Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT on September 24, 2018, 06:49:49 AM

Title: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT on September 24, 2018, 06:49:49 AM
Yes....1989 and IMO way more impressive than our new Mr. Olympia Shawn Rhoden. Rhoden looks good, but seriously guys....look at Pearsons condition and size in this video. His back is fucking nuts. How is it that Pearsons condition in 89 was the norm and now the O winners have no graininess. Just smooth and lean. Sad.

Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: kevin25 on September 24, 2018, 09:40:24 AM
A lot of guys from the 80s and the 90s could have won the Mr. O this year. Backward progress 😕
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: njflex on September 24, 2018, 09:44:39 AM
I AGREE,BUT RHODEN HAS BIGGER LEGS  BY FAR,AND THICKER,,PEARSON WAS GREAT AND EVEN HIS WBF DAYS BOTH SHOWS HE LOOKED GOOD IN..'THE JET MAN'
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: Dan-O on September 24, 2018, 10:12:21 AM
I was always a fan of Tony Pearson's physique.  Just amazing structure and lines, and crazy detail.  And Buchanan-esque V-taper.

Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: G_Thang on September 24, 2018, 10:44:14 AM
Physique isn't even balanced with those toothpick legs.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: Dan-O on September 24, 2018, 11:06:26 AM
Physique isn't even balanced with those toothpick legs.

You're absolutely right.  Nowadays he could have just injected some SEO's into his calves, vastus lateralis, etc., then he'd fit right in with the cookie-cutter pros of today.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: delta9mda on September 24, 2018, 04:42:36 PM
This Toney......
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: falco on September 25, 2018, 04:39:42 AM
Insulin killed Bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: pellius on September 25, 2018, 05:11:12 AM
Physique isn't even balanced with those toothpick legs.

Seems like a lot of guys from that era had trouble building big quads. But nowadays seems like everyone is waddling around with huge quads. Seems like the quads and delts are the muscle groups that have gotten insanely huge compared to the old days.

Oil will work in the delts but not in a large muscle group like the quads.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: drmarkp on September 25, 2018, 07:43:24 PM
I was always a fan of Tony Pearson's physique.  Just amazing structure and lines, and crazy detail.  And Buchanan-esque V-taper.





The 80's .. Click the You Tube link above
Mercury Morris Claiborne
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: Dan-O on September 25, 2018, 08:13:29 PM


The 80's .. Click the You Tube link above
Mercury Morris Claiborne

I remember him.  Took 1st place bantamweight at the 1989 Nationals, and 2nd at the world amateurs.  Sick conditioning.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: IRON CROSS on September 26, 2018, 12:21:09 AM
Insulin killed Bodybuilding.

body builders kill bodybuilding  :(
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: falco on September 26, 2018, 05:15:44 AM
Insulin saved diabetics.
Title: Re: Tony Pearson 1989.....more impressive than Rhoden
Post by: Danimal77 on September 28, 2018, 04:26:27 PM
Yes....1989 and IMO way more impressive than our new Mr. Olympia Shawn Rhoden. Rhoden looks good, but seriously guys....look at Pearsons condition and size in this video. His back is fucking nuts. How is it that Pearsons condition in 89 was the norm and now the O winners have no graininess. Just smooth and lean. Sad.



Any guy who placed in the top 15 up until the early 2000's would place higher than Rhoden did this year.