Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: OlympiaGym on August 02, 2018, 06:08:28 PM
-
Is that remotely believable? Who ordered Kennedy killed?
-
CIA ...after Cuba, Bay of Pigs debacle
-
Not the mob?
-
Not the mob?
Some mafia involvement... but CIA was running the show
Motorcade route was altered, Mafia would not have been able to do that.... someone higher up altered the route
-
He did act alone if you mean the shooting; it's been studied to exhaustion, more than any other assassination, and no definitive proof that someone else fired at the moving car ever materialized. But, that's as far as 'his' involvement went.
All I'll say is no one looked more satisfied than Lyndon Johnson when Kennedy was laying on a medical table with half his head blown off. They really, truly hated one another.
-
Watch this
-
I don't know. Most recent articles I read:
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-i-what-happened/
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-ii-who-did-it/
-
I don't know. Most recent articles I read:
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-i-what-happened/
http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-jfk-assassination-part-ii-who-did-it/
I see your problem, so let me explain: According the study of mr Bugliosi, which is by far the most detailed study about the matter in the history of mankind, he find 153 direct evidence which point out guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing to any involvement of any other party. Then there is tons of bullshit as an "articles" written by foil hat imbeciles and complete morons, which are based at no study at all, just on rumors and bullshit.. You will believe what ever is in sync with your own prejudices, because you have to bee smart enough to see beyond them. Read that book, study the evidence which comes with it, you may learn something..
-
'Prior to the official autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital, JFK’s body was kidnapped and mutilated by top-ranking officers. His brain was scooped out and stolen. His bullet holes were butchered and enlarged.
The purpose of the ghoulish desecration of the President’s body: Obscure the fact that he had obviously been shot from the front.'
(https://assets.change.org/photos/1/ph/ae/rWphAeNAZojNvqJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1489205141)
-
Is that remotely believable? Who ordered Kennedy killed?
Harold Holt , Prime Minister of Australia 'vaporized' on Cheviot Beach in 1967 & nobody got a clue about his disappearance ???
-
'Prior to the official autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital, JFK’s body was kidnapped and mutilated by top-ranking officers. His brain was scooped out and stolen. His bullet holes were butchered and enlarged.
The purpose of the ghoulish desecration of the President’s body: Obscure the fact that he had obviously been shot from the front.'
(https://assets.change.org/photos/1/ph/ae/rWphAeNAZojNvqJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1489205141)
And you try to highlight your stupidity by using picture from the fictional movie? There is tons of real autopsy pictures, just as there is tons of evidence about the facts of this matter, but still no evidence at all that some other party than Oswald have anything to do with the assassination. Just read the book from the Bugliosi, and try to understand facts in it.
-
He did act alone if you mean the shooting; it's been studied to exhaustion, more than any other assassination, and no definitive proof that someone else fired at the moving car ever materialized. But, that's as far as 'his' involvement went.
All I'll say is no one looked more satisfied than Lyndon Johnson when Kennedy was laying on a medical table with half his head blown off. They really, truly hated one another.
Magneto was helping him as well.
-
greatest hit and clean up job of all time.
-
And you try to highlight your stupidity by using picture from the fictional movie?
::)
thats a 30 second google search into the topic.. which yielded interesting and visually impressive results, imo.
I also use renderings:
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/78/79/cb7879d2b0c9059a128e679752f93826.jpg)
-
Lol at Getbiggers trying to solve the mystery of the JFK assassination
-
Maybe if celltech had been around back then JFK would've recovered? A recent study found that more people survived gunshot wounds after taking celltech than those taking a placebo.
-
::)
thats a 30 second google search into the topic.. which yielded interesting and visually impressive results, imo.
I also use renderings:
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/78/79/cb7879d2b0c9059a128e679752f93826.jpg)
Well, who would have more idiot's perseverance than the idiot himself? Point is that this case has been clear since it happen, if we look just the facts of the matter and skip all the tin foil hat bullshit, which have no evidence at all. Book of Bugliosi is good reading just because he doesn't just throw pile of facts on you, he also explain them, and why these foil hat theories doesn't work. 1500 pages, study of all the evidence, all the testimonies, whole nine yards and then some: 153 direct evidence which point out guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing to any involvement of any other party. How hard this is to understand? This mofo used +10 years to this book, how about you? You have been digging dunghills of the internet and fishing crap from it's sewers, and you think you have gain some knowledge? Well, you haven't, it is all futile crap ;D
-
Lol at Getbiggers trying to solve the mystery of the JFK assignation
Of course! It's Getbig after all!
Getbiggers trying to solve anything and everything!
-
I see your problem, so let me explain: According the study of mr Bugliosi, which is by far the most detailed study about the matter in the history of mankind, he find 153 direct evidence which point out guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing to any involvement of any other party. Then there is tons of bullshit as an "articles" written by foil hat imbeciles and complete morons, which are based at no study at all, just on crumors and bullshit.. You will believe what ever is in sync with your own prejudices, because you have to bee smart enough to see beyond them. Read that book, study the evidence which comes with it, you may learn something..
You're the imbecile. Nowhere did I say those were my views, simply said I read them. Who made you the final arbitrer of truth? You seem to be the final expert on everything... what a retard.
-
Of course! It's Getbig after all!
Getbiggers trying to solve anything and everything!
If getbiggers can identify the 2nd thongman by the icey knoll at the Mirage then they can solve anything!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=378695.0;attach=415676;image)
-
If getbiggers can identify the 2nd thongman by the icey knoll at the Mirage then they can solve anything!
(https://www.aveleyman.com/Gallery/2017/P/13696-9760.jpg).
"Oh man, why don't you fuckin' stop it? Shit, this is too fuckin' big for you, you know that? Who did the Olympia winner, who fucked Bobby Chick's armpit, fuck man! It's a mystery! It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma! The fuckin' Weiders don't even know! Don't you get it, it's only gay if you want it to be!"
-
Imagine if hed have had tribal tattoos! The bullet would've just bounced off him!
-
didn't lying ted's father help him.. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) i remember an orange turd mentioning this...
-
I see your problem, so let me explain: According the study of mr Bugliosi, which is by far the most detailed study about the matter in the history of mankind, he find 153 direct evidence which point out guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing to any involvement of any other party. Then there is tons of bullshit as an "articles" written by foil hat imbeciles and complete morons, which are based at no study at all, just on crumors and bullshit.. You will believe what ever is in sync with your own prejudices, because you have to bee smart enough to see beyond them. Read that book, study the evidence which comes with it, you may learn something..
Good post.
-
I'll tell u how to get to the bottom of shit like this more often than not - take the 'official narrative', and believe the exact opposite, lol... that generally points toward reality.
-
(https://www.aveleyman.com/Gallery/2017/P/13696-9760.jpg).
"Oh man, why don't you fuckin' stop it? Shit, this is too fuckin' big for you, you know that? Who did the Olympia winner, who fucked Bobby Chick's armpit, fuck man! It's a mystery! It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma! The fuckin' Weiders don't even know! Don't you get it, it's only gay if you want it to be!"
HAHAHA ;D
-
Call me crazy but I do believe he acted alone.
Nobody wants to believe that a human piece of slime is able to take out the most powerful man in the world but if you really look back and analyze the weeks culminating into that tragic event, a loner loser with a decent shot was given his opportunity and he took it.
Too many complicated moving parts and lack of testimony when you start trying to rationalize other scenarios.
-
Call me crazy but I do believe he acted alone.
Nobody wants to believe that a human piece of slime is able to take out the most powerful man in the world but if you really look back and analyze the weeks culminating into that tragic event, a loner loser with a decent shot was given his opportunity and he took it.
Too many complicated moving parts and lack of testimony when you start trying to rationalize other scenarios.
That's my thought too. A Manson girl almost killed Ford, Hinckley almost got Reagan, RFK was killed by an ex horse jockey. Sometimes these guys just get lucky.
-
Lol at Getbiggers trying to solve the mystery of the JFK assassination
The grassy knoll shooter probably posts on getbig
-
The grassy knoll shooter probably posts on getbig
It's a me! MARIO!
-
::)
thats a 30 second google search into the topic.. which yielded interesting and visually impressive results, imo.
I also use renderings:
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cb/78/79/cb7879d2b0c9059a128e679752f93826.jpg)
A lot of factors go into that. He was using an old-style one-shot WWII-style rifle while the parkland shooter probably used hollow points and an AR-15 or handgun. Different blooming and impact wounds.
-
It's a me! MARIO!
Let's A GO. :D
-
A lot of factors go into that. He was using an old-style one-shot WWII-style rifle while the parkland shooter probably used hollow points and an AR-15 or handgun. Different blooming and impact wounds.
Nova on PBS here in the States did a full hour on the rifle, the bullets, and various scenarios related to the shooting -
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17pwl3 .
-
i had the video saved on my old computer... but you see JFK kneeling over in pain before the head shot... some say the driver pointed a pistol( through the seats) and shot him without it being noticeable.. look at the video..why is he kneeling over in pain and Jackie grabbing him??? then BAM!! headshot.
1
heres the best one i could find in a short notice... but i had a better view point video on my old cpu.. notice how he leans over and Jackie grabs him... he was shot in the midsection somewhere first.. or he just happened to have massive diarrhea before the head shot
-
I'll tell u how to get to the bottom of shit like this more often than not - take the 'official narrative', and believe the exact opposite, lol... that generally points toward reality.
And you will be wrong, but there isn't such force in this universe which would make you change your mind. What you are describing there is mindset of a tin foil hat moron, but if you have a brains, it would be different: You get to the bottom of this by understanding what is proved and what's not. For example, is it proved that the "official narrative" was lying? No. There is lot's of rumours and futile bullshit, but where is the evidence that they lie? "Well they have to, because no one believe what they say, and the official narrative is always lying" ? So you think that reality somehow changes depending on if you believe it or not? Reality is as it is and if you believe it or not is completely your personal problem, more specifically, a mental health problem. If you are too stupid to comprehend reality, there must be something wrong in your mind ;D
-
And you will be wrong, but there isn't such force in this universe which would make you change your mind. What you are describing there is mindset of a tin foil hat moron, but if you have a brains, it would be different: You get to the bottom of this by understanding what is proved and what's not. For example, is it proved that the "official narrative" was lying? No. There is lot's of rumours and futile bullshit, but where is the evidence that they lie? "Well they have to, because no one believe what they say, and the official narrative is always lying" ? So you think that reality somehow changes depending on if you believe it or not? Reality is as it is and if you believe it or not is completely your personal problem, more specifically, a mental health problem. If you are too stupid to comprehend reality, there must be something wrong in your mind ;D
Ropo, you are wasting your breath... logic is not the dominate force here
-
i had the video saved on my old computer... but you see JFK kneeling over in pain before the head shot... some say the driver pointed a pistol( through the seats) and shot him without it being noticeable.. look at the video..why is he kneeling over in pain and Jackie grabbing him??? then BAM!! headshot.
1
heres the best one i could find in a short notice... but i had a better view point video on my old cpu.. notice how he leans over and Jackie grabs him... he was shot in the midsection somewhere first.. or he just happened to have massive diarrhea before the head shot
Holy shit... ::)
-
Holy shit... ::)
not Shit/diarrhea bro.. shot to the midsection
-
not Shit/diarrhea bro.. shot to the midsection
People are subject to believe anything
-
logic is not the dominate force here
dang... doughboy is on the ball tonight - he just defined his entire post history lol
-
dang... doughboy is on the ball tonight - he just defined his entire post history lol
L.O.L.
-
i had the video saved on my old computer... but you see JFK kneeling over in pain before the head shot... some say the driver pointed a pistol( through the seats) and shot him without it being noticeable.. look at the video..why is he kneeling over in pain and Jackie grabbing him??? then BAM!! headshot.
1
heres the best one i could find in a short notice... but i had a better view point video on my old cpu.. notice how he leans over and Jackie grabs him... he was shot in the midsection somewhere first.. or he just happened to have massive diarrhea before the head shot
Or as it has been proved, he were shot through the neck just before the fatal shot which opens his skull. It is all in the Zapruders film, there is even frame by frame - analyse about it, so morons wouldn't have try to analyse it with their pea size brains.
Did you know that there were dozen of test shooters who were able to duplicate shots fired by Oswald? But you have read at least hundreds of times about those who didn't manage to do it, haven't you? You see, it's better news material if they cannot do it, than if they can. It sell more paper that way, but if you write that "it was easy, anyone could do it", it isn't interesting at all. One of the basic rules in this world is "it is wrong to let stupid people to keep their money", so if you write papers filled with bullshit they are eager to believe, they buy your papers and you get their money. It is simple as that.
Most of your knowledge about the matter is bullshit which the editors have wrote to sell their newspaper, and it is based on their opinion, not on facts. Why? At that time there were no other channels than news releases. When Bugliosi start his investigation for his book, he was amazed how much complete lies newspapers publish at that time, and he were able to find the roots of most of the tin foil hat claims from that pile of crap. Newspaper editor writes that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to duplicate Oswalds shots, and leave out that xx manage to do it without any problems, and 60 years later it is still a fact for imbeciles, no matter if the truth has been all this time in the official report. But who reads the official report, when it has been claimed to be full of lies? Claimed by the newspaper editors, who sell lies to the simple people to get their money.
Just like the moronic theory where the driver turns around and in milliseconds take a shot to JFK:s forehead. Shot which is complete unnoticeable by the 5 passengers, by that second agent at the front seat, by all those dozens of agents and policemen running towards the car. They have to invent the invisible gun and completely silent cartridge, and that agent have to train weeks and weeks to throw the shot in that time frame, but it has to be true because you read it from the internet? Fuck the facts and reality, driver turns around and shoot and he is so fucking fast that no one doesn't see him to do it, no one see the gun or it's muzzle flash, no one hear that 120 dB sound of gunshot, because they all are complete morons...or it is just another piece of bullshit? It was in the papers that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to make those shots = Oswald didn't shoot = fatal shot need some kind of explanation = let just use our imagination and make up some moronic theory ;D
-
Or as it has been proved, he were shot through the neck just before the fatal shot which opens his skull. It is all in the Zapruders film, there is even frame by frame - analyse about it, so morons wouldn't have try to analyse it with their pea size brains.
Did you know that there were dozen of test shooters who were able to duplicate shots fired by Oswald? But you have read at least hundreds of times about those who didn't manage to do it, haven't you? You see, it's better news material if they cannot do it, than if they can. It sell more paper that way, but if you write that "it was easy, anyone could do it", it isn't interesting at all. One of the basic rules in this world is "it is wrong to let stupid people to keep their money", so if you write papers filled with bullshit they are eager to believe, they buy your papers and you get their money. It is simple as that.
Most of your knowledge about the matter is bullshit which the editors have wrote to sell their newspaper, and it is based on their opinion, not on facts. Why? At that time there were no other channels than news releases. When Bugliosi start his investigation for his book, he was amazed how much complete lies newspapers publish at that time, and he were able to find the roots of most of the tin foil hat claims from that pile of crap. Newspaper editor writes that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to duplicate Oswalds shots, and leave out that xx manage to do it without any problems, and 60 years later it is still a fact for imbeciles, no matter if the truth has been all this time in the official report. But who reads the official report, when it has been claimed to be full of lies? Claimed by the newspaper editors, who sell lies to the simple people to get their money.
Just like the moronic theory where the driver turns around and in milliseconds take a shot to JFK:s forehead. Shot which is complete unnoticeable by the 5 passengers, by that second agent at the front seat, by all those dozens of agents and policemen running towards the car. They have to invent the invisible gun and completely silent cartridge, and that agent have to train weeks and weeks to throw the shot in that time frame, but it has to be true because you read it from the internet? Fuck the facts and reality, driver turns around and shoot and he is so fucking fast that no one doesn't see him to do it, no one see the gun or it's muzzle flash, no one hear that 120 dB sound of gunshot, because they all are complete morons...or it is just another piece of bullshit? It was in the papers that xx FBI sharpshooters didn't manage to make those shots = Oswald didn't shoot = fatal shot need some kind of explanation = let just use our imagination and make up some moronic theory ;D
interesting... thanks for the feedback.. I've just now became interested in the JFK assassination.. like i said.. I've read "they say" so I'm still researching on it.. I've became intrigued lately.. thanks for the info and any sources you can produce id appreciate it. thanks...are their any good reads you can recommend.. alot of stuff online seems to be based on opinion. when i do read something that grabs my attention i research the author and he/she writes BS stuff in the past and looses their credibility... my father was always hardcore into the JFK thing, because it was his generation. I've became intrigued on it the past 2 months.. ill see him here in a few months and ill pick his brain... he is an encyclopedia of knowledge when it comes to that... if there are any books you can recommend id appreciate it. thx
-
dang... doughboy is on the ball tonight - he just defined his entire post history lol
doughboy.... who is doughboy? im lost...thanks
-
doughboy.... who is doughboy? im lost...thanks
Me too
-
doughboy.... who is doughboy? im lost...thanks
perhaps the guy that I quoted.
-
Call me crazy but I do believe he acted alone.
Nobody wants to believe that a human piece of slime is able to take out the most powerful man in the world but if you really look back and analyze the weeks culminating into that tragic event, a loner loser with a decent shot was given his opportunity and he took it.
Too many complicated moving parts and lack of testimony when you start trying to rationalize other scenarios.
Was he a good shot? Not that easy to shoot a moving target like that and have it all planned in advance. This was an inside job imo.
http://www.plaintruth.com/the_plain_truth/2013/11/jfk-how-good-of-a-shot-was-oswald.html
Former Marines recall that Oswald was a poor shot. Nelson Delgado said Oswald on the firing line was “a pretty big joke” because he got a lot of complete misses. Delgado told researcher Mark Lane that Oswald just was not that interested in guns. He was always being penalized for not taking proper care of his rifle or cleaning it regularly.
Sherman Cooley, another Marine, said “If I had to pick one man in the entire United States to shoot me, I’d pick Oswald. I saw the man shoot. There’s no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of doing in Dallas.”
-
And you will be wrong, but there isn't such force in this universe which would make you change your mind. What you are describing there is mindset of a tin foil hat moron, but if you have a brains, it would be different: You get to the bottom of this by understanding what is proved and what's not. For example, is it proved that the "official narrative" was lying? No. There is lot's of rumours and futile bullshit, but where is the evidence that they lie? "Well they have to, because no one believe what they say, and the official narrative is always lying" ? So you think that reality somehow changes depending on if you believe it or not? Reality is as it is and if you believe it or not is completely your personal problem, more specifically, a mental health problem. If you are too stupid to comprehend reality, there must be something wrong in your mind ;D
Jesus Christ you are a fucking moron ropooo! Holy shit. You just gobble up everything the powers that be tell you. Were you born such a fucking idiot? You useless old sack of shit!
-
Was he a good shot? Not that easy to shoot a moving target like that and have it all planned in advance. This was an inside job imo.
http://www.plaintruth.com/the_plain_truth/2013/11/jfk-how-good-of-a-shot-was-oswald.html
Former Marines recall that Oswald was a poor shot. Nelson Delgado said Oswald on the firing line was “a pretty big joke” because he got a lot of complete misses. Delgado told researcher Mark Lane that Oswald just was not that interested in guns. He was always being penalized for not taking proper care of his rifle or cleaning it regularly.
Sherman Cooley, another Marine, said “If I had to pick one man in the entire United States to shoot me, I’d pick Oswald. I saw the man shoot. There’s no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of doing in Dallas.”
The Marines - as Mike mentioned - had three qualifications for rifle proficiency: Marksman (190 to 209 points), Sharpshooter (210 to 219 points) and Expert (220 to 250 points). In December of 1956, Oswald scored 212 points on a test...two points over the "Sharpshooter" minimum and eight points short of "expert." In earning that score, he hit 48 of 50, then 49 of 50, in shots taken at a target 200 yards away. Later, in 1959, he qualified as a "Marksman."
-
Jesus Christ you are a fucking moron ropooo! Holy shit. You just gobble up everything the powers that be tell you. Were you born such a fucking idiot? You useless old sack of shit!
Why so angry? Did I shake your beliefs? Why your tactic is always same, you are screaming like an ape and throwing shit, like you don't have any other way to react? Stop yelling, just pick any claim presented in the official report, and prove it to be wrong..Why I know already that this will never happen? Just because I know what kind of incompetent moron you are ;D
-
The Marines - as Mike mentioned - had three qualifications for rifle proficiency: Marksman (190 to 209 points), Sharpshooter (210 to 219 points) and Expert (220 to 250 points). In December of 1956, Oswald scored 212 points on a test...two points over the "Sharpshooter" minimum and eight points short of "expert." In earning that score, he hit 48 of 50, then 49 of 50, in shots taken at a target 200 yards away. Later, in 1959, he qualified as a "Marksman."
Quite true. But if you need to sell bullshit to the simple folks, you can write that he was poor shooter, so because of that it would be impossible that he act alone, so there must be somekind of sinister conspiracy, which happens to sell newspapers for years and decades. And fact is that they have made billions of dollars by writing the books and crap about the matter, so Oswald has made some millionaires by this assassination.
-
Quite true. But if you need to sell bullshit to the simple folks, you can write that he was poor shooter, so because of that it would be impossible that he act alone, so there must be somekind of sinister conspiracy, which happens to sell newspapers for years and decades. And fact is that they have made billions of dollars by writing the books and crap about the matter, so Oswald has made some millionaires by this assassination.
so what books do you recommend? or is this all on theory/personal opinion...im tired of these "opinion" reads... i just want to read the facts. im a history buff and id like to read all sides of the story. not attacking you bro
-
so what books do you recommend? or is this all on theory/personal opinion...im tired of these "opinion" reads... i just want to read the facts. im a history buff and id like to read all sides of the story. not attacking you bro
Just read that "Reclaiming history" by Vincent Bugliosi, and there is all you need. This guy spend 21 years to studying the case and the evidence, so he has think it over little bit more thoroughly than most of the people.. Difference between him and other authors who has wrote about the matter is that he was a famous prosecutor, one of the best jurist in the USA, and multi millionaire before he start writing. His motivation was facts, he already have wealth..
-
Just read that "Reclaiming history" by Vincent Bugliosi, and there is all you need. This guy spend 21 years to studying the case and the evidence, so he has think it over little bit more thoroughly than most of the people.. Difference between him and other authors who has wrote about the matter is that he was a famous prosecutor, one of the best jurist in the USA, and multi millionaire before he start writing. His motivation was facts, he already have wealth..
will do bro.. whether i agree with it or not i like to read... id rather read history then watch fake TV..i will purchase it, if it grabs my attention i wont put it down.....do you think the CIA had any implications with the assassination? im new to the JFK so id like to hear all points of view.
-
will do bro.. whether i agree with it or not i like to read... id rather read history then watch fake TV..i will purchase it, if it grabs my attention i wont put it down.....do you think the CIA had any implications with the assassination? im new to the JFK so id like to hear all points of view.
Read the book, and then think your viewpoints again, if you need. I don't think you need, it explains every point of view quite completely..
-
Was he a good shot? Not that easy to shoot a moving target like that and have it all planned in advance. This was an inside job imo.
http://www.plaintruth.com/the_plain_truth/2013/11/jfk-how-good-of-a-shot-was-oswald.html
Former Marines recall that Oswald was a poor shot. Nelson Delgado said Oswald on the firing line was “a pretty big joke” because he got a lot of complete misses. Delgado told researcher Mark Lane that Oswald just was not that interested in guns. He was always being penalized for not taking proper care of his rifle or cleaning it regularly.
Sherman Cooley, another Marine, said “If I had to pick one man in the entire United States to shoot me, I’d pick Oswald. I saw the man shoot. There’s no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of doing in Dallas.”
I've been to Dealey Plaza and seen the 6th floor window. It really isn't that far.
He had just started that job at the Texas Book Depository a few weeks prior and the President's route was announced in the newspaper.
At that point, Kennedy's life was in grave danger.
We already know that the rifle was being stashed at Ruth Paine's house and there is testimony to Oswald carrying the weapon(he claimed it to be 'curtain rods') that very morning.
Were the circumstances a little crazy? Yeah, but that's life. We have all seen crazy circumstances in our own lives.
Was Oswald good enough with a rifle to make that shot in 3 attempts. Yeah 100%.
-
We'll never really know about Oswald because Ruby killed him so quickly. Who sent Ruby? And then Ruby dies a few short years of previously undiagnosed cancer throughout his body? It's not suspicious that the man who supposedly acted alone never gets to tell his story because someone with nothing to gain by it goes on a virtual suicide mission to kill him?
-
If getbiggers can identify the 2nd thongman by the icey knoll at the Mirage then they can solve anything!
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=378695.0;attach=415676;image)
LMAO
;D ;D
-
(https://www.aveleyman.com/Gallery/2017/P/13696-9760.jpg).
"Oh man, why don't you fuckin' stop it? Shit, this is too fuckin' big for you, you know that? Who did the Olympia winner, who fucked Bobby Chick's armpit, fuck man! It's a mystery! It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma! The fuckin' Weiders don't even know! Don't you get it, it's only gay if you want it to be!"
Awesome!
-
We'll never really know about Oswald because Ruby killed him so quickly. Who sent Ruby? And then Ruby dies a few short years of previously undiagnosed cancer throughout his body? It's not suspicious that the man who supposedly acted alone never gets to tell his story because someone with nothing to gain by it goes on a virtual suicide mission to kill him?
And what you are really saying is "we'll never really know because we believe lies of the press and complete morons". Truth about the matter has been known and obvious since it happen, and Warren Commission give their report. Now concentrate and read slowly so you really understand this: Warren Commission report has all the facts just right, and in the past 50 years there has been 0 evidence about any involvement of any other person, party etc. other than Oswald. Did you understand what you just read? So if you decide that you believe claims and unproved bullshit rather than proved facts, it is your personal problem. Facts remains same, there is just one more blockhead who chooses bullshit over reality. It really is just simple as that. Just ask from yourself, what is the evidence which make you to believe, that Oswald didn't do this alone?
-
And what you are really saying is "we'll never really know because we believe lies of the press and complete morons". Truth about the matter has been known and obvious since it happen, and Warren Commission give their report. Now concentrate and read slowly so you really understand this: Warren Commission report has all the facts just right, and in the past 50 years there has been 0 evidence about any involvement of any other person, party etc. other than Oswald. Did you understand what you just read? So if you decide that you believe claims and unproved bullshit rather than proved facts, it is your personal problem. Facts remains same, there is just one more blockhead who chooses bullshit over reality. It really is just simple as that. Just ask from yourself, what is the evidence which make you to believe, that Oswald didn't do this alone?
I don't know but I will be quitting my job at the end of October and plan to take up the study of the assasination full-time at that point.
-
I don't know but I will be quitting my job at the end of October and plan to take up the study of the assasination full-time at that point.
;D
Legit LOL!
-
-
And then a mandatory tin foil hat - video, where known loonie and an author, Jerry Kroth, is selling his new book to the simple people. It is so obvious that the most real information about the facts of the matter will come from the guy who wrote about the UFOs and meetings with aliens. I mean what is the point of all this? "We already have an opinion from all the people, so why don't we ask what village idiot thinks about the case?" ;D
-
George Herbert Walker Bush is the man behind the JFK assasination and the attempt on Reagan. It was conceived on the property of the Duke of Duval County, Archie Parr’s property and yes, Oswald was there as an application to kopy radio station in Alice, TX proves.
-
George Herbert Walker Bush is the man behind the JFK assasination and the attempt on Reagan. It was conceived on the property of the Duke of Duval County, Archie Parr’s property and yes, Oswald was there as an application to kopy radio station in Alice, TX proves.
Proof?
-
Proof?
with almost 18K posts here you would think you would know statements on Getbig don't require proof.
-
Proof?
https://www.google.com/amp/www.alicetx.com/article/20131122/news/311229916%3ftemplate=ampart
-
The redacted declassified files are still worth a look see
-
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release
-
https://www.google.com/amp/www.alicetx.com/article/20131122/news/311229916%3ftemplate=ampart
So this whole article just questions whether LHO was in Alice Texas a month before the shooting.
-
https://www.google.com/amp/www.alicetx.com/article/20131122/news/311229916%3ftemplate=ampart
Why don't you put it into your own words and let's have a conversation?
Hash it out right in front of everybody.
This body of men are intent on taking out the most powerful man in the world and they send Lee Harvey Oswald of all people to carry it out?
I would love to have a detailed one on one discussion with anybody concerning this nonsense so we can put it to rest.
-
Why don't you put it into your own words and let's have a conversation?
Hash it out right in front of everybody.
This body of men are intent on taking out the most powerful man in the world and they send Lee Harvey Oswald of all people to carry it out?
I would love to have a detailed one on one discussion with anybody concerning this nonsense so we can put it to rest.
In my own words, HW Bush is responsible. Oswald is the fall guy. There was a team of HW’s CIA that came from Cuba that actually carried this out. The one glaring detail you can really lift from the declassified tiles is that there was CLEARLY more than one shooter. What I feel that I have solid evidence of, is that it was conceived by HW and since that day, the Presidency has been a Bush dynasty......that is, until now.
-
In my own words, HW Bush is responsible. Oswald is the fall guy. There was a team of HW’s CIA that came from Cuba that actually carried this out. The one glaring detail you can really lift from the declassified tiles is that there was CLEARLY more than one shooter. What I feel that I have solid evidence of, is that it was conceived by HW and since that day, the Presidency has been a Bush dynasty......that is, until now.
The pieces just do not fit together my man.
Oswald had only been working at the Texas Schoolbook Depository for a few short weeks before the assassination even took place.
The route wasn't even announced in the local newspaper until 4 or 5 days prior.
Ruth Paine was actually the person who landed him the job when he basically had zero prospects. Was this school teacher from Irving, Texas a government agent too??
The single gunman theory fits together perfectly and is backed with video evidence.
The car takes a left onto Elm street. The first shot rings around Zapruder film frame 170. Rosemary Willis stops and looks back at the Depository.
Oswald misses and reloads quickly. Fires again clearly hitting JFK and Governor Connelly right around frame 226.
Cocks again, takes a little more time and lands the kill shot at frame 313.
It's all right there in front of us.
-
The pieces just do not fit together my man.
Oswald had only been working at the Texas Schoolbook Depository for a few short weeks before the assassination even took place.
The route wasn't even announced in the local newspaper until 4 or 5 days prior.
Ruth Paine was actually the person who landed him the job when he basically had zero prospects. Was this school teacher from Irving, Texas a government agent too??
The single gunman theory fits together perfectly and is backed with video evidence.
The car takes a left onto Elm street. The first shot rings around Zapruder film frame 170. Rosemary Willis stops and looks back at the Depository.
Oswald misses and reloads quickly. Fires again clearly hitting JFK and Governor Connelly right around frame 226.
Cocks again, takes a little more time and lands the kill shot at frame 313.
It's all right there in front of us.
Are these YouTube links the source of your opinion?
-
We'll never really know about Oswald because Ruby killed him so quickly. Who sent Ruby? And then Ruby dies a few short years of previously undiagnosed cancer throughout his body? It's not suspicious that the man who supposedly acted alone never gets to tell his story because someone with nothing to gain by it goes on a virtual suicide mission to kill him?
You're onto something. There is strong evidence that indicates the assassination of JFK, RFK, was hoaxed by the shadow govt. Hoaxed as in they were never assassinated, hoaxed like several things related to the 9/11 false flag. And the Charles Manson case where he, Tex Watson, Sharon Tate, allegedly conspired to murder seven people - strong evidence indicates that too was a psyop done by the shadow govt.