Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Board_SHERIF on October 11, 2018, 08:17:21 AM
-
-
A body language expert, Dr. Lillian Glass, explains Ford’s manipulative use of baby-like voice intonations and her evasive facial movements to explain the deceitful nature of her testimony.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips (https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips)
-
A body language expert, Dr. Lillian Glass, explains Ford’s manipulative use of baby-like voice intonations and her evasive facial movements to explain the deceitful nature of her testimony.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips (https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips)
And people say she was credible? I think not.
-
Goo-goo, ga-ga, me no remember...Kavanaugh bad man...wah...wah!!!
Ridiculous.
-
A body language expert, Dr. Lillian Glass, explains Ford’s manipulative use of baby-like voice intonations and her evasive facial movements to explain the deceitful nature of her testimony.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips (https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips)
If 20 body language 'experts' were interviewed, there would be twenty interpretations of Christine Blasey Ford's body language during that hearing. Body language analyzation is a pseudoscience and therefore not necessarily accurate. It is fascinating and a useful assessment tool in many situations, such as job interviews. Body language can also be faked and often is.
Dr. Lillian Glass is an interesting person who leads a rather public and varied life. https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/ (https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/)
-
If 20 body language 'experts' were interviewed, there would be twenty interpretations of Christine Blasey Ford's body language during that hearing. Body language analyzation is a pseudoscience and therefore not necessarily accurate. It is fascinating and a useful assessment tool in many situations, such as job interviews. Body language can also be faked and often is.
Dr. Lillian Glass is an interesting person who leads a rather public and varied life. https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/ (https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/)
I disagree. I trust her credentials and she sounds credible. Why would she be wrong? She's studied this her whole life. I believe what she has to say about Christine Ford.
#BelieveLillianGlass
See how that works? ;)
-
I disagree. I trust her credentials and she sounds credible. Why would she be wrong? She's studied this her whole life. I believe what she has to say about Christine Ford.
#BelieveLillianGlass
See how that works? ;)
Yes I do. You are welcome to believe what you choose, as are we all. Just because we accept something doesn't make it right or true.
-
Yes I do. You are welcome to believe what you choose, as are we all. Just because we accept something doesn't make it right or true.
So why did the Senate's majority not believing Christine Ford lead to a riot outside the Supreme Court and the harassment of politicians in the halls of Congress if we're all allowed to have our opinions? Doesn't seem in the spirit of tolerance and fair-play and free thought to me.
-
If 20 body language 'experts' were interviewed, there would be twenty interpretations of Christine Blasey Ford's body language during that hearing. Body language analyzation is a pseudoscience and therefore not necessarily accurate. It is fascinating and a useful assessment tool in many situations, such as job interviews. Body language can also be faked and often is.
Dr. Lillian Glass is an interesting person who leads a rather public and varied life. https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/ (https://www.drlillianglass.com/body-language-blog/)
Do you disagree with her assessment? Sounded logical to me.
-
And people say she was credible? I think not.
yep, people like most of the talking heads on Faux News and a few people in the White House
-
yep, people like most of the talking heads on Faux News and a few people in the White House
If Raped would you not remember what year it happened ?? ::)
-
Do you disagree with her assessment? Sounded logical to me.
I neither agree nor disagree with her assessments. A couple of things she said bothered me. Without knowing what Ford's usual voice sounds like, it is not possible to know if she always sounds the same. Some people's normal speaking style sounds like "baby talk." IMO she was not tilting her head, she was looking directly at the attorney as opposed to the camera. What seemed the most out of line was when she commented on Ford's lack of memory about certain things. This had nothing to do with interpreting Ford's body language.
-
I neither agree nor disagree with her assessments. A couple of things she said bothered me. Without knowing what Ford's usual voice sounds like, it is not possible to know if she always sounds the same. Some people's normal speaking style sounds like "baby talk." IMO she was not tilting her head, she was looking directly at the attorney as opposed to the camera. What seemed the most out of line was when she commented on Ford's lack of memory about certain things. This had nothing to do with interpreting Ford's body language.
Then you didn't watch the hearings.
-
If Raped would you not remember what year it happened ?? ::)
I certainly would, as would most rape victims.
She couldn't remember:
1) The year
2) The house's address or where it happened in that house in terms of the bedroom's location
3) The neighorhood
4) How she got there or how she left
5) She claimed she called her friend on her cell phone (they didn't exist)
6) Any corroborating witnesses (or I should say, the one she provided couldn't validate her claim)
7) Any personally identifiable information about her alleged attacker
In short, she did the equivalent of what an Internet troll threatening to fight someone else on the Internet would do: Making a threat, asking for an address, demanding a free planet ticket, a mutually agreeable venue, and to top it off providing no personally identifiable information or a photo. And should these impossible demands be met, conveniently they'll claim the time or date no longer works for them, they're not available anymore, that the other person will only flake out and not show up anyway, that the other person should travel to them instead, that they don't want to get accused of assault by the law, etc etc. Liars do what liars do - they raise the bar whenever you call their bluff. She wanted an FBI investigation and she got one. It couldn't convince a female senator and two fence-sitting male senators who are no friends of Trump. It's over. He's confirmed. GET OVER IT ALREADY.
-
Then you didn't watch the hearings.
I did, in fact, watch them. Not too sure a screen shot tells much of a story. If they do, Trump's completely deranged based on his.
(https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5bbfc4ca2c734e2cee06ad15/master/w_1298,c_limit/Cassidy-Trump-Fed-Comments.jpg)
(https://media.wired.com/photos/5b8f13e53667562d3024c35f/master/w_1895,c_limit/Trump-TweetWar-1024542414-2w.jpg)
(https://cached.imagescaler.hbpl.co.uk/resize/scaleWidth/614/cached.offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk/news/ORP/trump2-20151209102154710.jpg)
-
What you're doing is what-about-ism. This thread is about Ford and her voice and body language, not the President. Again, all you do is deflect, which underscores the emptiness of your arguments.
-
What you're doing is what-about-ism. This thread is about Ford and her voice and body language, not the President. Again, all you do is deflect, which underscores the emptiness of your arguments.
Fine.
(https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-hearing-6.jpg?quality=85)
(https://truthfeednews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ford-cry-01-800x416.jpg)
Christine's voice is not an act. I is how she sounds when she speaks.
-
Every expert that has studied her testimony disagrees, and since they have experience in this pseudo-scientific field that likely outlevels yours, I'm going to go with their conclusions rather than your assessment. :)
-
Every expert that has studied her testimony disagrees, and since they have experience in this pseudo-scientific field that likely outlevels yours, I'm going to go with their conclusions rather than your assessment. :)
How many experts is that? Disagrees with what, how she sounds when she speaks? I'd have to see these "experts" credentials as compared to mine. If that's not her usual voice, prove it.
-
How many experts is that? Disagrees with what, how she sounds when she speaks? I'd have to see these "experts" credentials as compared to mine.
I've found five so far. How many would satisfy you? The answer's none, because this is a bait & hook liberals pull every day. Keep demanding more evidence until you exhaust all proof provided and claim it's still insufficient. Alternatively, ask 500 people until 1 disagrees with the other 499. We saw it last month with them demanding an FBI report then dismissing it a day after it was released because it didn't meet their expectations or validate their conclusions.
If that's not her usual voice, prove it.
I don't have to prove anything. As long as I say it's true, then it's true, remember? That's what you guys said about Dr. Ford's testimony. ;)
-
I've found five so far. How many would satisfy you? The answer's none, because this is a bait & hook liberals pull every day. Keep demanding more evidence until you exhaust all proof provided and claim it's still insufficient. Alternatively, ask 500 people until 1 disagrees with the other 499. We saw it last month with them demanding an FBI report then dismissing it a day after it was released because it didn't meet their expectations or validate their conclusions.
I don't have to prove anything. As long as I say it's true, then it's true, remember? That's what you guys said about Dr. Ford's testimony. ;)
Likewise, as long as I say something is true, then it is true. You don't have to prove anything because you can't.
You guys? I looked around and there's just me responding to you.
-
Likewise, as long as I say something is true, then it is true. You don't have to prove anything because you can't.
You're finally getting it. Hallelujah. The Christine Ford saga can now come to a (merciful) end, now that you understand the premise of her testimony last month.
You guys? I looked around and there's just me responding to you.
Liberals, you dumb fuck.
-
You're finally getting it. Hallelujah. The Christine Ford saga can now come to a (merciful) end, now that you understand the premise of her testimony last month.
Liberals, you dumb fuck.
Yes hallelujah. Too bad the saga isn't actually ended just morphed into something new. Note that I never wavered from the concept of innocent until proven guilty as applies to Kavanaugh and Ford. "He said - she said" is all there is at this point.
Who nominated me spokesperson for liberals? Sorry, but I decline.
-
Yes hallelujah. Too bad the saga isn't actually ended just morphed into something new. Note that I never wavered from the concept of innocent until proven guilty as applies to Kavanaugh and Ford. "He said - she said" is all there is at this point.
Who nominated me spokesperson for liberals? Sorry, but I decline.
You're all the same. And you're welcome to lump me in with Republicans, but they're a fine crowd and I love their company.
-
You're all the same. And you're welcome to lump me in with Republicans, but they're a fine crowd and I love their company.
Stereotyping. -Not sure all Republicans would accept you into their herd.
-
Stereotyping. -Not sure all Republicans would accept you into their herd.
That's fine. As long as they vote for Republican candidates and this President, they're fine with me, bedfellows or not.
-
That's fine. As long as they vote for Republican candidates and this President, they're fine with me, bedfellows or not.
Are you saying all Republican candidates?
-
Are you saying all Republican candidates?
No, clearly I'm only referring to Republican candidates with really stylish shoes.
-
I certainly would, as would most rape victims.
She couldn't remember:
1) The year
2) The house's address or where it happened in that house in terms of the bedroom's location
3) The neighorhood
4) How she got there or how she left
5) She claimed she called her friend on her cell phone (they didn't exist)
6) Any corroborating witnesses (or I should say, the one she provided couldn't validate her claim)
7) Any personally identifiable information about her alleged attacker
In short, she did the equivalent of what an Internet troll threatening to fight someone else on the Internet would do: Making a threat, asking for an address, demanding a free planet ticket, a mutually agreeable venue, and to top it off providing no personally identifiable information or a photo. And should these impossible demands be met, conveniently they'll claim the time or date no longer works for them, they're not available anymore, that the other person will only flake out and not show up anyway, that the other person should travel to them instead, that they don't want to get accused of assault by the law, etc etc. Liars do what liars do - they raise the bar whenever you call their bluff. She wanted an FBI investigation and she got one. It couldn't convince a female senator and two fence-sitting male senators who are no friends of Trump. It's over. He's confirmed. GET OVER IT ALREADY.
The Democrats learned from Anita Hill not to give specifics because they could be proven wrong. This time around everything was vague so it couldn't be disproven so the libs could use the "where there's smoke there's fire" argument. Remember the 3rd accuser met with dems for 6 days before she was sure it was Kavanaugh. Had she been questioned everything would have been vague as well. It is a great thing this was defeated or we would see the same thing with every nomination or even election.
The Republicans must not only fight back but should start suing for these smears to make people think twice before spreading false accusations. Ford was just a dem hack and has been an active anti Trumper for the last 2 years. They should go after her in a civil court and expose her for what she really is but I know they won't.
-
No, clearly I'm only referring to Republican candidates with really stylish shoes.
Good for them. Stylish shoes are a must. ;D
-
A body language expert, Dr. Lillian Glass, explains Ford’s manipulative use of baby-like voice intonations and her evasive facial movements to explain the deceitful nature of her testimony.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips (https://video.foxnews.com/v/5844100372001/?#sp=show-clips)
Spot on analysis
That lying bitch also has an atrocious memory recall
Can’t remember this can’t remember that ::)
Pitiful excuses.
And still there are those Believing & Defending her on here.
-
Spot on analysis
That lying bitch also has an atrocious memory recall
Can’t remember this can’t remember that ::)
Pitiful excuses.
And still there are those Believing & Defending her on here.
Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath about a few things.
"But what IS cause for concern is his deception as related to the terms he wrote in his yearbook as you will see below. Having never heard any of these terms before, I looked them up after his testimony and found the following:
BOOFING -according to the urban dictionary means putting alcohol or drugs in your anus ( rectum) for a bigger high. He said it meant farting.
FFFFF- According to the Urban Dictionary means a way to avoid saying the 4 letter F-word by simply drawing out the F word. he said it related to a person he knew who stuttered, If that is true, that alone shows bad character to make fun of someone who stuttered. It shows someone who bullied and made fun of a speech impaired individual.
But the fact that he put FFFF in front of Renate Alumnus shows that he may be referring to having sex with Renate and letting everyone know about it in his yearbook in a public manner. That is called Slut Shaming . Below is Renate’s the girl he slut shamed’s comment.
RENATE ALUMNUS is an actual person named Renate Dolphin who issued the following quote
“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”
So here, Kavanaugh slut-shamed this young girl at the time in high school. In his testimony, he said it was a friend. She thought nothing of it until she learned the true meaning of the term as you just read. With a friend like that you don’t need enemies.
DEVILS TRIANGLE– according to the urban dictionary this term means “a threesome with 1 woman and 2 men. It is important to remember that straight men do not make eye contact while in the act. Doing so will question their sexuality. “
Kavanaugh said it was a drinking game. Was Mark Judge part of that threesome and is that why he does not want to testify under penalty of perjury?
However, he LIED about the terms he used to the committee. And after researching what they actually mean this is inexcusable. He did laugh them off during his testimony and made light of them as Gold Triangle being a drinking game and Rente Alumnus being a friend and boofing being farting. That showed embarrassment on his part as he minimized these teenage entries into his yearbook, which didn’t raise any red flags at the time. But now there is great cause for concern.
But no matter what they find in terms of whether he did or didn’t molest or rape any women, one thing that if he lied to the committee about the definition of the terms and that is cause for concern."
Spot on analysis
-
Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath about a few things.
"But what IS cause for concern is his deception as related to the terms he wrote in his yearbook as you will see below. Having never heard any of these terms before, I looked them up after his testimony and found the following:
BOOFING -according to the urban dictionary means putting alcohol or drugs in your anus ( rectum) for a bigger high. He said it meant farting.
FFFFF- According to the Urban Dictionary means a way to avoid saying the 4 letter F-word by simply drawing out the F word. he said it related to a person he knew who stuttered, If that is true, that alone shows bad character to make fun of someone who stuttered. It shows someone who bullied and made fun of a speech impaired individual.
But the fact that he put FFFF in front of Renate Alumnus shows that he may be referring to having sex with Renate and letting everyone know about it in his yearbook in a public manner. That is called Slut Shaming . Below is Renate’s the girl he slut shamed’s comment.
RENATE ALUMNUS is an actual person named Renate Dolphin who issued the following quote
“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”
So here, Kavanaugh slut-shamed this young girl at the time in high school. In his testimony, he said it was a friend. She thought nothing of it until she learned the true meaning of the term as you just read. With a friend like that you don’t need enemies.
DEVILS TRIANGLE– according to the urban dictionary this term means “a threesome with 1 woman and 2 men. It is important to remember that straight men do not make eye contact while in the act. Doing so will question their sexuality. “
Kavanaugh said it was a drinking game. Was Mark Judge part of that threesome and is that why he does not want to testify under penalty of perjury?
However, he LIED about the terms he used to the committee. And after researching what they actually mean this is inexcusable. He did laugh them off during his testimony and made light of them as Gold Triangle being a drinking game and Rente Alumnus being a friend and boofing being farting. That showed embarrassment on his part as he minimized these teenage entries into his yearbook, which didn’t raise any red flags at the time. But now there is great cause for concern.
But no matter what they find in terms of whether he did or didn’t molest or rape any women, one thing that if he lied to the committee about the definition of the terms and that is cause for concern."
Spot on analysis
A few seconds to fact check yourself might have helped you. Urban dictionary as a source? Lmao.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devils-triangle-drinking-game-explained-by-ex-classmates-of-brett-kavanaugh
-
A few seconds to fact check yourself might have helped you. Urban dictionary as a source? Lmao.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devils-triangle-drinking-game-explained-by-ex-classmates-of-brett-kavanaugh
Actually those quotes are from the esteemed Doctor of Body Language
And from the article YOU posted, maybe you should have taken the same amount of time to read it...
"Not all the people in Kavanaugh's past agree that "Devil's Triangle" was just a drinking game. James Roche, who shared a two-bedroom unit with Kavanaugh at Yale, claimed it was common knowledge that the phrase was sexual in nature.
"Those words were commonly used, and they were references to sexual activities," Roche said on CNN recently. "If you think about the context in which you might hear those words, the way that he described [how] they are defined and the way they are defined, they’re not interchangeable."
He further added that he heard Kavanaugh and his buddies talking about "Devil's Triangle" and "boofing" "regularly."
"I think that contributed to some of my feelings about the fact that these guys treated women in a way I didn’t like," he added.
-
And still there are those Believing & Defending her on here.
And you can bet most of those not believing and defending her have never been sexually assaulted or are close to someone who has been.
-
Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath about a few things.
"But what IS cause for concern is his deception as related to the terms he wrote in his yearbook as you will see below. Having never heard any of these terms before, I looked them up after his testimony and found the following:
BOOFING -according to the urban dictionary means putting alcohol or drugs in your anus ( rectum) for a bigger high. He said it meant farting.
FFFFF- According to the Urban Dictionary means a way to avoid saying the 4 letter F-word by simply drawing out the F word. he said it related to a person he knew who stuttered, If that is true, that alone shows bad character to make fun of someone who stuttered. It shows someone who bullied and made fun of a speech impaired individual.
But the fact that he put FFFF in front of Renate Alumnus shows that he may be referring to having sex with Renate and letting everyone know about it in his yearbook in a public manner. That is called Slut Shaming . Below is Renate’s the girl he slut shamed’s comment.
RENATE ALUMNUS is an actual person named Renate Dolphin who issued the following quote
“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”
So here, Kavanaugh slut-shamed this young girl at the time in high school. In his testimony, he said it was a friend. She thought nothing of it until she learned the true meaning of the term as you just read. With a friend like that you don’t need enemies.
DEVILS TRIANGLE– according to the urban dictionary this term means “a threesome with 1 woman and 2 men. It is important to remember that straight men do not make eye contact while in the act. Doing so will question their sexuality. “
Kavanaugh said it was a drinking game. Was Mark Judge part of that threesome and is that why he does not want to testify under penalty of perjury?
However, he LIED about the terms he used to the committee. And after researching what they actually mean this is inexcusable. He did laugh them off during his testimony and made light of them as Gold Triangle being a drinking game and Rente Alumnus being a friend and boofing being farting. That showed embarrassment on his part as he minimized these teenage entries into his yearbook, which didn’t raise any red flags at the time. But now there is great cause for concern.
But no matter what they find in terms of whether he did or didn’t molest or rape any women, one thing that if he lied to the committee about the definition of the terms and that is cause for concern."
Spot on analysis
Only it Was Her Who Created The Whole Issue.
How about you do an amazing critical analysis of her Shambolic testimony
Let’s see if you can apply the same unbiased attitude to that & let’s see what
You come up with.
Please note when it comes to non verbal communication skill
I’ve long worked in that field & have more than a little experience,
Then again I’d expect You too have a good level of competency also.
I’ll look forward to you breakdown analysis of Her testimony.
See how Spot on that is............
-
And you can bet most of those not believing and defending her have never been sexually assaulted or are close to someone who has been.
As in any situation some won’t have & some will have,
Be they against her or for her
Your point being ?
-
Actually those quotes are from the esteemed Doctor of Body Language
And from the article YOU posted, maybe you should have taken the same amount of time to read it...
"Not all the people in Kavanaugh's past agree that "Devil's Triangle" was just a drinking game. James Roche, who shared a two-bedroom unit with Kavanaugh at Yale, claimed it was common knowledge that the phrase was sexual in nature.
"Those words were commonly used, and they were references to sexual activities," Roche said on CNN recently. "If you think about the context in which you might hear those words, the way that he described [how] they are defined and the way they are defined, they’re not interchangeable."
He further added that he heard Kavanaugh and his buddies talking about "Devil's Triangle" and "boofing" "regularly."
"I think that contributed to some of my feelings about the fact that these guys treated women in a way I didn’t like," he added.
LOL yeah, James Roach on cnn, the guy with an obvious axe to grind, the one guy you libs keep trying to push as the holy grail, meanwhile blatantly ignoring the hundreds that have denied everything he and Ford have said.
Why do you put more stock into what a couple of people have said vs what dozens and dozens have said? Is it because Kavanaugh is republican?
And maybe the "esteemed" doctor should fact check himself before quoting urban dictionary, a site that can be edited by anyone with an account, as you can clearly see if you bothered to look at it.
-
As in any situation some won’t have & some will have,
Be they against her or for her
Your point being ?
Given your experience, you likely already know my point.
My point is that folks who have or know someone who has suffered sexual assault are more likely to believe Ford's testimony, particularly her incomplete or lack of memory regarding the circumstances associated with the trauma.
Please note when it comes to non verbal communication skill
I’ve long worked in that field & have more than a little experience....
-
Given your experience, you likely already know my point.
My point is that folks who have or know someone who has suffered sexual assault are more likely to believe Ford's testimony, particularly her incomplete or lack of memory regarding the circumstances associated with the trauma.
That's just not true. Absolutely 100% not true.
-
Given your experience, you likely already know my point.
My point is that folks who have or know someone who has suffered sexual assault are more likely to believe Ford's testimony, particularly her incomplete or lack of memory regarding the circumstances associated with the trauma.
Nope, no evidence, no memory, lies throughout testimony, denied by everyone else = false no matter who/what you have dealt with.
-
Given your experience, you likely already know my point.
My point is that folks who have or know someone who has suffered sexual assault are more likely to believe Ford's testimony, particularly her incomplete or lack of memory regarding the circumstances associated with the trauma.
Then I’d have to say your point is incorrect.
More so for her given the amount of time she had before giving testimony
As a grown & supposedly intelligent woman she & her team had more than
Enough time to prepare a coherent & Believable statement - And she clearly
Had one / or bullet points as she kept looking down at them.
Fact is likely once she was stood up before the senate she was exposed & couldnt
Keep the fabricated story together hence her awful body language.
That’s why she couldn’t & wouldn’t go to a criminal trial - she wouldn’t of been believed,
And as you are well aware many women do go to trial & are believed.
You’re just putting politics before reasoned rational thinking.
You carry on believing her all you want - Thankfully the majority who mattered & voted Didn’t.
Very similar to the 2016 Election & The lies of Killary
She didn’t win either. ;D
-
LOL yeah, James Roach on cnn, the guy with an obvious axe to grind, the one guy you libs keep trying to push as the holy grail, meanwhile blatantly ignoring the hundreds that have denied everything he and Ford have said.
Why do you put more stock into what a couple of people have said vs what dozens and dozens have said? Is it because Kavanaugh is republican?
And maybe the "esteemed" doctor should fact check himself before quoting urban dictionary, a site that can be edited by anyone with an account, as you can clearly see if you bothered to look at it.
Its actually a her...
-
Nope, no evidence, no memory, lies throughout testimony, denied by everyone else = false no matter who/what you have dealt with.
How's it feel to be one of those guys that no one responds to? I am responding out of sympathy, but I wondered how you felt.
-
Its actually a her...
Oh well....nevermind then, chicks don't need facts according to liberals, everything they say is true!
-
Oh well....nevermind then, chicks don't need facts according to liberals, everything they say is true!
Nice deflect!
-
Nice deflect!
From your deflection?
Regardless male or female, facts should have been checked and she didn't, rather than refute that, you opted to address the error of my post.
-
From your deflection?
Regardless male or female, facts should have been checked and she didn't, rather than refute that, you opted to address the error of my post.
Its not about you. My post, since I apparently have to spell it out for "some" is that if you are gonna display her "opinion" about Ford as an argument from authority, then you have to accept that Kavenaugh lied as well and was under oath while seeking a post on the Supreme court. Not saying YOU are touting her as the end all be all of what is the truth, but the OP wanted us to think it was one sided and some "expert" declared Ford lying.. which fit the narrative of many here. Because I do dig a little deeper than most because truth matters over party , I found that Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath.. which Fox news apparently didn't feel was as important (actually it was Kwon3)
-
Its not about you. My post, since I apparently have to spell it out for "some" is that if you are gonna display her "opinion" about Ford as an argument from authority, then you have to accept that Kavenaugh lied as well and was under oath while seeking a post on the Supreme court. Not saying YOU are touting her as the end all be all of what is the truth, but the OP wanted us to think it was one sided and some "expert" declared Ford lying.. which fit the narrative of many here. Because I do dig a little deeper than most because truth matters over party , I found that Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath.. which Fox news apparently didn't feel was as important (actually it was Kwon3)
what a pile of shite - you watch CNN fake News and take it as gospel ::)
-
How's it feel to be one of those guys that no one responds to? I am responding out of sympathy, but I wondered how you felt.
Not remotely sorry I have upset you.
-
Not remotely sorry I have upset you.
:)
-
what a pile of shite - you watch CNN fake News and take it as gospel ::)
non sequitur.
-
Its not about you. My post, since I apparently have to spell it out for "some" is that if you are gonna display her "opinion" about Ford as an argument from authority, then you have to accept that Kavenaugh lied as well and was under oath while seeking a post on the Supreme court. Not saying YOU are touting her as the end all be all of what is the truth, but the OP wanted us to think it was one sided and some "expert" declared Ford lying.. which fit the narrative of many here. Because I do dig a little deeper than most because truth matters over party , I found that Dr. Glass also said Kavenaugh lied under oath.. which Fox news apparently didn't feel was as important (actually it was Kwon3)
What did Kavanaugh lie about? Can we get a list?
-
What did Kavanaugh lie about? Can we get a list?
Wouldn't matter
-
Wouldn't matter
You're right, this whole thing was about whether or not Ford was a liar, turns out, she is.
-
That's just not true. Absolutely 100% not true.
According to who?
-
Nope, no evidence, no memory, lies throughout testimony, denied by everyone else = false no matter who/what you have dealt with.
Don't tell me, tell this to sexual assault victims.
-
Then I’d have to say your point is incorrect.
More so for her given the amount of time she had before giving testimony
As a grown & supposedly intelligent woman she & her team had more than
Enough time to prepare a coherent & Believable statement - And she clearly
Had one / or bullet points as she kept looking down at them.
Fact is likely once she was stood up before the senate she was exposed & couldnt
Keep the fabricated story together hence her awful body language.
That’s why she couldn’t & wouldn’t go to a criminal trial - she wouldn’t of been believed,
And as you are well aware many women do go to trial & are believed.
You’re just putting politics before reasoned rational thinking.
You carry on believing her all you want - Thankfully the majority who mattered & voted Didn’t.
Very similar to the 2016 Election & The lies of Killary
She didn’t win either. ;D
Ford couldn't file in civil court in Maryland because, a civil sexual abuse case must be filed within: seven years from the victim’s 18th birthday, and three years from the event for adult cases.
She couldn't file in criminal court unless a felony was involved. Felony sexual offenses: no statute of limitations.
Misdemeanor offenses: one year from the event. In Maryland, all sexual assaults are felonies except sexual assault in the fourth degree, which this case appears to be the case as described by Maryland law. https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html (https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html)
Fortunately for Kavanaugh, senate confirmations are not the same as a court of law, but even if it were, he couldn't be charged.
Keep in mind save for one house democrat, Joe Manchin III , all the rest of deciding yea votes were cast republicans and republicans currently have the majority. It's a stretch to compare this to the 2016 presidential election in any way.
-
And you can bet most of those not believing and defending her have never been sexually assaulted or are close to someone who has been.
Given your experience, you likely already know my point.
My point is that folks who have or know someone who has suffered sexual assault are more likely to believe Ford's testimony, particularly her incomplete or lack of memory regarding the circumstances associated with the trauma.
What are you basing that assertion on?
-
Don't tell me, tell this to sexual assault victims.
Your post said "or know someone"....
But it stands for those who have as well. There are plenty who would disagree with what you posted.
-
What are you basing that assertion on?
What cnn told him.
-
Ford couldn't file in civil court in Maryland because, a civil sexual abuse case must be filed within: seven years from the victim’s 18th birthday, and three years from the event for adult cases.
She couldn't file in criminal court unless a felony was involved. Felony sexual offenses: no statute of limitations.
Misdemeanor offenses: one year from the event. In Maryland, all sexual assaults are felonies except sexual assault in the fourth degree, which this case appears to be the case as described by Maryland law. https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html (https://statelaws.findlaw.com/maryland-law/maryland-rape-and-sexual-assault-laws.html)
Fortunately for Kavanaugh, senate confirmations are not the same as a court of law, but even if it were, he couldn't be charged.
Keep in mind save for one house democrat, Joe Manchin III , all the rest of deciding yea votes were cast republicans and republicans currently have the majority. It's a stretch to compare this to the 2016 presidential election in any way.
Yet again you do your usual trick of Totally avoiding answering the majority of points
Raised & answer just 1 part ::)
The comparison to Trumps election win is valid
Her & The Democraps did everything including dirty campaign to discredit & stop people
Voting for him - The same tactics You lot & MSM did against Donald.
Same result though - They both got elected.... ;D
-
Yet again you do your usual trick of Totally avoiding answering the majority of points
Raised & answer just 1 part ::)
The comparison to Trumps election win is valid
Her She & The Democraps did everything including dirty campaign to discredit & stop people
Voting for him - The same tactics You lot & MSM did against Donald.
Same result though - They both got elected.... ;D
You get the top nitpicker award. ;D
Yes, I answer what I choose to because this is my prerogative. If that's avoidance, so be it. I agree with some of what you've posted and disagree with other parts.
Excuse my grammatical correction. It's difficult to be meticulous and not niggle.
Then I’d have to say your point is incorrect.
More so for her given the amount of time she had before giving testimony
As a grown & supposedly intelligent woman she & her team had more than
Enough time to prepare a coherent & Believable statement - And she clearly
Had one / or bullet points as she kept looking down at them.
Fact is likely once she was stood up before the senate she was exposed & couldnt
Keep the fabricated story together hence her awful body language.
That’s why she couldn’t & wouldn’t go to a criminal trial - she wouldn’t of been believed,
And as you are well aware many women do go to trial & are believed.
You’re just putting politics before reasoned rational thinking.
You carry on believing her all you want - Thankfully the majority who mattered & voted Didn’t.
Very similar to the 2016 Election & The lies of Killary
She didn’t win either. ;D
-
What are you basing that assertion on?
The ultimate in victimization. Might as well just say that assault victims are somehow less socially intelligent or somehow incapable of being able to see a blatant fabrication.
-
What cnn told him.
I bet you prefer I believe what you say. After all, you pose as an expert on these matters.
-
I bet you prefer I believe what you say. After all, you pose as an expert on these matters.
Having common sense doesn't make me an expert, just more open minded than you.
-
Having common sense doesn't make me an expert, just more open minded than you.
Not what you meant, but interesting; Open Mind Common Sense https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/open-mind-common-sense/overview/ (https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/open-mind-common-sense/overview/)
More to the point, IYO