Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Kwon3 on October 19, 2018, 05:38:26 PM
-
His pull with Ron is truly amazing at getting people unbanned because he misses their posts.
-
8)
-
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLGUY!
-
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLGUY!
A23 running a Night Train on GB, GS!
-
The Fall Guy...
(http://www.gadgetshowprizes.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/the-fall-guy-4.jpg)
-
Goodmorrow, I Am FALLSVIEW
Kwon you are always a vision of sartorial splendor.
Ron and I have took an oath to bring GetBig back to it original glory. How are we going to do this you may ask?
1. Extra Positivity.
2. More Bodybuilding
3. Less Negativity
4. More Superstars
5. GetBig Members Club.
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLSVIEW?
-
Welcome back K13
-
Goodmorrow, I Am FALLSVIEW
Kwon you are always a vision of sartorial splendor.
Ron and I have took an oath to bring GetBig back to it original glory. How are we going to do this you may ask?
1. Extra Positivity.
2. More Bodybuilding
3. Less Negativity
4. More Superstars
5. GetBig Members Club.
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLSVIEW?
Then you can start by getting rid of Wes, Primemuscle, Vince, Straw Man, Howard, and Agnostic 007. All they do is bring negativity, defeatism, and anti-society values to the boards.
-
His pull with Ron is truly amazing at getting people unbanned because he misses their posts.
Seven day ban and you're back almost to the minute. Wow! Were you sitting at your computer watching the clock count down the seconds?
-
Seven day ban and you're back almost to the minute. Wow! Were you sitting at your computer watching the clock count down the seconds?
Who said it was seven days? It was perpetual until he intervened. I had a few e-mails awaiting answering and figured I'd go and try to answer them.
How's the download progress of the various glory hole videos you're downloading off Xtube user Hoovermouth's channel?
-
idk what you're talking about or if it you meant to quote someone else
i don't report people and i didn't see any threads about me, but thanks if you did
its josh you fucktard
and the only way i got the last acct banned was if you reported that i sent you a pm
not like the mods are hawkeying the pms for me
but whatever, live your lie
-
its josh you fucktard
and the only way i got the last acct banned was if you reported that i sent you a pm
not like the mods are hawkeying the pms for me
but whatever, live your lie
I still see that pm in my inbox, i just replied to it that it was for calling a couple of people out for being pedos that I got banned
didn't see or talk to anyone else
but ok
-
Then you can start by getting rid of Wes, Primemuscle, Vince, Straw Man, Howard, and Agnostic 007. All they do is bring negativity, defeatism, and anti-society values to the boards.
Finally made a list
-
Then you can start by getting rid of Wes, Primemuscle, Vince, Straw Man, Howard, and Agnostic 007. All they do is bring negativity, defeatism, and anti-society values to the boards.
They have all been flagged.
It's in their permanent files.
Bringing nagativity to the super sport of pro bodybuilding WILL NOT...I REPEAT WILL NOT BE TOLLERATED.
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLSVIEW?
-
I still see that pm in my inbox, i just replied to it that it was for calling a couple of people out for being pedos that I got banned
didn't see or talk to anyone else
but ok
Banned for calling out Peadophile’s !!
FFS
Why would that get anyone Banned
-
(https://i19.photozi.com/images/ySDNd.gif)
-
Who said it was seven days? It was perpetual until he intervened. I had a few e-mails awaiting answering and figured I'd go and try to answer them.
How's the download progress of the various glory hole videos you're downloading off Xtube user Hoovermouth's channel?
Good to know.
Everything's going great, thank you.
-
Finally made a list
Me too.
-
Good to know.
Everything's going great, thank you.
Too bad. I like it when bad things happen to bad people, and you're about as bad as it gets.
Banned for calling out Peadophile’s !!
FFS
Why would that get anyone Banned
Don't ask me, ask Ron. The other mods all objected to my banishment.
-
They have all been flagged.
It's in their permanent files.
Bringing nagativity to the super sport of pro bodybuilding WILL NOT...I REPEAT WILL NOT BE TOLLERATED.
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLSVIEW?
Isn't it a lovely day?
(https://www.featurepics.com/StockImage/20130421/rainbow-flag-stock-photo-2678606.jpg)
-
Don't ask me, ask Ron. The other mods all objected to my banishment.
I was being slightly facetious with my question as to Being Banned
You should be Applauded for Calling them out.
Any clues to which 2 - as I didn’t see your posts about them.
-
I was being slightly facetious with my question as to Being Banned
You should be Applauded for Calling them out.
Any clues to which 2 - as I didn’t see your posts about them.
The only people I went after are the ones with a history of inappropriate comments/behavior. Okay, there wasn't proof, but who needs proof when you live in the MeToo/Christine Ford era? If I say it, it's true, and that's all that matters.
-
The only people I went after are the ones with a history of inappropriate comments/behavior. Okay, there wasn't proof, but who needs proof when you live in the MeToo/Christine Ford era? If I say it, it's true, and that's all that matters.
Strangely enough that MeToo/Liar Ford era only applies to women -
mostly of the Liberal Leftist Feminazi type
And their Spine + Balls + Testosterone Lacking male supporters.
-
Strangely enough that MeToo/Liar Ford era only applies to women -
mostly of the Liberal Leftist Feminazi type
And their Spine + Balls + Testosterone Lacking male supporters.
I see a golden opportunity to make their lives miserable with this movement they started and this woman they put up to bringing Kavanaugh down in front of the whole world. After all, they're about fairness, equality, and justice for all victims, right? Good, so next time one of them calls someone out I'll just say they abused me and I don't need to prove it because men were victims of priests and other pedophiles so there's no reason for us to lie about this, either. Let all accusations fly and let all people be believed. We'll see how well that goes over when they suddenly find it's less fun to be accused of something than to do the accusing, as we saw with Asia Argento. "Who, me? Never!" *bedroom picture with kid-lover gets posted* She goes, "It was CONSENSUAL!!!"
::)
-
I see a golden opportunity to make their lives miserable with this movement they started and this woman they put up to bringing Kavanaugh down in front of the whole world. After all, they're about fairness, equality, and justice for all victims, right? Good, so next time one of them calls someone out I'll just say they abused me and I don't need to prove it because men were victims of priests and other pedophiles so there's no reason for us to lie about this, either. Let all accusations fly and let all people be believed. We'll see how well that goes over when they suddenly find it's less fun to be accused of something than to do the accusing, as we saw with Asia Argento. "Who, me? Never!" *bedroom picture with kid-lover gets posted* She goes, "It was CONSENSUAL!!!"
::)
They very likely already have very miserable lives & want to make other innocent people’s lives miserable.
Most of them are so full of self loathing & hating the white Man.
How ironic & Funny that Asia Argento business is.... Strangely Enough she was Supportive of His MeToo
Claim....😂😂😂😂😂
-
Fuck Fallsview and the fucking horse he rode in on.
-
Fuck Fallsview and the fucking horse he rode in on.
I added you to that list more as a joke than anything but now you're proving him right, you sound NEGATIVE!!! ;)
-
Wesly timecocks is constipated from canned tuna
-
Wesly timecocks is constipated from canned tuna
tehehehe this was one of your good posts, Marty. :)
-
Who said it was seven days? It was perpetual until he intervened. I had a few e-mails awaiting answering and figured I'd go and try to answer them.
How's the download progress of the various glory hole videos you're downloading off Xtube user Hoovermouth's channel?
Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board.
-
I added you to that list more as a joke than anything but now you're proving him right, you sound NEGATIVE!!! ;)
I`m only negative when it comes to Ballspew! LOL ;D
-
Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board. Banned from his favorite message board.
All your posts since June 2018 have been replies to my threads or posts. There's something seriously wrong with your brain that you do this in your fifties. Get it looked into before you harm yourself or someone else, and don't come back until you're on something prescription strength for whatever it is they find wrong with you.
I`m only negative when it comes to Ballspew! LOL ;D
That's perfectly fine with me. ;D
-
Too much tuna gives you mercury poisoning which makes you think funny.
-
Goodmorrow I Am FALLSVIEW
Have you ever seen Wes's teeth? They're in competition with Goodrums. You can tell a lot from a persons teeth...
1. Crappy Job. Lacks insurance.
2. Laziness.
3. Drugs
4. Smoker
5. Disease
WHO WANTS TO WALK WITH FALLSVIEW?
-
Seven day ban and you're back almost to the minute. Wow! Were you sitting at your computer watching the clock count down the seconds?
It was NOT a seven-day ban.
-
I was being slightly facetious with my question as to Being Banned
You should be Applauded for Calling them out.
Any clues to which 2 - as I didn’t see your posts about them.
So long as it is justified.
-
It was NOT a seven-day ban.
Okay, but why are you speaking for Kwon3?
-
Okay, but why are you speaking for Kwon3?
Because he’s providing a factually accurate response to your loaded question, which I already answered.
Temporary bans were discontinued after halo and junior abused them. Bans are permanent. They don’t necessarily turn it into an unusable “guest” account but you won’t log it in ever again unless it’s reversed. Remember Top Poodle? Same thing happened to him a year ago.
As mentioned in the first post, I called on a favor from Fallsview and he delivered. His relationship with Ron dates further back than and supersedes all of the friendships the current active mods have with him. He just doesn’t use his clout often because there’s no reason to lower the prestige of said favors by doling them out to everyone.
-
Okay, but why are you speaking for Kwon3?
I'm not speaking for Kwon's 1, 2, or 3.
Just as I never claimed that Peter Fonda speaks for lieberals as a whole the way you recently insinuated I did in another thread on the poli-board.
At your demented age, it seems the only exercise you get is "stretching the truth," and "jumping to conclusions."
I also recall you having a slow & seemingly difficult time publicly denouncing pedophilia on this forum not that long ago.
Nothing wrong with that if that's how you truly feel about the matter.
I just hope you don't wear out your mouse hammering that "report to mod" button for me reporting objective facts again.
-
I'm not speaking for Kwon's 1, 2, or 3.
-
So long as it is justified.
Yes - That’s true.
I should’ve added that.
Thanks.
-
I also recall you having a slow & seemingly difficult time publicly denouncing pedophilia on this forum not that long ago.
Nothing wrong with that if that's how you truly feel about the matter.
I remember that vividly. Indeed, it wasn't me referring to him as having pedophilic tendencies that got me banned. That was weeks ago, and I made my point. The ban actually happened when I jokingly implied the number of highly superfluous and unnecessary ellipses SF1900 uses in some of his thread titles was roughly analogous to the number of instances he'd viewed underage material online. That post got deleted and I was kicked off. But they left the material about prime alone, for the same reason they didn't delete illuminati's posts about pellius to the same effect: It's true.
-
Again, I'm NOT "speaking for" anyone.
I'm simply correcting you because you're wrong as usual.
* I also see that when I quote you, the text field of your message is void of any content & substance - just like all of your posts.
-
I remember that vividly. Indeed, it wasn't me referring to him as having pedophilic tendencies that got me banned. That was weeks ago, and I made my point. The ban actually happened when I jokingly implied the number of highly superfluous and unnecessary ellipses SF1900 uses in some of his thread titles was roughly analogous to the number of instances he'd viewed underage material online. That post got deleted and I was kicked off. But they left the material about prime alone, for the same reason they didn't delete illuminati's posts about pellius to the same effect: It's true.
LOL…
I’m certainly no fan of SF1900, but I can’t justifiably comment on his entire post history because I honestly ignore most of the shit he posts because it’s useless, stupid bullshit.
Having said that, I never endorsed - or even agreed with - going after anyone on here unfoundedly. For example: I don’t care for Basile, but I also never liked guys accusing him of pedo shit because I never personally saw incontrovertible evidence of it in the time I’ve been here since 2006.
Furthermore, I can count on one hand and have fingers left over the times I’ve interacted with Pellius. Based on my limited personal experience, he seems like a good cat. Some folks here have pointed out some questionable posts in his history. Again: maybe there’s something there, but I’m not qualified to comment either way.
A short time ago, I gave prime a hard time over some comments I personally saw he made defending pedophiles because, in my book, that doesn’t sit right with me. He tried explaining/dismissing/rationalizing it as some kind of mental disorder, etc., and it took a long time and a great collective effort to get him to finally concede that pedophilia is bad/wrong.
Intentional or not, prime is controversial by many folks’ standards. I enjoy confronting him on issues, but I don’t believe he is a “bad” person by any means. I suspect he enjoys playing devil's advocate, and that’s cool. Or, maybe he’s just got a very different belief set. That’s cool, too. However, I DON’T believe that everyone deserves the benefit of doubt, and I will publicly speak out against such muther-fukkers.
My point is: accusations need to be founded. They need a base. You can’t accuse someone of something simply because they’re odd or different. There was a poster here years ago who went by the handle “garebear.” We ran him off because of DIRECT EVIDENCE he was a sick piece of shit.
The “council elders” here are both subjective and objective, if that make sense. They’ve got opinions, but consider everything before making a decision (more objective than me). They do what they genuinely believe is right. That is why they are appointed to that role - like it or not.
That’s just how it is.
-
LOL…
I’m certainly no fan of SF1900, but I can’t justifiably comment on his entire post history because I honestly ignore most of the shit he posts because it’s useless, stupid bullshit.
Having said that, I never endorsed - or even agreed with - going after anyone on here unfoundedly. For example: I don’t care for Basile, but I also never liked guys accusing him of pedo shit because I never personally saw incontrovertible evidence of it in the time I’ve been here since 2006.
Furthermore, I can count on one hand and have fingers left over the times I’ve interacted with Pellius. Based on my limited personal experience, he seems like a good cat. Some folks here have pointed out some questionable posts in his history. Again: maybe there’s something there, but I’m not qualified to comment either way.
A short time ago, I gave prime a hard time over some comments I personally saw he made defending pedophiles because, in my book, that doesn’t sit right with me. He tried explaining/dismissing/rationalizing it as some kind of mental disorder, etc., and it took a long time and a great collective effort to get him to finally concede that pedophilia is bad/wrong.
Intentional or not, prime is controversial by many folks’ standards. I enjoy confronting him on issues, but I don’t believe he is a “bad” person by any means. I suspect he enjoys playing devil's advocate, and that’s cool. Or, maybe he’s just got a very different belief set. That’s cool, too. However, I DON’T believe that everyone deserves the benefit of doubt, and I will publicly speak out against such muther-fukkers.
My point is: accusations need to be founded. They need a base. You can’t accuse someone of something simply because they’re odd or different. There was a poster here years ago who went by the handle “garebear.” We ran him off because of DIRECT EVIDENCE he was a sick piece of shit.
The “council elders” here are both subjective and objective, if that make sense. They’ve got opinions, but consider everything before making a decision (more objective than me). They do what they genuinely believe is right. That is why they are appointed to that role - like it or not.
That’s just how it is.
Gee, thanks.
Make me feel good for a few hours then come and take my picnic away when I'm chillin under the sun by saying you believe in shit like rights, evidence, fairness on this site.
dickhead
-
Gee, thanks.
Make me feel good for a few hours then come and take my picnic away when I'm chillin under the sun by saying you believe in shit like rights, evidence, fairness on this site.
dickhead
;D
-
Gee, thanks.
Make me feel good for a few hours then come and take my picnic away when I'm chillin under the sun by saying you believe in shit like rights, evidence, fairness on this site.
dickhead
I like your posts.
I don't want to see you banned for some stupid shit.
-
LOL…
I’m certainly no fan of SF1900, but I can’t justifiably comment on his entire post history because I honestly ignore most of the shit he posts because it’s useless, stupid bullshit.
Having said that, I never endorsed - or even agreed with - going after anyone on here unfoundedly. For example: I don’t care for Basile, but I also never liked guys accusing him of pedo shit because I never personally saw incontrovertible evidence of it in the time I’ve been here since 2006.
Furthermore, I can count on one hand and have fingers left over the times I’ve interacted with Pellius. Based on my limited personal experience, he seems like a good cat. Some folks here have pointed out some questionable posts in his history. Again: maybe there’s something there, but I’m not qualified to comment either way.
A short time ago, I gave prime a hard time over some comments I personally saw he made defending pedophiles because, in my book, that doesn’t sit right with me. He tried explaining/dismissing/rationalizing it as some kind of mental disorder, etc., and it took a long time and a great collective effort to get him to finally concede that pedophilia is bad/wrong.
Intentional or not, prime is controversial by many folks’ standards. I enjoy confronting him on issues, but I don’t believe he is a “bad” person by any means. I suspect he enjoys playing devil's advocate, and that’s cool. Or, maybe he’s just got a very different belief set. That’s cool, too. However, I DON’T believe that everyone deserves the benefit of doubt, and I will publicly speak out against such muther-fukkers.
My point is: accusations need to be founded. They need a base. You can’t accuse someone of something simply because they’re odd or different. There was a poster here years ago who went by the handle “garebear.” We ran him off because of DIRECT EVIDENCE he was a sick piece of shit.
The “council elders” here are both subjective and objective, if that make sense. They’ve got opinions, but consider everything before making a decision (more objective than me). They do what they genuinely believe is right. That is why they are appointed to that role - like it or not.
That’s just how it is.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/YitBbyU7DNjUs/giphy.gif)
-
I remember that vividly. Indeed, it wasn't me referring to him as having pedophilic tendencies that got me banned. That was weeks ago, and I made my point. The ban actually happened when I jokingly implied the number of highly superfluous and unnecessary ellipses SF1900 uses in some of his thread titles was roughly analogous to the number of instances he'd viewed underage material online. That post got deleted and I was kicked off. But they left the material about prime alone, for the same reason they didn't delete illuminati's posts about pellius to the same effect: It's true.
My "fuck you" finger is hovering over the "report to moderator" button. Hmm, should I or shouldn't I? Eeny, meeny, miny, moe. -let you stay or let you go. :-*
-
My "fuck you" finger is hovering over the "report to moderator" button. Hmm, should I or shouldn't I? Eeny, meeny, miny, moe. -let you stay or let you go. :-*
buddy, let's be honest with each other. It doesn't get any more "fuck you" than this:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392895.0;attach=425783;image)
-
My "fuck you" finger is hovering over the "report to moderator" button. Hmm, should I or shouldn't I? Eeny, meeny, miny, moe. -let you stay or let you go. :-*
That "finger" doesn't carry as much weight as you seemingly think.
-
That "finger" doesn't carry as much weight as you seemingly think.
no, but it does give a young lad who claims 18 the chance to give daddy a chance to find his boy's g-spot with it, allegedly on account of its arthritic crookedness landling his mid-finger joint directly over the subject's allegedly swollen prostate, getting him off almost instantly (with prime positioned towards his groin, the better to chance his scum in his face).
-
no, but it does give a young lad who claims 18 the chance to give daddy a chance to find his boy's g-spot with it, allegedly on account of its arthritic crookedness landling his mid-finger joint directly over the subject's allegedly swollen prostate, getting him off almost instantly (with prime positioned towards his groin, the better to chance his scum in his face).
LOL
Geezus Krist, man...
I'm trying to help keep you out of "Time Out," or whatever the fuck they call it now.
I hope you keep writing material while you're in the joint.
See you on the other side soon, brother!!
:'( :)
-
LOL
Geezus Krist, man...
I'm trying to help keep you out of "Time Out," or whatever the fuck they call it now.
I hope you keep writing material while you're in the joint.
See you on the other side soon, brother!!
:'( :)
no, they fucking got rid of it (time out)
too bad, they should reinstate it
having 1 star and a "Time Out" forum signature was serious street cred on here back in the days
meant you were a forum bad boy and at the time women still posted here and came to you
since you could log in as a Time Out and reply or write anything, just couldn't post, otherwise functional
bans are gay now, they don't even give you that "guest" status that shows you're smoked. It shows your profile and posts like normal and just doesnt let you log in along with a really mean-spirited reason written by Ron underneath the Sorry! message. Pretty weak.
-
no, they fucking got rid of it (time out)
too bad, they should reinstate it
having 1 star and a "Time Out" forum signature was serious street cred on here back in the days
meant you were a forum bad boy and at the time women still posted here and came to you
since you could log in as a Time Out and reply or write anything, just couldn't post, otherwise functional
bans are gay now, they don't even give you that "guest" status that shows you're smoked. It shows your profile and posts like normal and just doesnt let you log in along with a really mean-spirited reason written by Ron underneath the Sorry! message. Pretty weak.
Sounds like you've "been here" longer than the date of your account registry.
Respect.
-
Sounds like you've "been here" longer than the date of your account registry.
Respect.
i've clocked a few million hours on here
-
i've clocked a few million hours on here
8)
-
Time Out was awesome.
Was a good read.
-
buddy, let's be honest with each other. It doesn't get any more "fuck you" than this:
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=392895.0;attach=425783;image)
Damn the kitchen was so stuck in the 70's. Looks much more up to date now. Makes me glad that I spent $100,000 remodeling it.
Thanks. How about you showing us your "fuck you" face. Bet it's not as good as mine. ;)
-
Damn the kitchen was so stuck in the 70's. Looks much more up to date now. Makes me glad that I spent $100,000 remodeling it.
Thanks. How about you showing us your "fuck you" face. Bet it's not as good as mine. ;)
I'm good. Another guy with a habit of demanding photos from the people who upset him got his ass handed to him in perfectly sliced cutting patterns as if with a Japanese knife in Narcissistic Deity's thread not along ago. I wouldn't do that to you.
I would hopefully love to just always reply to you with this quote, because it's so epic:
As he explains himself to complete strangers on the internet LMFAO ;D
All I did was quote YOUR words in all their reprehensible glory. YOUR words were quoted with the original tread title attached so anyone can go search for themselves and read about your " context " ::)
You're a sketchy creepy individual with a very warped sense of " morality " YOU have said , YOURSELF a 13 year old girl can consent to having sex with grown men. I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK about history. This statement alone solidifies your reputation as a disgusting amoral asshole. Go to hell and fuck off of my tread you creepy loser.
-
I'm good. Another guy with a habit of demanding photos from the people who upset him got his ass handed to him in perfectly sliced cutting patterns as if with a Japanese knife in Narcissistic Deity's thread not along ago. I wouldn't do that to you.
I would hopefully love to just always reply to you with this quote, because it's so epic:
As if NarcissisticDeity's response to a Pellius post has anything what-so-ever to do with me. Nice try....camera shy guy.
What makes you think you upset me? All I asked for was for you to post a photo of yourself. What's the big deal? Nobody will care that you're just another ugly troll.
(http://www.crywalt.com/blog/images/20100220/troll.jpg)
-
As if NarcissisticDeity's response to a Pellius post has anything what-so-ever to do with me. Nice try....camera shy guy.
What makes you think you upset me? All I asked for was for you to post a photo of yourself. What's the big deal? Nobody will care that you're just another ugly troll.
(http://www.crywalt.com/blog/images/20100220/troll.jpg)
want me to go back to that thread and pull up an example of pellius saying virtually the same thing to illuminati as you just did in this post? The other guy already pointed out you were slow to condemn pedophilia recently enough, I've caught you in multiple perverted utterances that you played off by accusing me of being into the same things just because I've heard of them being popular with old gay weirdos, and now you're copying the posting style (almost to the point of verbatim) of a guy accused of the things you're accused of. See the problem with your strategy? I see several.
Also, these boards are anonymous for a reason. Only people who've been exposed try to get you to post a photo when you ridicule the ones of them floating around. Normal people like Go 4 It posts photos regularly because it's part of his job and he doesn't ask anyone to post one of them just because he did.
-
want me to go back to that thread and pull up an example of pellius saying virtually the same thing to illuminati as you just did in this post? The other guy already pointed out you were slow to condemn pedophilia recently enough, I've caught you in multiple perverted utterances that you played off by accusing me of being into the same things just because I've heard of them being popular with old gay weirdos, and now you're copying the posting style (almost to the point of verbatim) of a guy accused of the things you're accused of. See the problem with your strategy? I see several.
Also, these boards are anonymous for a reason. Only people who've been exposed try to get you to post a photo when you ridicule the ones of them floating around. Normal people like Go 4 It posts photos regularly because it's part of his job and he doesn't ask anyone to post one of them just because he did.
Yadda, yadda, yadda.
BTW, your reply reads like a meltdown.... just threats, innuendos and diversions with no substance or selfies. ::)
-
Yadda, yadda, yadda.
BTW, your reply reads like a meltdown.... just threats, innuendos and diversions with no substance or selfies. ::)
I'm simply standing in front of a pothole - a very deep and dark pothole from which your reputation can never recover - to prevent you from falling in by lending you a pointer on forum etiquette and how demanding photos is classic 2003 steroid meltdown material from bodybuilding.com (or Narcissistic's thread about 30 pages earlier). Also, coming after me in every thread or post I make will likely earn you the ire not only of myself but people who find people like you quite easily with everything you've put out there.
-
I'm simply standing in front of a pothole - a very deep and dark pothole from which your reputation can never recover - to prevent you from falling in by lending you a pointer on forum etiquette and how demanding photos is classic 2003 steroid meltdown material from bodybuilding.com (or Narcissistic's thread about 30 pages earlier). Also, coming after me in every thread or post I make will likely earn you the ire not only of myself but people who find people like you quite easily with everything you've put out there.
You're too kind, lending me a pointer and all. Clearly, you are an expert on forum etiquette. :-*
And yet another veiled threat. I've said this before, if you or anyone else wants to find me, go for it.
Just so you know, I couldn't care less whether you post a photo of yourself or not. But, seeing you getting all upset about it has been fun.
-
You're too kind, lending me a pointer and all. Clearly, you are an expert on forum etiquette. :-*
And yet another veiled threat. I've said this before, if you or anyone else wants to find me, go for it.
Just so you know, I couldn't care less whether you post a photo of yourself or not. But, seeing you getting all upset about it has been fun.
You pretended to be straight to your wife for over 30 years. You've proven that you're capable of reshaping your reality to suit your personal needs and phobias. Remember, delusion is seeing what you want to see. There's no meltdowns or upset people, just a friendly but final warning to cool it with the report button, because you're quickly replacing 240 is Back as the biggest crybaby here.
-
You pretended to be straight to your wife for over 30 years. You've proven that you're capable of reshaping your reality to suit your personal needs and phobias. Remember, delusion is seeing what you want to see. There's no meltdowns or upset people, just a friendly but final warning to cool it with the report button, because you're quickly replacing 240 is Back as the biggest crybaby here.
Thanks for the warning about the report to moderator button. Just curious, what are you going to do if and when I report someone? Final warning....really? ::)
Oh and just so you know, I don't now, nor have I ever pretended to be straight to anyone. Not that my relationship with my late wife is any of your business.
“What we see depends mainly on what we look for.”
― John Lubbock