for a civilized and sophisticated society.

His facial aesthetics betray his substantially less-evolved state.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on July 24, 2018, 11:48:46 AM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.




Plonker
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 24, 2018, 12:03:25 PM

I see it as someone who cleaned up his act

Vince would you want this type of individual as a neighbor?

Based on the video do you really think he cleaned up his behavior and he lost his cool in an emotional moment or do you think he hasn't been as reckless since 2008 so he hasn't been caught.

With all your experience as a corrections officer it's interesting you believe a young man with a history of domestic violence would have learned to stop that practice. Emotional violent people tend to stay true to their character, as the video shows.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on July 24, 2018, 12:57:35 PM
Vince would you want this type of individual as a neighbor?

Based on the video do you really think he cleaned up his behavior and he lost his cool in an emotional moment or do you think he hasn't been as reckless since 2008 so he hasn't been caught.

With all your experience as a corrections officer it's interesting you believe a young man with a history of domestic violence would have learned to stop that practice. Emotional violent people tend to stay true to their character, as the video shows.

I'm not condoning this man's actions.  The problem is that the man backed up and he still shot him.  If he charged at him, there would be no conversation.

He had every right to shoot him legally....BUT IT WAS BAD IDEA.  As far as experience, its mixed.  Some people are repeat offenders and others are not

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Powerlift66 on July 24, 2018, 01:10:47 PM
It looks like black dude lifted his shirt, may have been nothing there, but is the full story out yet? I doubt it.
It never fully comes out in libtard media...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 24, 2018, 02:09:14 PM
I'm not condoning this man's actions.  The problem is that the man backed up and he still shot him.  If he charged at him, there would be no conversation.

He had every right to shoot him legally....BUT IT WAS BAD IDEA.  As far as experience, its mixed.  Some people are repeat offenders and others are not



I think everyone agrees it was a bad idea to shoot him, but it he wasn't backing up until the gun was pointing at him (and the video may show he didn't back up until he was shot, I don't actually remember), he was progressing towards him. I'm not a fan of the law but it appears he was well with in his "legal right".
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 24, 2018, 02:29:19 PM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.




Your pea brain doesn't let you gather much that's your problem. My father used to say " Never start trouble and don't run from it either."

the 'stand your ground' law... a person has a right to expect absolute safety in a place they have a right to be, and may use deadly force to repel an unlawful intruder."
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Tennisballz on July 24, 2018, 03:21:43 PM
as far as i can gather , "stand your ground" is just a licence for faggoty dudes to start sht with people, then when they're about to get the beat down they've provoked they can legally blow the other fella to smithereens.



Well if you have impulse control problems then you'll fall for it every time.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: nicorulez on July 24, 2018, 03:53:18 PM
1:48 says it all. Wow.







The funny thing is I bet you a black female shot his punk ass. If she were white, it would have led the story. The guy was ripping off a house in his neighborhodd...i.e. the hood. Fucking Democrat. Trump 2020 and beyond.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 25, 2018, 12:41:36 AM
Your pea brain doesn't let you gather much that's your problem. My father used to say " Never start trouble and don't run from it either."

the 'stand your ground' law... a person has a right to expect absolute safety in a place they have a right to be, and may use deadly force to repel an unlawful intruder."

well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot.

"unlwaful intruder" ?
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation. he didn't just maybe pass a comment about the woman being parked in a disabled bay, he stood there remonstrating with her for quite some time.

given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Ropo on July 25, 2018, 01:13:35 AM
well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot.

"unlwaful intruder" ?
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation. he didn't just maybe pass a comment about the woman being parked in a disabled bay, he stood there remonstrating with her for quite some time.

given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.

Do you really think that you can somehow justify what that nignog did? Old geezer was by the car telling that disabled parking space is for disabled only, and he has all rights to do so. On the other hand, no one have right to do what that nignog did, that is an assault, and what comes next was completely legal reaction to that assault. Problem solved, one less criminal on this planet. If you want to live, don't shove old geezers because they have right to end your miserable life  ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 25, 2018, 03:37:59 AM
well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot.

"unlwaful intruder" ?
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation. he didn't just maybe pass a comment about the woman being parked in a disabled bay, he stood there remonstrating with her for quite some time.

given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.

Quote
well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot

You're always making excuses for criminals and terrorists so it's safe to assume your daddy wasn't around or one of the fore mentioned. 

Quote
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation
  Clearly instigated a conversation. In civilized society people converse about issues and problems , when one party decides to escalate it to violence these laws are to protect normal civilized people from exactly what transpired. But for the FACT this guy turned to violence , he would still be alive if he didn't.

Quote
given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.

The biggest mistake he made was turning to violence and he paid the ultimate price for that. Again , you constantly make excuses for criminals. If this idiot just said his peace and left it at that he'd be alive. He escalated it ALL his fault.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Powerlift66 on July 25, 2018, 04:51:21 AM
well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot.

"unlwaful intruder" ?
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation. he didn't just maybe pass a comment about the woman being parked in a disabled bay, he stood there remonstrating with her for quite some time.

given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.

One of the dumber things you've said, and that's hard to do, even for you...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on July 25, 2018, 05:26:00 AM
You're always making excuses for criminals and terrorists so it's safe to assume your daddy wasn't around or one of the fore mentioned. 
  Clearly instigated a conversation. In civilized society people converse about issues and problems , when one party decides to escalate it to violence these laws are to protect normal civilized people from exactly what transpired. But for the FACT this guy turned to violence , he would still be alive if he didn't.

The biggest mistake he made was turning to violence and he paid the ultimate price for that. Again , you constantly make excuses for criminals. If this idiot just said his peace and left it at that he'd be alive. He escalated it ALL his fault.

BS. he didn't "instigate a conversation" he was harassing a woman for parking in disabled bay and it was prolonged harassment. i can understand why people like yourself would side with the faggoty gun dude. that's understandable.

me personally, if i start harassing some random woman because she's parked illegally or whatever i fully expect if her husband/BF or whoever turns up there's a good chance it's going to end in a physical altercation. as i don't have laws that allow me just to shoot someone after my jackassery has led to them wanting to fight with me, i tend to tailor my actions to suit.

another problem with mass gun ownership. fagg0t with gun = brave fagg0t = dangerous fagg0t time bomb
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: bigkid on July 25, 2018, 06:07:31 AM
Everything changes when things become physical.  Don't know why that's so hard to understand.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 25, 2018, 06:30:42 AM
Everything changes when things become physical.  Don't know why that's so hard to understand.

Exactly, clear proof that the micronutrient profile matters and it's not just calories.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on July 25, 2018, 09:33:12 AM
BS. he didn't "instigate a conversation" he was harassing a woman for parking in disabled bay and it was prolonged harassment. i can understand why people like yourself would side with the faggoty gun dude. that's understandable.

me personally, if i start harassing some random woman because she's parked illegally or whatever i fully expect if her husband/BF or whoever turns up there's a good chance it's going to end in a physical altercation. as i don't have laws that allow me just to shoot someone after my jackassery has led to them wanting to fight with me, i tend to tailor my actions to suit.

another problem with mass gun ownership. fagg0t with gun = brave fagg0t = dangerous fagg0t time bomb

Yelling at someone isn't harassment , and you're okay with violence just not when it involves a gun , more of your warped logic

Me personally , I wouldn't have shot him ,once I pulled out the gun and he backed off that would've been the extent of it.

He started the violence and the guy with the gun ended it. That simple ,if that moron didn't shove dude he'd be alive today. Play stupid games ,win stupid prizes
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: bigkid on July 25, 2018, 09:54:16 AM
Yelling at someone isn't harassment , and you're okay with violence just not when it involves a gun , more of your warped logic

Me personally , I wouldn't have shot him ,once I pulled out the gun and he backed off that would've been the extent of it.

He started the violence and the guy with the gun ended it. That simple ,if that moron didn't shove dude he'd be alive today. Play stupid games ,win stupid prizes
I agree.  I carry once in awhile.  I wouldn't actually fire unless I felt my life was in true danger.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Zillotch on July 25, 2018, 10:55:43 AM
He started the violence and the guy with the gun ended it.

a thing of beauty. send them all straight to hell.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 25, 2018, 03:29:03 PM
Wuz a good boy


Wuz Kang...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: robcguns on July 25, 2018, 07:48:42 PM
well judging on how your basement dwelling ass turned out your father was probably a fkin idiot.

"unlwaful intruder" ?
it was in a car park you absolute cretin and the shooter clearly instigated the confrontation. he didn't just maybe pass a comment about the woman being parked in a disabled bay, he stood there remonstrating with her for quite some time.

given how things seem to work in the US, the biggest mistake the hebrew fella made was when he came out of the shop and saw this turd talking sht to his gf he should have knocked him down and kicked him unconscious and not given the POS a chance to go for a gun.

This guy is fucked
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: SOMEPARTS on July 25, 2018, 08:45:30 PM
While this is legal - this guy has to live with killing somebody over a parking space.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon3 on July 25, 2018, 08:50:19 PM
While this is legal - this guy has to live with killing somebody over a parking space.
most Americans can live with that
as long as they win
that's all that matters
nobody cares about some dead loser anyway
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Eyeball Chambers on July 25, 2018, 10:52:09 PM
He didn't kill him over a parking space, he killed him because he's a savage that would endanger good peoples lives.

I sleep well knowing this violent thug is rotting in hell.

 ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 26, 2018, 04:22:20 AM
While this is legal - this guy has to live with killing somebody over a parking space.

I think that's a bit of an oversimplification.

Also, this guy probably stopped future violent crimes from being committed.  No big loss.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: SuperTed on July 26, 2018, 06:27:04 AM
Black dude should have just yelled at him..

..you can’t just shove a person down, full force onto concrete and think that you’re gonna get away with it.


This.

The moment he made things physical, he elevated the situation dramatically.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 26, 2018, 06:37:04 AM
This.

The moment he made things physical, he elevated the situation dramatically.

And that wasn't just any push.  It was done with extreme violence from the blind side knocking a dude onto cement.

He could have hit his head and been killed.  It happens all the time.  People who are defending the chocolate fuckface are wrong.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: beakdoctor on July 26, 2018, 06:55:44 AM
Nobody really "cares" about this sack o shit.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 26, 2018, 07:24:14 AM
While this is legal - this guy has to live with killing somebody over a parking space.

I would have problems with killing someone in let's say a driving accident. Crashing into a car and a mother and her daughter died for example, that's hard to live it,


But killing a thug that attacked me? Not losing sleep over that one.

I would feel rather good about that actually.

One less thug out and about assaulting people.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: deadz on July 26, 2018, 07:41:24 AM
Jig got what he deserved.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 26, 2018, 07:43:39 AM
Good boi, dindu nuttin, church choir and sheeit!

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on July 26, 2018, 07:46:17 AM
^^^

So much bullshit in this press conference.   :D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 26, 2018, 08:24:50 AM
^^^

So much bullshit in this press conference.   :D

I tried watching it but I couldn't.  An attorney shouldn't use the word "dis" when trying to say "this".  Marble mouthed ignoramus.

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: BIG DUB on July 26, 2018, 09:22:40 AM
I think this guy should have had a civilized conversation with these men who attacked his girlfriend and asked them to leave them alone  ;D

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: The Scott on July 26, 2018, 06:17:09 PM
I think this guy should have had a civilized conversation with these men who attacked his girlfriend and asked them to leave them alone  ;D



**SNIF**...That was beeeeutiful, man!  Thankewveruhmuch! ;D
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: SuperTed on July 27, 2018, 02:49:22 AM
 ::)

(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/Di4EaA6WwAIbcM9.jpg)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 27, 2018, 04:05:06 AM
::)


Oh jeez.  I don't have the words to describe how gay that is.  Fuck be upon whoever made this.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 27, 2018, 04:10:37 AM
Oh jeez.  I don't have the words to describe how gay that is.  Fuck be upon whoever made this.

(https://cdn.creators.com/588/167604/167604_image.jpg)


Andy Marlette is the bald guy with the nose.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: stuntmovie on July 27, 2018, 09:17:31 AM
Above is interesting conversation ... most of it.

If you carry a weapon legally (such as this old guy did/does) I'd recommend that you go to the USCCA website and download the 2018
Complete Concealed Carry and Family Defense Guide and possibly even consider the 'insurance plans' that are offered in the event you find it necessary to protect yourself or others.

Thanks for both sides of this interesting conversation!

Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 27, 2018, 09:20:55 AM
Andy Marlette is the bald guy with the nose.


Dickless cuck.  Spends his days doodling cartoons and daydreaming about cock.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: stuntmovie on July 27, 2018, 10:01:16 AM
I forgot to add this to my recent post but ...... I believe that the Florida Stand Your Ground law includes an immunity from prosecution and CIVIL LAwSUITS if the person uses justifiable deadly force.


Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 27, 2018, 11:17:57 AM
I forgot to add this to my recent post but ...... I believe that the Florida Stand Your Ground law includes an immunity from prosecution and CIVIL LAwSUITS if the person uses justifiable deadly force.




I hope.  I know they did that at one time but I'm not sure it's still in effect.  It should be.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Mobil on July 27, 2018, 10:59:26 PM
if the perpetrator had been white(white vs white).... this wouldn't have made the news(MSM)....but since its "White vs Black" msm pushes it really hard to push their narrative... yet other stories/incidents...when its Black vs White(blacks attacking whites)..when there is alot of security footage to show the attack.... it never makes MSM...not even a peep.... just internet article with actual security cameras to back up what happened....theres some pretty gruesome stories in the USA, never makes MSM...things that make you go hmmmmm

so you ask yourself..... why is the MSM doing this? who owns and runs these outlets?  and why are they pushing this narrative so hard??? do some research. if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.... its a duck!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: seCrawler on July 28, 2018, 02:14:44 AM
the problem is, the bitch didn't keep her ass in the car and roll up her windows vs. confronting (a big issue with some black women, thinking they can chest up to any man). secondly, she stated, she had the right to park anywhere she wanted. now, add a trigger finger redneck hillbilly in the south and a negro with anger management issues, and you have a bad recipe. I just wonder how this plays out if she doesn't get out the car.  is it just a normal day of him visiting the convenience store, complaining about the handicap spot, or he was on a mission like joe mcknights' killer, in which mcknight never touched the man.

 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 28, 2018, 05:50:27 AM

2008....he hasn't had anything since then so its not a factor.   Now that all the reports are coming in about the situation, the shooter obviously had similiar disputes in the past and he was actually threatening the woman over the parking space which led to the victim pushing him away to the ground.


Shit is about to go down.

Typical black logic comparing a "dispute" to a felony. lol
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 28, 2018, 05:52:28 AM
While this is legal - this guy has to live with killing somebody defending his life over a parking space.

Fixed it for you
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Devon97 on July 28, 2018, 06:00:00 AM
a few re-occurring themes in these types of threads as evidenced by the local GB hebrew responses:

1) don't ever let evidence get in the way of an argument with a black man

2) even reasonable law-abiding blacks tend to be very sympathetic to the criminal black when a white person kills the thug felon in self defense

3) despite being the instigator , the black man always will play the victim
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 28, 2018, 07:15:22 AM
a few re-occurring themes in these types of threads as evidenced by the local GB hebrew responses:

1) don't ever let evidence get in the way of an argument with a black man

2) even reasonable law-abiding blacks tend to be very sympathetic to the criminal black when a white person kills the thug felon in self defense

3) despite being the instigator , the black man always will play the victim

Yep, also.....

1) Don't dare question or disagree with a black person.  (don't make the black kids angry)

2) Crime is the new black entitlement (from illegal parking to violent assault)

3) Any consequences that blacks suffer for their actions are unjust and the result of white racism.  (they dindu nuffin)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on July 28, 2018, 07:46:43 PM
The only good Dindu is a dead Dindu.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fischputza on July 29, 2018, 09:53:09 AM
He would have been shot by some other dindu in the near future anyway....so what has he lost? Nothing!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 29, 2018, 05:18:41 PM
He would have been shot by some other dindu in the near future anyway....so what has he lost? Nothing!

Society won.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on July 30, 2018, 09:01:28 AM
(https://static-1.bitchute.com/live/channel_images/5jZwAGYGBhAM/4ZzOoDLVRYXEiIV5L9sYar41_large.jpg)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: stuntmovie on July 30, 2018, 09:32:43 AM
This may or may not be relevent but I think that judges should heavily fine those lawyers who represent individuals who file frivolous cases.

(Now I gotta check the dictionaey for frivolous)

FRIVOLOUS... characterized by lack of seriousness or sense.

I guess that makes sense.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: bigkid on July 30, 2018, 10:48:44 AM
Why are blacks so violent?  I was reading the FB comments on the guy who allegedly stole a baseball from the kid at the Cubs game.  Every black woman responding was saying how they would have "beat his ass" or some other wording of how they would have physically attacked him.  So unnecessary.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on July 30, 2018, 11:26:59 AM
Why are blacks so violent?  I was reading the FB comments on the guy who allegedly stole a baseball from the kid at the Cubs game.  Every black woman responding was saying how they would have "beat his ass" or some other wording of how they would have physically attacked him.  So unnecessary.

It's in their nature.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Disgusted on July 31, 2018, 09:04:39 PM
Got a gun pulled on me at a Walmart parking lot today. I was backing out of a parking space I didn't even get 3 inches when my car sensor went off. Looked behind me and at first saw nothing then this older guy with a buggy walks behind my car and he's very close. He starts to yell something but my windows are up and I don't hear him. So as I'm backing out he's still looking back mumbling.

So I back out and he's at his truck about 50 ft further down from my car. He's on the passenger side putting his bags in the car. I pulled up probabley about 30 feet away and said hey buddy sorry bout that which I didn't need to do cause I didn't do anything but I felt bad. I said you were pretty close but I saw you. So he starts yelling about how he has bad knees and other shit then says to me MOVE ALONG!!! I said what the hell is wrong with you I'm apologizing and don't tell me to move along. Well that's when I saw the rage in his eyes lol. He reached for his gun under his shirt and just as he was about to get it all the way out of his holster I took off. I had my gun right beside me on the passenger seat but decided not to engage. People be crazy.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 31, 2018, 09:15:18 PM
Black dude should have just yelled at him..

..you can’t just shove a person down, full force onto concrete and think that you’re gonna get away with it.






But then, you can't shoot someone dead who is backing up because they pushed you to the ground.... I guess in Florida you can but jeez... If I want to kill someone I don't like, I simply have to provoke them until they throw a punch or shove me and I can shoot them dead? That's pretty messed up. Dude shot the guy for shoving him  and looks like unless the District Attorney grows some balls, will get away with it. 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 31, 2018, 09:22:26 PM
But then, you can't shoot someone dead who is backing up because they pushed you to the ground.... I guess in Florida you can but jeez... If I want to kill someone I don't like, I simply have to provoke them until they throw a punch or shove me and I can shoot them dead? That's pretty messed up. Dude shot the guy for shoving him  and looks like unless the District Attorney grows some balls, will get away with it. 
 
Watch the video again please.  If you still feel that was a simple shove then I've got nothing.

The dude unloaded into him,  if that was a football game that would be a highlight feel hit.

He shouldn't have lost his life but the shooter was reacting off a delayed reaction. I'm sure he thought his life was in danger, as he was cleary discombobulated.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 31, 2018, 09:33:41 PM
 
Watch the video again please.  If you still feel that was a simple shove then I've got nothing.

The dude unloaded into him,  if that was a football game that would be a highlight feel hit.

He shouldn't have lost his life but the shooter was reacting off a delayed reaction. I'm sure he thought his life was in danger, as he was cleary discombobulated.

I watched it. It was certainly a hard shove. Unwarranted. I doubt the shooter should have had a gun in the first place. People who make it their lifes mission to confront people parking in a handicap spot probably aren't very good candidates. 

The only time deadly force should be used is when you are in fear of your life. Not when you are discombobulated... not when you are pissed you were shoved. Thats called manslaugter. I am not familiar with Florida law though I am moving there in 2 weeks.. but if the law allows you to kill someone for shoving or hitting you but were backing away knowing you were going for a gun and you still shoot them.. I believe in most states that would be considered unjustified.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Dave D on July 31, 2018, 09:38:49 PM
I watched it. It was certainly a hard shove. Unwarranted. I doubt the shooter should have had a gun in the first place. People who make it their lifes mission to confront people parking in a handicap spot probably aren't very good candidates. 

The only time deadly force should be used is when you are in fear of your life. Not when you are discombobulated... not when you are pissed you were shoved. Thats called manslaugter. I am not familiar with Florida law though I am moving there in 2 weeks.. but if the law allows you to kill someone for shoving or hitting you but were backing away knowing you were going for a gun and you still shoot them.. I believe in most states that would be considered unjustified.

Fair enough. I'm not necessarily  disagreeing  with you, but both men were hot heads.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on July 31, 2018, 10:17:19 PM
Fair enough. I'm not necessarily  disagreeing  with you, but both men were hot heads.

No doubt... one was parked in a handicap spot, actually one of my pet peeves... Saw some stranger accosting his wife about it when he exited the store and shoved him to the ground

The other, interrupted in his tirade at the woman about illegally parking, drew his weapon and shot and killed the person..

Like you, I'm not saying both didn't overreact. I'm just saying one of them overreacted causing the death of the other. 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on August 01, 2018, 02:44:58 AM
I’m flabbergasted some are debating all this.

Guy hard-shoved another to the ground and caught a bullet for his effort.

He croaked.

All seems “right” to me.

Any aggressive physical assault is gonna elicit a reaction ... of some type and effectiveness.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Conker on August 01, 2018, 08:10:52 AM
Got a gun pulled on me at a Walmart parking lot today. I was backing out of a parking space I didn't even get 3 inches when my car sensor went off. Looked behind me and at first saw nothing then this older guy with a buggy walks behind my car and he's very close. He starts to yell something but my windows are up and I don't hear him. So as I'm backing out he's still looking back mumbling.

So I back out and he's at his truck about 50 ft further down from my car. He's on the passenger side putting his bags in the car. I pulled up probabley about 30 feet away and said hey buddy sorry bout that which I didn't need to do cause I didn't do anything but I felt bad. I said you were pretty close but I saw you. So he starts yelling about how he has bad knees and other shit then says to me MOVE ALONG!!! I said what the hell is wrong with you I'm apologizing and don't tell me to move along. Well that's when I saw the rage in his eyes lol. He reached for his gun under his shirt and just as he was about to get it all the way out of his holster I took off. I had my gun right beside me on the passenger seat but decided not to engage. People be crazy.


holy fk what a crazy society! minor routine parking altercation nearly ends with pistols at dawn. this sht is just insane to me!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Disgusted on August 01, 2018, 10:59:31 AM

holy fk what a crazy society! minor routine parking altercation nearly ends with pistols at dawn. this sht is just insane to me!

Yep pretty fucked up. Carrying a gun gives some people balls they never would have if they weren't carrying. With me it's made me the opposite. If I start a fight then kill someone I'm going to jail so I opt to just look the other way. Walmart has cameras, if they didn't this might have ended differently.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on August 01, 2018, 11:42:57 AM
If I lived in Florida, I’d be blasting ‘tards left and right.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon3 on August 01, 2018, 06:17:57 PM
If I lived in Florida, I’d be blasting ‘tards left and right.
Nah that's the great thing about America: The liberals of the country are all anti-gun, so they don't generally carry them and are terrified to start fights with the very same people they're protesting against in the streets.

Street protests don't do anything but serve as fodder for the left-wing media's talking heads to inflate the country's alleged discontent with its government's policies (like 1% of the population are actually demonstrating) and Europeans who use it as a shield to deflect the misery of their new normal with the shitskins next door by pointing out how bad life in the U.S. is if even whites are marching.

In other words, conservatives never need to point a gun let alone pull a trigger. The shithead whackos with stretched ears and sleeve tattoos are as insignificant to us as mosquitoes stuck to the wiper blades of a Peterbilt.

But yeah, if ever one comes into my property, out comes my 10mm glock and my ground will be stood.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 01, 2018, 07:33:27 PM
If I lived in Florida, I’d be blasting ‘tards left and right.

wow, good thing you don't live in Florida then  ::)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on August 01, 2018, 09:16:47 PM
Tray Tray 3.0? (https://www.facebook.com/Funmasti.5050/videos/941274439356048/)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on August 01, 2018, 10:02:01 PM
Tray Tray 3.0? (https://www.facebook.com/Funmasti.5050/videos/941274439356048/)

He a good boy, church choir, college and shit. :-\
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 02, 2018, 03:49:53 AM

holy fk what a crazy society! minor routine parking altercation nearly ends with pistols at dawn. this sht is just insane to me!

In your " society " a 3 year old gets acid thrown in it's face , you can get arrested for typing mean things online , can't have fast food adverts or bikini adverts in public or god forbid you carry a pocket knife  ::) what was that about insane?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Fortress on August 02, 2018, 06:40:08 AM
The fall of England is shockingly swift.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon on August 02, 2018, 06:44:17 AM
(https://media1.tenor.com/images/45be7a2ce8db95af881c5b965c1d1d1f/tenor.gif?itemid=10275294)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on August 13, 2018, 12:10:58 PM
 I dont agree with this out of principle.  Public outcry led to this but no way on a conviction


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/13/shooter-in-fatal-florida-stand-your-ground-case-arrested-for-manslaughter.html
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 13, 2018, 09:42:48 PM
I dont agree with this out of principle.  Public outcry led to this but no way on a conviction


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/13/shooter-in-fatal-florida-stand-your-ground-case-arrested-for-manslaughter.html

So if you push me to the ground  because I am accosting your significant other in a parking lot over a parking violation, I would have the right to shoot you?

I'm really hoping you just don't understand the circumstances and aren't that stupid
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon3 on August 13, 2018, 09:49:56 PM
So if you push me to the ground  because I am accosting your significant other in a parking lot over a parking violation, I would have the right to shoot you?

I'm really hoping you just don't understand the circumstances and aren't that stupid
Who's fit to decide when deadly force is necessary? Do you need to be female or elderly or a minority to feel threatened at a specific point? Or can everyone feel the same way? In other, that law is deliberately vague for the reasons the castle laws in other states aren't: those laws tie your hands to either the intruder being inside your house or threatening you with deadly force themselves. Chasing after they with a gun, for instance, is prosecutable. With Stand your Ground, they left it up to technology (like cameras, which were used in that article against the shooter), eyewitnesses, and old-fashioned detective work to decide whether it was justified or not, rather that a law that straitjackets them into arresting everyone who might be just below the threshold for using deadly life (as with the house-related SYG laws).

The article gives it away: The dindu who got blasted parked in a handicap spot he had no right to park it in, was asked to move, and got an attitude (and a bullet).

“He told deputies that he had to shoot to defend himself. Those are the facts and that’s the law,” he said. “No matter how you slice it or dice it that was a violent push to the ground.”

The dispute began when Drejka began arguing with McGlockton’s girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, 25, because she was parked in a handicapped parking space without a permit. With her were two of their children, a 3-year-old and a 4-month old.

McGlockton got involved when he came out of the store with his 5-year-old son.

The complaint stated that detectives recorded the crime scene with a 3D scanner showing that the distance between Drejka and McGlockton at the time of the shooting was about 12 feet.

It also stated that the findings of the autopsy were consistent with the video footage of the shooting in which McGlockton appeared to be turning away from Drejka when he was shot.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 13, 2018, 09:52:34 PM
Who's fit to decide when deadly force is necessary? Do you need to be female or elderly or a minority to feel threatened at a specific point? Or can everyone feel the same way? In other, that law is deliberately vague for the reasons the castle laws in other states aren't: those laws tie your hands to either the intruder being inside your house or threatening you with deadly force themselves. Chasing after they with a gun, for instance, is prosecutable. With Stand your Ground, they left it up to technology (like cameras, which were used in that article against the shooter), eyewitnesses, and old-fashioned detective work to decide whether it was justified or not, rather that a law that straitjackets them into arresting everyone who might be just below the threshold for using deadly life (as with the house-related SYG laws).

The article gives it away: The dindu who got blasted parked in a handicap spot he had no right to park it in, was asked to move, and got an attitude (and a bullet).

“He told deputies that he had to shoot to defend himself. Those are the facts and that’s the law,” he said. “No matter how you slice it or dice it that was a violent push to the ground.”

The dispute began when Drejka began arguing with McGlockton’s girlfriend, Britany Jacobs, 25, because she was parked in a handicapped parking space without a permit. With her were two of their children, a 3-year-old and a 4-month old.

McGlockton got involved when he came out of the store with his 5-year-old son.

The complaint stated that detectives recorded the crime scene with a 3D scanner showing that the distance between Drejka and McGlockton at the time of the shooting was about 12 feet.

It also stated that the findings of the autopsy were consistent with the video footage of the shooting in which McGlockton appeared to be turning away from Drejka when he was shot.

But the video shows clearly he didn't have to shoot to defend himself. The Gun itself was apparently enough to stop the threat. I'm glad it will go to court to be heard by a jury and decided in a court of law
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Kwon3 on August 13, 2018, 09:55:56 PM
But the video shows clearly he didn't have to shoot to defend himself. The Gun itself was apparently enough to stop the threat. I'm glad it will go to court to be heard by a jury and decided in a court of law
Like I said, the footage and some 3D re-enactments by the cops (i.e. detective work) determined it wasn't justified in this case. It is NOT like the Trayvon Martin incident, where the victim's nose was broken and his head caved in partially by repeated violent blows to the head by a lanky and angry black teenager who was straddling him and had no intention of stopping.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 13, 2018, 09:58:45 PM
Like I said, the footage and some 3D re-enactments by the cops (i.e. detective work) determined it wasn't justified in this case. It is NOT like the Trayvon Martin incident, where the victim's nose was broken and his head caved in partially by repeated violent blows to the head by a lanky and angry black teenager who was straddling him and had no intention of stopping.

Just not used to agreeing with you. my bad
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on August 13, 2018, 10:10:11 PM
So if you push me to the ground  because I am accosting your significant other in a parking lot over a parking violation, I would have the right to shoot you?

I'm really hoping you just don't understand the circumstances and aren't that stupid


Try reading what I type....you even quoted it ::)
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 13, 2018, 10:19:46 PM

Try reading what I type....you even quoted it ::)

Try answering the question
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Powerlift66 on August 13, 2018, 11:00:30 PM
Like I said, the footage and some 3D re-enactments by the cops (i.e. detective work) determined it wasn't justified in this case. It is NOT like the Trayvon Martin incident, where the victim's nose was broken and his head caved in partially by repeated violent blows to the head by a lanky and angry black teenager who was straddling him and had no intention of stopping.

Im glad someone knows what happened and just didnt take the media's word for it.
I read the trial notes (part of Massad Ayoob's great book "Stand Your Ground") which covers many trials he is asked to testify in for his expertise).
Martin WAS indeed on top of fat George bashing his head into the pavement. Not an innocent Skittle consumer. Both are retards,one ended up dead.

This new case here was excessive, (quick on the draw) but yes, they are bending to public outcry Im sure. SJW pussies seem to get their way.
Curious to see what comes out of it. If innocent,more violent riot's and reasons to loot and shoot Im sure...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Powerlift66 on August 13, 2018, 11:29:19 PM
This white guy it seems, makes a habit of pulling his gun out its being reported. Like 4 other road rage incidents.
A bit of a water-head I'd imagine...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Jeffro on August 13, 2018, 11:37:10 PM
If the black dude would have just kept his cool and just walked up and asked what was going on, instead of trucking his ass, he'd still be alive.  Dude on the grounds sounds like he's a bit nutty but still, the black dude escalated the situation and lost his life for it.  Good shoot, nah probably not, but you're on the ground with someone standing over you, who knows if he's going to keep coming at you.  Shit happened quick.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: pellius on August 14, 2018, 12:28:35 AM
Over 95% of the times that a gun is used in self-defense it is only brandished. The assaulter clearly stepped back when he saw that the gun pulled. The threat to life
was over at that particular moment. The victim's life was no longer in danger. He didn't have to shoot him to save his own life. Whether he had the right is up for debate. People should think twice before they start assaulting people. The victim's past history should be a factor.

Some years back a gang of hoodlums walked into a man's property, going through a gate, and started destroying his property. Tore up his garden, smashed in his car windows and slashed his tires -- just destroying everything and anything in sight. Apparently, it was out of revenge or a warning or whatever. The man was an elderly man and walked out there with a shotgun and told them to get off his property or he will shoot them. They just laughed and ignored him. He didn't do anything. He just let them destroy his property. He would say later that because he wasn't physically threatened and they showed no indication of harming him he didn't think he had the legal right to shoot them.

So does one have the legal right to use lethal force even though your physical life is not in danger? I remember the debate going back and forth. When responding to a person who felt that the man had a right to kill the thugs, one asked should it is now a capital offense for destroying flowers and a car?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 14, 2018, 04:18:25 AM
If the black dude would have just kept his cool and just walked up and asked what was going on, instead of trucking his ass, he'd still be alive.

Haven't you heard?  Blacks aren't responsible for their actions because they are helpless victims.  They have no agency.  They are the relentless victims of relentless white racism all the time, everywhere, that explains everything.  If a white person upsets a black person they should just stand there and take the beating that is sure to ensue.  After all, white people are privileged and they have been handed everything in life.  Whites should feel bad about themselves and just let these oppressed minorities steal their property, rape their wives, and beat the ever-living fuck out of them whenever they please.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on August 25, 2019, 07:34:36 PM
I dont agree with this out of principle.  Public outcry led to this but no way on a conviction


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/13/shooter-in-fatal-florida-stand-your-ground-case-arrested-for-manslaughter.html

Found guilty and convicted of manslaughter.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/florida-michael-drejka-second-amendment-guilty-manslaughter-mcglockton
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Tennisballz on August 25, 2019, 07:51:24 PM
The publicity this case received never had anything to do with the "stand your ground" law.  It was high profile because a white man killed a black man.  The rage, anger and hatred going on on either side of this case is just further proof that diversity is a weakness not a strength.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Irongrip400 on August 26, 2019, 04:14:20 AM
The dude deserved to be in jail, he was a threat to decent society. I’m glad the jury made th right decision.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 26, 2019, 10:02:44 AM
Found guilty and convicted of manslaughter.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/florida-michael-drejka-second-amendment-guilty-manslaughter-mcglockton

Was there ever any question?
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Twaddle on August 26, 2019, 11:14:38 AM
Was there ever any question?

Yes, I think there was.  Originally, he was not charged, and the Sheriff admitted that the shooting was within the bounds of "stand your ground".  It wasn't until almost a month after the shooting, that he was arrested and charged. 

I still think he's not guilty of any crime.  If somebody attacks you, you ought to have the right to defend yourself.  Hebrews can't go around attacking people and expect there won't be consequences.  Just my 2 cents.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: hardgainerj on August 26, 2019, 02:45:30 PM
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/garland/2019/08/22/police-investigating-shooting-near-garland-intersection

would have been national news if the victim were not non-black
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Irongrip400 on August 26, 2019, 05:33:31 PM
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/garland/2019/08/22/police-investigating-shooting-near-garland-intersection

would have been national news if the victim were not non-black

Do we know? He was driving an Escalade so...
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 26, 2019, 08:10:38 PM
Yes, I think there was.  Originally, he was not charged, and the Sheriff admitted that the shooting was within the bounds of "stand your ground".  It wasn't until almost a month after the shooting, that he was arrested and charged. 

I still think he's not guilty of any crime.  If somebody attacks you, you ought to have the right to defend yourself.  Hebrews can't go around attacking people and expect there won't be consequences.  Just my 2 cents.

I agree 100% but unfortunately that isn't the world we live in anymore.  States pass stand your ground laws precisely for situations like this and yet he still gets convicted.  The fact that the guy is an asshole and the guy he shot were black shouldn't have anything to do with it............but yet it does.  the guy had every reason to believe that he could have been seriously hurt or killed.  It was clear that the attacker was hiking up his pants and posturing up as though he was ready to finish him off.  We see it every day.   Here's a recent example that we talked about where a  white dude was beaten to death after a minor car accident.  A very similar situation with a very different result.

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2019/07/24/man-beaten-death-detroit-after-car-accident/
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: hardgainerj on August 27, 2019, 09:59:05 AM
Do we know? He was driving an Escalade so...
mexican name, probably was a mexican
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: robcguns on August 27, 2019, 10:45:14 AM
I don’t care what color anyone is in this altercation.Guy who parked illegally and tosses guy to the ground gets what he gets.Should have kept his hands off the guy.Pretty Simple.You want to assault someone and they are afraid and have a gun then you might get shot.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: lightweight83 on August 27, 2019, 10:58:26 AM
About 10 years ago, a kid I went to school with got shit faced drunk and was staying at a buddies place, but he accidentally went to the house NEXT  to his buddies at like 3a.m.  Rang the door bell and banged on the door a couple times.  The home owner was a 70 year old man, who grabbed a shotgun, opened the door and shot him in the chest from point blank range, killing him.  Guess what.... the old fucker not only didn't do a single second of jail time, but he didn't even get arrested! Guess why..... BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH WHITE!
The town was in outrage, mostly because the kid never gained entry to his house and the old man pretty much went out of his way to shoot him.  Didn't call the cops until AFTER he shot him dead!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: loco on August 27, 2019, 12:37:08 PM
About 10 years ago, a kid I went to school with got shit faced drunk and was staying at a buddies place, but he accidentally went to the house NEXT  to his buddies at like 3a.m.  Rang the door bell and banged on the door a couple times.  The home owner was a 70 year old man, who grabbed a shotgun, opened the door and shot him in the chest from point blank range, killing him.  Guess what.... the old fucker not only didn't do a single second of jail time, but he didn't even get arrested! Guess why..... BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH WHITE!
The town was in outrage, mostly because the kid never gained entry to his house and the old man pretty much went out of his way to shoot him.  Didn't call the cops until AFTER he shot him dead!

Old guy must have been having a really good dream before he got woke.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: lightweight83 on August 27, 2019, 02:28:30 PM
Old guy must have been having a really good dream before he got woke.

Either that or was getting some old poon and the fucker cock blocked him!
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: hardgainerj on August 28, 2019, 08:55:33 AM
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2019/08/26/family-man-shot-killed-garland-road-rage/
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Irongrip400 on August 28, 2019, 09:49:57 AM
About 10 years ago, a kid I went to school with got shit faced drunk and was staying at a buddies place, but he accidentally went to the house NEXT  to his buddies at like 3a.m.  Rang the door bell and banged on the door a couple times.  The home owner was a 70 year old man, who grabbed a shotgun, opened the door and shot him in the chest from point blank range, killing him.  Guess what.... the old fucker not only didn't do a single second of jail time, but he didn't even get arrested! Guess why..... BECAUSE THEY WERE BOTH WHITE!
The town was in outrage, mostly because the kid never gained entry to his house and the old man pretty much went out of his way to shoot him.  Didn't call the cops until AFTER he shot him dead!

Same thing happened a few months ago with a dude I went to school with. Came in town for a BBQ pool party at a buddies. Went across the street to hang out and drink with a guy from the pool party and then about midnight came back across the stree to what he thought was the house he was staying the weekend at. Door was locked and he beat on it saying “fuck you I’ll kick your ass” thinking his buddy had locked him out. The old man came down stairs and killed him. He said he (the guy I know) jiggled the door open. Nobody at the house he was staying at knew until the next morning they all woke up and saw the cops outside and a body covered up. That’s how his wife and kids found out their dad had been killed. Fucked up shit.
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: lightweight83 on September 02, 2019, 07:24:21 AM
Same thing happened a few months ago with a dude I went to school with. Came in town for a BBQ pool party at a buddies. Went across the street to hang out and drink with a guy from the pool party and then about midnight came back across the stree to what he thought was the house he was staying the weekend at. Door was locked and he beat on it saying “fuck you I’ll kick your ass” thinking his buddy had locked him out. The old man came down stairs and killed him. He said he (the guy I know) jiggled the door open. Nobody at the house he was staying at knew until the next morning they all woke up and saw the cops outside and a body covered up. That’s how his wife and kids found out their dad had been killed. Fucked up shit.

God damn, thats brutal.  The guy you knew definitely fucked up by saying that, but I feel for his family for having to see something like that.

Was the home owner arrested or charged with anything? 
Title: Re: Trayvon Martin 2.0
Post by: Irongrip400 on September 02, 2019, 07:29:59 AM
God damn, thats brutal.  The guy you knew definitely fucked up by saying that, but I feel for his family for having to see something like that.

Was the home owner arrested or charged with anything? 

No, but I think there was possibly question as to how the guy I knew got in and what the home owner said. The doorbell recording, the homeowner shouts “he’s opening the door” but there’s some chatter amongst people if the owner actually opened it or it wasn’t locked. There was no sign of forced entry. Not saying it wasn’t stupid on the guy I knew part, it just sucks. This was about a month ago so details may still unfold.